Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Attitudes
2.2. Perceived Website Quality (PWQ)
2.3. Perceived Benefits (PB)
2.4. Electronic Word of Mouth
2.5. Trust
3. Research Hypotheses
3.1. Perceived Website Quality and Perceived Benefits
3.2. Perceived Website Quality and Electronic Word of Mouth
3.3. Perceived Website Quality and Trust
3.4. Perceived Website Quality and Consumer Attitudes
3.5. Electronic Word of Mouth and Trust
3.6. Perceived Benefits and Attitudes
3.7. Trust and Attitudes
3.8. Perceived Benefits and Electronic Word of Mouth
3.9. Perceived Benefits and Trust
4. Research Methodology
4.1. Design of the Study
4.2. Measurement Development
4.3. Survey Results
5. Analysis of Results
5.1. Measurement Model
5.1.1. Reliability
5.1.2. Validity
5.2. Structural Model
6. Discussion
Implications
7. Limitations and Future Research
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer
References
- Internet World Stats. Usage and Population Statistics. Internet World Stats. 2019. Available online: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed on 14 August 2018).
- Statistica. Internet Usage in South Korea—Statistics & Facts. Stat. Portal. 2018. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/2230/internet-usage-in-south-korea/ (accessed on 14 August 2018).
- Fang, Y.; Qureshi, I.; Sun, H.; Mccole, P.; Ramsey, E.; Lim, K.H. Trust, satisfaction, and online repurchase intention: The moderating role of perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. MIS Q. 2014, 38, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.-J.; Lee, C.-K.; Chung, N. Investigating the role of trust and gender in online tourism shopping in South Korea. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2013, 37, 377–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuah, A.T.H.; Wang, P. Fast-expanding “online” markets in South Korea and China: Are they worth pursuing? Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2017, 59, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.S.S.; Balaji, M.S.; Khong, K.W. An investigation of online shopping experience on trust and behavioral intentions. J. Internet Commer. 2015, 14, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Debei, M.M.; Akroush, M.N.; Ashouri, M.I. Consumer attitudes towards online shopping: The effects of trust, perceived benefits, and perceived web quality. Internet Res. 2015, 25, 707–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.-H.; Noh, M.-J.; Choi, S.-B. Difference in the adoption of internet open markets between transition and established market economies. Electron. Commer. Res. 2014, 14, 531–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, S.-J.; Stoel, L. Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.W. Daum Kakao Finds New Growth Engine in Digital Wallet Business. The Korea Herald. 2 January 2015. Available online: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20150102000541 (accessed on 1 November 2017).
- Korea top sites. Quality Korean Online Shopping Sites. 2017. Available online: https://www.reddit.com/r/korea/comments/1i1vle/quality_korean_online_shopping_sites/ (accessed on 1 September 2017).
- eMarketer. Top 10 Retail Ecommerce Sites in South Korea, Ranked by Unique Visitors, February 2017. (Millions and% Reach). Emarketer. 2019. Available online: https://www.emarketer.com/Chart/Top-10-Retail-Ecommerce-Sites-South-Korea-Ranked-by-Unique-Visitors-Feb-2017-millions-reach/206047 (accessed on 5 August 2019).
- Ghamdi, R.A.; Alfarraj, O.A.; Bahaddad, A.A. How retailers at different stages of e-commerce maturity evaluate their entry to e-commerce activities? J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2014, 2, 37–71. [Google Scholar]
- Antonides, G. Sustainable consumer behaviour: A collection of empirical studies. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tse, T.; Esposito, M.; Soufani, K. Fast-Expanding Markets: Where New Growth can be found! The European Business Review. 10 March 2013. Available online: http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/fast-expanding-markets-where-new-growth-can-be-found/ (accessed on 3 November 2017).
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovation; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.-M.; Yoon, S.-H. Separating early-adopters from the majority: The case of broadband internet access in Korea. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 2005, 72, 301–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, E.M. Diffussion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press of Glencoe: New York, NY, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Limbu, Y.B.; Wolf, M.; Lunsford, D. Perceived ethics of online retailers and consumer behavioral intentions. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2012, 6, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akroush, M.N.; Al-Debei, M.M. An integrated model of factors affecting consumer attitudes towards online shopping. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 2015, 21, 1353–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.T.; Chu, R.; Wong, I.A.; Zuniga, M.A.; Meng, Y.; Pang, C. Exploring the relationship among affective loyalty, perceived benefits, attitude, and intention to use co-branded products. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2012, 24, 561–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.-W.; Xu, Y.; Koh, J. A comparison of online trust building factors between potential customers and repeat customers. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2004, 5, 392–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alba, J.; Lynch, J.; Weitz, B.; Janiszewski, C.; Lutz, R.; Sawyer, A.; Wood, S. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Mark. 1997, 61, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Lee, M.K.O.; Rabjohn, N. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth. Internet Res. 2008, 18, 229–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.-E.; Kang, H.-J.; Ahn, H.-J. Word-of-mouth of cultural products through institutional social networks. Sustainability 2017, 9, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.-Y.; Lennon, S.J. Effects of reputation and website quality on online consumers’ emotion, perceived risk and purchase intention. Based on the stimulus-organism-response model. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2013, 7, 33–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, Y.C.; Yeh, J.C. Perceived risk of information security and privacy in online shopping: A study of environmentally sustainable products. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2010, 4, 4057–4066. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, W.Y.; Huang, P.C.; Fu, C.S. The influence of an online auction’s product price and e-retailer reputation on consumers’ perception, attitude, and behavioral intention. Scand. J. Psychol. 2011, 52, 290–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ACCA. ACCA Paper P1: Governance, Risk and Ethics; BPP Learning Media Ltd.: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- O’Cass, A.; Carlson, J. An e-retailing assessment of perceived website-service innovativeness: Implications for website quality evaluations, trust, loyalty and word of mouth. Australas. Mark. J. 2012, 20, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T. Examining the critical success factors of mobile website adoption. Online Inf. Rev. 2011, 35, 636–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Maghrabi, T.; Dennis, C. What drives consumers’ continuance intention to e-shopping? Conceptual framework and managerial implications in the case of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2011, 39, 899–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seckler, M.; Heinz, S.; Forde, S.; Touch, A.N.; Opwis, K. Trust and distrust on the web: User experiences and website characteristics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 45, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.-J. The antecedents and consequences of trust in online-purchase decisions. J. Interact. Mark. 2002, 16, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour. J. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 27–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, Y.W.; Kim, J.; Libaque-Saenz, C.F.; Chang, Y.; Park, M.-C. Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: Facebook and KakaoTalk in Korea. Telemat. Inform. 2015, 32, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, M.-H.; Chuang, L.-W.; Hsu, C.-S. Understanding online shopping intention: The roles of four types of trust and their antecedents. Internet Res. 2014, 24, 332–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, N.-H.; Koo, C.-M.; Lee, K.-M. Assessing the impact of mobile technology on exhibition attendees’ unplanned booth visit behaviour. Sustainability 2017, 9, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naspetti, S.; Mandolesi, S.; Buysse, J.; Latvala, T.; Nicholas, P.; Padel, S.; van Loo, E.J.; Zanoli, R. Determinants of the acceptance of sustainable production strategies among dairy farmers: Development and testing of a modified technology acceptance model. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fishbein, M.; Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research; Addison-Wesley: Amherst, MA, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Stock, R.M.; Hoyer, W.D. An attitude-behavior model of sales people’s customer orientation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2005, 33, 536–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, S.; Todd, P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 1995, 6, 144–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, B. Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 597–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, M.H.; Chang, C.M.; Chuang, L.W. Understanding the determinants of online repeat purchase intention and moderating role of habit: The case of online group-buying in Taiwan. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 2015, 35, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Law, R.; Wen, I. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2008, 27, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsiao, K.; Lin, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, H.-P.; Yu, H. Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations: An empirical study in social shopping. Online Inf. Rev. 2010, 34, 935–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Guinalíu, M. Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. J. Retail Consum. Serv. 2012, 19, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, A.; Nath, P. Role of electronic trust in online retailing: A re-examination of the commitment-trust theory. Eur. J. Mark. 2007, 41, 1173–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 334–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.F. An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2011, 31, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Wang, B.; Wang, N.; Lu, Y. Understanding the evolution of consumer trust in mobile commerce: A longitudinal study. Inf. Technol. Manag. 2014, 15, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.-I. The relationship between consumer characteristics and attitude toward online shopping. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2003, 21, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, J.-U.; Park, S.-C. The effects of perceived value, website trust and hotel trust on online hotel booking intention. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gwinner, K.P.; Walsh, G.; Gremler, D.D. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J. Interact. Mark. 2004, 18, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shankar, V.; Urban, G.L.; Sultan, F. Online trust: A stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2002, 11, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Shen, B. A product line analysis for eco-designed fashion products: Evidence from an outdoor sportswear brand. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yan, X.; Fan, W.; Gordon, M. The joint moderating role of trust propensity and gender on consumers’ online shopping behavior. Comput Hum. Behav. 2015, 43, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.-K.; Gunn, F.; Han, S.-L. Multidimensional trust building in e-retailing: Cross-cultural differences in trust formation and implications for perceived risk. J. Retail Consum. Serv. 2012, 19, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Yuan, D. Helping Chinese Consumers Making the Informed Choices: The Challenge of Trust; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Corritore, C.L.; Kracher, B.; Wiedenbeck, S. On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2003, 58, 737–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faqih, K.M.S. An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter? J. Retail Consum. Serv. 2016, 30, 140–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malaquias, R.F.; Hwang, Y.-J. An empirical study on trust in mobile banking: A developing country perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 54, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, P.A.; Liang, H.; Xue, Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Q. 2007, 31, 105–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKnight, D.H.; Chervany, N.L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int. J. Electron. 2002, 6, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forsythe, S.; Liu, C.; Shannon, D.; Gardner, L.C. Development of a scale to measure the perceived benefits and risks of online shopping. J. Interact. Mark. 2006, 20, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Constantinides, E.; Lorenzo-Romero, C.; Gómez, M.A. Effects of web experience on consumer choice: A multicultural approach. Internet Res. 2010, 20, 188–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, H.-Y. Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2004, 13, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Maghrabi, T.; Dennis, C.; Vaux Halliday, S. Antecedents of continuance intentions towards e-shopping: The case of Saudi Arabia. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2011, 24, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walmart. Walmart Expands Online Sustainable Shopping Offering. Walmart. 2015. Available online: https://corporate.walmart.com/_news_/news-archive/2015/02/24/walmart-expands-online-sustainable-shopping-offering (accessed on 6 November 2017).
- Hausman, A.V.; Siekpe, J.S. The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weijters, B.; Rangarajan, D.; Falk, T.; Schillewaert, N. Determinants and outcomes of customers’ use of self-service technology in a retail setting. J. Serv. Res. 2007, 10, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Wells, W.D. Attitude toward the site. J. Advert. Res. 1999, 39, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D. Managing user trust in B2C e-Services. e-Service J. 2003, 2, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baganzi, R.; Lau, A.K.W. Examining trust and risk in mobile money acceptance in Uganda. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T. An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile payment. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2014, 77, 1519–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zikmund, W.G. Business Research Methods, 7th ed.; Thomson/South-Western: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Nduneseokwu, C.K.; Qu, Y.; Appolloni, A. Factors influencing consumers’ intentions to participate in a formal e-waste collection system: A case study of Onitsha, Nigeria. Sustainability 2017, 9, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Y.; Lee, K.C. Investigating the moderating role of uncertainty avoidance cultural values on multidimensional online trust. Inf. Manag. 2012, 49, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Shim, J.P. Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: An empirical study of mobile banking services. Decis. Support Syst. 2010, 49, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM); SAGE Publications, Inc.: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira, T.; Thomas, M.; Baptista, G.; Campos, F. Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 61, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.; Gerbing, D. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W.; Newsted, P.R. Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 2009, 20, 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Wei, J.; Yu, C.-S.; Liu, C. How do post-usage factors and espoused cultural values impact mobile payment continuation? Behav. Inf. Technol. 2016, 36, 140–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research; Marcoulides, G.A., Ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Duane, A.; O’Reilly, P.; Andreev, P. Realising M-Payments: Modelling consumers’ willingness to M-pay using smartphones. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2014, 33, 318–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y.-J. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. 1981, 1, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gefen, D.; Straub, D.W.; Boudreau, M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research and practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2000, 4, 1–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.-Y.; Sung, C.-S.; Im, I. Does social media use influence entrepreneurial opportunity? A review of its moderating role. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, D.T.; Fiske, D.W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 1959, 56, 81–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Debei, M.M. The quality and acceptance of websites: An empirical investigation in the context of higher education. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2013, 12, 170–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Construct | Item | Survey Statement | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Perceived Website Quality (PWQ) | PWQ1 | Gmarket website internal browsing meets my needs | [7,51,68] |
PWQ2 | The ordering process used by Gmarket website is simple | ||
PWQ3 | Gmarket website web page content quickly loads | ||
PWQ4 | The Gmarket website internal search capabilities meets my needs | ||
PWQ5 | Little search effort is needed to find the needed products/information on the Gmarket retailer website | ||
PWQ6 | Overall, the Gmarket website is well-designed | ||
Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) | eWOM1 | I often read online recommendations to buy products from Gmarket retailers | [7,69] |
eWOM2 | I often post positive online comments about Gmarket retailers | ||
eWOM3 | I often read positive online reviews about the products of Gmarket retailers | ||
eWOM4 | My e-community frequently post online recommendations to buy from Gmarket retailers | ||
eWOM5 | When I buy a product from Gmarket retailers, consumers’ online recommendations and reviews make me more confident in purchasing the product | ||
Perceived Benefits (PB) | PB1 | By using Gmarket retailers, I can shop in privacy of home | [7,67]; self-developed |
PB2 | I can buy from Gmarket retailers whenever I want | ||
PB3 | Buying from Gmarket retailers can save me the effort of buying what I want from offline/traditional stores | ||
PB4 | I find prices cheaper on Gmarket than offline retail stores | ||
PB5 | Gmarket retailers offer good after sales services and respond to my queries in time | ||
Trust (TR) | TR1 | It is safe to pay money and perform a financial transaction on Gmarket retailer’s website | [7,68]; self-developed |
TR2 | The Gmarket retailers will protect my financial-related information from being leaked (hacked) | ||
TR3 | The Gmarket website is secured given that it uses digital certificates | ||
TR4 | The Gmarket retailer’s website will not sell my personal information (e-mail, phone number, names) to others for commercial use | ||
TR5 | The Gmarket retailers deliver the exact quality of product as advertised | ||
Online Shopping Attitudes (OSA) | OSA1 | The idea of buying from Gmarket retailer website is a good idea | [7]; self-developed |
OSA2 | Buying from Gmarket retailer website is better than buying from a real store/shop | ||
OSA3 | Buying from Gmarket retailer website is a pleasant thing to do | ||
OSA4 | Gmarket retailers guarantee me to exchange any damaged items |
Measure | Items | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 148 | 43.79 |
Female | 190 | 56.21 | |
Marital Status | Married | 73 | 21.6 |
Single | 265 | 78.4 | |
Age | 18–26 | 152 | 44.97 |
27–34 | 131 | 38.76 | |
35–43 | 43 | 12.72 | |
44 and above | 12 | 3.55 | |
Shopping Frequency | Once | 85 | 25.15 |
Twice | 78 | 23.08 | |
Three–four times | 80 | 23.67 | |
More than five times | 95 | 28.11 | |
Monthly Income | Less than 1,000,000 | 190 | 56.21 |
1,000,000–2,000,000 | 106 | 31.36 | |
2,000,001–3,000,000 | 17 | 5.03 | |
3,000,001–4,000,000 | 7 | 2.07 | |
More than 4,000,001 | 18 | 5.33 | |
Level of Education | High school | 15 | 4.44 |
Bachelor’s degree | 138 | 40.83 | |
Master’s degree | 141 | 41.72 | |
PhD | 44 | 13.02 |
Variables | AVE | CR | Cronbach’s Alpha | OSA | PB | PWQ | TR | eWOM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSA | 0.6150 | 0.8637 | 0.7897 | 0.7842 | ||||
PB | 0.6200 | 0.8667 | 0.7941 | 0.6463 | 0.7874 | |||
PWQ | 0.5689 | 0.8682 | 0.8102 | 0.5747 | 0.5869 | 0.7543 | ||
TR | 0.6072 | 0.8851 | 0.8377 | 0.6581 | 0.5089 | 0.5288 | 0.7792 | |
eWOM | 0.5278 | 0.8162 | 0.7039 | 0.4451 | 0.4106 | 0.4676 | 0.3862 | 0.7265 |
Indicators | OSA | PB | PWQ | TR | eWOM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eWM1 | 0.2513 | 0.2239 | 0.2871 | 0.2177 | 0.6833 |
eWM3 | 0.3620 | 0.3170 | 0.3858 | 0.2643 | 0.7770 |
eWM4 | 0.2692 | 0.1629 | 0.2727 | 0.2941 | 0.6448 |
eWM5 | 0.3844 | 0.4325 | 0.3913 | 0.3350 | 0.7905 |
OSA1 | 0.8287 | 0.6258 | 0.4987 | 0.5765 | 0.3737 |
OSA2 | 0.7668 | 0.4879 | 0.3980 | 0.4484 | 0.3354 |
OSA3 | 0.8567 | 0.5071 | 0.5235 | 0.5809 | 0.3834 |
OSA4 | 0.6717 | 0.3747 | 0.3599 | 0.4375 | 0.2956 |
PB1 | 0.5462 | 0.8260 | 0.5204 | 0.4622 | 0.3227 |
PB2 | 0.4407 | 0.7871 | 0.4727 | 0.3684 | 0.2799 |
PB3 | 0.5523 | 0.8240 | 0.4448 | 0.4195 | 0.3407 |
PB4 | 0.4877 | 0.7065 | 0.4052 | 0.3418 | 0.3498 |
PWQ1 | 0.4119 | 0.3998 | 0.7398 | 0.3090 | 0.3811 |
PWQ2 | 0.4314 | 0.4405 | 0.7381 | 0.4149 | 0.3195 |
PWQ3 | 0.4112 | 0.4632 | 0.7314 | 0.4417 | 0.3359 |
PWQ4 | 0.4300 | 0.4379 | 0.7495 | 0.3701 | 0.3769 |
PWQ6 | 0.4795 | 0.4679 | 0.8098 | 0.4482 | 0.3538 |
TR1 | 0.5385 | 0.5291 | 0.4924 | 0.7727 | 0.3307 |
TR2 | 0.4699 | 0.2937 | 0.3866 | 0.8072 | 0.2814 |
TR3 | 0.4310 | 0.3272 | 0.3480 | 0.7943 | 0.3157 |
TR4 | 0.5283 | 0.3678 | 0.4170 | 0.8237 | 0.2886 |
TR5 | 0.5629 | 0.4162 | 0.3857 | 0.6916 | 0.2790 |
Hypotheses | Path | Path Coefficient (β) | t Statistics | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | PWQ → PB | 0.5869 | 14.2958 | Supported |
H2 | PWQ → eWOM | 0.3458 | 5.3661 | Supported |
H3 | PWQ → TR | 0.3063 | 4.9776 | Supported |
H4 | PWQ → OSA | 0.1595 | 2.3494 | Supported |
H5 | eWOM → TR | 0.1297 | 2.4951 | Supported |
H6 | PB → OSA | 0.3519 | 5.9355 | Supported |
H7 | TR → OSA | 0.3947 | 8.7566 | Supported |
H8 | PB → eWOM | 0.2077 | 2.8787 | Supported |
H9 | PB → TR | 0.2758 | 4.4949 | Supported |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Baganzi, R.; Shin, G.-C.; Wu, S. Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping. J 2019, 2, 364-383. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2030025
Baganzi R, Shin G-C, Wu S. Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping. J. 2019; 2(3):364-383. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2030025
Chicago/Turabian StyleBaganzi, Ronald, Geon-Cheol Shin, and Shali Wu. 2019. "Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping" J 2, no. 3: 364-383. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2030025
APA StyleBaganzi, R., Shin, G. -C., & Wu, S. (2019). Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping. J, 2(3), 364-383. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2030025