Next Article in Journal
Correction: Wang et al. Effectiveness in Mitigating Forest Fire Ignition Sources: A Statistical Study Based on Fire Occurrence Data in China. Fire 2022, 5, 215
Previous Article in Journal
Behavior and Capacity of Moment-Frame Members and Connections during Fire
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Fire
Volume 6
Issue 2
10.3390/fire6020079
fire-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Combustion and Stubble Burning: A Major Concern for the Environment and Human Health

by
Ishita Chanana
1,†,
Aparajita Sharma
1,†,
Pradeep Kumar
1,2,*,
Lokender Kumar
1,
Sourabh Kulshreshtha
1,
Sanjay Kumar
3 and
Sanjay Kumar Singh Patel
4,*
1
Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, School of Biotechnology, Shoolini University, Solan 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India
2
Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, College of Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon 443-749, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Life Sciences, School of Basic Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Fire 2023, 6(2), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020079
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 17 February 2023 / Published: 20 February 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Combustion is an essential process for humanity, but it has created turbulence in society due to the pollutant emissions from the partial completion of its process and its byproducts. The regular population is unaware of the repercussions being faced in terms of health deterioration, product quality degradation, biodiversity loss, and environmental harm. Although strategic planning against the effects is being applied sideways by the authorities to the local population and industrial facilities, the awareness in the local population is still minimal. The indicators for bioremediation being required, observed through increased sales of pharmaceutical medicines and supplements, air filters, and new techniques, include smog, elevation in respiratory disease, health immune system deterioration, decreasing life span, increasing mortality rate, and degradation in the food and water quality. This article gives a brief overview of the problems being faced due to uncontrolled combustion activities, the sources of pollutants, their creation, emission, and dispersal process, along with the mitigation techniques developed to overcome the after-effects on human health and environment.

1. Introduction

The exothermic fuel combustion reactions have been regarded as the key reason for air pollution and worsening human health conditions [1]. Their consumption for global energy generation has increased 22-fold, from 5973 tWh in 1900 to 136,018 tWh [2], with the majority being produced via gas-based combustion, followed by coal and oil combustion. The USA, Russia, China, and India are among the foremost fuel-consuming countries. With an 8 million (M) annual death rate due to fossil fuel pollution (2018), s 3.2 M yearly death rate, and 237,000 infant fatalities due to household emissions (2020), the emissions from industries (e.g., iron, steel, aluminum, and coke production), household (e.g., cooking and indoor heating), traffic and roadway (vehicular exhaust from gasoline and diesel consumption), and coal, petroleum, and vegetative fuel combustion, often produce several byproducts from complete and incomplete combustion process which are being classified as a threat to human health and environment [3]. Stubble burning is a common agricultural practice that can have significant environmental air pollution concerns and impacts on human health. Conversely, the burning of chaff produces large amounts of particulate matter and causes serious respiratory impacts [4]. An increasing population leads to increases in crop production demand, thereby increasing stubble production. The effect of crop residue burning in northwest India can be directly evaluated with a study stating 149 million tonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide (CO2), 9.0 Mt of carbon monoxide (CO), 0.25 Mt of sulfur oxide (SOX), 1.28 Mt of particulate matter (PM), and 0.07 Mt of black carbon (BC), which has found to be directly affecting Delhi’s air quality index (AQI) [5]. Smog increase had led to 84.5% of the population suffering from heart disease, 76.8% from eye irritation, 44.8% from nose irritation, and 45.5% from throat irritation. Cough increased by 41.6% and wheezing problems by 18.0% [6]. In the Delhi National Capital Region (NCR), an amount of 1.35 Mt of crop residue burning is to expected by the end of 2023 [7]. The oxides of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), aromatic amines, heterocyclic aromatic compounds, formaldehyde, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), benzene, aldehydes and alkenes, soot, and other fine particles are byproducts of combustion. The pollutants released may enter the environment as additional constituents, unbalancing the stabilized greenhouse gasses’ (GHGs)—i.e., CO2 and methane (CH4)—concentration in the atmosphere, which keeps the heat energy from escaping into space, resulting in global warming. According to the system of air quality and weather forecasting and research (SAFAR), stubble burning’s contribution to air pollution (as PM) was 25% in 2021, 32% in 2020, and 19% in 2019, while the fire count between September and November was 71,304 in 2021, and 83,002 in 2020, respectively. This has been known to directly affect Delhi’s AQI [8]. The mitigation of GHGs is feasible by various biological approaches towards value-added products [9,10,11]. The Indian Agency for Research on Cancer has classified outdoor air pollutants under the human carcinogen category, as they have turned earth’s air unbreathable [12]. The un-stabilized atmosphere gas concentration has become an instigating factor of human health, resulting in cardiovascular (ischemic heart disease), respiratory (acute lower respiratory tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, lung cancer, tuberculosis), and genetic diseases (heart attack, asthma, coughing), as well as cancer and premature death [13,14,15]. Thus, the repercussions faced by mankind and the environment due to combustion activities and stubble burning have been briefly discussed in the article, along with their sources and some mitigation strategies for creating awareness about combustion activity-based pollution and its status in society.
This review is a collection of theoretical, modeling, and experimental studies from 2015 onwards evaluated with the help of PubMed, Google scholar, Science direct, and Research gate search tools. A narrative review provides an overview of issues associated with uncontrolled combustion activities and pollutant sources along with mitigation techniques for sustainable human and environmental development.

2. Combustion and Stubble Burning Effluent Emissions

The planet has supported the production of ample oxygen and combustion fires since the time of adequate vegetation. Fire regimes are highly influenced by ecosystem composition, viz., fire frequency, spatial continuity, size, seasonality, types of fire (surface or ground fire, crown fire), fire severity, and intensity [16,17]. Industrial combustion, domestic combustion, societal combustion, agricultural combustion, and support services are the significant influencers of combustion due to human involvement with some risks and benefits [18]. The most tenacious combustion occurrence is smoldering combustion, as it is the most destructive fire process, which is a slow and low-temperature activity and a flameless burning process. Smoldering combustion is emerging as an industrial and environmental challenge; smoldering fires are a rising concern globally. During the smoldering process, sometimes, the flames’ disappearance follows a greater extension, devouring amounts of fuel and liberating toxic gases in the environment. Sturdy buoyant forces are involved in these kinds of fires, where firebrands initiated by bark and twigs are elevated and carried long distances (hundreds of meters) by the wind in downward directions, igniting several fire scenes [19]. There are research gaps in smoldering combustion, which can also be a beneficiary process for human beings. To have detailed knowledge, one can make use of recent reviews [20,21,22,23,24]. Globally 26–29% of forest loss is because of forest fires during the 2001–2019 period, which is higher compared to the 2001–2015 (21–25%) and 2003–2014 (12–18%) periods. Due to fire incidents, boreal forests have a high segment of forest loss (69–73%), following subtropical (19–22%), temperate (17–21%), tropical (6–9%), and rainforests (7–9%). Australia has an increasing trend in forest loss in the tropical, subtropical, and temperate areas, and in Eurasia, boreal forests demonstrate a high loss proportion [25,26,27]. In India, about 52,785 and 345,989 forest fires were analyzed from Nov 2020 to June 2021, i.e., the forest fire period, using a moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer sensor and Suomi National Polar Orbiting Partnership Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer suite. In Indian forests throughout the fire season, 54.4% see occasional fire, with 7.49% moderately frequent fires and 2.40% high incidence levels, and 35.71% remains non-exposed [28]. Recent fire events in Brazil, Australia, and California have again drawn full attention towards forest fires, chiefly the Amazonian fires, where whether forests or deforested areas were burning was not clear [29,30]. On the other hand, the waste and recycling industry is on the verge of providing energy, recycling, sorting, and yielding waste fires, which is an epidemic, as reviewed by Fogelman (2018). Germany, the UK, Sweden, Austria, and Italy are some of the major countries in Europe with the most incidents of waste fires [31,32]. However, major health risks were also observed with the waste fire incidents that have occurred in the cities of the USA and Thailand [33,34]. Stubble burning is the major contributor of air pollution by emissions of CH4 SOx, PM of 10 (PM10) and 2.5 (PM2.5) microns, nitrogen oxides (NOx), CO2, and CO in mostly South Asian countries such as India, Nepal, Bangladesh, and Pakistan and also in China (Figure 1). Globally, around one-fourth of biomass burning activities (household cooking, countryside communal refuse ignition, wildfires) are constituted by stubble burning regimes including forest fires comprehensively [35]. Due to changes in patterns of cropping and harvesting and water scarcity, agricultural fires are increasing in India [36]. Despite various interventions and the banning of these crop residue burning practices, this burning regime is still extensive. It has engendered about 44,000–98,000 deaths in 2003–2019, with the exposure of PM substances in the atmosphere where Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh are the major contributors (Figure 2). India has a rich diversity of crops including rice, wheat, coarse cereals, pulses, oil seeds, sugarcane, cotton, jute and mesta, but rice and wheat, being rich producers, have a more diversified impact as their residues are burnt in large amounts for cropping processes. Sugarcane’s residues are also burnt in large amounts in India. About 6600 Mt of these crops residue were burnt during 2003–2016 [37]. There is a literature gap in studies of stubble burning and Diwali fireworks as these two events coincide with each other in India. Thus, the effect of the festival fireworks is somehow the same; stubble burning as SO2 and PM2.5 (900 μg/m3) are the major pollutants emitted during the fireworks process [38]. Combustion effluents are generated in response to the behavior of the burning process and product toxicity, which further resides in the fire plot (orientation and fuel’s shape), material composition, oxygen concentration, and temperature. These combustion effluents are gases, vapors, and liquids, and solid particles mix in varying ratios of combustion conditions to the material’s organic and elemental composition [39]. The effluents produced in the environment after burning the products are irritable and asphyxiant to humans. Asphyxiate gases, irritable gases, and complex molecules are some significant types of combustion effluents (Figure 3).

2.1. Combustion and Stubble Burning Contribution

Combustion, on the one hand, is full of risks and, on the other hand, is equally responsible for a number of benefits. The combustion process involves generating energy, heat, light, chemical species, mechanical work, and plasma. During the reaction between diesel fuel, hydrocarbons, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water are produced, resulting in combustion. This conversion of diesel fuel to energy is obligatory for power buses; further, it also helps in exhausting the greenhouse gases responsible for climatic change and toxic air pollutants which smudge the atmosphere [40]. A total of 25% of the world’s power is provided by internal combustion engines (ICE), which are operated by fossil fuel oils. ICEs are enhanced by the conversion of catalysis beneficial to uniting emission standards with a coating of a metal catalyst to ceramic structure in order to reduce pollutants and intensify combustion. ICEs are still the transportation industry’s future, so there should be future efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the environment, which will be discussed in the coming sections [41]. Hydrogen-fueled (HF) ICE (HF-ICE) can be a potent approach for ecological road mobility elucidations, which will also meet the neutrality objective of the EU’s 2050 CO2. These HF-ICE are advantageous over diesel engines in automobile industries as they have virtually no emissions and lofty efficiency. So, HF-ICE should be taken into consideration, noting both its advantages and its limitations [42]. Rice husk combustion (1 tonne/h) can boost an average net of 600–700 KWh electricity for any power plant with less NOx and CO effluent emission (below 250 ppm). Moreover, rice husk ash can recover bio-silica of 99.7% purity. So, rice husk combustion can be utilized for energy development [43]. Coal is the ally of the world for electricity production compared to other sources, producing 40% of the world’s supply. Abundance, affordability, standard technology, reliability, efficiency, and safety are the key benefits of coal-fired power plants [44]. The year 2021 has seen increased energy generation by coal-fired power plants by 8%, which has technically reversed the decline over the past two years. European Union (20%) > United States (16%) > India (13%) is the increasing demand trend for coal-fired stations [45].
Incorporating agricultural stalks (decomposition) into the soil can increase its fertility and level of nutrients, organic matter, microbial activity, and water-holding capacity. Bio-decomposition and vermicomposting are some of the decomposition techniques for crop residue management that are helpful in the generation of bio-compost and bio-fertilizers, respectively, which can be further used in agricultural practices. Biochar production by the conversion of biomass by thermal combustion can be used for reducing carbon footprints during rice production [46]. Crop residue waste can be used to produce biogas, bio-hydrogen, and bioethanol; 12 TWh of electricity can be generated in biomass power plants with crop residue usage [47]. In Iran, a study evaluated that 2082 Mm3 (hydrogen), 6542 Mm3 (biogas), and 2443 M liter (butanol) could be yielded by 24.3 Mt of crop residue [48]. Crop residues can be used for bioenergy production and thus will be helpful for waste and air pollution management.

2.2. Dispersal of the Combustion and Stubble Burning Effluents

During the combustion of various materials, many effluents are dispersed in the environment, which can have an affect depending on the exposure duration, receptor susceptibility, and transmission process. These combustion effluents consist of solid gases, vapors, and liquid droplets with a particular size range. After cooling fire effluents, a chemical composition still exists where vapors form in submicron fields by condensation into liquid droplets and solid particles. Inhalation hazards during a fire by the occupants in remote areas are prevented when acid gases, organic particulates, and vapors are retained on building surfaces and elevated after fire risks [49]. The effluents are emitted into the air, water, and terrestrial environments. PAHs, hydrocarbons, VOCs, metals, dioxins, suspended solids, and ammonia are key concerning effluents produced during the firing process [50]. Burning stubble, such as sugarcane, can accumulate mercury in the soil and streams. Mercury can be toxic to humans and wildlife and cause developmental problems in fetuses. Stubble burning is the source of major gaseous pollutants, i.e., GHGS, NOx, SOx, and PM (PM10 and PM2.5), causing major human and environmental health issues. Approximately 63 Mt of crop stubble can emit CO (3.4 Mt), CO2 (91 Mt), CH4 (0.6 Mt), NOx (0.1 Mt), and PM (1.2 Mt) into the environment [4]. A recent study likely reported CO2 (176 teragrams (Tg)), CO (10 Tg), CH4 (314 gigagrams (Gg)), N2O (8.1 Gg), NH3 (151 Gg), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC, 814 Gg), PM2.5 (453 Gg), and PM10 (936 Gg) emissions from crop residue burning in northwestern India [51]. These stubble burning pollutants are transported from the Indian Punjab region to Pakistan, and vice versa. According to the air’s trajectory analysis, it was found that with compact bumps from the adjacent countries, transnational dispersal of pollutants exists across Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Nepal [52,53]. According to the world bank data, USD 8.1 trillion yearly is the cost of health damages originating by air pollution, which corresponds to 6.1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) globally [54]. In India, USD 28·8 billion of economic losses were recorded in 2019, and this cumulative deprivation of USD 36·8 billion was 1.36% of India’s GDP [55].

3. Health Concerns and Impact on the Environment

The impact of emission constituents on the environment and human health is assessed with respect to the fuel type, emissions, ambient concentration, exposure time, dose amount, and population type (location, age, sex, immunity, physical health, sensitive group, and additional health conditions). This has been observed in children, who have a high a comparatively vulnerability rate, in the research mentioned by Perera and his coworkers and Calderón and his coworkers on the differential impact of air pollutant exposure on the younger generation from different economic categories, skin pigmentation, and geographical location [56,57]. The exposure to the fuel emissions released results in the entry of these pollutants into the respiratory tract, distal organs, tissues, and bloodstream causing viral infections, neurodevelopmental disorders, allergic reactions, depleting immunity response time, and genetic alterations, as experimentally proven in epidemiological studies [58,59,60].

3.1. Environment Impact on Biotic and Abiotic Factors of the Ecosystem

The pollutant exposure of the human population, especially of the sensitive age group, to air with poor AQI entering the internal system overturns the body’s biochemical processes and physiology. This underlies the occurrence of neurodegenerative disorders, cardiometabolic, cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s disease, structural change in the respiratory tract, airway pathway and alveoli oxidative stress, inflammation, disturbing levels of IgG antibodies, bisphenol A and cerebrospinal fluid DNA damage (e.g., methylation), epigenetic instability, telomere attrition, mitochondrial injury, abnormal protein homeostasis in key progenitor and structural cells, decrement in regenerative power and immune response, pulmonary fibrosis with many other degenerative harmful effects [61,62]. This has also been reported in the age group of 4–12 years, who were exposed to emission pollutants (combustion metals, PM2.5, ultrafine particles, Ozone, formaldehyde, and Ni, with additional TAR DNA-binding protein pathologies observed in megacity children (Mexico)). Other than epidemiological experimentation, in recent research studies, the impact has been estimated using a model-based evaluation which is now being used to analyze combustion initiation (substrates, reactants, and products), spread (interaction with environmental factors and biological systems), and impact process (overall effect on the living and the abiotic), followed by the application of mitigation strategies and the after-effects of these solutions.
The straw burning increases PM2.5 by 10 μg/m3, causing a mortality rate hike of 3.25% (1.56% per month), contributed mainly to a rise in cardiorespiratory cases by 1.82% [63]. A 10-point increment in the amount of straw burning might lead to a 1.71% rise in all-cause mortality rates and 1.91% rise in cardiorespiratory mortality rates. Another similar study where fixed-effects panel regression models in combination with high-resolution satellites for monitoring 1650 ground-level stations (2013–2015) during straw burning observed 2096 (2013), 1861 (2014), and 2038 (2015) in three years from 2013–2015 in 157 cities’ burning points and pointed out the direct effect of straw burning on PM concentration (92 μg/m3 per month observed). A 10-point monthly increase in burning incidents leads to a 3.67% increase in urban PM10 by a value of 5.19 μg/m3 [64]. The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite images and ground-based monitoring pointed out the proportionality between the rice straw open burning and the ambient air quality in Pathumthani (Bangkok Metropolitan Region) through the high number of hotspots observed in the burning season (November 2003–April 2004). A linear relationship of the number of total hotspots with R2 of 0.56 for CO and 0.77 for PM10 was observed, resulting in high air pollution levels in the area [65]. According to model-based research by Lan and coworkers using Global Fire Emission Database v4.1s with Regional chemistry and transport model (2003–2019), 64–90% of residue emissions from Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh crop is the contributing reason for observed premature deaths (40,000–100,000), with respect to the Integrated Exposure Response Function and the India Specific Value of Statistical Life [37]. There is a differential impact of air pollutant exposure on the younger generation from different economic categories, skin pigmentation, and geographical locations observed. Thus, combustion pollution affects populations with various characteristics. The impact on vegetation includes decreased activity of photosynthetic machinery, the water transport system, the nutrient uptake and assimilation system, reduction in plant growth, seedling weight, biomass, and nutrient content, chlorosis, necrosis, high metal accumulation in plant parts, and wilting, which has also been validated by the different model system [66,67,68]. Soil fertility, water holding capacity, nutrient content, and microbiota become affected as the contaminants from emissions settle on soil [69,70]. Fuel emissions, when in contact with the earth’s atmosphere, increase the temperature levels and breathing air concentration variability (due to escalated concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere), causing infiltration of more UV rays, rises in sea level, ocean acidification, acid rain, degraded visibility due to heavy smog (smoke and fog), microbiota variability in air, water, and soil due to variance in biogeochemical cycles. The direct and prolonged effects have been reported by different research studies [71,72,73,74], During the combustion of various materials, many effluents are dispersed in the environment which have an impact depending on the exposure duration, receptor susceptibility, transmission process.

3.2. Reaction Processes between Effluents and Environment

The combustion process, on its forthcoming release of pollutants in the atmosphere, allows the pollutant to interact with the existent abiotic factors. The biogeochemical cycles are affected directly, as the pollutant gas concentration in the atmosphere is elevated from the normal limited concentration level, altering the substrates and products involved in the continuous processing cycle. As a result, the end product of the cycle interacting with a definitive source such as air, soil, and water alters the course [75]. COX released in the atmosphere as exhaust gas results in temperature elevation of the earth as a greenhouse gas by absorption and heat radiation energy (greenhouse effect). Fly ash, when released with the oxides of sulfur and nitrogen, affects the cloud condensation and ice nucleation activity-assisted fly ash. As for NOX and SOX, as they rise in the air after releasing as emission, their oxidation occurs in the presence of O2 (air) and H2O (rainwater), resulting in acid rain [76]. VOCs, other than increasing the Earth’s temperature (greenhouse effect), damage the material surface and causes tropospheric photochemical oxidant formation, ozone layer depletion, release of odor, the formation of smog (VOCs in smoke combine with fog) [77]. The common pollutants such as CO2, CO, CH4, N2O, NOx, SO2, black carbon, non-methyl hydrocarbons (NMHC), VOC, and PM released from stubble burning have a direct impact on the environment and health. Air pollution’s effect on animals, vegetation, and other organisms in the surrounding niche has been observed to be detrimental [78]. The paddy residue burning cost is INR 8953 per ha, with INR 31,990 M annual social cost in the region of northwest India, with 1 tonne accounting for 5.5 kg of N, 2.3 kg of phosphorous (P), 25 kg of potassium (K), and 1.2 kg of S [79]. Along with a nutrients loss of 100% of C, 80% of N, 25% of P, 21% of K, and 50–60% of S in soil, a release of 3 kg of PM, 60 kg of CO, 1460 kg of CO2, 199 kg of ash, and 2 kg of SO2 from 1 tonne of straw burning was also observed [80]. The effect of burning different crop residues on the environment and health has been briefly described in Table 1.

4. Aftermath of Combustion and Stubble Burning

Combustion and stubble burning come with self-declaring productive and fatalistic effects in excessive amounts with short- and long-term impacts in regional, urban, and environmental areas, globally. Smoldering and flaming fires have diverse effects: peat land wildfires produce haze-like pollution episodes affecting various people’s health and suppression difficulty. The main cause of wildfire mortality is the prolonged duration of the substantial transfer of heat during smoldering to the forest surface. These sunken fires release primeval carbon hoarded in the soil, which has matured for more than 10,000 years [90]. It is very critical to ensure the prevention and dominance of fires in coal mines, which increase future coal fire risks, coal-dust pollution, property losses, damage to equipment, and gas accidents [91]. Air pollutants are produced through combustion by which the land carbon cycle is influenced further, resulting in damaged photosynthetic vegetation and affecting photosynthetic processes with the increase in diffuse radiation, thus diminishing terrestrial productivity [92]. Between 15–25 years, areas burning below the prescribed fire conditions succeeding large-scale mortality become converted to long-term shrub fields due to the significant loss of seed sources and regenerative trees for the regeneration of post-fire conifers [93]. Fires have negative and positive ecological impacts, namely, global warming, land infertility, damaged ecological diversity, nutrient recycling, and vegetation regeneration (Figure 4) [94].

5. Combating Alternatives and Strategies

Recently, a report has been analyzed by the International Association of Fire and Rescue Services (CTIF) in which detailed information has been recorded for all the fire incidents which occurred globally from the year 1993 to 2020 [95]. In the present review, we have presented relative data for the fire occurrences throughout the years from 2016 to 2020 in various countries, chiefly, the USA, China, India, Russia, and Spain, and Republic of Korea (Figure 5), as these are the major countries for fuel and energy production. The fire outbreak scenario is 1388,500 (2021) > 454,206 (2020) > 345,989 (2021) > 252,000 (2020) > 129,544 (2019) > 38,659 (2020) for the USA, Russia, India, China, Spain, and Republic of Korea, respectively. Different types of fire were reported as follows: USA: 15% vehicles fire, 19.9% grass/brush fire, 16.2% rubbish, 13.4% others; Russia: 3.8% vehicles fire, 3.3% forest fire, 28.1% grass/brush fire, 26.9% rubbish, 5.2% others; Republic of Korea: 11.8% vehicles fire, 2.0% forest fire, 2.2% grass/brush fire, 7.6% rubbish, 11.9% others. The number of fire deaths were also analyzed in these countries based on year, inhabitants, and fire number, as summarized in (Table 2). In 2020, it is examined that around 24.2% of fires occurred in residential buildings and other fires were basically limited to forest, grass, and rubbish areas. In these fires, 61% are burn injuries and 82.5% of fire deaths have been registered.
The effective counter strategies include reducing the dependency on combustion, improving combustion efficiency, using clean technologies, controlling the combustion process for lesser emissions, recycling emission pollutants, and reducing the health impact by combating measures concerning economy control [94]. The air pollution control methods usually applied are the use of scrubbers, air filters, cyclones, electrostatic precipitators, mist collectors, incinerators, catalytic reactors, biofilters, powertrain technologies (hybridization, diagnostics, and controls), fuel emulsifiers, additives, blenders, injection strategies, Sand WFGD technologies [96,97]. Other pollutant reduction methods, including air and fuel staging, flue gas recirculation, selective catalytic reaction systems, low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation (diesel engine), and automatic identification system-based ship traffic exhaust emission systems, have also been reported for their efficient application [98,99,100]. The existing and new fuel process and emission assessing technologies require a thorough study for their path layout, application design, and the curbing of negative results and limitations. The integration of mathematics and artificial intelligence as a combating strategy has been found to be quite efficient. Several emission prediction model systems help in finding out the total emissions and mitigation applications, such as ANFIS-PSO (Hg), SARFIMA-NARX, CALPUFF, AERMOD (marine), and GEOS-Chem (version 9.1.3) [101,102]. Following the initiatives and energy policies taken by China under the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (APPCAP), WRF-CMAQ (PM2.5) was created to control PM2.5 [103,104]. The provincial emission reduction policies and provincial renewable energy policies have been found to have positive impacts on the reduction of PM10 and SO2 and PM2.5, respectively [105]. Moreover, several states have created policies, applied strategies, and assessed their limitations against combustion-based pollution and have already received better results alongside working on the critical failures. The goals are set out by the United Nations sustainable development goals (UN-SDGs). Goal 13 aims for climate preservation by taking control over pollution emitting means. It is followed by UN-SDG-7, which is looking for sustainable solutions to replace the process, since most of the anthropogenic activities have become a necessity for the continuation of socioeconomic [106]. Several countries, namely, the USA and India, have created policies and laws such as emission reduction and renewable energy policies to keep the industries under control, such as the Clean Air Act, the National Biofuel Policy of India, the Global Burden of Disease–Pollution and Health Initiative [107,108,109,110]. In India, with the use of in situ (CRM machinery, PUSA bio-decomposer) and ex situ crop residue management, the paddy crop stubble burning number has been found to improve with a reduction of 24,758 (31.5%) in 2021–2022. This is due to the introduction of the Crop Residue Management (CRM) Scheme (2018–2023) by the Indian Government with a released fund of INR 30,620 M, which has been utilized by different states for purchasing machinery and custom hiring centers, causing the amount of stubble burning to drop by 3326 (47.6%) in Haryana, 21,382 (30.0%) in Punjab, 50 (19.3%) in Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi (NCT), and a total drop of 56 AQI in Delhi. The total CRM machinery purchase is 1.20 Lakh in Punjab, 72,700 in Haryana, and 7480 in Uttar Pradesh with an included number of 30,975 custom hiring centers in Punjab and Haryana [111]. In situ incorporation, including the use of reaper binder, baler, straw chopper, rotavator, mulching, seed drill, and happy seeder, are a few methods followed as alternative pathways for reusing the crop residue to decrease the amount of residue burning, which overall reduces the impact on the environment [112,113]. Another alternative source for overcoming the impact of residue burning is bioenergy conversion [114]. A study carried out to evaluate this possibility resulted in biochar with 0.985 MJ input/MJ output index and 72.3% energy efficiency, which was the most energy-valuable pyrolysis product. The use of crop residue in pharmaceutics is still undergoing research. Pharmaceutical medicines, such as Unani medicine, are used for countering poor air quality generated health issues [115]. Using similar studies, mitigation techniques can be applied and checked using mathematical models to prove their overall methodological performance and efficient results. This results in less time consumption, limitation removal, and clearance for the developed sustainable combustion process to be applied at the macroscale, globally.

6. Opinion

Many households and large-energy-producing industries use batch-boilers (solid fuel usage), releasing large amounts of harmful compounds in the environment, which also exceeds the standard protocol of PN: EN 303-5:2012. So, these less-efficient heating sources should be replaced with modern or significantly more efficient equipment following standard procedures [116]. Electricity generation should be encouraged using, among other alternative, biogas, a renewable source for waste management produced by carbonaceous residues (biomass) via ecobiotechnological approaches and the co-digestion of feed for their efficient valorization along with value-added products generations [117,118,119,120,121,122]. This gas can be used as a fuel or can even be ameliorated as bio-methane. As of 2018–2019, India generated about 2.07 billion m3 of biogas annually. Therefore, biogas can be a potential manager for crop residues that are burned on a yearly basis [123]. Lignocellulosic and algal biomass is a new perspectives on producing green plastics as they emit no pollutants and reduce stubble burning. This bio-based approach can lead to a vast global economy for farmers and advance innovations domestically [124]. As the monoculture farming techniques pollute the environment, new policies should be developed such as crop rotation which is an ecofriendly policy. Still, in exchange, it is also polluting the surroundings due to continuous stubble fires between crop harvests. So, if policies are to be developed, the government should discern and focus on the farmers’ necessities, further resulting in positive impacts rather than negative [125]. Likely, the groundwater act was implemented to prevent the shortage of groundwater. Still, in response, this policy led to shrinkage and delays in the harvesting of wheat and paddy with expanded stubble fire regimes. The National Policy for Management of Crop residue (NPMCR) policy has been enforced by the Indian government. A 5% decrease in stubble fire processes in India has been noted to date but still lacking in many ways [126]. Crop residue management practices should be posed not for the time being, and for a single region, but one-for-all strategies should be employed because farmers are trying to adopt the management processes but are unwilling to do so due to financial unavailability and scientific plots such as Pusa decomposer (limited by weather, humidity, and temperature conditions). So, financial commitments should be provided to the farmers to reduce the Parali burning scenarios [46]. The rice straw in in situ management systems can be developed with the help of wheat’s direct seeding in the harvested field to increase the soil’s efficacy and reduce the costs. The improved seed drills and furrow openers can be helpful for sowing wheat, eliminating air residues (pollutants), and producing higher and potent yields [127]. Green biorefinery can be developed with the use of rice straw waste biomass for the production of valuable products in Asian countries [128]. Pine needle, sewage sludge compost, and olive pruning are some of the major organic wastes with higher elemental value (K, Ca, Mg, Na), which can be used as crop nutrients (biofertilization efficient) [129]. Studies have been undertaken where it has been found that quality fuel can be produced with a mixing of biodiesel and diesel oil, which can result in the reduction of exhaust ejaculations and exhibit superior engine performances. Moreover, in diesel particulate filter burner-type active regeneration methods are the most widely used methods [130]. Corn-cob, the residue of maize crop (high in nutrients), can be a major source of biofuel, heat, and gasification of ethanol over traditional sources, as it is a less resource-demanding crop [131].

7. Future Challenges and Perspectives

Fire plays a crucial role in impacting the ecology of the burning sites. Many approached to improving and diminishing fire effects are still not studied. This section focuses on the future work that should be considered for research. Monitoring fire should be focused on long-term outcomes rather than short-term ones. The predictive, spatial, and temporal scales should be studied for fire’s ecological understanding to minimize deprivation and maximize economic, ecological, and cultural gains. Combustion duration period, the content of energy, distribution of size, and number density should be analyzed from the waste-fire firebrand’s shower. Firebrands’ ignition events, temperature, fluxes, transportation, fire extinction with char layer growth, and potential fire size need to be evaluated. Research should be focused on trench building for firebreak in peat fires and grabbing knowledge to assess the required amounts of water for fire extinguishing. The scale and pace of benefiter fire and mechanical treatments should be increased without relying on pursuing fire suppression. Gel-stabilization foam, like most techniques, should be developed so that in coal burning-like processes, fire body temperature can be reduced with reduced thermal radiation and carbon gas emissions [132]. Coal-based composite fuels and coal-water slurries with and without petrochemicals should be introduced in coal-based power plants for the development of the green power plant industry. Decomposition processes, fodder and feed markets, happy seeder-like advanced machinery, crop diversification, and awareness campaigns should be encouraged for stubble burning mitigation issues.

8. Conclusions

Fuel combustion is a vital process for obtaining energy and carrying out several industrial processes involved in socioeconomic regulation, which are essential and beneficial for the continuation of daily lifestyle. The reality of the pollution and environmental deterioration from fuel combustion process-based outcomes cannot be denied since the combustion process is vital for mankind. Mitigation strategies, model system-based interrogation, accession, evaluation, and validation of applied emission control techniques are the solutions developed for combating the emissions produced, targeting each pollutant differentially since their reactive processes is different. Several research studies, policies, laws, UN-SDGs, and objectives are the limitations that have bound the population into controlling their unregulated anthropogenic activities, which have been causing elevations in pollutant concentration in the environment. This article presents a brief overview of the fuel combustion problem that mankind is facing, and the aggressive strategies being applied at present. The extra input initiatives are still required, and becoming aware of sustainable development and taking individual initiatives seems the only choice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.C., P.K. and S.K.S.P.; data curation, A.S., L.K., S.K. (Sourabh Kulshreshtha) and S.K. (Sanjay Kumar); writing—original draft preparation, I.C., A.S., L.K., S.K. (Sourabh Kulshreshtha) and S.K. (Sanjay Kumar); writing—review and editing, P.K. and S.K.S.P.; funding acquisition, P.K. and S.K.S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prem Kumar Khosla, Atul Khosla, Ashish Khosla, Shoolini University, Solan, for providing financial support and necessary facilities. This work was supported by the KU Research Professor Program of Konkuk University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, S.K.S.; Das, D.; Kim, S.C.; Cho, B.-K.; Lee, J.-K.; Kalia, V.C. Integrating strategies for sustainable conversion of waste biomass into dark-fermentative hydrogen and value-added products. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ritchie, H.; Roser, M.; Rosado, P. Research and Data to Make Progress against the World’s Largest Problems. 2022. Available online: OurWorldInData.org (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  3. Lewtas, J. Air pollution combustion emissions: Characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2007, 636, 95–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abdurrahman, M.I.; Chaki, S.; Saini, G. Stubble burning: Effects on health & environment, regulations and management practices. Environ. Adv. 2020, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yadav, R.S. Stubble Burning: A Problem for the Environment, Agriculture, and Humans. Down to Earth. 4 June 2019. Available online: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/agriculture/stubble-burning-a-problem-for-the-environment-agriculture-and-humans-64912 (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  6. Stubble Burning is So Bad in Punjab, That 84% Population is Having Health Issues. Available online: https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/stubble-burning-is-so-bad-in-punjab-that-84-of-population-is-having-health-issues-331980.html (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  7. Vishnoi, A. Magnitude of Stubble Problem Grows Larger: Govt Review. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/magnitude-of-stubble-problem-grows-larger-govt-review/articleshow/94571984.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  8. Omar, P. Stubble Burning Share Rises to 26% in Delhi’s Pollution, AQI Points ‘Severe’. Available online: https://www.livemint.com/news/india/stubble-burning-share-rises-to-26-in-delhi-s-pollution-aqi-points-severe-11667131222272.html (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  9. Patel, S.K.S.; Shanmugam, R.; Lee, J.-K.; Kalia, V.C.; Kim, I.-W. Biomolecules production from greenhouse gases by methanotrophs. Indian J. Microbiol. 2021, 61, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Patel, S.K.S.; Gupta, R.K.; Kalia, V.C.; Lee, J.-K. Synthetic design of methanotroph co-cultures and their immobilization within polymers containing magnetic nanoparticles to enhance methanol production from wheat straw-based biogas. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 364, 128032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Patel, S.K.S.; Kalia, V.C.; Lee, J.-K. Integration of biogas derived from dark fermentation and anaerobic digestion of biowaste to enhance methanol production by methanotrophs. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 367, 128427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Loomis, D.; Grosse, Y.; Lauby-Secretan, B.; El Ghissassi, F.; Bouvard, V.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Baan, R.; Mattock, H.; Straif, K.; et al. The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 1262–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kravchenko, J.; Ruhl, L.S. Coal Combustion Residuals and Health. In Practical Applications of Medical Geology; Siegel, M., Selinus, O., Finkelman, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 429–474. [Google Scholar]
  14. Corsini, E.; Marinovich, M.; Vecchi, R. Ultrafine particles from residential biomass combustion: A review on experimental data and toxicological response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Balmes, J.R. Household air pollution from domestic combustion of solid fuels and health. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 143, 1979–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Keeley, J.E. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: A brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2009, 18, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Belcher, C.M. The influence of leaf morphology on litter flammability and its utility for interpreting palaeofire. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Johnston, F.H.; Melody, S.; Bowman, D.M. The pyrohealth transition: How combustion emissions have shaped health through human history. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2016, 371, 20150173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Cardil, A.; de-Miguel, S.; Silva, C.A.; Reich, P.B.; Calkin, D.E.; Brancalion, P.H.S.; Vibrans, A.C.; Gamarra, J.G.P.; Zhou, M.; Pijanowski, B.C. Recent deforestation drove the spike in Amazonian fires. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 121003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rein, G. Smoldering combustion. In SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering; Hurley, M.J., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 581–603. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ohlemiller, T.J. Modeling of smoldering combustion propagation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1985, 11, 277–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. T’ien, J.S.; Shih, H.; Jiang, C.; Ross, H.D.; Miller, F.J. Mechanisms of Flame Spread 14 and Smolder Wave Propagation. In Chapter 5 in Microgravity Combustion: Fire in Free Fall; Ross, H.D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001; pp. 299–417. [Google Scholar]
  23. Babrauskas, V. Ignition Handbook; Fire Science Publishers: Issaquah, WA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Torero, J.L.; Gerhard, J.I.; Martins, M.F.; Zanoni, M.A.; Rashwan, T.L.; Brown, J.K. Processes defining smouldering combustion: Integrated review and synthesis. Prog. Energy Combus. Sci. 2020, 81, 100869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Curtis, P.G.; Slay, C.M.; Harris, N.L.; Tyukavina, A.; Hansen, M.C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 2018, 361, 1108–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Z.; Ballantyne, A.P.; Cooper, L.A. Biophysical feedback of global forest fires on surface temperature. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tyukavina, A.; Potapov, P.; Hansen, M.C.; Pickens, A.H.; Stehman, S.V.; Turubanova, S.; Parker, D.; Zalles, V.; Lima, A.; Kommareddy, I.; et al. Global trends of forest loss due to fire from 2001 to 2019. Front. Remote Sens. 2022, 3, 825190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. MoEFCC. Forest Fire Activities. In Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change; Government of India: New Delhi, India, 2021. Available online: https://fsi.nic.in/forest-fire-activities (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  29. Boer, M.M.; de Dios, R.V.; Bradstock, R.A. Unprecedented burn area of australian mega forest fires. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Manzello, S.L.; Suzuki, S.; Gollner, M.J.; Fernandez-Pello, A.C. Role of firebrand combustion in large outdoor fire spread. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 76, 100801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nigl, T.; Rübenbauer, W.; Pomberger, R. Cause-oriented investigation of the fire incidents in Austrian waste management systems. Detritus 2020, 9, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mazzucco, W.; Costantino, C.; Restivo, V.; Alba, D.; Marotta, C.; Tavormina, E.; Cernigliaro, A.; Macaluso, M.; Cusimano, R.; Grammauta, R.; et al. The management of health hazards related to municipal solid waste on fire in Europe: An environmental justice issue? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17, 6617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fogelman, R. Is the Recycling Industry Facing a Fire Epidemic? 2018. Available online: https://www.recyclingproductnews.com/article/27240/is-the-recycling-industry-facing-a-fire-epidemic (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  34. Wiwanitkit, V. Thai waste landfill site fire crisis, particular matter 10, and risk of lung cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2016, 2, 1088–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yadav, I.C.; Devi, N.L. Biomass burning, regional air quality, and climate change. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 2nd ed.; Nriagu, J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 386–391. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, T.; Marlier, M.E.; Karambelas, A.; Jain, M.; Singh, S.; Singh, M.K.; Gautam, R.; DeFries, R.S. Missing emissions from post-monsoon agricultural fires in northwestern India: Regional limitations of MODIS burned area and active fire products. Environ. Res. Commun. 2019, 1, 011007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lan, R.; Eastham, S.D.; Liu, T.; Norford, L.K.; Barrett, S.R. Air quality impacts of crop residue burning in India and mitigation alternatives. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ravindra, K.; Kumar, S.; Mor, S. Long term assessment of firework emissions and air quality during Diwali festival and impact of 2020 fireworks ban on air quality over the states of Indo Gangetic Plains airshed in India. Atmos. Environ. 2022, 285, 119223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hull, T.R.; Stec, A.A. Generation, sampling and quantification of toxic combustion products. In Toxicology, Survival and Health Hazards of Combustion Products; Purser, D.A., Maynard, R.L., Wakefield, J., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2015; Chapter 5; pp. 108–138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Abdallah, T. Sustainable Mass Transit: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Public Transportation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 1–218. [Google Scholar]
  41. Reitz, R.D.; Ogawa, H.; Payri, R.; Fansler, T.; Kokjohn, S.; Moriyoshi, Y.; Agarwal, A.K.; Arcoumanis, D.; Assanis, D.; Bae, C.; et al. IJER editorial: The future of the internal combustion engine. Int. J. Engine Res. 2020, 21, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Stępień, Z. A comprehensive overview of hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines: Achievements and future challenges. Energies 2021, 14, 6504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Steven, S.; Restiawaty, E.; Bindar, Y. Routes for energy and bio-silica production from rice husk: A comprehensive review and emerging prospect. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 149, 111329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Xue, K.; Xu, G.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Liu, T. An innovative waste-to-energy system integrated with a coal-fired power plant. Energy 2020, 194, 116893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Greenfield, C.; Alvares, C.; Lorenczik, S.; Jorquera, J. Coal Fired Electricity; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/coal-fired-electricity (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  46. Singh, D.; Dhiman, S.K.; Kumar, V.; Babu, R.; Shree, K.; Priyadarshani, A.; Singh, A.; Shakya, L.; Nautiyal, A.; Saluja, S. Crop residue burning and its relationship between health, agriculture value addition, and regional finance. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ravindra, K.; Singh, T.; Mor, S. Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abed, A.M.; Lafta, H.A.; Alayi, R.; Tamim, H.; Sharifpur, M.; Khalilpoor, N.; Bagheri, B. Utilization of animal solid waste for electricity generation in the Northwest of Iran 3E analysis for one-year simulation. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 2022, 4228483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Purser, D.A. Fire types and combustion products. In Toxicology, Survival and Health Hazards of Combustion Products; Purser, D.A., Maynard, R.L., Wakefield, J., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2015; Chapter 2; pp. 11–52. [Google Scholar]
  50. Martin, D.; Tomida, M.; Meacham, B. Environmental impact of fire. Fire Sci. Rev. 2016, 5, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Venkatramanan, V.; Shah, S.; Rai, A.K.; Prasad, R. Nexus between crop residue burning, bioeconomy and sustainable development goals over north-western India. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 8, 614212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ghosh, P.; Sharma, S.; Khanna, I.; Datta, A.; Suresh, R.; Kundu, S.; Goel, A.; Datt, D. Scoping Study for South Asia Air Pollution; The Energy Resource Institute: Delhi, India, 2019; Available online: https://airsouthasia.org/2019/07/06/scoping-study-for-south-asia-air-pollution (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  53. Shabbir, M.; Junaid, A.; Zahid, J. Smog: A Transboundary Issue and Its Implications in India and Pakistan; Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI): Islamabad, Pakistan, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  54. What You Need to Know About Climate Change and Air Pollution. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/09/01/what-you-need-to-know-about-climate-change-and-air-pollution (accessed on 27 January 2023).
  55. Pandey, A.; Brauer, M.; Cropper, M.L.; Balakrishnan, K.; Mathur, P.; Dey, S.; Turkgulu, B.; Kumar, G.A.; Khare, M.; Beig, G.; et al. Health and economic impact of air pollution in the states of India: The global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Plan. Health 2021, 5, e25–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Perera, F.P. Multiple threats to child health from fossil fuel combustion: Impacts of air pollution and climate change. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017, 125, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Ayala, A. Air pollution, ultrafine particles, and your brain: Are combustion nanoparticle emissions and engineered nanoparticles causing preventable fatal neurodegenerative diseases and common neuropsychiatric outcomes? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6847–6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, D.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, L.F.; Huang, S.X. Air pollutants and early origins of respiratory diseases. Chronic Dis. Transl. Med. 2018, 4, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Berg, E.L.; Pedersen, L.R.; Pride, M.C.; Petkova, S.P.; Patten, K.T.; Valenzuela, A.E.; Wallis, C.; Bein, K.J.; Wexler, A.; Lein, P.J.; et al. Developmental exposure to near roadway pollution produces behavioral phenotypes relevant to neurodevelopmental disorders in juvenile rats. Transl. Psychiatry 2020, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Costa, L.G.; Cole, T.B.; Dao, K.; Chang, Y.C.; Coburn, J.; Garrick, J.M. Developmental impact of air pollution on brain function. Neurochem. Int. 2019, 131, 104580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eckhardt, C.M.; Wu, H. Environmental exposures and lung aging: Molecular mechanisms and implications for improving respiratory health. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2021, 8, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Stommel, E.W.; Lachmann, I.; Waniek, K.; Chao, C.K.; González-Maciel, A.; García-rres-Jardón, R.; Delgado-Chávez, R.; Mukherjee, P.S. TDP-43 CSF Concentrations in Rojas, E., Tocrease Exponentially with Age in Metropolitan Mexico City Young Urbanites Highly Exposed to PM2.5 and Ultrafine Particles and Historically Showing Alzheimer and Parkinson’s Hallmarks. Brain TDP-43 Pathology in MMC Residents Is Associated with High Cisternal CSF TDP-43 Concentrations. Toxics 2022, 10, 559. [Google Scholar]
  63. He, G.; Liu, T.; Zhou, M. Straw burning, PM2.5, and death: Evidence from China. J. Dev. Econom. 2020, 145, 102468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Liu, T.; He, G.; Lau, A.K. Statistical evidence on the impact of agricultural straw burning on urban air quality in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tipayarom, D.; Oanh, N.K. Effects from open rice straw burning emission on air quality in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Sci. Asia 2007, 33, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Husen, A. Morpho-anatomical, physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of plants to air pollution. In Harsh Environment and Plant Resilience; Husen, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 203–234. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sillmann, J.; Aunan, K.; Emberson, L.; Büker, P.; Van Oort, B.; O’Neill, C.; Otero, N.; Pandey, D.; Brisebois, A. Combined impacts of climate and air pollution on human health and agricultural productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 093004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Verma, A.K. Influence of climate change on balanced ecosystem, biodiversity and sustainable development: An overview. Int. J. Biol. Innov. 2021, 3, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xiyan, J.; Shuxi, Z.; Shaopeng, Z.; Ting, L.; Lihong, W. Research progress on heavy metals pollution and its control in soil-crop system. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2021, 6, 150–160. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zwolak, A.; Sarzyńska, M.; Szpyrka, E.; Stawarczyk, K. Sources of soil pollution by heavy metals and their accumulation in vegetables: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Maciejczyk, P.; Chen, L.C.; Thurston, G. The role of fossil fuel combustion metals in PM2.5 air pollution health associations. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shakoor, A.; Ashraf, F.; Shakoor, S.; Mustafa, A.; Rehman, A.; Altaf, M.M. Biogeochemical transformation of greenhouse gas emissions from terrestrial to atmospheric environment and potential feedback to climate forcing. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 2, 38513–38536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Coppola, A.I.; Wagner, S.; Lennartz, S.T.; Seidel, M.; Ward, N.D.; Dittmar, T.; Santín, C.; Jones, M.W. The black carbon cycle and its role in the Earth system. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2022, 3, 516–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lelieveld, J.; Klingmüller, K.; Pozzer, A.; Burnett, R.T.; Haines, A.; Ramanathan, V. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7192–7197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Raimi, M.O.; Abiola, I.; Alima, O.; Omini, D.E. Exploring how human activities disturb the balance of biogeochemical cycles: Evidence from the carbon, nitrogen and hydrologic cycles. Res. World Agric. Econ. 2021, 2, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Losey, D.J.; Sihvonen, S.K.; Veghte, D.P.; Chong, E.; Freedman, M.A. Acidic processing of fly ash: Chemical characterization, morphology, and immersion freezing. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2018, 20, 1581–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. David, E.; Niculescu, V.C. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as environmental pollutants: Occurrence and mitigation using nanomaterials. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2021, 18, 13147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kumar, S.; Sharma, D.K.; Singh, D.R.; Biswas, H.; Praveen, K.V.; Sharma, V. Estimating loss of ecosystem services due to paddy straw burning in North-west India. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2019, 17, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Singh, G.; Kaur, K.; Meetei, T.T. Effect of in stubble burning on physico chemical properties of soil, yield and environmental qualities. Pharma Innov. J. 2021, 10, 298–305. [Google Scholar]
  80. NPMCR. National Policy for Management of Crop Residues (NPMCR). Available online: https://agricoop.nic.in (accessed on 27 January 2023).
  81. Junpen, A.; Pansuk, J.; Kamnoet, O.; Cheewaphongphan, P.; Garivait, S. Emission of air pollutants from rice residue open burning in Thailand, 2018. Atmosphere 2018, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Amk, E.S. Environmental and health impact of open burning rice straw. Egypt. J. Occup. Med. 2020, 44, 679–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jain, N.; Bhatia, A.; Pathak, H. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 422–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Montero, G.; Coronado, M.A.; García, C.; Campbell, H.E.; Montes, D.G.; Torres, R.; Pérez, L.; León, J.A.; Ayala, J.R. Wheat Straw Open Burning: Emissions and Impact on Climate Change. In Global Wheat Production; InTech: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  85. Satyendra, T.; Singh, R.N.; Shaishav, S. Emissions from crop/biomass residue burning risk to atmospheric quality. Int. Res. J. Earth Sci. 2013, 1, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kanokkanjana, K.; Garivait, S. Estimation of emission from open burning of sugarcane residues before harvesting. GMSARN Int. J. 2012, 6, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  87. Cançado, J.E.D.; Saldiva, P.H.N.; Pereira, L.A.A.; Lara, L.B.L.S.; Artaxo, P.; Martinelli, L.A.; Arbex, M.A.; Zanobetti, A.; Braga, A.L.F. The impact of sugar cane-burning emissions on the respiratory system of children and the elderly. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bilgin, S. Determination of flue gas emission values of cotton and sesame stalk briquettes. Tarım Makinaları Bilim. Derg. 2010, 6, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  89. Windeatt, J.H.; Ross, A.B.; Williams, P.T.; Forster, P.M.; Nahil, M.A.; Singh, S. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 146, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rein, G.; Huang, X. Smouldering wildfires in peatlands, forests and the arctic: Challenges and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2021, 24, 100296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fan, Y.J.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Hu, X.M.; Wu, M.Y.; Xue, D. A novel fire prevention and control plastogel to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal: Its characteristics and engineering applications. Fuel 2019, 263, 116693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yue, X.; Unger, N. Fire air pollution reduces global terrestrial productivity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Coppoletta, M.; Merriam, K.E.; Collins, B.M. Post-fire vegetation and fuel development influences fire severity patterns in reburns. Ecol. Appl. 2016, 26, 686–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Jiménez-Morillo, N.T.; Almendros, G.; José, M.; Jordán, A.; Zavala, L.M.; Granged, A.J.; González-Pérez, J.A. Effect of a wildfire and of post-fire restoration actions in the organic matter structure in soil fractions. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. World Fire Statistics International Association of Fire and Rescue Service. 2022. Available online: https://ctif.org/sites/default/files/2022-08/CTIF_Report27_ESG_0.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  96. Sofia, D.; Gioiella, F.; Lotrecchiano, N.; Giuliano, A. Mitigation strategies for reducing air pollution. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 19226–19235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ozgen, S.; Cernuschi, S.; Caserini, S. An overview of nitrogen oxides emissions from biomass combustion for domestic heat production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gholami, F.; Tomas, M.; Gholami, Z.; Vakili, M. Technologies for the nitrogen oxides reduction from flue gas: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 136712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Deng, J.; Wang, X.; Wei, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Chen, Z. A review of NOx and SOx emission reduction technologies for marine diesel engines and the potential evaluation of liquefied natural gas fuelled vessels. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 766, 144319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Majewski, W.A.; Jääskeläinen, H. Engine Emission Control. Diesel-Net Technology Guide. 2015. Available online: https://dieselnet.com/tech/engine_emission-control.php (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  101. Fuentes García, G.; Echeverría, R.S.; Reynoso, A.G.; Baldasano Recio, J.M.; Rueda, V.M.; Retama Hernández, A.; Kahl, J.D. Sea port SO2 atmospheric emissions influence on air quality and exposure at Veracruz, Mexico. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Shamshirband, S.; Hadipoor, M.; Baghban, A.; Mosavi, A.; Bukor, J.; Várkonyi-Kóczy, A.R. Developing an ANFIS-PSO model to predict mercury emissions in combustion flue gases. Mathematics 2019, 7, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Bukhari, A.H.; Raja, M.A.Z.; Shoaib, M.; Kiani, A.K. Fractional order Lorenz based physics informed SARFIMA-NARX model to monitor and mitigate megacities air pollution. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022, 161, 112375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cheng, J.; Su, J.; Cui, T.; Li, X.; Dong, X.; Sun, F.; Yang, Y.; Tong, D.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Dominant role of emission reduction in PM2.5 air quality improvement in Beijing during 2013–2017: A model-based decomposition analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 6125–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Cai, S.; Ma, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Brauer, M.; Cohen, A.; Martin, R.V.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; et al. Impact of air pollution control policies on future PM2.5 concentrations and their source contributions in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 227, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zeng, J.; Liu, T.; Feiock, R.; Li, F. The impacts of China’s provincial energy policies on major air pollutants: A spatial econometric analysis. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. UN General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; Division for Sustainable Development Goals, United Nations: Incheon, Republic of Korea, A/RES/70/1; 2022; Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  108. East, J.; Montealegre, J.S.; Pachon, J.E.; Garcia-Menendez, F. Air quality modeling to inform pollution mitigation strategies in a Latin American megacity. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 776, 145894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Saravanan, A.P.; Mathimani, T.; Deviram, G.; Rajendran, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. Biofuel policy in India: A review of policy barriers in sustainable marketing of biofuel. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 193, 734–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shaffer, R.M.; Sellers, S.P.; Baker, M.G.; de Buen Kalman, R.; Frostad, J.; Suter, M.K.; Anenberg, S.C.; Balbus, J.; Basu, N.; Bellinger, D.C.; et al. Improving and expanding estimates of the global burden of disease due to environmental health risk factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019, 127, 105001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. 31.5% Reduction in Paddy Stubble Burning Recorded in These North-Indian States. News on Air. 2022. Available online: https://newsonair.com/2022/12/06/31-5-reduction-in-paddy-stubble-burning-recorded-in-these-north-indian-states/ (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  112. Porichha, G.K.; Hu, Y.; Rao, K.T.; Xu, C.C. Crop residue management in India: Stubble burning vs. other utilizations including bioenergy. Energies 2021, 14, 4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chaitanya, A.K. Crop residue management: Strategies and challenges. Management 2022. Available online: https://www.krishisewa.com/postharvest/1388-crop-residue-management-strategies-and-challenges.html (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  114. Siddiqi, H.; Mishra, A.; Kumari, U.; Maiti, P.; Meikap, B.C. Utilizing agricultural residue for the cleaner biofuel production and simultaneous air pollution mitigation due to stubble burning: A net energy balance and total emission assessment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 15963–15972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Akhlaq, S.; Ara, S.A.; Ahmad, B.; Fazil, M.; Akram, U.; Haque, M.; Khan, A.A. Interventions of Unani medicine for maintenance of health with special reference to air quality: An evidence-based review. Environ. Health Rev. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pełka, G.; Wygoda, M.; Luboń, W.; Pachytel, P.; Jachimowski, A.; Paprocki, M.; Wyczesany, P.; Kotyza, J. Analysis of the efficiency of a batch boiler and emissions of harmful substances during combustion of various types of wood. Energies 2021, 14, 6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Patel, S.K.S.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P.; Purohit, H.J.; Kalia, V.C. Exploitation of defined bacterial cultures for production of hydrogen and polyhydroxybutyrate from pea-shells. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 36, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kumar, P.; Singh, M.; Mehariya, S.; Patel, S.K.S.; Lee, J.-K.; Kalia, V.C. Ecobiotechnological approach for exploiting the abilities of Bacillus to produce co-polymer of polyhydroxyalkanoate. Indian J. Microbiol. 2014, 54, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Patel, S.K.S.; Lee, J.-K.; Kalia, V.C. Dark-fermentative biological hydrogen production from mixed biowastes using defined mixed cultures. Indian J. Microbiol. 2017, 57, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Patel, S.K.S.; Gupta, R.K.; Das, D.; Lee, J.K.; Kalia, V.C. Continuous biohydrogen production from poplar biomass hydrolysate by a defined bacterial mixture immobilized on lignocellulosic materials under non-sterile conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 287, 125037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Patel, S.K.S.; Kumar, P.; Kalia, V.C. Enhancing biological hydrogen production through complementary microbial metabolisms. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 10590–10603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kondaveeti, S.; Patel, S.K.S.; Poglu, R.; Li, J.; Kalia, V.C.; Choi, M.-S.; Lee, J.K. Conversion of simulated biogas to electricity: Sequential operation of methanotrophic reactor effluents in microbial fuel cell. Energy 2019, 189, 116309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Satpathy, P.; Pradhan, C. Biogas as an alternative to stubble burning in India. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Machineni, L.; Anupoju, G.R. Review on valorization of lignocellulosic biomass for green plastics production: Sustainable and cleaner approaches. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Demirdogen, A.; Guldal, H.T.; Sanli, H. Monoculture, crop rotation policy, and fire. Ecol. Econ. 2023, 203, 107611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kant, Y.; Chauhan, P.; Natwariya, A.; Kannaujiya, S.; Mitra, D. Long term influence of groundwater preservation policy on stubble burning and air pollution over North-West India. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Parihar, D.S.; Dogra, B.; Narang, M.K.; Singh, S.K.; Khurana, R. Development and evaluation of notched concave disc seed drill for direct seeding of wheat in paddy stubble field. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 10, 100421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rathour, R.K.; Devi, M.; Dahiya, P.; Sharma, N.; Kaushik, N.; Kumari, D.; Kumar, P.; Baadhe, R.R.; Walia, A.; Bhatt, A.K.; et al. Recent trends, opportunities and challenges in sustainable management of rice straw waste biomass for green biorefinery. Energies 2023, 16, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rodríguez-Espinosa, T.; Navarro-Pedreño, J.; Gómez Lucas, I.; Almendro Candel, M.B.; Pérez Gimeno, A.; Zorpas, A.A. Soluble Elements Released from Organic Wastes to Increase Available Nutrients for Soil and Crops. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jia, G.; Tian, G.; Zhang, D. Effects of plateau environment on combustion and emission characteristics of a plateau high-pressure common-rail diesel engine with different blending ratios of biodiesel. Energies 2022, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Koundinya, K.K.; Dobhal, P.; Ahmad, T.; Mondal, S.; Sharma, A.K.; Singh, V.K. A technical review on thermochemical pathways for production of energy from corncob residue. Renew. Energy Focus 2023, 44, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Xue, D.; Hu, X.; Cheng, W.; Wei, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, L. Fire prevention and control using gel-stabilization foam to inhibit spontaneous combustion of coal: Characteristics and engineering applications. Fuel 2020, 264, 116903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fire 06 00079 g001 550
Figure 1. Statistics depicting the biomass burned of all crops in tonnes from the year 2016–2030.
Figure 1. Statistics depicting the biomass burned of all crops in tonnes from the year 2016–2030.
Fire 06 00079 g001
Fire 06 00079 g002 550
Figure 2. Major states of India following stubble burning practices.
Figure 2. Major states of India following stubble burning practices.
Fire 06 00079 g002
Fire 06 00079 g003 550
Figure 3. Reaction for combustion exhibiting effluents in the environment and different types of combustion (CO (Carbon monoxide), CO2 (Carbon-dioxide), HCN (Hydrogen cyanide), HCl (Hydrogen chloride), Secondary organic aerosol (SOA), NOX (Oxides of nitrogen), O3 (Ozone) and PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons)).
Figure 3. Reaction for combustion exhibiting effluents in the environment and different types of combustion (CO (Carbon monoxide), CO2 (Carbon-dioxide), HCN (Hydrogen cyanide), HCl (Hydrogen chloride), Secondary organic aerosol (SOA), NOX (Oxides of nitrogen), O3 (Ozone) and PAHs (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons)).
Fire 06 00079 g003
Fire 06 00079 g004 550
Figure 4. Advantages and disadvantages of combustion in all regions globally.
Figure 4. Advantages and disadvantages of combustion in all regions globally.
Fire 06 00079 g004
Fire 06 00079 g005 550
Figure 5. Fire outbreak statistics from 2016 to 2021.
Figure 5. Fire outbreak statistics from 2016 to 2021.
Fire 06 00079 g005
Table
Table 1. Impact of most commonly produced crops burning on pollution generation, environment, and health.
Table 1. Impact of most commonly produced crops burning on pollution generation, environment, and health.
CropCrop ResiduesResidue Produced per YearPollutant Concentration
Generated from Burning		Effect on Human HealthEffect on
Vegetation/Soil		References
RiceHusk, bran170 Mt5.34 M of CO2, 0.04 Mt of CH4, 0.42 of CO, 2000 tonnes of NOX, 2000 tonnes of SO2, 0.04 Mt of PM2.5, 0.04 Mt of PM10, 2000 tonnes of BC, and 14,000 tonnes of organic carbon from 4.54 Mt residue burningA pulmonary disease resembling asbestosis, namely pleural fibrosis and possibly bronchogenic carcinoma, and acute bronchitisSoil nutrient loss (1995–2009, India): N of 0.24 Mt per year, P of 0.01 Mt per year, and K of 0.2 Mt per year[81,82,83]
WheatBran, straw110 Mt6185 tonnes of PM, 35,983 tonnes of CO, and 1125 tonnes of CH4 considering a head fire burning or 3373 tonnes of PM, 30,360 tonnes of CO, and 731 tonnes of CH4 by backfire burning were estimated from 6.2 tonnes of wheat strawChronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumoconiosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, bronchitis, cataract, corneal opacity, and blindnessSoil nutrient loss (1995–2009, India): N of 0.08 Mt per year, P of 0.004 Mt per year, and K of 0.06 Mt per year[4,83,84,85]
SugarcaneTops, bagasse, molasses12 MtCO of 929 Gg, CO2 of 8864 Gg, and PM2.5 of 152 Gg from 1007 gdm per m2 sugarcane residual biomassIncreases of 10.2 μg/m3 in PM2.5 and 42.9 μg/m3 in PM10 were associated with increases of 21.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.3–38.5] and 31.0% (95% CI, 1.25–60.21) in child and elderly respiratory hospital admissions, respectivelySoil nutrient loss (1995–2009, India): N of 0.08 Mt per year, P of 0.001 Mt per year, and K of 0.03 Mt per year[83,86,87]
CottonLinter, staple, stalks53 Mt57 ppm CO, 196 NOX, H2S 37 ppm, CO2 7.92%, 12.81% O2 for cotton stalksRespiratory system disorders, and cardiovascular mortalityN of 0.2 kg, P of 0.8 kg, K of 6.1 kg, and S of 1.5 kg[85,86,88,89]
Table
Table 2. Mortality numbers recorded in year 2020.
Table 2. Mortality numbers recorded in year 2020.
CountryAverage No. of Deaths
per Year		Average No. of Deaths per 100,000 InhabitantsAverage No. of Deaths per 100 Fires
China11830.090.47
India13,4290.990.84
USA35301.060.27
Russia82705.633.08
Republic of Korea3290.630.79
Spain1690.360.13
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chanana, I.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, L.; Kulshreshtha, S.; Kumar, S.; Patel, S.K.S. Combustion and Stubble Burning: A Major Concern for the Environment and Human Health. Fire 2023, 6, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020079

AMA Style

Chanana I, Sharma A, Kumar P, Kumar L, Kulshreshtha S, Kumar S, Patel SKS. Combustion and Stubble Burning: A Major Concern for the Environment and Human Health. Fire. 2023; 6(2):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chanana, Ishita, Aparajita Sharma, Pradeep Kumar, Lokender Kumar, Sourabh Kulshreshtha, Sanjay Kumar, and Sanjay Kumar Singh Patel. 2023. "Combustion and Stubble Burning: A Major Concern for the Environment and Human Health" Fire 6, no. 2: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020079

APA Style

Chanana, I., Sharma, A., Kumar, P., Kumar, L., Kulshreshtha, S., Kumar, S., & Patel, S. K. S. (2023). Combustion and Stubble Burning: A Major Concern for the Environment and Human Health. Fire, 6(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020079

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop