Patterns and Prediction of Thaw Settlement and Thaw Compression in Permafrost
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Regional Background
3. Data Sources and Methods
3.1. Experimental Methods and Apparatus
3.2. Methodology for Constructing a Prediction Model for Melting-Compression Coefficient and Post-Thaw Compressive Strain
4. Research Results
4.1. Thaw-Settlement Coefficient Measurements
4.2. Thaw-Compression Coefficient Determinations
4.3. Effect of Thaw Proportion of Thaw Settlement
4.3.1. Effect of Soil Type on Proportion of Melting Settlement
4.3.2. Effect of Natural Water Content on Proportion of Thaw Settlement
4.3.3. Effect of Dry Density on Proportion of Melting and Settling
4.4. Criteria for Onset of Significant Compressive Deformation Under Load–Porosity Conditions
5. Analysis of Thaw-Settlement Coefficient and Post-Thaw Compressive-Strain Prediction Models
5.1. Comparative Analysis of Prediction Performance for Different Machine Learning Models
5.2. Comparison and Analysis of Empirical Models
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Qu, H.; Tang, A.; Zhao, A.; Mu, D.; Wang, Z. A unified theoretical thaw expansion and settlement coefficient model for frozen soil. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 2025, 39, 04025008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, L.; Wang, S.J.; Chen, J.B.; Duan, K. Study on the thawing compression deformation mechanism of ice-rich frozen soil. J. Highw. Transp. Res. Dev. (Engl. Ed.) 2013, 7, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi, Z.; Hayley, J.L. Compilation and analysis of thaw settlement test results: Implications for prediction tools and stress–strain characterization in permafrost. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 3921–3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; Mu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Y. Characteristics and mechanisms of embankment deformation along the Qinghai–Tibet Railway in permafrost regions. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2011, 67, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Yu, W.; Hu, D.; Lu, Y.; Chen, L.; Yi, X.; Han, F. Crack damage investigation of paved highway embankment in the Tibetan Plateau permafrost environments. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2019, 163, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, G.Q.; Yang, P.; He, W.L.; Zhang, C.J. Experimental study on thermophysical properties of marine artificial frozen soil. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2017, 41, 170–176. [Google Scholar]
- Bi, G.Q.; Xiong, M.; Chai, M.T.; Hu, Y.; Yu, H. Mechanical experimental study on undisturbed soil at different depths in permafrost regions. J. Lanzhou Univ. Technol. 2023, 49, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Hu, J.; Shi, J.; Xiang, H.; Xia, J. Study on Frost Heave and Thaw Settlement Characteristics of Sanya Estuary Channel Soil Layer. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, D.; Yu, Q.; Meng, X. Experimental study of thaw settlement and internal structural changes in frozen soil during the thawing process. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 22, e04279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, M.; Jia, M. Macro-microscopic deformation evolution of thawing frozen fine-grained soil used in heavy-haul railway subgrades in cold regions. Res. Cold Arid Reg. 2025, 17, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joudieh, Z.; Cuisinier, O.; Abdallah, A.; Masrouri, F. Impact of overburden pressure on the thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior of silty sand during a freeze-thaw cycle in the context of Artificial Ground Freezing. Eng. Geol. 2025, 350, 107992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, H.C. Experimental Study on Thaw Compression Characteristics of Remolded Frozen Soil. Master’s Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.X.; Song, Y.W.; Yang, H. Study on the influence of load and fine particle content on frost heave and thaw settlement of saturated sandy gravel. Rock Soil Mech. 2022, 43, 213–221. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M.Z.; Tan, Y.Z.; Wu, P.; Yang, A.W. Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on compression characteristics of improved soft clay. J. Guangxi Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2015, 40, 208–212. [Google Scholar]
- Jiao, C.; Niu, F.; Luo, J.; He, P.; Yu, F. Quantifying freeze-thaw erosion dynamics in retrogressive thaw slumps: Integrating geophysical and experimental approaches. Catena 2025, 261, 109543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Yang, P.; Yang, Z. Experimental study on deformation characteristics of chloride silty clay during freeze-thaw in an open system. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2022, 197, 103518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derk, L.; Unold, F. Effect of temperature gradients on water migration, frost heave and thaw-settlement of a clay during freezing-thaw process. Exp. Heat Transf. 2023, 36, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B. Thaw-settlement characteristics and engineering countermeasures of island permafrost in Tieli-Yichun High-Speed Railway. Railw. Eng. 2022, 62, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.H.; Cai, D.G.; Yan, H.Y.; Bi, Z.Q.; Li, Z.Q. Study on engineering characteristics and time-varying model of island permafrost in high-speed railway subgrade. J. China Railw. Soc. 2026, 48, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.W. Test on frost heave and thaw settlement characteristics of Shijiazhuang-Taiyuan passenger dedicated line subgrade and frost damage control measures. Railw. Qual. Control 2023, 51, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Z.Z.; Wang, M.; Ni, B. Study on thaw-settlement characteristics of weak expansive soil in Huainan. Jiangsu Build. Mater. 2022, 189, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, X.H.; Gong, N.; Wang, W. Experimental study on thaw-settlement characteristics of silty clay in permafrost regions. Munic. Technol. 2022, 40, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, J.; Tang, Y. Centrifuge experimental study of thaw settlement characteristics of mucky clay after artificial ground freezing. Eng. Geol. 2015, 190, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Zhao, W.; Tang, Y. Practical prediction method on thaw deformation of soft clay subject to artificial ground freezing based on elaborate centrifuge modeling experiments. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2022, 122, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, X.L.; Ma, J.R.; Huang, L. Experimental study on artificial frozen soil thaw settlement and prediction of thaw settlement coefficient. J. Min. Saf. Eng. 2015, 32, 996–1003. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.B.; Yang, P. Prediction method of frozen soil thaw settlement coefficient based on BP artificial neural network. For. Eng. 2008, 24, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, X.L.; Qi, J.L. Artificial neural network prediction method for thaw settlement coefficient. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2011, 33, 891–896. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.L.; Wang, W. Experimental study on thaw settlement characteristics and influencing factors of silty clay in Changchun area. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2020, 20, 14854–14861. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, G.; Xie, Y.; Wei, J.; Yue, X. Experimental study and prediction model on frost heave and thawing settlement deformation of subgrade soil in alpine meadow area of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.H.; Mi, W.J.; Wu, X.P.; Miao, X.Y. Sensitivity Analysis of Influencing Factors on Thaw Settlement Coefficient of Silty Clay Based on Grey Relational Analysis. Constr. Technol. 2016, 45, 353–355. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Z.J.; Tang, P.X.; Yan, K.Z. Prediction of Freeze-Thaw Coefficient Based on Gene Expression Programming Algorithm. J. Ningxia Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2013, 34, 147–150. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, J.; Cui, F.; Zhu, W.; Liu, J.; Yu, H. Risk Zoning of Permafrost Thaw Settlement in the Qinghai–Tibet Engineering Corridor. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, J.; Roustaei, M.; Pumple, J.; Francis, E.; Froese, D. Estimation of Excess Ice and Thaw Settlement in Frozen Soil Using Industrial Computed Tomography. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 2026, 37, 254–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.Y.; Ma, P.D. Discrimination of Permafrost Thaw-Settlement Classes Based on Fisher Discriminant Method. J. Changchun Inst. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 24, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T 50145-2007; Standard for Engineering Classification of Soils. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2007.
- GB 50324-2014; Code for Geotechnical Investigation of Frozen Ground. China Planning Press: Beijing, China, 2014.
- GB/T 50123-2019; Standard for Geotechnical Testing Methods. China Planning Press: Beijing, China, 2019.
- He, P.; Cheng, G.D.; Yang, C.S.; Zhao, S.P.; Zhu, Y.L. Evaluation Method for Thaw-Settlement Coefficient of Frozen Soil. J. Glaciol. Geocryol. 2003, 25, 608–613. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, F.X.; Zhang, X.F.; Leng, Y.F.; Zhao, Y.M. Empirical determination method for volumetric compression coefficient of frozen soil during thawing. Rock Soil Mech. 2011, 32, 3432–3436. [Google Scholar]

















| Soil Sample Category | Sampling Depth Range (m) | Gravimetric Water Content Range (%) | Dry Density Range (g·cm−3) | Saturation Range (%) | Number of Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0.5–8 | 41.28–154.87 | 0.68–2.02 | 10.1–100 | 75 |
| Silt | 1–7 | 10.1–112.7 | 0.63–1.95 | 47.7–100 | 18 |
| Sandysoil | 0–8 | 3.7–87 | 0.88–2.24 | 24.3–100 | 51 |
| Fully weathered rock types | 0–7 | 3.8–62.5 | 1.27–2.28 | 18.6–100 | 22 |
| Gravelly soil | 1–7 | 9.7–68.7 | 1.13–1.83 | 49.7–100 | 41 |
| Factor | Description |
|---|---|
| Soil type | Clay, silt, sandy soil, fully weathered rock types, gravelly soil |
| Load (kPa) | 50 → 100 → 200 → 400 → 600 |
| Dry density (g·cm−3) | 0.68–2.28 |
| Gravimetric water content (%) | 3.7–154.87 |
| Parameter Name | SVM | RF | KNN | LR | XGBoost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regularisation coefficient C | [0.1, 100] → 10 | — | — | [0.01, 100] → 1 | — |
| Kernel width γ | [0.0001, 1] → 0.1 | — | — | — | — |
| Insensitivity loss ε | [0.001, 0.5] → 0.1 | — | — | — | — |
| Number of neighbours k | — | — | [3, 25] → 7 | — | — |
| Number of decision trees | — | [100, 800] → 400 | — | — | [200, 1200] → 600 |
| Maximum tree depth | — | [3, 30] → 15 | — | — | [3, 12] → 6 |
| Minimum number of samples for a split | — | [2, 20] → 5 | — | — | — |
| Minimum number of leaf node samples | — | [1, 10] → 2 | — | — | — |
| Maximum feature sampling ratio | — | 0.3–1.0 → 0.7 | — | — | — |
| Learning rate | — | — | — | — | [0.01, 0.3] → 0.1 |
| Sampling ratio | — | — | — | — | [0.6, 1.0] → 0.8 |
| Feature sampling ratio | — | — | — | — | [0.6, 1.0] → 0.8 |
| Minimum leaf node weight | — | — | — | — | [1, 10] → 3 |
| Split minimum loss | — | — | — | — | [0, 5] → 1 |
| L1 regularisation coefficient | — | — | — | [0, 1] → 0.5 | [0, 5] → 1 |
| L2 regularisation coefficient | — | — | — | [0.0001, 10] → 1 | [0.0001, 10] → 1 |
| Load/Kpa | Compressive Strain/% |
|---|---|
| 50 | 5.80 |
| 100 | 8.63 |
| 200 | 11.43 |
| 400 | 14.05 |
| 600 | 16.40 |
| Model | R2 (Melting/Settlement)/R2 (Compression) | RMSE (Melt-Settlement)/RMSE (Compression) | MAE (Melting and Sedimentation)/MAE (Compression) | MAPE (Fusion-Sedimentation)/MAPE (Compression) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BO-XGB | 0.82/0.95 | 4.23/2.93 | 2.68/2.13 | 248.53/22.85 |
| XGB | 0.79/0.94 | 4.46/3.13 | 2.68/2.11 | 269.32/21.91 |
| BO-SVM | 0.85/0.75 | 3.75/6.40 | 2.30/4.13 | 135.40/40.03 |
| SVM | 0.39/0.60 | 7.69/8.08 | 3.67/4.95 | 260.38/50.92 |
| BO-KNN | 0.82/0.78 | 4.19/5.98 | 2.60/4.26 | 185.03/45.06 |
| KNN | 0.79/0.72 | 4.53/6.74 | 2.55/4.90 | 204.80/52.28 |
| BO-LR | 0.80/0.71 | 4.36/6.88 | 3.24/5.10 | 355.93/69.23 |
| LR | 0.79/0.71 | 4.45/6.88 | 3.45/5.10 | 380.11/69.23 |
| BO-RF | 0.80/0.90 | 4.39/4.13 | 2.57/2.95 | 163.19/33.40 |
| RF | 0.79/0.89 | 4.46/4.20 | 2.82/2.92 | 351.18/33.43 |
| Model | R2 | RMSE | MAE |
|---|---|---|---|
| He Model | 0.74 | 5.95 | 4.41 |
| BO-SVM model | 0.84 | 3.75 | 2.69 |
| Model | R2 (100/200 kPa) | RMSE (100/200 kPa) | MAE (100/200 kPa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yang Model | 0.573/0.563 | 5.87/4.71 | 5.01/4.33 |
| BO-XGBoost model | 0.807/0.789 | 4.285/3.62 | 3.556/2.54 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cui, F.; Long, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Yang, Z. Patterns and Prediction of Thaw Settlement and Thaw Compression in Permafrost. GeoHazards 2026, 7, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020060
Liu Z, Wang Z, Cui F, Long X, Wang L, Liu T, Yang Z. Patterns and Prediction of Thaw Settlement and Thaw Compression in Permafrost. GeoHazards. 2026; 7(2):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020060
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Zhiyun, Ziyang Wang, Fuqing Cui, Xiang Long, Li Wang, Te Liu, and Zhou Yang. 2026. "Patterns and Prediction of Thaw Settlement and Thaw Compression in Permafrost" GeoHazards 7, no. 2: 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020060
APA StyleLiu, Z., Wang, Z., Cui, F., Long, X., Wang, L., Liu, T., & Yang, Z. (2026). Patterns and Prediction of Thaw Settlement and Thaw Compression in Permafrost. GeoHazards, 7(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020060

