A Phytochemical, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Study of Extracts of the Apiaceae Family and Their Fractions: “Study of the Effect of Synergy and/or Antagonism” †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and Extraction
2.2. Fractionation
2.3. Phytochemical Tests
- Alkaloids: Tests were conducted using precipitation reactions with Mayer’s and Wagner’s reagents. A total of 1 mL of the extract (or fraction) was divided into two equal parts: one was treated with 0.5 mL of Mayer’s reagent and the other with 0.5 mL of Wagner’s reagent. The presence of alkaloids was confirmed by the formation of a white precipitate with Mayer’s reagent or a brown precipitate with Wagner’s reagent.
- Tannins: Tannins were detected by adding 1 mL of water and 1 to 2 drops of a 1% FeCl₃ solution to 1 mL of the extract (or fraction). The appearance of a dark green or blue-green color indicated the presence of tannins. Dark green suggested catechin tannins, while blue-green indicated the presence of gallic tannins.
- Flavonoids: A total of 1 mL of the extract (or fraction) was placed in a test tube. To this, 1 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and three magnesium chips were added. A red or yellow coloration revealed the presence of flavonoids.
- Saponins: A total of 10 mL of the hexanoic extract was placed in a test tube, shaken for a few seconds, and left to stand for 15 min. The formation of a persistent foam indicated the presence of saponins.
- Terpenoids: A total of 5 mL of the extract was added to 2 mL of chloroform and 3 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4). The formation of two phases and a brown color at the interface indicated the presence of terpenoids.
2.4. Bioactivity Assays
- DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay
- Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity by β-Carotene Assay
- Anti-inflammatory activity
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Vijayan, P.; Raghu, C. Plants of the Apiaceae family: Their chemical composition, pharmacological properties, and therapeutic potential. Med. Chem. Res. 2016, 25, 2479–2506. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sayed, E.M. Phytochemical investigation of some apiaceae plants in Egypt with special reference to their potential as anticancer agents. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000522. [Google Scholar]
- Alipour, G.; Dashti, S.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Iraji, A. Phytochemical and pharmacological properties of the genus Ferula: A review. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2017, 7, 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Benarba, B.; Belabbes, R.; Medjdoub, H. A review on the phytochemistry and pharmacology of Ruta chalepensis. Pharm. Anal. Acta 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Mancini, E.; Arnold, N.A.; De Martino, L. Chemical composition and phytotoxic effects of essential oils from four Thymus taxa: Evidence for a rich-chemotype in Thymus algeriensis Boiss. & Reut. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 127, 208–215. [Google Scholar]
- Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, S.; Chatterjee, P.; Dey, P.; Bhattacharya, S. Evaluation of in vitro anti-inflammatory activity of coffee against the denaturation of protein. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, S178–S180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, L.; Vasquez, E.; Milan, P.; Zebitz, C.; Kraus, W. In vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial activities of phenylpropanoids from Piper betle L. (Piperaceae). In Natural Products in the New Millennium: Prospects and Industrial Application, Proceeding of the Phytochemical Society of Europe; Rauter, A.P., Palma, P.B., Justino, J., Araujo, M.E., dos Santos, S.P., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; Volume 47, pp. 221–227. [Google Scholar]
IC50 (mg/mL) DPPH• Scavenging | IC50 (mg/mL) β-Carotene | |
---|---|---|
Methanolic extract | 0.2 ± 0.8 | 0.28 ± 0.5 |
Et2O extract | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.15 |
Polar fractions of methanolic extract | 0.084 ± 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.46 |
Apolar fractions of methanolic extract | 0.73 ± 0.75 | 0.97 ± 0.02 |
Polar fractions of Et2O extract | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 1.14 ± 0.06 |
Apolar fractions of Et2O extract | 1.084 ± 0.08 | 1.21 ± 0.21 |
BHT | 0.69 ± 0.21 | 0.72 ± 0.15 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Belbachir, F.Z.; Hamdan, L.; Yahia, K.M.D. A Phytochemical, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Study of Extracts of the Apiaceae Family and Their Fractions: “Study of the Effect of Synergy and/or Antagonism”. Chem. Proc. 2024, 16, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20163
Belbachir FZ, Hamdan L, Yahia KMD. A Phytochemical, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Study of Extracts of the Apiaceae Family and Their Fractions: “Study of the Effect of Synergy and/or Antagonism”. Chemistry Proceedings. 2024; 16(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20163
Chicago/Turabian StyleBelbachir, Fatima Zohra, Lamia Hamdan, and Kamel Mustapha Dali Yahia. 2024. "A Phytochemical, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Study of Extracts of the Apiaceae Family and Their Fractions: “Study of the Effect of Synergy and/or Antagonism”" Chemistry Proceedings 16, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20163
APA StyleBelbachir, F. Z., Hamdan, L., & Yahia, K. M. D. (2024). A Phytochemical, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Study of Extracts of the Apiaceae Family and Their Fractions: “Study of the Effect of Synergy and/or Antagonism”. Chemistry Proceedings, 16(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20163