Determinants of Antenatal Care Access and Utilization in Haiti
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Aims
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Variables
2.2. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Antenatal Care (ANC) Use by Haitian Women during Pregnancy
3.2. Sources or Providers of Antenatal Care (ANC) Services
3.3. Association between Sociodemographic Characteristics and ANC Use
3.4. Association between Sociodemographic Characteristics and ANC Access
4. Discussion
4.1. Interpretation of Results
4.2. Strengths and Limitations
4.3. Future Perspectives on Clinical and Research Issues
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pandey, S.; Karki, S. Socio-economic and Demographic Determinants of Antenatal Care Services Utilization in Central Nepal. Int. J. Mch. Aids. 2014, 2, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheffel, A.; Zeger, S.; Heidkamp, R.; Munos, M.K. Development of summary indices of antenatal care service quality in Haiti, Malawi and Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2019, 9, e032558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rurangirwa, A.A.; Mogren, I.; Nyirazinyoye, L.; Ntaganira, J.; Krantz, G. Determinants of poor utilization of antenatal care services among recently delivered women in Rwanda; a population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zanconato, G.; Msolomba, R.; Guarenti, L.; Franchi, M. Antenatal care in developing countries: The need for a tailored model. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006, 11, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, F.W.; Naik, S.I.; Feresu, S.A.; Gebrian, B.; Karki, M.; Harlow, S.D. Perceptions of pregnancy complications in Haiti. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2008, 100, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Data Atlas. Haiti—Maternal Mortality Ratio. Available online: https://knoema.com/atlas/Haiti/Maternal-mortality-ratio (accessed on 26 March 2021).
- UNFPA. World Population Dashboard: Haiti. United Nations Population Fund. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population/HT (accessed on 26 March 2021).
- United Nations Population Fund. Amid Pandemic Disruptions, Haiti’s Midwives Urge Pregnant Women to Continue Antenatal Care. Updated 24 August 2020. Available online: https://www.unfpa.org/news/amid-pandemic-disruptions-haitis-midwives-urge-pregnant-women-continue-antenatal-care (accessed on 23 November 2020).
- World Health Organization; United Nations Children’s Fund; United Nations Population Fund; World Bank Group; Division UNP. Trends in Maternal Mortality (2000 to 2017): Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/327596/WHO-RHR-19.23-eng.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2023).
- Dev, A.; Kivland, C.; Faustin, M.; Turnier, O.; Bell, T.; Leger, M.D. Perceptions of isolation during facility births in Haiti—A qualitative study. Reprod Health 2019, 16, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziato, L.; Omenyo, C.N. Initiation of traditional birth attendants and their traditional and spiritual practices during pregnancy and childbirth in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018, 18, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashimoto, K.; Adrien, L.; Rajkumar, S. Moving Towards Universal Health Coverage in Haiti. Health Syst. Reform 2020, 6, e1719339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, M.; Bowles, B.C.; Jansen, L.; Leach, J. Childbirth education in rural Haiti: Reviving low-tech teaching strategies. J. Perinat. Educ. Spring 2013, 22, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavagnero, E.D.; Cros, M.J.; Dunworth, A.J.; Channa, S.M. Better Spending, Better Care: A Look at Haiti’s Health Financing: Summary Report (English); The World Bank Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Volume 1, p. 116682. Available online: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/393291498246075986/summary-report (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Mirkovic, K.R.; Lathrop, E.; Hulland, E.N.; Jean-Louis, R.; Lauture, D.; D’Alexis, G.D.; Handzel, E.; Grand-Pierre, R. Quality and uptake of antenatal and postnatal care in Haiti. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO; UNAIDS; UNGPA; UNICEF; UNWomen; The World Bank Group. Survive, Thrive, Transform. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health: 2018 Report on Progress towards 2030 Targets. 2018. Available online: https://www.everywomaneverychild.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/EWECGSMonitoringReport2018.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2021).
- OECD; The World Bank. Health at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald, T.; Dorcely, O.; Ewusie, J.E.; Darling, E.K.; Moll, S.; Mbuagbaw, L. The effect of a new maternity unit on maternal outcomes in rural Haiti: An interrupted time series study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The DHS Program, Institut Haïtien de l’Enfance Pétion-Ville Haïti, USAID, UNFPA, Canada. Haiti: Enquête Mortalité, Morbidité et Utilisation des Services (EMMUS-VI). 2016–2017. Final Report. 2020. FR326. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/survey/survey-display-503.cfm (accessed on 8 September 2022).
- Dankwah, E.; Zeng, W.; Feng, C.; Kirychuk, S.; Farag, M. The social determinants of health facility delivery in Ghana. Reprod Health 2019, 16, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tessema, Z.; Minyihun, A. Utilization and Determinants of Antenatal Care Visits in East African Countries: A Multicountry Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys. Adv. Public Health 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berman, P.; Laura, R. The role of private providers in maternal and child health and family planning services in developing countries. Health Policy Plan. 1996, 11, 142–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.; IBM Corp: Armonk, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bayati, T.; Dehghan, A.; Bonyadi, F.; Bazrafkan, L. Investigating the effect of education on health literacy and its relation to health-promoting behaviors in health center. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2018, 7, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tran, T.K.; Nguyen, C.T.K.; Nguyen, H.D.; Eriksson, B.; Bondjers, G.; Gottvall, K.; Ascher, H.; Petzold, M. Urban—rural disparities in antenatal care utilization: A study of two cohorts of pregnant women in Vietnam. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2011, 11, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muchie, K.F. Quality of antenatal care services and completion of four or more antenatal care visits in Ethiopia: A finding based on a demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017, 17, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oyinlola, O.A.; Sunmola, A.; Opayemi, A.S.; Mayungbo, O. Barriers to Antenatal Care Use, Child Birth Experience and Level of Education on Actual Attendance among Pregnant Women. Int. J. Psychol. Educ. Stud. 2018, 5, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muyunda, B.; Makasa, M.; Jacobs, C.; Musonda, P.; Michelo, C. Higher Educational Attainment Associated with Optimal Antenatal Care Visits among Childbearing Women in Zambia. Front. Public Health 2016, 4, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs, L.D.; Judd, T.M.; Bhutta, Z.A. Addressing the Child and Maternal Mortality Crisis in Haiti through a Central Referral Hospital Providing Countrywide Care. Perm. J. Spring 2016, 20, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afulani, P.A. Rural/urban and socioeconomic differentials in quality of antenatal care in Ghana. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finlayson, K.; Downe, S. Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PLoS Med. 2013, 10, e1001373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Houweling, T.A.J.; Ronsmans, C.; Campbell, O.M.R.; Kunst, A.E. Huge poor–rich inequalities in maternity care: An international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arthur, E. Wealth and antenatal care use: Implications for maternal health care utilisation in Ghana. Health Econ. Rev. 2012, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amo-Adjei, J.; Aduo-Adjei, K.; Opoku-Nyamaah, C.; Izugbara, C. Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durham, J.; Michael, M.; Hill, P.S.; Paviignani, E. Haïti and the health marketplace: The role of the private, informal market in filling the gaps left by the state. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015, 15, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peragallo Urrutia, R.; Merisier, D.; Small, M.; Urrutia, E.; Tinfo, N.; Walmer, D.K. Unmet health needs identified by Haitian women as priorities for attention: A qualitative study. Reprod Health Matters 2012, 20, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raymondville, M.; Rodriguez, C.A.; Richterman, A.; Jerome, G.; Katz, A.; Gilbert, H.; Anderson, G.; Joseph, J.P.; Franke, M.E.; Ivers, L.C. Barriers and facilitators influencing facility-based childbirth in rural Haiti: A mixed method study with a convergent design. BMJ Global Health 2020, 5, e002526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan American Health Organisation; World Health Organisation. Haiti. PAHO. 19 March 2021. Available online: https://www.paho.org/salud-en-las-americas-2017/?p=4110 (accessed on 28 December 2020).
- The World Bank. The World Bank in Haiti: Overview. 26 April 2021, 2021. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/haiti/overview (accessed on 4 May 2021).
- Tann, C.J.; Kizza, M.; Morison, L.; Mabey, D.; Muwanga, M.; Grosskurth, H.; Elliott, A.M. Use of antenatal services and delivery care in Entebbe, Uganda: A community survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llopis, J.; Perge, E.B. Haitian Women are Dying Due to Lack of Maternal Care. Here’s How We Can Change That. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/08/mothers-haiti-receive-maternal-care (accessed on 23 October 2020).
Antenatal Care Visits during Pregnancy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | No Visits | 1–3 Visits | ≥4 Visits | p Value 3 | |
n (%) 2 | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
Total sample | 4890 (100%) | 419 (8.6%) | 1209 (24.7%) | 3262 (66.7%) | |
Education level | <0.0001 | ||||
No education | 890 (18.2%) | 187 (21.0%) | 297 (33.4%) | 405 (45.6%) | |
Primary education | 1843 (37.7%) | 162 (8.8%) | 551 (29.9%) | 1129 (61.3%) | |
Secondary education | 1963 (40.2%) | 70 (3.6%) | 350 (17.8%) | 1544 (78.6%) | |
Higher education | 194 (4.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (5.2%) | 184 (94.8%) | |
Residence | <0.0001 | ||||
Urban | 1842 (37.7%) | 119 (6.5%) | 321 (17.4%) | 1402 (76.1%) | |
Rural | 3048 (62.3%) | 300 (9.8%) | 888 (29.1%) | 1860 (61.0%) | |
Wealth Index | <0.0001 | ||||
Poor | 2053 (42.0%) | 279 (13.6%) | 690 (33.6%) | 1084 (52.8%) | |
Middle | 1046 (21.4%) | 73 (7.0%) | 247 (23.6%) | 726 (69.4%) | |
Rich | 1791 (36.6%) | 67 (3.7%) | 272 (15.2%) | 1452 (81.1%) | |
Marital Status | 0.197 | ||||
Never married | 388 (7.9%) | 31 (8.0%) | 113 (29.1%) | 244 (62.9%) | |
Married/Living with partner | 4129 (84.4%) | 350 (8.5%) | 1002 (24.3%) | 2777 (67.3%) | |
Divorced/Separated/Widowed | 373 (7.6%) | 38 (10.2%) | 94 (25.2%) | 241 (64.6%) | |
Mother’s age | <0.0001 | ||||
Teenager (15–19 years) | 254 (5.2%) | 24 (9.4%) | 91 (35.8%) | 139 (54.7%) | |
Young adult (20–34 years) | 3327 (68.0%) | 243 (7.3%) | 829 (24.9%) | 2255 (67.8%) | |
Mature adult (35–49 years) | 1310 (26.8%) | 152 (11.6%) | 289 (22.1%) | 868 (66.3%) | |
Parity | <0.000 | ||||
One child | 1491 (30.5%) | 47 (3.2%) | 342 (23.0%) | 1101 (73.9%) | |
More than one child | 3399 (69.5%) | 372 (10.9%) | 866 (25.5%) | 2161 (63.6%) | |
Occupation | <0.000 | ||||
Not employed | 1617 (33.1%) | 143 (8.8%) | 462 (28.6%) | 1013 (62.6%) | |
Professional/technical/managerial | 277 (5.7%) | 7 (2.5%) | 25 (9.0%) | 245 (88.4%) | |
Sales | 2447 (50.0%) | 190 (7.8%) | 563 (23.0%) | 1694 (69.2%) | |
Agricultural work | 298 (6.1%) | 59 (19.9%) | 96 (32.3%) | 142 (47.8%) | |
Others | 252 (5.1%) | 21 (8.3%) | 62 (24.6%) | 169 (67.1%) |
Access to Antenatal Care Services during Pregnancy | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Public Sector ANC (n/%) 2 | Private Sector ANC (n/%) | Home/Other ANC (n/%) | p-Value | |
Total Sample | 3384 (82.6%) | 610 (14.9%) | 103 (2.5%) | |
Education level | <0.0001 | |||
No education | 575 (17.0%) | 55 (9.0%) | 21 (20.4%) | |
Primary education | 1355 (40.0%) | 154 (25.2%) | 40 (38.8%) | |
Secondary education | 1352 (40.0%) | 316 (51.8%) | 37 (35.9%) | |
Higher education | 102 (3.0%) | 85 (13.9%) | 5 (4.9%) | |
Residence | <0.0001 | |||
Urban | 1210 (35.8%) | 2174 (64.2%) | 47 (45.6%) | |
Rural | 2174 (64.2%) | 285 (46.7%) | 56 (54.4%) | |
Wealth Index | <0.0001 | |||
Poor | 1472 (43.5%) | 153 (25.1%) | 38 (37.3%) | |
Middle | 736 (21.7%) | 110 (18.0%) | 21 (20.6%) | |
Rich | 1176 (34.8%) | 347 (56.9%) | 43 (42.2%) | |
Marital Status | 0.059 | |||
Never married | 267 (7.9%) | 53 (8.7%) | 10 (9.7%) | |
Married/Living with partner | 2847 (84.1%) | 528 (86.6%) | 83 (80.6%) | |
Divorced/Separated/Widowed | 270 (8.0%) | 29 (4.8%) | 10 (9.7%) | |
Mother’s age | 0.100 | |||
Teenager (15–19 years) | 189 (5.6%) | 22 (3.6%) | 6 (5.8%) | |
Young adult (20–34 years) | 2339 (69.1%) | 419 (68.7%) | 78 (75.7%) | |
Mature adult (35–49 years) | 855 (25.3%) | 169 (27.7%) | 19 (18.4%) | |
Parity | 0.030 | |||
One child | 1070 (31.6%) | 225 (36.9%) | 30 (29.1%) | |
More than one child | 2313 (68.4%) | 385 (63.1%) | 73 (70.9%) | |
Occupation | 0.000 | |||
Not employed | 1111 (32.8%) | 210 (34.4%) | 33 (32.7%) | |
Professional/technical/managerial | 159 (4.7%) | 75 (12.3%) | 7 (6.9%) | |
Sales | 1747 (51.6%) | 269 (44.0%) | 50 (49.5%) | |
Agricultural work | 196 (5.8%) | 15 (2.5%) | 4 (4.0%) | |
Others | 171 (5.1%) | 42 (6.9%) | 7 (6.9%) |
Antenatal Care Visits | Antenatal Care Access | |
---|---|---|
(>4 ANC Visits) | (Public Sector ANC) | |
OR 2 (95% CI 3) | OR (95% CI) | |
Education level | ||
No education | Ref | Ref |
Primary education | 1.78 (1.49–2.12) | 0.86 (0.61–1.21) |
Secondary education | 3.00 (2.44–3.68) | 0.50 (0.35–0.71) |
Higher education | 9.59 (4.89–18.81) | 0.19 (0.12–0.30) |
Residence | ||
Urban | Ref | Ref |
Rural | 1.14 (0.95–1.36) | 1.20 (0.96–1.51) |
Wealth Index | ||
Poor | Ref | Ref |
Middle | 1.60 (1.34–1.92) | 0.93 (0.70–1.23) |
Rich | 2.49 (2.02–3.08) | 0.67 (0.50–0.89) |
Marital Status | ||
Never married | Ref | Ref |
Married/Living with partner | 1.63 (1.27–2.10) | 0.95 (0.68–1.34) |
Divorced/Separated/Widowed | 1.43 (1.03–1.99) | 1.71 (1.03–2.84) |
Mother’s age | ||
Teenager (15–19 years) | Ref | Ref |
Young adult (20–34 years) | 1.47 (1.10–1.97) | 0.85 (0.53–1.38) |
Mature adult (35–49 years) | 1.97 (1.42–2.73) | 0.63 (0.38–1.07) |
Parity | ||
Only 1 child | Ref | Ref |
More than 1 child | 0.69 (0.58–0.82) | 0.93 (0.75–1.16) |
Occupation | ||
Not employed | Ref | Ref |
Professional/technical/managerial | 2.10 (1.40–3.14) | 0.84 (0.59–1.18) |
Sales | 1.41 (1.22–1.64) | 1.18 (0.96–1.45) |
Agricultural work | 1.02 (0.78–1.34) | 1.59 (0.90–2.82) |
Other | 1.05 (0.78–1.42) | 0.80 (0.55–1.18) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Obioha, C.U.; Martin, M.-P.; Obioha, O.A.; Villalba, K.; Del Pino Espejo, M.-J.; Curtis, D.; Padron-Monedero, A. Determinants of Antenatal Care Access and Utilization in Haiti. Women 2023, 3, 152-162. https://doi.org/10.3390/women3010012
Obioha CU, Martin M-P, Obioha OA, Villalba K, Del Pino Espejo M-J, Curtis D, Padron-Monedero A. Determinants of Antenatal Care Access and Utilization in Haiti. Women. 2023; 3(1):152-162. https://doi.org/10.3390/women3010012
Chicago/Turabian StyleObioha, Chinedu U., Maria-Pilar Martin, Ogochukwu A. Obioha, Karina Villalba, Maria-Jose Del Pino Espejo, Denice Curtis, and Alicia Padron-Monedero. 2023. "Determinants of Antenatal Care Access and Utilization in Haiti" Women 3, no. 1: 152-162. https://doi.org/10.3390/women3010012
APA StyleObioha, C. U., Martin, M. -P., Obioha, O. A., Villalba, K., Del Pino Espejo, M. -J., Curtis, D., & Padron-Monedero, A. (2023). Determinants of Antenatal Care Access and Utilization in Haiti. Women, 3(1), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.3390/women3010012