Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Emergency Response in Healthcare Facilities: Integration of Firefighting Technologies and Tactical Evacuation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Fire Size on Burning Characteristics in a Well-Confined Military Vehicle Compartment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave Chemical Looping Synergistic Gasification of Polypropylene Plastic and Water Hyacinth

1
China Energy Science and Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210023, China
2
Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 December 2024 / Revised: 4 January 2025 / Accepted: 10 January 2025 / Published: 12 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Combustion Technologies for CO2 Capture and Pollution Control)

Abstract

:
The microwave chemical looping synergistic gasification characteristics of municipal solid waste polypropylene plastic and the organic solid waste water hyacinth are experimentally investigated in this study. In addition, the characterizations of oxygen carriers before and after the reaction are combined to analyze the evolution of the microscopic morphology of oxygen carriers and the changes in the relative contents of each valence state of Fe and O elements. The results show that an increase in the water hyacinth mixing ratio presents positive effects on tar cracking and a slight negative effect on syngas yield. At the water hyacinth mixing ratio of 75%, the cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion can reach maximum values of 77.64% and 69.9%, respectively. The H2 yield and H2/CO ratio in syngas can be also improved to 0.34 Nm3/kg and 1.62, respectively. In addition, a minimum tar yield of 0.133 g/g (fuel) can be obtained at this mixing ratio. Moreover, the addition of water hyacinth has a continuous increase effect on monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (MAH) products of tar, and a continuous decrease effect on naphthalene and bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (NAH) products. This work explores the synergistic properties of organic waste plastics and agroforestry wastes during microwave chemical looping gasification, which is a useful exploration for solving the environmental problems caused by waste materials and agroforestry wastes as well as realizing the resourceful utilization of solid wastes.

1. Introduction

The development of high-efficiency thermal treatment technology that converts organic solid wastes with low-grade energy into high-grade clean energy is of great significance in meeting the major needs of carbon neutrality, mitigating environmental pollution, and realizing the resource utilization of organic solid wastes [1,2,3,4]. Gasification is an effective treatment method to convert organic solid wastes into combustible gases, such as H2, CO, and CH4. However, traditional gasification technology has low efficiency and high energy consumption and is accompanied by the generation of tar as a by-product, which poses a threat to production safety. Chemical looping gasification (CLG), as a novel type of gasification technology with important prospects, can realize the gradient utilization of chemical energy, reduce energy consumption, and improve the quality of syngas production [5,6,7,8,9,10]. In the CLG process, a kind of oxygen carrier circulates between an air reactor and a gasification reactor to gasify the fuel. The oxygen carrier can release lattice oxygen in the gasification reactor to convert biomass into combustible syngas. Meanwhile, the oxygen carrier can transfer heat from the air reactor to the gasification reactor to achieve the self-balancing of heat in the system. In addition, the metal oxides contained in the oxygen carrier itself can be used as a catalyst to promote the conversion of fuels to combustible gases and the decomposition of tars during the gasification process. Microwave chemical looping gasification technology can effectively improve the gasification rate, and its rapid and uniform heating characteristics are conducive to the heating and cracking of tar, further improving the efficiency and quality of syngas production [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Studies have shown that there are certain synergies between the gasification of two different organic solid waste materials mixed in different proportions [18,19]. Compared with organic solid waste alone gasification reaction, co-gasification of agricultural and forestry wastes and organic municipal solid wastes is a highly efficient way to realize resource utilization [20,21,22]. Agroforestry wastes are widely available and homogeneous, usually containing alkali and alkaline earth metals, which can be used as inexpensive natural catalysts to reduce the additional addition of catalysts in gasification technologies and to enhance catalytic gasification reactions, with the promise of targeted enhancement of specific products and gasification characteristics [23,24]. Yang et al. [25] investigated the interaction of high-calorific value plastics and rice straw during hybrid gasification. The results showed that synergistic effects exist when the performance of the hybrid fuel is higher than the linear sum of the fuel-weighted averages and is enhanced with higher plasticity ratios in the hybrid fuel. Zhang et al. [26] investigated the co-pyrolysis characteristics of a mixture of sludge and rice straw. They found that when the sludge content increased, the gas yield decreased significantly and the gas composition changed significantly. Torquato et al. [27] studied the mixed gasification characteristics of bagasse and sludge mixtures. The results showed that increasing bagasse content can promote the calorific value of the gas produced. Lahijani et al. [28] studied the co-gasification characteristics of palm or almond husk and tires. They observed that a 50:50 mixing ratio of palm or almond husk to tires can increase the gasification conversion 10 and 5 times, respectively, when compared to pure tire gasification. Presently, there is a lack of corresponding research on the chemical looping gasification characteristics of a variety of organic wastes heated by microwave. Since microwave heating differs from conventional heaters [29], it is necessary to explore the microwave chemical looping gasification characteristics of different wastes.
Water hyacinth is an exotic bio-invasive species due to its extremely fast growth and reproduction ability, which makes it easy for water hyacinth to escape from the planting area. Since water hyacinth itself has no natural enemies, its invasion will seriously jeopardize local aquatic organisms, aquatic plants, and aquaculture industries. As white pollution has increased in recent years, plastic waste cannot be decomposed and incineration produces toxic pollutants such as dioxins, so there is an urgent need for a way to utilize plastic waste in a cleaner way. Polypropylene (PP) plastics are a typical plastic waste, and their high hydrogen content makes them widely used in gasification research.
Therefore, this study selects PP plastic and water hyacinth as the fuels and adopts a natural iron ore as the oxygen carrier. The microwave chemical looping synergistic gasification characteristics of the municipal solid waste PP plastic and the organic solid waste water hyacinth are experimentally investigated. In addition, combined with the characterizations before and after the reaction, the synergistic mechanism for microwave chemical looping gasification is further explored. This work aims to provide a solution to the environmental problems caused by PP and agroforestry wastes while realizing the resource utilization of waste plastics and agroforestry wastes through the new microwave heating technology coupled with chemical looping technology.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials, Reagents and Equipments

2.1.1. Basic Experimental Materials

Prior to the experiment, the water hyacinth and PP plastic (Maoming Petrochemical Company, Maoming, China) were first dried in the oven at 120 °C for 24 h and then crushed for storage. The prepared fuel samples for the test are shown in Figure 1, and the elemental analysis results are shown in Table 1. The iron ore oxygen carrier mainly contained Fe2O3 (54.49%), SiO2 (27.31%), Al2O3 (3.69%), CaO (3.43%) and MgO (2.65%). It was crushed first and then calcined at a high temperature of 1000 °C in a muffle furnace for 6 h.

2.1.2. Major Experimental Reagents

High-purity nitrogen (≥99.99%), isopropanol (AR), anhydrous calcium chloride (AR), color-changing silicone (L), and deionized water (self-prepared) were used.

2.1.3. Major Experimental Equipment

The experiment used the following: gas mass flowmeters (range: 0–2000 mL/min), a gas analyzer (CH4: 0–50%, H2: 0–50%, CO: 0–50%, CO2: 0–50%, O2: 0–25%), a steam generator (temperature rise range: 0–400 °C), an electronic balance (range: 0–200 g, accurate: 0.001 g), a crusher (crushing range: 70–300 mesh), a water pump (head: 3 m), and a microwave reactor (frequency: 2.45 GHz, power range: 0–1000 W).

2.2. Experimental Device and Process

The fixed bed experimental device for microwave chemical looping gasification mainly consists of a microwave reactor, feed system, gas treatment system, online analysis system, and tar collection system (as shown in Scheme 1). The detailed description of the reactor system can be found elsewhere [30].
Before each test, a porous stainless steel air distribution plate is placed in the middle of the quartz tube to carry the material. The bed material structure in the experiment is a three-layer structure, which is divided into silicon carbide (SiC) bottom layer, iron ore oxygen carrier, fuel, SiC intermediate mixed layer, and SiC top layer. The bed temperature is measured by a type K thermocouple and controlled by a proportion integral differential (PID) program. N2 is introduced into the system to purge the piping system for 5 min after loading the material, in order to ensure that there is no residual reactive gas. Afterwards, the N2 flow rate is set to 600 mL/min, and the reaction target temperature and microwave heating power are set in the microwave reactor. Finally, the pinhole injection pump and microwave reactor are started for reaction. In the process of the experiment, microwave chemical looping synergistic gasification will be maintained for 30 min. The syngas generated during the test is successively passed through the tar collection system, the washing cylinders (isopropyl alcohol, water, calcium chloride) in the ice bath water cooling unit, and finally the multi-component gas analyzer.
The collected tar is heated and stirred with a magnetic stirrer so that the volume of the solution is reduced to less than 50 mL. The solution is shaken in an ultrasonic oscillator for 30 min and then left to stand for 30 min. The upper layer of the liquid is absorbed with a pinhole syringe and then filtered through a 0.2 μm PTFE filter tip into a chromatographic volume bottle, which is then scanned with a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) device.

2.3. Experimental Conditions

The experiments are carried out under the conditions of 900 °C for the reaction temperature and 3.49 for the mass ratio of oxygen carrier to fuel. The mixing ratios of water hyacinth and PP plastic are set as 0:100%, 25%:75%, 50%:50%, and 75%:25%, which are labeled 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75, respectively.

2.4. Data Processing

The total gas yield and each single gas component yield are calculated by Equations (1) and (2). The relative portion of a single gas component in the syngas and the lower heating value of syngas can be further obtained, as shown in Equations (3) and (4):
Y i = 0 t V N 2 × X i × 273 m 0 × 1 X i × 288 d t
Y g = Y i   i =   H 2 , CH 4 , CO , CO 2
P i = Y i Y g × 100 %
L H V = 0.108 P H 2 + 0.359 P C H 4 + 0.126 P C O
where Yi is the yield of each single gas component in the syngas and Nm3/kg fuel, and it is obtained by integrating the component change curves obtained from the analyzer; 273 and 288 represent the temperatures of 273 K and 288 K, respectively. V N 2 is the N2 flow rate at the inlet under room temperature, m3/s. Xi is the volume fraction of each single gas component measured online by the gas analyzer, %. m0 is the total mass of fuel introduced to the reactor, kg. Yg is the total gas yield, Nm3/kg fuel. Pi is the relative portion of each single gas component in the gas product, %. L H V is the lower heating value of the gas product, MJ/Nm3.
In order to reflect the gasification reaction characteristics, H2/CO ratio, CO/CO2 ratio, carbon conversion, and cold gas efficiency are often used as the gasification indicators, as shown in Equations (5)–(8):
H 2 / C O = Y H 2 Y C O
C O / C O 2 = Y C O Y C O 2
η c = 12 × m 0 × Y CO + Y C O 2 + Y C H 4 22.4 × f c × 100 %
C G E = L H V × Y g / q 0 × 100 %
where H 2 / C O is the H2/CO ratio in the gas product. C O / C O 2 is the CO/CO2 ratio in the gas product. η c is the carbon conversion, %. fc is the mass fraction of carbon in the added fuel, %. C G E is the cold gas efficiency, %. q 0 is the low calorific value of the introduced fuel, MJ/kg.

2.5. Reactions Involving Tar

Reactions involving tar are shown in Formulas (9) to (13).
Solid   fuel microwave   heating char + tar + syngas   H 2 , CO , CO 2 , CH 4 , etc .
Tar   cracking   reaction   tar coke + syngas ,   H > 0
Dehydrogenation   reaction   tar x C n H m + yH 2 ,   H > 0
Tar   reforming   reaction   tar + H 2 O CO 2 + H 2 + CO + C m H n +
Oxidation   reaction   of   tar   substances   tar + Fe 2 O 3 CO 2 + CO + H 2 + H 2 O + C m H n +

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Influence of Water Hyacinth Mixing on the Gasification Characteristics

3.1.1. Evolution of Gas–Liquid–Solid Products

The effects of the mixing of water hyacinth with PP plastic on the gas–liquid–solid three-phase mass yields are shown in Figure 2. The results show that the tar production can be effectively decreased from 0.21 to 0.13 g/g with the increase in the water hyacinth mixing ratio from 0 to 0.75. On the other hand, the syngas yield slightly decreases from 0.78 to 0.69 g/g. Moreover, the mass yield of char continues to increase from 0.01 to 0.18 g/g with the increase in mixing ratio. Due to the high volatile content and low contents of ash and fixed carbon, most of the selected PP plastic can be transformed into gas products in the early pyrolysis stage of chemical looping gasification, and thus semi-coke gasification in subsequent stages is not required. As a result, there is almost no incomplete char component in the product for the condition of pure PP plastic [31].

3.1.2. Syngas Composition Distributions

Figure 3 and Figure 4 display the effect of the water hyacinth mixing ratio on the syngas yield and composition distribution. The results show that with the increase in water hyacinth content, the total gas yield keeps decreasing from 1.05 Nm3/kg for pure PP plastic to 0.9 Nm3/kg with the mixing ratio of 0.75. This is mainly because the decrease in high-volatile PP plastic lowers the overall volatile fraction of the mixed fuel. Thus, in the early pyrolysis stage of chemical looping gasification, fewer gas products are released, which reduces the total gas yield [31]. Accordingly, the yield of CH4 is also obviously reduced from 0.41 Nm3/kg for pure PP plastic to 0.21 Nm3/kg for the mixing ratio of 0.75. However, the CO yield remains almost constant. Moreover, the H2 yield slightly increases with the increasing water hyacinth content, reaching a maximum of 0.34 Nm3/kg at the condition of 0.75 mixing ratio. This is mainly because plastics are hydrocarbon polymers formed by addition polymerization, and PP plastics are formed by adding methyl molecules (-CH3) to conventional hydrocarbon structures. Thus, in the pyrolysis stage, a large number of -CH3 free radicals are generated, which makes it easier to generate hydrocarbons including CH4. Afterward, a series of reforming reactions occur with steam, and a series of oxidation reactions occur with lattice oxygen released by the iron ore oxygen carrier, resulting in the generation of CO and CO2.

3.1.3. Gasification Characteristics

Figure 5 shows the effect of water hyacinth mixing on gasification reaction characteristics. It can be seen that with the increase in the water hyacinth mixing ratio from 0 to 0.75, the cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion are greatly promoted from 50.70% and 46.70% to 77.64% and 69.9%, respectively. This is because water hyacinth contains more organic matter, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and the microwave uniform heating characteristics lead to the same direction of heat and mass transfer in water hyacinth, which promotes the carbon conversion rate. On the other hand, the lower heating value decreases from 19.89 to 15.71 MJ/Nm3, which is mainly because of the decrease in CH4 content.
Figure 6 presents the influence of the water hyacinth mixing ratio on the ratios of H2/CO and CO/CO2. From the condition of 0 to 0.75 condition, the H2/CO ratio in syngas can be improved from 1.46 to 1.62. However, the CO/CO2 ratio in syngas gradually decreases from 2.18 to 1.67, indicating that the addition of water hyacinth leads to a certain degree of excessive oxidation of the C element to the CO2 stage, rather than the CO stage.
The water hyacinth has the characteristics of low carbon content, and hence collaborative treatment with PP plastic can effectively improve the carbon conversion, cold gas efficiency, and hydrogen–carbon ratio of syngas. On a deeper level, the alkali metal and alkaline earth metal components in biomass also promote the reaction rate of plastic waste. The formation of potassium compounds, such as KAlSiO4, Ca3Al2(SiO4)3, and K2SiO3, in the gasification process promotes the gasification rate and synergistic effect of water hyacinth and PP plastic and improves the reactivity of non-activated carbon materials [32]. In turn, PP plastics can provide more active sites for biomass gasification, and thus hydrogen transfers from polymers to biomass-derived free radicals, promoting the development of reaction products towards small-molecule alkane compounds.

3.2. Element Valence States in Oxygen Carrier

Figure 7 shows the XPS characterization results of Fe element valence states in oxygen carriers. The results show that the peak values of Fe3+ and Fe2+ in the Fe2p3/2 orbit are located at the binding energies of 712.66 eV and 710.74 eV, respectively. In the spectrums of oxygen carrier after reaction, Fe0 metal is formed, and its corresponding spectral peak binding energy is 708 eV, indicating that part of the Fe2O3 is reduced to metal Fe during the reaction process.
Table 2 lists the relative content changes of Fe element valence states and shows that in the fresh oxygen carrier, the atomic ratios of Fe3+ and Fe2+ are 51.77% and 48.23%, respectively, and Fe0 is not detected. In the condition of 0.75 for the water hyacinth mixing ratio, the atomic ratios of Fe3+, Fe2+,, and Fe0 in the oxygen carrier are 21.22%, 73.86%, and 4.92%, respectively. In the condition of 0.5 for the water hyacinth mixing ratio, the atomic ratios of Fe3+, Fe2+, and Fe0 in the oxygen carrier are 22.87%, 69.67%, and 7.46%, respectively. The results show that in the oxygen carrier after the reaction, the proportion of Fe3+ decreases significantly, while the proportions of Fe2+ and Fe0 increase, indicating that Fe2O3 has been gradually reduced to Fe3O4, FeO, and Fe.
The XPS characterization results of O element valence states in oxygen carriers are shown in Figure 8, and the relative content changes of each O element valence state are shown in Table 3. The results show that the relative contents of crystal lattice oxygen, chemisorbed oxygen and physical adsorbed oxygen atoms on the surface of fresh oxygen carrier were 29.7%, 41.76%, and 28.53%, respectively. Accordingly, the ratios of crystal lattice oxygen, chemisorbed oxygen, and physical adsorbed oxygen atoms on the surface of the oxygen carrier under the conditions of 0.75 and 0.5 for water hyacinth mixing ratio are 15.65% and 5.86%, 45.66% and 49.07%, and 38.69% and 45.07%, respectively. The results indicate that the oxygen carrier under 0.75 and 0.5 conditions can transform most of the lattice oxygen in the bulk phase into physical adsorption oxygen through oxygen vacancy for the gasification reaction.

3.3. Influence of Water Hyacinth Mixing on Tar Characteristics

3.3.1. Variation of Tar Yield Under Different Blending Ratios in Synergistic Gasification

Figure 9 shows the variation in tar yield in synergistic gasification under different blending ratios of water hyacinth. The results show that the tar yield of PP plastic single gasification is 0.211 g/g (fuel). Taking PP plastic single gasification as the basic working condition, the blending of the two fuels exhibits an obvious inhibitory effect on tar generation. When the blending ratio is 25:75 (0.25 working condition), the tar yield is 0.157 g/g (fuel), the decrease in tar yield is 0.054 g/g (fuel), and the cracking rate is 25.6%. When the blending ratio is 50:50 (0.5 working condition), the tar yield is 0.161 g/g (fuel), the decrease in tar yield is 0.050 g/g (fuel), and the cracking rate is 23.7%. When the blending ratio is 75:25 (0.75 working condition), the tar yield is 0.133 g/g (fuel), reaching the minimum value, the reduction of tar yield is 0.077 g/g (fuel), and the cracking rate is 36.5%. It can be observed that the addition of water hyacinth can bring about an obvious decrease in tar yield in the range of 20–40%. This may be because the hydrocarbons with active free radical sites from random breaks of the original polymer chains in the structure of PP plastic, interact with the hydroxyl fragments from water hyacinth, which reduces the proportion and rate of the aromatic hydrocarbon compounds’ generation [33].

3.3.2. Variation in the Contents of Tar Components Under Different Blending Ratios

Figure 10 shows the variations in the content of tar components under different water hyacinth blending ratios, and Table 4 shows the change in the contents of tar components. The main tar components are monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (MAHs), naphthalene and bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (NAHs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds (PAHs). The results show that PAHs products show a decreasing and then increasing trend with the increase in the blending ratio and reach the minimum value of 19.8% under the working condition of 0.5 for water hyacinth mixing ratio. The production of MAHs keeps increasing from 27.4% for PP plastic single gasification to 41.8% for 0.75 water hyacinth mixing ratio, while the production of NAHs decreases continuously from 46.9% to 35.5%. It can be observed that the mixing of water hyacinth brings about different synergistic effects on different tar components. The water hyacinth biomass is rich in a large number of alkali metals and alkaline earth metals, which leads to a synergistic reaction in the co-gasification process [34]. In addition, the mixture of biomass and plastic reduces the H/C atomic ratio of char, which can improve the degree and stability of carbon structure. These factors are helpful to tar cracking and reforming.
In this study, the gasification characteristics at a blending ratio of 0.75 showed the best hydrogen yield (0.34 Nm3/kg) and the lowest tar yield (0.133 g/g). Table 5 lists the biomass microwave chemical looping gasification characteristics for different feedstocks and oxygen carriers. The comparison of different feedstocks revealed that PP is an excellent feedstock for gas production, but the tar yield is higher [35]. Faced by this issue, this study combines municipal solid waste PP plastic and organic solid waste water hyacinth to explore the effect of mixing ratio on syngas performance and tar removal. It is a meaningful exploration that the quality of microwave chemical looping gasification can be effectively improved and by-product tar production can be reduced.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the microwave chemical looping synergistic gasification characteristics of polypropylene plastic and water hyacinth are experimentally investigated. In summary, tar cracking was promoted and syngas yield was slightly reduced with an increased water hyacinth mixing ratio. The cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion reached the maximum values of 77.64% and 69.9%, and the H2 yield and H2/CO ratio in the syngas improved to 0.34 Nm3/kg and 1.62 under the water hyacinth mixing ratio of 0.75. This is attributed to the oxygen carrier being able to transfer most of the lattice oxygen in the bulk phase through the oxygen vacancy to physical adsorption oxygen for gasification, according to the XPS characterization results. In addition, the generation of tar was reduced, the content of MAHs products in tar was increased, the content of NAHs products decreased, and the content of PAHs products first decreased and then increased with the increased hyacinth mixing ratio. This work is dedicated to exploring the synergistic properties on the microwave chemical looping gasification of PP plastic and water hyacinth in order to realize the synergistic resource utilization of multiple wastes and organic solid wastes to solve the environmental problems caused by improper disposal of wastes. It lays the foundation for further exploration of the continuous operation mechanism and reaction characteristics in a pilot-scale reactor in the future.

Author Contributions

F.A.: Methodology, Software, Investigation, Writing—original draft., D.C.: Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing—review & editing, Data curation, W.M.: Writing—review, Formal analysis, Y.Y.: Writing—review, Formal analysis, D.S.: Methodology, Validation, Z.Z.: Resources, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, and X.W.: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing—review & editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was financially supported by the Science and Technology Project of China Energy Science and Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. (D2023Y01), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC1910000).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Fengxia An and Ying Yu was employed by China Energy Science and Technology Research Institute Co. Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Abbreviation
MAHsMonocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
NAHsNaphthalene and bicyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
CLGChemical looping gasification
PPPolypropylene
ARAnalytical reagent
SiCSilicon carbide
GC-MSGas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Variables
YiYield of each single gas component in the syngas, i = H2, CO, CO2, CH4 (Nm3/kg fuel)
V N 2 N2 flow rate at the inlet under room temperature (m3/s)
XiVolume fraction of each single gas component measured online by the gas analyzer, i = H2, CO, CO2, CH4 (%)
m0Total mass of fuel introduced to the reactor (kg)
YgTotal gas yield (Nm3/kg fuel)
PiRelative portion of each single gas component in the gas product (%)
L H V Lower heating value (MJ/Nm3)
η c Carbon conversion rate (%)
CGECold gas efficiency (%)
fcMass fraction of carbon in the added fuel (%)
q 0 Low calorific value of the introduced fuel (MJ/kg)
H 2 / C O H2/CO ratio in the gas product
C O / C O 2 CO/CO2 ratio in the gas product

References

  1. Stephen, J.L.; Periyasamy, B. Innovative developments in biofuels production from organic waste materials: A review. Fuel 2018, 214, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Iglinski, B.; Kujawski, W.; Kielkowska, U. Pyrolysis of Waste Biomass: Technical and Process Achievements, and Future Development—A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hetland, J.; Yowargana, P.; Leduc, S.; Kraxner, F. Carbon-negative emissions: Systemic impacts of biomass conversion: A case study on CO2 capture and storage options. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2016, 49, 330–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferreira, S.; Monteiro, E.; Brito, P.; Vilarinho, C. Biomass resources in Portugal: Current status and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 1221–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Condori, O.; García-Labiano, F.; de Diego, L.F.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Abad, A.; Adánez, J. Biomass chemical looping gasification for syngas production using ilmenite as oxygen carrier in a 1.5 kWth unit. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Samprón, I.; de Diego, L.F.; García-Labiano, F.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Abad, A.; Adánez, J. Biomass Chemical Looping Gasification of pine wood using a synthetic Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier in a continuous unit. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 316, 123908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niu, Y.H.; Chi, Z.Y.; Li, M. Advancements in biomass gasification research utilizing iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looing: A review. Mater. Rep. Energy 2024, 4, 100282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ge, H.J.; Shen, L.H.; Feng, F.; Jiang, S.X. Experiments on biomass gasification using chemical looping with nickel-based oxygen carrier in a 25 kWth reactor. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 85, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sampron, I.; Purnomo, V.; Mattiósson, T.; Leion, H.; de Diego, L.F.; García-Labiano, F. Catalytic Activity of Oxygen Carriers on the Removal of Tar Byproducts for Biomass Chemical Looping Gasification Application. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 16629–16638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, G.Q.; He, F.; Zhao, Z.L.; Huang, Z.; Zheng, A.Q.; Zhao, K.; Li, H.B. Performance of Fe-Ni bimetallic oxygen carriers for chemical looping gasification of biomass in a 10 kWth interconnected circulating fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 16021–16032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Q.R.; He, H.; Li, H.P.; Jia, J.B.; Huang, G.X.; Xing, B.L.; Zhang, C.X.; Cao, Y.J. Characteristics and kinetics of coal char steam gasification under microwave heating. Fuel 2019, 256, 115899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Tao, J.Y.; Yan, B.B.; Jiao, L.G.; Chen, G.Y.; Hu, J.L. Review of microwave-based treatments of biomass gasification tar. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qi, H.Q.; Cui, P.Z.; Liu, Z.Q.; Xu, Z.F.; Yao, D.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Yang, S. Conceptual design and comprehensive analysis for novel municipal sludge gasification-based hydrogen production via plasma gasifier. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 245, 114635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lian, M.L.; Li, S.; Wu, W.F.; Li, L.; Miao, Y.J.; Ge, Y. Graphite-assisted microwave carbon dioxide gasification of wet stalks. Renew. Energy 2023, 219, 119445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ellison, C.; Abdelsayed, V.; Smith, M.; Shekhawat, D. Comparative evaluation of microwave and conventional gasification of different coal types: Experimental reaction studies. Fuel 2022, 321, 124055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, M.T.; Deng, W.Y.; Su, Y.X.; Wang, L.H.; Chen, G. Production of hydrogen-rich syngas through microwave-assisted gasification of sewage sludge in steam-CO2 atmosphere. Fuel 2024, 357, 129855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ohnishi, T.; Kawakami, K.; Nishioka, M.; Ogura, M. Direct decomposition of NO on metal-loaded zeolites with coexistence of oxygen and water vapor under unsteady-state conditions by NO concentration and microwave rapid heating. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sulaiman, S.A.; Roslan, R.; Inayat, M.; Naz, M.Y. Effect of blending ratio and catalyst loading on co-gasification of wood chips and coconut waste. J. Energy Inst. 2018, 91, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, M.; Gao, L.; Chen, Z.H.; Ma, C.F.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.; Ma, S.; Laghari, M.; Xiao, B.; Zhang, B.P.; et al. Syngas production by catalytic in-situ steam co-gasification of wet sewage sludge and pine sawdust. Energy Convers. Manag. 2016, 111, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chattopadhyay, J.; Pathak, T.S.; Srivastava, R.; Singh, A.C. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of paper biomass and plastic mixtures (HDPE (high density polyethylene), PP (polypropylene) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate)) and product analysis. Energy 2016, 103, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, S.H.; Wang, Z.W.; Chen, G.F.; Zhang, M.J.; Sun, T.L.; Wang, Q.; Du, Z.M.; Chen, Y.; Wu, M.G.; Li, Z.F.; et al. Co-pyrolysis characteristics of forestry and agricultural residues and waste plastics: Thermal decomposition and products distribution. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 177, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Terry, L.M.; Wee, M.X.J.; Chew, J.J.; Khaerudini, D.S.; Darsono, N.; Aqsha, A.; Saptoro, A.; Sunarso, J. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of oil palm trunk and polypropylene with Ni-Mo/TiO2 and Ni/Al2O3: Oil composition and mechanism. Environ. Res. 2023, 224, 115550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Maari, M.A.; Ahmad, M.A.; Din, A.T.M.; Hassan, H.; Alsobaai, A.M. Co-pyrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch and oil palm frond with low-density polyethylene and polypropylene for bio-oil production. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.W.; Burra, K.G.; Lei, T.Z.; Gupta, A.K. Co-pyrolysis of waste plastic and solid biomass for synergistic production of biofuels and chemicals—A review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021, 84, 100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, T.H.; Hu, K.M.; Li, R.D.; Sun, Y.; Kai, X.P. Cogasification of typical plastics and rice straw with carbon dioxide. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2015, 34, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, S.Q.; Yue, X.M.; Yin, Z.Y.; Pan, T.T.; Dong, M.J.; Sun, T.Y. Study of the co-pyrolysis behavior of sewage-sludge/rice-straw and the kinetics. Proc. Int. Conf. Min. Sci. Technol. 2009, 1, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Torquato, L.M.; Braz, C.E.M.; Ribeiro, C.A.; Capela, J.M.V.; Crespi, M.S. Kinetic study of the co-firing of bagasse-sludge blends. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 121, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lahijani, P.; Zainal, Z.A.; Mohamed, A.R.; Mohammadi, M. Co-gasification of tire and biomass for enhancement of tire-char reactivity in CO2 gasification process. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 138, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, W.M.; Zhang, Y.N.; Cao, W.T.; Zhao, W.K.; Li, B.X. Microwave-assisted chemical looping gasification of plastics for H2-rich gas production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 499, 156225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. An, F.X.; Chen, D.L.; Zhong, Z.P.; Wang, X.J. Experimental investigation of the effect of microwave power on the chemical looping gasification of aquatic plant water hyacinth. J. Energy Inst. 2024, 114, 101537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burra, K.G.; Gupta, A.K. Synergistic effects in steam gasification of combined biomass and plastic waste mixtures. Appl. Energy 2018, 211, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nanda, S.; Okolie, J.A.; Patel, R.; Pattnaik, F.; Fang, Z.; Dalai, A.K.; Kozinski, J.A.; Naik, S. Catalytic hydrothermal co-gasification of canola meal and low-density polyethylene using mixed metal oxides for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 42084–42098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zheng, Y.W.; Li, D.H.; Pei, T.; Wang, J.D.; Liu, C.; Lu, Y.; Lin, X.; Li, J.R.; Zheng, Z.F. Mechanism of synergistic effects and kinetic analysis in bamboo-LDPE waste ex-situ catalytic co-pyrolysis for enhanced aromatic hydrocarbon production via CeZrAl and HZSM-5 dual catalyst. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hognon, C.; Dupont, C.; Grateau, M.; Delrue, F. Comparison of steam gasification reactivity of algal and lignocellulosic biomass: Influence of inorganic elements. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmad, F.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, W.; Zhao, W.; Xiong, Q.; Li, B. Microwave-assisted chemical looping gasification of sugarcane bagasse biomass using Fe3O4 as oxygen carrier for H2/CO-rich syngas production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 501, 157675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fuel test sample diagram: (a) water hyacinth, (b) PP plastic.
Figure 1. Fuel test sample diagram: (a) water hyacinth, (b) PP plastic.
Fire 08 00076 g001
Scheme 1. Microwave chemical looping gasification test apparatus.
Scheme 1. Microwave chemical looping gasification test apparatus.
Fire 08 00076 sch001
Figure 2. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on gas–liquid–solid yields.
Figure 2. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on gas–liquid–solid yields.
Fire 08 00076 g002
Figure 3. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on syngas yield.
Figure 3. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on syngas yield.
Fire 08 00076 g003
Figure 4. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on syngas composition distribution.
Figure 4. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on syngas composition distribution.
Fire 08 00076 g004
Figure 5. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion (a) and lower heating value (b).
Figure 5. Effect of water hyacinth mixing ratio on cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion (a) and lower heating value (b).
Fire 08 00076 g005
Figure 6. Influence of water hyacinth mixing ratio on the ratios of H2/CO and CO/CO2.
Figure 6. Influence of water hyacinth mixing ratio on the ratios of H2/CO and CO/CO2.
Fire 08 00076 g006
Figure 7. XPS spectrums of Fe element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Figure 7. XPS spectrums of Fe element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Fire 08 00076 g007
Figure 8. XPS spectrums of O element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Figure 8. XPS spectrums of O element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Fire 08 00076 g008
Figure 9. Variation of tar yield under different blending ratios of water hyacinth.
Figure 9. Variation of tar yield under different blending ratios of water hyacinth.
Fire 08 00076 g009
Figure 10. Variation in the contents of tar components under different blending ratios of water hyacinth.
Figure 10. Variation in the contents of tar components under different blending ratios of water hyacinth.
Fire 08 00076 g010
Table 1. Elemental analysis results of water hyacinth and PP plastics (air-dried basis, %).
Table 1. Elemental analysis results of water hyacinth and PP plastics (air-dried basis, %).
MaterialCHONS
Water hyacinth28.554.0332.302.040.81
PP plastic83.6112.823.570-
Table 2. Changes in the relative contents of Fe elemental valence states in oxygen carrier.
Table 2. Changes in the relative contents of Fe elemental valence states in oxygen carrier.
Valence State of the ElementUnitBefore ReactionMixing Ratio of 0.75Mixing Ratio of 0.5
Fe2p3/2Fe3+at%51.7721.2222.87
Fe2+at%48.2373.8669.67
Fe0at%-4.927.46
Table 3. Changes in the relative contents of O element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Table 3. Changes in the relative contents of O element valence states in oxygen carrier.
Valence State of the ElementUnitPre-ReactionMixing Ratio of 0.75Mixing Ratio of 0.5
O1sO2−at%29.7015.655.86
O2−/Oat%41.7645.6649.07
O2at%28.5338.6945.07
Table 4. Changes in the contents of tar components under different water hyacinth blending ratios.
Table 4. Changes in the contents of tar components under different water hyacinth blending ratios.
Tar Components00.250.50.75
PAHs25.6821.5219.8222.73
NAHs46.9244.5441.5935.46
MAHs27.4033.9438.5941.81
Table 5. Biomass microwave chemical looping gasification characteristics for different feedstocks and oxygen carriers.
Table 5. Biomass microwave chemical looping gasification characteristics for different feedstocks and oxygen carriers.
FeedstockConditionOxygen CarrierGasification EffctReference
PP890 W, 900 °C, airNiFe20OxGas yield = 81.3 mmol/g PP, Tar yield = 23.3 wt.%[29]
Sugarcane bagasse880 W, 800 °C, airFe3O4Syngas yield (wt.%) = 88.23%[35]
Water hyacinth: PP = 0.75900 °C, 1000 W, steam = 0.1 mL/minIron Oreηc = 69.9%, CGE = 77.64%, H2 yield = 0.34 Nm3/kg, tar yield = 0.133 g/gThis Study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, F.; Chen, D.; Mao, W.; Yu, Y.; Shao, D.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, X. Microwave Chemical Looping Synergistic Gasification of Polypropylene Plastic and Water Hyacinth. Fire 2025, 8, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8020076

AMA Style

An F, Chen D, Mao W, Yu Y, Shao D, Zhong Z, Wang X. Microwave Chemical Looping Synergistic Gasification of Polypropylene Plastic and Water Hyacinth. Fire. 2025; 8(2):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8020076

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Fengxia, Delu Chen, Wenli Mao, Ying Yu, Danyang Shao, Zhaoping Zhong, and Xiaojia Wang. 2025. "Microwave Chemical Looping Synergistic Gasification of Polypropylene Plastic and Water Hyacinth" Fire 8, no. 2: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8020076

APA Style

An, F., Chen, D., Mao, W., Yu, Y., Shao, D., Zhong, Z., & Wang, X. (2025). Microwave Chemical Looping Synergistic Gasification of Polypropylene Plastic and Water Hyacinth. Fire, 8(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8020076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop