Next Article in Journal
The Peculiarities of the German Uranium Project (1939–1945)
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Candidates for a Validation Data Set for High-Assay Low-Enrichment Uranium Fuels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Feasibility Study on Production of High-Purity Rhenium-185 by Nuclear Transmutation of Natural Tantalum

1
Independent Researcher, Oma, Oma-machi, Shimokita-gun, Aomori 039-4601, Japan
2
TWY LLC, 2-36-8, Asahigaoka, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi 981-0904, Japan
3
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama Campus, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Nucl. Eng. 2023, 4(3), 625-633; https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030039
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 10 August 2023 / Accepted: 14 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023

Abstract

:
Rhenium-186 (Re-186) has attracted attention as a medical isotope. The feasibility of producing Re-185, the raw material for Re-186, using a fast reactor was evaluated using a continuous energy Monte Carlo code. The irradiation of natural tantalum (Ta) in the fast reactor can produce Re-185 with an isotopic purity of 99%. A two-step irradiation process with different moderators was found to improve the production rate of Re-185. Specifically, this can be achieved by using zirconium hydride (ZrH1.7) as a moderator in the first transmutation process from natural Ta to tungsten (W), and then zirconium deuteride (ZrD1.7) as a moderator in the second transmutation process from W to Re-185. Due to the two-step irradiation, the production rate of Re-185 from Ta can be increased up to a maximum of 470 times compared with irradiation without a moderator, and 2.3 g of Re-185 can be obtained from 1571 g of Ta in 1 year of irradiation. The proposed isotope production method is a new method that is different from the conventional electromagnetic enrichment process.

1. Introduction

Rhenium (Re) has excellent resistance to high temperatures; therefore, it is used in a variety of applications, as evidenced by the fact that it is used to make turbine blades for jet aircraft engines. On the other hand, Re is one of the least abundant elements in the Earth’s crust, and it is not evenly distributed around the globe [1]. This means that it has a very high supply risk [2].
Re has attracted attention as a radioisotope for medical applications. Re-186 emits β-rays of maximum 1.08 (MeV) and γ-rays of 137 (keV) at 8.6% of decay with a short half-life of 89.3 h. This property allows for simultaneous treatment with β-rays and diagnosis with γ-rays [3,4]. Re-186 can be produced using nuclear reactors or particle accelerators [5]. The (n, γ) reaction of Re-185 in the nuclear reactor is 112 (barn) compared to ~0.6 (barn) for the (d, 2n) reaction of W-186 at ~15 (MeV) in the particle accelerator [6], which means that the production process in the nuclear reactor can produce large amounts of Re-186. On the other hand, the nuclear reactor process produces Re-186 with carriers, resulting in low specific activity [7]. This character is the main disadvantage compared to the particle accelerator process, which can produce carrier-free Re-186. However, this disadvantage may be overcome with techniques to isolate Re-186. Lapi et al. patented a method to isolate Re-186 by vaporizing a compound containing Re-185 and Re-186, ionizing it to form negatively charged molecules, and then using a positively charged collector to separate and recover the molecules by mass difference [8].
The nuclear reactor process requires the preparation of high-purity Re-185 (>94%), but Re-185 has a natural abundance of only 37.4%, as shown in Table 1, and it must be enriched. Electromagnetic isotope separation has long been used for isotope enrichment [9,10], and isotope supply systems have been commercially established. However, due to the limited number of isotope suppliers [11], existing methods for the production of rhenium isotopes may not be able to meet the growing demand for radiotherapeutics in the future [12].
In previous studies, the method of producing Re from tungsten (W) was discussed [13,14,15]. Re can be produced via the transmutation of W with a neutron capture reaction and subsequent β decays using a fast reactor. W is more abundant than Re in the Earth’s crust, and its price is a few tenths of that of Re.
As shown in Figure 1, when natural W is used as the material for transmutation, Re-185 is produced mainly from W-184 with a natural abundance of 30.64%, and Re-187 is produced mainly from W-186 with a natural abundance of 28.43%.
W 184 n ,   γ W 185 R e 185 + β 75 d W 186 n ,   γ W 187 R e 187 + β 24 h
Yokoyama et al. studied a method for producing Re with a higher ratio of Re-185 than the natural one by controlling the transmutation of W isotopes by moderating the energy of neutrons produced in a fast reactor with a moderator [16]. However, Re-185 with an isotopic purity of 65% is not pure enough as a raw material for the production of Re-186. We propose the use of tantalum (Ta) as a new raw material. Figure 2 shows the transmutation path of natural Ta to Re. Ta is similar to W in that it is a more abundant element in the earth than Re. The isotopic purity of Ta-181 in natural Ta is 99.9%. Each isotope of W is produced by the decay of higher-order Ta isotopes via successive neutron capture reactions of Ta-181. Since the half-life of the higher-order Ta isotope is short enough, the produced W will mainly contain W-182 or lower-order isotopes; thus, the amount of W-186 will be extremely small. As a result, the amount of Re-187 transmuted from W-186 in the produced Re is expected to be very small.
Our objective is to investigate the feasibility of a method for producing high-purity Re-185 via the transmutation of natural Ta with a new isotope production process using a fast reactor. In a fast reactor, there are excess neutrons, and it is possible to generate electricity and produce plutonium, etc., at the same time. If this excess of neutrons can be used to produce Re-185, a new isotope production method can be realized. In addition, isotopes can be produced simultaneously with power generation without occupying a dedicated machine as in the conventional isotope production method, which may lead to a reduction in production costs. Furthermore, we propose a scheme from the transmutation of natural Ta to the medical use of Re-186. Produced high-purity Re-185 is chemically separated from other elements, and Re-186 produced by the (n, γ) reaction in the nuclear reactor was used as a radiopharmaceutical. Since some solvent extraction or anion exchange methods, etc., are widely studied for their separation and purification, we will not discuss them in detail here.

2. Analysis Methods

The feasibility of producing Re-185 via the transmutation of natural Ta was investigated using a 100 MWt fast reactor modeled on the experimental fast reactor JOYO with MK-III core. The energy spectrum of neutrons in the fast reactors is harder than that in light water reactors, and it may be possible to adjust the energy by moderator arrangement to achieve highly efficient transmutation, which has been used to study the transmutation of technetium-99 (Tc-99), a long-lived fission product [17].
The main reactor parameters are listed in Table 2. The system was sodium-cooled and uses plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel. The irradiation target pin was placed in the center of the core, as shown in Figure 3. The cylindrical moderator can be placed around the sample. The candidate moderators were zirconium hydride (ZrH1.7) and zirconium deuteride (ZrD1.7); these were selected based on previous studies [13,14,15,16].
The production characteristics were evaluated using a three-dimensional continuous energy Monte Carlo code, MVP version 3 [18], with its burn-up calculation routine MVP-BURN [19]. To accurately simulate the production characteristics from Ta to Re, a transmutation chain model from Ta to osmium (Os), shown in Figure 4, was added to the burn-up chain model “u4cm6fp50bp16F”, which is a standard set in MVP-BURN. The evaluated nuclear data library JENDL-5 [20] was used for the cross-section data. The number of histories and batches were set appropriately to keep the typical statistical error for k-effective below about 0.05% with a 1σ error.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Production of Re-185 via the Transmutation of Natural Ta Compared to Natural W

Table 3 shows the results of Re production via the transmutation of natural Ta and natural W after 1 year of irradiation without moderator and 30 days of cooling. The Re produced from natural Ta has Re-185 with an isotopic purity of 99.9%. On the other hand, the production of Re-185 from natural Ta is not large because it must pass through the production of W. Furthermore, Re-186 and Re-187 were also produced by the n ,   γ reaction of Re-185, albeit in very small amounts.

3.2. Improving the Production Rate of Re-185 from Natural Ta Using a Moderator

3.2.1. Comparison of Re-185 Production Using ZrH1.7 or ZrD1.7 as a Moderator

Table 4 shows the results of Re production from natural Ta when ZrH1.7 or ZrD1.7 is used as moderator, and Table 5 shows the energy-averaged one-group effective cross-section σ ¯ of the n ,   γ reaction for the main nuclides, which is defined as
σ ¯ = σ E ϕ E d E ϕ E d E
where σ E is energy dependent microscopic cross section, and ϕ E is the energy-dependent neutron flux [21]. The neutron energy spectrum in the irradiation target pin is shown in Figure 5.
W (total) and Re-185 production increased with the use of the moderator. In particular, Re-185 production, in the case where the ZrH1.7 moderator was used, increased by more than 200 times compared to the case without the use of the moderator. This is because the effective cross-sections of the major nuclides from Ta to Re tend to be larger in the low-neutron energy [22], and the softening of neutron energy by the moderator increases the n ,   γ reaction rate. On the other hand, in the case where the ZrH1.7 moderator was used, the production ratio of Re-185 was 80.4% of the total Re, which was smaller than in the other cases. This is mainly due to the larger effective cross-sections of W-185 and Re-185, which increased Re-187 production through the production paths shown below.
W n ,   γ 185 W n ,   γ 186   W β 187   R e 187 R e n ,   γ 185 R e n ,   γ 186   R e 187
Here, in addition to the above paths, there are also other paths in which Re-186 is produced by its own β decay to Os-186.
The ZrD1.7 moderator case produced less Re-185 than the ZrH1.7 moderator case but produced Re-185 with an isotopic purity of 99.6%. The effective cross-section of W-184, which directly affects the production of Re-185, was slightly smaller than that of the ZrH1.7 moderator case, but there was no significant difference, while the effective cross-section of Re-185 was about 1/10 smaller than that of the ZrH1.7 moderator case. This is advantageous in preventing the produced Re-185 from being transmuted to another nuclide. These results suggest that the ZrH1.7 moderator is more efficient for the production of W from natural Ta and that the ZrD1.7 moderator is more efficient for the production of Re-185 from W.

3.2.2. Improvement in the Re-185 Production Rate via Two-Step Irradiation with ZrH1.7 and ZrD1.7 Moderators

To further improve the production rate, a two-step production scheme is proposed, in which W is efficiently produced from natural Ta with the ZrH1.7 moderator and Re-185 is efficiently produced from tungsten with the ZrD1.7 moderator. The ratio of the irradiation period with the ZrH1.7 moderator (first-step) and the subsequent irradiation period with the ZrD1.7 moderator (second-step) up to 1 year was studied and the results are shown in Figure 6. Each irradiation period was followed by 15 days of cooling. The best balance for production of irradiation period between the first-step and the second-step was achieved when Z r H 1.7 : Z r D 1.7 = 8   : 4 . The Re-185 produced at this ratio was 2.3 g (about 0.15%/year from natural Ta) and that with an isotopic purity of 95.4%. This is about twice the production rate with the ZrH1.7 moderator, and about 470 times the production rate without moderator over the entire irradiation period. In addition, this results also suggest that the isotopic purity of Re-185 can be controlled by adjusting the balance of irradiation period.

3.3. Estimated Doses of Medical Re-186 Produced from Re185

The dose of Re-186 produced for medical use was estimated, assuming that the Re-185 produced in this study is irradiated in a thermal neutron reactor.
The High Flux Reactor in Petten, which is light-water-cooled and moderated (operated at 45 MWt), was employed, as it is commonly used to produce medical isotopes. The obtained specific radioactivity of Re-186 was 68 GBq/mg after 240 h of irradiation (2.2–3 × 1014 n/cm2/s), with 97.4% Re-185 in that reactor [5]. Therefore, although the ratio of Re-185 is slightly different, the 2.3 g of Re-185 obtained in this study corresponds to more than 150,000 GBq of Re-186. In addition, the maximum tolerated dose of Re-186 HEDP (1-hydroxy-ethylidene-1,1 diphosphonic acid) complex, which is widely used for the palliative treatment of bone metastases caused by breast cancer and prostate cancer, is estimated to be 2.4 GBq [4,23]. Assuming that it takes approximately 1 week from the end of irradiation to the final product and accounting for the decay of radioactivity, the results of this study are equivalent to more than 17,000 doses.

3.4. Scheme for the Production of Medical Re-186 Starting from the Transmutation of Natural Ta

We propose a scheme of transmutation of natural Ta to Re-186 for medical use, as shown in Figure 7. In this study, a 100 MWt fast reactor was used to verify that Re-185 can be produced from natural Ta, but obviously the production Re-185 would be much higher if a large fast reactor were used (as in previous studies). In the chemical separation process, Re-185 could be separated from Ta, W, and Os; for example, Re, W, and Os would be co-separated from Ta by a conventional extraction with Tri-butyl Phosphate in low-concentration nitric acid media. Further, the mutual separation of Re and W would be possible using the separation process of the W-188/Re-188 generator [24]. Further investigations into Os behavior in this separation process are required. The purified Re-185 can be transmuted to Re-186 for medical use through using a nuclear reactor or accelerator-driven neutron sources with n ,   γ reaction. The remaining Ta and W should be recycled for the next irradiation, as it will increase the production rate of Re-185 due to its higher-order W content already produced in the previous irradiation.

4. Conclusions

The feasibility of producing rhenium-185 (Re-185) via nuclear transmutation was evaluated using a continuous energy Monte Carlo code MVP version 3/MVP-BURN. It was found that Re-185 with an isotopic purity of 99% can be produced through the transmutation of natural tantalum (Ta) using a 100 MWt fast reactor. In addition, it was found that the use of moderators is effective in improving the production rate of Re-185. This can be achieved with a zirconium hydride (ZrH1.7) moderator in the main transmutation process from natural Ta to tungsten (W) and with a zirconium deuteride (ZrD1.7) moderator in the main transmutation process from W to Re-185. Through two-step irradiation, first-step irradiation with a ZrH1.7 moderator, and second-step irradiation with a ZrD1.7 moderator, the production rate of Re-185 from natural Ta can be increased by up to 470 times compared with irradiation without a moderator, and 2.3 g of Re-185 can be obtained from 1571 g of natural Ta in 1 year of irradiation. This can be estimated as the raw material for more than 17,000 doses of Re-186 radiopharmaceutical treatment.
A cost evaluation for the practical application of Re-185 production was not performed in this study. We plan to investigate this in a commercial fast reactor and compare it to the conventional isotope production process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.T., T.Y. and M.O.; software, T.Y.; investigation, Y.T.; resources, T.Y.; writing—original draft, Y.T.; writing—review & editing, T.Y. and M.O.; supervision, M.O.; project administration, M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data is available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. John, D.A.; Seal, R.R., II; Polyak, D.E. Rhenium. In Critical Mineral Resources of the United States—Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply; U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802–P; Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Seal, R.R., II, Bradley, D.C., Eds.; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2017; pp. P1–P49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, L.; Tesfaye, F.; Li, X.; Lindberg, D.; Taskinen, P. Review of rhenium extraction and recycling technologies from primary and secondary resources. Miner. Eng. 2021, 161, 106719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. O’Sullivan, J.; McCready, V.; Flux, G.; Norman, A.R.; Buffa, F.M.; Chittenden, S.; Guy, M.; Pomeroy, K.; Cook, G.; Gadd, J.; et al. High activity Rhenium-186 HEDP with autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue: A phase I study in progressive hormone refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Br. J. Cancer 2002, 86, 1715–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Argyrou, M.; Valassi, A.; Andreou, M.; Lyra, M. Dosimetry and Therapeutic Ratios for Rhenium-186 HEDP. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 124603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency. Manual for Reactor Produced Radioisotopes; IAEA-TECDOC-1340; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2003; pp. 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khandaker, M.U.; Nagatsu, K.; Minegishi, K.; Zhang, M.-R.; Jalilian, A.R.; Bradley, D. production of no carrier added 186gRe radionuclide for theranostic applications. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2020, 166, 109843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Moustapha, M.E.; Ehrhardt, G.J.; Smith, C.J.; Szajek, L.P.; Eckelman, W.C.; Jurisson, S.S. Preparation of cyclotron-produced 186Re and comparison with reactor-produced 186Re and generator-produced 188Re for the labeling of bombesin. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006, 33, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lapi, S.; Ruth, T.J.; Becker, D.W.; D’Auria, J.M. US20080241025–Method and Apparatus for ISO Lating The Radioisotope 186Rhenium. U.S. Patent US7708961B2, 4 May 2010. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US42294788 (accessed on 4 June 2023).
  9. Keim, C.P. Enriching Stable Isotopes Electromagnetically. J. Appl. Phys. 1953, 24, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Love, L.O. Electromagnetic Separation of Isotopes at Oak Ridge. Science 1973, 182, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Egle, B.J.; Hart, K.J.; Aaron, W.S. Stable isotope enrichment capabilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 299, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Herrmann, K.; Schwaiger, M.; Lewis, J.S.; Solomon, S.B.; McNeil, B.J.; Baumann, M.; Gambhir, S.S.; Weissleder, R. Radiotheranostics: A roadmap for future development. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 3, e146–e156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yokoyama, T.; Terashima, A.; Ozawa, M. Evaluation of Rhenium Production Rates in Tungsten Irradiated in Fast Reactors by Using Continuous Energy Monte Carlo Code MVP. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Technetium and Rhenium: Science and Utilization, Pornichet, France, 29 September–3 October 2014; pp. 526–532. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yokoyama, T.; Tanoue, Y.; Terashima, A.; Ozawa, M. Optimizing the Transmutation Rate of Tungsten to Rhenium by Using Zirconium Hydride Moderators in Fast Reactors. In Proceedings of the 3rd Japan-China Academic Symposium on Nuclear Fuel Cycle (ASNFC2015), Program and Abstracts, Tokyo, Japan, 2–5 December 2015; pp. 96–97. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yokoyama, T.; Tanoue, Y.; Terashima, A.; Ozawa, M. Production of Rhenium by Transmuting Tungsten Metal in Fast Reactors with Moderator. J. Energy Power Eng. 2016, 10, 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yokoyama, T.; Ozawa, M. Production of Low Activity Rhenium by Transmuting Tungsten Metal in Fast Reactors with Moderator. Int. J. At. Nucl. Phys. 2019, 4, 012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aoyama, T.; Maeda, S.; Maeda, Y.; Suzuki, S. Transmutation of Technetium in the Experimental Fast Reactor “JOYO”. J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 2005, 6, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nagaya, Y.; Keisuke, O.; Sakurai, T.; Mori, T. MVP/GMVP Version 3: General Purpose Monte Carlo Codes for Neutron and Photon Transport Calculations Based on Continuous Energy and Multigroup Methods; JAEA-Data/Code--2016-018; Japan Atomic Energy Agency: Tokai, Japan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Okumura, K.; Mori, T.; Nakagawa, M.; Kaneko, K. Validation of a Continuous-Energy Monte Carlo Burn-up Code MVP-BURN and Its Application to Analysis of Post Irradiation Experiment. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2000, 37, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iwamoto, O.; Iwamoto, N.; Kunieda, S.; Minato, F.; Nakayama, S.; Abe, Y.; Tsubakihara, K.; Okumura, S.; Ishizuka, C.; Yoshida, T.; et al. Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 5: JENDL-5. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kotlyar, D.; Fridman, E.; Shwageraus, E. One-Group Cross-Section Generation for Monte Carlo Burnup Codes: Multigroup Method Extension and Verification. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2015, 179, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chadwick, M.; Herman, M.; Obložinský, P.; Dunn, M.; Danon, Y.; Kahler, A.; Smith, D.; Pritychenko, B.; Arbanas, G.; Arcilla, R.; et al. ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data. Nucl. Data Sheets 2011, 112, 2887–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uccelli, L.; Martini, P.; Urso, L.; Ghirardi, T.; Marvelli, L.; Cittanti, C.; Carnevale, A.; Giganti, M.; Bartolomei, M.; Boschi, A. Rhenium Radioisotopes for Medicine, a Focus on Production and Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boschi, A.; Uccelli, L.; Pasquali, M.; Duatti, A.; Taibi, A.; Pupillo, G.; Esposito, J. 188W/188Re Generator System and Its Therapeutic Applications. J. Chem. 2014, 2014, 529406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transmutation path from natural W to Re. Through the neutron capture reaction with subsequent β decays, Re-185 is produced mainly from W-184. In contrast, Re-187 is produced from W-186.
Figure 1. Transmutation path from natural W to Re. Through the neutron capture reaction with subsequent β decays, Re-185 is produced mainly from W-184. In contrast, Re-187 is produced from W-186.
Jne 04 00039 g001
Figure 2. Transmutation path from natural Ta to Re. W is intermediately produced by the neutron capture reaction of Ta-181.
Figure 2. Transmutation path from natural Ta to Re. W is intermediately produced by the neutron capture reaction of Ta-181.
Jne 04 00039 g002
Figure 3. Irradiation target location. The irradiation target pin is placed in the center of the core. The power is set to 100 MWt.
Figure 3. Irradiation target location. The irradiation target pin is placed in the center of the core. The power is set to 100 MWt.
Jne 04 00039 g003
Figure 4. Transmutation chain model and cross-section library from Ta to Os.
Figure 4. Transmutation chain model and cross-section library from Ta to Os.
Jne 04 00039 g004
Figure 5. (Color online) Neutron energy spectrum in the irradiation target pin with ZrH1.7, ZrD1.7, or no moderator.
Figure 5. (Color online) Neutron energy spectrum in the irradiation target pin with ZrH1.7, ZrD1.7, or no moderator.
Jne 04 00039 g005
Figure 6. Re-185 production and isotopic purity with the ratio of irradiation period with ZrH1.7 and ZrD1.7 moderator up to 1 year irradiation.
Figure 6. Re-185 production and isotopic purity with the ratio of irradiation period with ZrH1.7 and ZrD1.7 moderator up to 1 year irradiation.
Jne 04 00039 g006
Figure 7. Production scheme of medical Re-186 starting from the transmutation of natural Ta. Using a fast reactor, irradiation is divided into two steps to improve the production rate of Re-185. After chemical separation, the remaining Ta and W should be utilized again for the production of Re-185, which will further improve the production rate.
Figure 7. Production scheme of medical Re-186 starting from the transmutation of natural Ta. Using a fast reactor, irradiation is divided into two steps to improve the production rate of Re-185. After chemical separation, the remaining Ta and W should be utilized again for the production of Re-185, which will further improve the production rate.
Jne 04 00039 g007
Table 1. Isotopic composition of natural Re.
Table 1. Isotopic composition of natural Re.
NuclideIsotope RatioHalf-Life
Re-185 37.4 % Stable
Re-187 62.6 % 4.12 × 10 10 y
Table 2. Main core parameters of the fast reactor in this study.
Table 2. Main core parameters of the fast reactor in this study.
Specification Data
Reactor Thermal Power (MWt)100
Number of driver fuel subassembly
(Inner Driver Fuel and Outer Driver Fuel)
77
Equivalent core diameter (cm)80
Core height(cm)50
235U enrichment(wt%)18
Pu content: Pu/(Pu+U)(wt%)16/21 *
Fissile Plutonium content: (239Pu + 241Pu)/(Pu+U)(wt%)12/15 *
Reflector/shielding Steel Special Use Stainless (SUS)/B4C
* Inner Core/Outer Core.
Table 3. Re production from natural Ta and natural W after 1 year of irradiation without a moderator and 30 days of cooling.
Table 3. Re production from natural Ta and natural W after 1 year of irradiation without a moderator and 30 days of cooling.
NuclideIrradiation to Natural TaIrradiation to Natural W
Initial (g)after 1 Year of Irradiation
and 30 Days of Cooling (g)
Initial (g)after 1 Year of Irradiation
and 30 Days of Cooling (g)
Ta-181 1571 1344
W-182 221.3 476.4 452.6
W-183 6.2 258.7 252.1
W-184 0.32 556.9 561.6
W-186 2.1 × 10 7 522.3 505.1
Re-185 4.9 × 10 3
99.96 %
22.0
( 59.9 % )
Re-186 8.3 × 10 8
0.00 %
3.7 × 10 4
0.00 %
Re-187 2.0 × 10 6
0.04 %
14.8
( 40.1 % )
Os (total) 3.7 × 10 4 6.6
Table 4. Re production when either ZrH1.7 or ZrD1.7 are used as a moderator after 1 year of irradiation and 30 days of cooling.
Table 4. Re production when either ZrH1.7 or ZrD1.7 are used as a moderator after 1 year of irradiation and 30 days of cooling.
NuclideInitial (g)After 1 Year of Irradiation and 30 Days of Cooling (g)
with ZrH1.7
Moderator
with ZrD1.7
Moderator
(without Moderator) *
Ta-181 1571 715.1 1170 1344
W-182 552.2
( 64.9 % )
381.5
( 94.6 % )
221.3
( 97.1 % )
W-183 202.7
( 23.5 % )
18.5
( 4.5 % )
6.2
( 2.7 % )
W-184 101.8
( 11.6 % )
3.5
( 0.8 % )
0.32
( 0.1 % )
W-186 1.0 × 10 3
( 0.0 % )
1.7 × 10 5
( 0.0 % )
2.1 × 10 7
( 0.0 % )
W (Total) 856.7
( 100.0 % )
403.5
( 100.0 % )
227.9
( 100.0 % )
Re-185 1.2
( 80.4 % )
0.11
( 99.6 % )
4.9 × 10 3
99.96 %
Re-186 4.9 × 10 4
0.03 %
5.5 × 10 6
0.00 %
8.3 × 10 8
0.00 %
Re-187 0.29
( 19.5 % )
5.0 × 10 4
( 0.4 % )
2.0 × 10 6
0.04 %
Os (Total) 4.75 3.1 × 10 2 3.7 × 10 4
* From Table 3.
Table 5. One-group effective cross-section of main nuclides from Ta to Re with either ZrH1.7, ZrD1.7, or no moderator.
Table 5. One-group effective cross-section of main nuclides from Ta to Re with either ZrH1.7, ZrD1.7, or no moderator.
NuclideThe One-Group Effective Cross-Section (Barn)
with ZrH1.7
Moderator
with ZrD1.7
Moderator
without
Moderator
Ta-181 3.09 0.99 4.79
Ta-182 1285.17 3.34 0.73
Ta-183 19.71 1.89 0.37
W-182 1.68 0.28 0.16
W-183 2.31 1.27 0.38
W-184 0.40 0.36 0.18
W-185 4.80 1.32 0.36
W-186 11.21 0.89 0.13
W-187 8.04 0.87 0.17
W-188 0.66 0.06 0.03
Re-185 32.89 3.37 0.92
Re-186 33.13 4.00 1.04
Re-187 10.16 2.48 0.82
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanoue, Y.; Yokoyama, T.; Ozawa, M. Feasibility Study on Production of High-Purity Rhenium-185 by Nuclear Transmutation of Natural Tantalum. J. Nucl. Eng. 2023, 4, 625-633. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030039

AMA Style

Tanoue Y, Yokoyama T, Ozawa M. Feasibility Study on Production of High-Purity Rhenium-185 by Nuclear Transmutation of Natural Tantalum. Journal of Nuclear Engineering. 2023; 4(3):625-633. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanoue, Yuki, Tsugio Yokoyama, and Masaki Ozawa. 2023. "Feasibility Study on Production of High-Purity Rhenium-185 by Nuclear Transmutation of Natural Tantalum" Journal of Nuclear Engineering 4, no. 3: 625-633. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030039

APA Style

Tanoue, Y., Yokoyama, T., & Ozawa, M. (2023). Feasibility Study on Production of High-Purity Rhenium-185 by Nuclear Transmutation of Natural Tantalum. Journal of Nuclear Engineering, 4(3), 625-633. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne4030039

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop