Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulations of Large-Amplitude Acoustic Oscillations in Cryogenic Hydrogen at Pipe Exit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dry-Oxidative Reforming of Biogas for Hydrogen Generation over Ca and Mg-Promoted Titania-Supported Nickel Catalyst

1
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382355, Gujarat, India
2
Department of Energy & Environment, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology, Patiala 147004, Punjab, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrogen 2025, 6(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6030064
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 28 August 2025 / Accepted: 30 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025

Abstract

Hydrogen is gaining significant interest from researchers because of its renewable and clean nature. In this study, we explored the effects of promoters and oxygen addition on biogas reforming. The promotion of catalysts with alkaline earth metals (Ca and Mg) improved the basicity of the catalyst, leading to enhanced catalytic activity and stability. The promotion of the Ni/TiO2 catalyst with Ca showed higher CH4 conversion and H2 yield compared to the bare and Mg-Ni/TiO2 catalysts. The enhanced activity of Ca-Ni/TiO2 could be attributed to its high dispersion, small particulate size, and strong metal–support interaction. Adding oxygen to the reactor feed improved the activity and stability of the catalyst due to the simultaneous occurrence of dry and partial oxidative reforming. The maximum CH4 conversion and H2 yield of 81.13 and 37.5% were obtained at 800 °C under dry reforming conditions, which increased to 96 and 57.6% under dry-oxidative reforming (O2/CH4 = 0.5). The CHNS analysis of the spent Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst also showed carbon deposition of only 0.58% after 24 h of continuous dry-oxidative reforming compared to 25.16% under continuous dry reforming reaction. XRD analysis of the spent catalyst also confirmed the formation of carbon deposits under dry reforming. Adding oxygen to the feed resulted in the simultaneous removal of carbon species formed over the catalytic surface through gasification. These findings demonstrate that Ca promotion combined with oxygen addition significantly improves the catalyst efficiency and durability, offering a promising pathway for stable, long-term hydrogen generation. The results highlight the potential of Ca–Ni/TiO2 catalysts for integration into biogas reforming units at an industrial scale, supporting renewable hydrogen production and carbon mitigation in future energy systems.

1. Introduction

The over-reliance on fossil fuels and fluctuating oil prices, coupled with the energy security crisis, has thrust the quest for renewable and clean energy sources. Hydrogen has been foreseen as a future fuel due to its renewable and clean nature [1,2,3]. Moreover, it can be produced from various sources, such as natural gas, water, biogas, and coal. The easy and domestic availability of biogas makes it an attractive candidate for hydrogen generation applications. The two significant constituents of biogas, i.e., methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2), produce hydrogen through the dry reforming route [4].
Dry reforming (DR; Equation (1)) has gained significant interest in recent years due to its environmentally friendly nature, owing to its ability to consume two major greenhouse gases (CH4 and CO2) for the production of valuable synthetic gas [5,6,7]. It produces synthetic gas with an H2/CO ratio of approximately one, which can be utilized for various downstream applications such as hydrogen, methanol, ammonia, and synthetic fuels [8,9,10,11]. DR is highly endothermic and requires a minimum temperature of at least 550 °C. Various sources, such as landfill gas, biogas, and natural gas, can be employed in this reforming [12,13,14,15].
CH 4 + CO 2     2 H 2 + 2 CO Δ H 298 K ° = 247   kJ / mol
The main dry reforming is usually accompanied by reverse water gas shift reaction (RWGS; Equation (2)), which consumes CO2 and H2 to produce H2O and CO. It also reduces the overall H2/CO ratio in the reforming reaction.
CO 2 + H 2     CO + H 2 O Δ H 298 K ° = 41   kJ / mol
The other important side reaction is methane cracking (Equation (3)) and the Boudouard reaction (Equation (4)), which also co-occur with the primary dry reforming reaction and cause the deposition of carbon and catalyst deactivation.
CH 4     C + 2 H 2 Δ H 298 K ° = 75   kJ / mol
2 CO     C + CO 2 Δ H 298 K ° = 172   kJ / mol
Various noble (Pt, Pd, and Ru), as well as non-noble metals (Ni and Co), supported over metal oxides, have been reported extensively for dry reforming reactions [16,17,18,19]. However, nickel-based catalysts are primarily used owing to their comparative activity, easy availability, and lower cost when compared to noble metals [20,21,22,23]. Nonetheless, these catalysts are vulnerable to deactivation owing to the rapid carbon formation and reoxidation of the active phases. Therefore, efforts have been made to enhance their stability and activity by altering the nature of support, adding promoters, and making bimetallic catalysts [24,25,26,27,28].
The addition of promoters influences the acidity and basicity, dispersion of active sites, and metal–support interaction of the catalysts, significantly controlling their activity and stability [29]. It has been shown that an increase in the adsorption of CO2 promotes the gasification of carbon deposits (CO2 + C → 2CO), and thus retard the deactivation of catalysts [30,31]. The slightly acidic nature of CO2 promotes the addition of basic compounds to the catalyst for increasing its alkalinity. Various alkali, alkaline, and rare-earth metals have been extensively used for this purpose. Liu et al. (2018) [32] presented the promotional effects of Mg on the natural clay-based Ni-catalysts for dry reforming reactions. They demonstrated that enhanced basicity of the catalyst and higher dispersion of active nickel metal contributed to improved catalytic performance. However, carbon deposition was also found to be higher due to enhanced activation of the C-H bond [32]. Al-Fatesh et al. (2019) [33] inferred the effects of CeO2 and Mg promotion on the titania-doped Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst and showed improved catalytic activity when compared to the un-promoted catalyst due to improved metal–support association, textural properties, and reduction behavior of the promoted catalysts. However, the stability of the catalyst was not improved due to the formation of graphitic carbon with the addition of promoters [33]. Wei et al. (2018) [34] showed that the addition of Mg to a Ni-Al catalyst improved the surface area, metal dispersion, and metal–support interaction. The promoted catalysts also possessed higher basicity than the unpromoted catalysts. The promoted catalyst demonstrated high CH4 conversion, H2/CO ratio, and H2 selectivity and suppressed the coke formation in combined partial oxidative-dry reforming [34]. Ma et al. (2019) [35] presented the effects of MgO and CeO2 on the Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for partial oxidative reforming of methane. They demonstrated that the promoters’ synergetic product enhances the catalyst’s reducibility and greatly improves the catalyst’s performance [35]. Sun et al. (2020) [36] showed that promoting Ni-HMS catalyst with CaO enhanced the metal–support interaction and inhibited the formation of carbon deposits. They postulated that CaO promotion enhanced the adsorption of CO2, which accelerated carbon removal [36]. Hambali et al. [37] also studied the effects of various promoters (Ca, Ga, Mg, and Ta) on the Ni/ZSM-5 catalyst for methane dry reforming. They showed that promoters significantly altered the acid-basic site distribution and the metal–support interaction, resulting in improved catalytic activity and stability [37]. Singha et al. [38] also presented that redox properties of CeO2 and basic nature of MgO effectively controlled the coke deposition and showed good stability for time of stream (TOS) of 24 h at 800 °C, owing to robust metal–support interaction, smaller particle sizes, and improved dispersion [38]. Fakeeha et al. [39] also explored the promotional effects of CuO, ZnO, Ga2O3, and Gd2O3 on the activity and stability of Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst and reported that moderate and strong metal–support interaction provided high stability to catalysts [39].
The promotional effects of Ca and Mg on various supported catalysts have been extensively reported. However, a comparative study on their promotional effects on TiO2-supported Ni catalysts has not been reported previously. Therefore, the present study focused on the promotional effects of Ca and Mg on the catalytic activity of Ni/TiO2 catalysts.
Biogas dry reforming is environmentally friendly; however, its high endothermic nature and susceptibility to coke deposition on the catalyst surface hinder its industrial application. Moreover, adding oxygen to the reaction feed enhanced the performance of the reforming reactor. The O2 introduction to the feed retards the carbon accumulation on the catalytic surface through the gasification reaction, which enhances the catalyst’s stability [40]. It also lowers the maximum temperature required for the reforming response due to the synergic effects of partial oxidation and higher affinity of CH4 towards O2 [41].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Catalyst Synthesis

The promoted catalysts were synthesized by the two-step wet-impregnation method for investigating the effects of Ca and Mg. A two-step impregnation method was adopted instead of conventional sequential and co-impregnation methods to understand the effects of the promoters [2,28]. The concentrations of nickel metal and promoters were kept at 11 wt.% and 5 wt.%, respectively, based on previous studies [28]. Prior to impregnation, to remove the impurities, 5.0 g of TiO2 support was calcined at 650 °C for 2 h in air. A 0.5 M Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (supplied by Loba Chemie, Mumbai, India) solution was prepared in 50 mL of DI water–ethanol mixture and added dropwise under vigorous stirring. After impregnation, the mixture was aged for 12 h at room temperature, dried overnight at 110 °C, and calcined in air at 600 °C for 4 h. For promoter addition, 0.25 M Ca(NO3)2·4H2O and Mg(NO3)2·6H2O (both procured from Loba Chemie, Mumbai, India) solutions were similarly impregnated, followed by drying overnight at 110 °C and calcining at 600 °C for 4 h in a muffle furnace. The catalysts were reduced at 800 °C in a 10% H2/N2 flow for 4 h prior to catalytic testing. The synthesized promoted catalysts were termed NT, NTC, and NTM, representing Ni/TiO2, Ca-promoted Ni/TiO2, and Mg-promoted Ni/TiO2, respectively.

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

XRD analysis for obtaining the diffraction patterns was performed using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54060 Å) with a Rigaku Ultima IV Advance diffractometer housed at SAI labs, TIET Patiala. The scanning step for both fresh and spent catalysts was maintained at 0.02° in the range from 20° to 80°. The average nickel metal crystallite sizes corresponding to the (111) diffraction peak were calculated using the Scherrer equation ( L = 0.9 λ / β cos θ ).
The surface morphology of the prepared catalysts was assessed using FESEM-EDS analysis performed on a Hitachi SU 8010 instrument working at an operating voltage of 5.0 kV. Hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) experiments were performed using a mass spectrometer (Pfeiffer Vacuum, model Thermo star Omni GSD350). Prior to analysis, the samples were pre-treated under a N2 atmosphere at 150 °C for one hour and then cooled to room temperature to remove surface impurities and moisture. For H2-TPR analysis, all catalysts were heated in a quartz tube reactor under H2 (10%)/N2 flow rate of 20 cm3/min from RT to 800 °C with a constant heating rate of 10 °C/min.
The characterizations of spent catalysts were also performed using a CHNS analyzer (Make-Thermo Scientific Flash 2000, Dreieich, Germany) and XRD. The carbon deposition (wt. %) using a CHNS analyzer was analyzed through the flash combustion (at 960 °C) of samples for their complete and instantaneous oxidation. The combustion products were identified using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).

2.3. Catalytic Reforming

The lab-synthesized catalysts were employed for dry and dry oxidative reforming in a down-flow, fixed-bed reactor under ambient pressure conditions. The setup details of the reforming reactor have been previously provided [28]. The catalytic activity was tested in the temperature range of 650–800 °C. The catalytic dry reforming reaction was conducted with a 1.5:1.0 ratio of CH4:CO2 since biogas is comprised of a 1.5:1.0 ratio of CH4:CO2, and the O2/CH4 ratio was varied from 0 to 0.5 for dry-oxidative reforming. The sandwiched catalyst (150 mg) between two layers of quartz wool was placed in the middle of the tubular reactor. Prior to the reforming reaction, the catalysts were reduced by keeping them in a hydrogen atmosphere at 800 °C for 4 h. The reaction temperature was attained with the help of carrier inert gas (N2) before introducing the reactant gases. The outlet gases from the reactor were then dried through a condenser and a liquid–gas separator, and then monitored using a continuous biogas analyser. The catalytic activity was assessed after every 2 h of reaction at a fixed temperature and O2/CH4 ratio. The better-promoted catalyst and the Ni/TiO2 catalyst were then compared for stability and coke deposition tests. The reactant conversion and product yield were calculated according to previously reported formulas [28].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterization of Catalysts

The lab-synthesized catalysts were characterized through XRD, FESEM-EDS, BET, and H2-TPR techniques. The amount of carbon deposition over spent catalysts was calculated through the CHNS analyzer.
Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern of the lab-prepared fresh catalysts. The diffraction peaks of different phases of the TiO2 support were obtained in the XRD spectra. The characteristic peak at 2θ = 27.5°, 36.2°, 39.3°, 41.3°, 54.5°, 56.8°, 62.9°, 64.3°, and 70.0° corresponding to (110), (101), (200), (111), (211), (220), (002), (310), and (112) indicate the rutile phase of TiO2 support (JCPDS No: 01-078-1510). Whereas the diffraction peaks at 25.4°, 37.9°, 42.8°, and 55.2° correspond to (101), (004), (200), and (211), respectively, indicating the presence of anatase phase TiO2 support (JCPDS No: 01-073-1764). The diffraction peaks of nickel oxides [JCPDS No: 01-070-0989] were also observed at 44.6°, 51.9°, 76.5°, corresponding to (111), (200), (220) phases, respectively. The XRD spectra of the magnesium-promoted catalyst demonstrated the interaction of Mg and Ni/TiO2 catalyst. The formation of magnesium complexes with titanium oxide support can be confirmed through the XRD spectra. The diffraction peaks obtained at 32.9°, 35.5°, 40.6°, 49.2°, 56.9°, 62.1°, and 75.1° correspond to (104), (110), (11-3), (024), (018), (12-4), and (220) phases magnesium titanium oxide [JCPDS No: 01-079-0831]. In Mg-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst, the diffraction peaks at 24.1°, 32.9°, 35.5°, 40.7°, 49.2°, 53.7°, 62.2°, and 63.8° corresponding to (012), (104), (110), (11-3), (024), (11-6), (12-4), and (300) phases represent the nickel-titanium oxide [JCPDS No. 01-083-0199]. The XRD spectra of Ca-promoted Ni/TiO2 also confirmed the formation of the calcium complex with titanium oxide. The peaks at 23.2°, 33.3°, 47.6°, 54.7°, and 59.4°, corresponding to (110), (200), (004), (131), and (204) phases, respectively, demonstrated the presence of calcium titanium oxide [JCPDS No: 01-082-0228]. The presence of the spinal phase in promoted catalysts shows superior metal–support interaction as compared to pristine catalysts [42]. The XRD spectrum of all lab-synthesized catalysts (un-promoted and promoted) showed that the alkaline earth metals have a good interaction with the support material of the catalyst.
The NiO crystallite sizes were obtained using the Scherrer formula on the XRD peak at 2θ = 44.6° and recorded as 23.97, 23.95, and 18.92 nm for NT, NTM, and NTC, respectively. The literature also shows that crystallite size reduces with the incorporation of promoters, owing to the improved dispersion of metal with promoter assistance [29,43]. Similarly, Mosavati et al. [44] showed a reduction in the Ni crystallite size with the incorporation of Ce promoters. Furthermore, they showed that metal particle agglomeration was also countered by the improved metal–support interaction due to promoters’ “spacer” effect [44]. Moreover, the larger ionic radius of Ca2+ allows it to be incorporated into the TiO2 lattice, as evidenced by the spinal peaks in the XRD pattern, which leads to a stronger interaction with NiO. This led to the suppression of Ni agglomeration and a smaller Ni crystallite size, as shown by the weakened NiO peak in the XRD pattern. This can lead to greater CO2 adsorption and stronger metal–support interaction for the CaO-promoted catalyst as compared to the MgO-promoted catalyst [45].
The FEMSEM images and corresponding EDS results of the reduced lab-synthesized catalyst are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The FESEM images show the morphology of the lab-synthesized catalysts. The images show that the surface morphology of the catalysts was significantly altered with the promotion of alkaline earth metals. The Ca-promoted catalyst (Ca-Ni/TiO2) had a finer degree of dispersion of metal crystallites on the surface of the catalyst compared to the other two catalysts. The Mg-promoted catalyst (Mg-Ni/TiO2) also exhibited better dispersion over the catalytic surface than the unpromoted catalyst. EDS analysis provides the surface concentration of metals. EDS analysis of all the lab-synthesized catalysts demonstrated the presence of metals on their surfaces. For the promoted catalysts, the EDS analysis confirmed the presence of Ca and Mg metals on the surface of the corresponding promoted catalysts. The higher amount of Ca over the catalytic surface compared to Mg also confirmed the higher dispersion of Ca metal over the catalytic surface. A higher amount of promoters on the catalytic surface provides more active sites on the catalytic surface. Although only one representative image and dataset are presented here for clarity, SEM and EDS measurements were performed at multiple randomly selected regions of each catalyst to ensure representativeness and reliability.
Figure 4 shows the H2-TPR analysis results of the lab-synthesized promoted catalysts. H2-TPR analysis was performed only up to 800 °C, in accordance with the maximum reaction temperature. The peaks observed in the analysis indicated the amount of H2-uptake during the analysis. The intensity of the peak center also represents the degree of interaction between the metal and support. For both promoted catalysts, a higher peak was observed in the high-temperature region of approximately 650 °C. The calcium-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst showed two peaks during the analysis, one smaller peak around 400 °C represented the reduction in loosely interacted metal oxide to metal, and the low intensity of the peak also shows the low concentration [46]. The maximum intensity peaks for the Ca-Ni/TiO2 and Mg-Ni/TiO2 catalysts were observed at 695.3 and 637.9 °C, respectively. The higher reduction temperature of the calcium-promoted catalysts resulted in spinal formation and strong metal–support interactions for the catalyst. The strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) is desired for a stable and active catalyst [47,48]. The deactivation phenomena, such as sintering through the accumulation of metal crystallites and carbon formation, could be countered with SMSI [49,50,51]. The reducibility of the Ca-promoted catalyst was also higher than that of the Mg-promoted catalyst, as shown by the 10% higher H2 consumption during reduction and the large peak area obtained from the TCD signal. This improvement could be attributed to the smaller crystallite size of NiO in the case of Ca-Ni/TiO2, which helped in the revelation of more metal surfaces to the reduction under a reducing atmosphere of H2 [52,53]. These results are consistent with the XRD results.

3.2. Catalytic Activity

3.2.1. Effects of Temperature on Catalytic Activity

The activity of the lab-synthesized promoted catalysts for dry reforming was evaluated in the temperature range of 650–800 °C under ambient pressure. The results of the dry reforming are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The activity of both catalysts was evaluated by comparing them with that of the unpromoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst.
The high endothermic nature of dry reforming and the rapid movement of gaseous particles contributed to increasing catalytic activity with increasing temperature [48]. The CO2 conversion was always higher than the CH4 conversion for both the promoted and un-promoted catalysts owing to the occurrence of the reverse water-gas shift reaction. The higher activation energy of the C-H bond compared to the C-O bond could also be attributed to the lower CH4 conversion compared to CO2 [54]. The experimental analysis showed that the catalytic activity of the Ca-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst was higher than that of the other two catalysts. The Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst exhibited 81.13% CH4 conversion and 94.65% CO2 conversion at 800 °C, with H2 and CO yields of 37.5% and 41.52%, respectively. In contrast, the Mg-Ni/TiO2 catalyst showed 76.6% CH4 conversion and 86.9% CO2 conversion at 800 °C with H2 and CO yields of 34.5 and 39.3%, respectively. The higher activity of the Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst could be attributed to the higher basicity of CaO, strong metal–support interaction (supported by H2-TPR analysis), and higher dispersion of active metal sites (supported by XRD analysis). The higher basicity of CaO promoted the preferential adsorption of CO2 due to its slightly acidic nature, which resulted in higher catalytic activity. Haung et al. and Naeem et al. also reported that the presence of basic components in catalysts improves the adsorption of acidic gases, such as CO2. They also reported that a higher amount of surface electrons and alkaline oxides improves Ni-catalysts’ activity through the adsorption of acidic gases [55,56].
The occurrence of various side reactions, such as methane decomposition (CH4 → C+ 2H2), reverse water–gas shift reaction (CO2 +H2 → CO + H2O), and Boudouard reaction (2CO → C+ CO2), significantly alters the product yield and product ratio [57]. In the present work, side reactions also play an important role, as shown by the lower product ratio than the stoichiometric value of 1. The lower H2 yield when compared to the CO yield also showed the existence of RWGS. Wei et al. also showed that the catalytic activity of the Ni-alumina catalyst was improved after promotion with basic metal oxide due to enhanced CO2 adsorption and Ni metal dispersion [34].

3.2.2. Effects of O2/CH4 Ratio on Catalytic Activity

Figure 7 represents the effects of oxygen addition on the performance of the Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst. The oxygen effects were evaluated by varying the O2/CH4 ratio from 0 to 0.5 in the temperature range of 650–800 °C. The oxygen introduction has shown the positive effects for CH4 conversion, H2 yield, and H2/CO ratio. The CH4 conversion shown in Figure 6a was improved significantly with O2 addition due to the higher affinity of CH4 with O2 and the presence of two oxidants in the inlet feed [58]. The co-occurrence of dry and partial-oxidative reforming improved the conversion of CH4. Moreover, the combined effects of increasing temperature and O2/CH4 ratio had a greater impact on CH4 conversion. The maximum conversion of 96% was observed at an O2/CH4 ratio of 0.5 at 800 °C. The increased CH4 conversion also improved the H2 yield and H2 selectivity, which in turn improved the H2/CO ratio. The higher H2 yield at a lower temperature range could also be attributed to the occurrence of water-gas shift (WGS) reaction, which was also supported by reduced CO2 conversion [10,28]. The WGS reaction is favorable at lower temperatures and consumes carbon monoxide to produce H2 and CO2. The H2 yield and H2/CO ratio attained the maximum values of 57.6% and 1.25, respectively, with an O2/CH4 ratio of 0.5 at 800 °C. Figure 7b shows that an increase in the O2/CH4 ratio negatively affects CO2 conversion. The reduction in CO2 conversion with increasing O2/CH4 ratio could be attributed to the higher affinity of CH4 for O2 compared to CO2 and the occurrence of WGS. However, an increase in temperature improved the CO2 conversion owing to the inhibition of the WGS reaction and promotion of dry reforming. The maximum CO2 conversion was observed under dry reforming reaction conditions (O2/CH4 ratio = 0) at 800 °C. Wei et al. also showed similar effects of O2 addition for combined reforming in their study for Ni-Mg-Al, Ni-Al, and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts [34].

3.3. Stability Analysis of Promoted Catalyst

The stability of the calcium-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst was studied for both dry and oxidative reforming reactions. The results of the stability study are shown in Figure 8. The stability analysis was performed at 800 °C with O2/CH4 ratios of 0 and 0.5 for dry reforming and dry-oxidative reforming, respectively.
The results of the stability and carbon deposition studies are presented in Figure 9. The methane conversion was higher in the case of combined reforming owing to the presence of CO2 and O2. The catalyst exhibited excellent stability under both reforming conditions for up to 20 h of continuous reaction. After 20 h of continuous reforming, the catalytic activity started to decrease under dry reforming conditions owing to coke formation on the catalytic surface. The XRD patterns of the used catalyst (Figure 10) also confirmed the presence of carbon on the catalytic surface. However, under dry-oxidative reforming conditions, carbon deposition was not observed in the XRD pattern. The simultaneous gasification of carbon species formed on the catalytic surface inhibited their accumulation on the surface. The un-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst presented maximum CH4 conversions of 74.07 and 91.10% for dry and dry-oxidative reforming, respectively, and dropped significantly to 50.48 and 85.74%, respectively, after 24 h of continuous reforming. CaO promotion significantly improved the catalytic activity and stability. Ranjbar et al. also showed that CaO addition to Ni/Al2O3 catalyst successfully countered the carbon formation due to smaller particle size and high basicity [59]. Matos et al. also reported that the presence of CaO decreases the tendency of carbon formation through the stabilization of NiO particles due to improved metal–support interaction [60].

4. Conclusions

The present study elaborates on the effects of Ca and Mg promotion on the activity of the Ni/TiO2 catalyst for both dry and dry-oxidative reforming. This study involved the synthesis, characterization, and utilization of promoted Ni/TiO2 catalysts. Characterization showed strong metal–support interactions between the promoters and the catalyst. The Ca-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalysts markedly improved the catalytic activity, H2 yield, and stability for both dry and dry-oxidative reforming of biogas, outperforming Mg-promotion and the unmodified catalyst. The higher activity of Ca-Ni/TiO2 could be attributed to its higher surface area, smaller particle size, better dispersion, and strong metal–support interaction compared to the other catalysts. The oxygenation of the reforming reaction also improved the CH4 conversion and H2 yield owing to the simultaneous occurrence of both dry and partial oxidative reforming. The maximum CH4 conversion and H2 yield of 95.42 and 57.6%, respectively, were achieved at 800 °C and an O2/CH4 ratio of 0.5 using a Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst. The stability of the catalyst was also observed to be higher under dry oxidative reforming than under dry reforming because of the simultaneous gasification of carbon species formed on the catalyst surface by the oxygen present in the feed. Carbon deposition of only 0.6% was observed during dry oxidative reforming using a Ca-promoted Ni/TiO2 catalyst. The Ca-promoted catalyst is a strong candidate for integration into industrial biogas upgrading units, where combined dry and oxidative reforming can deliver high-purity syngas or hydrogen, while simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The study showed that the promotion of the Ni/TiO2 catalyst with alkaline earth metals and the addition of oxygen to the feed had positive impacts on both catalytic activity and stability.
Future work should include the exploration of long-term stability (100 h) for the promoted catalyst. Additionally, further advanced characterizations, such as EDS mapping and CO2/CH4 chemisorption, are required to support and provide a quantitative analysis of metal dispersion.

Author Contributions

H.S.: Synthesis, characterization, catalytic experiments, writing, and editing; P.K.Y.: Characterization, writing, and editing. S.S.: Supervision; A.D.: Conceptualized and supervised the overall experimental work. All authors contributed to data analysis and writing and approved the final submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific funding from any public, government, or private agency.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this study.

References

  1. Abe, H.; Mizoguchi, H.; Eguchi, R.; Hosono, H. Exploration of heterogeneous catalyst for molecular hydrogen ortho-para conversion. Exploration 2024, 4, 20230040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sharma, H.; Dhir, A. Response surface methodology for optimization of dry oxidative reforming for hydrogen enrichment of biogas. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 2875–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, C.; Li, J.; Meng, X.; Chen, Q.; Yan, Z.; Li, J.; Gao, X.; Ueda, S.; Wang, S.; Ai, L.; et al. Research progress of hydrogen production and CO2 fixation in molten slag cooling process. Carbon. Neutralization 2024, 3, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moogi, S.; Hyun Ko, C.; Hoon Rhee, G.; Jeon, B.H.; Ali Khan, M.; Park, Y.K. Influence of catalyst synthesis methods on anti-coking strength of perovskites derived catalysts in biogas dry reforming for syngas production. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, Y.; Jiang, J.; Meng, Y.; Yan, F.; Aihemaiti, A. A review of recent developments in hydrogen production via biogas dry reforming. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pietraszek, A.; Koubaissy, B.; Roger, A.C.; Kiennemann, A. The influence of the support modification over Ni-based catalysts for dry reforming of methane reaction. Catal. Today 2011, 176, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kweon, S.; Kim, Y.W.; Shin, C.H.; Park, M.B.; Min, H.K. Nickel silicate beta zeolite prepared by interzeolite transformation: A highly active and stable catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leba, A.; Yıldırım, R. Determining most effective structural form of nickel-cobalt catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 4268–4283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tomishige, K. Syngas production from methane reforming with CO2/H2O and O2 over NiO–MgO solid solution catalyst in fluidized bed reactors. Catal. Today 2004, 89, 405–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosha, P.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Mahla, S.K.; Dhir, A. Catalytic reforming of synthetic biogas for hydrogen enrichment over Ni supported on ZnO-CeO2 mixed catalyst. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 125, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamzah, A.B.; Fukuda, T.; Ookawara, S.; Yoshikawa, S.; Matsumoto, H. Process intensification of dry reforming of methane by structured catalytic wall-plate microreactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 128636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Serrano-Lotina, A.; Daza, L. Long-term stability test of Ni-based catalyst in carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 474, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lavoie, J.M. Review on dry reforming of methane, a potentially more environmentally friendly approach to the increasing natural gas exploitation. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cruz, P.L.; Navas-Anguita, Z.; Iribarren, D.; Dufour, J. Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via biogas dry reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 11688–11695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Calgaro, C.O.; Perez-Lopez, O.W. Biogas dry reforming for hydrogen production over Ni-M-Al catalysts (M = Mg, Li, Ca, La, Cu, Co, Zn). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17750–17766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alipour, Z.; Rezaei, M.; Meshkani, F. Effect of alkaline earth promoters (MgO, CaO, and BaO) on the activity and coke formation of Ni catalysts supported on nanocrystalline Al2O3 in dry reforming of methane. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2858–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rosha, P.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Mahla, S.K.; Dhir, A. Biogas reforming for hydrogen enrichment by ceria decorated over nickel catalyst supported on titania and alumina. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 21246–21255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rosha, P.; Mohapatra, S.K.; Mahla, S.K.; Dhir, A. Hydrogen enrichment of biogas via dry and autothermal-dry reforming with pure nickel (Ni) nanoparticle. Energy 2019, 172, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar Yadav, P.; Jabotra, G.; Sharma, S. Effect of Partial Noble Metal (M = Pd, Rh, Ru, Pt) Substitution in La1−xSrxCo1−yMyO3 Perovskite-Derived Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane. Hydrogen 2025, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Ren, M.; Li, X.; Hao, Q.; Chen, H.; Ma, X. Ni-based catalysts prepared for CO2 reforming and decomposition of methane. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 205, 112419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siang, T.J.; Singh, S.; Omoregbe, O.; Bach, L.G.; Phuc, N.H.H.; Vo, D.V.N. Hydrogen production from CH4 dry reforming over bimetallic Ni–Co/Al2O3 catalyst. J. Energy Inst. 2018, 91, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yadav, P.K.; Verma, P.; Sharma, S. Bimetal (CuNi and CuCo) substituted CeO2: An approach for low temperature dry reforming of methane. Mol. Catal. 2024, 565, 114398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, K.; Nawaz, M.A.; Liao, G. Progress and Future Challenges in Designing High-Performance Ni/CeO2 Catalysts for CO2 Methanation: A Critical Review. Carbon. Neutralization 2025, 4, e190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sengupta, S.; Deo, G. Modifying alumina with CaO or MgO in supported Ni and Ni-Co catalysts and its effect on dry reforming of CH4. J. CO2 Util. 2015, 10, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, G.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y. A review of CH4–CO2 reforming to synthesis gas over Ni-based catalysts in recent years (2010–2017). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 15030–15054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, A.R.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, J.M.; Choi, J.H.; Bae, J.W. Ni/M-Al2O3 (M = Sm, Ce or Mg) for combined steam and CO2 reforming of CH4 from coke oven gas. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 21, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jin, B.; Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Liang, X. Engineering metal-oxide interface by depositing ZrO2 overcoating on Ni/Al2O3 for dry reforming of methane. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 436, 135195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, H.; Dhir, A. Hydrogen augmentation of biogas through dry reforming over bimetallic nickel-cobalt catalysts supported on titania. Fuel 2020, 279, 118389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bahari, M.B.; Setiabudi, H.D.; Duy Nguyen, T.; Phuong, P.T.T.; Duc Truong, Q.; Abdul Jalil, A.; Ainirazali, N.; Vo, D.-V.N. Insight into the influence of rare-earth promoter (CeO2, La2O3, Y2O3, and Sm2O3) addition toward methane dry reforming over Co/mesoporous alumina catalysts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 228, 115967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Fatesh, A.S.A.; Fakeeha, A.H.; Abasaeed, A.E. Effects of Selected Promoters on Ni/Y-Al2O3 Catalyst Performance in Methane Dry Reforming. Chin. J. Catal. 2011, 32, 1604–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, J.; Peng, X.; Yao, L.; Shen, J.; Tong, D.; Hu, C. The promoting effect of La, Mg, Co and Zn on the activity and stability of Ni/SiO2 catalyst for CO2 reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 7094–7104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, H.; Costa PDa Taief, H.B.H.; Benzina, M.; Gálvez, M.E. Mg-promotion of Ni natural clay-supported catalysts for dry reforming of methane. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 19627–19634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sadeq Al-Fatesh, A.; Olajide Kasim, S.; Aidid Ibrahim, A.; Hamza Fakeeha, A.; Elhag Abasaeed, A.; Alrasheed, R.; Ashamari, R.; Bagabas, A. Combined magnesia, ceria and nickel catalyst supported over γ-alumina doped with titania for dry reforming of methane. Catalysts 2019, 9, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wei, Q.; Gao, X.; Liu, G.; Yang, R.; Zhang, H.; Yang, G.; Yoneyama, Y.; Tsubaki, N. Facile one-step synthesis of mesoporous Ni-Mg-Al catalyst for syngas production using coupled methane reforming process. Fuel 2018, 211, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, Y.; Ma, Y.; Long, G.; Li, J.; Hu, X.; Ye, Z.; Wang, Z.; Buckley, C.E.; Dong, D. Synergistic promotion effect of MgO and CeO2 on nanofibrous Ni/Al2O3 catalysts for methane partial oxidation. Fuel 2019, 258, 116103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wen, J.; Tang, T.; Wang, H.; Liu, M.; Ning, P.; Deng, L.; Shi, Y. Insight into the role of CaO in coke-resistant over Ni-HMS catalysts for CO2 reforming of methane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 521, 146395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hambali, H.U.; Jalil, A.A.; Abdulrasheed, A.A.; Siang, T.J.; Abdullah, T.A.T.; Ahmad, A.; Vo, D.-V.N. Fibrous spherical Ni-M/ZSM-5 (M: Mg, Ca, Ta, Ga) catalysts for methane dry reforming: The interplay between surface acidity-basicity and coking resistance. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020, 44, 5696–5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Singha, R.K.; Yadav, A.; Shukla, A.; Iqbal, Z.; Pendem, C.; Sivakumar, K.; Bal, D.R. Promoting Effect of CeO2 and MgO for CO2 Reforming of Methane over Ni-ZnO Catalyst. Phys. Theor. Chem. 2016, 1, 3075–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fakeeha, A.H.; Bagabas, A.A.; Lanre, M.S.; Osman, A.I.; Kasim, S.O.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Arasheed, R.; Alkhalifa, A.; Elnour, A.Y.; Abasaeed, A.E.; et al. Catalytic performance of metal oxides promoted nickel catalysts supported on mesoporous γ-Alumina in dry reforming of methane. Processes 2020, 8, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chaudhary, P.K.; Koshta, N.; Deo, G. Effect of O2 and temperature on the catalytic performance of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgAl2O4 for the dry reforming of methane (DRM). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 4490–4500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Connor, A.M.; Ross, J.R.H. The effect of O2 addition on the carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Pt/ZrO2 catalysts. Catal. Today 1998, 46, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bahari, M.B.; Setiabudi, H.D.; Nguyen, T.D.; Jalil, A.A.; Ainirazali, N.; Vo, D.V.N. Hydrogen production via CO2-CH4 reforming over cobalt-supported mesoporous alumina: A kinetic evaluation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 24742–24753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Omoregbe, O.; Danh, H.T.; Abidin, S.Z.; Setiabudi, H.D.; Abdullah, B.; Vu, K.B.; Vo, D.-V.N. Influence of Lanthanide Promoters on Ni/SBA-15 Catalysts for Syngas Production by Methane Dry Reforming. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Movasati, A.; Alavi, S.M.; Mazloom, G. CO2 reforming of methane over Ni/ZnAl2O4 catalysts: Influence of Ce addition on activity and stability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 16436–16448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, H.; Mo, W.; He, X.; Fan, X.; Ma, F.; Liu, S.; Tax, D. Effect of Ca Promoter on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al2O3Catalyst for CO2-CH4 Reforming. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 28955–28964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bian, Z.; Suryawinata, I.Y.; Kawi, S. Highly carbon resistant multicore-shell catalyst derived from Ni-Mg phyllosilicate nanotubes@silica for dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 195, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ay, H.; Üner, D. Dry reforming of methane over CeO2 supported Ni, Co and Ni–Co catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 179, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taherian, Z.; Yousefpour, M.; Tajally, M.; Khoshandam, B. Catalytic performance of Samaria-promoted Ni and Co/SBA-15 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 24811–24822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, I.K.; Cho, Y.S.; Choi, G.S.; Park, J.B.; Kim, D.J. The growth mode change in carbon nanotube synthesis in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2004, 13, 1210–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bower, C.; Zhou, O.; Zhu, W.; Werder, D.J.; Jin, S. Nucleation and growth of carbon nanotubes by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lu, Y.; Guo, D.; Ruan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Ma, X. Facile one-pot synthesis of Ni@HSS as a novel yolk-shell structure catalyst for dry reforming of methane. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 24, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mo, L.; Leong, K.K.M.; Kawi, S. A highly dispersed and anti-coking Ni-La2O3/SiO2 catalyst for syngas production from dry carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 2107–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abdulrasheed, A.A.; Jalil, A.A.; Hamid, M.Y.S.; Siang, T.J.; Abdullah, T.A.T. Dry reforming of CH4 over stabilized Ni-La@KCC-1 catalyst: Effects of la promoter and optimization studies using RSM. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 37, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Park, J.H.; Heo, I.; Chang, T.S. Dry reforming of methane over Ni-substituted CaZrNiOx catalyst prepared by the homogeneous deposition method. Catal. Commun. 2019, 120, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huang, X.; Mo, W.; He, X.; Fan, X.; Ma, F.; Tax, D. Effects of Promoters on the Structure, Performance, and Carbon Deposition of Ni-Al2O3Catalysts for CO2-CH4 Reforming. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 16381–16390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Naeem, M.A.; Al-Fatesh, A.S.; Khan, W.U.; Abasaeed, A.E.; Fakeeha, A.H. Syngas Production from Dry Reforming of Methane over Nano Ni Polyol Catalysts. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2013, 4, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Juan-Juan, J.; Román-Martínez, M.C.; Illán-Gómez, M.J. Nickel catalyst activation in the carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Effect of pretreatments. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2009, 355, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lau, C.S.; Tsolakis, A.; Wyszynski, M.L. Biogas upgrade to syn-gas (H2-CO) via dry and oxidative reforming. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ranjbar, A.; Rezaei, M. Dry reforming reaction over nickel catalysts supported on nanocrystalline calcium aluminates with different CaO/Al2O3 ratios. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Matos, J.; Díaz, K.; García, V.; Cordero, T.C.; Brito, J.L. Methane transformation in presence of carbon dioxide on activated carbon supported nickel-calcium catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2006, 109, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the calcined un-promoted and promoted catalysts.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the calcined un-promoted and promoted catalysts.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g001
Figure 2. FESEM images of un-promoted and promoted reduced catalysts: (a) Ni/TiO2, (b) Ca-Ni/TiO2, (c) Mg-Ni/TiO2.
Figure 2. FESEM images of un-promoted and promoted reduced catalysts: (a) Ni/TiO2, (b) Ca-Ni/TiO2, (c) Mg-Ni/TiO2.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g002
Figure 3. EDS results of un-promoted and promoted reduced catalysts: (a) Ni/TiO2, (b) Ca-Ni/TiO2, and (c) Mg-Ni/TiO2.
Figure 3. EDS results of un-promoted and promoted reduced catalysts: (a) Ni/TiO2, (b) Ca-Ni/TiO2, and (c) Mg-Ni/TiO2.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g003
Figure 4. H2-TPR analysis of un-promoted and promoted calcined catalysts.
Figure 4. H2-TPR analysis of un-promoted and promoted calcined catalysts.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g004
Figure 5. Effects of temperature on (a) CH4 conversion and (b) CO2 conversion.
Figure 5. Effects of temperature on (a) CH4 conversion and (b) CO2 conversion.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g005
Figure 6. Effects of temperature on (a) H2 yield, (b) CO yield, (c) H2/CO ratio, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Figure 6. Effects of temperature on (a) H2 yield, (b) CO yield, (c) H2/CO ratio, and (d) H2 selectivity.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g006
Figure 7. Effects of O2/CH4 ratio on (a) CH4 conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) H2 yield, and (d) H2/CO ratio over NTC catalyst in the temperature range of 650–800 °C and O2/CH4 ratio of 0–0.5.
Figure 7. Effects of O2/CH4 ratio on (a) CH4 conversion, (b) CO2 conversion, (c) H2 yield, and (d) H2/CO ratio over NTC catalyst in the temperature range of 650–800 °C and O2/CH4 ratio of 0–0.5.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g007
Figure 8. Stability analysis of Ca-promoted catalyst at 800 °C and O2/CH4 ratio of 0 and 0.5 for dry reforming and dry-oxidative reforming.
Figure 8. Stability analysis of Ca-promoted catalyst at 800 °C and O2/CH4 ratio of 0 and 0.5 for dry reforming and dry-oxidative reforming.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g008
Figure 9. Stability analysis of Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst under dry and dry-oxidative reforming conditions.
Figure 9. Stability analysis of Ca-Ni/TiO2 catalyst under dry and dry-oxidative reforming conditions.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g009
Figure 10. XRD analysis of the spent catalysts used for dry and dry oxidative reforming.
Figure 10. XRD analysis of the spent catalysts used for dry and dry oxidative reforming.
Hydrogen 06 00064 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, H.; Yadav, P.K.; Sharma, S.; Dhir, A. Dry-Oxidative Reforming of Biogas for Hydrogen Generation over Ca and Mg-Promoted Titania-Supported Nickel Catalyst. Hydrogen 2025, 6, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6030064

AMA Style

Sharma H, Yadav PK, Sharma S, Dhir A. Dry-Oxidative Reforming of Biogas for Hydrogen Generation over Ca and Mg-Promoted Titania-Supported Nickel Catalyst. Hydrogen. 2025; 6(3):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6030064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Himanshu, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Sudhanshu Sharma, and Amit Dhir. 2025. "Dry-Oxidative Reforming of Biogas for Hydrogen Generation over Ca and Mg-Promoted Titania-Supported Nickel Catalyst" Hydrogen 6, no. 3: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6030064

APA Style

Sharma, H., Yadav, P. K., Sharma, S., & Dhir, A. (2025). Dry-Oxidative Reforming of Biogas for Hydrogen Generation over Ca and Mg-Promoted Titania-Supported Nickel Catalyst. Hydrogen, 6(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6030064

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop