Next Article in Journal
Autophagy–Proteasome Crosstalk in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Cellular Proteostasis, Neural Interactions, and Therapeutic Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction, Purification and Current Status of Biocompatibility Applications of Fish Collagen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

β Alanine Modulates the Activity and Stability of Peroxiredoxin 6: A Biochemical and Mechanistic Study

by
Anju Kumari
1,
Kuldeep Singh
1,
Seemasundari Yumlembam
2,
Hamidur Rahaman
3,
Mohd Saquib Ansari
4 and
Laishram Rajendrakumar Singh
1,*
1
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Center for Biomedical Research, University of Delhi, Delhi 110021, India
2
Department of Life Science, Manipur University, Imphal 795003, India
3
Department of Biotechnology, Manipur University, Imphal 795003, India
4
Department of Biomedical Science, Shaheed Rajguru College of Applied Sciences for Women, Vasundhara Enclave, Delhi 110096, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biophysica 2026, 6(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica6010011
Submission received: 14 October 2025 / Revised: 25 January 2026 / Accepted: 30 January 2026 / Published: 5 February 2026

Abstract

Peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6) is a bifunctional antioxidant enzyme with glutathione peroxidase and phospholipase A2 activities that plays an essential role in cellular redox regulation. However, the modulation of Prdx6 activity by endogenous small metabolites remains poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the effect of β alanine on Prdx6 structure and function using biochemical, biophysical, computational, and cellular approaches. Enzymatic assays revealed that β alanine enhances the peroxidase activity of Prdx6 in a dose-dependent manner. Spectroscopic analyses demonstrated β alanine-induced conformational stabilization of Prdx6, which was further supported by increased thermal stability. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations identified a stable interaction of β alanine at a distinct allosteric site on Prdx6, accompanied by reduced local flexibility. In a proof-of-concept cellular system, β alanine treatment resulted in a significant reduction in intracellular reactive oxygen species, consistent with enhanced Prdx6-associated antioxidant activity. Collectively, these findings identify β alanine as a biochemical modulator of Prdx6 activity. The study is limited to mechanistic and cellular redox regulation and does not address tissue- or disease-specific physiology.

1. Introduction

Maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis is essential for preserving protein function and preventing oxidative damage under both physiological and stress conditions. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are continuously generated as by-products of cellular metabolism and play important roles in redox signaling; however, excessive ROS accumulation can lead to oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. Cells therefore rely on a tightly regulated antioxidant defense system to maintain redox balance. To mitigate oxidative damage, cells harness an array of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidases, and the peroxiredoxin family (Prdx1-6) [1]. Of these, Peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6), the sole mammalian 1-Cys peroxiredoxin, uniquely utilizes glutathione rather than thioredoxin to restore its active form [2,3]. Prdx6 stands out due to its bifunctional capabilities: it not only reduces hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides via glutathione peroxidase activity, but also repairs oxidized membrane phospholipids through phospholipase A2 activity, making it a multifunctional protector against oxidative injury [3,4,5,6]. The peroxidase function resides at a catalytic triad including Cys47, His39, and Arg132, enabling it to reduce oxidized phospholipid fatty acyl chains and protect membranes from oxidative damage. The PLA2 activity, governed by Ser32, His26, and Asp140, facilitates phospholipid hydrolysis, lipid remodeling, and surfactant metabolism, especially prominent under acidic conditions or upon phosphorylation [7,8]. These dual roles position Prdx6 at the crossroads of antioxidant defense and phospholipid homeostasis, making it essential for maintaining cellular integrity. Given its broad antioxidant function, Prdx6 has been studied in multiple physiological and pathological contexts, including inflammation, cancer biology, neurodegeneration, metabolic disorders, and aging-related oxidative stress. Experimental evidence from genetic, biochemical, and cellular models indicates that perturbations in Prdx6 expression or activity can lead to elevated oxidative stress, altered redox signaling pathways, and compromised cellular homeostasis. Despite these observations, most existing studies focus on phenotypic or tissue-level outcomes and do not elucidate the molecular mechanisms that regulate Prdx6 activity at the protein level. In particular, the role of endogenous small metabolites in modulating Prdx6 structure, stability, and enzymatic function remains poorly defined. Addressing this gap is essential for understanding how Prdx6 activity is regulated under physiological conditions. In particular, how conformational dynamics and small-molecule interactions influence Prdx6 function remains poorly understood. Identifying regulatory sites within Prdx6 and defining how endogenous metabolites interact with these sites is therefore essential for understanding fine-tuned control of its antioxidant activity.
Recently, our group reported that Prdx6 contains a cis-acting regulatory site within its sequence, as specific mutations were shown to modulate its peroxidase activity. This raises the possibility that small molecules binding to appropriate sites may function as trans-acting regulators of Prdx6. Cells contain a diverse pool of endogenous small metabolites that contribute to maintaining redox balance and protein stability. These molecules encompass sarcosine, taurine, glutamine, β alanine and others. In the present study, we aimed to investigate if these metabolites interact with Prdx6 and modulate its antioxidant capacity. Using various assays including biophysical, in silico and cellular approaches we evaluated the effect of 16 different metabolites on the structure and functional integrity of Prdx6. We observed that β alanine is an appropriate ligand of Prdx6 by virtue of its binding to an allosteric site consisting of residues Arg162, Trp181, Asp180, Val179, Pro178 and Thr 177. Additionally, the binding of β alanine helps to regulate peroxidase function of Prdx6 in vitro and cellular models by virtue of its ability to increase its thermodynamic stability, Tm.
It is important to note that the present study is primarily focused on the biochemical and structural regulation of Prdx6. The experiments performed in HeLa cells serve solely as a proof-of-concept system to validate intracellular activation of Prdx6 by β alanine.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Trizma base, EDTA, sodium hydroxide, Imidazole, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, glycerol, acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, ammonium persulfate, TEMED, glycine, β mercaptoethanol, 8-Anilinonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid (ANS), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), were all obtained from Sigma Aldrich Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India).
Luria Bertani (LB) broth and agar were sourced from Difco (Detroit, MI, USA). PBS tablets were supplied by Biobasic (Amherst, NY, USA), and Ni–NTA resin was purchased from Qiagen GmbH, Germany (Hilden, Germany). DNA molecular weight markers were acquired from GeneDireX Inc. (Taoyuan, Taiwan), while the dual-color precision protein marker was obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). Antibiotics including ampicillin and kanamycin were purchased from MP Biomedicals (Solon, OH, USA).

2.2. Expression and Purification of Human Prdx6

The plasmid encoding wild-type human Prdx6 in the pQE30-Xa vector was obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The construct was transformed into E. coli M15 [pREP4] cells, which were cultured in LB medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and kanamycin (50 μg/mL) at 37 °C with shaking. Protein expression was induced at OD600 0.4–0.6 by adding 0.5 mM IPTG, followed by incubation for 4 h at 37 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed using a buffer containing Tris (20 mM, pH 7.0), NaCl (50 mM), Imidazole (10 mM), lysozyme, RNaseA, and DNase, with sonication on ice. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation and filtered before loading onto a Ni–NTA agarose column pre-equilibrated with binding buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole). After overnight incubation at 4 °C, the column was washed with buffer containing 60 mM Imidazole, and Prdx6 was eluted with 500 mM Imidazole. Eluted fractions were pooled, treated with 5 μM EDTA to remove metal ions, dialyzed against 20 mM Tris (pH 7.0), 50 mM NaCl, and stored at −20 °C. Protein purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, and concentration determined by Bradford assay.

2.3. Hydrogen Peroxide Decay Assay

The enzymatic activity of Prdx6 was assessed by monitoring the rate of hydrogen peroxide breakdown using glutathione (GSH) as the reducing substrate. The standard assay mixture consisted of 10 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.0), 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium azide, and 0.2 mM GSH. The enzyme solution (6 µg protein/mL) was pre-incubated with gentle stirring until the absorbance at 240 nm stabilized. The reaction was initiated by introducing 250 µM H2O2, and the change in absorbance at 240 nm was tracked for 5–10 min. The observed decrease in absorbance was adjusted for minor nonenzymatic decomposition of H2O2. All measurements were conducted at ambient temperature (20 °C) [9].

2.4. HRP Competitive Assay

To determine the rate constant for the reaction between Prdx6 (7.5 μM) and hydrogen peroxide (10 μM), a competitive assay was performed using horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as the competing peroxidase. In this assay, HRP reacts with H2O2 to form compound I, a stable intermediate under the given conditions when no reducing agents are present [10,11,12]. Spectral measurements were obtained using a Jasco V-660 UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The concentration of HRP was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 403 nm using an extinction coefficient of ε403 = 1.02 × 105 M−1 cm−1. The formation of compound I was tracked by monitoring the decline in absorbance at 398 nm, which represents the isosbestic point between the oxidation states of HRP (HRP-I and HRP-II). The degree to which Prdx6 inhibited HRP activity was calculated using the following equation, where ΔAmax represents the average change in absorbance without Prdx6 and ΔAobs represents the change in its presence:
% Inhibition = [(ΔAmax − ΔAobs)/ΔAmax] × 100
This calculation reflects the competitive interaction between Prdx6 and HRP for hydrogen peroxide.

2.5. Circular Dichroism (CD) Measurements

CD spectra were recorded for Prdx6 using a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter equipped with a Peltier temperature control system. Measurements were carried out in 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer at pH 7.0. Protein concentration was maintained at 20 μM. Far-UV and near-UV spectra were collected using quartz cuvettes with path lengths of 0.1 cm and 1.0 cm, respectively. Each spectrum was averaged over four accumulations to ensure accuracy, and appropriate buffer blanks were subtracted from the final data [13]. Instrument calibration was performed using D-10-camphorsulfonic acid [14]. All measurements were repeated at least three times and average spectra were plotted using SigmaPlot 10.0 Software.

2.6. Tryptophan Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence emission of Prdx6 (0.1 mg/mL) in 20 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.0) was analyzed using a Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). Excitation was carried out at 295 nm and emission spectra were recorded over the range of 300 to 600 nm. Both excitation and emission slit widths were set to 10 nm. Measurements were performed in a 3 mm path length quartz cuvette. Each fluorescence spectrum was obtained in triplicate to ensure reproducibility, and the average fluorescence emission curves were plotted using SigmaPlot 10.0 software.

2.7. ANS Binding Assay

To study ANS–protein interactions, fluorescence emission spectra were recorded between 400 nm and 600 nm with excitation at 350 nm. The ANS concentration used in the assay was maintained at a level 16-fold higher than that of the protein. The molar concentration of ANS was determined using its molar extinction coefficient (ε = 5000 M−1 cm−1 at 350 nm). Following addition of ANS, samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and spectra were collected in triplicate. The average emission profiles were analyzed and plotted using SigmaPlot 10.0 software [15].

2.8. Heat-Induced Denaturation Studies

Thermal unfolding of Prdx6 in the presence of β alanine was investigated using a Jasco spectropolarimeter equipped with a temperature unit. Temperature was increased gradually from 20 °C to 85 °C at a rate of 1 °C min−1, allowing sufficient time for equilibration at each step. Absorbance changes at 295 nm were monitored for 20 µM protein samples to evaluate thermal stability. Each experiment was repeated three times, and the averaged data were plotted using SigmaPlot 10.0 software [15].

2.9. Molecular Docking Studies

The crystal structure of Prdx6 (PDB ID: 5B6M) was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank and processed using Maestro v11 (Schrödinger LLC, New York, NY, USA). Preparation steps involved removing water molecules and heteroatoms, followed by structural refinement and energy minimization using the OPLS-3 force field at physiological pH (7.4) [16]. Potential ligand-binding sites were identified through SiteMap analysis [17,18]. Induced Fit Docking (IFD) of β alanine with Prdx6 was conducted with the Glide module, targeting the top 5 predicted binding pockets [19,20]. The β alanine ligand structure was obtained from ChEBI in SDF format, energy-minimized, and processed via LigPrep, considering stereochemistry, tautomerism, and ionization states [21,22]. Docking grids were centered on the critical residues of each binding site, and resulting complexes were ranked based on Glide docking scores and energies. Visualization of docked complexes was performed using PyMOL 3.1 [23].

2.10. Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out using GROMACS version 2022.04, applying the CHARMM27 force field [24,25]. The protein-ligand complexes were first stripped of docked ligands and water molecules, then solvated within a triclinic TIP3P water box. System neutrality was achieved by adding 25 sodium (Na+) and 23 chloride (Cl) ions [26]. Energy minimization was performed using the steepest descent algorithm, followed by equilibration phases under NVT and NPT ensembles for 5 ns each. Production MD simulations were run for 100 ns, and trajectories were analyzed for root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), principal component analysis (PCA), radius of gyration (Rg), hydrogen bond dynamics, and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) [27]. Electrostatic interactions were calculated using the Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method, with bond constraints maintained via the LINCS algorithm [28].

2.11. Measurement of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species

HeLa cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) were seeded in 12-well plates containing DMEM media and allowed to attach for 24 h under standard conditions. After attachment, the cells were treated with different concentrations of osmolytes for 24 h, following which the media was removed. Cells were then incubated with DCFH-DA dye (25 µM) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. DCFH-DA permeates the cell membrane and is deacetylated by intracellular esterases to DCFH, a non-fluorescent compound. In the presence of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), DCFH is oxidized to DCF, which is highly fluorescent. After incubation, unbound dye was removed by washing, and the cells were kept in PBS. Fluorescence microscopy was used to analyze intracellular ROS generation by measuring DCF fluorescence.
HeLa cells were used solely as a reproducible cellular system for mechanistic validation of Prdx6-mediated redox modulation.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. For experiments involving > 2 groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was applied. For comparisons involving two groups, an unpaired t-test was used. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sample size (n = 3) is indicated in the figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. β Alanine Increases Functional Activity of Prdx6

Screening of various endogenous metabolites was performed to evaluate their effects on Prdx6 activity using direct decay assay that is dependent on the hydrolytic potential of H2O2. As shown in Figure 1, the presence of metabolites including sorbitol, myo-inositol and aspartate exhibit partial increase in the peroxidase activity while others except β alanine, had no significant effect on Prdx6 activity, with percent activity remaining relatively constant across tested concentrations. β alanine caused a dose-dependent increase in Prdx6 activity. We have again validated the observed effect of β alanine on the peroxidase function of Prdx6 by analyzing activity using HRP competitive assay (Figure 2).
This finding indicated β alanine as a distinct regulator of Prdx6 function among the tested metabolites.

3.2. β Alanine Binds to Prdx6

To confirm that the increase in peroxidase activity is by binding with β alanine, we identified potential ligand binding pocket in Prdx6 using Molecular docking Site Map module of Schrödinger. This analysis revealed at least 5 sites, with their residues and site scores listed in Table 1a. Subsequent Glide docking of β alanine at these sites showed a range of binding energies from −15.0 to −26.0 kcal/mol (Table 1b). Notably, site 1 exhibited the strongest interaction (Glide energy−26.0 kcal/mol; docking score −5.1) which shows that the β alanine binds to the Arg162 and Asp180 residues of Prdx6. Figure 3a,b shows the 2D and 3D binding poses of β alanine, revealing key residues including Arg162, Trp181, Asp180, Val179, Pro178 and Thr 177. β alanine forms hydrogen bond with Arg162 and Asp180. To assess the stability of this interaction, 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed (Figure 4). RMSD plots indicated that both free and β alanine bound Prdx6 systems reached equilibrium early and remained stable throughout, with a minor average RMSD decrease of 0.1 Å upon β alanine binding. RMSF analysis revealed reduced flexibility in residues 79–89, 115–127, 140–153 and 204–217 in the β alanine bound complex. Radius of gyration (Rg) values suggested slight contraction of the β alanine bound protein, though solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) remained largely unchanged, indicating that expansion did not substantially affect solvation properties. Hydrogen bond analysis showed that in the initial 10 ns there were two hydrogen bonds and one consistent hydrogen bond throughout the simulation, with bond lengths fluctuating between 1.79 and 1.82 Å, confirming a stable interaction.

3.3. Binding of β Alanine Brings About Confirmational Changes in Prdx6

To obtain a better understanding of the mechanism for increase in peroxidase activity of Prdx6, we assessed structural properties of the protein upon overnight incubation with β alanine. Figure 5a,b shows the far- and near-UV CD spectra upon overnight incubation with β alanine. The Far-UV CD spectra analysis of Prdx6 in the presence and absence of β alanine demonstrates that treatment with 250 μM β alanine leads to notable increase in the protein’s secondary structure. Specifically, the CD spectral shifts and changes in molar ellipticity, most prominently observed between 208 nm and 222 nm, indicate that β alanine induces conformational changes in Prdx6. These structural modifications suggest direct interaction or effect of β alanine on the folding or stability of the protein, which could have functional implications for Prdx6 activity. Near-UV CD analysis demonstrated that the addition of 250 μM β alanine caused significant alterations in Prdx6 tertiary structure, as indicated by increased ellipticity and a spectral shift in the aromatic region (250–320 nm). These results imply that β alanine induces noticeable perturbations in the tertiary environment. We have further investigated alterations in the Tryptophan environment of Prdx6 using Trp fluorescence (Figure 5c). A significant increase in the fluorescence intensity at 350 nm region was observed confirming perturbations in Trp micro-environment of Prdx6 in presence of β alanine, indicating that the local tertiary environment around tryptophan residues was also changed by β alanine. To assess the exposure of hydrophobic regions to the solvent, ANS fluorescence experiments were conducted on Prdx6 with and without β alanine. The absence of spectral shifts and only minor change in fluorescence intensity following β alanine treatment, indicates no significant exposure of hydrophobic groups.

3.4. β Alanine Enhances the Thermodynamic Stability of Prdx6

To investigate the impact of β alanine on the thermodynamic stability of Prdx6, we performed heat-induced denaturation experiments. Representative heat-induced denaturation curves are shown in Figure 6 and the resultant thermodynamic parameters are given in Table 2. It is seen in the figure and the table that in the presence of β alanine, the transition curves have been shifted to higher Tm values. Our results demonstrated that in the presence of β alanine, the thermodynamic parameters associated with Prdx6 unfolding, such as melting temperature and enthalpy change, increased, suggesting enhanced thermal stability. This enhancement indicates that β alanine may stabilize the native conformation of Prdx6, potentially by shifting the folding-unfolding equilibrium towards the native state. Such a shift implies that a larger fraction of the protein remains properly folded under thermal stress when β alanine is present.
Note: HeLa cells were used as a proof-of-concept model for ROS quantification due to their reproducible DCFH-DA response and endogenous Prdx6 expression. These experiments were intended to validate β-alanine-mediated Prdx6 activation in a controlled cellular system.

3.5. β Alanine Reduces ROS Level in Hela Cells

ROS fluorescence imaging as shown in Figure 7b, demonstrated a pronounced decrease in the number and intensity of ROS-positive cells in the β alanine-treated group compared to the control (Figure 7a), consistent with the quantitative analysis showing roughly 80% inhibition of ROS levels following β alanine supplementation. These results clearly indicate the strong ROS-scavenging and antioxidant effect of β alanine in HeLa cells (via activating Prdx6).
The fluorescence microscopy images are presented as qualitative proof-of-concept visualization of intracellular ROS modulation and are not intended for detailed cellular or morphological characterization. HeLa cells were used as a reproducible model system to support the biochemical findings. We acknowledge that definitive cellular validation would require nuclear counterstaining and normalization to cell number; these experiments are beyond the scope of the present mechanistic study and are identified as important future directions.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we have screened at least 16 different endogenous cellular metabolites for their impact on the peroxidase function of Prdx6 (Figure 1). We observed certain metabolites including glutamate, glycine, taurine, L-histidine, betaine, glutamine, NAA, mannitol, creatine, sarcosine, DMG and proline do not have any significant effect on the peroxidase function of Prdx6. On the other hand, there are metabolites that exhibit partial increase in the peroxidase activity. These metabolites encompass sorbitol, myo-inositol and aspartate. Interestingly, β alanine is found to have modest effect increasing the peroxidase activity in a dose dependent manner. The results indicate that β alanine is a biochemical activator of Prdx6. To date there are reports of the existence of inhibitors of Prdx6 including Mercaptosuccinate, Withangulatin A and Thiacremonone. This is the first kind of report that identifies an effective activator of Prdx6. These findings provide biochemical insight into Prdx6 regulation and establish a mechanistic foundation for future investigations in more complex biological systems.
Next, we were further interested in investigating the mechanism by which β alanine enhances the peroxidase function of Prdx6. An increase in the activity could be due to the fact that β alanine is a ligand of Prdx6 that binds to an allosteric site and influences its function. For this, it is important to identify putative binding site of β alanine. Our results using site map indicate the existence of five different strong binding site of β alanine. Out of which, the first site having the residues Arg162, Trp181, Asp180, Val179, Pro178 and Thr 177 exhibit the strongest binding potential with glide energy and docking scores of −26 and −5.1, respectively. We observed that the interaction comprises H-bonds with Arg162 and Asp180 residues. Second, we performed in silico MD simulation studies of the docked complex for 100 ns. The resultant RMSD analysis revealed stability of the complex with reduced flexibility at around 79–89, 115–127, 140–153, and 204–217 residues, indicating the involvement of this region in the overall interaction with the β alanine. There is slight decrease in Rg and SASA in the presence of β alanine. This confirms that β alanine binds to Prdx6 and could modulate its function. The present study identifies a putative allosteric pocket comprising Arg162, Asp180 and neighboring residues; however, definitive validation requires mutagenesis of these key residues. These experiments are planned for future work and are now acknowledged as an important experimental limitation. Interestingly, the stabilization observed in the C-terminal region overlaps with dynamic structural elements that communicate with the peroxidase catalytic site (Cys47-His39-Arg132). Previous structural analyses have shown that distal conformational changes can modulate peroxidase efficiency by altering accessibility and packing around the catalytic triad. Therefore, the β alanine-induced reduction in local flexibility likely contributes to an allosteric mechanism in which stabilization of the C-terminal site enhances catalytic activity, consistent with the increased peroxidase function observed experimentally. Since the binding sites of β alanine closely lie inside the C-terminal region (that ranges from 175 to 224 amino acid residues), we proposed that the cis-acting site of Prdx6 comes under the C-terminal portion not in the thioredoxin fold. We note that these simulations were designed to probe structural stabilization and residue flexibility rather than to compute binding thermodynamics; dedicated MM/PBSA or MM/GBSA calculations were therefore not carried out. Moreover, we did not perform an explicit trajectory-level analysis of conformational coupling at the catalytic triad (Cys47–His39–Arg132). The predicted β alanine site lies spatially distant from the catalytic center, consistent with an allosteric mechanism, but proof of causal allosteric communication (for example via enhanced sampling or energetic decomposition) remains a priority for future computational work.
If β alanine binds and acts as a ligand of Prdx6, there should be altered structural consequences due to the binding. For this, using various spectroscopic techniques, we have assessed the conformational changes in Prdx6 upon binding of β alanine. We observed that there is an increase in the secondary structure content as revealed by Far-CD spectroscopy and an eventual increase in the tertiary structure as evident from the Near-CD spectra and an increase in the tryptophan fluorescence, indicating structural stabilization and this stabilization could have impacted the overall packing of the hydrophobic group. Therefore, we used ANS dye to probe for any exposed hydrophobic group to the solvent and since there is no shifting in bands as well as increase in hydrophobicity, no ANS binding was found.
The structural stabilization due to binding of β alanine might have brought about an increase in the thermodynamic stability of Prdx6 leading to the shift in the thermodynamic equilibrium N ⇌ D state towards the left. To investigate this possibility, we have intentionally measured Tm of Prdx6 in the absence and presence of β alanine (Figure 6). We observed that as expected, there is an increase in the Tm of the protein due to the presence of β alanine relative to the control. The increase in thermodynamic stability results in the population of more functionally active fractions in the native state leading to enhancement in peroxidase function. At the cellular level, increased peroxidase activity would be expected to contribute to reduced ROS, consistent with our proof-of-concept observations. For this we took HeLa cells and treated them with β alanine and measured the ROS levels. We found a large reduction in the ROS levels relative to the β alanine untreated control, consistent with β alanine–mediated modulation of Prdx6 activity. As these experiments were performed in HeLa cells, which are non-muscle in origin, the reduction in intracellular ROS should be interpreted strictly as evidence of β alanine–mediated activation of Prdx6 rather than as evidence of tissue-specific physiological relevance. These results demonstrate intracellular mechanistic activation only, not muscle-specific physiology. The reduction in ROS following β alanine treatment is in agreement with the enhanced peroxidase activity of Prdx6 observed in our biochemical assays. However, because HeLa cells contain multiple antioxidant systems, this result on its own cannot isolate the specific contribution of Prdx6. A definitive demonstration of Prdx6-dependence would require targeted knockdown or inhibition, which was beyond the scope of the present biochemical and structural study. We therefore acknowledge this as a limitation and identify Prdx6-silencing experiments as an important next step for establishing cellular causality with higher precision.
Although Prdx6 possesses both peroxidase and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activities, the current study specifically focused on peroxidase function because PLA2 requires acidic pH or phosphorylation-dependent activation, conditions not optimized in the present biochemical setup. Importantly, the molecular docking results indicate that the β alanine binding site lies within the C-terminal region, away from the catalytic PLA2 triad (Ser32–His26–Asp140), suggesting minimal direct interference with PLA2 activity. These observations indicate that β alanine-induced stabilization is mainly relevant to peroxidase function, while modulation of PLA2 remains an important future direction. Taken together, we conclude that β alanine is a ligand of Prdx6. Recently, our group reported that Prdx6 contains a cis-acting regulatory sequence that helps in regulating the peroxidase function of Prdx6. Our present data further add on to the mechanistic insight that small molecules like β alanine could be trans-acting regulatory molecule of Prdx6. The results, therefore, introduce a new paradigm of Prdx6 allosteric regulation in vitro.
The findings extend the conventional understanding of β alanine beyond its well-documented role in carnosine synthesis and pH buffering, positioning it as a metabolic regulator with direct enzymatic implications. The present findings establish β alanine as an allosteric regulator of Prdx6 that enhances its peroxidase activity and thermodynamic stability. The primary contribution of this study lies in defining a novel biochemical mechanism by which an endogenous metabolite modulates Prdx6 activity.
It is important to emphasize that HeLa cells were used solely as a proof-of-concept cellular system due to their reproducibility and endogenous Prdx6 expression. These experiments were designed to validate intracellular activation of Prdx6 and reduction in reactive oxygen species.

5. Conclusions

This study identifies β alanine as a novel biochemical modulator of Peroxiredoxin 6, enhancing its peroxidase activity and structural stability through an allosteric mechanism. The observed reduction in intracellular reactive oxygen species in a proof-of-concept cellular system supports its role in Prdx6-associated cellular redox regulation. These findings provide mechanistic insight into Prdx6 regulation and establish a foundation for future investigations in tissue-specific and disease-relevant models.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and L.R.S.; methodology, A.K., H.R. and L.R.S.; Software, S.Y.; validation, A.K., M.S.A. and L.R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. and L.R.S.; writing—review & editing, A.K., K.S., S.Y. and L.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is partly supported by grants from DU-IOE [IOE/2024-2025/12/FRP] provided to L.R.S. and UGC-SRF provided to A.K.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hong, Y.; Boiti, A.; Vallone, D.; Foulkes, N.S. Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling and Oxidative Stress: Transcriptional Regulation and Evolution. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kang, S.W.; Baines, I.C.; Rhee, S.G. Characterization of a mammalian peroxiredoxin that contains one conserved cysteine. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 6303–6311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, J.W.; Dodia, C.; Feinstein, S.I.; Jain, M.K.; Fisher, A.B. 1-Cys peroxiredoxin, a bifunctional enzyme with glutathione peroxidase and phospholipase A2 activities. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 28421–28427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, H.; Benipal, B.; Zhou, S.; Dodia, C.; Chatterjee, S.; Tao, J.-Q.; Sorokina, E.M.; Raabe, T.; Feinstein, S.I.; Fisher, A.B. Critical role of peroxiredoxin 6 in the repair of peroxidized cell membranes following oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 87, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fisher, A.B. Peroxiredoxin 6: A Bifunctional Enzyme with Glutathione Peroxidase and Phospholipase A2 Activities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lien, Y.C.; Feinstein, S.I.; Dodia, C.; Fisher, A.B. The Roles of Peroxidase and Phospholipase A2 Activities of Peroxiredoxin 6 in Protecting Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells Against Peroxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 440–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manevich, Y.; Reddy, K.S.; Shuvaeva, T.; Feinstein, S.I.; Fisher, A.B. Structure and phospholipase function of peroxiredoxin 6: Identification of the catalytic triad and its role in phospholipid substrate binding. J. Lipid Res. 2007, 48, 2306–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manevich, Y.; Shuvaeva, T.; Dodia, C.; Kazi, A.; Feinstein, S.I.; Fisher, A.B. Binding of peroxiredoxin 6 to substrate determines differential phospholipid hydroperoxide peroxidase and phospholipase A(2) activities. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 485, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shahnaj, S.; Potshangbam, A.M.; Chowhan, R.K.; Parray, Z.A.; Kakchingtabam, P.; Kumari, A.; Islam, A.; Khan, A.; Singh, L.R.; Rahaman, H. The anti-oxidant enzyme, Prdx6 might have cis-acting regulatory sequence(s). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 1139–1150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hewson, W.D.; Hager, L.P. Oxidation of horseradish peroxidase compound II to compound I. J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 3182–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nelson, K.J.; Parsonage, D. Measurement of peroxiredoxin activity. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 7.10.1–7.10.28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Toledo, J.C.; Audi, R.; Ogusucu, R.; Monteiro, G.; Netto, L.E.S.; Augusto, O. Horseradish peroxidase compound I as a tool to investigate reactive protein-cysteine residues: From quantification to kinetics. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 50, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kelly, S.M.; Jess, T.J.; Price, N.C. How to study proteins by circular dichroism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1751, 119–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mittal, S.; Singh, L.R. Denatured state structural property determines protein stabilization by macromolecular crowding: A thermodynamic and structural approach. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chowhan, R.K.; Hotumalani, S.; Rahaman, H.; Singh, L.R. pH Induced Conformational Alteration in Human Peroxiredoxin 6 Might be Responsible for Its Resistance Against Lysosomal pH or High Temperature. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sastry, G.M.; Adzhigirey, M.; Day, T.; Annabhimoju, R.; Sherman, W. Protein and Ligand Preparation: Parameters, Protocols, and Influence on Virtual Screening Enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alzyoud, L.; Bryce, R.A.; Al Sorkhy, M.; Atatreh, N.; Ghattas, M.A. Structure-Based Assessment and Druggability Classification of Protein–Protein Interaction Sites. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Halgren, T.A. Identifying and Characterizing Binding Sites and Assessing Druggability. J. Chem. Inf. Modeling 2009, 49, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Friesner, R.A.; Banks, J.L.; Murphy, R.B.; Halgren, T.A.; Klicic, J.J.; Mainz, D.T.; Repasky, M.P.; Knoll, E.H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J.K.; et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Halgren, T.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Friesner, R.A.; Beard, H.S.; Frye, L.L.; Pollard, W.T.; Banks, J.L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abramyan, A.M.; Bochicchio, A.; Wu, C.; Damm, W.; Langley, D.R.; Shivakumar, D.; Lupyan, D.; Wang, L.; Harder, E.; Oloo, E.O. Accurate Physics-Based Prediction of Binding Affinities of RNA- and DNA-Targeting Ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 1392–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nie, Z.; Bonnert, R.; Tsien, J.; Deng, X.; Higgs, C.; El Mazouni, F.; Zhang, X.; Li, R.; Ho, N.; Feher, V.; et al. Structure-Based Discovery and Development of Highly Potent Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors for Malaria Chemoprevention. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 68, 590–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lill, M.A.; Danielson, M.L. Computer-aided drug design platform using PyMOL. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2011, 25, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Berendsen, H.J.C.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lozano, R.; Naghavi, M.; Foreman, K.; Lim, S.; Shibuya, K.; Aboyans, V.; Abraham, J.; Adair, T.; Aggarwal, R.; Ahn, S.Y.; et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012, 380, 2095–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jo, S.; Kim, T.; Iyer, V.G.; Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 1859–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Childers, M.C.; Daggett, V. Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 6673–6689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Genheden, S.; Ryde, U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2015, 10, 449–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Screening of endogenous metabolites affecting Prdx6 peroxidase activity. The effect of selected endogenous metabolites on Prdx6 peroxidase activity was assessed using a hydrogen peroxide decay assay. (a) Sorbitol, (b) myo-inositol, (c) aspartate, and (d) β alanine were tested at 50, 100, 250, and 500 µM, with untreated Prdx6 serving as control. Data are presented as percent activity relative to control (mean ± SEM, n = 3). Statistical significance compared to control was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test and is indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. β alanine showed a pronounced dose-dependent activation of Prdx6 compared to other metabolites.
Figure 1. Screening of endogenous metabolites affecting Prdx6 peroxidase activity. The effect of selected endogenous metabolites on Prdx6 peroxidase activity was assessed using a hydrogen peroxide decay assay. (a) Sorbitol, (b) myo-inositol, (c) aspartate, and (d) β alanine were tested at 50, 100, 250, and 500 µM, with untreated Prdx6 serving as control. Data are presented as percent activity relative to control (mean ± SEM, n = 3). Statistical significance compared to control was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test and is indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. β alanine showed a pronounced dose-dependent activation of Prdx6 compared to other metabolites.
Biophysica 06 00011 g001
Figure 2. Effect of β alanine on Prdx6 peroxidase activity measured by HRP competitive assay. Percent oxidation of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the presence of Prdx6 and increasing concentrations of β alanine (50–500 µM) is shown. Decreased HRP oxidation indicates enhanced Prdx6 peroxidase activity. HRP-only and Prdx6-alone controls are included. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance versus Prdx6 alone was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and is indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 compared to control. The arrow indicates increasing β alanine concentration.
Figure 2. Effect of β alanine on Prdx6 peroxidase activity measured by HRP competitive assay. Percent oxidation of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the presence of Prdx6 and increasing concentrations of β alanine (50–500 µM) is shown. Decreased HRP oxidation indicates enhanced Prdx6 peroxidase activity. HRP-only and Prdx6-alone controls are included. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance versus Prdx6 alone was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test and is indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 compared to control. The arrow indicates increasing β alanine concentration.
Biophysica 06 00011 g002
Figure 3. In silico molecular docking studies showing binding of β alanine with Prdx6. (a) 2D ligand interaction diagram of β alanine with Prdx6. (b) 3D graphical representation of β alanine bound to Prdx6. Arrows indicate key ligand-residue interactions, and surface colors represents electrostatic potential.
Figure 3. In silico molecular docking studies showing binding of β alanine with Prdx6. (a) 2D ligand interaction diagram of β alanine with Prdx6. (b) 3D graphical representation of β alanine bound to Prdx6. Arrows indicate key ligand-residue interactions, and surface colors represents electrostatic potential.
Biophysica 06 00011 g003
Figure 4. (a) The RMSD plot showing the changes between the stabilities in the observed systems. (b) The graphical representation of the changes observed in the fluctuation of the constituent residues between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (c) The Rg plots showing the difference in the compactness between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (d) The graphical representation of the changes observed in the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (e) Hydrogen bond fluctuations plot highlighting the changes in the observed number. (f) Fluctuations in the hydrogen bond length throughout the run.
Figure 4. (a) The RMSD plot showing the changes between the stabilities in the observed systems. (b) The graphical representation of the changes observed in the fluctuation of the constituent residues between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (c) The Rg plots showing the difference in the compactness between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (d) The graphical representation of the changes observed in the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) between the β alanine bound and unbound Prdx6. (e) Hydrogen bond fluctuations plot highlighting the changes in the observed number. (f) Fluctuations in the hydrogen bond length throughout the run.
Biophysica 06 00011 g004
Figure 5. Conformational status of Prdx6 in the presence of β alanine. The secondary and tertiary structure of Prdx6 in the presence of 250 μM β alanine is determined using (a) Far-UV CD, (b) Near-UV CD, and (c) tryptophan fluorescence. ANS binding assay measurements were also performed (d).
Figure 5. Conformational status of Prdx6 in the presence of β alanine. The secondary and tertiary structure of Prdx6 in the presence of 250 μM β alanine is determined using (a) Far-UV CD, (b) Near-UV CD, and (c) tryptophan fluorescence. ANS binding assay measurements were also performed (d).
Biophysica 06 00011 g005
Figure 6. Effect of β alanine on thermal stability of Prdx6. Heat-induced denaturation experiments were performed to investigate the impact of β alanine on the thermodynamic stability of Prdx6.
Figure 6. Effect of β alanine on thermal stability of Prdx6. Heat-induced denaturation experiments were performed to investigate the impact of β alanine on the thermodynamic stability of Prdx6.
Biophysica 06 00011 g006
Figure 7. Proof-of-concept intracellular ROS modulation by β alanine. Representative DCFH-DA fluorescence images of untreated (a) and β alanine-treated HeLa cells (b) and relative ROS fluorescence quantification (c). Images are shown qualitatively to illustrate intracellular ROS changes. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. HeLa cells were used as a model system to support mechanistic conclusions and no cellular morphological interpretation is implied.
Figure 7. Proof-of-concept intracellular ROS modulation by β alanine. Representative DCFH-DA fluorescence images of untreated (a) and β alanine-treated HeLa cells (b) and relative ROS fluorescence quantification (c). Images are shown qualitatively to illustrate intracellular ROS changes. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. HeLa cells were used as a model system to support mechanistic conclusions and no cellular morphological interpretation is implied.
Biophysica 06 00011 g007
Table 1. (a) Predicted ligand-binding sites of Prdx6 identified using SiteMap analysis. Site score reflects SiteMap druggability scoring based on pocket size, enclosure, exposure, hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance, and hydrogen-bonding features. (b) Docking score and Glide energy for β alanine binding at five predicted Prdx6 pockets.
Table 1. (a) Predicted ligand-binding sites of Prdx6 identified using SiteMap analysis. Site score reflects SiteMap druggability scoring based on pocket size, enclosure, exposure, hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance, and hydrogen-bonding features. (b) Docking score and Glide energy for β alanine binding at five predicted Prdx6 pockets.
(a)
S. No.Site Score
1−0.92
2−0.85
3−0.81
4−0.74
5−0.43
(b)
S. No.Docking ScoreGlide Energy (kcal/mol)
1−5.1−26
2−4.2−23
3−4.0−21
4−3.6−17
5−3.4−15
Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters of Prdx6 in the presence of β alanine at two concentrations. Values represent mean ± SD. Tm = melting temperature; ΔHm = enthalpy change at Tm; ΔG° = Gibbs free energy change.
Table 2. Thermodynamic parameters of Prdx6 in the presence of β alanine at two concentrations. Values represent mean ± SD. Tm = melting temperature; ΔHm = enthalpy change at Tm; ΔG° = Gibbs free energy change.
β Alanine (µM)Tm (°C)ΔHm (kcal/mol)ΔG° (kcal/mol)
051.6 ± 1.172.8 ± 2.34.8 ± 0.29
25053.7 ± 1.280.3 ± 2.85.0 ± 0.34
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumari, A.; Singh, K.; Yumlembam, S.; Rahaman, H.; Ansari, M.S.; Singh, L.R. β Alanine Modulates the Activity and Stability of Peroxiredoxin 6: A Biochemical and Mechanistic Study. Biophysica 2026, 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica6010011

AMA Style

Kumari A, Singh K, Yumlembam S, Rahaman H, Ansari MS, Singh LR. β Alanine Modulates the Activity and Stability of Peroxiredoxin 6: A Biochemical and Mechanistic Study. Biophysica. 2026; 6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica6010011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumari, Anju, Kuldeep Singh, Seemasundari Yumlembam, Hamidur Rahaman, Mohd Saquib Ansari, and Laishram Rajendrakumar Singh. 2026. "β Alanine Modulates the Activity and Stability of Peroxiredoxin 6: A Biochemical and Mechanistic Study" Biophysica 6, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica6010011

APA Style

Kumari, A., Singh, K., Yumlembam, S., Rahaman, H., Ansari, M. S., & Singh, L. R. (2026). β Alanine Modulates the Activity and Stability of Peroxiredoxin 6: A Biochemical and Mechanistic Study. Biophysica, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/biophysica6010011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop