Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Novel Benzocaine and Procaine Glycodrugs
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Triazolyl Derivatives Based on Thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidine Propargyl Ethers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Synthesis of Novel Aryl-Substituted Acetylenic Monoterpene Analogues by Sonogashira Coupling †

by
Rinat Gubaidullin
* and
Lyudmila Parfenova
Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis, Ufa Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences 141 Prospekt Oktyabrya, Ufa 450075, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 28th International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry (ECSOC-28), 15–30 November 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/ecsoc-28.
Chem. Proc. 2024, 16(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20124
Published: 14 November 2024

Abstract

:
The synthesis of new aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpene derivatives was carried out by the Sonogashira reaction. The reactions proceed in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI and Et3N and provide aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpenes with an isolated yield of 70–82%.

1. Introduction

Terpenes and terpenoids are naturally occurring secondary metabolites isolated from plants, which exhibit a broad spectrum of biological activity and provide a large library of basic structures for medicinal chemistry [1,2,3,4]. Within this class of substances, camphor and carvone have long been used as starting compounds for the synthesis of new drug candidates [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Since natural compounds typically have a complex structure, differing in the hydrocarbon framework and/or the number and position of functional groups, the search for chemo-, stereo- and regioselective methods of native molecule transformation to obtain promising pharmacologically significant analogues is of great importance. To date, numerous derivatives of camphor and carvone have been synthesized, which showed various biological effects [13,14,15]. The present work is aimed at the synthesis of new aryl-substituted propynyl analogues of camphor and carvone as promising building blocks.

2. Results and Discussion

First, the alkylation of camphor and carvone with propargyl bromide in the presence of base KN(SiMe3)2–Et3B in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) at room temperature provides 2-propargyl-substituted camphor and carvone derivatives with a yield of 69% and 47%, respectively [16]. Second, the synthesis of aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpene derivatives with a yield of 70-82% was carried out by the Sonogashira reaction in the presence of PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI and Et3N (Scheme 1).
The structure of the obtained compounds was confirmed by 1D (1H, 13C) NMR experiments. Thus, in the 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3, a shift in the signals of the acetylene bond carbon atoms C-2′ and C-3′ to a downfield (to the region of 88.5 and 81.3 ppm, respectively) compared to the corresponding signals of carbon atoms of the terminal acetylene bond was observed. In addition to the characteristic signals of camphor, four new signals of carbon atoms appeared in the spectrum at 123.7, 127.8, 128.2 and 131.6 ppm, which were assigned to the atoms of the phenyl ring. In the 1H NMR spectrum, the signal of the H-3′ proton at 2.00 ppm was absent and new signals of the aromatic ring were observed in the region of 7.42-7.41 and 7.30-7.29, which were assigned to H-6′-8′, H-5′ and 9′, respectively.

3. Conclusions

Thus, we have obtained new camphor and carvone analogues containing a phenyl-substituted acetylene bond via Sonogashira coupling, catalyzed with PdCl2(PPh3)2 and copper (I) iodide. At present, a systematic study of this reaction is being carried out with the aim of involving a wide range of aryl iodides to obtain a set of promising structural blocks for the synthesis of new biologically active compounds.

4. Experimental Part

Camphor, carvone, BEt3, KN(SiMe3)2 (1 M solution in THF), propargyl bromide, PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, Et3N, DMF and DME (dimethoxyethane) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Acros) and used without any further purification. The alkylation reactions of the compounds were carried out under dried argon atmosphere. Compounds 2 and 5 were prepared according to the known procedure [16]. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance–500 instrument (500.13 (1H) and 125.78 MHz (13C)) in CDCl3 with Me4Si as the internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) of compounds were obtained on a spectrometer MaXis impact (Bruker) using a mass analyzer (TOF) with electrospray ionization (ESI). TLC was carried out on Sorbfil plates (Sorbpolimer, Krasnodar, Russia) in hexane–EtOAc (from 50:1 to 10:1); spots were visualized with anisaldehyde. Silica gel L (KSKG grade, 50–160 μm) was employed for column chromatography.
General procedure for the synthesis of aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpene 3 and 6 via Sonogashira coupling reaction
A mixture of corresponding terpenoid (0.6 mmol), iodobenzene (0.5 mmol) and Et3N (0.75 mL, 5.4 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (4.5 mL). Then, CuI (11 mg, 0.06 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (21 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added to the mixture simultaneously and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1–3 h under an argon atmosphere. The completion of the reaction was monitored by TLC analysis. The reaction was quenched by the addition of water and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried with MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on SiO2 with hexane/EtOAc (from 100:1 to 1:10) as an eluent to afford pure products 3 and 6.
1,7,7-trimethyl-3-(3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-one (3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 0.88 (3H, s, H-8),
  • 0.93 (3H, s, H-10),
  • 0.97 (3H, s, H-9),
  • 1.48-1.43 (1H, m, Hb-5),
  • 1.57-1.51 (1H, m, Hb-6),
  • 1.71-1.67 (1H, m, Ha-6),
  • 2.08-2.05 (1H, m, Ha-5),
  • 2.22 (1H, dd, J = 4.5 Hz, J = 11 Hz, H-4),
  • 2.29 (1H, m, H-3),
  • 2.39 (1H, dd, J = 12 Hz, J = 17 Hz, Ha-1′),
  • 2.98 (1H, dd, J = 4 Hz, J = 17 Hz, Hb-1′),
  • 7.30-7.29 (3H, m, H-6′-8’),
7.42-7.41 (2H, m, H-5′ and 9′). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 219.2 (C-2), 131.6 (C-6′, C-8′), 128.2 (C-5′, C-9′), 127.8 (C-7′), 123.7 (C-4′), 88.6 (C-2′), 81.3 (C-3′), 57.9 (C-1), 53.6 (C-3), 46.8 (C-7), 46.6 (C-4), 29.3 (C-5), 29.2 (C-6), 21.6 (C-8), 21.3 (C-1′), 20.5 (C-9), 9.5 (C-10). HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+, calcd for C19H22O: 289.1568 found 289.1583. Found (%): C 85.42; H 8.31. Calcd for C19H22O (%): C 85.67; H 8.32.
2-methyl-6-(3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)-5-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-en-1-one (6). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 1.81 (s, 3H, H-9), 1.83 (s, 3H, H-10), 2.41-2.36 (m, 1H, Ha-4), 2.5-2.47 (m, 1H, Hb-4), 2.59-2.53 (m, 2H, H-5, H-6), 3.07-3.03 (m, 2H, Ha-1′, Hb-1′), 4.95 (s, 1H, Ha-8), 4.99 (s, 1H, Hb-8), 6.75-6.74 (m, 1H, H-3), 7.27-2.76 (m, 3H, H-6′-8′), 7.37-7.36 (m, 2H, H-5′ and 9′). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 198.7 (C-1), 144.8 (C-7), 143.8 (C-3), 135.2 (C-2), 131.6 (C-6′, C-8′), 128.1 (C-5′, C-9′), 127.5 (C-7′), 124.0 (C-4′), 114.1 (C-8), 87.8 (C-2′), 81.5 (C-3′), 48.4 (C-6), 46.8 (C-5), 30.8 (C-4), 18.9 (C-9), 17.6 (C-10), 16.1 (C-1′).
HRMS: m/z [M+Na]+, calcd for C19H20O: 287.1412 found 287.1430. Found (%): C 86.35; H 7.64. Calcd for C19H20O (%): C 86.32; H 7.63.

Author Contributions

Validation and writing—review and editing, L.P.; chemistry experiments, R.G.; The manuscript was prepared through the contributions of L.P. and R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Government theme FMRS-2022-0081).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Acknowledgments

The structural studies of the synthesized compounds were performed with the use of Collective Usage Centre “Agidel” at the Institute of Petrochemistry and Catalysis of RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zielińska-Błajet, M.; Feder-Kubis, J. Monoterpenes and Their Derivatives—Recent Development in Biological and Medical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lei, Y.; Fu, P.; Jun, X.; Cheng, P. Pharmacological Properties of Geraniol—A Review. Planta Med. 2019, 85, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Makhaeva, G.F.; Elkina, N.A.; Shchegolkov, E.V.; Boltneva, N.P.; Lushchekina, S.V.; Serebryakova, O.G.; Rudakova, E.V.; Kovaleva, N.V.; Radchenko, E.V.; Palyulin, V.A.; et al. Synthesis, molecular docking, and biological evaluation of 3-oxo-2-tolylhydrazinylidene-4,4,4-trifluorobutanoates bearing higher and natural alcohol moieties as new selective carboxylesterase inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 91, 103097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chernyshov, V.V.; Yarovaya, O.I.; Fadeev, D.S.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Esaulkova, Y.L.; Muryleva, A.S.; Sinegubova, K.O.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Salakhutdinov, N.F. Single-stage synthesis of heterocyclic alkaloid-like compounds from (+)-camphoric acid and their antiviral activity. Mol. Divers. 2020, 24, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Oreshko, V.V.; Kovaleva, K.S.; Mordvinova, E.D.; Yarovaya, O.I.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Shcherbakov, D.N.; Bormotov, N.I.; Serova, O.A.; Shishkina, L.N.; Salakhutdinov, N.F. Synthesis and Antiviral Properties of Camphor-Derived Iminothiazolidine-4-Ones and 2,3-Dihydrothiazoles. Molecules 2022, 27, 4761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bouyahya, A.; Mechchate, H.; Benali, T.; Ghchime, R.; Charfi, S.; Balahbib, A.; Burkov, P.; Shariati, M.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Omari, N. El Health Benefits and Pharmacological Properties of Carvone. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oubella, A.; Bimoussa, A.; N’ait Oussidi, A.; Fawzi, M.; Auhmani, A.; Morjani, H.; Riahi, A.; Esseffar, M.; Parish, C.; Ait Itto, M.Y. New 1,2,3-Triazoles from (R)-Carvone: Synthesis, DFT Mechanistic Study and In Vitro Cytotoxic Evaluation. Molecules 2022, 27, 769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kovaleva, K.S.; Zubkov, F.I.; Bormotov, N.I.; Novikov, R.A.; Dorovatovskii, P.V.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Gatilov, Y.V.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Yarovaya, O.I.; Shishkina, L.N.; et al. Synthesis of D -(+)-camphor-based N -acylhydrazones and their antiviral activity. Medchemcomm 2018, 9, 2072–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sokolova, A.S.; Baranova, D.V.; Yarovaya, O.I.; Baev, D.S.; Polezhaeva, O.A.; Zybkina, A.V.; Shcherbakov, D.N.; Tolstikova, T.G.; Salakhutdinov, N.F. Synthesis of (1S)-(+)-camphor-10-sulfonic acid derivatives and investigations in vitro and in silico of their antiviral activity as the inhibitors of fi lovirus infections. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2019, 68, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pina, L.T.S.; Serafini, M.R.; Oliveira, M.A.; Sampaio, L.A.; Guimarães, J.O.; Guimarães, A.G. Carvone and its pharmacological activities: A systematic review. Phytochemistry 2022, 196, 113080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dai, M.; Wu, L.; Yu, K.; Xu, R.; Wei, Y.; Chinnathambi, A.; Alahmadi, T.A.; Zhou, M. D-Carvone inhibit cerebral ischemia/reperfusion induced inflammatory response TLR4/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 132, 110870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gopalakrishnan, T.; Ganapathy, S.; Veeran, V.; Namasivayam, N. Preventive effect of D-carvone during DMBA induced mouse skin tumorigenesis by modulating xenobiotic metabolism and induction of apoptotic events. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Oubella, A.; El Mansouri, A.-E.; Fawzi, M.; Bimoussa, A.; Laamari, Y.; Auhmani, A.; Morjani, H.; Robert, A.; Riahi, A.; Youssef Ait Itto, M. Thiazolidinone-linked1,2,3-triazoles with monoterpenic skeleton as new potential anticancer agents: Design, synthesis and molecular docking studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 115, 105184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sokolova, A.S.; Yarovaya, O.I.; Shernyukov, A.V.; Pokrovsky, M.A.; Pokrovsky, A.G.; Lavrinenko, V.A.; Zarubaev, V.V.; Tretiak, T.S.; Anfimov, P.M.; Kiselev, O.I.; et al. New quaternary ammonium camphor derivatives and their antiviral activity, genotoxic effects and cytotoxicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6690–6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fernandes, T.A.; Mendes, F.; Roseiro, A.P.S.; Santos, I.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N. Insight into the cytotoxicity of polynuclear Cu(I) camphor complexes. Polyhedron 2015, 87, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gubaidullin, R.R.; Perfilova, Y.A.; Parfenova, L.V. Synthesis of Novel Propynyl Monoterpene Analogues and their Conjugates with β-DGlucopyranosides. Curr. Org. Chem. 2024, 28, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpenes.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aryl-substituted acetylenic monoterpenes.
Chemproc 16 00044 sch001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gubaidullin, R.; Parfenova, L. Synthesis of Novel Aryl-Substituted Acetylenic Monoterpene Analogues by Sonogashira Coupling. Chem. Proc. 2024, 16, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20124

AMA Style

Gubaidullin R, Parfenova L. Synthesis of Novel Aryl-Substituted Acetylenic Monoterpene Analogues by Sonogashira Coupling. Chemistry Proceedings. 2024; 16(1):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gubaidullin, Rinat, and Lyudmila Parfenova. 2024. "Synthesis of Novel Aryl-Substituted Acetylenic Monoterpene Analogues by Sonogashira Coupling" Chemistry Proceedings 16, no. 1: 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20124

APA Style

Gubaidullin, R., & Parfenova, L. (2024). Synthesis of Novel Aryl-Substituted Acetylenic Monoterpene Analogues by Sonogashira Coupling. Chemistry Proceedings, 16(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-28-20124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop