Next Article in Journal
Metal Salt Weighting of Silk: Understanding Practices and Their Historical Context Through Textual Sources
Previous Article in Journal
On the Development of the Hellenic Digital Library of Arabic Historical Sources: A Framework for Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Vibe of Wildness and Death: A Multidisciplinary Study of the Arena Wall Decoration of the Amphitheater in Viminacium (Kostolac, Serbia)

by
Dragana Gavrilović
1,
Ivan Bogdanović
1,
Velibor Andrić
2 and
Maja Gajić-Kvaščev
2,*
1
Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Centre for Archaeometry VINARH, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, POB 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2025, 8(8), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080331
Submission received: 16 July 2025 / Revised: 7 August 2025 / Accepted: 10 August 2025 / Published: 14 August 2025

Abstract

This paper focuses on the study of the arena wall decoration in the amphitheater at the archaeological site of Viminacium. The architectural characteristics of the amphitheater, along with the spectacle iconography, have made this finding one of the most interesting discoveries at Viminacium, as well as in a wider context. A multidisciplinary approach that included an iconographic and archaeological study, as well as Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD), and Raman and Fourier-transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis, was applied to determine the palette of the pigments used for the arena wall decoration and understand the iconography and its context in more detail. Among the commonly used earth pigments (yellow, red, brown, and green colors), copper-based pigments (green and blue Egyptian blue), and the most precious ones for the period—namely, cinnabar and lapis lazuli—were identified. The applied analytical techniques enabled a tentative suggestion of the origin of the raw materials of some of the pigments that were used, such as marine sediments or rocks from different destinations. Due to the fact that the Viminacium amphitheater constitutes a typical example of a provincial building reserved for public spectacles, the results of this study will significantly contribute to our understanding of the function of the amphitheaters in the Danubian region, as well as throughout the Roman world.

1. Introduction

Amphitheaters represent an essential symbol of Roman civilization. The earliest amphitheaters were built in southern Italy, and, as Rome expanded, they continued to be built in various areas, mostly in urban centers and near military forts [1,2,3]. Besides gladiatorial fights (munera gladiatorum), various shows with wild animals (venationes), which featured animal slayings, as well as executions of convicts (damnatio ad bestias), were held in them. The remains of amphitheaters are comparatively rare in Danubian provinces [4], and the amphitheater of Viminacium is the only securely attested within the territory of modern-day Serbia (today, a wider area of Selo Kostolac) [5]. The amphitheater of Viminacium stood out from other similar buildings by its painted decoration of the arena wall, which is unique in Roman art and bears direct symbolism of triumph in hunting or in combat with animals [6,7]. It consisted of two zones. The lower zone was decorated with a simplified imitation of marble paneling, while the upper zone consisted of bordures with depictions of stretched hides of large felines. When we think about this iconographic approach, it inevitably invokes images of fighters in the arena locked in brutal combat with lions, tigers, and leopards, while the audience watched the spectacle with alternating feelings of suspense, excitement, and astonishment.
Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD), and Raman and Fourier-transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analytical techniques were applied in this study to determine the palette of pigments used during the painting of the arena wall.

2. Archaeological Context

Viminacium is located in eastern Serbia, near the confluence of the rivers Mlava and Danube (Figure 1). This place was originally the location of a legionary fortress, where Legio VII Claudia was stationed from the second half of the 1st century onward. Viminacium developed as the capital of the province of Upper Moesia, next to the military fort. As a military, civil, economic, and cultural hub, Viminacium represents one of the most important ancient sites in modern-day Serbia. It is known for its wall paintings, which are primarily found in its late antique tombs [8,9,10], as well as in other buildings [6,11]. One of its most representative examples is the wall decoration of the amphitheater.
Systematic excavations of the amphitheater were undertaken between 2007 and 2017 (Figure 2 and Figure 3). In the initial phase of its construction, the amphitheater was made of wood and constructed next to the legionary fortress at the beginning of the 2nd century. During the first half of the 2nd century, this structure was replaced by one made of both wood and stone. This structure became a part of the city’s area by the end of the 2nd century and the beginning of the 3rd century, as the city expanded into its northeastern corner. The amphitheater was used until the first half of the 4th century. The building was abandoned at that time, and by the end of the 4th century, a necropolis was formed above its remains [5,7,12].
During the archaeological excavations in 2009, 2011, and 2013, collapsed fragments of wall paintings were discovered in the south and southwestern part of the amphitheater (sq. D/7, E/7–8, and F-G/8) next to the arena wall (Figure 4) [12,13,14]. Fragments of wall paintings were also discovered in 2011 in the northwestern part of the arena (sq. E/4), within a late Roman pit. The arena wall itself contained a couple of fragments of wall decoration, which indicates that these fragments belonged to the lower part of the painted unit, that is, the part that was leaning against the very level of the arena.
The arena wall was erected during the second phase of the amphitheater’s construction (Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6). This phase is dated to the period from the first half of the 2nd to the first half of the 4th century [5,12]. It includes different stages that involved various modifications on wooden construction and minor adaptations on the walls, although the basis of the amphitheater and its overall dimensions remained unchanged. The arena wall represented a barrier between the participants and the spectators, functioning as a barrier between the audience and the arena stage. Its average height was 2.63 m [1]. Based on its construction techniques, two distinct phases of construction of the Viminacium amphitheater arena wall can be clearly distinguished (Figure 5).
Initially, the wall was built using the opus quadratum technique. It was made of limestone blocks bound with mortar and was preserved up to a height of 2.4 m. During the second phase, it was reconstructed in the opus incertum technique, using crushed shale and mortar, and its height was increased. Within the arena wall, on the longer axis of the building, there are monumental entrances into the amphitheater (porta sanavivaria and porta libitinensis). Besides these, five service doors (porta postica) were discovered, while it is assumed that there were two more passages that connected the arena to the smaller rooms behind the wall and below the stands. The analysis of the architectural elements indicates that the arena wall was as tall as 3.40 m above the arena in the final phase of its use (Figure 6) [5,12].
The height of the wall was determined according to the specific activities in the arena. In her PhD thesis, S. Vuković [15] argues that the provincial amphitheaters mostly used local animals. During the excavations of Viminacium, remains of a wild boar and brown bear were discovered [7,15,16]. However, the discovery of skeletal remains of a leopard in the wider area of the amphitheater [7] indicates that large felines also participated in the shows organized in the Viminacium arena. The presence of a brown bear and exotic animals in these spectacles certainly justifies the height of the wall of the podium in the Viminacium arena. The length of a bear could be up to 2.8 m and 1.25–1.5 m; thus, standing on their hind legs, these animals can even be above 3 m tall [17,18]. E. Dyggve concludes that lions can leap up to 2 m [19], while other data indicate that large felines can jump above 4 m in height [20]. On the upper edge of the arena wall, there was a thinner wall or a fence (balteus, pluteus) to increase its height and protect the spectators more efficiently (Figure 6). The height of this barrier ranged from 0.3 to 0.8 m; in certain amphitheaters, it was as high as 1–1.2 m [21,22,23]. The protection of the audience could have been enhanced by the addition of other elements, which were not defined in Viminacium, such as protective nets (cancelli) fixed to the top of the wall, but also additional fences, fitted in front of the arena wall itself [1]. The area intended for combat was often limited to the central part of the arena, so as to avoid a blind spot caused by the height of the arena wall [1] and to enable the audience to watch the games without hindrance.
Wall decoration was identified in smaller areas in situ, with no traces of corrections to the painting. Collapsed parts of the decoration were found right next to the arena wall, covered by an archaeological layer dated to the period between the middle and the end of the 4th century, the period when the amphitheater fell out of use. The arrangement of the fragments was irregular, with layers of fragments found overlapping, facing up or down, or positioned diagonally. Together with the findings of fragments of pictorial decoration in the pits from the mid-4th century, these data indicate that the decoration of the arena wall in question belonged to the final stages of the construction of the building. They are dated between the middle of the 2nd century and the first half of the 4th century, when, in all likelihood, the final adaptations of the wall in the southwestern part of the building were carried out (Figure 5).

3. Decoration of the Arena Wall

The iconographic representation on the arena wall is authentic. It consists of two zones: an upper and a lower one. The field separating the two zones is a black line, 2 to 3 cm wide, while above it, there is a painted red bordure, approximately 10 cm wide. According to the undertaken conservation and restoration works and the study of the wall decoration, it was determined that there were originally two zones of wall painting: an upper and a lower one. Unfortunately, the data about how this composition ended in the upper part is missing, so it remains unknown whether there was any painting above the upper zone or whether it simply ended with the bordure. In the fragments of the lower zone, whose height was probably about 1.5 m, lasure areas of red, green, and ochre were visible (Figure 7A). Afterward, it was deduced that it was a very simplified example of marble imitation. In the upper zone, three motive schemes in the form of a frame with decoration were defined. The first pattern was a black interweaving on an orange-red background (Figure 7B). The second pattern consisted of a repetitive motif in black-brown, resembling a U-shape design (Figure 7C1,C2). This motif was rendered on a background consisting of segments of various color blends: olive green, gray, and purple. Since 2018, when it was first examined, the iconographic imagery consisted only of these two patterns (Figure 8) [10]; another unit was conserved, and the third pattern was defined (Figure 7D1,D2 and Figure 9). It was rendered on an ochre background with hues of brown in the middle of a composition. These three patterns represent three distinct fields, separated with bordures: a red bordure flanked by yellow bands, each of them outlined with a white line. The analysis of the painted decoration determined that there were three alternating patterns on the arena wall of the amphitheater in Viminacium. They depicted stretched hides of a leopard, a tiger, and a lion (Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10), and the approximate dimensions of the painted fields were about 1.5 × 1.5 m, but it is worth considering that not all the frames had identical dimensions.
The leopard’s “fur” was recognized first (second scheme), since the same motif is depicted on the cloaks of the participants in Dionysus’ procession on the mosaic “Triumph of Bacchus” from Sousse, Tunisia (central part, the scene framed with vines), where Bacchus himself is wearing a leopard skin dress, while a leopard drinking water from a kantharos is in the foreground (Figure 11) [24]. The same mosaic shows harnessed tigers with a motif very similar to the one from our first scheme. The mosaic from Sousse completely dispelled any doubts that there might have been any other motifs on the arched wall of the Viminacium amphitheater. The fur motif resembling our second scheme, only in a different color palette, can be seen on the feline from the wall painting in Villa of Poppaea (area 13) in Naples [25], while similarly painted fur can be seen on a fresco depicting a leopard from Villa of Cicero in Pompeii (now in Naples Archaeological Museum, Inv. Nu. s. n. Ant. Inv. 72).
Animals were painted in various Roman buildings, but depictions of stretched animal hides are extremely rare. On the peristyle of a villa from Yvonand (Switzerland) from the 2nd century, there are painted animal skins with representations of venators (Figure 12) [26]. There are more examples besides those from Yvonand and Viminacium; for example, the one from Komárom-Szőny (Brigetio), dated to the 3rd century, shows a depiction of stretched animal hides. In it, lion and panther hides can be recognized (Figure 13) [27]. In addition to this, an example from Villa of Els Munts (Altafulla, Tarragona) needs to be mentioned [28,29,30].
Bizarre as it may seem, the imitation of stretched hides represented triumph or a trophy, which is completely understandable in the context of a spectacle in an amphitheater. It should also be taken into account that these wild cats were brought to Viminacium from remote parts of the Empire; thus, such a decoration conveyed an exceptionally exotic trait [10].
The very function of the arena wall required it to be painted in simple motifs, especially in the lower zone of the wall. In some cases, the entire wall was covered in marble paneling, which, among other things, made it difficult for the animals to climb up [1,3]. The painted decoration required painting the wall in one color, most often red. A similar simple decoration of the arena wall was discovered in the military amphitheater in Chester (Deva Victrix) [31], as well as in the civilian amphitheaters in Petronell (Carnuntum), Budapest (Aquincum), and Solin (Salona), but also in other buildings across the state [1]. The examples that depict the very scenes from the arena are rare. In the Pompeian amphitheater, the painted decoration included depictions of gladiators and scenes with animals, that is, hunting and animal combat [32]. Segments of a painting portraying animal combat and hunting scenes were discovered in the amphitheater in Mérida (Augusta Emerita) [33,34]. The scenes of hunting were also depicted on arena walls of buildings in Larache (Lixus) [1,35] and Corinth (Colonia Corinthiensis) [1], but also on the wall of the podium of Herod’s Circus in Caesarea (Caesarea Maritima) [20,36], which was a multifunctional building and was adjusted to this type of spectacle. Just like in the lower zone of the amphitheater in Viminacium, the painted decoration of the arena wall could have imitated architectural elements. On the fresco from Pompeii, which shows an amphitheater and a fight between the residents of Pompeii and Nocera, it was noted that the arena wall was decorated in such a way as to mimic marble plates [32]. In the semi-amphitheater in Augst (Augusta Raurica), the lower zone of the arena wall comprised decorative fields, with depictions of polychrome marble, while above them, there were floral motifs on a white background [22,37,38]. The arena wall of the amphitheater in Augusta Raurica had polychrome decoration, which represented an imitation of marble plates [22,38]. It was established that the painted decoration in Cirencester (Corinium Dobunnorum) imitated the appearance of marble [39].

4. Materials and Methods

Fresco fragments were removed from the site during several conservation campaigns from 2010 to 2013. To identify the pigment palette, six fragments of wall decorations were chosen for analytical examination. As the art scheme repeats itself, it was not necessary to obtain a large number of samples. Samples of a thicker layer of a particular color with sufficiently large areas of clear nuance were chosen. The selected fragments are listed in Table 1.
Some of the pigments can be identified according to their elemental composition. For this purpose, the non-invasive, non-destructive, well-established, and commonly used pEDXRF spectrometry method was applied. The measurements were performed using a pEDXRF spectrometer, constructed at the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences in Belgrade, consisting of an air-cooled X-ray tube with a pin-hole collimator (Oxford Instruments, Rh-anode, maximum 50 kV, 1 mA). A SiPIN X-ray detector (6 mm2/500 μm, Be window with 0.5 mil/12.5 μm thickness and a 1.5-inch detector extension) along with a DSP (X123, Amptek Inc.) for spectra acquisition was also integrated into the instrument. The precise positioning and visualization of the measurement spot were ensured by two laser pointers. The following experimental parameters were maintained the same during all measurements: no filter, 40 kV high voltage, 800 μA current, 100 s measuring time, distances between the sample and the X-ray tube, and the sample and the detector of 21 mm and 22 mm, respectively. The spectra acquisition and elemental identification were conducted using ADMCA software (Amptek Inc., version 1, 0, 0, 16).
For more precise pigment identification, additional XRD analysis was conducted. The samples were analyzed on an automatic powder diffractometer Rigaku SmartLab under the following conditions: copper anticathode radiation with a wavelength of CuKα = 1.54178 Å, operating tube voltage U = 40 kV, and current I = 30 mA. The samples were analyzed in the range of 3–75° 2θ with a step of 0.01° and a data collection rate of 5.0°/min. Based on the obtained I/Imax values and inter-planar spacings d, by comparing them with the literature data and ICDD PDF-2 (2016) standards, the present crystalline phases (minerals) were identified.
Since the identification of black and greyish blue pigments was not possible using the above-mentioned analytical techniques, the KV/E8 and F4 fragments were analyzed by applying Raman spectroscopy (Gem Raman System TO-GRS-532/TO-GRS-532-E—Thunder Optics). The FTIR spectra at the specified position on fragment F4 were obtained using a Bruker Optics ALPHA-R portable spectrophotometer (Bruker Optik GmbH in Ettlingen, Germany). The measurements were conducted at room temperature utilizing an external reflection module with optics (22°/22°), with a spot size of approximately 4 mm in diameter. The analysis covered a range from 400 to 4000 cm−1, averaging 64 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1.

5. Results and Discussion

Red areas were analyzed by EDXRF spectrometry on the fragments F1 (three different spots), KV/E8 (one spot), and KV/E7-E8 (one spot). The comparative EDXRF spectra of three different spots analyzed along the red area on fragment F1 are presented in Figure 14a. It was determined that cinnabar was used as a coloring pigment, together with some earth pigments. Cinnabar was used uniformly along the fragment area, while an iron-based pigment (most probably red earth and/or umber) was added to reach the desired shade or to reduce the usage of precious cinnabar. The red areas were analyzed as two more fragments (KV/E8 and KV/E7-E8). According to the EDXRF spectra (Figure 14b), red-colored earth pigments were detected in both fragments. Additional XRD and Raman spectrometry analysis confirmed the usage of a hematite-based red earth pigment (Figure 15a).
The three different dark red to brownish colored spots were analyzed on fragment F2 by EDXRF spectrometry. A more or less homogenously spread pigment was identified as an earth pigment with the highest content of manganese among all analyzed samples (Figure 14c). According to the XRD analysis, which identified pyrolusite and illite minerals (Figure 15b), the pigment in question may be clay-rich umber [40,41].
Yellow areas were present on two fragments: F1 and KV/E7-E8. Using EDXRF spectrometry, the usage of an earth pigment was discovered by the identification of iron with impurities of K, Ti, Mn, and Sr (Figure 14d). Additional XRD analysis (Figure 15c) revealed the usage of the yellow ochre pigment, by the presence of the goethite mineral.
The EDXRF analysis of the green areas on two fragments (F3 and KV/E7-E8) indicated the use of the green earth pigment, which was applied singly, without mixing with other pigments (Figure 14e). The mineral composition of the green pigments indicated the use of green earth from two different sources of raw material [42]. On one fragment, the green earth was characterized solely by the presence of glauconite (fragment F3, Figure 15d), indicating sedimentary rocks of marine origin (green sand) [43]. The green pigment composition on fragment KV/E7-E8, besides glauconite, contained celadonite, a mineral also characteristic of green earth, which tentatively indicates the use of a raw material originating from Cyprus or Italy (Figure 15e) [42].
The blue pigment was present only on the fragment KV/E7-E8 and was analyzed only by EDXRF spectrometry since the usage of Egyptian blue was confirmed (Figure 14f).
The pigment palette also included chalk white (Figure 14g) and vine black. The vine black pigment was identified by Raman spectrometry (Figure 16a) by comparing the fragment’s spectrum with the database spectra for black pigments. By the XRD analysis, the sodalite mineral was identified in the grayish blue parts of the fragment F4 (Figure 15f).
This result indicated the use of sodalite-group mineral pigments, like lapis lazuli or, most probably, the ultramarine ash pigment (the cheaper version of the blue lapis lazuli pigment). The XRD finding was confirmed by Raman (Figure 16b) and rFTIR spectroscopy (Figure 16c). By identifying the characteristic of a weak band at 583–587 cm−1, which correspond to antisymmetric stretching vibrations of the S3 radical anion, the ν3 mode, and a lower intensity of the band at 1139 cm−1 (associated to S−O stretching vibrations), together with a narrow and weak band at 2340–2342 cm−1 (due to antisymmetric stretching vibrations of CO2 molecules) and 2275 cm−1 (a very weak isotope satellite corresponding to 13C16O2), the use of lapis lazuli was confirmed [44].
The summarized data on the identified pigments are provided in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials.

6. Conclusions

The wall decoration in the Viminacium amphitheater represents a unique case, thus far, when compared to other Roman amphitheaters. In Roman iconography, events from the arena include various depictions, such as gladiatorial combats, hunts, and combat with animals. Depictions of large felines, namely, leopards, tigers, and lions, constitute an integral part of the known iconography, but not a single scene of stretched hides of these animals has been hitherto recorded in Roman wall paintings.
The decoration of the arena wall itself complemented the atmosphere in which the games were held, clearly alluding to the events staged in the amphitheater—particularly the elaborate animal shows. The representations of stretched animal hides, together with the leopard bones found in the wider area of the amphitheater, testify to the fact that, besides local wild fauna, large felines were imported from remote areas for the games in Viminacium. The representations of leopard, lion, and tiger furs on the arena wall symbolize the trophies awarded to the participants who successfully slayed the animals in the arena.
An incredibly rich palette of pigments was used for the wall decoration. Besides the commonly used red, yellow, and green earth pigments, the most commonly used blue pigment, Egyptian blue, was also detected. Vine black and chalk were also identified. Earth pigments were used individually, but the red earth pigment was mixed with cinnabar, most likely to reduce the use of the more precious pigment. The mineralogical analysis revealed the possible origin of the pigments’ raw materials. The so-called green sand pigment was determined by identifying solely glauconite in the green earth pigment. The presence of celadonite in addition to glauconite in the green earth pigment indicates the Cyprus or Italian origin of raw materials for the pigment. The detection of the sodalite mineral was an indication of the usage of a very expensive lapis lazuli pigment. The discovery that pigments from distant regions, together with the precious cinnabar and lapis lazuli pigments, were used for the arena wall decoration was unexpected yet not uncommon, given the discoveries of animal remains from afar. The unique iconographic scheme, together with the pigments and the wild animals brought from distant parts of the Empire, indicates the cosmopolitan character of Viminacium. The use of the amphitheater coincided with a period of prosperity in Viminacium. During this period, a variety of goods, including pigments, were imported from across the Roman world. Simultaneously, a local painting officina was active, which helps explain the incredibly rich palette of pigments used to decorate the arena wall of the Viminacium amphitheater.
The specificity of the decoration itself reflects the importance of the amphitheater for the residents of Viminacium. Holding gladiator fights in the arena was not only entertainment for the crowds, but also a means of promoting the Roman way of life and customs. The Imperial cult was extolled in the amphitheaters, so decorating the arena walls may have been intended to enhance the atmosphere during visits by several Emperors, such as Hadrianus, Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Gordianus III, Diocletianus, and Constantinus, who resided in Viminacium. Wall paintings may have been commissioned to honor other important occasions, such as the proclamation of Viminacium’s elevation to the status of a colony, various public or civic holidays, or celebrations of military triumphs by the Roman army in campaigns involving members of the VII Claudia legion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/heritage8080331/s1, Figure S1. The EDXRF spectra of a) cinnabar mixed with earth pigments (Corresponding to Figure 14a); Figure S2. The EDXRF spectra of b) red-colored earth pigments (Corresponding to Figure 14b); Figure S3. The EDXRF spectra of c) umber pigment (Corresponding to Figure 14c); Figure S4. The EDXRF spectra of d) yellow-colored earth pigments (Corresponding to Figure 14d); Figure S5. The EDXRF spectra of e) green-colored earth pigments (Corresponding to Figure 14e); Figure S6. The EDXRF spectra of f) Egyptian blue (Corresponding to Figure 14f); Figure S7. The EDXRF spectra of g) white pigment (Corresponding to Figure 14g); Figure S8. The Raman spectra of black pigment on the fragment KV/E8, together with database spectra (Corresponding to Figure 16a); Figure S9. The Raman spectra of grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4, together with database spectra (Corresponding to Figure 16b); Figure S10. The rFTIR spectra of grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4 (Markers denote the bends which enabled lapis lazuli pigment identification) (Corresponding to Figure 16c); Table S1. Identified pigments palette, used analytical technique, and tentative raw material origin.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G.-K., D.G. and I.B.; methodology, M.G.-K., D.G. and I.B.; validation, V.A.; formal analysis, M.G.-K.; investigation, D.G. and I.B.; resources, D.G. and I.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.-K., D.G. and I.B.; writing—review and editing, M.G.-K. and V.A.; visualization, D.G. and I.B.; supervision, M.G.-K.; funding acquisition, V.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The conservation and restoration of the arena wall decoration were carried out as part of the project “Conservation and presentation of wall painting from the archaeological site of Amphitheater (Viminacium)”, led by D. Gavrilović. The Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Serbia funded the project during the years 2013–2015 and 2017. This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 451-03-136/2025-03/200017 dated on 04 February 2025-Research Program No. 1-Contract No. 110-10/2019-000, T0602503).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Viminacium archaeological team for their great support. The parts of the decoration of the amphitheater are displayed at the Museum within the Viminacium Archaeological Park. We want to thank Dávid Bartus (Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest) for his kind help and for providing the ideal reconstruction of the wall decoration from Brigetio. We also thank Yves Dubois (University of Lausanne) for providing the reconstruction of the wall decoration from Yvonand. For Raman analysis, the authors acknowledge Gkanetsos Theodoros, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece. This paper is dedicated to the memory of our colleague Predrag Vulić. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Golvin, J.C. L’amphithéâtre Romain: Essai sur la Theorisation de sa Forme et de Ses Fonctions; Diffusion de Boccard: Paris, France, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bomgardner, D.L. The Story of the Roman Amphitheatre, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Welch, K.E. The Roman Amphitheatre: From Its Origins to the Colosseum, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bajusz, I. Amfiteatrul de la Porolissum şi Amfiteatrale din Provinciile Romane de la Dunărea de Mijloc; Societatea Muzeului Ardelean: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikolić, S.; Bogdanović, I. Recent Excavations on the Amphitheatre of Viminacium (Upper Moesia). In Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies, Ruse, Bulgaria, 6–11 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogić, D. Viminacium’s painting officina. In Proceedings of the Pictores per Provincias II–Status Quaestionis–XIII Kolloquium der Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique (AIPMA), Université de Lausanne, Basel, Switzerland, 12–16 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bogdanović, I.; Rogić, D.; Vuković-Bogdanović, S. The amphitheatre of Viminacium. In Roman Limes and Cities in the Territory of Serbia, 1st ed.; Korać, M., Pop-Lazić, S., Eds.; Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts: Belgrade, Serbia, 2018; pp. 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  8. Korać, M. The Paintings in the Late Classical Tombs in Viminacium. In Proceedings of the Symposium The Age of Tetrarchs, The Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia, 4–9 October 1993. [Google Scholar]
  9. Korać, M. The Paintings of Viminacium; Center for New Technologies–Viminacium: Belgrade, Serbia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rogić, D. Painted decoration from a Viminacium tomb. In Vivere Militare est: From Populus to Emperors-Living on the Frontier; Korać, M., Golubović, S., Mrđić, N., Eds.; Institute of Archaeology: Belgrade, Serbia, 2018; Volume II, pp. 163–193. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gavrilović, D.; Milovanović, B. Fragments of Wall Painting Residential Buildings at the Site of Čair (Viminacium). Archaeol. Bulg. XXV 2021, 1, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bogdanović, I. Building a Roman Amphitheatre. Case Study: The Viminacium Amphitheatre. Ph.D Thesis, Univeristy of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rogić, D.; Bogdanović, I. Painted Decoration of the Amhitheatre Arena Wall in Viminacium. In Archaeology in Serbia: Projects of the Archaeological Institute in 2011. Annual of the Institute of Archaeology 2011; Bikić, V., Golubović, S., Antonović, D., Eds.; Institute of Archaeology: Belgrade, Serbia, 2012; pp. 46–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rogić, D. The Technology of the Antique Wall Paintings on the Territory of Serbia. Ph.D Thesis, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade, Serbia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vuković, S.I. Animals in Roman Amphitheatres: Viminacium Amphitheater Case Study. Ph.D Thesis, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade, Serbia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vuković, S.I. Bear in Roman spectacle, Viminacium amphitheater case study. J. Serbian Archaeol. Soc. 2012, 27, 315–338. [Google Scholar]
  17. Brehm, A.E. Animal Life; Prosvjeta: Ljubljana, Slovenia; Zagreb, Croatia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pasitschniak-Arts, M. Ursus actos. Mamalian Species 1993, 439, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dyggve, E. L’amphithéâtre. In Recherches à Salone 2; Weilbach, F., Dyggve, E., Eds.; J.H. Schultz: Copenhague, Denmark, 1933; pp. 33–150. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dodge, H. Circuses in the Roman East: A Reappraisal. In Le Cirque Romain et Son Image. Ausonius; Nelis-Clément, J., Roddaz, J.M., Eds.; Actes du Colloque Tenu à L’institut Ausonius: Bordeaux, France, 2008; pp. 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bateman, N.; Cowan, C.; Wroe-Brown, R. London’s Roman amphitheatre: Guildhall Yard, City of London. In Museum of London Archaeology Service Monograph 35; MoLAS: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hufschmid, T. Amphitheatrum in Provincia et Italia: Architektur und Nutzung Römischer Amphitheater von Augusta Raurica bis Puteoli; Römermuseum Augst: Augst, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Krizmanić, A. Amphitheatre in Pula: Research on its Original Appearance from the Mid-1st Century BC. Prostor 2016, 24, 132–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dunbabin, K.M.D. The Mosaics of Roman North Afica: Studies in Iconography and Patronage; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fergola, L. Oplontis and Its Villas; Archeologia Vesuviana Series: Flavius, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dubois, Y. Venatio et peinture murale romaine à Yvonand-Mordagne (VD). Archéol. Suisse 1996, 19, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  27. Borhy, L. Everyday-life on the Pannonian Limes: Houses and their Inner Decoration in Roman Brigetio (Komárom/Szőny, Hungary). Histria Antiq. 2011, 20, 34–62. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guiral Pelegrin, C. La decoración pintada del “cubículo de las estaciones” de la Villa Romana dels Munts (Altafulla, Tarragona). The painting of the «Seasons cubiculum» of the roman villa of Els Munts (Altafulla, Tarragona). UNED. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma. Ser. I Nueva época. Prehistoria y Arqueología t 2010, 3, 127–144. [Google Scholar]
  29. Guiral, C. La decoración pictórica de la villa romana de Els Munts (Altafulla, Tarragona): La caracterización de una officina pictores, en A. In La Pintura Romana en Hispania. Del estudio de Campo a la Puesta en Valor; Fernández Díaz, G., Alcántara, G., Eds.; Editum: Murcia, Spain, 2020; pp. 5–66. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guiral, C. La Decoración Pintada. In Vil.la Romana dels Munts; Remolà, J.A., Ed.; Tarraco: Tarragona, Spain, 2022; pp. 243–364. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilmott, T.; Garner, D. The Roman Amphitheatre of Chester Volume 1: The Prehistoric and Roman Archaeology; Oxbow: Oxford, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobelli, L. Gladiators at Pompeii. L’Erma di Bretschneider; Roberto Marcucci: Roma, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  33. Álvarez Martínez, J.M.; Nogales Basarrate, T. Las pinturas del anfiteatro romano de Mérida. In Bimilenario del anfiteatro romano de Mérida: Coloquio Internacional El Anfiteatro en la Hispania Romana, Mérida, 26–28 de Noviembre de 1992; Alvarez Martínez, J.M., Enríquez Navascués, J.J., Eds.; Consejería de Cultura: Mérida, Mexico, 1994; pp. 265–284. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hernández Ramírez, J. Las pinturas murales del anfiteatro de Augusta Emerita. In Actas de las IV Jornadas de Humanidades Clásicas; Cabanillas Nuñez, C.M., Calero Carretero, J.A., Eds.; Consejería de Cultura: Almendralejo, Spain, 2006; pp. 13–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pichot, A. Les édifices de Spectacle des Maurétanies Romaines. Ph.D Thesis, University of Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  36. Michaeli, T. The Roman Amphitheater Wall Paintings–The Pictorial Program. In Caesarea Maritima. Vol. 1, Herod’s Circus and Related Buildings. Part 1, Architecture and Stratigraphy, 1st ed.; Porath, Y., Ed.; Israel Antiquities Authority: Jerusalem, Israel, 2013; pp. 183–189. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hufschmid, T.; Horisberger-Matter, I. Ipsius autem theatri conformatio sic est facienda… 16 Jahre Forschung und Restaurierung im römischen Theater von Augst. Jahresber. Augst Kaiseraugst 2008, 29, 161–225. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hufschmid, T. Theatres and Amphitheatres in Augusta Raurica, Augst, Switzerland. In Roman Amphitheatres and Spectacula, a 21st-Century Perspective-Papers from an International Conference held at Chester, UK, 16–18 February 2007; Wilmott, T., Ed.; Archaeopress: Oxford, UK, 2009; pp. 105–117. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wacher, J. Cirencester Roman Amphitheatre; Cambridge University Press: London, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  40. Garofano, I.; Perez-Rodriguez, J.L.; Robador, M.D.; Duran, A. An innovative combination of non-invasive UV–Visible-FORS, XRD and XRF techniques to study Roman wall paintings from Seville, Spain. J. Cult. Herit. 2016, 22, 1028–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nicola, M.; Mastrippolito, C.; Masic, A. Iron Oxide-Based Pigments and Their Use in History. In Iron Oxides: From Nature to Applications; Faivre, D., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2016; pp. 546–566. [Google Scholar]
  42. Piovesan, R.; Maritan, L.; Neguer, J. Characterising the unique polychrome sinopia under the Lod Mosaic, Israel: Pigments and painting technique. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2014, 46, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hradil, D.; Grygar, T.; Hradilova, J.; Bezdička, P. Clay and iron oxide pigments in the history of painting. Appl. Clay Sci. 2003, 22, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chukanov, M.V.; Sapozhnikov, A.N.; Shendrik, R.Y.; Vigasina, M.F.; Steudel, R. Spectroscopic and Crystal-Chemical Features of Sodalite-Group Minerals from Gem Lazurite Deposits. Minerals 2020, 10, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of Viminacium.
Figure 1. Location of Viminacium.
Heritage 08 00331 g001
Figure 2. Location of the Viminacium amphitheater.
Figure 2. Location of the Viminacium amphitheater.
Heritage 08 00331 g002
Figure 3. Plan of the Viminacium amphitheater.
Figure 3. Plan of the Viminacium amphitheater.
Heritage 08 00331 g003
Figure 4. Fragments of the wall painting during the archaeological excavations.
Figure 4. Fragments of the wall painting during the archaeological excavations.
Heritage 08 00331 g004
Figure 5. Segment of the arena wall in the southwest part of the amphitheater.
Figure 5. Segment of the arena wall in the southwest part of the amphitheater.
Heritage 08 00331 g005
Figure 6. Cross-section of the cavea of the stone–wooden amphitheater in Viminacium (made by I. Bogdanović).
Figure 6. Cross-section of the cavea of the stone–wooden amphitheater in Viminacium (made by I. Bogdanović).
Heritage 08 00331 g006
Figure 7. Decoration of the arena wall after the conservation and restoration works: (A) lower zone, (B) the first scheme, (C1,C2) the second scheme, and (D1,D2) the third scheme (photos by G. Stojić).
Figure 7. Decoration of the arena wall after the conservation and restoration works: (A) lower zone, (B) the first scheme, (C1,C2) the second scheme, and (D1,D2) the third scheme (photos by G. Stojić).
Heritage 08 00331 g007
Figure 8. Ideal reconstruction of the first and second schemes (reconstruction painting: D. Gavrilović).
Figure 8. Ideal reconstruction of the first and second schemes (reconstruction painting: D. Gavrilović).
Heritage 08 00331 g008
Figure 9. Ideal reconstruction of the third scheme (reconstruction painting: D. Gavrilović).
Figure 9. Ideal reconstruction of the third scheme (reconstruction painting: D. Gavrilović).
Heritage 08 00331 g009
Figure 10. Ideal reconstruction of the arena wall (made by Dedalus Er and M. Simić; archaeological and architectural research by I. Bogdanović).
Figure 10. Ideal reconstruction of the arena wall (made by Dedalus Er and M. Simić; archaeological and architectural research by I. Bogdanović).
Heritage 08 00331 g010
Figure 11. Triumph of Bacchus from Sousse, Tunisia (https://www.romeartlover.it/Musousse.html, “URL (accessed on 22 April 2024)”).
Figure 11. Triumph of Bacchus from Sousse, Tunisia (https://www.romeartlover.it/Musousse.html, “URL (accessed on 22 April 2024)”).
Heritage 08 00331 g011
Figure 12. Decoration on the peristyle of the villa from Yvonand (Reconstruction painting: M. Wust, N. Deneux).
Figure 12. Decoration on the peristyle of the villa from Yvonand (Reconstruction painting: M. Wust, N. Deneux).
Heritage 08 00331 g012
Figure 13. Decoration from Brigetio (Photos and reconstruction drawing: E. Számadó, E. Harsányi, Z. Kurovszki from Komáromi Klapka György Múzeum).
Figure 13. Decoration from Brigetio (Photos and reconstruction drawing: E. Számadó, E. Harsányi, Z. Kurovszki from Komáromi Klapka György Múzeum).
Heritage 08 00331 g013
Figure 14. The EDXRF spectra of (a) cinnabar mixed with earth pigments, (b) red-colored earth pigments, (c) umber pigment, (d) yellow-colored earth pigments, (e) green-colored earth pigments, (f) Egyptian blue, and (g) white pigment. Only the elements of interest for the pigment identification are denoted. NOTE: Enlarged and detailed EDXRF spectra are presented in the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 14. The EDXRF spectra of (a) cinnabar mixed with earth pigments, (b) red-colored earth pigments, (c) umber pigment, (d) yellow-colored earth pigments, (e) green-colored earth pigments, (f) Egyptian blue, and (g) white pigment. Only the elements of interest for the pigment identification are denoted. NOTE: Enlarged and detailed EDXRF spectra are presented in the Supplementary Materials.
Heritage 08 00331 g014
Figure 15. The XRD spectra of (a) hematite-based red earth pigment, (b) umber pigment, (c) goethite-based yellow ochre pigment, (d) green earth pigment (green sand), (e) green earth pigment (Cyprus or Italy origin), and (f) sodalite mineral in the composition of lapis lazuli.
Figure 15. The XRD spectra of (a) hematite-based red earth pigment, (b) umber pigment, (c) goethite-based yellow ochre pigment, (d) green earth pigment (green sand), (e) green earth pigment (Cyprus or Italy origin), and (f) sodalite mineral in the composition of lapis lazuli.
Heritage 08 00331 g015
Figure 16. (a) The Raman spectra of the black pigment on the fragment KV/E8. (b) The Raman spectra of the grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4. (c) The rFTIR spectra of the grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4 (markers denote the bends that enabled pigment identification). NOTE: Enlarged and detailed spectra are presented in the Supplementary Material.
Figure 16. (a) The Raman spectra of the black pigment on the fragment KV/E8. (b) The Raman spectra of the grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4. (c) The rFTIR spectra of the grayish blue pigment on the fragment F4 (markers denote the bends that enabled pigment identification). NOTE: Enlarged and detailed spectra are presented in the Supplementary Material.
Heritage 08 00331 g016
Table 1. Arena wall decoration fragments used in this study.
Table 1. Arena wall decoration fragments used in this study.
IDFragment PhotoXRFXRDRamanrFTIR
F1Heritage 08 00331 i0013 redxxx
3 ochres1 ochrexx
1 whitexxx
F2Heritage 08 00331 i0023 dark red1 dark redxx
F3Heritage 08 00331 i0031 green1 greenxx
F4Heritage 08 00331 i004x1 grayish blue1 grayish blue1 grayish blue
KV/E8Heritage 08 00331 i0051 red1 redxx
1 blackx1 blackx
KV/E7-E8Heritage 08 00331 i0061 red1 redxx
1 yellow1 yellowxx
1 green1 greenxx
1 bluexxx
1 whitexxx
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gavrilović, D.; Bogdanović, I.; Andrić, V.; Gajić-Kvaščev, M. Vibe of Wildness and Death: A Multidisciplinary Study of the Arena Wall Decoration of the Amphitheater in Viminacium (Kostolac, Serbia). Heritage 2025, 8, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080331

AMA Style

Gavrilović D, Bogdanović I, Andrić V, Gajić-Kvaščev M. Vibe of Wildness and Death: A Multidisciplinary Study of the Arena Wall Decoration of the Amphitheater in Viminacium (Kostolac, Serbia). Heritage. 2025; 8(8):331. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gavrilović, Dragana, Ivan Bogdanović, Velibor Andrić, and Maja Gajić-Kvaščev. 2025. "Vibe of Wildness and Death: A Multidisciplinary Study of the Arena Wall Decoration of the Amphitheater in Viminacium (Kostolac, Serbia)" Heritage 8, no. 8: 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080331

APA Style

Gavrilović, D., Bogdanović, I., Andrić, V., & Gajić-Kvaščev, M. (2025). Vibe of Wildness and Death: A Multidisciplinary Study of the Arena Wall Decoration of the Amphitheater in Viminacium (Kostolac, Serbia). Heritage, 8(8), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080331

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop