Next Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Abdominal Compliance during CO2 Insufflation in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
Next Article in Special Issue
Concurrent Onset of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion and Inflammation of a Large Maxillary Odontogenic Cyst: Case Report and Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Facial Cellulitis of Unusual Odontogenic Origin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endoscopic Surgical Approach for a Mesiodens in the Nasal Cavity: A Rare Phenomenon
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

Gingival Cyst of the Adult: A Case Description with a Relevant Literature Analysis

by Marta Forte 1,*, Antonio d’Amati 2, Alfonso Manfuso 1, Massimiliano Vittoli 3, Giorgia Girone 3, Eliano Cascardi 2 and Saverio Capodiferro 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 24 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research on Oral Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript could be interesting for the journal readers. However, I have some important concerns about this kind of report.

 

1.        Abstract: Please prepare the abstract according to the requirements of the journal (without subheadings).

 

2.        Keywords: Please review if these words are MeSH terms.

 

3.        Background: Please explain with clarity the scientific rationale for this study.  It is important to define the study justification in terms of what is the main contribution to the literature.

 

4.        Methods- Results- Discussion:

 

Please prepare the manuscript according to the CARE guidelines available in: https://www.equator-network.org/

 

Please mention the limitations of this report since this kind of study has the low scientific evidence.

 

Please mention implications for research in dentistry.

Author Response

  1. Abstract: Please prepare the abstract according to the requirements of the journal (without subheadings).

DONE

 

  1. Keywords: Please review if these words are MeSH terms.

DONE

 

  1. Background: Please explain with clarity the scientific rationale for this study.  It is important to define the study justification in terms of what is the main contribution to the literature.

DONE

 

  1. Methods- Results- Discussion:

Please prepare the manuscript according to the CARE guidelines available in: https://www.equator-network.org/

 DONE

 

 

Please mention the limitations of this report since this kind of study has the low scientific evidence.

DONE

 

Please mention implications for research in dentistry.

DONE

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This case report has nothing new to learn for the reader.

Author Response

This case report has nothing new to learn for the reader.

The report is about a rare occurence of odontogenic lesion; we decided to report it as well documented clinically and histologically too, and also because a discussion about the cases reported in literature has been included, mainly pointing the attention on the differential diagnosis and the differences in radiological appearance.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I thank the authors for choosing to share their case of adult gingival cyst with the scientific community.

The manuscript is clear and easy to read, however I would suggest improving the English sentence constructions that seem to be a translation of another spoken language. 

With regard to the presentation of the case, I would suggest expanding the description, going into more detail, both on the patient's characteristics, e.g. whether she was taking any medication or had any pathology, and on other aspects (e.g. how the surgery was performed and with what instruments).

Finally, I believe that, considering the authors' stated aim ’We describe a case of gingival cyst occurring in an adult patient to analyse the 

clinical, radiographic and histopathological features as guidelines for the differential diagnosis; an analysis of the related relevant literature has been discussed too', a more systematically elaborated discussion is necessary to analyse the differential diagnosis from a clinical, radiographic and histopathological point of view.

Currently from 94 to 101 there is the clinical differential diagnosis with some lesions, and from 85 to 93 histological and a hint of radiographic but with another type of lesion.

The manuscript is well structured, some improvements could make it even more comprehensive.

Line 102: check the abbreviation GCA.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The manuscript is clear and easy to read, however I would suggest improving the English sentence constructions that seem to be a translation of another spoken language. 

Author Response

The manuscript is clear and easy to read, however I would suggest improving the English sentence constructions that seem to be a translation of another spoken language.

DONE TROGHOUT THE PAPER

With regard to the presentation of the case, I would suggest expanding the description, going into more detail, both on the patient's characteristics, e.g. whether she was taking any medication or had any pathology, and on other aspects (e.g. how the surgery was performed and with what instruments).

DONE

Finally, I believe that, considering the authors' stated aim ’We describe a case of gingival cyst occurring in an adult patient to analyse the

 

clinical, radiographic and histopathological features as guidelines for the differential diagnosis; an analysis of the related relevant literature has been discussed too', a more systematically elaborated discussion is necessary to analyse the differential diagnosis from a clinical, radiographic and histopathological point of view.

WE WELL UNDERSTAND THE SUGGESTION OF REVIEWR 3, BUT WE DECIDE TO DISCUSS IN THE REPORT ONLY THE MAIN PAPERS ABOUT THE TOPIC, CHOOSING THEM BETWEEN THE PAPERS WITH LARGE NUMBER OF CASES AS TO REPORT MORE DATAILES ABOUT THE CLINNICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL APPEARANCE OF GC. FOR THE SAME REASON THE PAPER WAS SUBMITTED AS CASE REPORT AND NOT AS REVIEW OF THE LITARATURE

Currently from 94 to 101 there is the clinical differential diagnosis with some lesions, and from 85 to 93 histological and a hint of radiographic but with another type of lesion.

IN THIS SECTION WE TRY TO COLLECT ALL DATA ABOUT DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS EMERGIN FROM THE STUDY PUBLISHED IN LITERATURE REPORTING ON LARGE NUMBER OF GC

The manuscript is well structured, some improvements could make it even more comprehensive.

DONE

Line 102: check the abbreviation GCA.

DONE

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript can be accepted

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I do not think so; it is helpful for the reader.  Kindly upload the post-surgical photo (after the surgical removal of the cyst) and the cyst photo, and the suturing photo. It may be rare, but it is readily available on the internet. you can find the following article 

Mota ME, Oliveira DMA, Medeiros YL, Moreira MS, Lopes RN, Alves FA, Louredo BVR, Vargas PA, Prado JD. Gingival cyst of the adult. Autops Case Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13:e2023454. doi: 10.4322/acr.2023.454. PMID: 38034522; PMCID: PMC10688211.

Frigerio M, Al Eid R, Lombardi T. A Rare Odontogenic Cyst: Gingival Cyst of the Adult. A Case Report and Review of the Literature in Elderly Patients. Case Rep Dent. 2023 Jul 26;2023:4827611. doi: 10.1155/2023/4827611. PMID: 37546573; PMCID: PMC10397494.

Back to TopTop