# Experimental Identification of Backbone Curves of Strongly Nonlinear Systems by Using Response-Controlled Stepped-Sine Testing (RCT)

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Experimental Modal Analysis with RCT and HFS

## 3. Numerical Validation

#### 3.1. Determination of Backbone Curves by Using Constant-Force Simulations

#### 3.2. Determination of Backbone Curves by Using RCT with HFS

## 4. Experimental Applications

#### 4.1. T-Beam

#### 4.2. Control Fin Actuation Mechanism

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Carney, K.; Yunis, I.; Smith, K.; Peng, C.Y. Nonlinear dynamic behavior in the Cassini spacecraft modal survey. In Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Orlando, FL, USA, 3–6 February 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Ahlquist, J.R.; Carreño, J.M.; Climent, H.; de Diego, R.; de Alba, J. Assessment of nonlinear structural response in A400M GVT. In Proceedings of the 28th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Jacksonville, FL, USA, 1–4 February 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Noël, J.P.; Renson, L.; Kerschen, G. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear aerospace structure: Experimental identification and modal interactions. J. Sound Vib.
**2014**, 333, 2588–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kerschen, G.; Worden, K.; Vakakis, A.F.; Golinval, J.C. Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2006**, 20, 505–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Noël, J.P.; Kerschen, G. Nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics: 10 more years of progress. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2017**, 83, 2–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Adams, D.E.; Allemang, R.J. Survey of nonlinear detection and identification techniques for experimental vibrations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium, 16–18 September 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Setio, S.; Setio, H.D.; Jezequel, L.A. method of nonlinear modal identification from frequency response tests. J. Sound Vib.
**1992**, 158, 497–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gibert, C. Fitting measured frequency responses using nonlinear modes. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2003**, 17, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Szemplinska-Stupnicka, W. The modified single mode method in the investigation of the resonant vibration of nonlinear systems. J. Sound Vib.
**1979**, 63, 475–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Göge, D.; Füllekrug, U.; Sinapius, M.; Link, M.; Gaul, L. Advanced test strategy for identification and characterization of nonlinearities of aerospace structures. AIAA J.
**2005**, 43, 974–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Platten, M.F.; Wright, J.R.; Dimitriadis, G.; Cooper, J.E. Identification of multi-degree of freedom nonlinear systems using an extended modal space model. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2009**, 23, 8–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Londono, J.M.; Neild, S.A.; Cooper, J.E. Identification of backbone curves of nonlinear systems from resonance decay responses. J. Sound Vib.
**2015**, 348, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Peeters, M.; Kerschen, G.; Golinval, J.C. Dynamic testing of nonlinear vibrating structures using nonlinear normal modes. J. Sound Vib.
**2011**, 330, 486–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Peter, S.; Leine, R.I. Excitation power quantities in phase resonance testing of nonlinear systems with phase-locked-loop excitation. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2017**, 96, 139–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Renson, L.; Gonzalez-Buelga, A.; Barton, D.A.W.; Neild, S.A. Robust identification of backbone curves using control-based continuation. J. Sound Vib.
**2016**, 367, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Karaağaçlı, T.; Özgüven, H.N. Experimental modal analysis of nonlinear systems by using response-controlled stepped-sine testing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2021**, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tanrıkulu, Ö.; Kuran, B.; Özgüven, H.N.; Imregün, M. Forced harmonic response analysis of nonlinear structures using describing functions. AIAA J.
**1993**, 31, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] - Peter, S.; Scheel, M.; Krack, M.; Leine, R.I. Synthesis of nonlinear frequency responses with experimentally extracted nonlinear modes. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2018**, 101, 498–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ferreira, J.V.; Ewins, D.J. Algebraic nonlinear impedance equation using multi-harmonic describing function. In Proceedings of the 15th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Orlando, FL, USA, 3–6 February 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Arslan, Ö.; Aykan, M.; Özgüven, H.N. Parametric identification of structural nonlinearities from measured frequency response data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2011**, 25, 1112–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karaağaçlı, T.; Özgüven, H.N. A frequency domain nonparametric identification method for nonlinear structures: Describing surface method. Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
**2020**, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shin, W.H.; Lee, I. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis for a control fin with actuator. J. Aircraft
**2007**, 44, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ning, Y.; Nan, W.; Xin, Z.; Wei, L. Nonlinear flutter wind tunnel test and numerical analysis of folding fins with freeplay nonlinearities. Chin. J. Aeronaut.
**2016**, 29, 144–159. [Google Scholar] - Muller, F.; Abeloos, G.; Ferhatoglu, E.; Scheel, M.; Brake, M.R.W.; Tiso, P.; Renson, L.; Krack, M. Comparison between control-based continuation and phase-locked loop methods for the identification of backbone curves & nonlinear frequency responses. In Proceedings of the 38th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Houston, TX, USA, 10–13 February 2020. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Frequency response curves measured in constant-force stepped-sine testing compared to the ones measured by RCT with HFS: (

**a**) jump phenomenon; (

**b**) premature jump.

**Figure 3.**The 5 DOF system with cubic stiffness nonlinearity [16].

**Figure 4.**Determination of the backbone curves (blue square markers) of the 5 DOF system corresponding to the 1st and 5th DOFs by using constant-force stepped-sine simulations. (

**a**) The backbone curve of the 1st DOF; (

**b**) the backbone curve of the 5th DOF.

**Figure 5.**Construction of the HFS corresponding to the 1st DOF by combining harmonic force spectra with linear interpolation. (

**a**) Harmonic excitation force spectra; (

**b**) HFS of the 1st DOF [16].

**Figure 6.**(

**a**) HFS of the 1st DOF cut with constant force planes; (

**b**) extraction of constant-force frequency response curves (black—ranging from 10 N to 50 N with 5N increments) and identification of the backbone curve (red) of the 1st DOF from HFS.

**Figure 7.**(

**a**) HFS of the 5th DOF cut with constant force planes; (

**b**) extraction of the constant-force frequency response curves (black—ranging from 10 N to 50 N with 5 N increments) and the backbone curve (red) of the 5th DOF from HFS.

**Figure 8.**Comparison of backbone curves obtained from RCT with HFS simulations with those obtained from constant force simulations: (

**a**) the backbone curve of the 1st DOF; (

**b**) the backbone curve of the 5th DOF.

**Figure 10.**(

**a**) Harmonic force spectra of the T-beam measured by RCT; (

**b**) HFS of the T-beam built up by combining harmonic force spectra with linear interpolation [16].

**Figure 11.**Validation of the frequency response curves of the T-beam extracted from HFS by using constant-force test results.

**Figure 12.**Constant-force frequency response curves (0.1 N–1.4 N) and backbone curve of the T-beam at the T-junction obtained by cutting the HFS with various constant force planes.

**Figure 14.**(

**a**) Harmonic force spectra of the control fin actuation mechanism measured by RCT; (

**b**) HFS of the control fin actuation mechanism at the driving point, constructed by combining harmonic force spectra.

**Figure 15.**Comparison of the frequency response curves of the control fin actuation mechanism at the driving point, extracted from HFS with those obtained by using constant-force test results in the sweep-up direction for: (

**a**) force level F1; (

**b**) force level F2; (

**c**) force level F3.

**Figure 16.**Constant-force frequency response curves and the backbone curve of the real control fin actuation mechanism at the driving point, obtained by cutting the HFS with various constant force planes.

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Karaağaçlı, T.; Özgüven, H.N.
Experimental Identification of Backbone Curves of Strongly Nonlinear Systems by Using Response-Controlled Stepped-Sine Testing (RCT). *Vibration* **2020**, *3*, 266-280.
https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration3030019

**AMA Style**

Karaağaçlı T, Özgüven HN.
Experimental Identification of Backbone Curves of Strongly Nonlinear Systems by Using Response-Controlled Stepped-Sine Testing (RCT). *Vibration*. 2020; 3(3):266-280.
https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration3030019

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Karaağaçlı, Taylan, and H. Nevzat Özgüven.
2020. "Experimental Identification of Backbone Curves of Strongly Nonlinear Systems by Using Response-Controlled Stepped-Sine Testing (RCT)" *Vibration* 3, no. 3: 266-280.
https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration3030019