Next Article in Journal
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index Determination in Urban Areas by Full-Spectrum Photography
Previous Article in Journal
Are Spine-Bearing Freshwater Gastropods Better Defended?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Asexual Regeneration Response of Ilex canariensis Poir. to Management of the Canopy of Pinus radiata D.Don

by
José Ramón Arévalo
Department of Botany, Ecology and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de La Laguna, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Ecologies 2020, 1(1), 14-21; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies1010003
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 26 October 2020 / Published: 27 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regeneration Strategies of Forest Species)

Abstract

:
Exotic afforestation can provide suitable conditions for native shade-tolerant species restoration without threatening native forests. This study analyzes the impact of different thinning intensities of the canopy of an exotic Pinus radiata stand on the asexual regeneration response of Ilex canariensis, a native laurel forest species in the Canary Islands, Spain. The results provide useful indications for how to manage P. radiata stands to promote recovery of native plant communities. For different stand treatments were selected: stand clear cut, low intensity thinning (10–15%), high intensity thinning (25%), and a control. The stand clear cut management revealed Ilex canariensis individuals with a higher number of sprouts and more leaf cover; however, the height of these sprouts two years after the cut did not reach the values of individuals prior to this management. Consequently, the vitality index following clear cut management is significantly lower with respect to the other treatments. Thinning management is shown not to be so useful to promote the growth and vitality of Ilex canariensis individuals. The results suggest that thinning over 50% could be more appropriate in the case of Pinus radiata, allowing resprouting of Ilex canariensis in the understory and improvement in the vitality index.

1. Introduction

Reintroduction of natural vegetation in areas reforested with exotic species and improvement in the plant community is considered restoration [1]. Afforestation with exotic species can have both negative and positive effects on the environment [2], such as increasing water demand and, on the other hand, protection from soil erosion. Exotic afforestation can also provide the right conditions for the establishment of native shade-tolerant species without threatening native forests, which have proven resilient to invasion by exotic species [3]. Indeed, several studies show that plantations of exotic species have facilitated forest succession in their understories at sites where disturbances have prevented recolonization by native forest species [4,5,6]. These are considered as facilitative or positive interactions in which encounters between organisms benefit at least one of the participants and cause harm to neither [7]. To generate management proposals for exotic plantations, the World Bank, the Institute for Tropical Forestry (USDA Forest Service), and the British Overseas Development Authority (ODA) initiated a global research network in 1994 to evaluate the role of such plantations in rehabilitating native forests [8].
Many of the afforestation plans for the Canary Islands, Spain, have been carried out with native species with the objective of restoring vegetation disturbed or removed during the previous five centuries following the European colonization of the islands [9]. However, some stands were reforested with the exotic species, Pinus radiata D.Don, instead of the endemic one, Pinus canariensis.
In recent years, conservation managers have reconsidered the use of the plantations, moving away from the idea of using them solely as exploitable natural resources and toward managing them to restore the natural pine forest or the Macaronesian endemic laurel forest. The latter has been greatly disturbed and reduced to 10% of its potential area. Unfortunately, little information is available on pine forest dynamics, and the few quantitative studies there are deal specifically with fire effects [10,11,12]. Management of these exotic species and their eradication is one of the main aims of forest management programs of the Government of the Canary Islands, requiring ecological restoration studies to orientate this management.
The Macaronesian laurel forest is a subtropical forest, which is characteristic of some of the Macaronesian archipelagos (the Canary Islands, Madeira, and the Azores). Ilex canariensis (a native tree of the laurel forest) grows under the canopy, and its development and response to canopy treatments of Pinus radiata can be an indicator of the progress of laurel forest restoration. Under the canopy, I. canariensis regenerates mainly asexually by basal sprouts, but in open areas or forest borders, sexual regeneration is also common [13]. Forests cover roughly 25% of the Tenerife island land area and provide vital environmental services such as climate regulation, soil protection, and water management. Forest restoration should be implemented in order to increased or maintain this basic ecological process.
Therefore, the main objective of this study is to analyze the impact of different thinning intensities on the P. radiata stand on the asexual response of Ilex canariensis as a management indicator to promote the establishment of native plant communities. In this case, our hypotheses are first that Ilex canariensis increases its vitality, the more intense the thinning, and second, that basal sprouts and growth increase in relation to thinning intensity. An additional aim is to generate proposals to manage the forest following the approach of landscape silviculture and stand manipulation to avoid and/or recover the stand from natural or anthropogenic disturbances [14].

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Site

The study was carried out on the north east slope of the Corona Forestal Natural Park and Reserva Especial de las Palomas, in Tenerife (28°19’ N, 16°34’ W), Canary Islands at approximately 1000 m a.s.l. (Figure 1). The park is c.a. 50,000 ha, and around 25% of the park has been reforested with Pinus canariensis (except 2% in which Pinus radiata was planted). The bulk of the reforestation was conducted in 1930–1940 [15]. The sites selected for this study were planted in 1948–1952 (Figure 1). The study site and all the plots are located in similar areas with low environmental variability. Moreover, the characteristics of the stand presented low variation.
Potential natural vegetation is represented by laurel forest vegetation with dominant species such as Prunus lusitanica, Ilex perado, Ilex canariensis, Persea indica, Laurus novocanariensis, and Visnea mocanera (Lauro azoricae-Perseo indicae sigmetum association) [16]. The dominant shrub species differ between stands. A high number of annual and ruderal species is present at both sites, especially in the plots close to trails or those affected by other disturbances [17].
The annual precipitation of the park reaches 900 mm but can be twice this amount if fog drip is considered [18], with an irregular pattern, although rain is more common during winter. The mean annual temperature is around 15 degrees centigrade with minimal annual and daily fluctuations. Frost events may occur a few days a year at high altitudes. Soils at the study site have been classified in the order Entisol, suborder Orthens [19]. Nomenclature follows Acebes et al. 2004 [20].

2.2. Design of the Experiment

An area of 200 ha was managed for restoration in 2010. The density of Pinus radiata in this area was approximately of 700–800 ind/ha without any treatment [21], but some areas of the stands managed were reduced by 15% in density (hereafter “LI” for low intensity thinning) and another underwent more intense management with 25% reduction of density (hereafter “HI” for high intensity thinning). The planting of P. radiata was carried out 73 years ago. There were approximately 60 and 80 ha, respectively. Additionally, near this area, due to a major storm that took place a few months before management activities started, causing a high amount of damage to trees, all of these trees were removed over approximately 10 ha (hereafter “SC” for stand clear cut). Finally, there was an area without any treatment of management, which is considered the control (hereafter “CON”). The regeneration of P. radiata is very low in these plantations, and does not reveal invasive characteristics as for other species of Pinus.
Two points were randomly selected (separated approx. by 100 m) in the middle of the different stand management categories (LI, HI, and CON) except for SC, where only one was chosen. After establishing the plot, I measured altitude, aspect, and slope, and estimated canopy cover of the stand using a convex spherical crown densitometer (measuring four points around the center point A,B,C,D) [22]. At each point and using polar coordinates, information on the closest 20 individuals (or live coppice) of Ilex canariensis was used for measuring characteristics. All the plots were sampled two years after management.
For each individual, data on number of sprouts, measured mean height of the sprouts, maximum height, and estimated number of leaves were collected (using the following scale: class 1: 1–2 leaves, 2: >1% of cover of all the branches, 3: 1–2%, 4: 2–5%, 5: 5–10%, 6: 10–25%, 7: 25–50%, 8: 50–75%, 9: >75% cover of the total). For all individuals, maximum height and two diameters (the larger one and its perpendicular from the canopy) from the top of the plant were measured, from which each individual’s total biovolume was calculated, including all the sprouts. The biovolume multiplied by the leaf cover based on visual estimation was used as a vitality index.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All of the different variables (number of sprouts, average height, maximum height, estimated cover of leaves, biovolume, and vitality index; considered the dependent variables) of the plots under different managements (HI, LI, SC, and CON; the independent factors) were compared individually using a two-way distance-based permutational repeated measures ANOVA, and the plots were applied as paired factors. Analysis was based on Bray–Curtis distances of raw data, with p-values obtained by using 9999 permutations of the appropriate exchangeable units [23]. Pairwise posteriori comparisons using t-statistics were applied when PERMANOVA revealed significant differences among groups (for p < 0.05).

3. Results

The altitude of plots ranged between 960 and 1150 m a.s.l. and the canopy cover varied between 75 and 90%, with the control plots presenting higher values, as expected. The other environmental variables also presented low variability (Table 1). Basal area and density before management remained at similar values in all the stands where the plots were located (with an average of 55–67 m2/ha and 700,800 ind/ha based on previous studies; [19]).
The number of basal sprouts presented significant differences (PseudoF6,13 = 10.95, p < 0.001), but pairwise analysis revealed that only the SC plot differed from the rest, with average values over five sprouts (Figure 2a). The estimated number of leaves also presented significant differences, with higher values in the SC plots and non-regular patterns among the others (PseudoF6,13 = 39.11, p < 0.001; Figure 2b). The average height of the sprouts revealed significant differences with higher values for HI and LI with respect to SC and CON (PseudoF6,13 = 18.13, p < 0.001; Figure 2c). In the case of maximum sprout height, higher significant values were presented in HI and LI (PseudoF6,13 = 9.68, p < 0.001; Figure 2d).
For biovolume and the vitality index, the results followed a similar pattern, with higher values of biovolume and index for HI and LI treatments (PseudoF6,13 = 13.50, p < 0.001 and PseudoF6,13 = 5.98, p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 3a,b).

4. Discussion

The main objective of this study is to develop the best management practices to promote and restore the native plant community based on the response to treatments of a Pinus radiata canopy of one of the dominant native species, Ilex canariensis. As the exotic canopy has produced a nursery effect, it is considered an important driving force of plant community succession and/or vegetation restoration [24] and facilitates the recovery of native vegetation [8]. However, native species development after 60–70 years has been interrupted by the presence of the canopy of other exotic species. Using Ilex canariensis as an indicator of the recovery of the understory, the most appropriate management can be selected. Asexual regeneration increases the occupancy rate of the spaces produced by the forest management and could help to restore part of the 90% of the laurel forest that has been lost over the last 500 years [25].
The SC management revealed that the measured individuals presented a larger number of sprouts and more leaf cover. However, the height of these sprouts 2 years after the cut did not reached the values of the individuals prior to this management. Consequently, the vitality index is significantly lower with respect to the other treatments, except for the control plot (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Although the CON management presents lower values of sprouts and height of the sprouts, these were non-significant with respect to the values of LI and HI. Thus, the thinning management has not been very useful in promoting the regeneration of species growing in the understory, or as a regenerative tool of the canopy. In the case of other studies on the native pine in the Canary Islands, Pinus canariensis [24,26], in order to produce significant results through thinning, canopy openness should be much greater than that provided by the management practices (25 and 50% of density), requiring at least >50% open canopy for a few years to favor establishment (it should be ensured that trees around the gaps are unable to close the canopy with their branches). This fact is supported by the low differences that CON, HI, and LI present with respect to canopy cover, because of the fast closing of the canopy with branches of surrounding individuals.
In this case, we can speculate that thinning over 50% could be more appropriate in the case of Pinus radiata, allowing resprouting of Ilex canariensis in the understory, and also the improvement of the vitality index. This technique cannot be extrapolated in the case of Pinus canariensis, as this species is able to resprout and will reach the canopy faster than other species of the understory.
The laurel forest of the Canary Islands is the most emblematic vegetation type of the Canary Island archipelago. Thus, restoration programs are being developed to increase laurel forest area on islands such as Tenerife. Today, less than 10% of the original laurel forest on Tenerife remains at a good conservation level [27].

5. Conclusions

Based on these results, I can suggest the maintenance of the Pinus radiata stand in the present conditions in the studied area. This nursery effect of the canopy of P. radiata can be seen at different levels (increases in soil humidity, organic matter, provision of benign habitats, or more favorable conditions for germination [28,29,30]), but management will be necessary in order to enhance the recovery of the natural laurel forest, as is revealed in the studied Ilex canariensis as an indicator species and the low development of leaves or poor growth after management. Canopy opening over the levels analyzed in this study will be required in order to succeed in reverting an exotic canopy to the natural laurel forest.
These findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions should be aimed at promoting increased regeneration of the laurel forest.

Funding

This study was funded by the Cabildo Insular de Tenerife.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the “Cabildo Insular de Tenerife” and its “Sección de Biodiversidad” for the support and permits to carry out this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Palmer, M.A.; Zedler, J.B.; Falk, D.A. Foundations of Restoration Ecology; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arévalo, J.R.; Delgado, J.D.; Fernández-Palacios, J.M. Regeneration of potential laurel forest under a native canopy and an exotic canopy, Tenerife (Canary Islands). For. Syst. 2011, 20, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Geldenhuys, C.J. The Blakwood Group system, its relevance for sustainable forest management in the southern Cape. S. Afr. For. J. 1996, 178, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Parrotta, J.A. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. J. Veg. Sci. 1995, 6, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fimbel, A.R.; Fimbel, C.C. The role of exotic conifer plantations in rehabilitating degraded tropical forest lands, i.c. A case study from the Kivale Forest in Uganda. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 81, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loumeto, J.J.; Huttel, C. Understory vegetation in fast growing tree plantations on savanna soils in Congo. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 99, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bruno, J.F.; Stachowicz, J.J.; Bertness, M.D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2003, 18, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parrotta, J.A.; Turnbull, J.W.; Jones, N. Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 99, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Nascimento, L.; Willis, K.J.; Fernández-Palacios, J.M.; Criado, C.; Whittaker, R.J. The long-term ecology of the lost forests of La Laguna, Tenerife (Canary Islands). J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Höllermann, P. The impact of fire in Canarian ecosystems 1983–1998. Erdkunde 2000, 54, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arévalo, J.R.; Fernández-Palacios, J.M.; Jiménez, M.J.; Gil, P. The effect of fire intensity on the understory species composition of two Pinus canariensis reforested stands in Tenerife (Canary Islands). For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 148, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Arévalo, J.R.; Naranjo-Cigala, A. Wildfire impact and the FIRE PARADOX in a natural and endemic pine forest stand and shrubland. Fire 2018, 1, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Fernández-Palacios, J.M.; Arévalo, J.R.; González-Delgado, G.; Delgado, J.D.; Otto, R. Estrategias de regeneración en la laurisilva. Makaronesia 2004, 6, 90–101. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pretzsch, H. Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Del Arco, M.J.; Wildpret, W.; Pérez de Paz, P.L.; Rodríguez-Delgado, O.; Acebes, J.R.; García-Gallo, A.; Martín, V.E.; Reyes-Betancort, J.A.; Salas, M.; Bermejo, J.A.; et al. Mapa de Vegetación de Canarias; GRAFCAN: Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. Del Arco, M.J.; Pérez de Paz, P.L.; Salas, M.; Wildpret, W. Atlas Cartográfico de los Pinares Canaries: II Tenerife; Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente: Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ceballos, L.; Ortuño, F. Vegetación y Flora Forestal de las Islas Occidentales, 2nd ed.; Cabildo Insular de Tenerife: S/C de Tenerife, Spain, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kämmer, F. Klima und Vegetation auf Tenerife, besonders in Hinblick auf den Nebelniederschlag. Scripta Geobot. 1974, 7, 1–78. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernández-Caldas, E.; Tejedor, M.; Quantin, P. Los Suelos Volcánicos de Canarias; Servicio de Publicaciones de La Universidad de La Laguna: La Laguna, Spain, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  20. Acebes, J.R.; del Arco, M.; García, A.; León, M.C.; Pérez de Paz, P.L.; Rodríguez, O.; Wildpret, W.; Martín, V.E.; Marrero, M.C.; Rodríguez, L. Pteridophyta, Spermatophyta. In Lista de Especies Silvestres de Canarias (Hongos, Plantas y Animales Terrestres); Izquierdo, I., Martín, J.L., Zurita, N., Arechavaleta, M., Eds.; Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación Territorial, Gobierno de Canarias: S/C de Tenerife, Spain, 2004; pp. 96–143. [Google Scholar]
  21. Arévalo, J.R.; García, G.; Montes de Oca, Y.; Fernández, S. Differences in Carbon Sequestration in Native vs. Exotic Pine Species (Tenerife, Canary Islands). Bull. UASVM Ser. Agric. 2013, 70, 299–303. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemmon, P.E. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density. J. For. 1957, 55, 667–668. [Google Scholar]
  23. Anderson, M.; Gorley, R.N.; Clarke, R.K. Permanova+ for Primer: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods; PRIMER-E: Plymouth, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ren, H.; Long, Y.; Nan, L. Nurse plant theory and its application in ecological restoration in lower subtropics of China. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2008, 18, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernández-Palacios, J.M.; Arévalo, J.R.; Balguerías, E.; Barone, R.; De Nascimento, L.; Elias, R.B.; Delgado, J.D.; Fernández-Lugo, S.; Méndez, J.; Menezes de Sequeira, M.; et al. La Laurisilva. Canarias, Madeira y Azores; Editorial Macaronesia: SC de Tenerife, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arévalo, J.R.; Fernández-Palacios, J.M. Natural regeneration of Pinus canariensis Chr. Sm. ex DC in Buch in forest plantations after thinning. Open For. Sci. J. 2008, 1, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santos, A. Bosques de Laurisilva en la Región Macaronésica; Colección Naturaleza y Medio ambiente, 49; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  28. Onaindia, M.; Mitxelena, A. Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin. Ann. For. Sci. 2009, 66, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Adam, F.S.; Norton, D.A.; Carswell, F.E. Artificial canopy gaps accelerate restoration within an exotic Pinus radiata plantation. Restor. Ecol. 2016, 24, 336–345. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lameira, L.L.; Ferreira, F.C.; Esteves, R.A.; Queiroz, J. Plant-canopy Effects on Natural Regeneration in Sites Under Restoration: Do Tree Species Matter? Floresta Ambiente 2019, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Map of the Canary Islands, indicating Corona Forestal Natural Park in Tenerife island. (b) Tenerife island: Darker marked areas of the park indicate the Pinus radiata stands.
Figure 1. (a) Map of the Canary Islands, indicating Corona Forestal Natural Park in Tenerife island. (b) Tenerife island: Darker marked areas of the park indicate the Pinus radiata stands.
Ecologies 01 00003 g001
Figure 2. Mean values and standard deviations of the 20 individuals in each plot. (a) Average number of sprouts (meters); (b) leaf cover estimation; (c) average height of sprouts (meters); (d) maximum height of sprouts (meters). Identical letters above the bars indicate non-significant differences.
Figure 2. Mean values and standard deviations of the 20 individuals in each plot. (a) Average number of sprouts (meters); (b) leaf cover estimation; (c) average height of sprouts (meters); (d) maximum height of sprouts (meters). Identical letters above the bars indicate non-significant differences.
Ecologies 01 00003 g002
Figure 3. Mean values and standard deviations of the 20 individuals in each plot (a) Average biovolume of the individuals (m3); (b) vitality index average. Identical letters above the bars indicate non-significant differences.
Figure 3. Mean values and standard deviations of the 20 individuals in each plot (a) Average biovolume of the individuals (m3); (b) vitality index average. Identical letters above the bars indicate non-significant differences.
Ecologies 01 00003 g003
Table 1. Environmental characteristics of the different plots of the study.
Table 1. Environmental characteristics of the different plots of the study.
PlotTreatmentSlope (°)AspectAltitude (m)ABCDAvg.
CON1Control25N11009080858585
CON2Control12NO10458585809085
LI1Low Intensity8N9207065707570
LI2Low Intensity10N9106580757574
HI1High Intensity10NO9508080808580
HI2High Intensity10NO9607075757072
SCStand Clear Cut10NO1090
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arévalo, J.R. Asexual Regeneration Response of Ilex canariensis Poir. to Management of the Canopy of Pinus radiata D.Don. Ecologies 2020, 1, 14-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies1010003

AMA Style

Arévalo JR. Asexual Regeneration Response of Ilex canariensis Poir. to Management of the Canopy of Pinus radiata D.Don. Ecologies. 2020; 1(1):14-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies1010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arévalo, José Ramón. 2020. "Asexual Regeneration Response of Ilex canariensis Poir. to Management of the Canopy of Pinus radiata D.Don" Ecologies 1, no. 1: 14-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies1010003

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop