Traditional Removable Partial Dentures versus Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective, Observational Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Population
4.2. Study Design
4.3. OHRQoL Measurement
4.4. Ethical Consideration
4.5. Statistical Analysis
4.5.1. Sample Size Calculation
4.5.2. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Al-Rafee, M.A. The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: A literature Review. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2020, 9, 1841–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milona, M.; Janiszewska-Olszowska, J.; Szmidt, M.; Kłoda, K.; Olszowski, T. Oral Health Related Behaviors in Relation to DMFT Indexes of Teenagers in an Urban Area of North-West Poland-Dental Caries Is Still a Common Problem. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Addazio, G.; Santilli, M.; Sinjari, B.; Xhajanka, E.; Rexhepi, I.; Mangifesta, R.; Caputi, S. Access to Dental Care-A Survey from Dentists, People with Disabilities and Caregivers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, L.F. The current and future treatment of edentulism. J. Prosthodont. 2009, 18, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordenram, G.; Davidson, T.; Gynther, G.; Helgesson, G.; Hultin, M.; Jemt, T.; Lekholm, U.; Nilner, K.; Norlund, A.; Rohlin, M.; et al. Qualitative studies of patients’ perceptions of loss of teeth, the edentulous state and prosthetic rehabilitation: A systematic review with meta-synthesis. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2013, 71, 937–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomason, J.M.; Heydecke, G.; Feine, J.S.; Ellis, J.S. How do patients perceive the benefit of reconstructive dentistry with regard to oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2008, 19, 326–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bassi, F.; Carr, A.; Chang, T.L.; Estafanous, E.; Garrett, N.; Happonen, R.P.; Koka, S.; Laine, J.; Osswald, M.; Reintsema, H.; et al. Psychologic Outcomes in Implant Prosthodontics. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2013, 26, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Papi, P.; Giardino, R.; Sassano, P.; Amodeo, G.; Pompa, G.; Cascone, P. Oral health related quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients rehabilitated with conventional prostheses or dental implants. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2015, 5, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lang, N.P.; Zitzmann, N.U. Working Group 3 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical research in implant dentistry: Evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2012, 39, 133–138. [Google Scholar]
- Papi, P.; Di Carlo, S.; Mencio, F.; Rosella, D.; De Angelis, F.; Pompa, G. Dental Implants Placed in Patients with Mechanical Risk Factors: A Long-term Follow-up Retrospective Study. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2017, 7, S48–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Berglundh, T.; Persson, L.; Klinge, L. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2002, 29, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.J. Revisiting the Removable Partial Denture. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 63, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leles, C.R.; Martins, R.R.; Silva, E.T.; Nunes, M.F. Discriminant analysis of patients’ reasons for choosing or refusing treatments for partial edentulism. J. Oral Rehabil. 2009, 36, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hummel, S.K.; Wilson, M.A.; Marker, V.A.; Nunn, M.E. Quality of removable partial dentures worn by the adult U.S. population. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2002, 88, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeulen, A.H.; Keltjens, H.M.; van’t Hof, M.A.; Kayser, A.F. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: Survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1996, 76, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wetherell, J.D.; Smales, R.J. Partial denture failures: A long-term clinical survey. J. Dent. 1980, 8, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Ramos, V., Jr.; Bratos, M.; Liu, P.P.; He, W. Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zancopé, K.; Abrão, G.M.; Karam, F.K.; Neves, F.D. Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2015, 113, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufmann, R.; Friedli, M.; Hug, S.; Mericske- Stern, R. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2009, 22, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gates, W.D., III.; Cooper, L.F.; Sanders, A.E.; Reside, G.J.; De Kok, I.J. The effect of implant-supported removable partial dentures on oral health quality of life. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2014, 25, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Eekeren, P.J.; Aartman, I.H.; Tahmaseb, A.; Wismeijer, D. The effect of implant placement in patients with either Kennedy class II and III on oral health-related quality of life: A prospective clinical trial. J. Oral Rehabil. 2016, 43, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Locker, D. Health outcomes of oral disorders. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 24, S85–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slade, G.D.; Spencer, A.J. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent. Health 1994, 11, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
- Slade, G.D. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1997, 25, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Lucena, S.C.; Gomes, G.F.; Da Silva, W.J.; Del Bel Cury, A.A. Patients’ satisfaction and functional assessment of existing complete dentures: Correlation with objective masticatory function. J. Oral Rehabil. 2011, 38, 440–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gargallo-Albiol, J.; Tavelli, L.; Barootchi, S.; Monje, A.; Wang, H.L. Clinical sequelae and patients’ perception of dental implant removal: A cross-sectional study. J. Periodontol. 2021, 92, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Osta, N.; Haddad, E.; Fakhouri, J.; Saad, R.; El Osta, L. Comparison of psychometric properties of GOHAI, OHIP-14, and OHIP-EDENT as measures of oral health in complete edentulous patients aged 60 years and more. Qual. Life Res. 2021, 30, 1199–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gerritsen, A.E.; Allen, P.F.; Witter, D.J.; Bronkhorst, E.M.; Creugers, N.H.J. Tooth loss and oral health related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2010, 8, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mozhdeh, M.; Caroccia, F.; Moscagiuri, F.; Festa, F.; D’Attilio, M. Evaluation of Knowledge among Dentists on Symptoms and Treatments of Temporomandibular Disorders in Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bramanti, E.; Matacena, G.; Cecchetti, F.; Arcuri, C.; Cicciù, M. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients before and after implant therapy: A 2-year longitudinal study. Oral Implant. 2013, 6, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özhayat, E.B.; Gotfredsen, K.E. Effect of treatment with fixed and removable dental prostheses. An oral health-related quality of life study. J. Oral Rehabil. 2012, 39, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brennan, M.; Houston, F.; O’Sullivan, M.O.B. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2010, 25, 791–800. [Google Scholar]
- Swelem, A.A.; Gurevich, K.F.K. Oral health-related quality of life in partially edentulous patients treated with removable, fixed, fixed-removable, and implant-supported prostheses. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2014, 24, 338–347. [Google Scholar]
- Sinjari, B.; Rexhepi, I.; Santilli, M.; D’Addazio, G.; Chiacchiaretta, P.; Di Carlo, P.; Caputi, S. The Impact of COVID-19 Related Lockdown on Dental Practice in Central Italy-Outcomes of A Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mumcu, E.; Bilhan, H.; Geckili, O. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers. Gerodontolgy 2012, 29, e618–e623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berretin-Felix, G.; Filho, H.N.; Padovani, C.R.; Machado, W.M. A longitudinal study of quality of life of elderly with mandibular implant- supported fixed prostheses. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008, 19, 704–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petricevic, N.; Celebic, A.; Rener-Sitar, K. A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology 2012, 29, c956–c963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, M.T.; Slade, G.D.; Szentpetery, A.; Setz, J.M. Oral health–related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004, 17, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visscher, C.M.; Lobbezoo, F.; Schuller, A.A. Dental status and oral health-related quality of life. A population-based study. J. Oral Rehabil. 2014, 41, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szentpetery, A.G.; John, M.T.; Slade, G.D.; Setz, J.M. Problems reported by patients before and after prosthodontic treatment. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2005, 18, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfart, S.; Weyer, N.; Kern, M. Patient attendance in a recall program after prosthodontic rehabilitation: A 5-year follow-up. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2012, 25, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Wu, J.H.; Yang, Y.H.; Wang, C.H.; Lee, H.E.; Du, J.K. Effects of denture maintenance on satisfaction levels of Taiwanese elderly using removable partial dentures: A pilot study. Gerodontology 2012, 29, e458–e463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bae, K.H.; Kim, C.; Paik, D.I.; Kim, J.B. A comparison of oral health related quality of life between complete and partial removable denture-wearing older adults in Korea. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Papagiannopoulou, V.; Oulis, C.J.; Papaioannou, W.; Antonogeorgos, G.; Yfantopoulos, J. Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use among adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- John, M.T.; Reissmann, D.R.; Szentp_etery, A.; Steele, J. An approach to define clinical significance in prosthodontics. J. Prosthodont. 2009, 18, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghinassi, B.; D’Addazio, G.; Di Baldassarre, A.; Femminella, B.; Di Vincenzo, G.; Piattelli, M.; Gaggi, G.; Sinjari, B. Immunohistochemical Results of Soft tissues Around a New Implant Healing-Abutment Surface: A Human Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scarano, A.; Murmura, G.; Sinjiari, B.; Sollazzo, V.; Spinelli, G.; Carinci, F. Analysis and structural examination of screw loosening in oral implants. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharm. 2011, 24, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, S.D.; Cooper, L.; Craddock, H.; Hyde, T.P.; Nattress, B.; Pavitt, S.H.; Seymour, D.W. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017, 118, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sample Size Calculator. Available online: https://clincalc.com/stats/samplesize.aspx (accessed on 10 May 2021).
n | % | |
---|---|---|
Mean age | 73 | |
Sex (men) | 8 | 40% |
Sex (women) | 12 | 60% |
Kennedy class I | 11 | 55% |
Kennedy class II | 6 | 30% |
Kennedy class III | 3 | 15% |
Kennedy class IV | 0 | 0% |
Patients | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Difference T2-T1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
Domain 1—functional limitation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | −1 |
Domain 2—physical pain | −2 | 1 | −2 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | −2 | −3 | −2 | 0 | 0 | −3 | 0 | −3 | −3 | 0 | −1 | −3 | −2 |
Domain 3—psychological discomfort | −4 | −2 | −1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | −2 | −4 | −3 | 1 | −3 | −1 | −4 | 0 | −3 | −4 | 1 | 0 | −3 | −3 |
Domain 4—physical disability | −3 | −1 | −2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | −2 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −2 | 0 | −2 | −1 | −3 | 0 | −2 | −1 | 0 |
Domain 5—psychological disability | −2 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | −2 | −4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −4 | −3 | 1 | −1 | −2 | −3 |
Domain 6—social disability | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −2 | −2 | −1 | −2 | 0 | −2 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | −2 |
Domain 7—handicap | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 |
Total | −11 | −3 | −6 | −1 | −6 | 0 | −4 | −10 | −15 | −4 | −5 | −6 | −8 | −4 | −15 | −15 | 2 | −5 | −13 | −11 |
Statistical Analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Difference T2–T1 | Median Differences | First Quartiles | Third Quartiles | p Value |
Domain 1—functional limitation | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0.021 |
Domain 2—physical pain | −1.5 | −2.25 | 0 | 0.002 |
Domain 3—psychological discomfort | −2 | −3 | −0.75 | 0.001 |
Domain 4—physical disability | −1 | −2 | 0 | 0.001 |
Domain 5—psychological disability | −1 | −2 | 0 | 0.001 |
Domain 6—social disability | −1 | −2 | 0 | 0.002 |
Domain 7—handicap | 0 | −0.25 | 0 | 0.025 |
Total | −6 | −11 | −4 | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
D’Addazio, G.; Xhajanka, E.; Cerone, P.; Santilli, M.; Rexhepi, I.; Caputi, S.; Sinjari, B. Traditional Removable Partial Dentures versus Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective, Observational Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life Study. Prosthesis 2021, 3, 361-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3040032
D’Addazio G, Xhajanka E, Cerone P, Santilli M, Rexhepi I, Caputi S, Sinjari B. Traditional Removable Partial Dentures versus Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective, Observational Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life Study. Prosthesis. 2021; 3(4):361-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3040032
Chicago/Turabian StyleD’Addazio, Gianmaria, Edit Xhajanka, Paolo Cerone, Manlio Santilli, Imena Rexhepi, Sergio Caputi, and Bruna Sinjari. 2021. "Traditional Removable Partial Dentures versus Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective, Observational Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life Study" Prosthesis 3, no. 4: 361-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3040032
APA StyleD’Addazio, G., Xhajanka, E., Cerone, P., Santilli, M., Rexhepi, I., Caputi, S., & Sinjari, B. (2021). Traditional Removable Partial Dentures versus Implant-Supported Removable Partial Dentures: A Retrospective, Observational Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life Study. Prosthesis, 3(4), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis3040032