Are Smart Innovation Ecosystems Really Seeking to Meet Citizens’ Needs? Insights from the Stakeholders’ Vision on Smart City Strategy Implementation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. State of the Art
2.1. Definition
2.2. Smart City Practices and Existing Framework Standards
2.3. Open Innovation and Smart Cities
2.4. Major Drivers of Smart City Innovation
- (i)
- Economic, social, and privacy implications;
- (ii)
- Developing e-government;
- (iii)
- Intelligent transport systems (ITS);
- (iv)
- Health and well-being;
- (v)
- The digital built environment.
2.4.1. The Transport Perspective
2.4.2. The Environmental Sustainability Perspective
2.4.3. The Healthcare Perspective
2.4.4. The Economic Perspective
2.4.5. The E-Governance Perspective
3. Methods
3.1. Research Context and Case Study Selection
3.2. Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Smart Infrastructure
4.2. Smart Institution
4.3. Smart People
5. Key Findings and Analysis
5.1. The Case of Boston
5.1.1. Smart Infrastructure
5.1.2. Smart Institution
5.1.3. Smart People
5.2. The Case of Manchester
5.2.1. Smart Infrastructure
5.2.2. Smart Institution
5.2.3. Smart People
5.3. The Case of San Diego
5.3.1. Smart Infrastructure
5.3.2. Smart Institution
5.3.3. Smart People
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions and Future Research Direction
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Arup, Smart Solution for Cities. 2011. Available online: www.barangoo.com (accessed on 1 August 2015).
- Buscher, V.; Doody, L. Global Innovators: International Case Studies on Smart Cities. 2013. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249397/bis-13-1216-global-innovators-international-smart-cities.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2019).
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference, College Park, MD, USA, 12–15 June 2011; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2011. digital government innovation in challenging times. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.H.; Hancock, M.G.; Hu, M.-C. Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 80–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojo, A.; Curry, E.; Zeleti, F.A. A tale of open data innovations in five smart cities. in System Sciences (HICSS). In Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Agbali, M.; Trillo, C.; Fernando, T.P.; Arayici, Y. Creating Smart and Healthy Cities by Exploring the Potentials of Emerging Technologies and Social Innovation for Urban Efficiency: Lessons from the Innovative City of Boston. 2017. Available online: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/49898/1/Smart%20and%20Healthy%20City%20Case%20Study%20Boston.pdf (accessed on 27 March 2019).
- Abdoullaev, A. Keynote: A smart world: A development model for intelligent cities. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT), Pafos, Cyprus, 31 August–2 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Paskaleva, K.A. The smart city: A nexus for open innovation? Intell. Build. Int. 2011, 3, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbali, M.; Arayici, Y.; Trillo, C. Taking the advancement of sustainable smart cities seriously: The implication of emerging technologies. Tamap J. Eng. 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yusuf_Arayici/publication/316277786_Taking_the_Advancement_of_Sustainable_Smart_Cities_SCs_Seriously_The_Implications_of_Emerging_Technologies/links/5922fda9458515e3d408dd50/Taking-the-Advancement-of-Sustainable-Smart-Cities-SCs-Seriously-The-Implications-of-Emerging-Technologies.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2018).
- Harrison, C.; Donnelly, I.A. A theory of smart cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, UK, 17–22 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Mosannenzadeh, F.; Vettorato, D. Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. Tema. J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nam, T.; Pardo, T.A. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Tallinn, Estonia, 26–29 September 2011; ACM: New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Anthopoulos, L. Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 2017, 63, 128–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameri, R.P. Comparing smart and digital city: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are they digital and/or smart? In Smart City; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 45–88. [Google Scholar]
- Bakıcı, T.; Almirall, E.; Wareham, J. A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.S. Making smart cities work in the face of conflicts: lessons from practitioners of South Korea’s U-City projects. Town Plan. Rev. 2015, 86, 561–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbali, M.; Trillo, C.; Fernando, T. Towards a novel framework of key performance indicators for measuring the impacts of Smart Cities in emerging economies. In Proceedings of the 13th International Postgraduate Research Conference, Salford, UK, 14–15 September 2017. University of Salford. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, S.J.; Rosenberg, N. An overview of innovation. In Studies On Science And The Innovation Process: Selected Works of Nathan Rosenberg; World Scientific: Singapore, 2010; pp. 173–203. [Google Scholar]
- Chesbrough, H. Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Open Innov. Res. New Paradig. 2006, 400, 0–19. [Google Scholar]
- Laursen, K.; Salter, A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 2006, 27, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanbari, A.; Laya, A.; Alonso-Zarate, J.; Markendahl, J. Business development in the internet of things: a matter of vertical cooperation. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- City of Boston. Go Boston 2030. 2015. Available online: https://www.boston.gov/departments/transportation/go-boston-2030 (accessed on 25 April 2018).
- Chourabi, H.; Nam, T.; Walker, S.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Mellouli, S.; Nahon, K.; Pardo, T.A.; Scholl, H.J. Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Azevedo Guedes, A.; Carvalho Alvarenga, J.; dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart, M.; Rodriguez y Rodriguez, M.; Pereira Soares, C. Smart cities: The main drivers for increasing the intelligence of cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coutard, O. Urban space and the development of networks: A discussion of the “splintering urbanism” thesis. In Sustaining Urban Networks; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2004; pp. 64–80. [Google Scholar]
- Kyriazis, D.; Varvarigou, T.; White, D.; Rossi, A.; Cooper, J. Sustainable smart city IoT applications: Heat and electricity management & Eco-conscious cruise control for public transportation. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 14th International Symposium on “A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks“ (WoWMoM), Madrid, Spain, 4–7 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Hodges, T. Public Transportation’s Role in Responding to Climate Change; Diane Publishing: Darby, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Haque, M.; Debnath, A.K.; Chin, H.C. Sustainable, Smart, Safe-a 3‘S’approach Towards a Modern Tranportation System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE)—The State of the Art, Kandy, Sri Lanka, 12–14 December 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 2017, 60, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Farouh, H.; Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance. Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2012, 25, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caragliu, A.; Del Bo, C.; Nijkamp, P. Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelidou, M. Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities 2014, 41, S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, J.; Karvonen, A. ‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’—Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2014, 38, 413–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossi, G.; Pianezzi, D. Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology? Cities 2017, 69, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, D.; Felix, J.R.A.; He, S.; Offenhuber, D.; Ratti, C. CityEye: Real-time visual dashboard for managing urban services and citizen feedback loops. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computing in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM), Cambridge, MA, USA, 7–10 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Phithakkitnukoon, S.; Wolf, M.I.; Offenhuber, D.; Lee, D.; Biderman, A.; Ratti, C. Tracking trash. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2013, 12, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhunia, S.S.; Dhar, S.K.; Mukherjee, N. iHealth: A Fuzzy approach for provisioning Intelligent Health-care system in Smart City. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), Larnaca, Cyprus, 8–10 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, D.; Conti, M.; Solanas, A. A smart health application and its related privacy issues. In Proceedings of the 2016 Smart City Security and Privacy Workshop (SCSP-W), Vienna, Austria, 11 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, N.; Diethe, T.; Camplani, M.; Tao, L.; Burrows, A.; Twomey, N.; Kaleshi, D.; Mirmehdi, M.; Flach, P.; Craddock, I. Bridging e-Health and the Internet of things: The SPHERE project. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2015, 30, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Song, H.; Jara, A.J.; Bie, R. Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giffinger, R.; Pichler-Milanović, N. Smart Cities. Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities; Final Report; Centre of Regional Science: Vienna, Austria, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Washburn, D.; Sindhu, U.; Balaouras, S.; Dines, R.A.; Hayes, N.; Nelson, L.E. Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives. Growth 2009, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Paskaleva, K.A. Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 2009, 1, 405–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Flyvbjerg, B. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual. Inq. 2006, 12, 219–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 62, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CityVerve. Smart City Case Studies. 2018. Available online: http://www.manchester.gov.uk/directory_record/178563/cityverve/category/1160/case_studies (accessed on 20 November 2018).
- URBACT. Building an Effective Entrepreneurship Eco-System. 2017. Available online: http://urbact.eu/building-effective-entrepreneurship-eco-system (accessed on 25 April 2018).
- Allwinkle, S.; Cruickshank, P. Creating smart-er cities: An overview. J. Urban Technol. 2011, 18, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deakin, M.; Al Waer, H. From intelligent to smart cities. Intell. Build. Int. 2011, 3, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICLEI. Chula Vista, CA, Unveils Electric Vehicle Fleet and Charging Stations. 2018. Available online: http://icleiusa.org/chula-vista-electric-vehicle-fleet/ (accessed on 20 November 2018).
- Manchester City Council. Digital Strategy–Project Proposal; Manchester City Council: Manchester, UK, 2018.
S/N | Case | Number of Interviews | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Sector | Private Sector and Industry | Academia | NGO | ||
1 | Boston | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
2 | Manchester | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
3 | San Diego | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 9 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
Domains | Cities | ||
---|---|---|---|
Boston | Manchester | San Diego | |
Smart Infrastructure |
|
|
|
Smart Institution |
|
|
|
Smart People |
|
|
|
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Agbali, M.; Trillo, C.; Ibrahim, I.A.; Arayici, Y.; Fernando, T. Are Smart Innovation Ecosystems Really Seeking to Meet Citizens’ Needs? Insights from the Stakeholders’ Vision on Smart City Strategy Implementation. Smart Cities 2019, 2, 307-327. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2020019
Agbali M, Trillo C, Ibrahim IA, Arayici Y, Fernando T. Are Smart Innovation Ecosystems Really Seeking to Meet Citizens’ Needs? Insights from the Stakeholders’ Vision on Smart City Strategy Implementation. Smart Cities. 2019; 2(2):307-327. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2020019
Chicago/Turabian StyleAgbali, Mohammed, Claudia Trillo, Isa Ali Ibrahim, Yusuf Arayici, and Terrence Fernando. 2019. "Are Smart Innovation Ecosystems Really Seeking to Meet Citizens’ Needs? Insights from the Stakeholders’ Vision on Smart City Strategy Implementation" Smart Cities 2, no. 2: 307-327. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2020019
APA StyleAgbali, M., Trillo, C., Ibrahim, I. A., Arayici, Y., & Fernando, T. (2019). Are Smart Innovation Ecosystems Really Seeking to Meet Citizens’ Needs? Insights from the Stakeholders’ Vision on Smart City Strategy Implementation. Smart Cities, 2(2), 307-327. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2020019