# Sharing Nonfungible Information Requires Shared Nonfungible Information

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. System Identification Formalism

## 3. Fungible Information Is Insufficient for System Identification

**Theorem**

**1.**

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Proof of Lemma 1.**

**Proof of Theorem 1.**

**Example**

**1.**

**Example**

**2.**

**Example**

**3.**

## 4. Implemented System Identification Operators Are Nonfungible

**Theorem**

**2.**

**Proof.**

## 5. Uncertainty about Operator Sharing Induces Decoherence

## 6. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

QRF | Quantum reference frame |

## References

- Bartlett, S.D.; Rudolph, T.; Spekkens, R.W. Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**2007**, 79, 555–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aharonov, Y.; Kaufherr, T. Quantum frames of reference. Phys. Rev. D
**1984**, 30, 368–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Angelo, R.M.; Brunner, N.; Popescu, S.; Short, A.J.; Skrzypczyk, P. Physics within a quantum reference frame. J. Phys. A
**2011**, 44, 145304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fields, C. Some consequences of the thermodynamic cost of system identification. Entropy
**2018**, 20, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bohr, N. Causality and complementarity. Philos. Sci.
**1937**, 4, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wheeler, J.A. Law without law. In Quantum Theory and Measurement; Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H., Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1983; pp. 182–213. [Google Scholar]
- Landauer, R. Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Devel.
**1961**, 5, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grinbaum, A. How device-independent approaches change the meaning of physical theory. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.
**2017**, 58, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tegmark, M. How unitary cosmology generalizes thermodynamics and solves the inflationary entropy problem. Phys. Rev. D
**2012**, 85, 123517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fields, C. Decoherence as a sequence of entanglement swaps. Results Phys.
**2019**, 12, 1888–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zurek, W.H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**2003**, 75, 715–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Moore, E.F. Gedankenexperiments on sequential machines. In Autonoma Studies; Shannon, C.W., McCarthy, J., Eds.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1956; pp. 129–155. [Google Scholar]
- Vazirani, U.; Vidick, T. Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2014**, 113, 140501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Situ, H.; Qiu, D.W. Investigating the implementation of restricted sets of multiqubit operations on distant qubits: A communication complexity perspective. Quant. Inform. Process.
**2011**, 10, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zou, X.; Qiu, D.W. Three-step semiquantum secure direct communication protocol. Sci. China G
**2014**, 57, 1696–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Qiu, D.W.; Li, L.; Mateus, P.; Sernadas, A. Exponentially more concise quantum recognition of non-RMM regular languages. J. Comp. Syst. Sci.
**2015**, 81, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Landauer, R. Information is a physical entity. Phys. A
**1999**, 263, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tipler, F.J. Quantum nonlocality does not exist. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
**2014**, 111, 11281–11286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Blume-Kohout, R.; Zurek, W.H. Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information. Phys. Rev. A
**2006**, 73, 062310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zurek, W.H. Quantum Darwinism. Nat. Phys.
**2009**, 5, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fields, C. Quantum Darwinism requires an extra-theoretical assumption of encoding redundancy. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**2010**, 49, 2523–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]

**Figure 1.**Alice sends distant Bob a fungible encoding of her observational outcomes and a nonfungible token (dashed lines) of her local Cartesian frame. Both Alice and Bob must identify the same token for the sharing protocol to be successfully executed.

**Figure 2.**Alice and Bob each cycle through identifying ($\{{M}_{j}^{Xk}\}$ and $\{{M}_{j}^{Yk}\}$) and then determining the pointer state of ($\{{M}_{l}^{Pk}\}$ and $\{{M}_{l}^{Qk}\}$) their shared (${X}_{k}$) and local (${Y}_{k}$) Cartesian frames.

**Figure 3.**Quantum Darwinism [19,20]: Observers k interact with disjoint partitions ${E}^{k}$ of the environment E of S, each of which encodes the eigenvalues of ${H}_{SE}$. Redundancy of encoding and hence agreement among the observers k clearly requires that ${H}_{SE}$ be independent of the partitioning of E into the ${E}^{k}$.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Fields, C.; Marcianò, A.
Sharing Nonfungible Information Requires Shared Nonfungible Information. *Quantum Rep.* **2019**, *1*, 252-259.
https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum1020022

**AMA Style**

Fields C, Marcianò A.
Sharing Nonfungible Information Requires Shared Nonfungible Information. *Quantum Reports*. 2019; 1(2):252-259.
https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum1020022

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Fields, Chris, and Antonino Marcianò.
2019. "Sharing Nonfungible Information Requires Shared Nonfungible Information" *Quantum Reports* 1, no. 2: 252-259.
https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum1020022