Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Long-Term Ageing Studies on Eco-Friendly Resistive Plate Chamber Detectors
Previous Article in Journal
Surrogate Model for In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group Method Using Dynamic Mode Decomposition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of the NUCLEUS Detector to Explore Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spin Physics at PHENIX †

by
Devon Loomis
on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration
Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040, USA
This paper is based on the talk at the 13th International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics (ICNFP 2024), Crete, Greece, 26 August–4 September 2024.
Particles 2025, 8(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010014
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 25 January 2025 / Accepted: 8 February 2025 / Published: 10 February 2025

Abstract

:
Situated at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory, the PHENIX experiment has for almost two decades been at the forefront of investigations into spin structure and dynamics in high-energy nuclear physics. Although decommissioned in 2016, the PHENIX collaboration has released a number of new results over the past several years that continue to inform the field. Recent longitudinal spin measurements uncover the role of gluon and sea quark polarization in the proton. Transverse spin measurements probe the transverse momentum-dependent (TMD) distributions and higher-twist multiparton correlators that are needed to fully explain partonic dynamics in the initial and final state. Additionally, the effects of heavy ions on spin have been studied by comparing transverse spin measurements between p+p and p+A collisions. These recent results and their wider implications are presented.

1. Introduction

As the lightest stable bound state in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the proton serves as an excellent laboratory for investigating quarks and gluons—together known as partons—and the hadronic bound states that they form. By polarizing the proton, additional spin degrees of freedom become available as a tool to further test this interplay between the partons and hadrons. The research field of nuclear spin physics takes advantage of these tools to explore fundamental questions related to the structure and dynamics of QCD and its bound states. One of the central questions in the field is how the spin of the proton arises from its fundamental constituents. The proton spin can be decomposed into contributions from the quark polarization, the gluon polarization, and their respective orbital angular momentum [1],
1 2 = 1 2 q + g + L q + L g ,
where the quark and gluon polarization contributions can be written as the integrals of their respective helicity distributions over Bjorken-x, q = 0 1 q ( x ) d x and g = 0 1 g ( x ) d x . The quark polarization sum runs over the valence and sea quarks, q = u + u ¯ + d + d ¯ + s + s ¯ . These helicity distributions describe the difference in longitudinally polarized proton densities with partons of positive versus negative helicity. Measurements in polarized deep-inelastic scattering (DIS) [2,3,4,5,6] and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering (SIDIS) [7,8] have helped constrain the contribution from the quark helicity to ∼30% of the total proton spin. While polarized DIS can access g at next-to-leading order (NLO) through photon–gluon fusion, polarized proton collisions at RHIC offer improved sensitivity to the gluon helicity through leading-order (LO) quark–gluon and gluon–gluon interactions. Measurements sensitive to g from PHENIX [9,10,11] and its counterpart experiment STAR [12,13,14] led to the first evidence of significant nonzero gluon polarization at x > 0.05 [15,16]. Recent measurements at RHIC, with both larger luminosity datasets and higher collision center-of-mass energies, are focused on pushing towards smaller uncertainties and exploring the small-x region of the gluon helicity.
Helicity distributions are just one of a set of distributions that generalize the standard unpolarized parton distribution functions (PDFs) to account for the polarizations of both the partons and the proton. These PDFs can in general depend on the partonic transverse momentum k T and are therefore called Transverse Momentum-Dependent (TMD) PDFs. In the case of the unpolarized PDFs, the helicity distributions, and the transversity distributions (the analogue of helicity distributions for transversely polarized protons), the k T dependence integrates out and the distributions describe correlations between the spin of the parton and the spin of the proton. The remaining TMDs explicitly depend on k T and encode correlations between the partonic momentum and the proton spin. A set of corresponding TMD fragmentation functions (FFs) exists in the final state, describing spin–momentum correlations between the struck parton and the hadron that it fragments into. The two most prominent examples of TMDs in spin physics are the Sivers TMD PDF [17,18], which correlates the transverse momentum of an initial-state parton with the transverse spin of the proton, and the Collins TMD FF [19], which correlates the transverse spin of a struck quark with preferential directions of the fragmenting hadrons. Both of these functions have been measured to be nonzero through azimuthal asymmetries observed in particle production from SIDIS [20,21,22,23,24,25,26] and electron-positron annihilation [27].
Experimental access to TMDs relies on the availability of two scales, scale Q to separate out the partonic-level hard scattering, and soft scale k T Q that is sensitive to the non-perturbative partonic transverse momentum. In measurements with only one accessible scale (the hard scale Q), such as high p T production of inclusive particles from hadronic collisions, it is more natural to describe the PDFs and FFs in their collinear limit. In this framework, one encounters correlation terms at n = 3 in the 1 / Q n 2 factorization expansion of the cross-section (where n is the twist). These twist-3 correlation functions describe quantum interference between the scattering amplitudes of a single active parton and a composite parton state with an extra gluon. They can describe multiparton quark–gluon [28,29] or trigluon [30,31] correlations. When convoluted together with the standard PDFs and FFs, the twist-3 correlators can generate azimuthal asymmetries in particle production from p + p collisions that are known as transverse single spin asymmetries,
A N a , b , c ϕ a / A ( 3 ) ( x 1 , x 2 , s ) ϕ b / B ( x ) σ ^ D c C ( z ) + a , b , c δ q a / A ( x , s ) ϕ b / B ( 3 ) ( x 1 , x 2 ) σ ^ D c C ( z ) + a , b , c δ q a / A ( x , s ) ϕ b / B ( x ) σ ^ D c C ( 3 ) ( z 1 , z 2 ) ,
where Superscript (3) terms represent the twist-3 correlators and all other terms are at the leading twist-2. From Equation (2), the asymmetry can originate from an initial-state “Sivers-like” twist-3 correlator, ϕ ( 3 ) , coupled with a leading-twist fragmentation function, D, or a final-state “Collins-like” correlator, D ( 3 ) , coupled with a leading-twist transversity distribution, δ q . The twist-3 functions can be related to the k T moments of the TMD PDFs and FFs. Observables at PHENIX are chosen for their sensitivity to specific twist-3 correlators and, by extension, specific TMDs. As an example, the direct photon A N provides a considerably powerful constraint on the twist-3 quark–gluon and trigluon correlators because the clean final state minimizes any twist-3 contribution from fragmentation.

2. Experiment

The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) provides the spin physics community with the unique opportunity to study spin observables from high-energy polarized proton collisions. The collection of polarized physics runs at RHIC relevant for PHENIX data taking are outlined in Table 1.
Located at the 8 o’clock interaction point on the RHIC ring, the PHENIX detector, shown in Figure 1, was built for the high-resolution measurement of hadrons, photons, electrons, and muons. Two central arms, each with ϕ = π / 2 azimuthal and | η | < 0.35 pseudorapidity coverage, were outfitted with high granularity electromagnetic calorimeters, drift and pad chambers for track reconstruction, a Ring-Imaging Cherenkov Detector for e/ π discrimination, and a silicon vertex detector for primary and secondary vertex reconstruction. Muon arms with full azimuthal coverage at intermediate pseudorapidity, 1.2   <   | η |   <   2.4 , measured charged particle momentum and provided muon and charged hadron identification. At forward rapidity, the Muon Piston Calorimeters were full azimuth electromagnetic calorimeters from 3.1   <   | η |   <   3.8 , and the beam–beam counter was a global event characterization detector responsible for luminosity counting and providing a minimum bias trigger. Upstream of the interaction region in the RHIC tunnel, the zero-degree calorimeters provided hadronic calorimetry intended for far-forward neutron detection at | η |   >   6.8 . A thorough description of the PHENIX detector and its capabilities can be found in the detector overview [32].

3. Results

3.1. Longitudinal Spin

At RHIC energies, hard scattering occurs mostly through quark–gluon and gluon–gluon interactions. As such, PHENIX observables from longitudinally polarized proton collisions provide unparalleled access to the gluon helicity distribution through measurements of their longitudinal double spin asymmetries,
A L L = σ + + σ + σ + + + σ + σ σ .
Here, σ + + σ + denotes the cross-section from collisions of protons with like (opposite) helicities and σ σ is the helicity (unpolarized) cross-section. The helicity cross-section is the convolution of the partonic helicity distributions with the partonic cross-section,
σ = f a / A f b / B σ a b ,
for partons a , b and hadrons A , B , where we neglected any fragmentation effects. In most cases at RHIC, at least one of the parton helicity distributions is g ( x ) .

3.1.1. Direct Photon A L L

The cleanest measurement of the gluon helicity is the longitudinal double spin asymmetry of direct photons. The production of direct photons comes predominantly from quark–gluon Compton scattering, leading to minimal contributions from fragmentation in the final state. Additionally, the A L L from direct photons has a linear dependence in g ( x ) and is therefore sensitive to its sign.
This is particularly relevant considering the recent study [33] that found consistent positive and negative solutions for the gluon helicity after relaxing a positivity constraint. A response paper [34] argues that the relaxing of such a constraint leads to unphysical predictions. The direct photon A L L can serve as an experimental arbiter to this question. In Run 13, PHENIX measured the direct photon A L L at s = 510 GeV, the first measurement of its kind [35]. Figure 2 shows the direct photon A L L , which favors the positive solution of g at 2.8 σ .

3.1.2. Pion A L L

While the first evidence of nonzero gluon polarization was discovered at high x, the low-x behavior of the gluon helicity is still largely unconstrained due to a lack of experimental data. In order to probe the x < 0.05 region of g ( x ) , PHENIX measured the π ± A L L at the increased center of mass energy of s = 510 GeV [38] to go along with a previous measurement from s = 200 GeV [39]. This improved the downward reach in x T by about a factor of two (Figure 3).

3.1.3. W Boson A L

In addition to helping set constraints on the gluon polarization in the proton, PHENIX investigated the helicity of sea quarks through the measurement of the longitudinal single spin asymmetry of the W boson. The maximally parity-violating electroweak process u L d ¯ R W + , u ¯ R d L W fixes the handedness of the quarks and antiquarks such that reversing the polarization direction of the proton flips the corresponding helicities of the quarks. The longitudinal single spin asymmetry is thus proportional to a mixture of the helicities and unpolarized PDFs of the quarks and anti-quarks,
A L W = σ + σ σ + + σ u ¯ ( x 1 ) d ( x 2 ) d ( x 1 ) u ¯ ( x 2 ) u ¯ ( x 1 ) d ( x 2 ) + d ( x 1 ) u ¯ ( x 2 )
W ± are detected through their leptonic decay modes such that the charge and kinematics of the decay lepton allow for the flavor separation of the sea quarks. This means that this measurement is sensitive to the polarized sea quark asymmetry u ¯ d ¯ . Results of the W boson A L from PHENIX [40,41] and STAR [42] are shown in Figure 4, hinting at a positive polarized sea asymmetry. An additional high-precision W A L from STAR [43] was included in an update to the NNPDFpol1.1 global fit [16], which indicated for the first time the clear positive signature of the asymmetry.

3.2. Transverse Spin

In transversely polarized p + p collisions, particle production is to first-order azimuthally dependent on a cosine modulation. The magnitude of this modulation is the same transverse single spin asymmetry A N of Equation (2), and it is measured experimentally by
A N cos ϕ = 1 P d σ ( ϕ ) d σ ( ϕ ) d σ ( ϕ ) + d σ ( ϕ ) ,
where P is the beam polarization and d σ , ( ϕ ) are the cross-sections differential in the azimuth for polarized up and polarized down protons, respectively. The goal of the transverse spin physics program at PHENIX is to measure A N across an array of different final-state particles, which are each uniquely suited to provide constraints on some subset of the twist-3 correlators.

3.2.1. Direct Photon A N

As stated in Section 1, direct photon observables mitigate any final-state color effects, leaving the direct photon A N directly sensitive to quark–gluon and trigluon correlators in the initial state only. A recent PHENIX measurement of the midrapidity direct photon A N at s = 200 GeV [44] is shown in Figure 5 with a comparison to theoretical predictions of the contributions to the asymmetry from the quark–gluon [45] and trigluon correlators [46]. The measurement is consistent with both the model predictions and zero asymmetry but with a 50-time statistical improvement from the previous best measurement at Fermilab E704 [47].

3.2.2. Open Heavy Flavor A N

PHENIX also measured the midrapidity open heavy flavor A N at s = 200 GeV [48], shown in Figure 6. The open heavy flavor A N isolates the twist-3 initial-state trigluon correlators because (a) the process is dominated by gluon–gluon fusion and (b) gluons have no transversity within the spin 1/2 proton, hence eliminating any twist-3 effects from the final state. Not much is known of the trigluon functions, so a typical phenomenological strategy is to parameterize them in relation to the much better understood unpolarized gluon PDF [46,49]. Scanning through the parameter space and comparing the predictions to the experimental results enabled this measurement to place the first experimental constraints on these parameters: λ f , λ d , K G , K G .

3.2.3. Forward Charged Hadron and η Meson A N

At forward rapidities, PHENIX recently observed large transverse single spin asymmetries at high Feynman-x ( x F ) in charged hadron [50] and preliminary η meson results (Figure 7).
These measurements agree with previous findings and have a broader kinematic reach to higher x F . Forward production of hadrons is dominated by valence quark interactions, suggesting that a significant contribution to the asymmetries must originate from twist-3 quark–gluon correlators in either the initial state, final state, or both. Recent phenomenological studies [51,52] appear to indicate that, at least in the light meson sector, the initial-state twist-3 quark–gluon correlator by itself is insufficient to describe the size of the observed asymmetries and a consistent description between asymmetries in SIDIS and proton–proton collisions relies predominantly on twist-3 fragmentation.

3.2.4. Forward Charged Hadron A N in p + A

The forward charged hadron transverse single spin asymmetries were also measured in p + A l and p + A u [53]. When compared with p + p , PHENIX observed striking behavior suggesting a nuclear modification of A N , which looks like A 1 / 3 , as shown in Figure 8 (left). A follow-up study measured A N differentially in x F with a much larger dataset and confirmed the suppression of the asymmetry as a function of mass number [50].
The proper theoretical description of this behavior is still elusive. Some calculations of A N in p + A that account for gluon saturation effects find that such behavior is possible when in the saturation regime, but the PHENIX measurement is well above the saturation scale in the A u nucleus, violating the condition needed for strong nuclear suppression [55]. Multiple scattering between the struck quark and nucleons has been suggested as a mechanism to suppress the azimuthal asymmetries in SIDIS [56]. This argument has yet to be extended theoretically to hadronic collisions, but it may warrant further investigation as the experimental observation of suppression of A N with respect to the average number of nucleon–nucleon collisions shown in Figure 8 (right) suggests dependence of A N on the density of the nuclear matter, a variable closely connected to the likelihood of multiple scatters.

3.2.5. Far-Forward Neutron A N

At far-forward rapidities in PHENIX, the measurement of the nontrivial nuclear dependence of the neutron transverse single spin asymmetry [57] shown in Figure 9 has been the subject of considerable study. In this region, the mechanisms for producing particles are dominated by soft QCD processes, like one-pion exchange and diffractive scattering. While forward neutron yields have been well described using one-pion exchange models, the large negative neutron A N in p + p collisions require a more subtle explanation of interference between the neutron production amplitudes from one-pion exchange and Reggeon exchange [58]. This mechanism, however, could not explain the large dependence and sign change of the asymmetry on the mass number in p + A collisions.
The explanation for this initially unexpected behavior is that electromagnetic interactions from ultra-peripheral collisions (UPCs) generate large positive asymmetries that are highly dependent on the mass number [59]. This is reflected in Figure 9 where the ZDC⊗BBC-veto trigger requirement enhances the UPC contribution to A N while the ZDC⊗BBC-tag trigger requirement enhances the hadronic contribution. More recently, the very forward neutron asymmetries have been measured as a function of p T and x F with these separate trigger conditions [60]. Model calculations that include contributions from one-pion exchange and UPC qualitatively describe the behavior reasonably well, as seen in Figure 10 and Figure 11.

4. Conclusions

The PHENIX spin physics group has made a suite of recent measurements that explore the role of spin in QCD and nuclear physics. Measurements of longitudinal spin asymmetries offer evidence of nonzero gluon polarization and a positive polarized sea quark asymmetry. Measurements of transverse spin asymmetries in p + p collisions constrain a wide variety of twist-3 multiparton correlators. In p + A collisions, transverse spin asymmetries motivate new questions about the effects of nuclear matter in spin physics. As the PHENIX program winds down, the final spin analyses are underway. We will further explore the low-x behavior of the gluon helicity with forward measurements of longitudinal double spin asymmetries at s = 510 GeV.

Funding

We acknowledge support from the Office of Nuclear Physics in the Office of Science of the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, Abilene Christian University Research Council, Research Foundation of SUNY, and Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University (USA), Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Japan), Natural Science Foundation of China (People’s Republic of China), Croatian Science Foundation and Ministry of Science and Education (Croatia), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (Czech Republic), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Commissariat ‘a l’Energie Atomique, and Institut’ National de Physique Nucl’eaire et de Physique des Particules (France), J. Bolyai Research Scholarship, EFOP, the New National Excellence Program (UNKP), NKFIH’, and OTKA (Hungary), Department of Atomic Energy and Department of Science and Technology (India), Israel Science Foundation (Israel), Basic Science Research and SRC (CENuM) Programs through NRF funded by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and ICT (Korea). Ministry of Education and Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Agency of Atomic Energy (Russia), VR and Wallenberg Foundation (Sweden), University of Zambia, the Government of the Republic of Zambia (Zambia), the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union, the Hungarian American Enterprise Scholarship Fund, the US-Hungarian Fulbright Foundation, and the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation.

Data Availability Statement

The data from recent PHENIX measurements are available in HEPdata: https://www.hepdata.net/search/?collaboration=PHENIX (accessed on 7 February 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jaffe, R.; Manohar, A. The g1 problem: Deep inelastic electron scattering and the spin of the proton. Nucl. Phys. B 1990, 337, 509–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adeva, B.; Akdogan, T.; Arik, E.; Arvidson, A.; Badelek, B.; Bardin, G.; Baum, G.; Berglund, P.; Betev, L.; Bird, I.G.; et al. Spin asymmetries A1 and structure functions g1 of the proton and the deuteron from polarized high energy muon scattering. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 58, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abe, K.; Akagi, T.; Anthony, P.L.; Antonov, R.; Arnold, R.G.; Averett, T.; Band, H.R.; Bauer, J.M.; Borel, H.; Bosted, P.E.; et al. Measurements of the proton and deuteron spin structure functions g1 and g2. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 58, 112003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Airapetian, A.; Akopov, N.; Akopov, Z.; Andrus, A.; Aschenauer, E.C.; Augustyniak, W.; Avakian, R.; Avetissian, A.; Avetissian, E.; Belostotski, S.; et al. Precise determination of the spin structure function g1 of the proton, deuteron, and neutron. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prok, Y.; Bosted, P.; Kvaltine, N.; Adhikari, K.P.; Adikaram, D.; Aghasyan, M.; Amaryan, M.J.; Anderson, M.D.; Anefalos Pereira, S.; Avakian, H.; et al. Precision measurements of g1 of the proton and of the deuteron with 6 GeV electrons. Phys. Rev. C 2014, 90, 025212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adolph, C.; Akhunzyanov, R.; Alexeev, M.; Alexeev, G.; Amoroso, A.; Andrieux, V.; Anosov, V.; Austregesilo, A.; Azevedo, C.; Badełek, B.; et al. The spin structure function g1p of the proton and a test of the Bjorken sum rule. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 753, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alekseev, M.; Alexakhin, V.; Alexandrov, Y.; Alexeev, G.; Amoroso, A.; Austregesilo, A.; Badełek, B.; Balestra, F.; Barth, J.; Baum, G.; et al. Quark helicity distributions from longitudinal spin asymmetries in muon–proton and muon–deuteron scattering. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 693, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Airapetian, A.; Akopov, N.; Akopov, Z.; Aschenauer, E.C.; Augustyniak, W.; Avakian, R.; Avetissian, A.; Belostotski, S.; Blok, H.P.; Borissov, A.; et al. Longitudinal double-spin asymmetries in semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering of electrons and positrons by protons and deuterons. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 112001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adare, A.; Afanasiev, S.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Al-Bataineh, H.; Alexander, J.; Aoki, K.; Aphecetche, L.; Asai, J.; et al. Inclusive cross section and double helicity asymmetry for π0 production in p + p collisions at s = 62.4 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adare, A.; Afanasiev, S.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Al-Bataineh, H.; Alexander, J.; Aoki, K.; Aphecetche, L.; Asai, J.; et al. Gluon-Spin Contribution to the Proton Spin from the Double-Helicity Asymmetry in Inclusive π0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adare, A.; Afanasiev, S.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Al-Bataineh, H.; Alexander, J.; Aoki, K.; Aphecetche, L.; Armendariz, R.; et al. Cross section and double helicity asymmetry for η mesons and their comparison to π0 production in p+p collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 83, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abelev, B.I.; Aggarwal, M.M.; Ahammed, Z.; Anderson, B.D.; Arkhipkin, D.; Averichev, G.S.; Bai, Y.; Balewski, J.; Barannikova, O.; Barnby, L.S.; et al. Longitudinal Double-Spin Asymmetry for Inclusive Jet Production in p + p Collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 232003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Abelev, B.I.; Aggarwal, M.M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alakhverdyants, A.V.; Anderson, B.D.; Arkhipkin, D.; Averichev, G.S.; Balewski, J.; Barannikova, O.; Barnby, L.S.; et al. Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry and cross section for inclusive neutral pion production at midrapidity in polarized proton collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 111108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Adamczyk, L.; Agakishiev, G.; Aggarwal, M.M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alakhverdyants, A.V.; Alekseev, I.; Alford, J.; Anderson, B.D.; Anson, C.D.; Arkhipkin, D.; et al. Longitudinal and transverse spin asymmetries for inclusive jet production at mid-rapidity in polarized p+p collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 032006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. de Florian, D.; Sassot, R.; Stratmann, M.; Vogelsang, W. Evidence for Polarization of Gluons in the Proton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 012001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nocera, E.R.; Ball, R.D.; Forte, S.; Ridolfi, G.; Rojo, J. A first unbiased global determination of polarized PDFs and their uncertainties. Nucl. Phys. B 2014, 887, 276–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sivers, D. Single-spin production asymmetries from the hard scattering of pointlike constituents. Phys. Rev. D 1990, 41, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sivers, D. Hard-scattering scaling laws for single-spin production asymmetries. Phys. Rev. D 1991, 43, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Collins, J. Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions. Nucl. Phys. B 1993, 396, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Airapetian, A.; Akopov, N.; Akopov, Z.; Amarian, M.; Andrus, A.; Aschenauer, E.C.; Augustyniak, W.; Avakian, R.; Avetissian, A.; Avetissian, E.; et al. Single-Spin Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering on a Transversely Polarized Hydrogen Target. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 012002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alexakhin, V.Y.; Alexandrov, Y.; Alexeev, G.D.; Amoroso, A.; Badełek, B.; Balestra, F.; Ball, J.; Baum, G.; Bedfer, Y.; Berglund, P.; et al. First Measurement of the Transverse Spin Asymmetries of the Deuteron in Semi-inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 202002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alekseev, M.; Alexakhin, V.; Alexandrov, Y.; Alexeev, G.; Amoroso, A.; Arbuzov, A.; Badełek, B.; Balestra, F.; Ball, J.; Barth, J.; et al. Collins and Sivers asymmetries for pions and kaons in muon–deuteron DIS. Phys. Lett. B 2009, 673, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Airapetian, A.; Akopov, N.; Akopov, Z.; Aschenauer, E.C.; Augustyniak, W.; Avetissian, A.; Avetisyan, E.; Bacchetta, A.; Ball, B.; Bianchi, N.; et al. Observation of the Naive-T-Odd Sivers Effect in Deep-Inelastic Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 152002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ageev, E.; Alexakhin, V.; Alexandrov, Y.; Alexeev, G.; Alexeev, M.; Amoroso, A.; Badełek, B.; Balestra, F.; Ball, J.; Barth, J.; et al. A new measurement of the Collins and Sivers asymmetries on a transversely polarised deuteron target. Nucl. Phys. B 2007, 765, 31–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Airapetian, A.; Akopov, N.; Akopov, Z.; Aschenauer, E.; Augustyniak, W.; Avakian, R.; Avetissian, A.; Avetisyan, E.; Bacchetta, A.; Belostotski, S.; et al. Effects of transversity in deep-inelastic scattering by polarized protons. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 693, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adolph, C.; Aghasyan, M.; Akhunzyanov, R.; Alexeev, M.; Alexeev, G.; Amoroso, A.; Andrieux, V.; Anfimov, N.; Anosov, V.; Augsten, K.; et al. Sivers asymmetry extracted in SIDIS at the hard scales of the Drell-Yan process at COMPASS. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 770, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seidl, R.; Grosse Perdekamp, M.; Ogawa, A.; Adachi, I.; Aihara, H.; Bahinipati, S.; Bakich, A.M.; Bartel, W.; Bitenc, U.; Bondar, A.; et al. Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive production of hadron pairs in e+e annihilation at s = 10.58 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 032011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Efremov, A.; Teryaev, O. QCD asymmetry and polarized hadron structure function measurement. Phys. Lett. B 1985, 150, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qiu, J.; Sterman, G. Single transverse-spin asymmetries in hadronic pion production. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 59, 014004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ji, X. Gluon correlations in the transversely polarized nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 1992, 289, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, Z.B.; Qiu, J.W. Single transverse-spin asymmetry for D-meson production in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 034005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Adcox, K.; Adler, S.; Aizama, M.; Ajitanand, N.; Akiba, Y.; Akikawa, H.; Alexander, J.; Al-Jamel, A.; Allen, M.; Alley, G.; et al. PHENIX detector overview. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 2003, 499, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Y.; Sato, N.; Melnitchouk, W. How well do we know the gluon polarization in the proton? Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 074022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. de Florian, D.; Forte, S.; Vogelsang, W. Higgs production at RHIC and the positivity of the gluon helicity distribution. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 074007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdulameer, N.J.; Acharya, U.; Adare, A.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Akimoto, R.; Alfred, M.; Apadula, N.; Aramaki, Y.; et al. Measurement of Direct-Photon Cross Section and Double-Helicity Asymmetry at s = 510 GeV in p + p Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 251901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Florian, D.; Lucero, G.A.; Sassot, R.; Stratmann, M.; Vogelsang, W. Monte Carlo sampling variant of the DSSV14 set of helicity parton densities. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 100, 114027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cocuzza, C.; Melnitchouk, W.; Metz, A.; Sato, N. Polarized antimatter in the proton from a global QCD analysis. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, L031502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Acharya, U.; Adare, A.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Akimoto, R.; Alfred, M.; Apadula, N.; Aramaki, Y.; Asano, H.; et al. Measurement of charged pion double spin asymmetries at midrapidity in longitudinally polarized p+p collisions at s = 510 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adare, A.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Akimoto, R.; Al-Ta’ani, H.; Alexander, J.; Andrews, K.R.; Angerami, A.; Aoki, K.; et al. Charged-pion cross sections and double-helicity asymmetries in polarized p+p collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 032001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adare, A.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Akimoto, R.; Alexander, J.; Alfred, M.; Aoki, K.; Apadula, N.; Aramaki, Y.; et al. Measurement of parity-violating spin asymmetries in W± production at midrapidity in longitudinally polarized p+p collisions. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 051103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Adare, A.; Aidala, C.; Ajitanand, N.N.; Akiba, Y.; Akimoto, R.; Alexander, J.; Alfred, M.; Aoki, K.; Apadula, N.; Aramaki, Y.; et al. Cross section and longitudinal single-spin asymmetry AL for forward W±μ±ν production in polarized p+p collisions at s = 510 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2018, 98, 032007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Adamczyk, L.; Adkins, J.K.; Agakishiev, G.; Aggarwal, M.M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alekseev, I.; Alford, J.; Anson, C.D.; Aparin, A.; Arkhipkin, D.; et al. Measurement of Longitudinal Spin Asymmetries for Weak Boson Production in Polarized Proton-Proton Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 072301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Adam, J.; Adamczyk, L.; Adams, J.R.; Adkins, J.K.; Agakishiev, G.; Aggarwal, M.M.; Ahammed, Z.; Alekseev, I.; Anderson, D.M.; Aoyama, R.; et al. Measurement of the longitudinal spin asymmetries for weak boson production in proton-proton collisions at s = 51 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 051102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Acharya, U.A.; Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; Bandara, N.S.; et al. Probing Gluon Spin-Momentum Correlations in Transversely Polarized Protons through Midrapidity Isolated Direct Photons in p+p Collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 127, 162001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kanazawa, K.; Koike, Y.; Metz, A.; Pitonyak, D. Transverse single-spin asymmetries in ppγX from quark-gluon-quark correlations in the proton. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 014013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koike, Y.; Yoshida, S. Probing the three-gluon correlation functions by the single spin asymmetry in ppDX. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 014026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Adams, D.L.; Achurin, N.; Belikov, N.I.; Bravar, A.; Bystricky, J.; Corcoran, M.D.; Cossairt, J.D.; Cranshaw, J.; Derevschikov, A.A.; En’yo, H.; et al. Measurement of single spin asymmetry for direct photon production in pp collisions at 200-GeV/c. Phys. Lett. B 1995, 345, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abdulameer, N.J.; Acharya, U.; Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; et al. Improving constraints on gluon spin-momentum correlations in transversely polarized protons via midrapidity open-heavy-flavor electrons in p+p collisions at s = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 052012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kang, Z.B.; Qiu, J.W.; Vogelsang, W.; Yuan, F. Accessing trigluon correlations in the nucleon via the single spin asymmetry in open charm production. Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 114013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdulameer, N.J.; Acharya, U.; Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; et al. Transverse single-spin asymmetry of charged hadrons at forward and backward rapidity in polarized p+p, p+Al, and p+Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 072016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kanazawa, K.; Koike, Y.; Metz, A.; Pitonyak, D. Towards an explanation of transverse single-spin asymmetries in proton-proton collisions: The role of fragmentation in collinear factorization. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 111501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gamberg, L.; Malda, M.; Miller, J.A.; Pitonyak, D.; Prokudin, A.; Sato, N. Updated QCD global analysis of single transverse-spin asymmetries: Extracting H ~ , and the role of the Soffer bound and lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 034014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; Bandara, N.S.; Barish, K.N.; et al. Nuclear Dependence of the Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry in the Production of Charged Hadrons at Forward Rapidity in Polarized p + p, p + Al, and p + Au Collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 122001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miller, M.L.; Reygers, K.; Sanders, S.J.; Steinberg, P. Glauber Modeling in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2007, 57, 205–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Benić, S.; Hatta, Y. Single spin asymmetry in forward pA collisions: Phenomenology at RHIC. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 094012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gao, J.H.; Liang, Z.T.; Wang, X.N. Nuclear dependence of azimuthal asymmetry in semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. C 2010, 81, 065211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Aoki, K.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Ayuso, C.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; et al. Nuclear Dependence of the Transverse-Single-Spin Asymmetry for Forward Neutron Production in Polarized p + A Collisions at s N N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kopeliovich, B.Z.; Potashnikova, I.K.; Schmidt, I.; Soffer, J. Single transverse spin asymmetry of forward neutrons. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 114012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mitsuka, G. Recently measured large AN for forward neutrons in pA collisions at s N N = 200 GeV explained through simulations of ultraperipheral collisions and hadronic interactions. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 95, 044908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Acharya, U.A.; Aidala, C.; Akiba, Y.; Alfred, M.; Andrieux, V.; Apadula, N.; Asano, H.; Azmoun, B.; Babintsev, V.; Bandara, N.S.; et al. Transverse single spin asymmetries of forward neutrons in p + p, p + Al, and p + Au collisions at s N N = 200 GeV as a function of transverse and longitudinal momenta. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 032004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (Left): The PHENIX detector from the point of view of the beam. (Right): A cross-sectional view of the PHENIX detector when viewed from the side.
Figure 1. (Left): The PHENIX detector from the point of view of the beam. (Right): A cross-sectional view of the PHENIX detector when viewed from the side.
Particles 08 00014 g001
Figure 2. The direct photon longitudinal double spin asymmetry [35] compared to phenomenological predictions from DSSV [36] and JAM [37] where JAM considers the possiblity of either g > 0 or g < 0 .
Figure 2. The direct photon longitudinal double spin asymmetry [35] compared to phenomenological predictions from DSSV [36] and JAM [37] where JAM considers the possiblity of either g > 0 or g < 0 .
Particles 08 00014 g002
Figure 3. (Left): The p T dependent A L L for pions at s = 510 GeV [38] compared to predictions made using the global DSSV helicity fits [15]. (Right): The x T dependent A L L for pions at s = 510 GeV [38] and s = 200 GeV [39].
Figure 3. (Left): The p T dependent A L L for pions at s = 510 GeV [38] compared to predictions made using the global DSSV helicity fits [15]. (Right): The x T dependent A L L for pions at s = 510 GeV [38] and s = 200 GeV [39].
Particles 08 00014 g003
Figure 4. The PHENIX [40,41] and STAR [42] longitudinal single spin asymmetries for (a) W + bosons and (b) W bosons.
Figure 4. The PHENIX [40,41] and STAR [42] longitudinal single spin asymmetries for (a) W + bosons and (b) W bosons.
Particles 08 00014 g004
Figure 5. The direct photon transverse single spin asymmetry from PHENIX [44] plotted alongside model predictions of the A N generated by quark–gluon and trigluon correlators.
Figure 5. The direct photon transverse single spin asymmetry from PHENIX [44] plotted alongside model predictions of the A N generated by quark–gluon and trigluon correlators.
Particles 08 00014 g005
Figure 6. The open heavy flavor e ± transverse single spin asymmetry from PHENIX [48] compared with theoretical predictions from the trigluon correlators using the best-fit parameters determined by the measurement.
Figure 6. The open heavy flavor e ± transverse single spin asymmetry from PHENIX [48] compared with theoretical predictions from the trigluon correlators using the best-fit parameters determined by the measurement.
Particles 08 00014 g006
Figure 7. (Left): The forward ( 1.4 < | η | < 2.4 ) charged hadron transverse single spin asymmetries at PHENIX [50]. (Right): The preliminary forward ( η = 3.49 ) transverse single spin asymmetry of the η meson at PHENIX.
Figure 7. (Left): The forward ( 1.4 < | η | < 2.4 ) charged hadron transverse single spin asymmetries at PHENIX [50]. (Right): The preliminary forward ( η = 3.49 ) transverse single spin asymmetry of the η meson at PHENIX.
Particles 08 00014 g007
Figure 8. The forward charged hadron transverse single spin asymmetry observed in p + p , p + A l , p + A u [53] at PHENIX. (Left): (a) The A N as a function of mass number A 1 / 3 . (b) The best-fit of the exponent, α where A N ( A 1 / 3 ) α . (Right): (c) The A N as a function of the number of average nucleon–nucleon collisions, N coll Avg calculated using the Glauber model [54]. (d) The best-fit of the exponent, β , where A N ( N coll Avg ) β .
Figure 8. The forward charged hadron transverse single spin asymmetry observed in p + p , p + A l , p + A u [53] at PHENIX. (Left): (a) The A N as a function of mass number A 1 / 3 . (b) The best-fit of the exponent, α where A N ( A 1 / 3 ) α . (Right): (c) The A N as a function of the number of average nucleon–nucleon collisions, N coll Avg calculated using the Glauber model [54]. (d) The best-fit of the exponent, β , where A N ( N coll Avg ) β .
Particles 08 00014 g008
Figure 9. The far-forward neutron transverse single spin asymmetry at PHENIX for p + p , p + A l , p + A u collisions [57]. The red circles represent inclusive neutrons, the green squares represent a neutron sample with enhanced hadronic contributions, and the blue triangles represent a neutron sample with enhanced electromagnetic (UPC) contributions.
Figure 9. The far-forward neutron transverse single spin asymmetry at PHENIX for p + p , p + A l , p + A u collisions [57]. The red circles represent inclusive neutrons, the green squares represent a neutron sample with enhanced hadronic contributions, and the blue triangles represent a neutron sample with enhanced electromagnetic (UPC) contributions.
Particles 08 00014 g009
Figure 10. The p T -dependent A N of far-forward neutrons for p + p (blue), p + A l (green), p + A u (red) collision systems after enhancing hadronic contributions with the BBC tag trigger condition. Comparisons to model calculations that account for contributions from one-pion exchange [58] and UPC [59] are shown at (a) 0.40 < x F < 0.55 (b) 0.55 < x F < 0.70 (c) 0.70 < x F < 0.85 (d) 0.85 < x F < 1.00 .
Figure 10. The p T -dependent A N of far-forward neutrons for p + p (blue), p + A l (green), p + A u (red) collision systems after enhancing hadronic contributions with the BBC tag trigger condition. Comparisons to model calculations that account for contributions from one-pion exchange [58] and UPC [59] are shown at (a) 0.40 < x F < 0.55 (b) 0.55 < x F < 0.70 (c) 0.70 < x F < 0.85 (d) 0.85 < x F < 1.00 .
Particles 08 00014 g010
Figure 11. The p T -dependent A N of far-forward neutrons for p + p (blue), p + A l (green), p + A u (red) collision systems after enhancing electromagnetic UPC contributions with the BBC veto trigger condition. Comparisons to model calculations that account for contributions from one-pion exchange [58] and UPC [59] are shown at (a) 0.40 < x F < 0.55 (b) 0.55 < x F < 0.70 (c) 0.70 < x F < 0.85 (d) 0.85 < x F < 1.00 .
Figure 11. The p T -dependent A N of far-forward neutrons for p + p (blue), p + A l (green), p + A u (red) collision systems after enhancing electromagnetic UPC contributions with the BBC veto trigger condition. Comparisons to model calculations that account for contributions from one-pion exchange [58] and UPC [59] are shown at (a) 0.40 < x F < 0.55 (b) 0.55 < x F < 0.70 (c) 0.70 < x F < 0.85 (d) 0.85 < x F < 1.00 .
Particles 08 00014 g011
Table 1. PHENIX polarized physics data taking runs.
Table 1. PHENIX polarized physics data taking runs.
YearSystem s ( GeV ) PolarizationRecorded
DirectionLuminosity [ pb 1 ]
2006p + ptransverse0.02
62.4longitudinal0.08
200transverse2.7
longitudinal7.5
2008p + p200transverse5.2
2009p + p200longitudinal16
50014
2011p + p500longitudinal18
2012p + p200transverse9.7
510longitudinal32
2013p + p510longitudinal155
p + p200transverse60
2015p + Au1.27
p + Al3.97
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Loomis, D., on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration. Spin Physics at PHENIX. Particles 2025, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010014

AMA Style

Loomis D on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration. Spin Physics at PHENIX. Particles. 2025; 8(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Loomis, Devon on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration. 2025. "Spin Physics at PHENIX" Particles 8, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010014

APA Style

Loomis, D., on behalf of the PHENIX Collaboration. (2025). Spin Physics at PHENIX. Particles, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles8010014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop