Previous Article in Journal
LGSIK-Poser: Skeleton-Aware Full-Body Motion Reconstruction from Sparse Inputs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimization and Performance Comparison of AOD-Net and DehazeFormer Dehazing Algorithms

School of Computer and Cyberspace Security, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
AI 2025, 6(8), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080181 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 June 2025 / Revised: 17 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 7 August 2025

Abstract

Image dehazing is an effective approach for enhancing the quality of images captured under foggy or hazy conditions. Although existing methods have achieved certain success in dehazing performance, many rely on deep network architectures, leading to high model complexity and computational costs. To address this issue, this study aims to compare and optimize existing algorithms to improve dehazing performance. For this purpose, we innovatively propose a multi-scale feature-coordinated composite loss mechanism, integrating perceptual loss, Mean Squared Error, and L1 regularization to optimize two dehazing methods: AOD-Net and DehazeFormer. Extensive experiments demonstrate significant performance improvements under the multi-objective loss mechanism. For AOD-Net, the PSNR increased by 22.40% (+4.17 dB), SSIM by 3.62% (+0.0318), VSNR by 43% (+1.54 dB), and LPIPS decreased by 56.30% (−0.1161). Similarly, DehazeFormer showed notable enhancements: the PSNR improved by 11.43% (+2.45 dB), SSIM by 0.8% (+0.008), VSNR by 2.6% (+0.23 dB), and LPIPS decreased by 5.5% (−0.0104). These results fully validate the effectiveness of the composite loss mechanism in enhancing the feature representation capability of the models.
Keywords: deep learning; transformer; image dehazing; attention mechanism deep learning; transformer; image dehazing; attention mechanism

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Wang, J.; Pan, Y. Optimization and Performance Comparison of AOD-Net and DehazeFormer Dehazing Algorithms. AI 2025, 6, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080181

AMA Style

Liu F, Wang J, Pan Y. Optimization and Performance Comparison of AOD-Net and DehazeFormer Dehazing Algorithms. AI. 2025; 6(8):181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Futing, Jingtao Wang, and Yun Pan. 2025. "Optimization and Performance Comparison of AOD-Net and DehazeFormer Dehazing Algorithms" AI 6, no. 8: 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080181

APA Style

Liu, F., Wang, J., & Pan, Y. (2025). Optimization and Performance Comparison of AOD-Net and DehazeFormer Dehazing Algorithms. AI, 6(8), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6080181

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop