Next Article in Journal
Surface Transformation of Ultrahigh-Temperature ZrB2–HfB2–SiC–CCNT Ceramics Under Exposure to Subsonic N2-CH4 Plasma Flow
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Apical Microleakage in Bioceramic and Resin-Based Endodontic Sealers with Conventional and Bioceramic Surface-Impregnated Gutta-Percha Points
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancement of Sol–Gel Coatings for Photoprotection of Rosé Wines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing Sintering Conditions for Y2O3 Ceramics: A Study of Atmosphere-Dependent Microstructural Evolution and Optical Performance

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Materials and Devices, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201899, China
3
Future Technology School, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Ceramics 2025, 8(2), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020066
Submission received: 30 March 2025 / Revised: 22 May 2025 / Accepted: 30 May 2025 / Published: 1 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transparent Ceramics—a Theme Issue in Honor of Dr. Adrian Goldstein)

Abstract

This paper systematically investigated the influence of sintering atmospheres, vacuum, and oxygen, on the microstructure and optical properties of Y2O3 ceramics. Compared with vacuum sintering, sintering in flowing oxygen atmosphere can effectively inhibit the grain growth of Y2O3 ceramics at the final stage of sintering and improve the uniformity of microstructure. After hot isostatic pressing, the samples pre-sintered at oxygen atmosphere showed good in-line transmittance from a visible-to-mid-infrared wavelength range (0.4–6.0 μm) except in the range of 2.8–4.1 μm. Spectral analysis showed that an obvious broadband absorption peak (2.8–4.1 μm) of characteristic hydroxyl groups is detected in the above samples. However, before densification, a low-temperature heat treatment at 600 °C under vacuum can effectively diminish the hydroxyl groups in Y2O3 ceramics. However, laser experiments in the ~1 μm wavelength range showed that although the Yb:Y2O3 ceramic carrying hydroxyl had obvious absorption in the 2.8–4.1 μm range, it had little effect on its laser oscillation in the ~1 μm wavelength. Yb:Y2O3 ceramics pre-sintered in an oxygen atmosphere at 1460 °C followed by hot isostatic pressing at 1440 °C achieved 12.85 W continuous laser output at room temperature, with a laser slope efficiency of 84.4%.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent decades, yttrium oxide (Y2O3) ceramics have garnered significant attention due to their superior properties, including low phonon energy, high thermal conductivity, good thermal stability, and broad optical transparency (0.22–8 μm) [1,2,3]. Consequently, Y2O3 transparent ceramics are considered ideal candidates for applications in high-power laser systems, high-temperature lens, and infrared windows [4,5]. As a cost-effective alternative to obtain Y2O3 materials with inherent high melting temperature (>2400 °C), the ceramic counterparts can be fabricated under much lower sintering temperature (<1800 °C), meanwhile demonstrating the advantages of composite structure design and volume scalability [6,7]. However, achieving high-quality Y2O3 ceramics remains challenging, with demands to suppress residual pores, exaggerated grain growth, and impurity incorporation (e.g., hydroxyl groups) that degrade optical transparency. Some defects are closely related to the sintering conditions, particularly sintering atmosphere and temperature, that can greatly influence the microstructure evolution and densification process [8,9].
Conventional sintering methods for Y2O3 ceramics typically involve vacuum sintering [10], which can avoid the entrapment of insoluble gas within pores, thereby promoting final full densification. However, during the final-stage sintering of Y2O3 ceramics, accelerated grain boundary mobility can lead to pore–boundary separation, resulting in the formation of intragranular pores that are difficult to remove, even further with pressure-assisted hot isostatic pressing (HIP) sintering [11]. Therefore, it is necessary to control microstructure evolution during the vacuum sintering process. Additionally, it is well known that the grain boundary mobility of Y2O3 ceramics is rate-controlled by yttrium cation interstitial concentrations, which is inversely proportional to the concentration of oxygen interstitials [9,12]. Under an oxygen-rich sintering atmosphere, the concentration of oxygen interstitials in Y2O3 tends to increase, thus inhibiting the abnormal grain growth. Therefore, sintering in an oxygen atmosphere can serve as an effective way to fabricate highly dense Y2O3 transparent ceramics.
In this paper, a systematic comparison was conducted on the effects of vacuum and oxygen pre-sintering on the microstructure and densification behaviors of Y2O3 ceramics. The optical properties, including transmittance and absorption spectra, were compared with different sintering methods. A laser experiment was also conducted on Yb:Y2O3 ceramics, which were pre-sintered under oxygen atmosphere.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Ceramic Fabrication

Y2O3 and 3 at.% Yb:Y2O3 transparent ceramics were prepared by the chemical co-precipitation method. Firstly, commercial high-purity Y2O3 and Yb2O3 powder was used as the raw material. They were dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid solution. According to the chemical formula of Y2O3 and (Yb0.03Y0.97)2O3, the prepared YCl3 and YbCl3 solutions were mixed to make the concentration of Y3+ reach 0.2 mol/L. Next, a mixture of NH4OH and NH4HCO3 was used as the precipitant (with molar concentrations of 1.5 mol/L and 2 mol/L, respectively). The precipitant was sprayed into the mother solutions at a rate of 10 mL/min until the pH value reached 8. The obtained precursors were aged at 15 °C for about 5 h, then filtered and washed 4 times with ultrapure water and 3 times with ethanol to remove reaction by-products. Subsequently, the washed precursors were dried in an oven at 80 °C for about 48 h. Then, they were crushed and calcined in a muffle furnace at 1200 °C/5 h. Then, the obtained Y2O3 and Yb:Y2O3 powders were ball-milled by using a planetary milling machine. Ethanol and ZrO2 balls were used as the ball-milling medium. The solid contents of the slurries were fixed at 11 vol%. The rotational speed of the machine was set to 140 r/min, with a milling duration of 15 h. The resulting slurries were completely dried and sieved through a 100-mesh sieve. The sieved powder was then calcined at 700 °C for 10 h to remove any by-products. The calcined powder was weighed and poured into a mold with a diameter of 22 mm. A uniaxial pressure of 5 MPa was applied and maintained for 5 min. The resulting green compact, formed via dry pressing, was subsequently subjected to cold isostatic pressing at 200 MPa to obtain ceramic green bodies. The green bodies underwent pre-sintering in either oxygen (oxygen purity 99.9%) or vacuum (vacuum degree < 5 × 10−3 Pa) atmospheres. The pre-sintering temperature and duration were 1400–1550 °C and 7 h, respectively. Subsequently, some of the samples were further densified via hot isostatic pressing (HIP) at 198 MPa in an argon atmosphere for 3 h at 1440 °C. After HIP treatment, the samples were annealed in air using a muffle furnace at 1000 °C for 10 h. Finally, the transparent ceramic samples were double-sided polished.

2.2. Characterization

The relative densities of the samples were tested using Archimedes’ method. The microstructures of the sintered ceramics were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-6510, JEOL, Kariya, Japan). Before observation, the samples were mirror polished on the surface and then thermally etched at 1250 °C for 5 h in a muffle furnace. In-line transmittances in the visible to near-infrared wavelength range were measured using a UV–Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Lambda 950, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The measurement wavelength range was from 200 to 2500 nm with a step size of 1 nm. In-line transmittances in the mid-infrared range were measured using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR, TENSOR 27, Bruker, Germany). All the measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 compares the evolution of microstructures in Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperature during the final sintering stage under flowing oxygen and vacuum conditions. Samples sintered in an oxygen atmosphere exhibit smaller average grain sizes and lower porosity compared to those sintered in vacuum at identical temperatures (Figure 1a–d,f–i). Notably, the oxygen-sintered specimens show significantly narrower grain size distributions (Figure 1e,j), which can be attributed to two primary factors. First, the oxygen-rich environment promotes the formation of oxygen interstitials within the crystal lattice, effectively reducing the grain boundary mobility of Y2O3 and thereby suppressing grain growth [12]. Second, the forced convection induced by the flowing gas atmosphere enhances heat transfer efficiency within the furnace chamber. In contrast, vacuum sintering primarily relies on thermal radiation for heat transfer, leading to less efficient temperature distribution. The improved thermal uniformity in oxygen sintering ultimately contributes to a more homogeneous microstructure in the sintered specimens.
Figure 2a compares the evolution of the relative density of Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperature under different sintering atmospheres. When the sintering temperature is below 1430 °C, samples sintered in vacuum exhibit slightly higher relative density than those sintered in an oxygen atmosphere. This can be attributed to the increased concentration of oxygen vacancies in vacuum, which enhances grain boundary diffusion in Y2O3 ceramics, thereby promoting densification during the intermediate stages of sintering. However, during the final stage of sintering, the number of residual pores decreases significantly, leading to a substantial reduction in the pinning effect on grain boundaries. At this stage, the high grain boundary diffusion rate facilitates rapid grain growth, as shown in Figure 2b. As grain growth progresses, residual pores tend to coalesce and migrate along with the grain boundaries, resulting in a gradual decrease in pore number and an increase in pore size, as illustrated in Figure 3. With the continuous increase in pore size, their mobility declines, and they finally become trapped within the rapidly migrating grain boundaries, forming intragranular pores. As shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, Y2O3 ceramics sintered in an oxygen atmosphere exhibit smaller average grain sizes, lower porosity and smaller average pore sizes at the same sintering temperature compared to those sintered in vacuum. This can be attributed to enhanced microstructural uniformity and the suppression of excessive grain growth.
To further eliminate residual pores in Y2O3 ceramics, samples pre-sintered under O2 and vacuum atmospheres were both subjected to hot isostatic pressing. Figure 4 compares the XRD of Y2O3 ceramics that underwent vacuum or oxygen pre-sintering at 1460 °C, followed by HIP at 1440 °C. As shown in Figure 4a, the XRD patterns of the two ceramics correspond to the diffraction peaks of the pure cubic Y2O3 phase (PDF no.74-1828), and no extra impurity peak is found, indicating that the sample does not produce a second phase. As shown in Figure 4b, compared with the vacuum pre-sintering sample, the X-ray diffraction peak of oxygen pre-sintering Y2O3 ceramics moves slightly to the small angle direction. This is because the introduction of oxygen interstitial point defects leads to an increase in the lattice constant of Y2O3, which shows that the X-ray diffraction peak of vacuum pre-sintering Y2O3 ceramics deviates to the small angle direction.
Figure 5 compares the transmittance of Y2O3 ceramics that underwent vacuum or oxygen pre-sintering at 1460 °C, followed by HIP at 1440 °C. Representative sample properties of the transparent Y2O3 ceramics in recent work are also listed in Table 1 for comparison. As shown in Figure 5a, Y2O3 ceramics pre-sintered under both atmospheres exhibit high in-line transmittance in the visible and near-infrared regions (the sample thickness is 4.3 mm). The transmittance exceeds 80% at wavelengths above 700 nm, indicating that the samples pre-sintered in either vacuum or oxygen exhibit good optical quality. However, as seen in Figure 5b, the sample pre-sintered in oxygen exhibits a broad absorption peak in the 2.8–4.1 μm range, which corresponds to the characteristic absorption of hydroxyl groups [13]. This phenomenon indicates that hydroxyl groups in Y2O3 ceramics can only be effectively removed through sintering in a vacuum or a reducing atmosphere. Their resistance to removal at high temperatures under oxygen suggests that hydroxyl groups are not simply present in the form of absorbed water molecules within the Y2O3 green bodies but are chemically bonded to yttrium ions. During high-temperature sintering, the desorption reaction of hydroxyl groups from the material is shown in Reaction (1) [14].
O H + O H O 2 + H 2 O
The above reaction is reversible, which effectively explains why hydroxyl groups cannot be removed even by high-temperature calcination under flowing oxygen conditions. The presence of oxygen molecules increases the concentration of O 2 , which, as a product, drives the reaction in the reverse direction. In contrast, under vacuum conditions, the removal of water vapor products is accelerated, which promotes the reaction to proceed in the forward direction.
To investigate the temperature range at which hydroxyl groups begin to decompose during vacuum sintering, Y2O3 green bodies were subjected to vacuum heat treatment within the temperature range of 600–1460 °C. To prevent moisture absorption, the samples were immediately densified in a flowing oxygen atmosphere at 1460 °C after the respective vacuum heat treatment, ensuring complete closure of the pores. The samples were then subjected to hot isostatic pressing at 1440 °C to achieve full densification. Figure 6 shows the FTIR spectra of the densified Y2O3 samples with different vacuum heat treatment temperatures. It can be observed that after low-temperature (600 °C) vacuum heat treatment, the hydroxyl content in the samples significantly decreased. The above phenomenon indicates that the primary driving force for hydroxyl desorption in Y2O3 green bodies is the rapid removal of water vapor in a vacuum environment, rather than the high-temperature decomposition of Y–OH bonds. This finding provides new insights into the desorption behavior of hydroxyl groups in oxide-based infrared optical materials, offering a potential strategy for controlling hydroxyl-related absorption in similar systems.
Figure 7a illustrates the relationship between the output power and the absorbed pump power for the Yb:Y2O3 ceramic sample pre-sintered in an oxygen atmosphere and further densified by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) in a simple two-mirror laser cavity. Using a fiber coupled semiconductor laser with a central wavelength of 976 nm, the numerical aperture is 0.22, and the fiber diameter is 105 μm. The pump light output from the laser is collimated through lens F1 (focal length f = 50 mm) and then focused into the ceramic gain medium by lens F2 (focal length f = 125 mm). In order to reduce the thermal effect caused by high-power laser pumping, indium foil was used to tightly wrap the laser ceramic and fix it in the copper heat sink, and the cooling water temperature was set at 20 °C. The resonant cavity structure used in this study is a double mirror flat cavity structure. Among them, the planar input mirror M1 is coated with a two-color dielectric film, which has high transmittance (T > 98%) in the pump light band and high reflectivity (R > 99.9%) in the laser band. The output coupling mirror OC is a planar structure [18]. The Yb:Y2O3 ceramic sample had dimensions of 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm and was used without an anti-reflection coating. The threshold absorbed pump powers were 1.5 W, 3.0 W, and 3.0 W with the output couplers (OCs) of 5%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. With a 10% OC, a maximum output power of 12.85 W was achieved at an absorbed pump power of 38.7 W, corresponding to a slope efficiency of 84.4%. The laser efficiency and output power were comparable to those obtained from vacuum-sintered Yb:Y2O3 ceramics [18]. This result indicates that the presence of hydroxyl in Yb:Y2O3 ceramics does not adversely affect laser performance in the 1 μm wavelength range. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that oxygen-atmosphere sintering might be a promising approach for fabricating rare-earth-doped Y2O3 ceramics for laser applications below 2.9 μm wavelengths.

4. Conclusions

This paper investigated the effects of two sintering atmospheres—vacuum and flowing oxygen—on the sintering behavior of Y2O3 ceramics, focusing on densification characteristics and microstructural evolutions. The results indicate that, compared with vacuum sintering, oxygen-atmosphere sintering effectively suppresses grain growth during the final sintering stage and enhances microstructural uniformity. At equivalent sintering densities, oxygen-sintered samples exhibit significantly smaller average grain sizes than those sintered under vacuum. In the 2.8–4.1 μm mid-infrared range, oxygen-sintered samples show distinct hydroxyl absorption peaks. In contrast, vacuum sintering effectively eliminated hydroxyl groups, thereby reducing mid-infrared absorption. Despite the presence of hydroxyl groups, the laser performance of Yb:Y2O3 ceramics densified in an oxygen atmosphere demonstrated comparable laser efficiency and output power in the 1 μm wavelength range, underscoring their potential for laser applications outside the 2.8–4.1 μm absorption regions. In summary, oxygen sintering offers a more cost-effective and scalable route for fabricating laser ceramics, while vacuum sintering is preferable for mid-infrared window applications due to its superior hydroxyl removal and reduced mid-infrared absorption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W., D.X., Y.W. and D.T.; Formal analysis, X.W., D.X., Y.W., J.W., J.M., P.L., J.Z. and D.T.; Investigation, Y.W. and D.T.; Methodology, X.W., D.X., J.W., J.M., P.L. and J.Z.; Supervision, J.M.; Writing—original draft, X.W., D.X., Y.W. and D.T.; Writing—review and editing, X.W., D.X., Y.W., J.W., J.M., P.L., J.Z. and D.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFB3605800); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 62105130, 62475108); the Research Capability Elevation Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2022ZDJS116); the National Science Foundation of Top Talent of SZTU (No. GDRC202302).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Z.; Ikesue, A.; Li, J. Research progress and prospects of rare-earth doped sesquioxide laser ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 3895–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ikesue, A.; Aung, Y.L. Ceramic laser materials. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, C.; Huang, W.; Xie, H.; Wang, F.; Shen, D.; Wang, J.; Zhu, H.; Tang, D. High power and efficient operation of a Ho:Y2O3 ceramic laser with over 210 W of output power at 2.1 µm. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 31407–31414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ning, K.; Wang, J.; Luo, D.; Zhang, J.; Dong, Z.L.; Kong, L.B.; Tang, D.Y. New double-sintering aid for fabrication of highly transparent ytterbium-doped yttria ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eilers, H. Fabrication, optical transmittance, and hardness of IR-transparent ceramics made from nanophase yttria. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 27, 4711–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pirri, A.; Toci, G.; Patrizi, B.; Vannini, M. An overview on Yb-Doped transparent polycrystalline sesquioxide laser ceramics. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2018, 24, 1602108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ding, M.; Li, X.; Wang, F.; Shen, D.; Wang, J.; Tang, D.; Zhu, H. Power scaling of diode-pumped Er:Y2O3 ceramic laser at 2.7 μm. Appl. Phys. Express 2022, 15, 062004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yavetskiy, R.P.; Balabanov, A.E.; Parkhomenko, S.V.; Kryzhanovska, O.S.; Doroshenko, A.G.; Mateychenko, P.V.; Tolmachev, A.V.; Li, J.; Jiang, N.; Gheorghe, L.; et al. Effect of starting materials and sintering temperature on microstructure and optical properties of Y2O3:Yb3+ 5 at% transparent ceramics. J. Adv. Ceram. 2021, 10, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, Y.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Q.; Huang, Z. Sintering of transparent yttria ceramics in oxygen atmosphere. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 2964–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Yu, H.; Pan, W. High performance of La-doped Y2O3 transparent ceramics. J. Adv. Ceram. 2020, 9, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Ni, M.; Lin, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, P.; Xu, X.; Tang, D. High transparency Pr:Y2O3 ceramics: A promising gain medium for red emission solid-state lasers. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 874–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, P.L.; Chen, I.W. Grain boundary mobility in Y2O3: Defect mechanism and dopant effects. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1996, 79, 1801–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seaverson, L.M.; Luo, S.Q.; Chien, P.L.; McClelland, J.F. Carbonate Associated with Hydroxide Sol-Gel Processing of Yttria: An Infrared Spectroscopic Study. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1986, 69, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brindley, G.W.; Nakahira, M. Kinetics of dehydroxylation of kaolinite and halloysite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1957, 40, 346–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, L.; Zhu, Q.; Zhu, Q.; Jiang, B.; Feng, M.; Zhang, L. Fabrication of fine-grained undoped Y2O3 transparent ceramic using nitrate pyrogenation synthesized nanopowders. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 5339–5345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, Q.; Li, J.G.; He, J.; Wang, X.A.; Sun, X. Achieving fabrication of highly transparent Y2O3 ceramics via air pre-sintering by deionization treatment of suspension. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 2689–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Mao, X.; Feng, M.; Xie, J.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L. Optical absorption and mechanism of vacuum-sintered ZrO2-doped Y2O3 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 4181–4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Q.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Ni, M.; Yang, F.; Liu, P.; Lee, K.Y.; Hsiang, H.I.; Shen, D.; Tang, D. Fabrication of high-efficiency Yb:Y2O3 laser ceramics without photodarkening. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 105, 3375–3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The comparisons of microstructures (ad,fi) and grain size distributions (e,j) of Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperature under flowing oxygen and vacuum conditions.
Figure 1. The comparisons of microstructures (ad,fi) and grain size distributions (e,j) of Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperature under flowing oxygen and vacuum conditions.
Ceramics 08 00066 g001
Figure 2. Comparisons of relative densities (a) and average grain sizes (b) of Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperatures under different sintering atmospheres.
Figure 2. Comparisons of relative densities (a) and average grain sizes (b) of Y2O3 ceramics as a function of sintering temperatures under different sintering atmospheres.
Ceramics 08 00066 g002
Figure 3. Variation in pore number density (a) and average pore size (b) with sintering temperature under different sintering atmospheres.
Figure 3. Variation in pore number density (a) and average pore size (b) with sintering temperature under different sintering atmospheres.
Ceramics 08 00066 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of Y2O3 ceramics in different pre-sintering atmospheres in ranges of (a) 10°–90° and (b) 27°–32°.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of Y2O3 ceramics in different pre-sintering atmospheres in ranges of (a) 10°–90° and (b) 27°–32°.
Ceramics 08 00066 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the transmittance of Y2O3 ceramics in the (a) ultraviolet to near-infrared and (b) near-infrared to mid-infrared wavelength ranges after vacuum or oxygen pre-sintering followed by HIP.
Figure 5. Comparison of the transmittance of Y2O3 ceramics in the (a) ultraviolet to near-infrared and (b) near-infrared to mid-infrared wavelength ranges after vacuum or oxygen pre-sintering followed by HIP.
Ceramics 08 00066 g005
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of the densified Y2O3 samples with different vacuum heat treatment temperatures.
Figure 6. FTIR spectra of the densified Y2O3 samples with different vacuum heat treatment temperatures.
Ceramics 08 00066 g006
Figure 7. (a) Laser performance of the Yb:Y2O3 ceramic sample pre-sintered in a flowing oxygen atmosphere and subsequently processed by HIP and (b) typical laser output spectra for different output couplers.
Figure 7. (a) Laser performance of the Yb:Y2O3 ceramic sample pre-sintered in a flowing oxygen atmosphere and subsequently processed by HIP and (b) typical laser output spectra for different output couplers.
Ceramics 08 00066 g007
Table 1. Optical properties of Y2O3 transparent ceramics from the literature and this work.
Table 1. Optical properties of Y2O3 transparent ceramics from the literature and this work.
SampleSintering MethodSintering AdditiveTransmittanceRef.
Y2O3VS + HIPNone83.0%@3–5 μm[15]
Y2O3AS + HIPNone81.8%@800 nm[16]
Y2O3VSZrO280%@3–6 μm[17]
Y2O3OSZrO280%@800 nm[9]
Y2O3VS + HIPNone81.6%@800 nm
84.0%@3.3 μm
This work
Y2O3OS + HIPNone81.9%@800 nm
80.8%@3.3 μm
This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Xing, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Tang, D. Optimizing Sintering Conditions for Y2O3 Ceramics: A Study of Atmosphere-Dependent Microstructural Evolution and Optical Performance. Ceramics 2025, 8, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020066

AMA Style

Wang X, Xing D, Wang Y, Wang J, Ma J, Liu P, Zhang J, Tang D. Optimizing Sintering Conditions for Y2O3 Ceramics: A Study of Atmosphere-Dependent Microstructural Evolution and Optical Performance. Ceramics. 2025; 8(2):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xueer, Dongliang Xing, Ying Wang, Jun Wang, Jie Ma, Peng Liu, Jian Zhang, and Dingyuan Tang. 2025. "Optimizing Sintering Conditions for Y2O3 Ceramics: A Study of Atmosphere-Dependent Microstructural Evolution and Optical Performance" Ceramics 8, no. 2: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020066

APA Style

Wang, X., Xing, D., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Ma, J., Liu, P., Zhang, J., & Tang, D. (2025). Optimizing Sintering Conditions for Y2O3 Ceramics: A Study of Atmosphere-Dependent Microstructural Evolution and Optical Performance. Ceramics, 8(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020066

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop