Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Assessment of Selected Conductive Polymers for Probable Mercury Remediation in Wastewater—Experimental and DFT Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Characterization of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon Stump-Derived Biomass: Evaluation of Valorization Potential

by
Jasmina Popović
1,
Gordana Petković
1,
Sanja Petrović
2,
Jelena Zvezdanović
2,
Milica Vranić
1,
Maja Krstić Ristivojević
3,
Đurđa Ivković
4 and
Ivana Lavadinović
1,*
1
Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Technology, University of Niš, Bulevar oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, Serbia
3
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 12-16, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
4
Innovative Centre of the Faculty of Chemistry Ltd., University of Belgrade, Faculty of Chemistry, Studentski Trg 12-16, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Analytica 2026, 7(3), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica7030056
Submission received: 27 June 2026 / Revised: 6 August 2026 / Accepted: 13 August 2026 / Published: 17 August 2026

Abstract

During forest exploitation, large amounts of wood biomass are left as residues after harvesting, even though this material could be valuable in reducing greenhouse gas emissions by replacing fossil fuels and serving as a source of bioactive compounds. Within the context of the European Union’s circular bioeconomy strategy, enhancing the efficacy and rational application of forest logging residues constitutes a critical future objective. To evaluate the possible use of the stumps as forest residue-derived woody biomass for the first time, the chemical composition and presence of bioactive compounds in the xylem and bark of F. angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon stumps were analyzed, including the content of cellulose, acid-insoluble lignin, acid-soluble lignin, ash, and extractives soluble in toluene–ethanol and hot water. In hot water extracts, total phenolic content, the antioxidant activity determined by scavenging capacity toward DPPH and HPTLC, the content of elements by ICP-OES, and the identification of bioactive compounds by UHPLC-DAD-ESI MS/MS were assessed. Considering the chemical composition, the quality of the xylem of the F. angustifolia (cellulose: 42.46 ± 0.45%; lignin: 25.05 ± 0.02%; hemicelluloses: 19.74 ± 0.46%) was similar to that of the stem. Hot water extracts of the bark of F. angustifolia stumps showed high total phenolic content (33.94 ± 1.43 mg GAE/g DW) and strong antioxidant potential (198.48 ± 3.33 μmol TE/g DW), while toxic metals were not detected. UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis indicated phenylethanoid glycosides as the dominant compounds in the extracts. The analyzed stumps of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. in the “Morović” Forest Administration represent a valuable biomass with potential for further valorization.

1. Introduction

The stem is technically the highest quality part of wood biomass and the preferred raw material for many mechanical and chemical refining processes [1]. Forest exploitation generates large amounts of wood biomass residues (branches and twigs with leaves or bristles, knots, bark, acorns, and stumps), which most often remain in the forest after cutting trees [2]. These residues are considered an important resource for obtaining antioxidant and bioactive molecules [2]. As Walmsley and Godbold (2010) stated, there is the potential for up to 9 million m3 per year of forest chips from stumps [3]. Sawmill processing generates additional residues, such as bark, which can represent 13–21 wt% of dry wood, depending on the species [4]. The stump and root possess a higher proportion of bark compared to the stem [5]. Despite the substantial annual generation of forest wood waste biomass, the utilization of products derived from this source remains limited.
The chemical properties of the xylem of stems and stumps are relatively similar, but the content of extractive substances in stumps is slightly higher [1,6,7]. Biomaterials such as forest residues and by-products from primary wood processing, which have a high extractive content, are often used for energy production [8]. For many years, stumps have been used as fuel, for tar production, and as building material for ships [3,9,10]. Aligned with the European Union’s circular bioeconomy strategy, enhancing the efficiency and rational use of forest logging residues represents an important future priority [11,12,13]. In recent years, increased attention has been directed toward the utilization of stumps remaining in forests following tree harvesting. While the primary objective was to protect against wooden root rot, this approach also seeks to maximize the utilization of stump biomass and generate valuable commercial products, typically derived from timber [14,15]. Stumps could be a carbon reservoir, as well as hydrogen and nitrogen according to Damyanova and Dimitrova (2023) in their research on the dead wood of beech (Fagus Sylvatica L.) forests [16]. The heating value of stumps, which correlates with lignin, carbohydrate and extractive content, was the same or in some cases higher than in the stem, branches or root of some species of the Pinus, Picea, Betula, Alnus, and Populus genus as stated in the work of Nurmi (1997) [17]. Some previous research indicates that stumps and roots, especially of conifers, represent a reservoir of secondary metabolites, primarily polyphenols, tannins, lignans, resin acids, diterpenoids, sterols, and stilbenoids, with protective, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties [8,18]. For example, Latva-Mäenpää (2017) found that the bark of stumps of Picea abies contains stilbenoid glucosides and also free stilbenoids (astringin, isorhapontin, piceid, piceatannol, and isorhapontigenin). Catechin and β-sitosterol were also identified. Wood samples of Scots pine stump had stilbenoids, pinosylvin and pinosylvin monomethyl ether, while the bark contained catechin [18]. In Picea abies stump hearts, Halmemies et al. (2023) identified lignans hydroxymatairesinol, conidendrin, lignan A, iso-hydroxymatairesinol, lariciresinol, and isolariciresinol. Stilbene glucosides were also found in stump hearts and crushed samples of stumps, where the bark and xylem were mixed together [8]. Many authors have found that the stumps of P. abies contain larger amounts of resin acid than stems, knotwood or roots [19]. It has also been found that Eucalyptus globulus stumps represent an important source for the extraction of bioactive molecules with antioxidant and antimicrobial effects, especially polyphenols, including flavonoids, which are well-known bioactive compounds [6].
Therefore, the use of stumps for other purposes, such as the extraction of bioactive molecules, is expected to gradually increase, thereby increasing the demand for stump cutting. Nevertheless, these practices raise concerns about the impacts of stump removal on forest ecosystems, particularly with respect to soil quality and forestry sustainability [7,8]. Removing stumps can significantly alter the soil structure (therefore increasing soil erosion), cause changes in the natural carbon cycle, cause soil demineralization and acidification through leaching, and cause changes in the flora and fauna that use stumps as substrates [3,9]. Stump harvesting is mainly carried out with old technology—large excavators—often largely disturbing soil properties. This process, together with collection, transportation and conversion of stumps into a desirable product, indicates a heightened level of forest management [3,10]. On the other hand, in areas where stump harvesting is not practiced, the natural decay of stumps caused by root rot fungi can result in significant annual wood loss [14]. Insects involved in the decomposition of tree stumps can elevate the mortality risk of newly planted trees [9]. In addition, leaving a large number of stumps in the forest reduces the possibility of planting new trees and reforestation, as sufficient land space is necessary for the adequate development of new trees [10].
Given these opposing perspectives—the valorization of stumps as a raw material versus their role in ecosystem functioning and soil maintenance—the importance of understanding the chemical composition of stumps, which has not been sufficiently researched, is highlighted. However, the chemical composition of the xylem and bark of the stump of most deciduous species, such as narrow-leaved ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon), has not been sufficiently investigated.
Narrow-leaved ash belongs to the Oleaceae family, genus Fraxinus, which includes 70 tree species. It is abundant in Europe (Mediterranean and Pannonia), West Asia, and North Africa [20,21]. In the Balkans and Pannonia, it is primarily located in plains, riverbanks, and floodplains near the major rivers [22]. The European program of forest genetic resources (EUFORGEN) identified narrow-leaved ash as one of 27 noble deciduous tree species [23]. Narrow-leaved ash is a medium-strong wood with average malleability, suitable for making pulp, plywood, laminated veneer lumber, and glued laminated timber [22].
According to Zhao et al. (2025), 326 compounds were isolated and identified to date from the Fraxinus genus [24]. Many of these compounds belong to polyphenols, which are important bioactive molecules of trees. Their chemical structure includes more than 8000 hydroxyphenyl compounds, and they range from simple molecules, such as phenolic acids, to highly polymerized structures like condensed tannins and lignins [25]. Most polyphenols are composed of fundamental building blocks derived from simpler phenolic moieties, which give them specific biochemical properties, such as the capacity to form complexes with proteins and metals and the ability to react with peroxy radicals by pulling the easily removed hydrogen from their hydroxyl group, creating a more stable radical oxidant that can help scavenge reactive oxygen species [25,26,27]. Nykolov et al. (1993) identified the coumarins esculin, esculetin, fraxin, and fraxetin in F. ornus bark [28]. From the stem bark of F. chinensis, 26 bioactive compounds were isolated, such as oleuropein, fraxetin, aesculetin, aesculetin dimethyl esterisoscopoletin, tyrosol, calceolarioside B, verbascoside, isoacteoside, and lugrandoside [29,30]. Jensen and Nielsen (1976) isolated derivatives of fraxidin, fraxinol, and 10-hydroxyligstroside from F. excelsior bark [31]. From the bark of F. rhynchophylla Hance, coumarins and secoiridoid glucosides such as esculetin, esculin, ligstroside, and oleuropein were isolated [32]. From the fresh fruiting leaves of F. uhdei, Shen et al. (1993) isolated 10-hydroxyligustroside and verbascoside, fraxuhdoside, and insularoside [33]. Kiss et al. (2020) identified 64 compounds in F. excelsior leaves, including phenylethanoids, flavonoids, phenolic acid derivatives, lignans, iridoids, and secoiridoids. Among these compounds, the major ones detected were ligstroside, verbascoside, oleuropein, chlorogenic acid, and quercetin-3-O-rutinoside [34]. In the leaves and bark of F. angustifolia, Kasmi et al. (2021) determined coumarins (esculetin, esculin, fraxin, fraxetin, fraxidin), secoiridoids (oleuropein, oleoside, ligustroside), phenylethanoids (verbascoside, isoverbascoside, calceolariosides), phenolic acids (caffeic acid, protocatechic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, hydroxytyrosol), and flavonoids (rutin, nicotiflorin, quercitin-3-O-glucoside, kaempherol-O-glucoside) [35]. Many of these compounds have antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and anti-hepatotoxic activities. They inhibit enzymatic activity, while esculin aids in skin regeneration, and coumarins from narrow-leaved ash bark prevent photodynamic cell damage [36]. The bark of narrow-leaved ash has anti-inflammatory properties and is used as an antioxidant, diuretic, and astringent for digestive health [37]. Recent research has shown significant the antimutagenic and antigenotoxic activity of narrow-leaved ash bark and leaves [35,38]. After air-drying, bark is used in the pharmaceutical industry and in cosmetic preparations [23]. In the study conducted by Ahmane et al. (2019), it was noted that esculin and calcelarioside, which were isolated from the bark of narrow-leaved ash, demonstrate significant anti-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidase activity in xanthine oxidoreductase. This suggests that the bark is a valuable source of therapeutic compounds [39]. Bougelid et al. (2020) found that the ethanol extract of narrow-leaved ash bark showed significant antimutagenic and antigenotoxic properties, while chloroform/water bark extract showed selective cytotoxicity towards cancer cells [38].
To investigate the possible usage of stumps, the chemical composition and presence of bioactive compounds of narrow-leaved ash stumps from Morović were analyzed. The content of the basic chemical components of the xylem and bark of the stumps of narrow-leaved ash was determined, and due to the potential presence of bioactive compounds, special attention was devoted to the water extracts. The content of the total polyphenols and the antioxidant activity of the extracts were determined. In addition, individual bioactive components present in hot water extracts as well as potentially toxic elements were identified.
Comprehensive characterization of lignocellulosic biomass requires the application of complementary analytical approaches due to the complexity of its chemical composition. Spectrophotometric methods allow a quick assessment of the total content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant potential, while chromatographic techniques, such as HPTLC and UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS, provide a more detailed insight into the distribution and chemical profile of secondary metabolites. In particular, HPTLC coupled with DPPH• derivatization enables the visualization of radical-scavenging zones directly on the chromatographic plate, providing information on the distribution of zones exhibiting DPPH radical-scavenging activity within complex extracts. ICP-OES analysis additionally enables a reliable assessment of the mineral composition of the biomass. Although individual methods have certain limitations in terms of selectivity and identification of compounds, their combined application enables a more comprehensive chemical characterization and assessment of the potential of lignocellulosic residues for further valorization.
Despite the importance of Fraxinus species as a source of lignocellulosic biomass and phenolic compounds, data on the chemical composition and valorization potential of Fraxinus angustifolia stumps are very limited. To the best of our knowledge, this research represents the first integrated chemical characterization of xylem and bark of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon stumps using standardized analysis of lignocellulosic composition, determination of total phenols and antioxidant activity, HPTLC-DPPH bioautography, UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS profiling, and ICP-OES elemental analysis. The work aimed to evaluate the chemical composition and valorization potential of this type of biomass within the sustainable use of wood biomass.
In this context, hot water extraction is increasingly considered a viable option for modifying and improving wood chip products (e.g., for the production of pellets [40,41], wood plastic composites [42,43], particleboards [44], fiberboards [45] and OSB panels [46]) while simultaneously utilizing the liquid extract phase. This approach is in line with the principles of biorefinery and complete wood biomass utilization, meaning that this manuscript can serve as a useful guideline for future researchers in this field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The wood material was sourced from a sustainably managed forest of the Public Enterprise “Vojvodinašume” (Petrovaradin, Serbia), specifically from the Forest Estate “Sremska Mitrovica”. This enterprise holds a valid Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification (Certificate No. FSC-C021645, valid until August 2028 [47]). Samples of narrow-leaved ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon) stumps were collected from Forest Compartment No. 9 within the “Smogva-Grabova Greda” Forest Management Unit, managed by the Forest Administration “Morović” in the Municipality of Šid (geographical coordinates 44°59′15″ N 19°09′53″ E). The botanical identity and strict geographic origin of the species were officially verified based on the supplier’s forest management registry and further confirmed by the macroscopic features.
Sampling and sample preparation for chemical analysis were carried out in accordance with the standard procedure TAPPI T 257 [48] and ISO 14780 [49] (Figure 1). To ensure the representativeness and repeatability of the findings, samples in the form of 3 cm thick discs were taken in March 2025 from the stumps of three healthy, randomly selected, freshly felled 102-year-old narrow-leaved ash trees, immediately after regular commercial logging operations. The sampled discs were air-dried for three months under laboratory conditions and protected from light, after which the bark was manually separated from the wood. Following separation, the xylem discs were cut cross-sectionally along their diameter into four quarters. To maintain the original proportions of sapwood and heartwood, two opposite quarters of each xylem disc, as well as the entire quantity of bark, were coarsely chopped manually to obtain smaller fragments. After grinding with a hammer mill (Culatti AG micro mill DFH 48, Zürich, Switzerland), samples were pooled and thoroughly homogenized to prepare uniform samples before being sieved. Particle size fractionation of the ground material was performed via mechanical sieving using a standard set of wire cloth test sieves mounted on a laboratory sieving machine (JEL, J. Engelsmann AG, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany), operating for 10 min to ensure complete and reproducible separation of the target fraction (0.5–1.0 mm) [48]. To ensure sample representativeness, the fractionated wood and bark samples were reduced to the final analytical mass using the manual coning and quartering method on a clean, antistatic substrate, following the guidelines of the ISO 14780 standard [49]. After being air-dried at room temperature to reach a stable moisture content of approximately 10–12%, the particle fraction of 0.5–1 mm was stored in sealed glass containers for subsequent analysis [48]. This yielded two prepared samples: xylem and bark.
The moisture content of the samples was measured by drying them in a laboratory dryer at 105 ± 2 °C until a constant mass was achieved [50]. The moisture content of the samples of xylem and bark was 8.07 ± 0.02% and 7.02 ± 0.02%, respectively.

2.2. Chemicals and Materials

All chemicals and reagents for this study were sourced from commercial suppliers. Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (for microscopy) was from CARLO ERBA Reagents (Cornaredo, Italy), and the standard of gallic acid (99.97%) was from BLD PHARMATECH GmbH (Reinbek, Germany). Sulfuric acid (≥97%), nitric acid (65%), acetic acid (glacial), sodium carbonate (anhydrous, ≥99.5%), polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000, and silica gel 60 (Art. 105461) HPTLC glass plates were supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Toluene (p.a., >99%) and ethanol (p.a., 96%) were obtained from Centrohem d.o.o. (Stara Pazova, Serbia). 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH, ≥95%) free radical, p-anisaldehyde, and 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate (NP reagent) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). Sodium acetate trihydrate G.R. (≥99%) was purchased from Lach-Ner, S.R.O. (Neratovice, Czech Republic). 6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic Acid (Trolox, ≥98%) was supplied by Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol (LC–MS grade, ≥99.9%) and water (LC–MS purity) were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co. (Ward Hill, MA, USA). Formic acid (HPLC grade, ≥98%) was purchased from CARLO ERBA Reagents (Val-de-Reuil, France).

2.3. Chemical Composition Determination

Cellulose content was determined by the Kürschner–Hoffer method. The sample was treated with a mixture of 65% nitric acid and 96% ethanol in a 1:4 (v/v) ratio in a water bath (WKP-14, ViMS-elektrik d.o.o., Tršić, Serbia) maintained at the boiling temperature of the reaction mixture. This reflux treatment was performed in successive 1 h cycles (two for wood and three for bark) to dissolve lignin and hemicelluloses. The remaining cellulose residue was filtered, washed to neutrality with distilled water, dried at 105 ± 2 °C to a constant mass, and quantified gravimetrically [51]. Lignin content was quantified by combining the gravimetric method for acid-insoluble lignin and the spectrophotometric method for acid-soluble lignin. Acid-insoluble (Klason) lignin was isolated via two-stage hydrolysis of extractive-free samples using 72% sulfuric acid at 20 ± 1 °C for 2 h in the first step, followed by dilution to a 3% acid concentration and secondary hydrolysis under reflux in a sand bath (Sutjeska, Belgrade, Serbia) at the boiling temperature of the mixture for 4 h. The insoluble precipitate was filtered, washed to neutrality with hot distilled water, dried to a constant mass at 105 ± 2 °C, and quantified gravimetrically [52]. Meanwhile, the acid-soluble lignin fraction was quantified by measuring the absorbance of the supernatant obtained prior to filtration, at a wavelength of 205 nm with an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, Altrincham, UK) [53]. Organic-soluble extractives were quantified using a 150 mL toluene:ethanol (2:1, v/v) mixture. After 8 h of extraction in a Soxhlet apparatus in a sand bath, the toluene–ethanol extractive content was determined by drying and weighing the residue after solvent evaporation; concurrently, this phase yielded the extractive-free samples required for subsequent lignin analysis [54]. The hot-water-soluble extractives were determined via extraction in a boiling water bath. After 3 h of extraction, the resulting water extracts were collected and stored at 4 °C until further analysis. The remaining wood and bark residues were separated by filtration, washed, and dried to a constant mass at 105 ± 2 °C. The water-soluble extractive yield was calculated gravimetrically based on the mass loss of the extracted residue relative to the oven-dry mass of the initial sample [55,56]. Finally, the inorganic fraction (ash content) was determined gravimetrically by weighing the residue after complete combustion at 900 ± 25 °C in a muffle furnace (ViMS-elektrik d.o.o., Tršić, Serbia) until a constant mass was reached [57]. All analyses were conducted in triplicate (three independent analytical replicates), and the results are expressed on an oven-dry weight (DW) basis and presented as mean values with standard deviations. The content of hemicelluloses, including other unquantified components, was determined approximately by subtracting the sum of all quantified components (cellulose, lignin, total extractives, and ash) from the total sample mass (100%). The results are shown as histograms created using Microsoft Excel 2010, version 14.0.4760.1000.

2.4. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

TPC was determined for extractives soluble in hot water using the method of Aksić et al. (2023) [58]. In the 0.5 mL of diluted water extracts (1000 µg/mL), 2 mL of 10% (v/v) Folin-Ciocalteu reagent was added. After waiting for 3 min, 2.5 mL of 10% Na2CO3 was added and left in the dark for 30 min. Absorbance was measured in quartz cuvettes at 765 nm with an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. TPC was read from the calibration curve obtained with different concentrations of gallic acid (10, 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/mL) and expressed as gallic acid equivalents per g dry weight (mg GAE/g DW). The obtained calibration curve had the correlation coefficient R2 = 0.999. Sample replicates were tested to maintain a relative standard deviation below 10%. Analysis was performed in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean values with standard deviations.

2.5. Antioxidant Potential of Water Extracts Determined Spectrophotometrically

Water is a good solvent for polyphenols, which are often characterized by antioxidant activity. Thus, the antioxidant activity of narrow-leaved ash stump water extracts was determined by the scavenging capacity of the DPPH free radical using the method of Smailagić (2019) [59]. DPPH• solution was prepared by mixing 186 µM of freshly prepared ethanol solution of DPPH• and acetate buffer (pH 5) in a ratio of 2:1 v/v in a volumetric flask, which was protected from light with aluminum foil. In 0.2 mL of diluted water extract (1000 µg/mL), 2.8 mL of DPPH• solution was added, and after incubation for 90 min in the dark, the decrease of absorbance was measured at 525 nm with an Evolution 300 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. The calibration curve was established using a Trolox solution in ethanol with different concentrations in a range of 50–450 µM. DPPH radical scavenging capacity of samples was expressed as μmol of Trolox Equivalent (TE) per g of dry weight (μmol TE/g DW). The obtained calibration curve had the correlation coefficient R2 = 0.995. Sample replicates were tested to maintain a relative standard deviation below 10%. Analysis was performed in triplicate, and the results are presented as mean values with standard deviations.

2.6. Antioxidant Potential of Water Extracts Determined by HPTLC

The DPPH method using high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) was used to investigate the antioxidant capacity of water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps. HPTLC is a quick and cost-effective analytical method that enables the simultaneous analysis of several samples with minimal solvent use [60]. A particular advantage of this method is the possibility of direct visualization and assessment of the biological activity of the separated components on the plate, which makes it very suitable for the screening and comparative analysis of complex plant extracts, including the assessment of their antioxidant potential.
A 30 μL aliquot of extract (20 mg/mL) was applied to HPTLC glass plates with silica gel 60 F254, as 6 mm wide bands using a CAMAG Linomat 5 (Muttenz, Switzerland). The band was placed 8 mm from the bottom edge of the plate, with a minimum distance of 12 mm from both sides. Chromatographic development was carried out using the mobile phase ethyl-acetate:water:formic acid (80:10:10; v/v/v) [61] in a saturated Twin Trough chamber. The chamber was saturated with the mobile phase for 20 min prior to development, with a solvent migration distance of 70 mm. The resulting HPTLC chromatogram was documented under white light conditions, and images were recorded in TIFF format.
Antioxidant activity was determined by the DPPH method, by immersing the plate in a 0.05% (w/v) methanolic solution of DPPH• for 1–2 s to completely coat the plate and then incubating it for 30 min in the dark. Antioxidant activity was visible as bright zones on a purple background under white light [62].

2.7. UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS) analysis was performed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC+ system equipped with a diode array (DAD) detector and an LCQ Fleet ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, California, USA). The chromatographic column was Hypersil Gold C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm) from the same producer, set at 25 °C. The mobile phase at flow rate 0.25 mL/min consisted of (A) 0.1% formic acid in water and (B) 0.1% formic acid in methanol with the following eluting gradient program: first two minutes, from 10% to 30% (B); 2–4 min, 30% to 35% (B); 4–7 min, from 35% to 40% (B); 7–8 min, 40–60% (B); 8–11 min, from 60% to 90% (B); an isocratic run at 90% (B) from 11 to 15 min; for 15–15.01 min, from 90% to 10% (B); and an isocratic run with 10% (B) to the 20th min. For the analysis, dry extracts were dissolved in a water: methanol (9:1, v/v) mixture to a concentration of 10 μg/mL, and the injection volume of the samples was 4 μL.
The DAD-detector was set at a total spectral range between 190 and 700 nm. The mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was performed using an LCQ 3D-ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, California, USA) with electrospray ionization (ESI) in the negative and positive ion mode using both full MS between m/z 100 and m/z 1000 and a data-dependent scan method for the precursor ions with a collision-induced dissociation (CID) set at 30 eV in a stream of He. The ESI–source parameters were set as follows: sheath and auxiliary gas were nitrogen, set at 32 and 8 flow arbitrary units; capillary temperature 350 °C for both modes; source voltage 4.5 kV and 5.0 V, capillary voltage −41 V and 49 V, and tube lens voltage −95 V and 115 V for negative and positive ESI-MS modes, respectively.
Instrument control, data acquisition, and data analysis were conducted with Xcalibur software (version 2.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The compounds were tentatively identified based on their retention times and elution order, available UV–Vis spectra from the DAD detector, MS spectra with the corresponding molecular ion peaks ([M-H], [M + H]+) and their corresponding adduct ions ([M-H + HCOOH], [M + Na]+, [M + NH4]+), and the characteristic ion fragmentation of selected peaks (MS/MS spectra) from UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS chromatograms (Figures S1–S4). The corresponding chromatography and spectral data were compared with the available literature. Compound identification was considered tentative due to the absence of authentic standards for all detected compounds and was based on the combined interpretation of chromatographic behavior, UV–Vis spectral characteristics, and MS/MS fragmentation patterns.

2.8. ICP-OES Analysis

The content of macro- and microelements in water extracts of xylem and bark stumps was determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma—Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) (ARCOS FHE12, SPECTRO Analytical Instruments, Kleve, Germany). The operating conditions of the ICP-OES instrument and the parameters for determining the concentrations of selected elements are given in Table S1.
The water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps were diluted with HPLC-grade distilled water, filtered through 0.45 μm membrane filters, and directly analyzed by ICP-OES. No additional dilution or digestion procedure was applied since the analysis was performed on water extracts. HPLC-grade water used for sample preparation was analyzed as a method blank, and all monitored elements in the blank were below the corresponding limits of detection. The carrier gas was Argon with a grade of 5.0 (99.999% purity). Calibration solutions were prepared by diluting standard solutions, ensuring that the concentrations of the standards used for the calibration curves covered the expected concentration range of the analyzed elements. The selected analytical wavelengths, the correlation coefficient (R), the linearity ranges (LR), and limits of detection (LOD) for the analyzed elements are summarized in Table S2.
To evaluate the safety of the extracts, the concentrations of the analyzed elements (μg/mL) were compared with the Permitted Concentration Limits (PCLs, μg/mL) for both oral and cutaneous routes [63]. In accordance with the International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Elemental Impurities (ICH Q3D) guideline, the PCL values (oral and cutaneous) were calculated based on the Permitted Daily Exposures (PDEs, μg/day) for elemental impurities, assuming a conservative maximum daily product intake of 10 g [64]. Since the samples were water extracts, a density of approximately 1.0 g/mL was considered to convert the daily mass intake of 10 g into an equivalent volume of 10 mL/day, enabling a direct comparison of the regulatory limits (PCLs) with the experimental values expressed in μg/mL. For elements that were not detected in the extracts, the instrumental limits of detection (LODs) of the ICP-OES method (Table S2) were used as the upper concentration estimates for comparison with the corresponding permitted concentration limits (PCLs).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Composition

Analysis of the chemical composition of narrow-leaved ash stumps from Morović showed that there are differences in the content of structural biopolymers between xylem and bark (Figure 2). The stump xylem contains a high proportion of cellulose and lignin, while bark, on the other hand, contains less cellulose and hemicelluloses but more lignin, which is in line with general trends in hardwoods. These variations in chemical composition between xylem and bark are driven by their specific biological and physiological functions within the living tree. While the xylem provides mechanical support and water conductivity, which accounts for the predominance of structural carbohydrates, primarily cellulose, the bark serves a predominantly protective function against environmental factors. This protective role is reflected in its higher proportions of lignin, suberin and non-structural compounds [5,63,65,66].
In addition to the clear differences in chemical composition between wood and bark, it is well established that the chemical profile of the xylem itself is not uniform; rather, it is subject to variations in both axial (along the stem height) and radial (from the pith to the periphery) directions. These variations are related to tree age, the transition from juvenile to mature wood, and heartwood formation, which is accompanied by the deposition of secondary metabolites (extractives, particularly polyphenols). Furthermore, wood formation is strongly influenced by both genetic factors and environmental conditions (such as photoperiod, nutrient availability, precipitation, and hydrological conditions, as well as mechanical stresses that induce reaction wood formation), which further contributes to the variability in chemical composition between trees from different localities [67,68].
In accordance with the evident variability in chemical composition, previous studies have noted that the cellulose content in wood changes depending on the position in both axial and radial directions, as well as with the age of the tree. Popović et al. (2016) established that at 1.3 m, the cellulose content in the 10-year-old juvenile wood of narrow-leaved ash from Morović (45.46%) was lower than in the mature wood of the same species aged 70–73 years (46.83%) [69]. Conversely, Yalcin and Sahin (2015) reported higher cellulose content (53.46% at a height of 1.5 m) for 22-year-old narrow-leaved ash from Turkey [70]. This higher value could be a consequence of specific growth conditions or the presence of tension wood, which is characterized by a high cellulose content and is frequently present in young trees [71]. Bodirlau et al. (2007) also observed that the cellulose content in oak stemwood is related to its axial and radial position [72]. These variations in cellulose, as well as in other wood constituents along both axial and radial directions, result from the varying proportions of juvenile and mature wood, alongside the presence of the extractive-rich heartwood that occupies the central parts of the stem. At a height of 1.3 m, the sample showed a trend of increasing cellulose content from the pith toward the cambium. In the axial direction, within the inner (0–40 annual rings) and outer (70–80 annual rings) sections of the stem, the cellulose content increases up to a certain height (from 1.3 m to 8 m) before eventually decreasing (from 8 m to 15 m). In contrast, the central growth rings (40–70 annual rings) display a steady decreasing trend in the axial direction from 1.3 m to 15 m [72]. Popović et al. (2016) also established a decreasing trend in cellulose content along the axial direction, dropping from 45.46% (1.3 m) to 44.61% (1/2 tree height) and 43.99% (3/4 tree height) in juvenile narrow-leaved ash wood. A similar trend was observed in the mature wood of the same species, decreasing from 46.83% (at 1.3 m) to 46.14% (1/2 tree height) and 44.85% (3/4 tree height) [69]. Nevertheless, when comparing the cellulose content in the xylem of narrow-leaved ash stumps presented in Figure 2 to the cellulose content in the wood of a 70–73-year-old mature tree from the same locality reported by Popović et al. (2016) (46.83% at 1.3 m) (Table 1), it can be seen that the cellulose content in the investigated xylem stumps is slightly lower. This lower cellulose content within the stump zone can be attributed to the accumulation of extractive compounds, which naturally concentrate over time in the oldest basal parts of the tree and mathematically reduce the relative ratio of structural carbohydrates. Nevertheless, the cellulose content in the xylem of narrow-leaved ash stumps is within the limits of the values stated in the literature for the genus Fraxinus (Table 1), which range from 38.22 to 49.24% for F. americana L. Marsh and from 40.86 to 46.77% for F. excelsior L. Oleaceae [73], as well as the value of 43.81% that Bodîrlău et al. (2007) reported for 102-year-old F. excelsior L. at a height of 1.3 m. In this context, it can be concluded that the cellulose content of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps does not differ from the commercial parts of trees of the genus Fraxinus.
Bark is less important than xylem and is usually treated as waste, so it is less studied, and it is difficult to find data on its chemical composition for most wood species. Cellulose content in the bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, presented in Figure 2, is much lower than in the xylem, which is in accordance with the cellulose content ratio of bark and xylem stated in the work of Pásztory et al. (2016), who noted that wood contains 40–50%, phloem 18–25%, and outer bark 3–17% cellulose [66].
The content of hemicelluloses, including other unquantified components of the xylem of narrow-leaved ash stumps as presented in Figure 2, was lower than the hemicellulose content reported in the work of Mazri et al. (2022), where they found 28.38% in sapwood and 27.60% in heartwood (Table 1) [74]. It is also lower than the hemicellulose content of 24.93% in stemwood reported in the work of Yalcin and Sahin (2015) (Table 1) [70]. The content of hemicelluloses, including other unquantified components, is still within the limits stated for hardwood hemicelluloses by Pettersen (1984) and Sjostrom (1993), which range from 15% to 30% for glucuronoxylans and 2% to 5% of dry wood for glucomannans [64,75]. However, it should be noted that the content of hemicelluloses, including other unquantified components, is calculated approximately, by subtracting the sum of cellulose, lignin, total extractives, and ash content from the total mass (100%), where a portion of the soluble hemicellulose components may be present in the water extract, along with some water-soluble minerals. Pásztory et al. (2016) state that the polysaccharide content is much higher in wood (62.8 to 70.6%) than in bark (44.1 to 47.6%) [66]. However, as we can see from Figure 2, there is an extremely low content of hemicelluloses, including other components, in the bark of the ash stumps. Concurrently, the hot-water extractive yield is remarkably high (Figure 2). This strongly indicates that a substantial portion of polysaccharides, such as easily water-soluble hemicelluloses and pectins, along with certain water-soluble mineral matter, likely dissolved during the hot-water extraction process and was consequently quantified within the hot-water extractive fraction. This mass transfer to the extract fraction may explain the underestimated and unexpectedly low calculated value of hemicellulose (including other components) content in the bark. To analyze the differences in hemicellulose content between stump and stemwood, it is crucial to further investigate the monosaccharide contents of narrow-leaved ash stumps, specifically xylose, mannose, glucose, and glucuronic acid, which are the primary constituents of hardwood hemicelluloses [74,76].
The lignin content of narrow-leaved ash stump xylem, presented in Figure 2, is within the limits for the stemwood, from 21.40% for acid-insoluble (Klason) lignin [70] to 25.53% for acid-insoluble (Runkel) lignin [77], and is close to the total lignin content value of 24.70% (at 1.3 m) reported by Popović et al. (2016) for this species from the same locality (Table 1). Mazri et al. (2021) report a somewhat lower total lignin content of 21.9% (sapwood) and 23.4% (heartwood) (Table 1) [74].
Table 1. Chemical composition of certain Fraxinus species, represented in %.
Table 1. Chemical composition of certain Fraxinus species, represented in %.
Age (Years)Sampling Height on the Tree (m)Cellulose (%)Hemicelluloses (%)Lignin (%)Extractives (Organic Solution) (%)Extractives (Hot Water) (%)Ash (%)Reference
F. angustifolia
stem wood70–731.346.83 24.704.394.44–5.590.36[69]
221.553.46
(sapwood)
24.9321.40 (acid-insoluble, Klason)4.185.140.83[70]
62–64 25.53 (acid-insoluble, Runkel)4.90–8.0811.230.44–0.77[77]
272.5 28.38 (sapwood)
27.60 (heartwood)
21.9 (sapwood)
23.4 (heartwood)
0.83[74]
stem bark 5 [39]
5.85 [38]
F. americana, L. Marsh.
stem wood 38.22–49.24 [73]
F. excelsior L.
stem wood 40.86–46.77 [73]
1021.343.81 [72]
As shown in Figure 2, the lignin content in the bark of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps is equal to or greater than that found in the stem bark of other hardwood species (willow 37.3%; oak 32.67–38%; beech 24.63–34.04%; poplar 28.17–36.04%) [78,79,80,81,82,83]. The high content of lignin increases the heating value of lignocellulose and makes it suitable for energy production. In the investigation of Dibdiakova et al. (2014), it was stated that the bark of some hardwood trees has higher effective calorific values than other tree biomass, such as stems, branches, stump xylem, roots, and foliage [84]. Nosek et al. (2016) reported that birch bark has a significantly higher calorific value than xylem, by roughly 4.28 MJ/kg [85].
The extractive contents of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stump xylem, presented in Figure 3, were higher than the extractive content in the upper parts of the wood, as stated in some studies. Yalcin and Sahin (2015) found that the hot water extractive content of narrow-leaved ash xylem sampled at 1.5 m height was 5.14%, while Popović et al. (2016) reported a hot water extractive content of 5.59%, 4.44%, and 5.08% in xylem samples taken at 1.3 m above the ground and 1/2 and 3/4 of total tree height, respectively [69,70] (Table 1). However, Elmas (2011) states a value of 11.23% for hot water extractives, which may be due to external factors (Table 1). According to Popović et al. (2016), this high content of hot water extractives in the lower part of a tree is because water, in addition to primary metabolites, also dissolves secondary metabolites, such as polyphenols, hydrolyzable tannins, and pectins [69], whose concentration is higher in the lower parts of a tree [86]. The toluene-ethanol extractive content of narrow-leaved ash stump xylem is higher than the content of these substances, at 4.39% (at 1.3 m) as reported by Popović et al. (2016), and is within the limits of 4.18–8.08% reported by Yalcin and Sahin (2015) and Elmas (2011) for the ethanol-benzene extract of this species in Turkey (Table 1). Considering that organic solvents dissolve primarily secondary substances, and hot water, as stated before, also dissolves some primary substances, we can conclude that the analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps are much richer in extractives than stemwood, which is in accordance with the existing literature [86]. Comparing the extractive content of the bark and xylem in our study (shown in Figure 3), we can see that the extractive content of the bark is higher than that of the xylem of the narrow-leaved ash stump. The bark has a protective role and is known for its high content of extractives [87], so this result is expected. The extractive content of narrow-leaved ash stumps’ bark was also much higher than the extraction yield of the ethanolic extracts obtained in some studies for narrow-leaved ash tree bark, which ranges from 5% [39] to 5.85% [38] (Table 1). In their research, Bougellid et al. (2020) and Ahmane et al. (2019) found that the bark of narrow-leaved ash is rich in bioactive phenolic compounds, including tannins and flavonoids. Therefore, the high content of hot water extractives in the analyzed stumps’ bark deserves further research.
The mineral material content of the narrow-leaved ash stumps is represented as ash content in Figure 3. When compared to the studies by Elmas (2011), Yalcin and Sahin (2015), and Mazri (2022) which reported ash contents of 0.77% (62 to 64-year-old trees), 0.44% (33 to 36-year-old trees) [77], and 0.83% [70,74] in stemwood, we observe that the ash content in the xylem of the narrow-leaved ash stumps is similar or lower (Table 1). However, the ash content of stumps is slightly higher than in the tree (0.36%) of this species from the same locality, which is reported by Popović et al. (2016) (Table 1). However, the ash content is higher in stump bark than in stump xylem, consistent with findings reported in previous studies and the existing literature [66,86].

3.2. TPC and Antioxidant Capacity Determined Spectrophotometrically

Considering the high content of water extractives of the analyzed narrow-leaved ash bark and xylem stumps of 6.48% and 17.30%, respectively, and the fact that polyphenols, which are often linked with antioxidative capacity, are water-soluble, the TPC and antioxidant potential of water extracts of the bark and xylem of narrow-leaved ash stumps were investigated.
TPC in the water extracts of the bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, presented in Table 2, is higher than TPC in the water extracts of stemwood bark (20.53 mg GAE/g DW and 21.86 mg GAE/g DW) reported in the work of Touhami et al. (2017) [88]. This higher content of polyphenols in lower parts of a tree is in accordance with some previous studies and the existing literature [6,86,89]. TPC in hot water extracts of F. angustifolia stump bark is even higher than TPC in ethanolic extracts of stemwood bark (22.85 mg GAE/g DW and 24.84 mg GAE/g DW) reported in the investigation of Touhami et al. (2017) and ethanolic extracts of F. angustifolia bark (25.15 ± 0.70 mg GAE/g DW) reported in the work of Azib et al. (2020) [88,90]. On the other hand, the TPC of stump bark in this investigation is similar to the TPC of 80% aqueous methanol extracts (33.89 mg GAE/g DW) of F. agustifolia bark found by Tahirović and Bašić (2016) [21]. These comparisons add importance to the water extracts of stump bark as a source of polyphenols, knowing that plant extraction with ethanol, methanol, acetone, and ethyl acetate results in a higher yield of polyphenols [91,92,93,94]. To date, there has been no study on TPC in the xylem of narrow-leaved ash, likely due to the low content of polyphenols.
In our study, we observed that the antioxidant capacity of stump bark water extracts is much higher than that of stump xylem water extracts (Table 2). Unfortunately, we could not find any studies on the antioxidant capacity of F. angustifolia xylem or bark toward DPPH, expressed as the amount of Trolox Equivalent per sample, to compare with our results. This finding requires further investigation to identify components of water extracts from the xylem of narrow-leaved ash stumps that contribute to its scavenging capacity.

3.3. Antioxidant Potential of Water Extracts by HPTLC–DPPH• Scavenging Assay

When the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of water extracts from the xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps was examined using the HPTLC–DPPH• free radical scavenging assay, several zones of activity were observed. On the HPTLC plate, zones with DPPH radical-scavenging activity are expressed as yellow zones on a purple background. The water extract of bark showed higher antioxidant activity, while significantly weaker activity was recorded in the water extract of xylem (Figure 4). These findings are in agreement with the results obtained by the spectrophotometric DPPH assay.
The water extract of the bark shows more pronounced DPPH radical-scavenging activity, while significantly weaker activity was observed in the water extract of xylem (Figure 4). A complex and rich chromatographic profile containing zones with DPPH radical-scavenging activity and different chromatographic characteristics was observed [95]. At lower RF values (~0.08–0.10), very polar compounds with DPPH radical-scavenging activity are noticed, which may include highly polar phenolic constituents based on their chromatographic behavior [96]. In the RF region of 0.15–0.20, zones indicating moderately polar constituents with DPPH radical-scavenging activity are observed, which may be associated with phenolic acid derivatives based on their chromatographic characteristics, and require further confirmation with reference standards [96]. In the middle RF range, zones at ~0.29–0.30, ~0.40, and ~0.47–0.48 are observed, indicating the presence of an average to lower amount of polar constituent compounds. The lowest zone may correspond to more polar constituents, while the higher zones may correspond to fewer polar derivatives and related compounds. The presence of prominent zones with DPPH radical-scavenging activity in this intermediate polarity region is highly consistent with phenolic compounds, including phenolic glycosides, which may include phenylethanoid glycoside-type compounds such as verbascoside and forsythioside derivatives. These compounds are known for their exceptional antioxidant activity due to the presence of caffeoyl and hydroxytyrosol moieties in their structures [97]. A particularly pronounced zone at RF ≈ 0.55–0.60 indicates the presence of fewer polar constituents exhibiting DPPH radical-scavenging activity. Based on their chromatographic behavior, these zones may be associated with fewer polar phenolic compounds; however, their chemical identity cannot be confirmed solely based on RF values. In the higher RF region (RF ≥ 0.75), zones corresponding to fewer polar compounds were observed.
In contrast to the bark, the water extract of xylem shows a significantly weaker DPPH radical-scavenging activity, as observed in the HPTLC–DPPH assay (Figure 4). In the region of RF ≈ 0.08–0.10, a weak zone with DPPH radical-scavenging activity corresponding to very polar constituents was detected. The most pronounced zone with DPPH radical-scavenging activity was located at RF ≈ 0.25–0.30, corresponding to moderately polar constituents.

3.4. UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS Analysis

UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis of the water extracts of xylem and bark of stumps of narrow-leaved ash enabled the identification of a wide range of secondary metabolites. Several classes of compounds were tentatively identified, with phenylethanoid glycosides (such as verbascoside, β-hydroxyverbascoside, forsythoside, caffeoylverbascoside), as well as phenolic acids (such as malic acid, quinic acid, caffeic acid derivatives), flavonoids, secoiridoids, and lignans (Table 3). These results provide insight into the chemical profile of the extracts and the possible potential value of F. angustifolia stump biomass in biotechnological and phytotherapeutic applications.
Based on Table 3, it can be seen that phenylethanoid glycosides represented a major class of tentatively identified compounds in the water extract of xylem and bark from narrow-leaved ash stumps in both negative and positive ionization modes. Verbascoside and related phenylethanoid glycosides were tentatively identified among the most prominent chromatographic signals, with peaks detected at retention times of 8.58 and 9.05 min and the molecular ion [M–H] at m/z 623. Their MS/MS spectra showed dominant fragment ions at m/z 461 (100%) and 315, which are formed by the successive loss of a caffeoyl residue and a sugar unit from the molecule, which represents a typical fragmentation pattern for phenylethanoid glycosides of this type [97,98]. In addition to verbascoside, β-hydroxyverbascoside ([M–H] m/z 639, at retention times 7.01 and 7.75) was also identified, whose molecular mass is 16 Da higher than verbascoside, which indicates an additional hydroxyl group in the molecular structure. Its MS/MS spectrum has characteristic fragments at m/z 621 (100%), 529, and 459, which are consistent with previously described fragmentation pathways for hydroxylated verbascoside derivatives [99]. Other phenylethanoid glycosides with molecular ion m/z 623 were also detected in this fraction, including forsythioside A, H, and I, i.e., acetoside, which in positive ionization mode were registered as [M + H]+, [M + Na]+, and [M+NH4]+ adducts. Their MS/MS spectra showed characteristic fragment ions at m/z 461 (100%) and 315, which further confirms their belonging to this class of compounds [97,98]. Decaffeoylverbascoside (m/z 461, 3.40 min) was also detected, whose MS/MS spectrum contains a dominant fragment at m/z 315 (100%), which corresponds to the hydroxytyrosol-glucoside part of the molecule. Due to the great structural similarity and identical fragmentation patterns, distinguishing individual isomers of phenylethanoid glycosides was possible only based on retention time and data from the literature, and identifications were made tentatively [100]. Hydroxytyrosol derivatives were also detected in the analyzed water extracts of xylem and bark. The compound with molecular ion m/z 315 [M–H] and fragment ions m/z 179, 153, and 135 was tentatively identified as hydroxytyrosol-hexoside at 2.38 min [98]. In addition, several compounds with molecular ion m/z 477 [M–H] were detected in the chromatogram at retention times of 6.86, 8.00, and 8.56 min, tentatively identified as hydroxytyrosol dihexosides. In addition to the most intense peak at m/z 161 (100%), fragments at m/z 431, 341, and 315 were also observed on the chromatogram, which are formed by the loss of sugar units, while fragments at m/z 179, 161, and 135 originate from the fragmentation of the hydroxytyrosol aglycone (Table 3, Figures S1–S4).
As shown in Table 3, some compounds from the group of iridoid glycosides, predominantly secoiridoids, were found in the analyzed extracts. This group of compounds is characterized by a glycosidic unit linked to the iridoid structure, which is recognized in MS/MS spectra by the characteristic loss of a sugar residue. Oleuropein (isomers) was detected at 9.54 and 10.00 min, in both negative and positive ionization modes with [M–H] m/z 539 and [M + H]+ m/z 541. Its MS/MS fragmentation in negative mode is characterized by the appearance of an ion at m/z 377 (100%), resulting from the loss of the hexose unit (162 Da), as well as further fragments at m/z 345, 307 (100%), and 275, which originate from the degradation of the aglycone moiety and are typical of the secoiridoid structure of oleuropein (Table 3, Figures S1–S4) [101]. Ligstroside was detected at 10.80 min, with ion m/z 523 ([M–H]) and dominant fragment m/z 361 (100%), typical for this class of compounds [101]. Oleoside/secologanoside derivative was detected at 9.29 min, with molecular ion m/z 731 and fragments m/z 685, 523, and 345, indicating a more complex structure with more functional groups [101]. Eukovoside was detected at 10.21 min, with an ion of m/z 637 ([M–H]) and a characteristic fragment of m/z 461 (100%), which is formed by the loss of a sugar moiety [102].
In the region of retention times 11.23–11.76 min, two compounds from the lignan class were detected, with characteristic fragmentation patterns indicating the presence of secoisolariciresinol derivatives and their structural isomers, confirming the diversity of the lignan fraction in the analyzed water extracts [98].
The analysis of water extracts identified mainly two sub-groups of phenolic acids, hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids (Table 3). A p-coumaric acid derivative at 0.67 min with characteristic fragment m/z 163 is present, as well as caffeic acid derivatives (caffeoyl and caffeic acid hexoside; 0.75 min and 4.86 min) with fragment m/z 179 (Table 3, Figures S1–S4). Gallic acid derivatives were confirmed by the presence of galloyl hexoside at 1.25 min and 1.80 min with m/z 169 (Table 3, Figures S1–S4). A derivative of coumaroyl-quinic acid at 7.28 min was also detected, as well as free quinic acid at 0.96, which indicates the presence of ester forms (Table 3, Figures S1–S4).
A particularly significant finding of the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis is the detection of phenylethenoid glycosides, including verbascoside and related derivatives, which represented a prominent class of tentatively identified secondary metabolites in the water extracts of F. angustifolia stump biomass. This group of compounds represents the characteristic secondary metabolites of the Fraxinus species, and their structural properties, including the presence of caffeoyl and hydroxytyrosol units, may contribute to the antioxidant potential of the extracts, which is consistent with the antioxidant activity observed in the HPTLC–DPPH assay. However, the contribution of individual compounds remains preliminary because quantitative determination was not performed in the present study.
In addition to phenylethenoid glycosides, the detection of secoiridoids, including oleuropein and related derivatives, as well as phenolic acids and lignans, additionally confirms the complexity of the secondary metabolism of the analyzed biomass. Based on the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis, the biomass of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps from “Morović” contains diverse classes of tentatively identified secondary metabolites, including phenylethanoid glycosides (such as verbascoside and related derivatives), secoiridoids (including oleuropein, ligstroside, and related derivatives), lignans, and phenolic acids. The obtained results indicate that F. angustifolia stump biomass, in addition to its major structural components, is also a potential source of secondary metabolites of interest for further chemical characterization and valorization of forest residues within the concept of biorefining.

3.5. ICP-OES Analysis of Water Extracts

During hot water extraction, a part of the inorganic content of the wood tissue is simultaneously dissolved. These elements are also present in aqueous extracts, depending on their content in the wood tissue and solubility. Bearing in mind the biological activity of water extracts of xylem and stump bark and their potential application in pharmacy and biomedicine, the content of macro- and microelements in the extracts was examined for the assessment of elemental composition and safety profile. Results of the elemental analysis of the water extracts of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps performed by ICP-OES as well as the permitted concentration limits (PCL) for the purpose of safety assessment are represented in Table 4.
The concentration of macroelements is higher in bark water extracts, except for S (Table 4), which is slightly higher in the xylem water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps, which is consistent with the higher ash content found in the bark [66] (Figure 3). Among the microelements, only Si and Cu exhibit higher concentrations in xylem water extracts (Table 4). The macro- and micro-element composition of water extracts corresponds to elements typically found in wood, according to available research. About 80% of wood’s inorganic substances consist of Ca, K, and Mg, which are found in wood in the form of salts (carbonates, oxalates and, sulfates) or are bound to carboxyl groups of pectic materials and other components of the cell wall, while Na is somewhat less abundant [103]. The rest of the inorganic components of wood are mostly Fe, Cu, Zn, Ba, B, and Cr, and other elements may also be present [103] The content of inorganic components varies greatly depending on the species and part of the tree, as well as the environmental conditions under which the tree grew [103] Bark contains more mineral substances than xylem, and Ca and K are dominant [66].
In both types of water extracts, K has the highest concentration among macroelements, while Si is the most abundant among the detected elements present in lower concentrations. Although Ca is the most abundant inorganic element in wood, it is found in tissue primarily in the insoluble forms—calcium oxalate and pectate [104,105]. This could be related to the relatively low concentration of Ca in the water extracts of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps compared to minerals that are less abundant in wood but more soluble, such as K. Among the macroelements, Na shows the lowest concentration in both extracts. According to the ICH Q3D guideline, Permitted Daily Exposures (PDEs) have not been established for the most abundant elements found in the water extracts of the analyzed stumps (K, Ca, Mg, and Na) due to their low inherent toxicity [64]. Within this group of elements, Zn and Fe were present in smaller quantities, with Fe showing the lowest concentrations among microelements in both types of water extracts. B is not detected in xylem water extracts, but it is present in bark extract, while Si, P, and S were found in both types of extracts. The remaining analyzed elements from the group without established PDEs (Mn, W, Bi, In, Sr, Ti, Ce, Ta, Nb, and Ge) were not detected in the analyzed xylem and bark extracts of the narrow-leaved ash. Highly toxic elements (Class 1), such as As, Cd, Pb, and Hg, were below the limit of detection (LOD) in the analyzed water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps (Table 4). The instrumental LODs of the ICP-OES method used in this study for these elements were well below the regulatory thresholds for both oral and cutaneous Permitted Concentration Limits (PCLs). This analytically confirms that the analyzed extracts satisfy the strictest pharmaceutical purity criteria regarding the presence of heavy metals. Ni, Co, and V, which are considered potentially toxic elements at elevated concentrations and require a risk assessment (Class 2A according to ICH Q3D), were also below the limit of detection, with LOD values safely below the PCLs for both oral and cutaneous exposure routes (Table 4). Among the elements with low natural abundance (Class 2B), only Ag and Tl were analyzed. These elements were not detected in the water extracts from the xylem and bark of the narrow-leaved ash stumps from “Morović”, with their LODs remaining below the oral and dermal PCLs. Furthermore, the concentrations of relatively low-toxicity elements with high PDE limits (Class 3), such as Ba, Cr, Cu, Mo, and Sb, were far below the PCLs for both oral and cutaneous routes (Table 4). A similar trend was observed for the LODs of the remaining elements from this group (Sn and Li), which were not detected by the ICP-OES analysis. Finally, it should be mentioned that previous studies have shown that certain metals dissolved from wood, such as Zn, Cu [106,107,108,109], Fe [108,109,110], Mg, Ca [109], Na [107], Cr [108], and others, can bind with flavonoids and other polyphenols by chelation and other mechanisms, forming stable complexes. In this way, these metals may potentially influence the antioxidant potential of polyphenols. However, these interactions were not investigated in the current study and would require extensive additional analyses.

4. Conclusions

Based on the analyses of the chemical composition and bioactive compounds, it was determined that the stumps of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon at the Forest Administration “Morović” site represent a valuable and, so far, underutilized source of biomass, with the potential for further valorization. The xylem of stumps shows a chemical composition similar to that of stemwood, particularly in cellulose and lignin content, suggesting its potential for use in industries that rely on lignocellulosic raw materials. At the same time, water extracts of bark are characterized by a high content of total phenolic compounds and pronounced antioxidant activity, with the absence of toxic metals, which makes them a suitable raw material for further research in terms of potential use in bio-based industries. Based on the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS analysis, it can be concluded that the biomass of analyzed narrow-leaved ash stumps from “Morović” is rich in different classes of secondary metabolites, dominated by phenylethanoid glycosides and secoiridoids, with the presence of lignans and phenolic acids. Comparison of the samples suggested that the bark sample is chemically more diverse, especially in terms of exhibiting a broader diversity of tentatively identified iridoid and phenolic constituent profiles, indicating its greater potential for further valorization, while the xylem also contains key bioactive compounds, but with somewhat lower diversity. The obtained results show that stumps of F. angustifolia from the “Morović” Forest Administration site, considering their chemical composition, have potential for further investigation regarding cellulose and lignin content, as well as bioactive components. To confirm this, it would be necessary, for further investigation, to examine a larger number of stumps from the same site individually.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/analytica7030056/s1, Figure S1, Representative UHPLC chromatograms of the xylem: (-) and (+) ESI-MS detection by the base ion peak in the mass range m/z 100–1000; Figure S2, Representative UHPLC-DAD chromatograms of the xylem: detection at reference wavelength 280 nm and 300 nm; Figure S3, Representative UHPLC chromatograms of the bark: (-) and (+) ESI-MS detection by the base ion peak in the mass range m/z 100–1000; Figure S4, Representative UHPLC-DAD chromatograms of the bark: detection at reference wavelength 280 nm and 300 nm; Table S1: Operating conditions of the instrument; Table S2: Parameters of the calibration curve for the measured elements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P. and I.L.; methodology, J.P. and I.L.; software, G.P., S.P., and J.Z.; validation, J.P., S.P., J.Z., I.L. and M.K.R.; formal analysis, G.P., S.P., J.Z., M.V., Đ.I. and I.L.; investigation, G.P., M.V., Đ.I. and I.L.; resources, J.P., S.P., J.Z., M.K.R. and I.L.; data curation, G.P., S.P., J.Z. and I.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.P., G.P. and I.L.; writing—review and editing, J.P., S.P., J.Z., M.K.R. and I.L.; visualization, G.P., S.P., J.Z. and I.L.; supervision, J.P.; project administration, J.P. and I.L.; funding acquisition, J.P., I.L. and M.K.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, contract numbers: 451-03-34/2026-03/200169; 451-03-33/2026-03/200168; 451-03-33/2026-03/200288; 451-03-34/2026-03/200133.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Material. The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article and Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Đ.I. is employed by the Innovative Centre of the Faculty of Chemistry Ltd. This institution is a university-affiliated research center, and its legal status does not influence the objectivity, design, execution, or interpretation of the research presented in this study. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CIDCollision-induced dissociation
DWDry weight
DADDiode array detector
DPPH2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazy
GAEGallic acid equivalent
HPTLCHigh-performance thin-layer chromatography
ICH Q3DInternational Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Elemental Impurities
ICP-OESInductively coupled plasma—optical emission spectrometry
LODsLimits of detection
LRLinearity ranges
NDNot detected (below the limit of detection)
PDEPermitted daily exposure
PCLPermitted concentration limit
RCorrelation coefficient
TETrolox equivalent
TPCTotal phenolic content
UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MSUltra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
UV-VisUltraviolet-visible

References

  1. Bergström, D.; Matisons, M. Forest Refine, 2012–2014—Efficient Forest Biomass Supply Chain Management for Biorefineries; Department of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Umeå, Sweden, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. García-Pérez, M.E.; Kasangana, P.B.; Stevanovic, T. Bioactive Molecules from Myrianthus Arboreus, Acer Rubrum, and Picea Mariana Forest Resources. Molecules 2023, 28, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Walmsley, J.D.; Godbold, D.L. Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy—A Review of the Environmental Impacts. Forestry 2010, 83, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Vangeel, T.; Neiva, D.M.; Quilhó, T.; Costa, R.A.; Sousa, V.; Sels, B.F.; Pereira, H. Tree Bark Characterization Envisioning an Integrated Use in a Biorefinery. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 2029–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Fengel, D.; Wegner, G. Wood, Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  6. Luís, Â.; Neiva, D.; Pereira, H.; Gominho, J.; Domingues, F.; Duarte, A. Stumps of Eucalyptus Globulus as a Source of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Polyphenols. Molecules 2014, 19, 16428–16446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Gominho, J.; Lourenço, A.; Miranda, I.; Pereira, H. Chemical and Fuel Properties of Stumps Biomass from Eucalyptus Globulus Plantations. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 39, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Halmemies, E.S.; Brännström, H.E.; Karjalainen, M.; Nurmi, J.; Alén, R. Availability of Extractives from Various Norway Spruce (Picea Abies) Stumps Assortments. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2023, 43, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Moffat, A.; Nisbet, T.; Nicoll, B. Environmental Effects of Stump and Root Harvesting. Available online: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/publications/environmental-effects-of-stump-and-root-harvesting/ (accessed on 16 March 2025).
  10. Persson, T.; Egnelly, G.; Lithell, C. Stump Harvesting, Impact on Climate and Environment; Persson, T., Egnell, G., Lithell, C., Eds.; IEA Bioenergy: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Trezza, A.; Mahboob, L.; Visibelli, A.; Geminiani, M. Lignin Waste Valorization in the Bioeconomy Era: Toward Sustainable Innovation and Climate Resilience. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Zuin, V.G.; Ramin, L.Z. Green and Sustainable Separation of Natural Products from Agro-Industrial Waste: Challenges, Potentialities, and Perspectives on Emerging Approaches. Top. Curr. Chem. 2018, 376, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Niu, X.; He, Y.; Musl, O.; Bautista, G.F.M.; Xie, Q.; Wu, Y.; Guo, J.; Rojas, O.J. Bark Extractives as Sources of Carbon-Efficient Functional Precursors and Materials. Innov. Mater. 2024, 2, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Persson, T. Environmental Consequences of Tree-Stump Harvesting. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 290, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Vanguelova, E.I.; Pitman, R.; Benham, S.; Perks, M.; Morison, J.I.L. Impact of Tree Stump Harvesting on Soil Carbon and Nutrients and Second Rotation Tree Growth in Mid-Wales, UK. Open J. For. 2017, 7, 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Damyanova, S.; Dimitrova, V. Chemical Composition and Stocks of Nutrients in Dead Wood of Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Forests. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 2023, 19, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Nurmi, J. Heating Values of Mature Trees, 1st ed.; Acta Forestalia Fennica 256: Tampere, Finland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  18. Latva-Mäenpää, H. Bioactive and Protective Polyphenolics from Roots and Stumps of Conifer Trees (Norway Spruce and Scots Pine). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Routa, J.; Brannstrom, H.; Anttila, P.; Makinen, M.; Janis, J.; Asikainen, A. Wood Extractives of Finnish Pine, Spruce and Birch—Availability and Optimal Sources of Compounds: A Literature Review; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke): Helsinki, Finland, 2017.
  20. Sisojević, D. Anatomija Drveta, 2nd ed.; Šumarski Fakultet-OOUR Institut za Preradu Drveta: Beograd, Serbia, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tahirović, A.; Bašić, N. Determination of Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Leaves and Bark Extracts. Work. Fac. For. Univ. Sarajev. 2016, 46, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Caudullo, G.; Durrant, T.H. Fraxinus angustifolia in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage and Threats. In European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; p. 97. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cicek, E.; Yilmaz, M. The Importance of Fraxinus angustifolia Subsp. Oxycarpa as a Fast Growing Tree for Turkey. In Proceedings of the IUFRO Meeting: Management of Fast Growing Plantations, Div. 4.04.06, İzmit, Turkey, 11–13 September 2002; pp. 192–200. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao, Y.; He, W.; Yang, Y.; Liu, R.; Wang, X.; Bai, J. Phytochemical Constituents and Pharmacological Properties of Fraxinus spp.: A Review. Chem. Biodivers. 2025, 22, e202402879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Joseleau, J.P.; Messaoudi, D.; Ruel, K.; Conseil, L. How the Biochemical Activities of Polyphenols May Be Effective for the Protection of Wood Deterioration by Termites? In Proceedings of the Proceeding of IRG54 Scientific Conference on Wood Protection, Cairns, Australia, 28 May–1 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hidalgo, J.; Hidalgo, L.; Serrano, C.; Punina, D.; Rea, E.; Ilbay, M.; Vilaso-Cadre, J.E.; Reyes-Dominguez, I.A. A Study of the Inhibition Capacity of a Novel Ilex guayusa Green Extract for Preventing Corrosion in Mild Steel Exposed to Different Conditions. Analytica 2025, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Hidalgo, J.; Hidalgo, L.; Serrano Aguiar, C.D.; Garcia Madronero, D.B.; Galambos, I.; Vilaso-Cadre, J.E.; Reyes-Domingues, I.A.; Branzanic, A.M.V.; Ignat, N.; Turdean, G.L. Study of Caesalpinia spinosa Extracts As Green Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel. Langmur 2025, 41, 9406–9421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Nykolov, N.; Iossifova, T.; Vassileva, E.; Kostova, I.; Stoev, G. Reverse-Phase High Pressure Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of Hydroxycoumarins in Plant Extracts. Quantitative Determination of Hydroxycoumarins in Fraxinus ornus. Phytochem. Anal. 1993, 4, 86–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Iossifova, T.; Vogler, B.; Klaiber, I.; Kostova, I.; Kraus, W. Caffeic Acid Esters of Phenylethanoid Glycosides from Fraxinus Ornus Bark. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Chang, H.C.; Wang, S.W.; Chen, C.Y.; Hwang, T.L.; Cheng, M.J.; Sung, P.J.; Liao, K.W.; Chen, J.J. Secoiridoid Glucosides and Anti-Inflammatory Constituents from the Stem Bark of Fraxinus chinensis. Molecules 2020, 25, 5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Jensen, S.R.; Nielsen, B.J. A New Coumarin, Fraxidin 8-O-β-D-Glucoside and 10-Hydroxyligstroside from Bark of Fraxinus exelsior. Phytochemistry 1976, 15, 221–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Si, C.L.; Liu, Z.; Su, Y.F.; Kim, J.K.; Bae, Y.S. Coumarins and Secoiridoid Glucosides from Bark of Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance. Holzforschung 2008, 62, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Shen, Y.C.; Chen, C.H.; Lee, K.-H. Secoiridoid Dilactones from Fraxinus uhdei. Phytochemistry 1993, 33, 1531–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Kiss, A.K.; Michalak, B.; Patyra, A.; Majdan, M. UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS and HPTLC Profiling of Ash Leaf Samples from Different Commercial and Natural Sources and Their in Vitro Effects on Mediators of Inflammation. Phytochem. Anal. 2020, 31, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Kasmi, S.; Hamdi, A.; Atmani-Kilani, D.; Debbache-Benaida, N.; Jaramillo-Carmona, S.; Rodríguez-Arcos, R.; Jiménez-Araujo, A.; Ayouni, K.; Atmani, D.; Guillén-Bejarano, R. Characterization of Phenolic Compounds Isolated from the Fraxinus angustifolia Plant and Several Associated Bioactivities. J. Herb. Med. 2021, 29, 100485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Kostova, I.; Iossifova, T. Chemical Components of Fraxinus Species. Fitoterapia 2007, 78, 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Atmani, D.; Chaher, N.; Berboucha, M.; Ayouni, K.; Lounis, H.; Boudaoud, H.; Debbache, N.; Atmani, D. Antioxidant Capacity and Phenol Content of Selected Algerian Medicinal Plants. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Bouguellid, G.; Russo, C.; Lavorgna, M.; Piscitelli, C.; Ayouni, K.; Wilson, E.; Kim, H.K.; Verpoorte, R.; Choi, Y.H.; Kilani-Atmani, D.; et al. Antimutagenic, Antigenotoxic and Antiproliferative Activities of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Leaves and Stem Bark Extracts and Their Phytochemical Composition. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Ahmane, N.; Atmani-Kilani, D.; Chaher, N.; Ayouni, K.; Rahmani-Berboucha, M.; Da Costa, G.; Debbache-Benaida, N.; Richard, T.; Atmani, D. Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Fraxinus angustifolia Extracts with Anti-NADH Oxidase Activity of Bovine Milk Xanthine Oxidoreductase. Turk. J. Biol. 2019, 43, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. José-Vicente, O.V.; Enrique, G.A. Analysis of Durability and Dimensional Stability of Hydrothermal Carbonized Wooden Pellets. Wood Res. 2016, 61, 321–330. [Google Scholar]
  41. Popović, J.J.; Popović, M.M.; Điporović-Momčilović, M.R.; Prahin, A.M.; Dodevski, V.M.; Gavrilović-Grmuša, I.M. Effects of Water Pretreatment on Properties of Pellets Made from Beech Particles. Hem. Ind. 2021, 75, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Pelaez-Samaniego, M.R.; Yadama, V.; Lowell, E.; Amidon, T.E.; Chaffee, T.L. Hot Water Extracted Wood Fiber for Production of Wood Plastic Composites (WPCs). Holzforschung 2013, 67, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Ozdemir, F.; Ayrilmis, N.; Kaymakci, A.; Kwon, J.H. Improving Dimensional Stability of Injection Molded Wood Plastic Composites Using Cold and Hot Water Extraction Methods. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2014, 16, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Pelaez-Samaniego, M.R.; Yadama, V.; Garcia-Perez, T.; Lowell, E.; Amidon, T. Effect of Hot Water Extracted Hardwood and Softwood Chips on Particleboard Properties. Holzforschung 2014, 68, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Mohebby, B.; Ilbeighi, F.; Kazemi-Najafi, S. Influence of Hydrothermal Modification of Fibers on Some Physical and Mechanical Properties of Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF). Holz Roh Werkst. 2008, 66, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Paredes, J.J.; Jara, R.; Shaler, S.M.; van Heiningen, A. Influence of Hot Water Extraction on the Physical and Mechanical Behavior of OSB. For. Prod. J. 2008, 58, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  47. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). FSC Public Certificate Search. Available online: https://fsc.org/en (accessed on 31 July 2026).
  48. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 257 cm-02: Sampling and Preparing Wood for Analysis; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  49. ISO 14780:2017; Solid Biofuels—Sample Preparation. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  50. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 264 cm-97: Preparation of Wood for Chemical Analysis; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  51. Browning, B.L. Methods of Wood Chemistry, Vol. 2; Interscience Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  52. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 222 om-02 Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  53. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T UM 250: Acid-Soluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  54. ASTM D1107-96; Standard Test Method for Ethanol-Toluene Solubility of Wood. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
  55. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 207 cm-99: Water Solubility of Wood and Pulp; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  56. ASTM D1110-21; Standard Test Methods for Water Solubility of Wood. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  57. TAPPI-Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. TAPPI T 413 om-93: Ash in Wood, Pulp, Paper and Paperboard: Combustion at 900 °C; TAPPI Press: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  58. Aksić, M.; Dekić, B.; Janićević, S. Determination of Polyphenol and Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Activity of Ethanolic, Chloroform and Ethyl Acetate Extract of the Plant Species Thymus serpyllum L. Bull. Nat. Sci. Res. 2023, 13, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Smailagić, A.; Veljović, S.; Gašić, U.; Zagorac, D.D.; Stanković, M.; Radotić, K.; Natić, M. Phenolic Profile, Chromatic Parameters and Fluorescence of Different Woods Used in Balkan Cooperage. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 132, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Sonia, K.; Shree, B.S.; Lakshmi, K.S. HPTLC Method Development and Validation. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 9, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Long, H.; Yao, S.; Tian, W.; Hou, J.; Lei, M.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, D.; Wu, W. A Simple and Effective Method for Identification of Fraxini Cortex from Different Sources by Multi-Mode Fingerprint Combined with Chemometrics. J. Sep. Sci. 2022, 45, 788–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, J.; Yue, Y.D.; Tang, F.; Sun, J. TLC Screening for Antioxidant Activity of Extracts from Fifteen Bamboo Species and Identification of Antioxidant Flavone Glycosides from Leaves of Bambusa. textilis McClure. Molecules 2012, 17, 12297–12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Sjöström, E. Wood Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  64. International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). Guideline for Elemental Impurities Q3D (R2). Available online: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/Q3D-R2_Guideline_Step4_2022_0308.pdf (accessed on 2 August 2026).
  65. Rowell, R.M. Cell Wall Chemistry, 2nd ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pásztory, Z.; Mohácsiné, I.R.; Gorbacheva, G.; Börcsök, Z. The Utilization of Tree Bark. BioResources 2016, 11, 7859–7888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Zobel, B.J.; van Buijtenen, J.P. Wood Variation. Its Causes and Control; Timell, T.E., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  68. Plomion, C.; Leprovost, G.; Stokes, A. Wood Formation in Trees. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Popović, J.; Klašnja, B.; Popović, M.; Điporović-Momčilović, M.; Gavrilović-Grmuša, I. Variability in Chemical Composition of Narrow-Leaved Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Ssp. Pannonica Soó & Simon) in Regard to Its Age and Possition inside the Tree. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Wood Science and Technology 2016 Implementation of Wood Science in Woodworking Sector; University of Zagreb—Faculty of Forestry: Zagreb, Croatia, 2016; pp. 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yalcin, M.; Sahin, H.I. Changes in the Chemical Structure and Decay Resistance of Heat-Treated Narrow-Leaved Ash Wood. Maderas. Cienc. Technol. 2015, 17, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Donaldson, L.; Nanayakkara, B.; Harrington, J. Plant Cells: Wood Growth and Development. Encycl. Appl. Plant Sci. 2017, 1, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Bodîrlau, R.; Spiridon, I.; Teaca, C.A. Chemical Investigation of Wood Tree Species in Temperate Forest in East-Northern Romania. BioResources 2007, 2, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Rowell, R.M. The Chemistry of Solid Wood; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  74. Mazri, S.; Benotmane, B.; Hachemi, M.; Pranovich, A.; Willför, S.; Smeds, A. Chemical Characterization of Sapwood and Heartwood of Fraxinus angustifolia Growing in Algeria. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2022, 42, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Pettersen, R.C. The Chemical Composition of Wood. In The Chemistry of Solid Wood; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1984; pp. 57–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Ihnat, V.; Fišerova, M.; Opalena, E.; Russ, A.; Bohaček, Š. Chemical Composition and Fibre Characteristics of Branch Wood of Selected Hardwood Species. Acta Fac. Xylologiae Zvolen 2021, 63, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Elmas, G.M. Comparison of Various Pulping Characteristic of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Wood. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 9812–9816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Dou, J.; Bian, H.; Yelle, D.J.; Ago, M.; Vajanto, K.; Vuorinen, T.; Zhu, J. Lignin Containing Cellulose Nanofibril Production from Willow Bark at 80 °C Using a Highly Recyclable Acid Hydrotrope. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Dedrie, M.; Jacquet, N.; Bombeck, P.L.; Hébert, J.; Richel, A. Oak Barks as Raw Materials for the Extraction of Polyphenols for the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sectors: A Regional Case Study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 70, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Bekhta, P.; Sedliačik, J.; Noshchenko, G.; Kačík, F.; Bekhta, N. Characteristics of Beech Bark and Its Effect on Properties of UF Adhesive and on Bonding Strength and Formaldehyde Emission of Plywood Panels. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2021, 79, 423–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Hamad, A.M.A.; Ates, S.; Olgun, Ç.; Gür, M. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Some Industrial Tree Bark Extracts. BioResources 2023, 14, 5657–5671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Safdari, V.; Khodadadi, H.; Hosseinihashemi, S.K.; Ganjian, E. The Effects of Poplar Bark and Wood Content on the Mechanical Properties of Wood-Polypropylene. BioResources 2011, 6, 5180–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Akgül, M.; Gücüş, O.; Demİr, S.; Üner, B. Melez Kavak (Populus Euramericana (I-214)) Odunu ve Kabuğunun Kimyasal Bileşimi. Orman. Derg. 2013, 9, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Dibdiakova, J.; Gjølsjø, S.; Wang, L. Solid Biofuels from Forest—Fuel Specification and Quality Inherent Properties of Norway Spruce Biomass in Some Geographical Locations in South Norway; Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute: As, Norway, 2014.
  85. Nosek, R.; Holubcik, M.; Jandacka, J. The Impact of Bark Content of Wood Biomass on Biofuel Properties. BioResources 2016, 11, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Stevanović-Janežić, T. Hemija Drveta Sa Hemijskom Preradom. Prvi Deo: Hemija Drveta, 1st. ed.; Jugoslavijapublik: Beograd, Serbia, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sakai, K. Chemistry of bark. In Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry; Hon, D.N.S., Shiraishi, N., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 243–273. [Google Scholar]
  88. Touhami, I.; Ghazghazi, H.; Sellimi, H.; Khaldi, A.; Mahmoudi, H. Antioxidant Activities and Phenolic Contents of Bark and Leave Extracts from Tunisian Native Tree: Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Subsp. Angustifolia. J. New Sci. 2017, 45, 2496–2501. [Google Scholar]
  89. Brennan, M.; Fritsch, C.; Cosgun, S.; Dumarcay, S.; Colin, F.; Gerardin, P. Quantitative and Qualitative Composition of Bark Polyphenols Changes Longitudinally with Bark Maturity in Abies alba Mill. Ann. For. Sci. 2020, 77, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Azib, L.; Debbache-Benaida, N.; Da Costa, G.; Atmani-Kilani, D.; Saidene, N.; Bouguellid, G.; Ourabah, A.; Krisa, S.; Richard, T.; Atmani, D. Neuroprotective Effects of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Bark Extract against Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2020, 109, 101848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Withouck, H.; Paelinck, A.; Foubert, I.; Fraeye, I. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Applewood Polyphenols at Lab and Pilot Scales. Foods 2023, 12, 3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  92. Lazar, L.; Iulia, A.; Volf, I.; Popa, V.I. Kinetic Modeling of the Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Picea Abies Bark. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 32, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Meneses, N.G.T.; Martins, S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Mussatto, S.I. Influence of Extraction Solvents on the Recovery of Antioxidant Phenolic Compounds from Brewer’s Spent Grains. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 108, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Baron, G.; Ferrario, G.; Marinello, C.; Carini, M.; Morazzoni, P.; Aldini, G. Effect of Extraction Solvent and Temperature on Polyphenol Profiles, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Red Grape Skin by-Product. Molecules 2021, 26, 5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  95. Sarfraz, I.; Rasul, A.; Jabeen, F.; Younis, T.; Zahoor, M.K.; Arshad, M.; Ali, M. Fraxinus: A Plant with Versatile Pharmacological and Biological Activities. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 4269868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Ivković, Đ.; Andrić, F.; Senćanski, M.; Stević, T.; Krstić Ristivojević, M.; Ristivojević, P. Innovative Analytical Methodology for Skin Anti-Aging Compounds Discovery from Plant Extracts: Integration of High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography-in Vitro Spectrophotometry Bioassays with Multivariate Modeling and Molecular Docking. J. Chromatogr. A 2025, 1742, 465640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Zürn, M.; Tóth, G.; Ausbüttel, T.; Mucsi, Z.; Horváti, K.; Bősze, S.; Sütöri-Diószegi, M.; Pályi, B.; Kis, Z.; Noszál, B.; et al. Tissue-Specific Accumulation and Isomerization of Valuable Phenylethanoid Glycosides from Plantago and Forsythia Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  98. Liu, T.; Lin, S. Comprehensive Characterization of the Chemical Constituents of Lianhua Qingwen Capsule by Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. Heliyon 2024, 10, e27352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  99. Torres-Vega, J.; Gómez-Alonso, S.; Pérez-Navarro, J.; Alarcón-Enos, J.; Pastene-Navarrete, E. Polyphenolic Compounds Extracted and Purified from Buddleja Globosa Hope (Buddlejaceae) Leaves Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Centrifugal Partition Chromatography. Molecules 2021, 26, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  100. Passon, M.; Weber, F.; Jung, N.U.; Bartels, D. Profiling of Phenolic Compounds in Desiccation-Tolerant and Non-Desiccation-Tolerant Linderniaceae. Phytochem. Anal. 2021, 32, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Llorent-Martínez, E.J.; Gouveia, S.; Castilho, P.C. Analysis of Phenolic Compounds in Leaves from Endemic Trees from Madeira Island. A Contribution to the Chemotaxonomy of Laurisilva Forest Species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 64, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Ado, M.A.; Abas, F.; Leong, S.W.; Shaari, K.; Ismail, I.S.; Ghazali, H.M.; Lajis, N.H. Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Callicarpa Maingayi Leaves. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 104, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Saka, S. Chemical Composition and Distribution. In Wood and Cellulosic Chemistry; Hon, D.N.S., Shiraishi, N., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 51–81. [Google Scholar]
  104. Vegunta, V.; Senthilkumar, E.R.; Lindén, P.; Sevastyanova, O.; Vilaplana, F.; Garcia, A.; Björk, M.; Jansson, U.; Henriksson, G.; Lindström, M.E. High Calcium Content of Eucalyptus Dunnii Wood Affects Delignification and Polysaccharide Degradation in Kraft Pulping. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 2022, 37, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Mellerowicz, E.J.; Baucher, M.; Sundberg, B.; Boerjan, W. Unravelling Cell Wall Formation in the Woody Dicot Stem. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 47, 239–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Bratu, M.M.; Birghila, S.; Miresan, H.; Negreanu-Pirol, T.; Prajitura, C.; Calinescu, M. Biological Activities of Zn(II) and Cu(II) Complexes with Quercetin and Rutin: Antioxidant Properties and UV-Protection Capacity. Rev. Chim. 2014, 65, 544–549. [Google Scholar]
  107. Khater, M.; Ravishankar, D.; Greco, F.; Osborn, H.M.I. Metal Complexes of Flavonoids: Their Synthesis, Characterization and Enhanced Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities. Future Med. Chem. 2019, 11, 2845–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  108. Rodríguez-Arce, E.; Saldías, M. Antioxidant Properties of Flavonoid Metal Complexes and Their Potential Inclusion in the Development of Novel Strategies for the Treatment against Neurodegenerative Diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 143, 112236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  109. Rak, K.; Kolniak-Ostek, J.; Gajda, R.; Marcinkiewicz, K.; Nemś, A.; Raczkowska, E. Antioxidant Activity, Total Polyphenol Content, and Mineral Composition of Milk Beverages Fortified with Spice Mixtures (Clove, Cinnamon, and Turmeric) and Natural Sweeteners (Erythritol and Stevia): Evidence of Synergistic or Antagonistic Effects of Comp. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  110. Kejík, Z.; Kaplánek, R.; Masařík, M.; Babula, P.; Matkowski, A.; Filipenský, P.; Veselá, K.; Gburek, J.; Sýkora, D.; Martásek, P.; et al. Iron Complexes of Flavonoids-Antioxidant Capacity and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of narrow-leaved ash stump preparation for chemical analysis. The arrows indicate the sequence of the preparation steps.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of narrow-leaved ash stump preparation for chemical analysis. The arrows indicate the sequence of the preparation steps.
Analytica 07 00056 g001
Figure 2. Cellulose, hemicelluloses with other components, and lignin content of xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as % DW (mean value ± standard deviation).
Figure 2. Cellulose, hemicelluloses with other components, and lignin content of xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as % DW (mean value ± standard deviation).
Analytica 07 00056 g002
Figure 3. Extractives and ash content of xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as % DW (mean value ± standard deviation).
Figure 3. Extractives and ash content of xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as % DW (mean value ± standard deviation).
Analytica 07 00056 g003
Figure 4. HPTLC-DPPH antioxidant profile of the xylem and bark water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps under visible light.
Figure 4. HPTLC-DPPH antioxidant profile of the xylem and bark water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps under visible light.
Analytica 07 00056 g004
Table 2. TPC and antioxidant capacity of water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as mean value ± standard deviation.
Table 2. TPC and antioxidant capacity of water extracts of narrow-leaved ash stumps, expressed as mean value ± standard deviation.
Narrow-Leaved Ash StumpTPC
mg GAE/g DW
DPPH
μmol TE/g DW
xylem6.26 ± 0.2147.79 ± 3.71
bark33.94 ± 1.43198.48 ± 3.33
Table 3. List of detected compounds by UHPLC-DAD-ESI MS/MS analysis in negative and positive ionization modes of water extracts of xylem and bark of stumps of narrow-leaved ash.
Table 3. List of detected compounds by UHPLC-DAD-ESI MS/MS analysis in negative and positive ionization modes of water extracts of xylem and bark of stumps of narrow-leaved ash.
tr, minλmax,
nm
Molecular Ion Peak
[M-H]
* [M-H + HCOOH]-
** [M + H]+
*** [M + Na]+
**** [M + NH4]+,
m/z
ESI MS/MS Fragment Ions, m/zTentative Annotation (Reference)Sample
XylemBark
0.67-181163 (100%), 131, 119, 101, 89, 71, 59n.i. Derivative of p-coumaric acid++
0.75-* 387* 341 (100%),179Caffeoyl hexose
(PubChem CID:6124135)
++
0.77-133115 (100%),87Mallic acid
(standard)
-+
0.96-191173,111 (100%)Quinic acid
(PubChem CID: 1064)
++
1.15286393375, 363 (100%), 331, 213, 183, 151, 139n.i.++
1.25280* 377* 331 (100%), 169Galloyl hexoside
(PubChem CID:124021)
-+
1.35289
320
* 479
*** 457
**** 452
* 433 (100%), 293
*** 302, 295, 267 (100%), 237, 207
n.i. Flavanone hexoside++
1.53-393375, 363 (100%), 331, 213, 183, 151, 139n.i.++
1.80-*377* 331 (100%), 169Galloyl hexoside
(PubChem CID:124021)
-+
2.38233
281
306
315179, 153, 135 (100%)Hydroxytyrosol hexoside [65] ++
2.62320375357, 331 (100%), 191, 179, 161, 151n.i. Phenolic acid++
3.17279
313
407389, 375/377, 357 (100%), 345, 313n.i.++
3.40279
313
407389, 375/377, 357 (100%), 345, 331, 313n.i.++
3.40-461315 (100%), 297, 281, 161, 135Decaffeoylverbascoside, verbasoside [67]++
3.87–4.00-345299 (100%), 179n.i.++
4.86 * 387* 341 (100%), 179Caffeic acid hexoside
(PubChem CID: 6124135)
-+
5.35270431413, 299 (100%)/300, 251, 191, 179, 161, 149, 131pentoside++
5.53266611565 (100%), 403n.i.++
5.73266611565 (100%), 403n.i.++
5.83342369207 (100%), 192n.i.++
6.16329429383, 369, 221 (100%), 206, 191, 177, 163n.i.++
6.34361583537 (100%), 375n.i.++
6.86269
300
477431, 341, 315, 179, 161 (100%), 135Hydroxytyrosol dihexoside
(PubChem CID: 177827552)
++
7.01329
300 sh
639621 (100%), 529, 459β-hydroxyverbascoside [66] ++
7.28328
300 sh
581
565
535, 337 (100%), 193, 175
519 (100%), 501
n.i. Coumaroylquinic acid derivative++
7.28341525481, 363 (100%), 345, 301, 283, 207, 181Demethyloleuropein [68]-+
7.51327
300
787741 (100%), 579n.i.++
7.75324
300 sh
639621 (100%), 529, 459β-hydroxyisoverbascoside [66]++
8.00281477431, 341, 315, 179, 161 (100%), 135Hydroxytyrosol dihexoside
(PubChem CID: 177827552)
++
8.36333
300 sh
623
** 625
*** 647
**** 642
461 (100%), 315
** -
*** -
**** 625 (100%), 479, 471, 325, 309
Phenylethanoid glycoside isomer (forsythoside/acetoside-related compound) [63,65]++
8.56281477431, 341, 315, 181, 161 (100%), 135Hydroxytyrosol dihexoside
(PubChem CID: 177827552)
++
8.58333
300 sh
623461 (100%), 315Phenylethanoid glycoside isomer (verbascoside-related compound) [63,65]++
9.05330
290 sh
623
461 (100%), 315Phenylethanoid glycoside isomer (verbascoside-related compound) [63,65]++
9.29198
224
242
731685 (100%), 523, 345Oleoside/secologanoside derivative [68]++
9.54314
300
539377 (100%), 359, 291, 275Secoiridoid glycoside isomer (oleuropein-related compound) [68]-+
10.00202
231
280
539
** 541
377, 345, 327, 307 (100%), 275
** 511, 331 (100%), 286, 233
Secoiridoid glycoside isomer (oleuropein-related compound) [68]++
10.21283
335
637619, 491, 475, 461 (100%), 443, 297, 235, 193Eukovoside [69]++
10.80228
240 sh
523
** 525
*** 547
361 (100%), 291, 259
** -
*** 385 (100%), 369/367, 353, 311, 233
Secoiridoid glycoside (ligstroside-related compound) [68]++
11.23-895
* 569
523
793, 663, 509 (100%), 347
* 523 (100%)
403, 385, 361 (100%), 291, 347
Lignan hexoside derivative (secoisolariciresinol-related compound) [65]++
11.76-* 569
523
* 523 (100%)
453, 385, 361 (100%), 291, 259
Lignan hexoside derivative (secoisolariciresinol-related compound) [65]++
12.14–12.20240* 955
909
** 929
935, 909 (100%)
-
** 731/732, 551 (100%)/552, 519, 477
n.i.++
tr—retention time, detected from ESI-MS signal. λmax—absorption maximum wavelength in the UV–Vis spectrum, from DAD signal. The most intense fragment ions in the ESI MS/MS spectrum are marked as 100%. The second-most intense ions in the ESI MS/MS spectrum are the underlined fragment ion(s). PubChem CID—database at https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 6 August 2026). n.i.—not identified.
Table 4. Macro- and microelement composition of water extracts from xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, with PCLs based on ICH Q3D guidelines for oral and cutaneous routes.
Table 4. Macro- and microelement composition of water extracts from xylem and bark of narrow-leaved ash stumps, with PCLs based on ICH Q3D guidelines for oral and cutaneous routes.
Concentrations of Macro- and Microelements and PCLs (μg/mL)
AsAgBBaBiCaCdCoCrCuFeInKLiMgMnNa
xylemNDNDND0.04ND11.12NDND0.050.220.01ND44.43ND2.55ND1.00
barkNDND0.180.12ND26.00NDND0.070.140.02ND92.63ND6.73ND1.10
PCL oral 1.515 -140 - -0.551100300 - - - 55 - - -
PCL
cutaneous
315 -700 - -251100300 - - - 250 - - -
NiPbSrTilZnHgSiPSCeSnTaTiVWNbGe
xylemNDNDNDND0.20ND0.993.7213.27NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
barkNDNDNDND0.29ND0.907.5612.97NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
PCL oral 200.5 -0.8 -3.00 - - - - 600 --10 - - -
PCL
cutaneous
205 - - -3.00 - - - - 600-- -0.810 -
ND—not detected (below the limit of detection). PCL—permitted concentration limits.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popović, J.; Petković, G.; Petrović, S.; Zvezdanović, J.; Vranić, M.; Krstić Ristivojević, M.; Ivković, Đ.; Lavadinović, I. Chemical Characterization of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon Stump-Derived Biomass: Evaluation of Valorization Potential. Analytica 2026, 7, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica7030056

AMA Style

Popović J, Petković G, Petrović S, Zvezdanović J, Vranić M, Krstić Ristivojević M, Ivković Đ, Lavadinović I. Chemical Characterization of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon Stump-Derived Biomass: Evaluation of Valorization Potential. Analytica. 2026; 7(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica7030056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popović, Jasmina, Gordana Petković, Sanja Petrović, Jelena Zvezdanović, Milica Vranić, Maja Krstić Ristivojević, Đurđa Ivković, and Ivana Lavadinović. 2026. "Chemical Characterization of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon Stump-Derived Biomass: Evaluation of Valorization Potential" Analytica 7, no. 3: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica7030056

APA Style

Popović, J., Petković, G., Petrović, S., Zvezdanović, J., Vranić, M., Krstić Ristivojević, M., Ivković, Đ., & Lavadinović, I. (2026). Chemical Characterization of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. ssp. pannonica Soó & Simon Stump-Derived Biomass: Evaluation of Valorization Potential. Analytica, 7(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica7030056

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop