Next Article in Journal
Inline Particle Size Analysis during Technical-Scale Processing of a Fermented Concentrated Milk Protein-Based Microgel Dispersion: Feasibility as a Process Control
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Low-Temperature Inactivation of Protease AprX from Pseudomonas on Its Proteolytic Capacity and Specificity: A Peptidomic Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Dairy
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/dairy4010012
dairy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study of Milk Composition and Coagulation Properties of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Their Cross Milked Once or Twice a Day

by
Inthujaa Sanjayaranj
1,2,*,
Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos
1,
Hugh T. Blair
1,
Patrick W. M. Janssen
3,
Stephen E. Holroyd
4 and
Alastair K. H. MacGibbon
4
1
Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
2
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Eastern University, Chenkaladi 30350, Sri Lanka
3
School of Food and Advanced Technology, Massey University, Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
4
Fonterra Research and Development Centre, Private Bag 11029, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dairy 2023, 4(1), 167-179; https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4010012
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 1 February 2023 / Published: 9 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Milk Processing)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of the study was to explore the effect of breed on the composition and coagulation properties (rennet coagulation time (min), curd firming rate (min), and curd firmness (mm)) of milk from cows milked once a day or twice a day in the morning and afternoon, using a Formagraph. Thirty cows (11 Holstein-Friesian, 8 Holstein-Friesian × Jersey cross, and 11 Jersey) from a once-a-day milking herd and thirty cows (16 Holstein-Friesian, 10 Holstein-Friesian × Jersey cross, and 4 Jersey) from a twice-a-day milking herd were sampled in late lactation. The milk composition and coagulation properties were analysed for each milk sample. Jersey cows had better milk coagulation properties at each milking frequency-milking time compared to Holstein-Friesian cows. Curd firmness 30 min after the addition of rennet was positively (p < 0.05) correlated with the protein concentration. However, the correlations were inconsistent between milking frequencies and milking times, resulting in poor prediction of the changes in cheese-making potential. This study indicated that milk composition and coagulation properties were affected by breed and milking frequency. The effect of the breed could be due to the variation in the composition of the milk, but firm recommendations were hampered by a low number of samples. Further research with larger cow numbers is justified.

1. Introduction

New Zealand farmers traditionally milk their cows twice a day (TAD). However, since the late 1990s, the interest in once-a-day (OAD) milking has grown [1] due to several benefits: reduced labour, managemen, and feed cost, improved labour efficiency, cow health and reproductive performance, and the creation of alternative employment options for farmers [2,3,4]. However, OAD milking reduces milk production, which leads to economic uncertainty [3]. Once-a-day milking also modifies the milk composition, with higher concentrations of fat and protein, and lower concentrations of lactose compared to TAD milking [5,6].
Milk coagulation properties (MCPs) are measures of milk processability for cheese making. Typical MCPs are rennet coagulation time (RCT, min), curd firming time or time taken to form 20 mm depth curd (K20, min), and curd firmness 30 min after rennet addition (A30, mm) using a Formagraph. The MCP methodology has been reviewed by Troch et al. [7]. In cheese production, milk that aggregates quickly (low RCT) and forms a firm curd soon after the addition of the clotting enzyme (low K20 and high A30 values) is desirable.
Milk composition affects the yield and quality of dairy products [8]. Milk coagulation properties are crucial factors and basic requirements for cheese making [9]. Fat and protein are the most important milk solids that affect MCPs. Milk protein contributes to the functional properties of coagulation such as gel formation, curd formation, ion binding, and emulsifying ability [8]. Casein is the most important protein component affecting the coagulation properties of milk. Generally, milk with a higher ratio of casein to whey protein is highly suitable for cheese-making [10]. A higher concentration of calcium ions in milk also leads to good quality cheese, aggregating para-casein micelles by reducing the surface charges [10,11].
Selecting breeds that produce milk more suitable for manufacturing dairy products is one way to manipulate milk processing properties [12]. Milk from Jersey cows has higher concentrations of fat and protein in both OAD and TAD milking frequencies [12,13]. There are studies in New Zealand reporting the effect of breed on milk composition and MCPs in cows milked with TAD [12,14] and international studies reporting the effect of gross composition on the coagulation characteristic of OAD milk [15,16,17]. However, no studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of breed on the composition and coagulation properties of milk from cows milked OAD and TAD with different milking times. Studies have also reported differences in the composition of morning and afternoon milking [18,19], which could also affect the MCPs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of breed on the composition and coagulation properties of milk from cows milked OAD and TAD with different milking times.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Management and Feeding

This study was conducted at the No. 1 Dairy farm and No. 4 Dairy farm of Massey University, Palmerston North during the 2020–2021 production season. The No. 1 Dairy farm is managed as a low input system with cows milked OAD, and the No. 4 Dairy farm is managed as a high input system with cows milked TAD. The details of farm and milking frequencies have previously been given in detail by Sanjayaranj et al. [20]. The feed composition and chemical composition of the feed given in the production season are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Milk Sampling

Milk samples were collected from 30 cows (11 Holstein-Friesian (F), 8 Holstein-Friesian × Jersey cross (F × J), and 11 Jersey (J)) from an OAD milking herd and 30 cows (16 F, 10 F × J, and 4 J) from a TAD milking herd during late lactation (229 ± 13 days in milk) in the 2020–2021 production season. The sampled cows from each No.1 Dairy farm and No.4 Dairy farm contained 15 first parity and 15 second parity cows and had no clinical mastitis or metabolic diseases. Morning milk samples were collected from the OAD herd, and morning and evening milk samples were collected from the TAD herd separately. Composite milk samples were collected using a Waikato milk flow meter. All samples were refrigerated at 0–4 °C without adding any preservatives and analysed within 2 days of sampling.

2.3. Analysis of MCPs

The MCPs were measured using a Formagraph [7,21] (Foss Electric, DK-3400, Hillerød, Denmark) of the model type 20: 1 recorder + 1 service module with the capacity of 20 samples/hour. Each sample of 10 mL milk was heated to 35°C and mixed with 0.2 mL rennet solution. Rennet powder (1100 IMCU/g with 96% chymosin and 4% pepsin; prepared according to IDF standard 157:2007 by Renco, New Zealand) was freshly diluted with Milli-Q water to obtain a solution of 0.24% (wt/vol), with a final value of 0.0528 IMCU/mL before addition. Rennet coagulation time (RCT, min), curd firming time or time taken to form 20 mm depth curd (K20, min), and curd firmness 30 min after rennet addition (A30, mm) were measured for two replicates for each sample for 30 min. The Formagraph was used in this study due to the large number of samples, as it allows a minimum of 10 milk samples to coagulate in a maximum of 30 min.
The following model was developed to predict the average curd firmness over time for the different milking groups to allow the shape of the curves to be described. This model is a 2nd order plus dead time (SOPDT) model [22] to get a better fit early in the response to improve the predictive capability of the model.
C F t = C F P ( 1 − τ 1 τ 1 − τ 2 e ( − ( t − R C T e q ) τ 1 ) + τ 2 τ 1 − τ 2 e ( − ( t − R C T e q ) τ 2 ) )
where CFt is the curd firmness at time t (mm); CFp is the asymptotical potential value of curd firmness at an infinite time (mm); τ1 and τ2 are the time constants; RCTeq is the rennet coagulation time equivalent to the RCT in traditional Formagraph. This model was used to illustrate the different shapes of the Formagraph plots over time for the different milking groups.

2.4. Determination of Milk Composition

Concentrations of fat, protein, lactose, and total solids of all the samples were measured using a Milkoscan FT1 instrument (Foss Analytical, Hillerød, Denmark).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Least-squares means, and standard errors of the variables were obtained using the following linear model using the GLM procedure.
Yijkm = μ + MSi + Bj(MSi) + Lk + β1dm + eijkm
Yijkm is the observation for composition and coagulation traits for milking frequency-milking time i, breed group j, lactation number k, and cow m.
μ is the population mean.
MSi is the fixed effect of milking frequency-milking time i (i = OAD, TAD-morning, and TAD-afternoon).
Bj(MSi) is the fixed effect of breed j nested in milking frequency-milking time i (j = F, F × J, and J).
Lk is the fixed effect of lactation number (k = 1st and 2nd lactation).
β1 is the regression coefficient associated with the linear effect of deviation from the median calving date of cow m.
eijkm is the residual random error assumed with mean zero and variance σ e 2 .
A limitation of this study was the confounding effect of feed and MF. The feed provided by each farm was not identical during the experimental period. The cows milked TAD were fed slightly higher supplements than cows milked OAD. However, the genetic merit of the cows in the two farms was similar because there were a few sires that had progeny in both farms.
Partial correlations between the dependent variables in each milking frequency-milking time were performed by MANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS adjusting for the fixed effects of breed and lactation number.
Above GLM model was used with the direct measurements of MCPs from Formagraph such as RCT, K20, and A30.

3. Results

Descriptive statistics of daily milk yield, milk composition, and MCPs of cows sampled in the study are presented in Table 2.
The minimum value for A30 was 0.01 mm. A very low value for A30 was observed for 14% of F cows and 7% of F × J cows. F-values for factors affecting milk yield, milk composition traits, and MCPs are presented in Table 3. The milking frequency-milking time explained the largest proportion of variation in most traits, except for lactose percentage, K20, and A30; for these traits milking frequency-milking time was non-significant. Breed nested in milking frequency-milking time explained the significant variation in all traits except for lactose percentage. For lactose percentage and A30, the lactation number explained the majority of variations.
Records with poorly correlated samples were included when calculating the least-squares means to avoid bias in the results. The least-squares means and standard errors for the milk composition and coagulation properties for F, F × J, and J cows milked OAD or TAD in the morning and afternoon are shown in Table 4. Milk from F × J cows milked TAD morning had significantly (p < 0.05) higher fat concentrations compared to F cows. Jersey cows milked TAD in the afternoon produced milk with a higher concentration of fat compared to F cows. Similarly, Jersey cows milked OAD and TAD in the morning produced milk with a significantly higher concentration of protein compared to F cows. Milk from J cows coagulated significantly faster (lower RCT and K20 means) and produced a significantly firmer curd (higher A30 mean) compared to F cows in each milking frequency-milking time. The K20 was significantly lower in J cows milked TAD in the morning and afternoon compared to F cows. Friesian × Jersey cows had intermediate values for most MCPs in each milking frequency-milking time, but most differences were not significant.
In cows milked OAD, all three coagulation properties showed no significant correlation with fat concentration (Table 5). However, the correlation between K20 and protein percentage was negative (p < 0.05). The correlation between A30 and lactose percentage was positive (p < 0.05). The results also show a strong correlation coefficient among MCPs, with RCT being positively and significantly correlated with K20 and negatively and significantly correlated with A30.
In cows milked TAD in the morning, RCT was negatively (p < 0.05) correlated with fat concentration (Table 6). The time taken to form a 20 mm curd width after rennet addition (K20) was significantly and negatively correlated with the concentrations of fat and protein, whereas A30 was significantly and positively correlated with fat and protein concentrations. In cows milked TAD in the morning and afternoon, the correlation between RCT and K20 was positive (p < 0.05) and the correlation between RCT and A30 was strongly negative (p < 0.05).
The partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows milked in the study are presented in Table 7. Curd firming time (K20) was significantly and negatively correlated with the concentrations of fat and protein whereas A30 was significantly and positively correlated with fat and protein concentrations.
Figure 1 shows the differences between the curd firmness over time from the rennet addition of milk from cows milked OAD and cows milked TAD in the morning and afternoon. The curves were obtained by averaging the curd firmness as measured by the Formagraph. Twice-a-day morning milk coagulated faster than TAD afternoon milk and OAD milk.
Dairy 04 00012 g001 550
Figure 1. The pattern of curd firming after rennet addition of milk from cows milked once a day (OAD) and twice a day (TAD) (morning and afternoon) in the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Figure 1. The pattern of curd firming after rennet addition of milk from cows milked once a day (OAD) and twice a day (TAD) (morning and afternoon) in the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Dairy 04 00012 g001
However, as per the model developed, the asymptotical potential value of curd firmness at an infinite time was higher for OAD milk (53.05 mm) compared to TAD-morning milk (47.69 mm). The asymptotical potential value of curd firmness for TAD-afternoon milk was 43.50 mm.

4. Discussion

The present study evaluated the effect of breed (F, F × J, and J cows) and milking frequency-milking time (OAD and TAD in the morning and afternoon in late lactation) on milk composition and coagulation parameters. It has been previously identified that breed significantly affects MCPs [23,24]. However, little information is available regarding the effects of the breed with the interaction of milking frequency on MCPs.
Jersey cows were superior in the concentrations of fat and protein compared to F cows in each milk milking frequency-milking time. These results are in agreement with Auldist et al. [12] and Lopez-Villalobos et al. [25] in cows milked TAD and Tong et al. [3] and Clark et al. [6] in cows milked OAD. Higher concentrations of fat and protein could be a reason for faster K20 and greater curd firmness (A30) in J cows compared to F cows within the milking frequency-milking time. Similar results were reported by Auldist et al. [12], Poulson et al. [26] and Stocco et al. [27]. Jersey cows were superior for MCPs compared to F cows in each milking frequency-milking time, with F × J cows being intermediate in most cases. A higher concentration of fat in F × J cows milked OAD would be due to the heterosis effect in which the progeny performs better than the average performance of the parents.
The fat concentration of milk is mainly associated with curd firmness as in the present study. Huppertz and Kelly [28] reported that milk flocculation occurs due to the collision and aggregation of fat globules and Stocco et al. [29] reported that this could affect the RCT. The role of fat in milk is considered as an inert filler between the gel network formed by the casein micelles and contributes to the curd structure [29,30,31]. More accurately, the ratio of casein: fat is more important for the coagulum strength than the concentration of fat on its own [10]. A higher concentration of protein means a higher concentration of casein as 80% of the protein in milk is casein. Milk with a higher concentration of casein leads to the formation of curd with higher firmness [14,32]. Of the different casein fractions, κ-casein is the fraction that initiates the process of cheese-making by interacting with chymosin. When the concentration of κ-casein is higher, the κ-casein hydrolysed by the rennet enzyme would be higher, which leads to the aggregation of more hydrolysed casein and results in a firmer curd. The results of this study suggest that the differences in the MCPs of breeds could be mainly due to the variation in the concentration of fat and protein between the breeds. Auldist et al. [12] reported that higher curd firmness in milk from J cows was obvious compared to F cows, in milk from individual cows, in bulk milk, and in milk standardised for protein: fat. However, this difference disappeared when bulk milk was standardised for constant solid concentration. Similarly, Stocco et al. [27] reported, that the differences between breeds for MCPs were mainly due to the variation in the genetic factors controlling the production of milk fat, protein, and lactose. This study suggests the same.
In this study correlations between milk composition and MCPs and correlations among MCPs were obtained. When considering MCPs, strong and negative correlations between RCT and A30 were reported, which was in agreement with Okigbo et al. [33]. Lower RCT means the presence of a higher concentration of protein, especially casein, to form the three-dimensional network and the gel faster which leads to firmer curd. Rennet coagulation time also positively correlated with K20, meaning when RCT is lower the formation of a three-dimensional network and gel is faster, therefore the time taken to form 20 mm width curd (A20) will be lower. When the concentrations of fat and protein were higher, K20 was faster due to the availability of more hydrolysed casein aggregation and trapped fat inside the gel network. However, all these processes depend on the substrate-to-enzyme ratio.
The correlation coefficients between MCPs and the concentrations of fat and protein were weak to moderate in each milking frequency-milking time. RCT was not related to concentrations of fat or protein except in cows milked TAD in the morning, with higher fat associated with lower RCT. It seems the relationship between K20, and milk composition depends on the milking frequency- milking time because K20 was correlated with the concentration of protein in OAD milk, correlated with fat in TAD afternoon milk, and correlated with both the concentrations of fat and protein in TAD morning milk and in all the milk samples regardless of milking frequency and milking time. Similarly, the higher the concentration of either fat or protein or both, the greater the A30, except for cows milked OAD. This suggests the composition has little effect on MCPs, but they were influenced by milking frequency-milking time.
Similar results were reported by Auldist et al. [12] in cows milked TAD, in which RCT was not correlated with any of the milk components, and the correlation coefficients for K20 and A30 were weak. Stocco et al. [29] reported that an increase in the fat concentration in goat milk shortened the RCT and curd firming time and affected the A45 and A60 in a cubic trend. They also reported that higher protein concentration increased the RCT and that a higher concentration of casein raised the curd firmness. However, the authors noted that the correlations explained only a small proportion of the variation in the MCPs. De Marchi et al. [23] reported that the concentrations of fat and protein did not control significant variation in MCPs as the MCPs were better in the Rendena breed than Brown Swiss, although the Brown Swiss breed has better milk quality traits, particularly higher fat and protein concentrations. These results suggest that the composition of milk is not a useful indicator of MCPs of milk from cows milked OAD and TAD in the morning and afternoon. This is also supported by the weak to moderate correlation coefficients obtained in this study. It seems the correlation coefficients depended on milking frequency-milking time as the values of the correlation coefficients between milk composition and MCPs were not constant across milking frequency-milking time combinations. Keffored et al. [34] and Auldist et al. [12] reported that MCPs are controlled by a more complex combination of parameters than the composition, breed, and protein polymorphism.
One of the important factors affecting MCPs is the genetic variant of κ-casein which can be A or B. The B variant is associated with a higher concentration of protein, and a higher proportion of κ-casein in the total casein and leads to improved MCPs [35,36,37]. In New Zealand and across the world, the A variant of κ-casein is predominant in F cows and the B variant is predominant in J cows [38]. The superiority of J cows for the MCPs could be due to the presence of the B variant for κ-casein as the B allele has greater MCPs [10]. Gai et al. [39] reported that the C variant of α-casein, B and A1 variants of β-casein, and B variants of β-lactoglobulin are superior for MCPs. Similarly, Walsh et al. [40] and Mayer et al. [41] reported that both the κ-casein BB genotype and β-lactoglobulin BB genotype have greater MCPs. In addition, the calcium concentration of milk is also crucial for better MCPs. Adding Ca2+ speeds up the RCT by increasing the aggregation of renneted micelles [42]. Davis et al. [43] reported that J cow milk contains a higher Ca: protein ratio. However, Auldist et al. [12] did not observe this. In the present study, the concentrations of each casein fraction and calcium were not studied. Milk coagulation is a process that seems dependent on milk composition, mineral composition of milk, genetic variants, and maybe a combination of all factors.
Based on the Formagraph results, the TAD morning milk coagulated faster and formed firmer curd at around 30 min compared to the other two milk, but the asymptotical potential value of curd firmness was lower compared to OAD milk. Faster rennet coagulation could be explained by the substrate: enzyme ratio. The ratio of κ-casein: rennet would be lower in TAD morning milk and the proportion of cleaved substrate rose faster to form firm curd. On the other hand, OAD milk has a higher concentration of casein [16,17] and therefore, a higher κ-casein: rennet ratio, which led to the proportion of cleaved substrate initially rising more slowly (i.e., longer RCT) but the formation of a more extensive network in a given sufficient time and hence a higher asymptotical potential value than the TAD-morning milk. Stocco et al. [27] reported that in goat milk, where the concentration of rennet was not adjusted to the concentration of protein, the RCT was longer due to the lower rennet-to-casein ratio. The reason for this is the need for more time to form sufficient hydrolysis of κ-casein to induce the aggregation of para-casein micelles [44]. Milk from the OAD herd had higher fat and protein concentration compared to TAD morning and afternoon milk. As adding a constant amount of rennet gives a higher substrate: enzyme ratio for higher protein milk, some of the observed results may indicate that the MCPs, as measured by the Formagraph, are being affected by the substrate: enzyme ratio. Therefore, further studies should be conducted while keeping the substrate: enzyme ratio constant.
Low values for A30 could be due to the poor coagulation ability of milk. De Marchi et al. [23] reported F cows showed the highest percentage of poorly coagulated samples compared to Simmental and Rendena cows in Italy. Tyriseva et al. [45] found that noncoagulating milk from F cows was genetically related to each other and suggested that these poor MCPs could be linked to genetic factors. Chiofaloa et al. [46] proposed that the reason for lower MCPs in F cows could be a higher concentration of plasmin content, which causes proteolysis of casein and partially reduce the casein: true protein ratio. The limitation of using the current Formagraph method is that the time of the coagulation process is set to 30 min. This causes failure in measuring the RCT and K20 values [27]. The use of traditional Formagraph test time could introduce a bias in comparing milk [27] from different breeds and different milking frequency-milking times. The Formagraph is a useful tool to measure the MCPs for 30 min, and models were developed to predict the curd firmness beyond 30 min using the information from the Formagraph [47].
The results of the present study were obtained in the late lactation of the milking season. Lucey [48] reported that milk from late lactation is less suitable for producing high-quality dairy products. This could be due to higher plasmin and plasmin activity which cause the deterioration of MCPs by the proteolysis of casein in milk [49]. Lucy [48] reported that OAD milking during late lactation would produce milk with higher plasminogen and plasmin activity. This suggests that milk from cows milked OAD in late lactation is less suitable for cheese making. However, Bastian et al. [50] reported that plasmin activity did not influence the clotting time. In contrast, Tyriseva et al. [45] and Vacca et al. [51] reported better MCPs in late lactation milk. It is also important to note that the stage of lactation has a strong connection with the quality of diet. Therefore, the quality and processability of late lactation milk are also decided by the diet given to cows. The study could be repeated using cows in early and mid-lactation with controlled feed to find the suitability of milk for processing of the different breeds and milking frequency.

5. Conclusions

Jersey cows were superior for the fat and protein concentrations and MCPs compared to F cows milked in the three-milking frequency-milking times. While milk composition was correlated with MCPs, they were only low to moderate and unlikely to help predict MCPs. Better relationships between the concentration of fat and MCPs and the concentration of protein and MCPs were observed in TAD morning milk. There were differences in MCPs between breeds, but this is likely due to composition of milk. Milk coagulation properties seem to be controlled by a combination of several factors. Selecting J cows for would be beneficial for processing companies as they show greater MCPs based on the concentration of milk solids. However, further research with more control on feeding and milk composition would lead to a better understanding of the true effect of breeds and milking frequency on MCPs.

Author Contributions

I.S., N.L.-V., H.T.B., P.W.M.J., S.E.H. and A.K.H.M. contributed to the conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, original draft preparation, review, and editing. N.L.-V., H.T.B., P.W.M.J., S.E.H. and A.K.H.M. contributed to the supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Massey University and Inthujaa Sanjayaranj was sponsored by AHEAD Scholarship, Sri Lanka.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethical review and approval were waived because this study did not directly deal with the animals; instead, milk was collected from the milking parlour as part of the usual herd-testing routine.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Davis, S.R. Lactational traits of importance in dairy cows and applications for emerging biotechnologies. N. Z. Vet. J. 2005, 53, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Davis, S.R.; Farr, V.C.; Stelwagen, K. Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-daily milking: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999, 59, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tong, M.J.; Clark, D.A.; Cooper, C.V. Once-a-day milking: Possible and profitable? Proc. N. Z. Grassl. Assoc. 2002, 64, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stelwagen, K.; Phyn, C.V.V.; Davis, S.R.; Guinard-Flament, J.; Pomiès, D.; Roche, J.R.; Kay, J.K. Invited review: Reduced milking frequency: Milk production and management implications. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 3401–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Holmes, C.W.; Wilson, G.F.; Mackenzie, D.D.; Purchas, J. The effects of milking once-daily throughout lactation on the performance of dairy cows grazing on pasture. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2002, 52, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, D.A.; Phyn, C.V.C.; Tong, M.J.; Collis, S.J.; Dalley, D.E. A systems comparison of once-versus twice daily milking of pastured dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 1854–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Troch, T.; Lefebure, E.; Baeten, V.; Colinet, F.; Gengler, N.; Sindic, M. Cow milk coagulation: Process description, variation factors and evaluation methodologies. A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Société Environ. 2017, 21, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dalgleish, D.G. Bovine milk protein properties and the manufacturing quality of milk. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1993, 35, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Summer, A.; Malacarne, M.; Martuzzi, F.; Mariani, P. Structural and functional properties of Modenese cow milk in Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese production. Ann. Fac. Med. Vet. Univ. Parma 2002, 22, 163–174. [Google Scholar]
  10. Amenu, B.; Deeth, H.C. The impact of milk composition on cheddar cheese manufacture. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 2007, 62, 171–184. [Google Scholar]
  11. Stocco, G.; Summer, A.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Malacarne, M.; Cecchinato, A.; Amalfitano, N.; Bittante, G. The mineral profile affects the coagulation pattern and cheese-making efficiency of bovine milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 8439–8453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Auldist, M.J.; Johnston, K.A.; White, N.J.; Fitzsimons, W.P.; Boland, M.J. A comparison of the composition, coagulation characteristics and cheesemaking capacity of milk from Friesian and Jersey dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 71, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lembeye, F.; López-Villalobos, N.; Burke, J.L.; Davis, S.R. Estimation of breed and heterosis effects for milk traits and somatic cell scores in cows milked once and twice daily in New Zealand. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2015, 75, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  14. Auldist, M.J.; Mullins, C.; O’Brien, B.; O’Kennedy, B.T.; Guinee, T. Effect of cow breed on milk coagulation properties. Milchwissenschaft 2002, 57, 140–143. [Google Scholar]
  15. O’Brien, B.; Ryan, G.; Meaney, W.J.; McDonagh, D.; Kelly, A. Effect of frequency of milking on yield, composition, and processing quality of milk. J. Dairy Res. 2002, 69, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pomies, D.; Martin, B.; Chilliard, Y.; Pradel, P.; Rémond, B. Once-a-day milking of Holstein and Montbéliarde cows for 7 weeks in mid-lactation. Animal 2007, 1, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martin, B.; Pomies, D.; Pradel, P.; Verdier-Metz, I.; Rémond, B. Yield and sensory properties of cheese made with milk from Holstein or Montbéliarde cows milked twice or once daily. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 4730–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gilbert, G.R.; Hargrove, G.L.; Kroger, M. Diurnal variations in milk yield, fat yield, milk fat percentage, and milk protein percentage of Holstein-Friesian cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1973, 56, 409–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bondan, C.; Folchini, J.A.; Noro, M.; Machado, K.M.; Muhls, E.; González, F.H. Variation of cow’s milk composition across different daily milking sessions and feasibility of using a composite sampling. Cienc. Rural 2019, 49, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sanjayaranj, I.; Lopez-Villalobos, N.; Blair, H.T.; Janssen, P.W.; Holroyd, S.E.; MacGibbon, A.K. Fatty Acid Composition of Dairy Milk: A Case Study Comparing Once-and Twice-a-Day Milking of Pasture-Fed Cows at Different Stages of Lactation. Dairy 2022, 3, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McMahon, D.J.; Brown, R.J. Evaluation of Formagraph for comparing rennet solutions. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 1639–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seborg, D.E.; Edgar, T.F.; Mellichamp, D.A.; Doyle, F.J., III. Process Dynamics and Control, 4th ed.; John Wiley and Sons Inc: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Marchi, M.; Dal Zotto, R.; Cassandro, M.; Bittante, G. Milk coagulation ability of five dairy cattle breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, 3986–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bittante, G.; Penasa, M.; Cecchinato, A. Invited review: Genetics and modeling of milk coagulation properties. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 6843–6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lopez-Villalobos, N.; Spelman, R.J.; Melis, J.; Davis, S.R.; Berry, S.D.; Lehnert, K.; Holroyd, S.E.; MacGibbon, A.K.; Snell, R.G. Estimation of genetic and crossbreeding parameters of fatty acid concentrations in milk fat predicted by mid-infrared spectroscopy in New Zealand dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 81, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Poulsen, N.A.; Bertelsen, H.P.; Jensen, H.B.; Gustavsson, F.; Glantz, M.; Månsson, H.L.; Andrén, A.; Paulsson, M.; Bendixen, C.; Buitenhuis, A.J.; et al. The occurrence of noncoagulating milk and the association of bovine milk coagulation properties with genetic variants of the caseins in 3 Scandinavian dairy breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 4830–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Stocco, G.; Cipolat-Gotet, C.; Bobbo, T.; Cecchinato, A.; Bittante, G. Breed of cow and herd productivity affect milk composition and modeling of coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huppertz, T.; Kelly, A.L. Physical chemistry of milk fat globules. In Advanced Dairy Chemistry, Lipids, 3rd ed.; Fox, P.F., McSweeney, P.L.H., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 173–212. [Google Scholar]
  29. Stocco, G.; Pazzola, M.; Dettori, M.L.; Paschino, P.; Bittante, G.; Vacca, G.M. Effect of composition on coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis of goat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 9693–9702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Green, M.L.; Grandison, A.S. Secondary (non-enzymatic) phase of rennet coagulation and postcoagulation phenomena. In Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Fox, P.F., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1993; Volume 1, pp. 101–140. [Google Scholar]
  31. Salaün, F.; Mietton, B.; Gaucheron, F. Buffering capacity of dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 2005, 15, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fossa, E.; Pecorari, M.; Sandri, S.; Tosi, F.; Mariani, P. The role of milk casein content in the Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese production: Chemical composition, rennet coagulation properties and dairy technological behaviour of milk. Sci. Tec. Latt.-Casearia 1994, 45, 519–535. [Google Scholar]
  33. Okigbo, L.M.; Richardson, G.H.; Brown, R.J.; Ernstrom, C.A. Variation in coagulation properties of milk from individual cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1985, 68, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kefford, B.; Christian, M.P.; Sutherland, B.J.; Mayes, J.J.; Grainger, C. Seasonal influences on Cheddar cheese manufacture: Influence of diet quality and stage of lactation. J. Dairy Res. 1995, 62, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jensen, H.B.; Holland, J.W.; Poulsen, N.A.; Larsen, L.B. Milk protein genetic variants and isoforms identified in bovine milk representing extremes in coagulation properties. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 2891–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Petrovska, S.; Jonkus, D.; Zagorska, J.; Ciprovica, I. The influence of kappa-casein and beta-lactoglobulin genotypes on milk coagulation properties in Latvia dairy breed. Res. Rural Dev. 2017, 2, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cendron, F.; Franzoi, M.; Penasa, M.; De Marchi, M.; Cassandro, M. Effects of β-and κ-casein, and β-lactoglobulin single and composite genotypes on milk composition and milk coagulation properties of Italian Holsteins assessed by FT-MIR. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 20, 2243–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hill, J.P.; Creamer, L.K.; Boland, M.J. Milk protein genetic polymorphism in a sample New Zealand cow population. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1993, 35, 192–193. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gai, N.; Uniacke-Lowe, T.; O’Regan, J.; Faulkner, H.; Kelly, A.L. Effect of Protein Genotypes on Physicochemical Properties and Protein Functionality of Bovine Milk: A Review. Foods 2021, 10, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Walsh, C.D.; Guinee, T.P.; Harrington, D.; Mehra, R.; Murphy, J.J.; Connolly, J.F.; Fitzerald, R.J. Cheddar cheesemaking and rennet coagulation characteristics of bovine milks containing κ-casein AA or BB genetic variants. Milchwissenschaft 1995, 50, 492–495. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mayer, H.K.; Ortner, M.; Tschager, E.; Ginzinger, W. Composite milk protein phenotypes in relation to composition and cheesemaking properties of milk. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lucey, J.A.; Fox, P.F. Rennet coagulation properties of late-lactation milk, Effect of pH adjustment, addition of CaCl2, variation in rennet level and blending with mid-lactation milk. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 1992, 31, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  43. Davis, S.R.; Farr, V.C.; Knowles, S.O.; Lee, J.; Kolver, E.S.; Auldist, M.J. Sources of variation in milk calcium content. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 2001, 56, 156. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fox, P.F.; Guinee, T.P.; Cogan, T.M.; McSweeney, P.L.H. Fundamentals of Cheese Science, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tyrisevä, A.M.; Vahlsten, T.; Ruottinen, O.; Ojala, M. Noncoagulation of milk in Finnish Ayrshire and Holstein-Friesian cows and effect of herds on milk coagulation ability. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 3958–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chiofalo, V.; Maldonato, R.; Martin, B.; Dupont, D.; Coulon, J.B. Chemical composition and coagulation properties of Modicana and Holstein cows’ milk. Ann. Zootech. 2000, 49, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bittante, G.; Contiero, B.; Cecchinato, A. Prolonged observation and modelling of milk coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis. Int. Dairy J. 2013, 29, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lucey, J. Cheesemaking from grass based seasonal milk and problems associated with late-lactation milk. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 1996, 49, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fantuz, F.; Polidori, F.; Cheli, F.; Baldi, A. Plasminogen activation system in goat milk and its relation with composition and coagulation properties. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 1786–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bastian, E.D.; Brown, R.J.; Ernstrom, C.A. Plasmin activity and milk coagulation. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3677–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vacca, G.M.; Stocco, G.; Dettori, M.L.; Pira, E.; Bittante, G.; Pazzola, M. Milk yield, quality, and coagulation properties of 6 breeds of goats: Environmental and individual variability. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 7236–7247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Dietary and chemical composition of feed offered at the No. 1 and No. 4 Dairy farms during the sampling periods (late lactation) in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 1. Dietary and chemical composition of feed offered at the No. 1 and No. 4 Dairy farms during the sampling periods (late lactation) in the 2020–2021 production season.
FarmNo. 1 Dairy Farm (OAD 11)No. 4 Dairy Farm (TAD 12)
Diet composition (kg DM/cow/day)
Pasture4.510.0
Herb mix crop 13.0-
Maize silage-2.0
DDG 2--
Tapioca pellets1.5-
Concentrate 32.01.0
Dry roughage 4-1.0
Baleage 54.010.0
Diet chemical composition
ME 6 MJ/kg DM9.9811.28
CP 7 g/100 g DM21.9121.27
NDF 8 g/100 g DM39.8845.69
ADF 9 g/100 g DM26.0025.40
SSS 10 g/100 g DM8.798.59
Lipid g/100 g DM4.544.77
1 Comprises chicory (Cichorium intybus), red clover (Trifolium pratense), and plantain (Plantago lanceolata); 2 distillers dried grain; 3 grain-based concentrate; 4 hay and straw; 5 Lucerne baleage in the No. 1 dairy farm and grass baleage in the No. 4 dairy farm; DM = dry matter; 6 ME = metabolisable energy; 7 CP = crude protein; 8 NDF = neutral detergent fibre; 9 ADF = acid detergent fibre; 10 SSS = soluble sugars and starch; 11 OAD = once-a-day milking; 12 TAD = twice-a-day milking; baleage is partly dried forage, with 45–55% moisture and is baled and wrapped with at least 6 layers of 0.025 mm plastic.
Table
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of milk composition and milk coagulation properties of cows sampled during late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of milk composition and milk coagulation properties of cows sampled during late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
TraitNMeanSDCV%MinMax
Milk yield (kg/cow/day)908.433.1537.323.3016.3
Fat %905.321.1922.392.628.53
Protein %904.380.357.983.625.52
Lactose %904.740.194.004.195.05
Total solids %9015.021.409.3011.618.53
RCT 1 (min)8214.074.6733.176.0225.51
K20 2 (min)764.172.1351.051.5610.70
A30 3 (mm)8840.2417.1342.570.0160.34
1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition.
Table
Table 3. The F-values for factors affecting milk composition and milk coagulation properties of cows milked once a day (OAD) and twice a day (TAD) sampled in the morning and afternoon during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 3. The F-values for factors affecting milk composition and milk coagulation properties of cows milked once a day (OAD) and twice a day (TAD) sampled in the morning and afternoon during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
TraitMilking Frequency-Milking TimeLactation NumberBreed within Milking Frequency-Milking Timedmcd
Milk yield (kg/cow/day)62.5 ***17.73 ***4.5 **1.43
Fat%26.94 ***1.233.06 *1.25
Protein %7.41 **0.033.06 *0.85
Lactose %2.085.08 *0.660.50
Total solids %19.05 ***0.443.84 **1.23
RCT 1 (min)30.13 ***2.603.59 **0.28
K20 2 (min) 0.090.193.18 **0.37
A30 3 (mm)1.605.63 *4.24 **0.14
dmcd = deviation from median calving date. 1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition; Statistical significance is given as * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 4. Least-squares means and standard errors of milk composition and coagulation properties of milk from Holstein-Friesian (F), Holstein-Friesian Jersey crossbred (F × J) and Jersey (J) cows milked once-a-day (OAD) and twice-a-day (TAD) sampled in the morning and afternoon during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 4. Least-squares means and standard errors of milk composition and coagulation properties of milk from Holstein-Friesian (F), Holstein-Friesian Jersey crossbred (F × J) and Jersey (J) cows milked once-a-day (OAD) and twice-a-day (TAD) sampled in the morning and afternoon during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
TraitOADTAD-MorningTAD-Afternoon
FF × JJFF × JJFF × JJ
Milk yield (L/cow/day)11.72 ± 0.54 a10.91 ± 0.71 ab9.25 ± 0.53 b10.53 ± 0.44 a7.91 ± 0.56 b8.73 ± 0.88 ab5.77 ± 0.44 4.65 ± 0.56 4.91 ± 0.88
Fat%5.44 ± 0.27 5.85 ± 0.35 6.15 ± 0.26 3.82 ± 0.22 b4.82 ± 0.28 a4.44 ± 0.44 ab5.56 ± 0.22 b6.13 ± 0.28 ab6.82 ± 0.44 a
Protein%4.45 ± 0.09 b4.57 ± 0.12 ab4.81 ± 0.09 a4.15 ± 0.08 b4.29 ± 0.09 ab4.61 ± 0.15 a4.20 ± 0.08 4.35 ± 0.09 4.41 ± 0.15
Lactose%4.66 ± 0.06 4.73 ± 0.07 4.67 ± 0.06 4.82 ± 0.05 4.72 ± 0.06 4.84 ± 0.09 4.76 ± 0.05 4.7 ± 0.06 4.78 ± 0.09
Total solids %15.13 ± 0.33 b15.72 ± 0.43 ab16.28 ± 0.32 a13.29 ± 0.27 b14.47 ± 0.34 a14.52 ± 0.53 a15.02 ± 0.27 b15.81 ± 0.34 ab16.63 ± 0.53 a
RCT 1 (min)18.33 ± 1.04 a17.19 ± 1.37 ab14.1 ± 1.02 b11.15 ± 0.92 a9.49 ± 1.12 ab6.84 ± 1.69 b17.18 ± 0.95 a15.49 ± 1.20 ab11.74 ± 1.69 b
K20 2 (min)4.16 ± 0.69 4.79 ± 0.81 2.81 ± 0.6 5.39 ± 0.56 a3.9 ± 0.66 ab2.01 ± 1.00 b5.39 ± 0.61 a3.88 ± 0.76 ab2.86 ± 1.00 b
A30 3 (mm)34.74 ± 4.68 b38.38 ± 6.14 ab53.57 ± 4.57 a38.52 ± 3.96 b44.5 ± 4.81 ab60.08 ± 7.58 a27.8 ± 3.83 b36.33 ± 5.06 b54.91 ± 7.58 a
1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition; a,b Means with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05) across breeds within miking frequency-milking time.
Table
Table 5. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows milked once a day during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 5. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows milked once a day during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Milk YieldFatProteinLactoseTotal SolidsRCTK20A30
Milk yield (L/cow/day) −0.380.020.48 *−0.30−0.310.100.24
Fat % 0.51 *−0.040.97 ***0.18−0.340.05
Protein % 0.140.68 **0.05−0.49 *0.20
Lactose % 0.09−0.33−0.110.41 *
Total solids % 0.14−0.42 *0.13
RCT 1 (min) 0.58 **−0.89 ***
K20 2 (min) −0.73 ***
A30 3 (mm)
1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition; Statistical significance is given as * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 6. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows milked twice a day (TAD) morning above the diagonal and afternoon below the diagonal during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 6. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows milked twice a day (TAD) morning above the diagonal and afternoon below the diagonal during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Milk YieldFatProteinLactoseTotal SolidsRCTK20A30
Milk yield (L/cow/day) −0.22−0.270.50 *−0.220.110.06−0.11
Fat %−0.29 0.34−0.030.93 ***−0.67 **−0.62 **0.60 **
Protein %0.040.64 ** −0.220.64 **−0.27−0.50 *0.53 *
Lactose %0.39−0.45−0.44 −0.030.180.18−0.23
Total solids %−0.200.96 ***0.80 ***−0.41 −0.65 **−0.68 **0.67 **
RCT 1 (min)0.20−0.390.060.02−0.30 0.89 ***−0.91 ***
K20 2 (min)−0.02−0.52 *−0.320.26−0.49 *0.71 * −0.98 ***
A30 3 (mm)−0.180.54 *0.24−0.250.50 *−0.90 ***−0.88 ***
1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition; Statistical significance is given as * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table
Table 7. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows (regardless of milking frequency and milking time) during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Table 7. Partial correlation coefficients between coagulation properties and milk components of cows (regardless of milking frequency and milking time) during the late lactation in the 2020–2021 production season.
Milk YieldFatProteinLactoseTotal SolidsRCTK20A30
Milk yield (L/cow/day) −0.27 *−0.050.42 **−0.21−0.060.060.03
Fat % 0.49 ***−0.100.95 ***−0.21−0.43 **0.34 **
Protein % −0.140.70 ***−0.05−0.41 **0.33 **
Lactose % −0.04−0.050.11−0.01
Total solids % −0.21−0.47 ***0.40 **
RCT 1 (min) 0.73 ***−0.89 ***
K20 2 (min) −0.86 ***
A30 3 (mm)
1 Rennet coagulation time; 2 Curd firming time; 3 Width of the curd at 30 min after rennet addition; Statistical significance is given as * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanjayaranj, I.; Lopez-Villalobos, N.; Blair, H.T.; Janssen, P.W.M.; Holroyd, S.E.; MacGibbon, A.K.H. A Study of Milk Composition and Coagulation Properties of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Their Cross Milked Once or Twice a Day. Dairy 2023, 4, 167-179. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4010012

AMA Style

Sanjayaranj I, Lopez-Villalobos N, Blair HT, Janssen PWM, Holroyd SE, MacGibbon AKH. A Study of Milk Composition and Coagulation Properties of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Their Cross Milked Once or Twice a Day. Dairy. 2023; 4(1):167-179. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanjayaranj, Inthujaa, Nicolas Lopez-Villalobos, Hugh T. Blair, Patrick W. M. Janssen, Stephen E. Holroyd, and Alastair K. H. MacGibbon. 2023. "A Study of Milk Composition and Coagulation Properties of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Their Cross Milked Once or Twice a Day" Dairy 4, no. 1: 167-179. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4010012

APA Style

Sanjayaranj, I., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Blair, H. T., Janssen, P. W. M., Holroyd, S. E., & MacGibbon, A. K. H. (2023). A Study of Milk Composition and Coagulation Properties of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey, and Their Cross Milked Once or Twice a Day. Dairy, 4(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy4010012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop