Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Atmospheric Circulation Regimes for Wildfire, Flood and Rainfall Extremes in Greece
Previous Article in Journal
A New Catalogue of Historical Eruptions in Santorini Volcano: Documentation and Completeness Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Communicating the “Last Mile” of Seismic Risk: Insights from a Case Study

1
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Osservatorio Nazionale Terremoti, 16145 Genoa, Italy
3
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Sezione Irpinia, 83035 Grottaminarda, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GeoHazards 2026, 7(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020072
Submission received: 4 May 2026 / Revised: 5 June 2026 / Accepted: 9 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026

Abstract

Earthquake risk communication often remains centered on event parameters and structural collapse, while local site effects, building response and non-structural elements vulnerability shape how earthquakes are experienced and what people can do to reduce risk. This study examines whether a multi-modal, experience-based strategy focused on these dimensions, which are referred to as “last mile” of seismic risk, can improve public understanding and support actionable preparedness behaviors. The case study is the exhibition “Terremoti: Attenti agli Elementi!—Dettagli che salvano la vita” (Earthquakes: Beware of the Elements!—Details that Save Lives), designed for school audiences and the general public. Its effectiveness was assessed through five multiple-choice questions administered before (N = 183) and after (N = 174) the visit to the Genoa Science Festival; responses were analyzed overall and by topic and demographic group. Correct answers increased significantly from pre- to post-visit, with the largest gains concerning local site effects (+43.29%) and household prevention measures (+49.45%), whereas building vulnerability (+14.97%) and building dynamic response (+0.49%) showed more limited improvement. These exploratory results suggest that seismic risk communication is more effective when abstract concepts are translated into observable, manipulable, and everyday experiences, and support a shift toward a “last-mile” framework of seismic risk communication.
Keywords: seismic risk prevention; seismic risk awareness; seismic risk education; seismic risk communication seismic risk prevention; seismic risk awareness; seismic risk education; seismic risk communication

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Musacchio, G.; Eva, E.; Meroni, F.; Solarino, S.; Zarrilli, L. Communicating the “Last Mile” of Seismic Risk: Insights from a Case Study. GeoHazards 2026, 7, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020072

AMA Style

Musacchio G, Eva E, Meroni F, Solarino S, Zarrilli L. Communicating the “Last Mile” of Seismic Risk: Insights from a Case Study. GeoHazards. 2026; 7(2):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Musacchio, Gemma, Elena Eva, Fabrizio Meroni, Stefano Solarino, and Luigi Zarrilli. 2026. "Communicating the “Last Mile” of Seismic Risk: Insights from a Case Study" GeoHazards 7, no. 2: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020072

APA Style

Musacchio, G., Eva, E., Meroni, F., Solarino, S., & Zarrilli, L. (2026). Communicating the “Last Mile” of Seismic Risk: Insights from a Case Study. GeoHazards, 7(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020072

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop