Next Article in Journal
Network Data Maps on Entrepreneurial Intention, Unicorns, and Human Flourishing on the SCOPUS Database: A Visual Analysis Using VOSviewer
Previous Article in Journal
Discussing EU Policies and Mechanisms towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: A Case Study of Greece
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education

by
Sabine O’Hara
1,* and
Sigamoney Naicker
2
1
College of Agriculture, Urban Sustainability and Environmental Sciences (CAUSES), University of the District of Columbia, Washington, DC 20008, USA
2
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World 2022, 3(4), 783-801; https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040044
Submission received: 25 July 2022 / Revised: 14 September 2022 / Accepted: 15 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022

Abstract

Universities play a crucial role in building the economic development capacity for their communities and regions. Their capacity building role is typically defined by contributions to the economic bottom line of the community and region where a university is located. This kind of capacity building may find itself in conflict with the long-term sustainable development needs of the region and with the responsibility of the university itself. Sustainable capacity building may require strategies that focus on the specific social, cultural, environmental, and physical context of a university’s location beyond purely economic capacity goals. To achieve sustainable development outcomes, universities must advance an understanding of the context conditions within which they are located. At least three context systems are relevant to this view of development: the economy, society and culture, and the environment with its physical, biological, and ecological context conditions. Each of these context systems is characterized by distinct time frames, spatial configurations, rules, and success measures. A focus on economic development outcomes reflects only one subsystem’s rules, behaviors, and success measures. By analyzing two case study examples from the United States and South Africa, we offer a framework for universities to advance sustainability objectives that correspond to their broader responsibilities. We argue that in order to meet these broader responsibilities, universities must first commit to giving expression to their own local context through the voices and lived realities of students and residents. Since universities build the brain trust of communities and regions around the world, they play an essential role in strengthening global sustainability goals by building the local capacity of their communities and regions.
Keywords: capacity building; social-cultural context; environmental-physical context; sustainable development; local expertise; heutagogy capacity building; social-cultural context; environmental-physical context; sustainable development; local expertise; heutagogy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

O’Hara, S.; Naicker, S. Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education. World 2022, 3, 783-801. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040044

AMA Style

O’Hara S, Naicker S. Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education. World. 2022; 3(4):783-801. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040044

Chicago/Turabian Style

O’Hara, Sabine, and Sigamoney Naicker. 2022. "Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education" World 3, no. 4: 783-801. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040044

APA Style

O’Hara, S., & Naicker, S. (2022). Local Commitment and Global Reach: Advancing Sustainable Capacity Building in Higher Education. World, 3(4), 783-801. https://doi.org/10.3390/world3040044

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop