The Interplay Between Business Models and Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Aging Populations: Insights from Emerging Economies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- O1.
- To analyze the relationship between entrepreneurial capacities and each of the nine components of the Business Model Canvas: market segment, value proposition, distribution channels, customer relationships, revenue streams, key resources, key activities, key partnerships, and cost structure.
- O2.
- To identify gaps in knowledge, training, or institutional support that may hinder the application of business models among elderly participants.
- O3.
- To provide policy-oriented recommendations for integrating entrepreneurial training into social assistance programs aimed at older adults.
2. Literature Review and Theoretical Foundations
2.1. Background
2.2. Theoretical and Scientific Foundations
2.3. Conceptual Framework
- Customer Segments: Identifying and targeting groups of customers based on shared characteristics, behaviors, or needs. Segmentation enables tailored value delivery and more efficient resource allocation.
- Value Proposition: The central offering that solves a problem or fulfills a need. It is what differentiates a business from competitors and drives customer loyalty.
- Channels: The pathways through which products or services reach customers. This includes communication, distribution, and sales infrastructures.
- Customer Relationships: Strategies to attract, retain, and enhance customer engagement, including personalized service, loyalty programs, and after-sales support.
- Revenue Streams: The sources through which income is generated, whether through transactional or recurring models.
- Key Resources: Assets critical to the delivery of the value proposition, which may be physical, human, intellectual, or financial in nature.
- Key Activities: Operational tasks essential to business functioning, such as production, marketing, or customer service.
- Key Partnerships: Strategic alliances with suppliers, collaborators, or institutions that enhance business efficiency and scalability.
- Cost Structure: The financial architecture of the business, including fixed and variable costs associated with operations and growth.
- Self-confidence: The belief in one’s ability to succeed, make decisions, and take initiative in uncertain environments.
- Creativity: The ability to generate innovative ideas and adapt to changing circumstances through problem-solving and original thinking.
- Initiative: A proactive attitude towards identifying and acting upon opportunities without external prompting.
- Perseverance: The capacity to remain committed to goals despite obstacles or setbacks, often linked to discipline and resilience.
- Teamwork: The skill to collaborate effectively, delegate responsibilities, and contribute to collective outcomes through empathy and communication.
3. Methods
3.1. Research Methodology
3.2. Type, Level, and Research Design
3.3. Population and Sample Description
3.4. Data Collection Techniques and Instruments
- Business Model Questionnaire: This instrument operationalized the nine components of the model: customer segments, value proposition, channels, customer relationships, revenue streams, key resources, key activities, key partnerships, and cost structure. The questionnaire was structured with closed-ended items using a five-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”, allowing respondents to express the degree of relevance or understanding they attributed to each dimension.
- Entrepreneurial Capacities Questionnaire: This instrument conceptualizes five core entrepreneurial competencies: self-confidence, creativity, initiative, perseverance, and teamwork. The items were likewise presented in a Likert scale format to measure frequency or intensity of behavior, enabling a quantitative assessment of each dimension.
3.5. Data Processing and Analysis
- Descriptive Statistics: The first phase involved summarizing the key characteristics of the sample and the distribution of responses across all questionnaire items. Measures of central tendency (mean, median, mode) and dispersion (standard deviation, range) were calculated for each dimension of the business model and entrepreneurial capacities. Additionally, frequency distributions and percentage values were used to profile the demographic characteristics of participants and their perceptions in each variable domain.
- Inferential Statistics: The second phase aimed to test this study’s central hypothesis: whether a statistically significant relationship exists between business model components and entrepreneurial capacities in older adults. Given that the data were ordinal and did not assume a normal distribution, Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient (Rho) was used as the primary inferential test.
3.6. Ethical Considerations
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive Results on Quality of Service (Variable 1)
4.2. Descriptive Results on Entrepreneurial Capacity (Variable 2)
4.3. Normality Test—Inferential Statistics
4.4. Testing the General Hypothesis
4.5. Specific Hypothesis Testing
5. Discussion
5.1. Analysis and Discussion of Results
5.2. Comparison with Previous Studies
5.3. Recommendations for Future Research
- Future research could build upon these findings by evaluating whether targeted training in specific business model components—such as revenue streams or customer segmentation—significantly enhances entrepreneurial outcomes among older adults. This would allow for a more precise understanding of how the competencies identified in this study translate into practical business success.
- Expand the Geographical Scope: This study was limited to the district of Llaylla, Satipo, which, while representative of rural Andean–Amazonian populations, does not capture the diversity of socioeconomic and cultural realities across Peru. Future research should include comparative studies across multiple districts or regions, such as coastal and highland zones, to identify geographical patterns and regional disparities in entrepreneurial engagement among Pensión 65 beneficiaries. Such work could also explore differences in access to training, markets, or institutional support.
- Adopt Longitudinal Designs: Given that this study employed a cross-sectional design, it was not possible to assess how entrepreneurial capacities or business model understanding evolve over time. Among the various lines of future inquiry, longitudinal studies are especially crucial to understanding the long-term impact of business training interventions on entrepreneurial behavior. Future research should consider longitudinal approaches to evaluate the impact of specific interventions, such as training programs, technical assistance, or institutional partnerships, on the entrepreneurial trajectories of older adults. This would provide more robust evidence on causality and long-term outcomes, aligning with findings from references [16,17].
- Incorporate Mixed Methods: While the quantitative approach provided measurable correlations, it did not capture the rich, subjective experiences of participants. Future studies could adopt mixed methods designs, combining statistical analysis with in-depth interviews or case studies. This would allow researchers to explore motivations, perceptions, barriers, and enabling factors in more nuanced ways, as recommended in studies focused on emotional intelligence and entrepreneurship [18].
- Explore Institutional and Policy Dimensions: There is a need for research that critically examines the institutional frameworks surrounding programs like Pensión 65, particularly in terms of their capacity to integrate entrepreneurial training. Future studies should assess the role of public–private partnerships, local governments, and civil society organizations in supporting productive aging. Such research could build on international case studies and models that have successfully linked social assistance with inclusive entrepreneurship [13,14].
- Investigate Technology and Innovation in Older Adult Enterprises: Future research could examine the role of digital tools, e-commerce platforms, and agroecological innovation in supporting older adult entrepreneurs. Given that many rural elderly lack digital literacy, exploring how adapted technologies or intermediaries could bridge this gap may open new avenues for market access and productivity [11].
- Evaluate Gender-Specific Dynamics: Future research should also explore gender differences in entrepreneurial capacity and business development among elderly populations. Understanding how gendered experiences shape access to resources, social networks, and institutional recognition can inform more inclusive program design and support frameworks.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leinaweaver, J. Counter-Demography: Situated Caring for the Aged in Andean Peru. Med. Anthropol. 2021, 41, 630–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Institute of Statistics and Informatics. Situation of the Older Adult Population: October–November–December 2024. Available online: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/inei/informes-publicaciones/6605186-situacion-de-la-poblacion-adulta-mayor-octubre-noviembre-diciembre-2024 (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- United Nations Population Fund-Peru. Elderly Adults in Peru. Available online: https://peru.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/UNFPA-Ficha-Adultos-Mayores-Peru.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion. Productive Knowledge—Guide for Teams Designated by Local Governments. Available online: https://www.pension65.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GUIA-SABERES.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion. National Program of Solidarity Assistance Pensión 65. Available online: https://www.gob.pe/pension65 (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Osterwalder, A.; Pigneur, Y. Business Model Generation. Kybernetes 2012, 41, 823–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J. Identification and Evaluation of a Market Opportunity of Elderly Caring Service. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Innovative Management and Economics (ISIME 2021), Moscow, Russia, 2–3 June 2021; pp. 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Program of Solidarity Assistance Pensión 65. National Contest “Ancestral Producers”. Available online: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/pension65/campañas/11897-concurso-nacional-productores-ancestrales (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Cabrera, V.; Donaldson, S. PERMA to PERMA+4 building blocks of well-being: A systematic review of the empirical literature. J. Posit. Psychol. 2023, 19, 510–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vera, M. Meaning of the quality of life of the elderly for themselves and their family. Ann. Fac. Med. 2007, 68, 284–290. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-55832007000300012 (accessed on 13 February 2025). [CrossRef]
- Producers Market. Coop Business School & Producers Trust. Available online: https://producersmarket.com/es/organization/coop-business-school-producers-trust-882d0d115bf14464b4772223b5c93718 (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Hernández, R.; Mendoza, C. Research Methodology: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Quispe, A. Entrepreneurial Capacity and Business Model Generation in Administration Students of a National University of Apurímac, 2021. Master’s Thesis, César Vallejo University, Peru, Lima, 2022. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/86356/Quispe_HA-SD.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- López Torres, V.G.; Sánchez Tovar, Y.; Moreno Moreno, L.R.; Pérez Rivas, D.A. Determinantes de la intención emprendedora en estudiantes universitarios mexicanos. Rev. Cienc. Soc. 2021, 27, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Legua, C.; del Rosario, M. Entrepreneurial Skills to Develop the Entrepreneurial Spirit in 4th Grade Secondary Students of IE 20167, Cañete-2021. Master’s Thesis, César Vallejo University, Lima, Peru, 2021. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/68368/Calagua_LMDR-SD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Vásquez, G.; del Carmen, Y. Management of the Monitoring and Capacity Development Subsystem in Inclusive Rural Enterprises, Project Noa Jayatai FONCODES UT TARAPOTO, 2022. Master’s Thesis, César Vallejo University, Lima, Peru, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Vargas, J. Construction of a Business Model Under the Canvas Methodology in the Los Andes Savings and Credit Cooperative. Master’s Thesis, César Vallejo University, Lima, Peru, 2022. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/105335/Vargas_AJA-SD.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Barrientos, O.; Domínguez, Y. Entrepreneurial Capacity and Emotional Intelligence in Entrepreneurial Adults in the City of Piura, 2021. Master’s Thesis, César Vallejo University, Lima, Peru, 2022. Available online: https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12692/87499/Barrientos_GOCM-Domínguez_RYR-SD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 13 February 2025).
- Valdez-Juárez, L.; Pérez-De-Lema, D. Creativity and the family environment, facilitators of self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions in university students: Case ITSON Mexico. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2023, 21, 100764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santa-Maria, T.; Vermeulen, W.; Baumgartner, R. Framing and assessing the emergent field of business model innovation for the circular economy: A combined literature review and multiple case study approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 872–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Vladimirova, D.; Evans, S. Sustainable Business Model Innovation: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariuxy, H.; Rodríguez, G. The learning community in the development of entrepreneurial capacities. Sinapsis 2022, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joyce, A.; Paquin, R. The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 1474–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casadesus-Masanell, R.; Ricart, J.E. From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 195–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latifi, M.; Nikou, S.; Bouwman, H. Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs. Technovation 2021, 107, 102274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teruel-Sánchez, R.; Briones-Peñalver, A.; Bernal-Conesa, J.; De Nieves-Nieto, C. Influence of the entrepreneur’s capacity in business performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 2453–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shepherd, D.; Souitaris, V.; Gruber, M. Creating New Ventures: A Review and Research Agenda. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 11–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karami, M.; Read, S. Co-creative entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2021, 36, 106125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ephrem, A.; Nguezet, P.; Charmant, I.; Murimbika, M.; Awotide, B.; Tahirou, A.; Lydie, M.; Manyong, V. Entrepreneurial Motivation, Psychological Capital, and Business Success of Young Entrepreneurs in the DRC. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zemlyak, S.; Gusarova, O.; Khromenkova, G. Entrepreneurial Initiatives, Education and Culture: Hubs for Enterprise Innovations and Economic Development. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradley, S.; Kim, P.; Klein, P.; McMullen, J.; Wennberg, K. Policy for innovative entrepreneurship: Institutions, interventions, and societal challenges. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2021, 15, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figueiredo, B.; Aleti, T.; Martin, D.; Reid, M.; Sheahan, J.; Hjorth, L. Commentary: Strength-based co-design that EMPOWERs—Lessons from codesigning with older adults. J. Serv. Mark. 2023, 37, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, M.; Tucker, R. The entrepreneurial mindset and poverty. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2021, 61, 102–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njegovan, B.; Vukadinović, M.; Šiđanin, I.; Bunčić, S.; Njegovan, M. Optimistic Belief in One’s Own Capableness as a Factor of Entrepreneurial Sustainability: The Assessments of Self-Efficacy from the Perspective of Serbian Entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, S.; Zhou, Y. How Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Promotes Part-Time Entrepreneurial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Resources. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asad, M.; Sulaiman, M.A.; Awain, A.M.; Alsoud, M.; Allam, Z.; Asif, M.U. Green entrepreneurial leadership, and performance of entrepreneurial firms: Does green product innovation mediates? Cogent Bus. Manag. 2024, 11, 2355685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allam, Z.; George, S.; Yahia, A.K.; Salim, A.S.; Ali, N. A Bibliometric Review of Psychological Contract Breach Studies in India from 2011 to 2023. In Proceedings of the ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS), Manama, Bahrain, 28–29 January 2024; pp. 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Typology | Category | Department | Venture |
---|---|---|---|
Crafts and Manufactures | Individual | San Martín | Clay Handicrafts |
Ancash | Handicrafts manufacturing | ||
Cajamarca | Straw Crafts | ||
Group | Madre de Dios | Elaboration of handicrafts using ancestral methods | |
Piura | Silver filigree | ||
Ancash | Wooden Utensils | ||
Crops | Individual | Huanuco | Ornamental plants |
Amazon | Production and sale of pitahaya | ||
Amazon | Vegetable cultivation with Ausangate waters | ||
Group | La Libertad | Sowing, harvesting, and sale of gladioli | |
Apurimac | Sale of medicinal plants | ||
Moquegua | Production and sale of prickly pears | ||
Animal Breeding | Individual | Ica | Guinea pig breeding |
San Martín | Cross-cultural food transfer | ||
Moquegua | Bee breeding and honey sales | ||
Group | La Libertad | Raising laying hens | |
Cusco | Guinea pig breeding | ||
Huanuco | Guinea pig breeding | ||
Processed and Consumer Products | Individual | La Libertad | Production and sale of quince juices, jams, and liquors |
Madre de Dios | Sale of dry cocoa beans | ||
Puno | Nutraceutical nectar made from Andean products in Pomata-Puno | ||
Group | Pasco | Production and marketing of natural essences of eucalyptus oil “San Miguel” | |
Puno | Production and marketing of cheese and dairy products | ||
Junín | Mazamari Entrepreneurs Association |
Variables | Operational Definition | Dimensions | Indicators | Measuring Scale |
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable 1 Business Model | The business model variable will be measured by a questionnaire with Likert-type scale alternatives. | Market segment | Groups of people | (1) Never (2) Almost never (3) Sometimes (4) Almost always (5) Always |
Satisfaction | ||||
Value proposition | Troubleshooting | |||
Needs | ||||
Service channels | Providing information | |||
Value proposition | ||||
After sales | ||||
Customer relations | Customer training | |||
Customer loyalty | ||||
Customer experience | ||||
Revenue sources | Cash flow | |||
Key resources | Physical Resources | |||
Financial resources | ||||
Human or intellectual resources | ||||
Key Activities | Value proposition | |||
Customer relations | ||||
Contact platform | ||||
Key partnerships | Key partners | |||
Key suppliers | ||||
Cost structures | Fixed costs | |||
Variable costs | ||||
Variable 2 Entrepreneurial skills | The entrepreneurial capabilities variable will be measured by a questionnaire with Likert-type scale alternatives. | Self-confidence | Skills | (1) Never (2) Almost never (3) Sometimes (4) Almost always (5) Always |
Preparation | ||||
Decision making | ||||
Difficulties | ||||
Creativity | Imagination | |||
Troubleshooting | ||||
Adaptability to change | ||||
Initiative | Independent | |||
Challenges | ||||
Perseverance | Effort | |||
Motivation | ||||
Failure | ||||
Teamwork | Delegate | |||
Empathy |
Variables | Dimensions | Indicators | Items |
---|---|---|---|
Variable 1 Business Model | Market segment | Groups of people | 1. You believe that by segmenting the market, you identify your customers as the most important in your venture. |
Satisfaction | 2. You believe that by segmenting the market, you will increase customer satisfaction by segmenting your customers according to their needs, behaviors, and attributes. | ||
Value proposition | Troubleshooting | 3. Believe you with the value proposition, you will help provide a solution to our customers’ problems. | |
Needs | 4. Create the value proposition that will help you meet your customers’ needs. | ||
Service channels | Providing information | 5. Do you believe that the service channels make your customers aware of your products or services? | |
Value proposition | 6. Do you believe that the service channels provide an opportunity for customers to evaluate the value proposition of your company? | ||
After sales | 7. Do you believe that your customer service channels provide your customers with personalized after-sales service? | ||
Customer relations | Customer training | 8. You believe that customer relationships are based on customer acquisition strategies. | |
Customer loyalty | 9. You believe that customer relationships are based on loyalty strategies. | ||
Customer experience | 10. You believe that customer relationships are based on global experiences. | ||
Revenue sources | Cash flow | 11. Are you familiar with the concept of benefits? | |
12. Are you familiar with the concept of expenses? | |||
13. Are you familiar with the concept of income? | |||
Key resources | Physical Resources | 14. Knows the concept of physical assets such as “manufacturing facilities, buildings, vehicles, machines, systems, points of sale and distribution networks”. | |
Financial resources | 15. You believe that one of the key resources are economic guarantees, such as cash, lines of credit. | ||
Human or intellectual resources | 16. You believe that a key resource is creative people, with a high level of knowledge vital to a company. | ||
Key Activities | Value proposition | 17. You believe the value proposition will help improve production. | |
Customer relations | 18. Create relationships with customers will help improve production. | ||
Contact platform | 19. You believe that the platform of contacts, networking, software, and branding will help increase revenue. | ||
20. You believe that the platform of contacts, networks, software, and brands will help improve the efficiency of distribution channels. | |||
Key partnerships | Key partners | 21. Do you believe that having key partners helps to optimize the resources of the company or venture? | |
22. Do you believe that having key partners helps to optimize the activities of the company or venture? | |||
Key suppliers | 23. Do you believe that having key suppliers contributes to optimizing the resources of the company or enterprise? | ||
24. Do you believe that having key suppliers contributes to optimize the activities of the company or enterprise? | |||
Cost structures | Fixed costs | 25. Are you familiar with the concept of fixed costs? | |
Variable costs | 26. Are you familiar with the concept of variable costs? | ||
Variable 2 Entrepreneurial skills | Self-confidence | Skills | 1. I am aware of my abilities and I demonstrate them. |
Preparation | 2. He considers that his knowledge requires constant development and preparation. | ||
Decision making | 3. You make decisions without delay when necessary (you do not leave for tomorrow what has to be solved at the moment). | ||
Difficulties | 4. Frequently faces problems without being intimidated by possible difficulties. | ||
Creativity | Imagination | 5. He usually takes advantage of his imagination to invent alternatives to solve a problem. | |
Troubleshooting | 6. He frequently visualizes problems that seem to be unidentified or overlooked by others. | ||
Adaptability to change | 7. You are the person who is not afraid of change. | ||
8. You are the person looking for several options to solve a problem. | |||
Initiative | Independent | 9. He considers himself an independent person to make his own decisions. | |
10. You reject suggestions, opinions of other people. | |||
11. You find that you get discouraged easily. | |||
Challenges | 12. You are a person who usually takes on challenges and strives to achieve your goals. | ||
13. You are a person who evaluates several alternatives before making a decision. | |||
Perseverance | Effort | 14. You set your goals and don’t stop until you achieve them. | |
15. You strive to persevere and maintain what you have achieved. | |||
Motivation | 16. You are often motivated and enjoy what you do or perform. | ||
Failure | 17. In general, you believe that the word failure is the end. | ||
Teamwork | Delegate | 18. You feel that you can do things alone and independently without asking others for help. | |
19. Usually, you delegate important activities to your team members. | |||
20. You usually delegate important activities to your team members and collaborate on these tasks. | |||
Empathy | 21. I am a person who treats people well and considers them an important part of your business. | ||
22. I am a person who knows how to listen to suggestions and other people’s opinions. |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 26 to 60 | 36 | 24.66% |
Regular | 61 to 95 | 90 | 61.64% |
Good | 96 to 130 | 20 | 13.70% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 2 to 4 | 51 | 34.93% |
Regular | 5 to 7 | 63 | 43.15% |
Good | 8 to 10 | 32 | 21.92% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 2 to 4 | 55 | 37.67% |
Regular | 5 to 7 | 57 | 39.04% |
Good | 8 to 10 | 34 | 23.29% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 3 to 6 | 56 | 38.36% |
Regular | 7 to 10 | 69 | 47.26% |
Good | 11 to 12 | 21 | 14.38% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 3 to 7 | 55 | 37.67% |
Regular | 7 to 12 | 75 | 51.37% |
Good | 13 to 15 | 16 | 10.96% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 3 to 7 | 58 | 39.73% |
Regular | 7 to 12 | 68 | 46.58% |
Good | 13 to 15 | 20 | 13.70% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 3 to 7 | 55 | 37.67% |
Regular | 7 to 12 | 70 | 47.95% |
Good | 13 to 15 | 21 | 14.38% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 4 to 9 | 45 | 30.82% |
Regular | 10 to 15 | 81 | 55.48% |
Good | 16 to 20 | 20 | 13.70% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 4 to 9 | 46 | 31.51% |
Regular | 10 to 15 | 80 | 54.79% |
Good | 16 to 20 | 20 | 13.70% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 2 to 4 | 56 | 38.36% |
Regular | 5 to 7 | 60 | 41.10% |
Good | 8 to 10 | 30 | 20.55% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 22 to 51 | 37 | 25.34% |
Regular | 52 to 81 | 89 | 60.96% |
Good | 82 to 110 | 20 | 13.70% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 4 to 9 | 52 | 35.62% |
Regular | 10 to 15 | 71 | 48.63% |
Good | 16 to 20 | 23 | 15.75% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 4 to 9 | 46 | 31.51% |
Regular | 10 to 15 | 73 | 50.00% |
Good | 16 to 20 | 27 | 18.49% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 5 to 11 | 42 | 28.77% |
Regular | 12 to 18 | 80 | 54.79% |
Good | 19 to 25 | 24 | 16.44% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 4 to 9 | 45 | 30.82% |
Regular | 10 to 15 | 76 | 52.05% |
Good | 16 to 20 | 25 | 17.12% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Levels | Scale | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Bad | 5 to 11 | 42 | 28.77% |
Regular | 12 to 18 | 77 | 52.74% |
Good | 19 to 25 | 27 | 18.49% |
Total | 146 | 100% |
Kolmogorov–Smirnov a | Shapiro–Wilk | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statistic | df | Sig. | Statistic | df | Sig. | |
Entrepreneurial skills | 0.162 | 146 | 0.000 | 0.899 | 146 | 0.000 |
Business Model | 0.168 | 146 | 0.000 | 0.882 | 146 | 0.000 |
Relationship Type (r) | Range | Relation | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
(+0.10 to +0.24) | Very weak positive correlation | ||
r is 1 direct (positive) | (+0.25 to +0.49) | Weak positive correlation | |
(+0.50 to +0.74) | Average positive correlation | Significant (p-value < 0.0) Highly significant (p-value < 0.01) Not significant (p-value > 0.05) | |
(+0.75 to +0.89) | Strong positive correlation | ||
(+0.90 to +0.99) | Very strong positive correlation | ||
(+1) | Perfect positive correlation | ||
(−0.10 to −0.24) | Very weak negative correlation | ||
r is 1 inverse (negative) | (−0.25 to −0.49) | Weak negative correlation | |
(−0.50 to −0.74) | Average negative correlation | ||
(−0.75 to −0.89) | Strong negative correlation | ||
(−0.90 to −0.99) | Very strong negative correlation | ||
(−1) | Perfect negative correlation |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Business Model | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.755 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Business model | Correlation coefficient | 0.755 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Market Segment | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.728 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Market segment | Correlation coefficient | 0.728 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Value Proposition | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.729 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Value proposition | Correlation coefficient | 0.729 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Service Channels | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.762 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Service channels | Correlation coefficient | 0.762 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Client Relationship | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.733 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Client relationship | Correlation coefficient | 0.733 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Income Sources | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.721 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Income sources | Correlation coefficient | 0.721 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Key Resources | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.701 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Key resources | Correlation coefficient | 0.701 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Key Activities | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.770 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Key activities | Correlation coefficient | 0.770 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Key Partnerships | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.705 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Key partnerships | Correlation coefficient | 0.705 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Entrepreneurial Capabilities | Cost Structure | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Spearman’s Rho | Entrepreneurial capabilities | Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.740 ** |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 | ||
Cost structure | Correlation coefficient | 0.740 ** | 1.000 | |
Sig. (bilateral) | 0.000 | |||
N | 146 | 146 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Moreno-Menéndez, F.M.; Zacarías-Rodríguez, V.E.; Torres-Quillatupa, P.E.; Zacarías-Vallejos, S.R.; Astuñaupa-Flores, S.N.; Barrrionuevo-Inca-Roca, Y.A.; Navarro-Veliz, J.A.; González-Prida, V. The Interplay Between Business Models and Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Aging Populations: Insights from Emerging Economies. World 2025, 6, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020084
Moreno-Menéndez FM, Zacarías-Rodríguez VE, Torres-Quillatupa PE, Zacarías-Vallejos SR, Astuñaupa-Flores SN, Barrrionuevo-Inca-Roca YA, Navarro-Veliz JA, González-Prida V. The Interplay Between Business Models and Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Aging Populations: Insights from Emerging Economies. World. 2025; 6(2):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020084
Chicago/Turabian StyleMoreno-Menéndez, Fabricio Miguel, Victoriano Eusebio Zacarías-Rodríguez, Pedro Emil Torres-Quillatupa, Sara Ricardina Zacarías-Vallejos, Saúl Nilo Astuñaupa-Flores, Yamill Alam Barrrionuevo-Inca-Roca, Javier Amador Navarro-Veliz, and Vicente González-Prida. 2025. "The Interplay Between Business Models and Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Aging Populations: Insights from Emerging Economies" World 6, no. 2: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020084
APA StyleMoreno-Menéndez, F. M., Zacarías-Rodríguez, V. E., Torres-Quillatupa, P. E., Zacarías-Vallejos, S. R., Astuñaupa-Flores, S. N., Barrrionuevo-Inca-Roca, Y. A., Navarro-Veliz, J. A., & González-Prida, V. (2025). The Interplay Between Business Models and Entrepreneurial Capabilities in Aging Populations: Insights from Emerging Economies. World, 6(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020084