Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Hydrogen Safety
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. State-of-the-Art-Technologies in Hydrogen Safety
2.1. Conventional Techniques
2.2. Specific AI Techniques
2.2.1. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs)
2.2.2. Machine Learning Algorithms
2.2.3. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
3. Case Studies and Applications
4. Comparative Analysis
5. Safeguarding Hydrogen: Integrating Advances in Materials, Models, and Storage for Enhanced Safety
6. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Nomenclature
Terms | Meaning |
AI | Artificial Intelligence |
ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
RNN | Recurrent Neural Network |
ML | Machine Learning |
CV | Computer Vision |
H2 | Hydrogen gas |
R&D | Research and Development |
WSN | Wireless Sensor Network |
IoT | Internet of Things |
Leakage Detection | Identifying unintended releases of hydrogen |
Explosion Risk Mitigation | Measures to reduce the potential for hydrogen explosions |
Infrastructure Development Planning | Strategic planning for hydrogen infrastructure |
Dispersion Behavior Prediction | Forecasting how hydrogen disperses in various environments |
Combustion Characteristic Analysis | Studying how hydrogen burns under different conditions |
Public Perception Management | Addressing public concerns and understanding about hydrogen safety |
Emergency Response Planning | Preparing for and managing hydrogen-related emergencies |
Environmental Impact Assessment | Evaluating the environmental effects of hydrogen use |
References
- Ocko, I.B.; Hamburg, S.P. Climate consequences of hydrogen emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2022, 22, 9349–9368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-06/Harnessing_Green_Hydrogen_V21_DIGITAL_29062022.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2024).
- Jahangiri, M.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Rahman Habib, H.U.; Saghaei, H.; Waqar, A. Effect of emission penalty and annual interest rate on cogeneration of electricity, heat, and hydrogen in Karachi: 3E assessment and sensitivity analysis. J. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6679358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amjad, F.; Agyekum, E.B.; Wassan, N. Identification of appropriate sites for solar-based green hydrogen production using a combination of density-based clustering, Best-Worst Method, and Spatial GIS. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 68, 1281–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IEC 60079; Explosive Atmospheres. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- IEC 80079; Explosive Atmospheres. International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
- ISO 22734; Hydrogen Generators Using Water Electrolysis Process—Industrial, Commercial, and Residential Applications. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
- ISO 19880-1; Gaseous Hydrogen—Fueling Stations—Part 1: General Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
- Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Gao, W. Experimental investigation on unconfined hydrogen explosion with different ignition height. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 20112–20123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarhan, C.; Çil, M.A. A study on hydrogen, the clean energy of the future: Hydrogen storage methods. J. Energy Storage 2021, 40, 102676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110010231/downloads/20110010231.pdf (accessed on 22 January 2024).
- Available online: https://www.21-senses.com/fixed-hydrogen-leak-detector/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwk6SwBhDPARIsAJ59Gwdgp6iso-hNqZaORJapQlKZ91cTlhUJjM8ZfHNureMNzixdB5EGcdgaAm33EALw_wcB (accessed on 12 January 2024).
- Baroudi, U.; Al-Roubaiey, A.A.; Devendiran, A. Pipeline leak detection systems and data fusion: A survey. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 97426–97439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramaiyan, K.; Tsui, L.K.; Brosha, E.L.; Kreller, C.; Stetter, J.; Russ, T.; Du, W.; Peaslee, D.; Hunter, G.; Mukundan, R.; et al. Recent Developments in Sensor Technologies for Enabling the Hydrogen Economy. ECS Sens. Plus 2023, 2, 045601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdalla, T.A. Artificial neural network for the hydrogen detection using LPFBG. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2013, 7, 447–451. [Google Scholar]
- Kopbayev, A.; Khan, F.; Yang, M.; Halim, S.Z. Gas leakage detection using spatial and temporal neural network model. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 160, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, J.; Cong, H.; Ye, L.; Gao, W.; Bi, M. Hydrogen leakage location prediction at hydrogen refueling stations based on deep learning. Energy 2023, 284, 129361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, M.; Huang, T.; Liu, C.; Chen, M.; Ji, S.; Christopher, D.M.; Li, X. Leak localization using distributed sensors and machine learning for hydrogen releases from a fuel cell vehicle in a parking garage. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy 2021, 46, 1420–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, Y.; Nakayama, J.; Suzuki, T.; Soma, T.; Izato, Y.I.; Miyake, A. Machine learning model for detecting hydrogen leakage from hydrogen pipeline using physical modeling. In Proceedings of the PHM Society Asia-Pacific Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 11–14 September 2023; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, G.; Kong, D.; He, X.; Yu, X.; Jiang, K. Prediction of hydrogen leakage location and intensity in hydrogen refueling stations based on deep learning. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 68, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.; Kong, D.; Yu, X.; Ping, P.; Wang, G.; Peng, R.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, X. Prediction model for the evolution of hydrogen concentration under leakage in hydrogen refueling station using deep neural networks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 51, 702–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://eepower.com/tech-insights/researchers-create-optical-sensor-to-detect-hydrogen-leaks/ (accessed on 9 January 2024).
- El-Amin, M.F. Detection of Hydrogen Leakage Using Different Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 2023 20th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 26 January 2023; pp. 74–79. [Google Scholar]
- El-Amin, M.F.; Subasi, A. Forecasting a small-scale hydrogen leakage in air using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCIS), Sakaka, Saudi Arabia, 13–15 October 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Davoodi, S.; Thanh, H.V.; Wood, D.A.; Mehrad, M.; Al-Shargabi, M.; Rukavishnikov, V.S. Machine-learning models to predict hydrogen uptake of porous carbon materials from influential variables. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 316, 123807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, C.; Pei, W.; Jin, C.; Alizadeh, A.A.; Ghanbari, A. Prediction of the SnO2-based sensor response for hydrogen detection by artificial intelligence techniques. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 19834–19845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlotta, P. Machine Learning Approach for Hydrogen Safety in Confined Spaces: Forecasting Pressure Peaking Phenomenon. Master’s Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- El-Amin, M.F. Prediction of Hydrogen Leakage in Air Using Random Forest Technique. In Future of Information and Communication Conference; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 393–405. [Google Scholar]
- Quy, T.B.; Kim, J.M. Real-Time Leak Detection for a Gas Pipeline Using Ak-NN Classifier and Hybrid AE Features. Sensors 2021, 21, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Dong, Y.; Kang, J.; Paik, J.K. Quantitative Risk Assessment and Management of Hydrogen Leaks from Offshore Rocket Launching Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Symposium on System Security, Safety, and Reliability (ISSSR), Hangzhou, China, 10–11 June 2023; pp. 149–155. [Google Scholar]
- Dashdondov, K.; Song, M.H. Factorial Analysis for Gas Leakage Risk Predictions from a Vehicle-Based Methane Survey. Appl. Sci. 2021, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadin, M.S.; Ghazali, K.H. Gas leakage detection using thermal imaging technique. In Proceedings of the 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK, 26–28 March 2014; pp. 302–306. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.softwebsolutions.com/resources/leak-detection-system-using-computer-vision.html (accessed on 13 January 2024).
- Zhu, H.; Xie, W.; Li, J.; Shi, J.; Fu, M.; Qian, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, K.; Chen, G. Advanced computer vision-based subsea gas leaks monitoring: A comparison of two approaches. Sensors 2023, 23, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nooralishahi, P.; López, F.; Maldague, X. A Drone-Enabled Approach for Gas Leak Detection Using Optical Flow Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, G.; Makel, D.; Jansa, E.; Patterson, G.; Cova, P.; Liu, C.; Wu, Q.; Powers, W. A hydrogen leak detection system for aerospace and commercial applications. In Proceedings of the 31st Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, CA, USA, 10–12 July 1995; p. 2645. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20050169155/downloads/20050169155.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2024).
- Salhi, L.; Silverston, T.; Yamazaki, T.; Miyoshi, T. Early detection system for gas leakage and fire in smart home using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 11–13 January 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T.K.; Lin, Y.H.; Shen, J.Y. Developing and Implementing an AI-Based Leak Detection System in a Long-Distance Gas Pipeline. Adv. Technol. Innov. 2022, 7, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, K.; Correa-Jullian, C.; Thorson, J.; Groth, K.; Buttner, W. Hydrogen Component Leak Rate Quantification for System Risk and Reliability Assessment through QRA and PHM Frameworks; No. NREL/CP-5700-79598; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/articles/hydrogen-leak-detection-low-cost-distributed-gas-sensors (accessed on 22 January 2024).
- Available online: https://aramix.ai/en/blog/industrial-processes/ai-based-risk-analysis-for-hydrogen-fueled-transportation/ (accessed on 28 January 2024).
- Tian, Y.; Zou, Q.; Lin, Z. Hydrogen leakage diagnosis for proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems: Methods and suggestions on its application in fuel cell vehicles. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 224895–224910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Tchapmi, L.P.; Ravikumar, A.P.; McGuire, M.; Bell, C.S.; Zimmerle, D.; Savarese, S.; Brandt, A.R. Machine vision for natural gas methane emissions detection using an infrared camera. Appl. Energy 2020, 257, 113998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberson, L.B.; Williams, M.; Captain, J.E.; Mohajeri, N.; Raissi, A. Color Changing Hydrogen Sensors. In Proceedings of the NIAC Symposium (No. KSC-E-DAA-TN20536), Cocoa Beach, FL, USA, 27–29 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Mahmood, L.; Ghommem, M.; Bahroun, Z. Smart Gas Sensors: Materials, Technologies, Practical Applications, and Use of Machine Learning—A Review. J. Appl. Comput. Mech. 2023, 9, 775–803. [Google Scholar]
- Dash, A.; Bandopadhay, S.; Samal, S.R.; Poulkov, V. AI-Enabled IoT Framework for Leakage Detection and Its Consequence Prediction during External Transportation of LPG. Sensors 2023, 23, 6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.; Parashar, A.; Rai, C.; Pokhariyal, S. IoT Based Smart Gas Leakage Detection and Alert System. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Science & Technology (ICAST2021), Sion, Mumbai, 7 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Zainal, B.S.; Ker, P.J.; Mohamed, H.; Ong, H.C.; Fattah, I.; Rahman, S.A.; Nghiem, L.D.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folgado, F.J.; González, I.; Calderón, A.J. PEM Electrolyzer Digital Replica based on internal resistance determination applied to hydrogen energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2024, 75, 109694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamiery, A. Advancements in materials for hydrogen production: A review of cutting-edge technologies. ChemPhysMater 2023, 3, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Articles | Main Focus | Key Findings | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
Zhou et al. [9] | Impact of ignition height on explosion characteristics | Flame propagation velocity increases as ignition height decreases. Buoyancy effects intensify. | Understanding gas explosion dynamics |
Tarhan and Çil [10] | Examination of H2 energy production and utilization | Emphasized hydrogen’s potential as a low-carbon energy source. Explored storage technologies. | Energy production, transportation, storage |
Baker [11] | H2 Leak Detection Sensor Database | Technical specifications of various sensors provided. Enhanced understanding of sensor selection. | Leak detection, safety monitoring |
H2 IntelliSense Slim Hydrogen Sensor [12] | Innovative sensor technology for precise hydrogen detection | Broad sensing range, rapid response time, versatile applications across industries. | |
Baroudi et al. [13] | Evaluation of leak detection systems for pipeline safety | Importance of multiple LDSs for enhanced detection accuracy. Future directions involving ML and IoT. | Pipeline safety, environmental protection |
Ramaiyan et al. [14] | Overview of recent developments in hydrogen sensor technology | The crucial role of sensors in establishing a sustainable H2 economy. | Leak detection, process monitoring |
Articles | Main Focus | Key Findings | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
Hamdalla [15] | H2 detection using LPFBG and ANNs | Superior fitting to experimental data and efficient prediction of transmission power based on hydrogen concentration. | Rapid and effective H2 detection |
Alibek Kopbayev et al. [16] | Early detection and classification of gas leaks | High accuracy in predicting gas leakage and classifying its size using simulated concentration profiles. | Early detection and classification of natural gas leaks |
Bi et al. [17] | Precise H2 leakage localization | Proposed a hybrid CEEMDAN–CNN–LSTM model achieving exceptional prediction performance for H2 leakage localization in refueling stations. | Ensuring station safety through precise H2 leakage localization |
Zhao et al. [18] | Hydrogen leak localization using ML | Promising accuracy in predicting leak locations, with potential applications in real scenarios and early warning systems for leaks in confined spaces. | Prediction of H2 leak locations |
Suzuki et al. [19] | Distinguishing between leakage and non-leakage | Distinguished between non leakage and leakage behaviors in hydrogen pipelines using unsupervised ML, contributing to sensor optimization during the process design stage. | Identification of leakage points in H2 pipelines |
He [21] | Predicting hydrogen leak consequences | Introduced a physics-informed ConvLSTM network for swift prediction of hydrogen concentration distribution following leakages, offering real-time risk warnings and improved computational efficiency. | Real-time prediction of H2 leak consequences for risk management at hydrogen refueling stations |
Swedish and Dutch researchers [22] | AI-enabled optical sensor for hydrogen detection | Developed an AI-enabled optical sensor capable of detecting low levels of H2 with unprecedented sensitivity and enhanced safety in various sectors, including transportation and energy. | Detection of low levels of hydrogen for safety applications |
WD-KNN-CNN Model [20] | Predicting hydrogen leakage location and intensity | Achieved high prediction accuracies of 99.14% for leak location and 97.42% for intensity level using wavelet denoising for data preprocessing and Bayesian optimization for hyperparameter optimization. Effectively captures temporal concentration information, enabling millisecond-level predictions, and addresses issues of delayed access to leak source information. | Provides a decision-making basis for on-site personnel to manage leakages in HRS. |
Articles | Machine Learning Techniques | Key Findings | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
El-Amin [23] | ANN, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Decision Trees | Random Forest outperforms in predicting H2 dispersion. Dataset preparation and hyperparameter adjustments. | Mitigating safety risks associated with hydrogen leaks. |
El-Amin et al. [24] | Linear Regression, ANN, SVM, k-NN, Random Forest | Random Forest excels in forecasting hydrogen concentration. Trained model helps in leak prediction. | Understanding and predicting hydrogen leakage scenarios. |
Davoodi et al. [25] | GRNN (Recurrent Neural Network), LSSVM, ANFIS, ELM | LSSVM model demonstrates high accuracy in predicting PCM H2-uptake. Pressure identified as influential variable. | Optimizing H2 storage systems. |
Shi et al. [26] | GEP, Support Vector Regression, ANN | MLPNN exhibits high accuracy in estimating HDR for SnO2-based sensors. Mathematical models for HDR calculation. | Automating hydrogen sensing for nanocomposites. |
Safety and Risk Management [27] | ML Models from HyTunnel project | Successful forecasting of physical phenomena during indoor H2 releases. Analyzing large datasets for safety improvement. | Enhancing safety measures in H2 handling. |
El-Amin et al. [28] | Random Forest | RF accurately predicts H2 concentration distribution. Feature importance and hyperparameter tuning highlighted. | Analyzing turbulent buoyant jets for safety implications of hydrogen leakage. |
Quy et al. [29] | k-NN | Real-time gas pipeline leak detection system demonstrates high classification accuracy. Feature exploration enhances performance. | Ensuring safety in real-world gas pipeline networks. |
Kong et al. [30] | LSTM, Latin Hypercube Sampling, CFD | Quantitative risk assessment of liquid hydrogen leaks achieved using LSTM network. Proposed methodology meets ALARP criteria. | Predicting hazards during the filling process in offshore rocket launching platforms. |
Dashdondov et al. [31] | XGBoost, KNN, DT, RF, NB, MLP | F-OE-XGBoost algorithm achieves high accuracy i.e., 95.14%, 95.75% F1-score, 0.028 MSE, and a 96.29% AUC) in predicting natural gas leakage levels. Success attributed to feature selection and clustering. | Early prediction of NG leakage levels and addressing concerns in urban NG distribution. |
Approach | Articles | Key Features | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
Infrared Image Analysis for Gas Leak Detection | Jadin et al. [32] | - Thermal imaging technology - Image filtering and segmentation - Classification of normal and abnormal conditions | - Industrial scenarios - Timely warnings for maintenance needs |
AI-powered Leak Detection System | Softweb Solutions [33] | - Utilization of CV techniques - Integration of bidirectional CNNs - Data-driven approach for enhanced accuracy | - Real-time leak detection - Customization and remote access - Identification of small pipeline leaks |
CV-Based Monitoring Approach | Zhu et al. [34] | - Adoption of faster R-CNN and YOLOv4 models with 1280 × 720 image size and no noise - Mathematical support for model performance | - Automatic and real-time detection of underwater leaks - Classification and location of gas plumes |
Development of Gas Imaging Technologies | Nooralishahi et al. [35] | - Drone-enabled gas leak detection technique - Video stabilization and optical flow analysis | - Early detection of hazardous gas leaks - Gas flow visualization and detection |
Approach | Articles | Key Features | Applications |
---|---|---|---|
Hydrogen leak detection system for space shuttle | NASA Lewis Research Center, GenCorp Aerojet, Case Western Reserve University [36] | - Microfabricated hydrogen sensors developed for space shuttle applications | - Rapid, multipoint leak monitoring crucial for safety - Applications extend to diverse environments - Commercial system developed for the automotive industry detecting low hydrogen concentrations |
Gencorp Aerojet automated hydrogen gas leak detection system | Gencorp Aerojet [37] | - Utilized palladium/Silver (PdAg) solid-state hydrogen sensors - Detects hydrogen concentrations from 1 to 4000 ppm - Allows operation of up to 128 sensors – Provides real-time data on leaks in pressurized systems | - Safety and quality control in industrial settings - Monitoring inert and combustible hydrogen mixtures - Adopted by Ford Motor Company for natural gas vehicle assembly lines |
Integration of gas leakage and fire detection systems | Salhi et al. [38] | - Integrates gas leakage and fire detection systems into a centralized Machine-to-Machine (M2M) network—Utilizes low-cost devices and ML for early prediction of risk incidents based on abnormal air state changes | - Enhancing safety in smart homes - Predicting danger levels in real-time |
AI-based gas leak detection model for long-distance pipelines | Wang et al. [39] | - Utilizes CNNs for gas leak detection in long-distance pipelines - Effective detection without additional hardware requirements | - Detection of leaks in real transmission pipeline systems—Potential for applications in various industrial sectors |
Collaborative efforts to enhance reliability and safety of hydrogen systems | Hartmann et al. [40] | - Quantitative data analysis of component leaks and failures using Prognosis and Health Management (PHM) and quantitative risk assessment (QRA) - Measurement of hydrogen leak rates with the leak rate quantification apparatus (LRQA) | - Improving system reliability and safety of hydrogen infrastructure - Supporting standards development for hydrogen technology |
Breakthrough in hydrogen leak detection using low-cost distributed gas sensors | Element One, Inc. [41] | - Utilizes smart coatings with chemochromic materials for hydrogen leak detection - Offers cost-effective solutions for various applications - Provides current and historical leak information | - Industrial settings—Wireless sensor networks - Fuel cells, medical diagnostics, and environmental testing |
AI-based risk analysis for hydrogen-fueled transportation | Aramix [42] | - Integrates traditional analysis methods with AI models for comprehensive risk analysis - Provides quantitative analysis and probabilistic information | - Ensuring safety throughout the hydrogen value chain in transportation - Optimizing planning and decision-making in logistics |
Hydrogen leakage diagnosis methods for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) vehicles | Tian et al. [43] | - Recommends a combination of environmental hydrogen concentration, pressure decay, and model-based or data-driven methods for leakage diagnosis - Emphasizes the role of environmental hydrogen concentration and advanced diagnosis methods | - Diagnosis of hydrogen leakage in PEMFC vehicles - Ensuring safety in hydrogen-powered vehicles |
CV approach for automating methane leak detection | Wang et al. [44] | - Introduces GasNet, a CNN-based CV approach for methane leak detection using Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) - Achieves high detection accuracy and excels at identifying large leaks in close proximity | - Automating methane leak detection - Environmental protection by addressing natural gas methane emissions |
Chemochromic detector for H2 gas leaks during space shuttle fueling | Roberson et al. [45] | - Uses chemochromic pigments and polymer matrix for detecting and locating hydrogen leaks - Environmentally friendly and temperature-stable—Versatile applications in paint, tape, textiles, and Space Shuttle fueling | - Enhancing safety in hydrogen operations - Detection and localization of hydrogen leaks without power requirements |
Integration of gas sensor arrays (GSAs) with ML in electronic nose (E-nose) systems | Mahmood et al. [46] | - Reviews gas sensor arrays (GSAs) integrated with ML in electronic nose (E-nose) systems - Discusses fabrication technologies, operational frameworks, and signal preprocessing techniques - Addresses challenges and offers recommendations for future development | - Gas type determination and concentration estimation in various applications - Continuous real-time monitoring in medical, industrial, and environmental settings |
AI-enabled IoT solution for disaster management in transporting hazardous substances | Dash et al. [47] | - Proposes an AI model for predicting consequences based on risk contours’ diameter - Deploys at the edge of the IoT network for gas leakage detection during transportation - Prototype tested successfully at an LPG bottling plant | - Disaster management in transporting hazardous substances - Early detection and notification of gas leaks |
Arduino-based system for gas leak detection | Parashar et al. [48] | - Utilizes an MQ6 gas sensor for detecting gas leaks in diverse settings - Automatically initiates precautionary measures upon detection - Enhanced with a Wi-Fi module for prompt user notification via SMS | - Preventing accidents and mitigating risks associated with gas leaks - Proactive measures for safety in various environments |
Aspect | Approach | Challenges | Research Gaps | Opportunities for Further Research and Development |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional methods | Experimental methods, such as investigating ignition height dynamics, evaluating sensor technologies, and comparing leak detection systems. | - Limited scalability and applicability of experimental findings. - Difficulty in replicating real-world conditions in experiments. - Lack of standardization in experimental setups and methodologies. | - Standardization of experimental protocols and datasets. - Integration of experimental findings with computational models for comprehensive analysis. | - Development of advanced experimental setups to mimic real-world scenarios more accurately. - Collaboration between researchers and industry for standardized testing and validation. |
Modeling with artificial neural networks | Deployment of ANNs for rapid and accurate H2 detection, leak localization, risk analysis, and IoT solutions. | - Data scarcity and quality issues affecting model performance. - Complexity in optimizing models for diverse environmental conditions. - Interpretability and transparency of AI-driven decisions. - Overfitting and generalization challenges, especially for complex systems. - Computational complexity and resource requirements for training and inference. | - Development of standardized datasets and benchmarks for evaluating AI models. - Exploration of explainable AI techniques to enhance transparency and trust in AI-driven systems. - Exploration of transfer learning and semi-supervised techniques to mitigate data scarcity issues. - Development of lightweight ANN architectures for efficient deployment in resource-constrained environments. | - Integration of AI with sensor networks for real-time monitoring and response. - Investigation of federated learning approaches for collaborative model training without sharing sensitive data. - Investigation of hybrid models combining physics-based and data-driven approaches for improved accuracy and robustness. - Deployment of edge computing solutions for real-time ANN inference in IoT devices. |
Machine learning applications | Utilization of ML algorithms such as SVM, random forest, etc. for various applications in hydrogen safety, including dispersion prediction and leak detection. | - Model interpretability and explainability, especially for complex advanced ML models. - Bias and fairness concerns in dataset collection and model training. - Limited transferability of models across different environmental conditions. | - Development of interpretable ML models with transparent decision-making processes. - Exploration of adversarial robustness techniques to enhance model fairness and reliability. | - Investigation of multitasking and transfer learning approaches to improve model generalization across diverse environmental conditions. - Integration of human-in-the-loop methodologies for bias detection and mitigation. |
Vision-based detection techniques | Application of CV techniques such as CNNs for automated leak detection and monitoring using image analysis. | - Limited availability of high-quality and annotated datasets for training leak detection models. - Challenges in adapting CV techniques to different lighting and environmental conditions. Real-time processing and inference constraints for embedded systems. | - Creation of large-scale annotated datasets specific to hydrogen leak detection scenarios. - Optimization of CV algorithms for real-time performance in resource-constrained environments. | - Development of novel sensor fusion techniques combining CV with other sensing modalities for improved leak detection accuracy. - Exploration of edge-based processing and inference solutions for real-time leak detection in IoT devices. |
Real-world implementations | Demonstration of practical applications, including hydrogen leak detection systems, IoT solutions, and integration with fire detection systems for real-world safety. | - Integration and interoperability challenges when deploying safety systems in complex environments. - Scalability and cost considerations for widespread deployment. - User acceptance and adoption of AI-driven safety solutions. | - Development of interoperability standards and protocols for seamless integration of safety systems. - Cost reduction strategies for making safety technologies more accessible and affordable. | - Deployment of AI-driven safety systems in smart cities and industrial environments for comprehensive risk mitigation. - Collaboration with regulatory bodies and industry partners to establish safety standards and guidelines. - Continuous monitoring and evaluation of safety solutions for performance optimization |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Patil, R.R.; Calay, R.K.; Mustafa, M.Y.; Thakur, S. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Hydrogen Safety. Hydrogen 2024, 5, 312-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5020018
Patil RR, Calay RK, Mustafa MY, Thakur S. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Hydrogen Safety. Hydrogen. 2024; 5(2):312-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5020018
Chicago/Turabian StylePatil, Ravindra R., Rajnish Kaur Calay, Mohamad Y. Mustafa, and Somil Thakur. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Hydrogen Safety" Hydrogen 5, no. 2: 312-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5020018
APA StylePatil, R. R., Calay, R. K., Mustafa, M. Y., & Thakur, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Innovations in Hydrogen Safety. Hydrogen, 5(2), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen5020018