Next Article in Journal
Co-Simulation-Based Verification of Torsional Vibration Protection of Electric-Driven Railway Vehicle Wheelsets
Previous Article in Journal
Vibration Analysis of a 5-DOF Long-Reach Robotic Arm
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

On the Efficiency Enhancement of an Actively Tunable MEMS Energy Harvesting Device

Vibration 2022, 5(3), 603-612; https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration5030035
by Mortaza Aliasghary 1, Saber Azizi 2,3, Hadi Madinei 3 and Hamed Haddad Khodaparast 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Vibration 2022, 5(3), 603-612; https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration5030035
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors propose an active control method to adjust the resonance frequency of a capacitive energy harvester.

The presented work needs a major revision before being considered to be published in MPDI Vibration.

More detailed comments are as follows.

 

1.     Authors should make a strong argument for the novelty of their work and the depth of their analysis. Generally, the paper lacks a strong and in-depth theoretical analysis.

2.     The introduction is not showing the related work in the literature. The authors are advised to revise the introduction by analyzing more relevant work and showing the proposed harvester's real application.

3.     The used voltage is in the order of 3kV. What is the real application of such a big applied voltage? Also, using the nondimensional Voltage V_N, what is the value of the pull-in voltage, and how did you calculate it?

4.     Going from Fig.3 to Fig.4, the transition from nonlinear softening to dynamic pull-in (or escape region) is not clear. What it is the applied voltages in this case? Another analysis is needed to understand what is happening. I suggest that authors use other numerical techniques, e.g., shouting. This escape could be only due to the divergence of numerical integration. More evidence is needed to prove the findings.

5.             The numerical analysis is not in-depth, and the authors should emphasize the analysis of the results.

Author Response

Please see the attached file. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I have attached file to this email.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors address most of my questions.

However it is not clear again the transition to pull-in instability band. What it is the applied V_N in Figure 4? It is quite important to give this value to more follow the transition from Figure 3 to Figure 4. 

Author Response

Please see the file attached. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have correctly made all the required changes.

Author Response

English language and style are modified. 

Back to TopTop