Next Article in Journal
How Anxious and Stressed Are Emerging Adults? The Role of Mindfulness and Intolerance of Uncertainty
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial to the Special Issue “Feature Papers in Psychometrics and Educational Measurement”
 
 
Psych concluded publication with Volume 6, Issue 1. It has been succeeded by Psychology International, which has a revised scope and a new editorial direction and is now published here. To preserve historical data integrity, the information on this webpage is retained but will no longer be updated.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Number of Factors to Retain with Exploratory Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data

Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN47306, USA
Psych 2023, 5(3), 1004-1018; https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067
Submission received: 9 August 2023 / Revised: 5 September 2023 / Accepted: 7 September 2023 / Published: 13 September 2023

Abstract

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a very widely used statistical procedure in the social and behavioral sciences. This technique features in validity studies, as well as investigations of latent structure underlying observed measurements. A primary aspect of using EFA is determining the number of factors to retain. In addition to theoretical considerations, a variety of statistical tools have been developed and recommended for use in assisting researchers with respect to factor retention. Some research has been conducted to investigate the accuracy of these methods in the case of continuous factor indicators. The purpose of the current simulation study was to extend this earlier work to situations in which the indicator variables are dichotomous, as with questionnaire or test items. Results of this study revealed that an approach based on the combined results of the empirical Kaiser criterion, comparative data, and Hull methods, as well as Gorsuch’s CNG scree plot test by itself, all yielded accurate results with respect to the number of factors to retain. Implications for practice are discussed.
Keywords: exploratory factor analysis; factor number; dichotomous data exploratory factor analysis; factor number; dichotomous data

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Finch, W.H. A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Number of Factors to Retain with Exploratory Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data. Psych 2023, 5, 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067

AMA Style

Finch WH. A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Number of Factors to Retain with Exploratory Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data. Psych. 2023; 5(3):1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Finch, W. Holmes. 2023. "A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Number of Factors to Retain with Exploratory Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data" Psych 5, no. 3: 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067

APA Style

Finch, W. H. (2023). A Comparison of Methods for Determining the Number of Factors to Retain with Exploratory Factor Analysis of Dichotomous Data. Psych, 5(3), 1004-1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030067

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop