Next Article in Journal
Changes in Native Whey Protein Content, Gel Formation, and Endogenous Enzyme Activities Induced by Flow-Through Heat Treatments of Goat and Sheep Milk
Previous Article in Journal
Sire Effects on Birth Weight, Gestation Length, and Pre-Weaning Growth of Beef-Cross-Dairy Calves: A Case Study in New Zealand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Red Pigments Produced by Cheese-Ripening Bacterial Strains of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Using HPLC

by
Nuthathai Sutthiwong
1,*,
Piyada Sukdee
1,
Supaporn Lekhavat
1 and
Laurent Dufossé
2,*
1
Expert Centre of Innovative Health Food (InnoFood), Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research, Technopolis 35 Mu 3, Klong Ha, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
2
Chimie et Biotechnologie des Produits Naturels (CHEMBIOPRO), ESIROI Département Agroalimentaire, Université de La Réunion, Parc Technologique, 2 rue Joseph Wetzell, F-97490 Sainte-Clotilde, Ile de La Réunion, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dairy 2021, 2(3), 396-409; https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy2030031
Submission received: 26 May 2021 / Revised: 8 July 2021 / Accepted: 12 July 2021 / Published: 28 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Milk Processing)

Abstract

:
Glutamicibacter arilaitensis is one of the predominant bacterial species involved in the coloration of cheese rinds, especially smear-ripened cheeses. Besides well-known yellow-pigmented carotenoids, this species exhibits an ability to produce red pigments, as the occurrence of pink/red formation was previously found when co-cultured with a fungal strain. In this work, the red pigments synthesized by G. arilaitensis strains grown on cheese-based (curd) solid medium deacidified using Debaryomyces hansenii were identified. The analyses using HPLC equipped with both fluorescence and diode array detectors were performed to characterize the pigments extracted from a dry matter of the medium inoculated with either G. arilaitensis Re117, Po102, or Stp101. Based on the UV–vis absorption spectra, the elution order, and fluorescent property, compared to those of the porphyrin standards, eight metal-free porphyrins, including UPI, UPIII, 7PI, 6PI, 5PI, CPI, CPIII, and MPIX, were indicated as components of the red pigments produced by these G. arilaitensis strains. However, following the chromatographic profiles, the degree of porphyrins formed by each strain was apparently different. Regardless of precise quantitative measurement, the type strains Re117 and Po102 manifested a potential to produce a high amount of CPIII, whereas MPIX was formed by the strains Po102 and Stp101, but exceptionally high by the strain Stp101. The variation in both yield and form of the red pigments synthesized by the cheese-related bacterial G. arilaitensis has not previously been reported; therefore, our results provide the first information on these aspects.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Smear-ripened cheeses are among dairy products that are widely consumed, particularly in Europe. The colors of these cheese rinds, which are the result of pigment synthesis by complex surface microflora, play an important role in a consumer’s purchasing decision [1,2]. Unconventional color characteristics of cheeses can contribute to economic losses for producers because they possibly link to consumers’ misunderstanding of the quality of cheeses [3].
Pink pigmentation has commonly been identified as a defect in a broad range of cheeses. Different formations of this discoloration depending on cheese types are found, for example, occurring at the surface of the cheese block, diffusing within the cheese block, and arising as a ring uniform under the cheese rind [4,5,6]. Factors affecting pink discoloration are reportedly related to the change of physicochemical and microbial properties [7,8,9]. In terms of the microbial attribute, several studies have been detailed for a few decades that certain strains of starter cultures used for cheese production can synthesize red pigments; e.g., Microbacterium gubbeenense, Thermus thermophilus, Lactobacillus sp., and Arthrobacter sp. [10,11,12,13,14].
Arthrobacter arilaitensis (presently named Glutamicibacter arilaitensis—to be up to date, G. arilaitensis will be used throughout this article) is one of the important bacterial strains responsible for the pigmentation of cheese rinds due to its presence at different stages of the ripening process, principally at the middle and late stages [15,16]. Besides the yellow pigments, which were characterized as a group of C50 carotenoids consisting of eight forms, but mainly decaprenoxanthin, G. arilaitensis has recently been reported to synthesize red pigment(s) [17,18,19]. In our previous study [19], a strain of G. arilaitensis, Po102, evidently developed pink/red-brown color suffusing inside inoculated cheese-based (curd) solid media. After a tentative determination, the results showed that the pink pigments excreted by this strain were water-soluble and fluoresced under UV light. The UV–visible scanning of the extracts exhibited fine structure, with wavelengths of maximum absorption at 394, 497, 530, 567, and 620 nm. Corresponding to the recent information reported by Cleary et al. [20] and general characteristics of porphyrins (i.e., absorption spectra and fluorescence property), the pink/red-brown discovered would be pigments in the porphyrin series.
During recent decades, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has commonly been used as a technique for separating and identifying complex mixtures of molecules in food analysis because of such advantages as speed, high resolution, and sensitivity [21,22]. Several works on the identification of pigments produced by microorganisms used in cheese production were achieved by using HPLC [23,24,25]. The current work, therefore, applied this technique in order to characterize the pink/red-brown pigments produced by G. arilaitensis strains grown on cheese-based (curd) medium deacidified using D. hansenii.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Cultures

2.1.1. Bacterial and Yeast Strains

Three bacterial Glutamicibacter arilaitensis strains were selected for investigating their red-pigmented products in this work. The choice of 2 strains, namely G. arilaitensis Po102 and Stp101, was due to our previous works on their yellow pigmentation and combined effects of pH, NaCl, and deacidifying yeasts, in which red-brown pigmentation was incidentally found, while G. arilaitensis Re117 is the type strain of the species whose genome sequence was already revealed (nota bene: the type strain is also known under the following collection numbers: DSM 16,368/CIP 108,037/JCM 13566).
The strain, Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Po102, was isolated from cheeses in our laboratory, while the others, including the type strain Re117 and Stp101, and a deacidifying yeast Debaryomyces hansenii 304 were kindly provided by the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Thiverval-Grignon, France. They were maintained during this study on a medium depending on their nutrient requirements (i.e., milk ingredient-based medium for bacteria or potato dextrose agar for yeasts, as described below), stored at 4 °C, and subcultured monthly.

2.1.2. Cultures

Potato dextrose broth (PDB; BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France) was used as a subculture medium for D. hansenii 304, while the milk ingredient-based medium was prepared and used for the G. arilaitensis strains. A milk ingredient-based liquid medium containing 5 g casamino acids (BD Biosciences, Le Pont de Claix, France), 1 g yeast extract (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium), 5 g NaCl (Fisher Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France), 20 g D-glucose (HiMedia, Nashik, India), and 1 g KH2PO4 (HiMedia, Nashik, India) per liter of deionized water, was prepared. Before sterilizing at 121 °C for 15 min, the pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2 using 1 M NaOH (ACROS Organics, Geel, Belgium).
To prepare a microbial suspension, D. hansenii 304 was inoculated into a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL PDB, whereas the milk ingredient-based liquid medium was used instead of PDB for the G. arilaitensis strains. These flasks were incubated at 25 °C with agitation at 150 rpm for 2 days. After the cultivation period, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000× g for 10 min and resuspended in peptone saline diluent (1 g casein peptone (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and 8.5 g NaCl (HiMedia, Nashik, India)) adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. A suspension containing 107 cells mL−1 was prepared to be used in the next step.
A cheese-based (curd) solid medium was used to cultivate the strains of G. arilaitensis for the production of red pigments. The procedure for preparing the experimental medium employed in this study was adapted according to our previous work [19]. Whole milk was used to form a cheese curd via rennet coagulation. Before preparing the cheese-based medium, the frozen cheese curd, which was kept at −80 °C to prevent an enzymatic reaction, was thawed at 4 °C for roughly 24 h. The defrosted cheese curd was mixed with distilled water (60% w/v); then the mixture was homogenized using a blender and placed in a water bath (95 °C) for 30 min. Seventeen grams of agar and 2% NaCl (w/v) were added into the cheese slurry, and its pH was adjusted to 7.5, with 1 M NaOH. The final mixture was blended again until the texture was homogeneous, then pasteurized by heating at 80 °C for 10 min. After cooling down to 45–50 °C, the pour plate technique was used to prepare the cheese-based (curd) solid medium contained in Petri dishes, which were left to solidify for 2 h before inoculation with cheese-ripening strains.

2.2. Sample Preparation

2.2.1. Pigment Production

One mL of 107 cell suspension of D. hansenii 304 was spread over the surface of the cheese-based (curd) solid medium. All Petri dishes were then incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. Afterward, 1 mL of a 107 cell suspension of either G. arilaitensis strain was inoculated onto the surface of the medium, which thereafter was cultivated at 25 °C under the light.

2.2.2. Pigment Extraction and Purification

Selected Petri dishes containing media of either G. arilaitensis strain, which displayed pink/red-brown color, were lyophilized. A dry matter of each strain was totaled, and then individually extracted with ethyl acetate (VETEC, Bangalore, India) and acetic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in a ratio of 3:1 (v/v) using an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. A suspension was centrifuged (6000× g, 15 min), and later transferred the supernatant to a fresh tube. An aliquot of deionized water was added to the supernatant, then mixed vigorously and centrifuged at 7000× g for 5 min. The aqueous top layer was removed and discarded, whereas the organic one containing pink/red pigments was collected. The extraction was repeated until the supernatant and residual pellet were colorless.
All supernatants were mixed and evaporated under a vacuum. The concentrated sample was loaded onto a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters, Wexford, Ireland), which was conditioned and equilibrated with 4 mL acetonitrile (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 4 mL deionized water, and 4 mL formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) solution (0.1% v/v). The pink/red-brown pigments were washed sequentially with 4 mL deionized water, 4 mL formic acid solution, 4 mL acetonitrile/deionized water (5:95, v/v), and 4 mL acetonitrile.
The pigmented eluate was evaporated to dryness under a vacuum. Then, 1 mL of 3 M HCl (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to dissolve the residue, followed by filtering through a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany).

2.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis

2.3.1. Apparatus

The HPLC analysis was performed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 liquid chromatograph (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) equipped with the following parts: FLD-3400 RS fluorescence detector, DAD-3000 diode array detector, LPG-3400 SD pump, WPS-3000 TSL autosampler, and TCC-3000 SD column component. Monitoring, data recording, and processing were driven with the CHROMELEON 7 software (Dionex).

2.3.2. Chromatographic Condition

The separation was conducted on a Hypersil BDS C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, Thermo Scientific) with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The temperatures of autosampler and column were set at 5 °C and 35 °C, respectively. The fluorescence detector was adjusted at excitation of 400 nm and emission of 620 nm. The multilinear gradient applied was slightly modified from a previous study by Benton et al. [26] A mobile phase system consisted of two components, including 10% (v/v) acetonitrile in 1 M ammonium acetate–acetic acid buffer, pH 5.17 (solvent A), and 10% (v/v) acetonitrile in methanol (solvent B). The elution program started with 0% B, then increased linearly to 30% B within 15 min, followed by another linear increase to 90% B from 15 to 30 min. Mobile phase B was held at 90% until the end of the elution program (55 min).
A CMK-1A chromatographic marker, containing a Type I series of 8-carboxyl porphyrin (uroporphyrin), 7-carboxyl porphyrin (heptaporphyrin), 6-carboxyl porphyrin (hexaporphyrin), 5-carboxyl porphyrin (pentaporphyrin), and 4-carboxyl porphyrin (coproporphyrin), and mesoporphyrin IX, was purchased from Frontier Scientific (Logan, UT, USA). Two individual porphyrin standards; namely, uroporphyrin III tetramethyl ester and coproporphyrin III octamethyl ester, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).
HPLC-grade chemicals and reagents were used thoroughly for the analysis as components of mobile phases. Ammonium acetate, acetonitrile, methanol, and acetic acid were acquired from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water at 18 Ω was produced by a Smart2Pure 6 UV/UF ultrapure water system from Thermo Scientific (Langenselbold, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. HPLC Separation of Porphyrins

The reversed-phase HPLC paired with fluorescence detection allowed the simultaneous separation of a mixture of porphyrin standards used in this study (Figure 1). The chromatogram demonstrated the respective porphyrin isomers I and III in the series within 55 min. Depending upon the decreasing number of carboxylic acid groups attached to the basic porphine structure, the porphyrin isomers were sequentially eluted: uroporphyrin I (UPI), uroporphyrin III (UPIII), 7-carboxyl porphyrin (7PI), 6-carboxyl porphyrin (6PI), 5-carboxyl porphyrin (5PI), coproporphyrin I (CPI), coproporphyrin III (CPIII), and mesoporphyrin IX (MPIX). Although 2 peaks appeared during min 23–24, both were counted as 6PI. The separation of the 6PI into 2 peaks was feasibly affected by the difference in elution times between cis and trans isomers contained in the authentic 6PI [27]. The chemical structures of these isomers are shown in Figure 2.
The recorded UV–vis absorption spectra of each chromatographic peak of the porphyrin standard mixture (Figures S1–S9) were noted in terms of Soret band and Q bands (Table 1), according to electronic transitions from the ground state (S0) to the two lowest singlet excited states S1 and S2 (for a full explanation of the Soret band and Q bands, see Appendix A).

3.2. Identification of Red Pigments Produced by G. arilaitensis Strains

The G. arilaitensis cultured media contained in Petri dishes were selectively collected to get the maximum intensity of red pigments. After the extraction and purification, the extracts were analyzed using the described HPLC method. Three aspects, including fluorescent property, retention time, and UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded.
Besides their fluorescent property as displayed in Figure 3, pigments were identified based on their retention time and UV–vis spectra compared to those of authentic standards. Typical chromatograms of the extracts of each G. arilaitensis strain are shown in Figure 4.
According to the chromatographic profiles recorded at 400 nm excitation and 620 nm emission, compared with the retention time of the porphyrin standard mixture, eight porphyrin isomers were detected as components of red pigments produced by strains Re117, Po102, and Stp101. Among these components, only two isomers were displayed as major porphyrins following the figure of peaks presented on the chromatograms. The first peak was exhibited in a range of 32.75–32.79 min (Figure 4a–c), while the other was retained longer in the column and was eluted at min 45.37 (Figure 4b,c). The absorption spectra of these two principal peaks were composed of a Soret band and Q bands, as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
As shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, the spectral characteristics of the two major peaks perfectly matched those of CPIII and MPIX isomer standards; therefore, this could indicate that these G. arilaitensis strains predominantly produced CPIII and MPIX. However, there were differences in the production of porphyrins between these strains when we considered the pattern of chromatograms obtained from the HPLC analysis. CPIII was found to be the sole major porphyrin synthesized by the type strain G. arilaitensis Re117, whereas both CPIII and MPIX were exhibited in the extracts of G. arilaitensis Po102 and Stp101, but extremely high in G. arilaitensis Stp101. Other porphyrins, including UPI, UPIII, 7PI, 6PI, 5PI, and CPI, were present in trace amounts in the extracts of two strains, Po102 and Stp101, whereas the amount of MPIX was also low in the extract of the type strain Re117.

4. Discussion

The development of red/pink color in a variety of cheeses has long been reported as a defect that impacts the economic aspects of the cheese industry. In smear-ripened cheeses, pink/red-brown appearance—often called pink discoloration due to its undesirable characteristic relating to the quality of cheese—has been associated with certain microbial strains used as starter cultures for production. The mechanisms of color development of smear-ripening cheeses are still largely undefined because there are actions and correlations of a great number of microorganisms, both eukaryotes (primarily yeasts and molds) and prokaryotes (including pigmented and non-pigmented bacterial strains), during the cheese-making process [28].
For decades, only a few previous studies on the coloration of smear-ripening cheeses by G. arilaitensis were undertaken; thus, up to now, there are only two reports describing pink discoloration originated by this bacterial species. Recently, zinc CPIII was precisely characterized as a pink pigment produced by G. arilaitensis JB182, whereas in our earlier work, the red pigment extract of G. arilaitensis Po102 was assumed to be in a porphyrin cluster due to its characteristic UV–vis spectrum, which consists of two distinct regions in the near-ultraviolet and in the visible region, as well as its fluorescent property [19,20].
In this study, the pigments extracted from cultured media of G. arilaitensis strains, including the type strains Re117, Po102, and Stp101, originating from smear-ripened cheeses were qualitatively identified by an HPLC methodology. Via fluorescence detector and PDA, the red pigments were appropriately separated and able to be predicated. Based on the data of the absorption spectra and the elution order obtained from HPLC analysis, which matched against those of the standards, eight porphyrins were distinguished from the red-pigmented extracts of these three G. arilaitensis strains. As described in several experiments, it has been strongly suggested that changes in the conjugation pathway and symmetry of porphyrin can affect its UV–vis absorption spectra [29,30,31]. Mason et al. [32] reported that chelation of zinc by coproporphyrin excreted by Actinomycetes strains would extend retention time to slightly more polar elution and shift absorption spectra profile with a Soret band to a higher wavelength than the metal-free porphyrin. Lately, a similar phenomenon was found by Cleary et al. [20], who observed a pink pigment produced by a smeared-cheese bacterial G. arilaitensis strain. According to the results of LC-MS/MS analysis, the pigment was characterized to be zinc-bound coproporphyrin III, as its Soret band shifted from 393 nm to 405 nm compared to the standard, which made it fit the description of zinc coproporphyrin III profiles. In addition, a study by Rostami et al. [33] reported a significant difference in the number of Q bands between free base porphyrins and metalloporphyrins, in that the metal-free porphyrins consisted of four peaks in the Q band region, while only two peaks were found from metalloporphyrins. Consequently, due to the fine compatibility with the standards and nonappearance of shifting in retention time and Soret band in their absorption-spectra profiles, the porphyrins by the G. arilaitensis strains studied (Re117, Po102, and Stp101) were affirmatively in metal-free forms; namely, UPI, UPIII, 7PI, 6PI, 5PI, CPI, CPIII, and MPIX. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the simultaneous presence of eight metal-free porphyrins synthesized by the cheese-ripening bacterial strain G. arilaitensis was disclosed. Apart from these porphyrin isomers, it seemed that the three strains of G. arilaitensis also produced porphyrins in other forms, since there were several detectable peaks presented on the chromatograms. Among these peaks, some of them had enough intensity to display the fine absorption spectra (data not shown); for example, the peak of the extract of G. arilaitensis Stp101 that was eluted after MPIX (Rt 51.59 min), and peaks detected between Rt 32.75 and Rt 45.37 min of the injection of G. arilaitensis Po102 extract. Unfortunately, due to a limitation of available porphyrin standards, these peaks could not be identified in the current work.
Among microorganisms, several bacteria in the genus Arthobacter—of which certain strains were recently identified to belong to the genus Glutamicibacter, including A. arilaitensis—are reported for their abilities to synthesize pigments in porphyrin clusters [34]. Based on enzymes responsible for porphyrin biosynthesis, naturally occurring metal-free porphyrins exist only in type I and III isomer forms; nonetheless, CPIII and UPIII were shown to be the major porphyrins produced by Arthrobacter sp. [20,35,36,37,38,39]. In bacteria, these pigmented molecules are intermediate metabolites significantly involved in parts of energy-conserving electron-transport chains and co-factors of various enzymes; however, metal ions are required to chelate with the tetrapyrroles and bind to a specific protein for activating these functions [40,41]. Changes in physical and biochemical conditions usually induce an adaptation of bacterial energy metabolism, and often correspond to a huge alteration in the production of porphyrin [42,43].
Considering the accumulation of porphyrins in smear-ripened cheeses, microbial interactions are potential factors that affect these pink-pigmented compounds. For instance, CPIII formed in the presence of the Penicillium sp. when cultivated on blue cheese curd agar; thereby, it was described as part of the inhibitory effect of G. arilaitensis on Penicillium [20,44]. Two presumptions that could explain this phenomenon are the following: (1) the competition for metal ions between the bacterium and the fungus feasibly induces G. arilaitensis to produce CPIII, and (2) the fungus establishes a suitable environment enhancing the production of CPIII by G. arilaitensis. However, since all porphyrins identified from the Re117, Po102, and Stp101 strains in this study were in metal-free forms, the concept that the fungus provides a unique environment for the synthesis of porphyrins by G. arilaitensis seems to be a promising condition for this circumstance. This aligns with previous bacterium–fungus RNA-seq experiments in the interaction between bacterial and fungal strains isolated from cheese rind that expresses a significant increase in nutrient availability through proteolysis of cheese curd by fungi [20,45].
The pathway of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in most bacteria proceeds by synthesizing a precursor metabolite, ẟ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), from glutamate that binds glutamyl-tRNA by a glutamyl-tRNA-catalyzed reaction, then continues to synthesize intermediate metabolites, including porphobilinogen, uroporphyrinogen III, coproporphyrinogen III, protoporphyrinogen IX, protoporphyrin IX, and heme, respectively [46]. Metal-free porphyrins excreted by the G. arilatensis strains in this study were therefore not normal intermediate metabolites. Compared with hemes, metal-free porphyrins have not yet been shown to have a biological function, but the cell synthetic pathways have been interrupted. The pathways leading to functional tetrapyrroles; e.g., cytochromes, redox-active proteins containing a heme, have been blocked, thus engaging in the formation of one of the earlier intermediates [47,48]. Besides, such interaction requires a compatible set of catalysts for each tetrapyrrole synthesis, so there will be a difference in the yield of each porphyrin depending on the type of enzyme synthesized by each bacterial strain [49,50]. This may describe the difference of the patterns of porphyrin formation by G. arilaitensis Re117, Po102, and Stp101, in that only CPIII was predominantly produced by the type strain Re117, while MPIX was found to be a major red pigment of strain Stp101, and ranged in the second of which by the strain Po102. The occurrence of MPIX was doubtful, since this molecule is not an intermediate in the biosynthesis of heme. It probably is related to the conversion of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) into the more stable forms. In a study by Brazier [51], it was explained that PPIX is a labile structure with two vinyl side chains that incline to bacterial degradation; therefore, PPIX will be denatured and turn into MPIX.
Besides the carotenoids previously characterized and porphyrins identified in this study, interestingly, it seemed that the G. arilaitensis strains produced other fluorescent pigments. Corresponding to Figure 2, a small number of bands were found to express their fluorescent properties in a range of wavelengths between 200–400 nm at the beginning of the HPLC running program. Riboflavin could hypothetically be among these pigments due to its fluorescent property and the wavelength at which absorption occurs, and following several reports that found the ability of bacteria in the genus Arthrobacter to produce this vitamin [34,52].

5. Conclusions

Using the occurrence of pink discoloration during our previous study of the effect of certain factors on the coloration of G. arilaitensis strain isolated from smear-ripening cheese, this work aimed to identify the pink/red-brown pigments produced by this bacterial species. The pigments extracted from a dry matter of the cheese-based (curd) solid medium cultured with either G. arilaitensis Re117, Po102, or Stp101 were characterized using HPLC equipped with fluorescence and diode array detectors. The pigmented extracts were well separated by the analytical conditions applied, and their chromatographic profiles were then compared to one of the porphyrin standard mixtures. Based on the characteristics of absorption spectra and retention time, it was found that the pink pigments synthesized by these G. arilaitensis strains under the studied conditions were composed of eight metal-free porphyrins, including UPI, UPIII, 7PI, 6PI, 5PI, CPI, CPIII, and MPIX. Considering the HPLC chromatograms, the degree of each porphyrin production was different. Regardless of precise quantitative measurement, the type strains Re117 and Po102 exhibited an ability to produce a high amount of CPIII, whereas MPIX was obviously formed by the strains Po102 and Stp101, but distinctly high by the strain Stp101.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/dairy2030031/s1, Figure S1: UV–vis spectra of authentic uroporphyrin I (UPI), Figure S2: UV–vis spectra of authentic uroporphyrin III (UPIII), Figure S3: UV–vis spectra of authentic 7-carboxyl porphyrin (7PI), Figure S4: UV–vis spectra of authentic 6-carboxyl porphyrin (6PI), Figure S5. UV–vis spectra of authentic 6-carboxyl porphyrin (6PI) peak 2, Figure S6: UV–vis spectra of authentic 5-carboxyl porphyrin (5PI), Figure S7: UV–vis spectra of authentic coproporphyrin I (CPI), Figure S8: UV–vis spectra of authentic coproporphyrin III (CPIII), Figure S9: UV–vis spectra of authentic mesoporphyrin IX (MPIX).

Author Contributions

N.S. and L.D. designed the study; N.S., P.S. and S.L. performed the experiments; N.S., S.L. and L.D. interpreted the results; N.S. drafted the manuscript; L.D. revised the article critically. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Thailand, grant number SCH-NR2015-373. Laurent Dufossé (L.D.) is very grateful to the Conseil Régional de Bretagne and the Conseil Régional de La Réunion for funding research programs dedicated to cheese microbiology and pigment production by dairy microorganisms.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Marie-Noëlle Leclercq-Perlat, INRA—Unité Mixte de Recherche, Génie et Microbiologie des Procédés Alimentaires, Centre de Biotechnologies Agro-Industrielles, 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France, for providing bacterial and yeast strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The characteristic of UV–vis spectra of porphyrins that has been well recognized is that it consists of two distinct regions. Theoretically, this is a result of the change in electronic transitions from the ground state (S0) to the two lowest singlet excited states S1 and S2. The S0 → S1 transition allows a rise to weak Q bands in the visible region, while the S0 → S2 transition performs a strong Soret band in the near-ultraviolet region [29]. Corresponding to different vibrational modes in which the second excited singlet state (S2) can decline to the first excited singlet state (S1) and afterward undergo intersystem crossing to the first excited triplet state, the Q band comprises multiple peaks [33]. A typical porphyrin contains a very strong absorption of around 400 nm in the light spectrum, and several weaker absorptions between 450 and 700 nm.
Figure A1. Typical absorption spectra of porphyrins [53].
Figure A1. Typical absorption spectra of porphyrins [53].
Dairy 02 00031 g0a1

References

  1. Mounier, J.; Goerges, S.; Gelsomino, R.; Vancanneyt, M.; Vandemeulebroecke, K.; Hoste, B.; Brennen, N.M.; Scherer, S.; Swings, J.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; et al. Sources of the adventitious microflora of a smear-ripened cheese. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ritschard, J.S.; Amato, L.; Kumar, Y.; Müller, B.; Meile, L.; Schuppler, M. The role of the surface smear microbiome in the development of defective smear on surface-ripened red-smear cheese. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 622–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Speight, K.C.; Schiano, A.N.; Harwood, W.S.; Drake, M.A. Consumer insights on prepackaged cheddar cheese shreds using focus groups, conjoint analysis, and qualitative multivariate analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 6971–6986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Daly, D.F.M.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; Sheehan, J.J. Pink discoloration defect in commercial cheese: A review. Dairy Sci. Technol. 2012, 92, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bottazzi, V.; Cappa, F.; Scolari, G.; Parisi, M.G. Occurring of pink discoloration in Grana cheese made with one-strain starter culture. Sci. Tec. Latt. Casearia 2000, 51, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  6. Marley, F.G.; Michel, V. Pinkish colouration in Cheddar cheese—Description and factors contributing to its formation. J. Dairy Res. 2001, 68, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Andersen, C.M.; Wold, J.P.; Mortensen, G. Light-induced changes in semi-hard cheese determined by fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 1483–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guiliano, G.; Rosati, C.; Bramly, P.M. To dye or not to dye: Biochemistry of annatto unveiled. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 513–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharma, P.; Segat, A.; Kelly, A.; Sheehan, J.J. Colorants in cheese manufacture: Production, chemistry, interaction, and regulation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 1220–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, D.J.; Daly, D.; O’Sullivan, O.; Burdikova, Z.; Vana, R.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; McSweeney, P.L.H.; et al. Thermus and the pink discoloration defect in cheese. Appl. Environ. Sci. 2016, 1, e00023-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bockelmann, W. Smear-ripened cheeses. In Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, 2nd ed.; Fox, P.F., McSweeney, P.L.H., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 753–766. [Google Scholar]
  12. Flegler, A.; Runzheimer, K.; Kombeitz, V.; Mänz, A.T.; von Heilborn, D.H.; Etzbach, L.; Schieber, A.; Hőlzl, G.; Hüttler, B.; Woehle, C.; et al. Arthrobacter bussei sp. nov., a pink-colored organism isolated from cheese made of cow’s milk. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 3027–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arai, A.; Igoshi, A.; Inoue, A.; Noda, K.; Tsutsuura, S.; Murata, M. Relationship between lactose utilization of lactic acid bacteria and browning of cheese during storage. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2020, 84, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jonnala, B.R.Y. Pink Discoloration in Cheese. Ph.D. Thesis, University College, London, UK, 14 January 2020. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10468/9501 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  15. Larpin-Laborde, S.; Imran, M.; Bonaïti, C.; Bora, N.; Gelsomino, R.; Goerges, S.; Irlinger, F.; Goodfellow, M.; Ward, A.C.; Vancanneyt, M.; et al. Surface microbial consortia from Livarot, a French smear-ripened cheese. Can. J. Microbiol. 2011, 57, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Irlinger, F.; Bimet, G.; Delettre, J.; Lefèvre, M.; Grimont, P.A.D. Arhtrobacter bergerei sp. nov. and Arthrobacter arilaitensis sp. nov., novel corynform species isolated from the surface of cheeses. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sutthiwong, S.; Dufossé, L. Production of carotenoids by Arthrobacter arilaitensis strains isolated from smear-ripened cheeses. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Guiffrida, D.; Sutthiwong, N.; Dugo, P.; Donato, P.; Cacciola, F.; Girad-Valenciennes, E.; Le Mao, Y.; Monnet, C.; Fouillaud, M.; Caro, Y.; et al. Characterisation of the C50 carotenoids produced by strains of the cheese-ripening bacterium Arthrobacter arilaitensis. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 55, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sutthiwong, N.; Fouillaud, M.; Dufossé, L. The influence of pH, NaCl and the deacidifying yeasts Debaryomyces hansenii and Kluyveromyces marxianus on the production of pigments by the cheese-ripening bacteria Arthobacter arilaitensis. Foods 2018, 7, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Cleary, J.L.; Kolachina, S.; Wolfe, B.E.; Sanchez, L.M. Coproporphyrins III produced by the bacterium Glutamicibacter arilaitensis binds zinc and is upregulated by fungi in cheese rinds. Appl. Environ. Sci. 2018, 3, e0036-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dong, M.W. The essence of modern HPLC: Advantages, limitations, fundamentals, and opportunities. LCGC North Am. 2013, 31, 472–479. [Google Scholar]
  22. Núñez, O.; Lucci, P. Application of liquid chromatography in food analysis. Foods 2020, 9, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Galaup, P.; Sutthiwong, N.; Leclercq-Perlat, M.-N.; Valla, A.; Caro, Y.; Fouillaud, M.; Guérard, F.; Dufossé, L. First isolation of Brevibacterium sp. pigments in the rind of an industrial red-smear-ripened soft cheese. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2015, 68, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kumura, H.; Ohtsuyama, T.; Taitoh, M.; Koyanagi, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Wakamatsu, J.-I.; Ishizuka, S. Application of red pigment producing edible fungi for development of a novel type of functional cheese. J. Food Process Preserv. 2018, e13707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Larroude, M.; Onésime, D.; Rué, O.; Nicaud, J.-M.; Rossignol, T. A Yarrowia lipolytica engineered for pyomelanin production. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Benton, C.M.; Lim, C.K. Liquid chromatography: Porphyrins. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 3rd ed.; Worsfold, P.J., Poole, C.F., Townshend, A., Miró, M., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 209–230. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vogelsang, D.F.; Maleczka, R.E., Jr.; Lee, A. HPLC characterization of cis and trans mixtures of double-decker shaped silsesquioxanes. Silicon 2018, 11, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Irlinger, F.; Layec, S.; Hélinck, S.; Dugat-Bony, E. Cheese rind microbial communities: Diversity, composition and origin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Giovannetti, R. The use of spectrophotometry UV-Vis for the study of porphyrins. In Macro to Nano Spectroscopy, 1st ed.; Uddin, J., Ed.; IntechOpen Ltd.: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Valicsek, Z.; Horváth, O. Application of the electronic spectra of porphyrins for analytical purposes: The effects of metal ions and structural distortions. Microchem. J. 2013, 107, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mamardashvili, G.M.; Lazovskiy, D.A.; Khodov, I.A.; Efimov, A.E.; Mamardashvil, N.Z. New polyporphyrin arrays with controlled fluorescence obtained by diaxial Sn(IV)-porphyrin phenolates chelation with Cu2+ cation. Polymers 2021, 13, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mason, M.G.; Ball, A.S.; Reeder, B.J.; Silkstone, G.; Nicholls, P.; Wilson, M.T. Extracellular heme peroxidases in Actinomycetes: A case of mistaken identity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 4512–4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Rostami, M.; Rafiee, L.; Hassanzadeh, F.; Dadrass, A.R.; Ghadam, A.K. Synthesis of some new porphyrins and their metalloderivatives as potential sensitizers in photo-dynamic therapy. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 504–513. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sutthiwong, N.; Fouillaud, M.; Valla, A.; Caro, Y.; Dufossé, L. Bacteria belonging to the extremely versatile genus Arthrobacter as novel source of natural pigments with extended hue range. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lesage, S.; Xu, H.; Durham, L. The occurrence and roles of porphyrins in the environment: Possible implications for bioremediation. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1993, 38, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kojima, I.; Maruhashi, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Saito, T.; Kajiwara, M.; Mizutani, M. Identification of porphyrins produced from isopropanol by Arthrobacter hyalinus. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1993, 75, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Scharf, R.; Mamet, R.; Zimmels, Y.; Kimchie, S.; Schoenfeld, N. Evidence for the interference of aluminum with bacterial porphyrin biosynthesis. Biometals 1994, 7, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kajiwara, M.; Tokiwa, S.; Takatori, K.; Kojima, I. Properties of zinc uroporphyrin III produced from isopropanol by Arthrobacter hyalinus. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1995, 79, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, H.-S.; Hoober, J.K. Divergent pathways for δ-aminolevulinic acid synthesis in two species of Arthrobacter. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 134, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chaves, J.C.A.; Gregorutti dos Santos, C.; Aparecida de Miranda, E.G.; Arantes Junior, J.T.; Nantes, I.L. Free-base and metal complexes of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(NMethyl Pyridinium L)porphyrin: Catalytic and therapeutic properties. In Phthalocyanines and Some Current Applications; Yilmaz, Y., Ed.; IntechOpen Ltd.: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pérez-Urria, E.; Avalos, A. Approach to a comparative study of the metabolism of porphyrins and chlorophylls. J. Nat. Sci. 2015, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Schobert, M.; Jahn, D. Regulation of heme biosynthesis in non-phototrophic bacteria. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 4, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, J.; Kang, Z.; Chen, J.; Du, G. Optimization of the heme biosynthesis pathway for the production of 5-aminolevulinic acid in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wolfe, B.E.; Button, J.E.; Santarelli, M.; Dutton, R.J. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cells 2014, 158, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kastman, E.K.; Kamelamela, N.; Norville, J.W.; Cosetta, C.M.; Dutton, R.J.; Wolfe, B.E. Biotic interactions shape the ecological distributions of staphylococcus species. mBio 2016, 7, e01157-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Frankenberg, N.; Moser, J.; Jahn, D. Bacterial heme biosynthesis and its biotechnological application. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Middleton, K.S.; Gunner, H.B. Porphyrin production by Arthrobacter globiformis. Can. J. Microbiol. 1968, 14, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kortsee, G.J.J. Porphyrin Formation and Its Regulation in Arthrobacter. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bonkovsky, H.L.; Guo, J.-T.; Hou, W.; Li, T.; Narang, T.; Thapar, M. Porphyrin and Heme Metabolism and the Porphyrias. Compr. Physiol. 2013, 3, 365–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kwon, S.J.; de Boer, A.L.; Petri, R.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. High-level production of porphyrins in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli: Systematic extension of a pathway assembled from overexpressed genes involved in heme biosynthesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4875–4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Brazier, J.S. Analysis of the porphyrin content of fluorescent pus by absorption spectrophotometry and high performance liquid chromatography. J. Med. Microbiol. 1990, 33, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yamane, Y.; Ooshima, H.; Kato, J. Overproduction of riboflavin by an Arthrobacter sp. mutant resistant to 5-fluorouracil. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1993, 15, 877–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Josefsen, L.B.; Boyle, R.W. Photodynamic therapy and the development of metal-based photosensitisers. Met. Based Drugs 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. HPLC chromatographic profile of a porphyrin standard mixture. UPI: uroporphyrin I; UPIII: uroporphyrin III; 7PI: 7-carboxyl porphyrin; 6PI: 6-carboxyl porphyrin; 5PI: 5-carboxyl porphyrin; CPI: coproporphyrin I; CPIII: coproporphyrin III; MPIX: mesoporphyrin IX.
Figure 1. HPLC chromatographic profile of a porphyrin standard mixture. UPI: uroporphyrin I; UPIII: uroporphyrin III; 7PI: 7-carboxyl porphyrin; 6PI: 6-carboxyl porphyrin; 5PI: 5-carboxyl porphyrin; CPI: coproporphyrin I; CPIII: coproporphyrin III; MPIX: mesoporphyrin IX.
Dairy 02 00031 g001
Figure 2. Structures of the porphyrin isomers. The β-positions of the four pyrrole rings are substituted with acetic acid (Ac), propionic acid (Pr), methyl (Me), and ethyl (Et). UPI: uroporphyrin I; UPIII: uroporphyrin III; 7PI: 7-carboxyl porphyrin; 6PI: 6-carboxyl porphyrin; 5PI: 5-carboxyl porphyrin; CPI: coproporphyrin I; CPIII: coproporphyrin III; MPIX: mesoporphyrin IX.
Figure 2. Structures of the porphyrin isomers. The β-positions of the four pyrrole rings are substituted with acetic acid (Ac), propionic acid (Pr), methyl (Me), and ethyl (Et). UPI: uroporphyrin I; UPIII: uroporphyrin III; 7PI: 7-carboxyl porphyrin; 6PI: 6-carboxyl porphyrin; 5PI: 5-carboxyl porphyrin; CPI: coproporphyrin I; CPIII: coproporphyrin III; MPIX: mesoporphyrin IX.
Dairy 02 00031 g002
Figure 3. Fluorescent properties of porphyrin standard mixture (a) and red pigments extracted of G. arilaitensis strains, including (b) Re117, (c) Po102, and (d) Stp101.
Figure 3. Fluorescent properties of porphyrin standard mixture (a) and red pigments extracted of G. arilaitensis strains, including (b) Re117, (c) Po102, and (d) Stp101.
Dairy 02 00031 g003
Figure 4. HPLC chromatographic profiles of red pigments extracted of G. arilaitensis strains, including (a) Re117, (b) Po102, and (c) Stp101.
Figure 4. HPLC chromatographic profiles of red pigments extracted of G. arilaitensis strains, including (a) Re117, (b) Po102, and (c) Stp101.
Dairy 02 00031 g004aDairy 02 00031 g004b
Figure 5. Comparison of absorption spectra of porphyrin standard, CPIII, and chromatographic peaks of the extracts exhibited at Rt about 32 min: (a) CPIII standard; (b) G. arilaitensis Re117 at Rt 32.75 min; (c) G. arilaitensis Po102 at Rt 32.75 min; (d) G. arilaitensis Stp101 at Rt 32.79 min.
Figure 5. Comparison of absorption spectra of porphyrin standard, CPIII, and chromatographic peaks of the extracts exhibited at Rt about 32 min: (a) CPIII standard; (b) G. arilaitensis Re117 at Rt 32.75 min; (c) G. arilaitensis Po102 at Rt 32.75 min; (d) G. arilaitensis Stp101 at Rt 32.79 min.
Dairy 02 00031 g005aDairy 02 00031 g005b
Figure 6. Comparison of absorption spectra of porphyrin standard, MPIX, and chromatographic peaks of the extracts exhibited at Rt about 45 min: (a) MPIX standard; (b) G. arilaitensis Po102 at Rt 45.37 min; (c) G. arilaitensis Stp101at Rt 45.37 min.
Figure 6. Comparison of absorption spectra of porphyrin standard, MPIX, and chromatographic peaks of the extracts exhibited at Rt about 45 min: (a) MPIX standard; (b) G. arilaitensis Po102 at Rt 45.37 min; (c) G. arilaitensis Stp101at Rt 45.37 min.
Dairy 02 00031 g006
Table 1. Chromatographic and spectral properties of porphyrin standards.
Table 1. Chromatographic and spectral properties of porphyrin standards.
PorphyrinsRt (min)Soret Band λ (nm)Q Band λ (nm)
UPI9.28398501, 537, 563, 615
UPIII9.68398501, 537, 563, 615
7PI16.26397500, 536, 563, 615
6PI23.06 396500, 535, 564, 616
24.14396500, 534, 564, 616
5PI28.60394450, 533, 564, 617
CPI31.77393497, 532, 564, 616
CPIII32.76393497, 532, 564, 617
MPIX43.35392496, 530, 565, 618
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sutthiwong, N.; Sukdee, P.; Lekhavat, S.; Dufossé, L. Identification of Red Pigments Produced by Cheese-Ripening Bacterial Strains of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Using HPLC. Dairy 2021, 2, 396-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy2030031

AMA Style

Sutthiwong N, Sukdee P, Lekhavat S, Dufossé L. Identification of Red Pigments Produced by Cheese-Ripening Bacterial Strains of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Using HPLC. Dairy. 2021; 2(3):396-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy2030031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sutthiwong, Nuthathai, Piyada Sukdee, Supaporn Lekhavat, and Laurent Dufossé. 2021. "Identification of Red Pigments Produced by Cheese-Ripening Bacterial Strains of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Using HPLC" Dairy 2, no. 3: 396-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy2030031

APA Style

Sutthiwong, N., Sukdee, P., Lekhavat, S., & Dufossé, L. (2021). Identification of Red Pigments Produced by Cheese-Ripening Bacterial Strains of Glutamicibacter arilaitensis Using HPLC. Dairy, 2(3), 396-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy2030031

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop