Next Article in Journal
Derivation of Meson Masses in SU(3) and SU(4) Extended Linear Sigma Model at Finite Temperature
Next Article in Special Issue
Spin Physics at PHENIX
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Rare Decays in CMS
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering †

by
Nicole Schermer
on behalf of the NUCLEUS Collaboration
Physics Department E15, Technical University of Munich, James-Franck-Strasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
This paper is based on the talk at the 13th International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics (ICNFP 2024), Crete, Greece, 26 August–4 September 2024.
Particles 2025, 8(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010008
Submission received: 13 December 2024 / Revised: 14 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 22 January 2025

Abstract

:
The NUCLEUS experiment, currently being commissioned at the Technical University of Munich, is designed to observe coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering ( CE ν NS ) from reactor neutrinos and measure its cross-section with a percent-level precision at recoil energies below 100   eV . As a Standard Model process, CE ν NS provides a unique probe into neutrino properties, potential new physics, and background suppression techniques relevant to dark matter experiments. The experiment utilizes gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters operating at 10   mK with an energy threshold of 20   eV . Situated at a shallow overburden of 3 m of water equivalent, the experimental site necessitates an advanced shielding strategy combining active vetoes and passive layers to reduce background rates to approximately 100 counts / ( kg · day · keV ) , as confirmed by full setup simulations. The commissioning phase has successfully demonstrated the stable operation of the cryogenic target detectors, achieving baseline resolutions below 10   eV , and the integration of the various shielding systems. Following this milestone, the experiment is set to transition to the EdF Chooz B nuclear reactor in France in 2025, where it will enable precise measurements of CE ν NS , contributing to the understanding of neutrino interactions and advancing the field of astroparticle physics.

1. CE ν NS from Reactor Antineutrinos

Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering ( CE ν NS ) is a Standard Model process that offers a valuable probe of the Standard Model validity and new physics. The first observation of CE ν NS was conducted in 2017 by the COHERENT collaboration using a 14.6   kg CsI[Na] scintillation crystal at the Spallation Neutron Source [1] which provides a pulsed neutrino beam with a flux of 4.3 · 10 7 ν / ( s · cm 2 ) at 20   m from the source, with neutrino energies up to 53   MeV . A subsequent COHERENT measurement using argon [2] and germanium [3] probed the N 2 -dependence of the CE ν NS cross-section.
Nuclear reactors, with a neutrino flux of O ( 10 20 ) ν /( s · GW th ), are promising for CE ν NS studies at lower energies. Reactor antineutrinos are produced in fission beta-decays and have energies up to 10   MeV , which place them fully within the coherent mode. CE ν NS from reactor neutrinos allows researchers to measure the weak neutral current and the Weinberg angle at low momentum transfer, while deviations could indicate new physics [4].
Despite ongoing efforts in various collaborations, detecting CE ν NS at nuclear reactors remains challenging [5]. As of December 2024, the only detection of CE ν NS at a reactor was reported at the Dresden-II facility [6]; however, this finding conflicts with more sensitive searches conducted by the CONUS experiment [7]. The main challenges in observing CE ν NS from nuclear reactors are achieving sub-keV detection thresholds of nuclear recoils and managing background levels in shallow-depth reactor environments [5]. The NUCLEUS experiment addresses both challenges by combining gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters with energy thresholds of around 20   eV with a target background rate of 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) [8,9].

2. The NUCLEUS Experiment

The NUCLEUS experimental site, referred to as the “Very Near Site” (VNS) at the Chooz B Nuclear Power Plant in France, occupies a 25   m 2 room in the basement of an administrative building, positioned 102   m and 72   m from the two 4.25   GW th reactor cores. This proximity ensures a high average electron antineutrino flux of approximately 1.7 · 10 12   ν ¯ e /(s · cm2) [9]. However, the low overburden of 3 m of water equivalent (m.w.e.) necessitates a robust cosmic-ray-induced background mitigation strategy. To achieve the desired background level of 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) , multiple layers of passive and active shielding are required [9]. Within the region of interest (ROI), spanning the range from 20   e V to 100   e V , the NUCLEUS experiment anticipates a total counting rate of 30 ν ¯ e / (kg · day) above the background [10]. The shielding strategy was studied and optimized by Monte Carlo simulations based on measurements at the VNS [11].

2.1. The NUCLEUS Target Detectors: Gram-Scale Cryogenic Calorimeters

The NUCLEUS experiment uses gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters of Calcium Tungstate ( CaWO 4 ) and Sapphire ( Al 2 O 3 ), with a total target mass of 10   g . When a particle induces a nuclear recoil in the target crystal, the generated lattice vibrations propagate through the crystal via phonons. These phonons are detected by a tungsten-based transition edge sensor (W-TES) operating at the transition temperature of the tungsten film at around 10   mK [9]. The slight increase in temperature from the particle interaction results in a significant change in the TES resistance, which is read out by Superconducting QUantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs) [12]. This technology was developed within the CRESST experiment, which focuses on dark matter searches [13] and was further advanced by the NUCLEUS experiment for CE ν NS detection. A prototype utilizing 0.5   g of Al 2 O 3 demonstrated the proof of principle for this detection method [8,12]. To take advantage of the N 2 -dependence of the CE ν NS cross-section, the experiment employs a multi-target approach, featuring an array of nine CaWO 4 crystals ( 6   g ) for CE ν NS measurements and nine Al 2 O 3 crystals ( 4   g ) for in situ background assessment [9]. The CaWO 4 detectors are expected to capture the CE ν NS signal above the background; in contrast, the Al 2 O 3 detectors will have a suppressed neutrino scattering rate, providing an in situ measurement of the background. This background measurement with Al 2 O 3 allows us to constrain the background model more precisely, thereby enhancing our sensitivity to CE ν NS [9].

2.2. The NUCLEUS Inner Detector Module for the First Physics Run at Chooz

An inner detector module consisting of nine target detectors and a dedicated holding structure is currently being developed for NUCLEUS’ first physics run at the nuclear power plant in Chooz. The first version of the module was built with detectors equipped with a single TES, while ongoing research investigates detectors with two TESs as an additional background-mitigation tool [14] which might be implemented in future versions.
As depicted in Figure 1, these nine target detector crystals are secured by two TES-instrumented silicon plates that serve as an inner veto system for background rejection, targeting events related to surface interactions on the one hand and to mechanical stress-relaxation on the other hand. The latter is a potential candidate for the low energy excess (LEE), a phenomenon observed across low-threshold experiments, characterized by a steep rise in event rate below a few hundred eV [15]. Simultaneous readouts from both the target detector and the holder can identify events originating from their interface. The inner veto consists of a rigid 0.45   mm thick and a flexible 0.25   mm thin silicon plate. To minimize the contact area between the target crystals and the support structure and thereby prevent signal phonons from escaping detection in the TES of the target crystals, the contact points are implemented by silicon pyramids. These pyramids with a height of 0.2   mm are machined by the wet chemical etching of the inner veto plates and can be seen in the right insert of Figure 1. The detectors and inner veto plates are secured by two 1   mm thick silicon holding plates that provide all necessary electrical and thermal connections for the operation of the detectors and the inner veto system. Furthermore, the contact between the non-instrumented holding plates and the inner veto parts is facilitated by 1   mm thick Al 2 O 3 spheres, ensuring electrical and thermal isolation. The height of the brass separation shells defines the force bending the thin inner veto silicon wafer, securing the target detectors. For the first physics run at Chooz, we target to deploy one inner detector module from CaWO 4 detectors ( 6   g ) and one from Al 2 O 3 detectors ( 4   g ), representing the NUCLEUS- 10 g target detector module.

2.3. Active and Passive Shielding Layers for Background Mitigation

The NUCLEUS experiment employs a multi-layered shielding strategy, which is shown in Figure 2, combining active and passive components to effectively suppress background signals and ensure the high sensitivity required for CE ν NS detection.
The cryogenic outer veto (COV) combines six high-purity germanium detectors with a total mass of 4   kg and a thickness of 2.5   cm , operated as ionized semiconductor detectors at around 10   mK . The six COV crystals are held in place by a copper structure arranged to supply a 4 π coverage around the two inner detector modules to significantly reduce ambient gamma-ray backgrounds. In addition, three layers of passive shielding are arranged inside and outside the cryostat for 4 π coverage to suppress remaining critical background components. The first layer represents the boron carbide ( B 4 C ) shield enclosed within the cryostat and surrounding the COV, which serves as the primary barrier against low-energy neutron backgrounds. The second layer, consisting of borated polyethylene, provides a barrier against neutrons. The final third layer consists of lead and offers an additional attenuation of gamma and neutron backgrounds. To address cosmic-ray muons, the outermost veto comprises 5   cm thick plastic scintillator plates equipped with silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) and Wavelength Shifting fibers, achieving a detection threshold of 5   MeV and a simulated efficiency for muon identification of > 99 % [16]. This muon veto system detects high-energy muons, which generate spallation neutrons in the lead shielding, a significant background mimicking CE ν NS -like nuclear recoils. The muon veto system and the lead and polyethylene shieldings are deployed both outside and inside the cryostat to ensure complete coverage around the cryogenic detectors. The structure inside the cryostat includes a cryogenic muon veto disk, a lead disk, and several polyethylene disks, mimicking the external shielding structure. The cryogenic muon veto disk has been developed [17] to be deployed inside the cryostat above the boron carbide shield and thermalized to 800   mK . Monte Carlo simulations showed the ability of the nearly 4 π -covering active and passive shielding layers to mitigate the cosmic and radiogenic background components to meet the goal of 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) in the ROI [10,11,18].

3. Development of the Cryogenic Target Detectors for the Long Background Run to Commission the NUCLEUS Experiment at TUM

Over the course of 2023 and 2024, the various detector and shielding components were installed in the underground laboratory (UGL) at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) to commission the experiment. The commission phase involved several runs over the course of these two years to commission the sub-systems and concluded in a long background run (LBR) to demonstrate the stable operation of the full system. The major goal is to demonstrate the performance of the cryogenic target detectors in anti-coincidence with the COV and the muon veto systems and to validate our shielding strategy by comparing the measured to the simulated background data for the UGL site [19].

3.1. Cryogenic Target Detectors

While developing the cryogenic target detectors, we evaluated the performance of CaWO 4 and Al 2 O 3 as target materials. As of December 2024, we demonstrated the reliable performance of both materials in a series of measurements conducted in the customized NUCLEUS dry dilution refrigerator. These detectors consistently achieved baseline resolutions of less than 10 eV over several weeks of operation across multiple runs. Two Al 2 O 3 target detectors were simultaneously operated in the NUCLEUS inner detector module, achieving similar baseline resolutions and no cross-talk [19]. Meanwhile, other CaWO 4 and Al 2 O 3 detectors were operated in simplified copper holders, as efforts are ongoing to develop the TES-instrumented silicon holding structures for anti-coincidence operation with the target detectors.
Multiple CaWO 4 detectors demonstrated excellent energy resolution of less than 10 eV over several weeks in various runs, enabling the development and validation of calibration techniques for cryogenic particle detectors. Specifically, a CaWO 4 detector was calibrated using nuclear recoils with the CRAB method [20] to investigate differences between nuclear and electron recoils. Another CaWO 4 detector was calibrated with sub-keV X-ray fluorescence lines and LED pulses [21], allowing us to explore detector non-linearities.
In addition to a detector cube with a single TES, we investigated detectors with two TESs (=the double-TES approach), developed to test a plausible source of the LEE in TES-based detectors: events arising from stress at the interface between the TES and the crystal or within the TES structure itself. Detectors with two TESs were tested to enable simultaneous and independent signal readout. In this configuration, particle recoils originating from the crystal volume are expected to distribute their energy among the sensors, while signals from TES-related events occurring near a specific TES would predominantly or entirely be measured by the closest TES. This approach was validated by CRESST [22,23] and SPICE [24] and further advanced by the NUCLEUS collaboration [14,25], with double-TES detectors achieving sub- 100   eV -thresholds, enabling precise LEE measurements and event differentiation.
Finally, for the LBR, we deployed a CaWO 4 single-TES detector cube with a 5   mm side length and a mass of 0.75   g , as is shown in the left photograph of Figure 3, as well as a Al 2 O 3 double-TES detector measuring [ 5 × 5 × 7.5 ] mm 3 with the same mass, shown in the photograph in the middle of Figure 3. Both detectors were operated at their transition temperature of approximately 14   mK . The goal of using these two target detectors was to characterize the particle background in the different target materials and further evaluate the background mitigation potential of the double-TES approach.

3.2. Development of the Target Detector Holders

Figure 4 shows the components of the detector holders of our cryogenic target detectors used for preparing the LBR. Each detector is completely encapsulated by a copper housing to block thermal radiation from the outside and secured with bronze clamps, as seen in the right picture of Figure 3. Al 2 O 3 spheres are used for thermal and electrical isolation between the copper holder, the clamps, and the detector itself. The signal readout is facilitated by printed circuit board (PCB) traces that connect the TES wire bonds to external pin connections, where cables for the TES readout are attached. During the development phase, commercial PCBs with FR 4 -cores, as shown in the left picture of Figure 4, were initially used. However, they were deemed unsuitable for the LBR due to radioactive impurities that would dominate the signal observed in our detectors [11,18]. In contrast, the customized PCB, seen in the right picture of Figure 4, is made from copper and features copper-kapton-copper traces glued to the copper plate. To further reduce background from impurities, all copper parts were fabricated from electrolytic tough pitch (NOSV) copper [26] due to its high purity and low oxygen content, enhancing the intrinsic thermal conductivity. Additionally, all components of the holders undergo a rigorous cleaning procedure involving isopropyl alcohol and acetone, followed by etching with citric acid in a hydrogen peroxide solution to effectively remove any oxidation layers and improve thermal conductivity.

3.3. Status of the Commissioning

The LBR to commission the full NUCLEUS experiment at TUM concluded in September 2024, demonstrating the stable performance of the cryogenic target detectors with most of the active and passive shielding systems over more than a month. During the LBR, the full muon veto system, comprising 28 Si-PM panels and an additional cold muon veto disk, was successfully operated for approximately 40 days. The outer and inner shielding, consisting of lead and polyethylene layers, were deployed, while the B 4 C layer was dispensable due to the higher overburden at the UGL site compared to the Chooz site [11].
We implemented one CaWO 4 detector with single-TES readout and one Al 2 O 3 detector with double-TES readout, both calibrated using a customized LED calibration system [27]. Initial analyses confirmed the stable operation of both detectors over nearly 500 h each with approximately 80% of usable physics data with stable baseline resolutions below 20 eV, achieving the targeted performance metrics. Additionally, one of the six COV Ge crystals was deployed above the target detectors and successfully operated at the same time. Detailed analyses of the cryogenic detectors in anti-coincidence with the COV and muon veto systems, as well as investigations of the low-energy excess (LEE) and the comparison of the measured to simulated background level, are currently ongoing.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

The NUCLEUS experiment aims to observe CE ν NS from reactor neutrinos at the Chooz Nuclear Power Plant using gram-scale cryogenic calorimeters with a threshold of 20   eV . Operating at a shallow overburden of 3 m.w.e., the experimental site requires a robust shielding strategy combining active vetoes and passive layers to achieve the low background rate of approximately 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) necessary for successful CE ν NS detection. The long background run to commission the NUCLEUS experiment at the underground laboratory of the Technical University of Munich demonstrates the stable operation of all systems over a one-month period, confirming the integration of the cryogenic target detectors and their radio-pure holding systems.
Following this milestone, the installation at the Chooz Nuclear Power Plant is planned for 2025, enabling the NUCLEUS experiment to investigate neutrino interactions. Efforts to address the LEE through innovative detector designs are ongoing. For the first physics run, a detector module with 10   g of cryogenic detectors is under development to achieve an initial CE ν NS measurement. A second phase, featuring a larger detector with a target mass of approximately 1 kg , is planned to enable precision measurements of the CE ν NS cross-section with several-percent accuracy [9].

Funding

This work has been financed by the CEA, the INFN and the ÖAW and partially supported by the TU Munich and the MPI für Physik. NUCLEUS members acknowledge additional funding by the DFG through the SFB1258 and the Excellence Cluster ORIGINS, by the European Commission through the ERC-StG2018-804228 “NU-CLEUS”, by the P2IO LabEx (ANR-10-LABX-0038) in the framework “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-IDEX-0003-01) managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), France, and by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through the “P 34778-N, ELOISE”.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are part of an ongoing study that will be published in a separate detailed paper about the long background run and about the simulations performed for the NUCLEUS experiment. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to nicole.schermer@tum.de.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CE ν NS Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering
m.w.e.Meters of water equivalent
ROIRegion of interest
TESTransition edge sensor
LEELow energy excess
COVCryogenic outer veto
SiPMsSilicon photomultipliers
UGLUnderground laboratory
TUMTechnical University of Munich
LBRLong background run
PCBPrinted circuit board

References

  1. Akimov, D.; Albert, J.B.; An, P.; Awe, C.; Barbeau, P.S.; Becker, B.; Belov, V.; Brown, A.; Bolozdynya, A.; Cabrera-Palmer, B.; et al. Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering. Science 2017, 357, 1123–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Akimov, D.; Albert, J.B.; An, P.; Awe, C.; Barbeau, P.S.; Becker, B.; Belov, V.; Brown, A.; Bolozdynya, A.; Cabrera-Palmer, B.; et al. First Measurement of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering on Argon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adamski, S.; Ahn, M.; Barbeau, P.S.; Belov, V.; Bernardi, I.; Bock, C.; Bolozdynya, A.; Bouabid, R.; Browning, J.; Cabrera-Palmer, B.; et al. First detection of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on germanium. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.13806. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13806. [Google Scholar]
  4. Akimov, D.; Albert, J.B.; An, P.; Awe, C.; Barbeau, P.S.; Becker, B.; Belov, V.; Bernardi, I.; Blackston, M.A.; Blokland, L.; et al. Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering: Terrestrial and astrophysical applications. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2203.07361 https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07361. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowen, M.; Huber, P. Reactor neutrino applications and coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 053008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Colaresi, J.; Collar, J.I.; Hossbach, T.W.; Lewis, C.M.; Yocum, K.M. Measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering from reactor antineutrinos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 129, 211802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ackermann, N.; Bonet, H.; Bonhomme, A.; Buck, C.; Fülber, K.; Hakenmüller, J.; Hempfling, J.; Henrichs, J.; Heusser, G.; Lindner, M.; et al. Final CONUS results on coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering at the Brokdorf reactor. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.07684. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Strauss, R.; Rothe, J.; Angloher, G.; Bento, A.; Gütlein, A.; Hauff, D.; Kluck, H.; Mancuso, M.; Oberauer, L.; Petricca, F.; et al. The ν-cleus experiment: A gram-scale fiducial-volume cryogenic detector for the first detection of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering. Eur. Phys. J. C 2017, 77, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. NUCLEUS Collaboration. Exploring CEνNS with NUCLEUS at the Chooz nuclear power plant. Eur. Phys. J. C 2019, 79, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goupy, C.; Abele, H.; Angloher, G.; Bento, A.; Canonica, L.; Cappella, F.; Cardani, L.; Casali, N.; Cerulli, R.; Colantoni, I.; et al. Exploring coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering of reactor neutrinos with the NUCLEUS experiment. SciPost Phys. Proc. 2023, 12, 053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goupy, C. Background Mitigation Strategy for the Detection of Coherent Elastic Scattering of Reactor Antineutrinos on Nuclei with the NUCLEUS Experiment. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rothe, J.F.M. Low-Threshold Cryogenic Detectors for Low-Mass Dark Matter Search and Coherent Neutrino Scattering. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abdelhameed, A.H.; Angloher, G.; Bauer, P.; Bento, A.; Bertoldo, E.; Bucci, C. First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 102002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaznacheeva, M. Exploring the Sub-keV Energy Region with the CRESST and NUCLEUS Experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  15. Adari, P.; Aguilar-Arevalo, A.A.; Amidei, D.; Angloher, G.; Armengaud, E.; Augier, C.; Balogh, L.; Banik, S.; Baxter, D.; Beaufort, C.; et al. EXCESS workshop: Descriptions of rising low-energy spectra. SciPost Phys. Proc. 2022, 9, 001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wagner, V.; Rogly, R.; Erhart, A.; Savu, V.; Goupy, C.; Lhuillier, D.; Vivier, M.; Klinkenberg, L.; Angloher, G.; Bento, A.; et al. Development of a compact muon veto for the NUCLEUS experiment. J. Instrum. 2022, 17, T05020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Erhart, A.; Wagner, V.; Wex, A.; Goupy, C.; Lhuillier, D.; Namuth, E.; Nones, C.; Rogly, R.; Savu, V.; Schwarz, M.; et al. A plastic scintillation muon veto for sub-Kelvin temperatures. Eur. Phys. J. C 2024, 84, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goupy, C. Estimation of (Particle) Backgrounds at Sub-keV Energies for the NUCLEUS CEvNS Experiment. Talk Presented at the Magnificent CEvNS Workshop, 2024, Valencia. Available online: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1342813/contributions/5913888/ (accessed on 2 December 2024).
  19. Bossio, E. Status of the NUCLEUS Experiment. Talk Presented at the Magnificent CEvNSWorkshop, 2024, Valencia. Available online: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1342813/contributions/5913874/ (accessed on 2 December 2024).
  20. Abele, H.; Angloher, G.; Bento, A.; Canonica, L.; Cappella, F.; Cardani, L.; Casali, N.; Chalil, A. Observation of a Nuclear Recoil Peak at the 100 eV Scale Induced by Neutron Capture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 211802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Peters, L. A New Data Analysis Tool for NUCLEUS and First Results from the Commissioning Phase. Poster Presented at the Magnificent CEvNS Workshop, 2024, Valencia. Available online: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1342813/contributions/5913902/ (accessed on 10 December 2024).
  22. Angloher, G.; Banik, S.; Benato, G.; Bento, A.; Bertolini, A.; Breier, R.; Bucci, C.; Burkhart, J.; Canonica, L.; D’Addabbo, A.; et al. DoubleTES detectors to investigate the CRESST low energy background: Results from above-ground prototypes. Eur. Phys. J. C 2024, 84, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pucci, F. Results of doubleTES Detectors, Talk Presented at the EXCESS23@TAUP Workshop. 2023. Available online: https://indi.to/cMmfR (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  24. Romani, R. Observations of the LEE in a Two Channel SPICE Athermal Phonon Detector. Talk Presented at the EXCESS@TAUP Workshop, 2023. Available online: https://indi.to/w9kP6 (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  25. Kaznacheeva, M. New Excess Measurements from NUCLEUS. Talk Presented at the EXCESS24 Workshop. 2024. Available online: https://agenda.infn.it/event/39007/contributions/235288/ (accessed on 11 December 2024).
  26. Aurubis. Available online: https://www.aurubis.com/ (accessed on 8 January 2024).
  27. Del Castello, G. Calibration and Commissioning Results of the NUCLEUS Experiment. Ph.D. Thesis, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Photographs of a NUCLEUS inner detector module: (Left) Nine detector cubes equipped with a transition edge sensor (TES). (Middle) The first version of the detector module consisting of (a) nine Al 2 O 3 cubes, each equipped with a TES, which are secured by (b) two TES-instrumented thin silicon plates that serve as the inner veto for the background rejection of events originating from both mechanical stress and surface events in the target detectors. This system is secured by (c) two non-instrumented thicker silicon plates equipped with electrical connections. (Right) A silicon inner veto plate with a zoom on the etched pyramids which allow contact between the holding structures and the target detectors to be minimized, reducing phonon escape and preserving detection efficiency.
Figure 1. Photographs of a NUCLEUS inner detector module: (Left) Nine detector cubes equipped with a transition edge sensor (TES). (Middle) The first version of the detector module consisting of (a) nine Al 2 O 3 cubes, each equipped with a TES, which are secured by (b) two TES-instrumented thin silicon plates that serve as the inner veto for the background rejection of events originating from both mechanical stress and surface events in the target detectors. This system is secured by (c) two non-instrumented thicker silicon plates equipped with electrical connections. (Right) A silicon inner veto plate with a zoom on the etched pyramids which allow contact between the holding structures and the target detectors to be minimized, reducing phonon escape and preserving detection efficiency.
Particles 08 00008 g001
Figure 2. CAD rendering of the NUCLEUS experiment setup. (leftright) The full apparatus showing the mechanical shielding structure (dark blue). (a) The muon veto system (orange), composed of 28 individual 5   cm thick scintillator panels and an additional cryogenic extensions inside the croystat, mitigates cosmic-ray muons. (b) A 5-cm thick lead layer (gray) inside and outside the cryostat provides attenuation for gamma radiation. (c) A 20   cm thick borated polyethylene layer (yellow) inside and outside the cryostat reduces neutron backgrounds. (d) The cryostat houses the dry dilution refrigerator, including (e) a 4   cm boron carbide layer (black) and (f) the cryogenic outer veto (COV) (light blue), made of six high-purity germanium detectors, arranged in (g) a copper holding structure (brown). The two inner detector modules of nine cubes of (i) CaWO 4 and (j) Al 2 O 3 , held by (h) the silicon inner veto structure, are placed at the center to maximize the 4 π -shielding coverage, ensuring a low background rate of below 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) .
Figure 2. CAD rendering of the NUCLEUS experiment setup. (leftright) The full apparatus showing the mechanical shielding structure (dark blue). (a) The muon veto system (orange), composed of 28 individual 5   cm thick scintillator panels and an additional cryogenic extensions inside the croystat, mitigates cosmic-ray muons. (b) A 5-cm thick lead layer (gray) inside and outside the cryostat provides attenuation for gamma radiation. (c) A 20   cm thick borated polyethylene layer (yellow) inside and outside the cryostat reduces neutron backgrounds. (d) The cryostat houses the dry dilution refrigerator, including (e) a 4   cm boron carbide layer (black) and (f) the cryogenic outer veto (COV) (light blue), made of six high-purity germanium detectors, arranged in (g) a copper holding structure (brown). The two inner detector modules of nine cubes of (i) CaWO 4 and (j) Al 2 O 3 , held by (h) the silicon inner veto structure, are placed at the center to maximize the 4 π -shielding coverage, ensuring a low background rate of below 100   counts / ( kg · day · keV ) .
Particles 08 00008 g002
Figure 3. Photographs of the target detectors used in the LBR. (Left) A CaWO 4 detector cube equipped with a single TES. (Middle) An Al 2 O 3 double-TES detector, featuring two independent TES sensors to investigate the LEE by differentiating crystal-originated signals from TES-related events. (Right) A detector cube mounted in a copper holder, secured by bronze clamps and thermally isolated using Al 2 O 3 spheres between the detector and the clamp and the copper housing.
Figure 3. Photographs of the target detectors used in the LBR. (Left) A CaWO 4 detector cube equipped with a single TES. (Middle) An Al 2 O 3 double-TES detector, featuring two independent TES sensors to investigate the LEE by differentiating crystal-originated signals from TES-related events. (Right) A detector cube mounted in a copper holder, secured by bronze clamps and thermally isolated using Al 2 O 3 spheres between the detector and the clamp and the copper housing.
Particles 08 00008 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of the CaWO 4 detector cube mounted in different copper holders for the Long Background Run (LBR). (Left) A copper holder with a commercial PCB featuring an FR 4 -core, which was later replaced due to radioactive impurities affecting the particle background. (Right) A refined copper holder equipped with a customized PCB made from copper-kapton-copper traces, ensuring minimal radioactive background. Both holders are made of NOSV copper and all components underwent rigorous cleaning and etching processes to improve thermal conductivity.
Figure 4. Photographs of the CaWO 4 detector cube mounted in different copper holders for the Long Background Run (LBR). (Left) A copper holder with a commercial PCB featuring an FR 4 -core, which was later replaced due to radioactive impurities affecting the particle background. (Right) A refined copper holder equipped with a customized PCB made from copper-kapton-copper traces, ensuring minimal radioactive background. Both holders are made of NOSV copper and all components underwent rigorous cleaning and etching processes to improve thermal conductivity.
Particles 08 00008 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schermer, N., on behalf of the NUCLEUS Collaboration. Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering. Particles 2025, 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010008

AMA Style

Schermer N on behalf of the NUCLEUS Collaboration. Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering. Particles. 2025; 8(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schermer, Nicole on behalf of the NUCLEUS Collaboration. 2025. "Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering" Particles 8, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010008

APA Style

Schermer, N., on behalf of the NUCLEUS Collaboration. (2025). Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering. Particles, 8(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop