Previous Article in Journal
Micro-Tomographic Investigation of a North-Western Pacific Polymetallic Nodule
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructural Evolution of Antarctic Ice with the Rising Atmospheric CO2: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis

by
Vuk Uskoković
1,2,3
1
TardigradeNano, 7 Park Vista, Irvine, CA 92604, USA
2
Division of Natural Sciences, Fullerton College, 321 East Chapman Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92832, USA
3
Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, 1 University Drive, Orange, CA 92866, USA
Quaternary 2025, 8(4), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8040057
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 2 October 2025 / Accepted: 16 October 2025 / Published: 21 October 2025

Abstract

Antarctica, largely free from geopolitical borders, serves as a critical site for scientific research, environmental monitoring and climate studies. The continent’s ice cap holds over 60% of the Earth’s freshwater and provides a stable climatological record spanning 800,000 years. In this study, the relationship between changes in atmospheric CO2 levels over the past century and the microstructural characteristics of Antarctic ice was investigated. While it is well-documented that CO2 fluctuations have driven the periodic expansion and retreat of ice sheets, no research to this day has explored how variations in CO2 concentrations influence the physical integrity of ice at the microscopic scale. To address this, grain size, anisotropy, irregularity, and solidity of surface and near-surface ice samples collected over the past 70 years were analyzed. These microstructural features were compared against historical atmospheric greenhouse gas data from multiple Antarctic research stations, including records from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition, and the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. Results reveal a correlation between rising CO2 levels and changes in ice microstructure, particularly an increase in the grain size as well as the reduction in the grain aspect ratio and in the morphological solidity. The study remains limited by significant sources of variability, including differences in sampling depths, geographical locations, seasonal effects, and inconsistencies in analytical tools and methodologies reported across the literature. Despite these limitations, this proof-of-concept study elicits the need for continued meta-analyses of existing climate datasets. Such efforts could provide deeper insights into the role of greenhouse gas concentrations in defining the microstructural stability of Antarctic ice, which is critical for predicting ice sheet integrity and its contribution to sea level rise.

1. Introduction

Antarctica is the only continent on Earth that can be considered, with some degree of reservation [1,2], freed from classical geopolitical borders [3]. Albeit mainly uninhabited, hostile in terms of environmental conditions and nearly impossible to support self-sustained communities, Antarctica, like the planetary oceans and outer space, symbolizes a place belonging to every earthling equally. The 14-article Antarctic Treaty, signed on 1 December 1959 by a dozen countries [4], independently of the United Nations, ensures that this continent is used only for the promotion of peace, environmental protection and, perhaps most importantly of all, scientific research. In fact, scientific research presents the main and oftentimes the only reason over 30 different countries cited as the one justifying their presence on this 14.2 million km2 large continent [5]. Antarctica, in fact, houses hundreds of continuously active measurement stations, which produce data that are freely accessible, both historically and in real-time, through various online platforms and databases.
Most notably, the research conducted in Antarctica in the early 1980s led to the discovery of the ozone hole [6] and to the subsequent ban on the production and use of chlorofluorocarbons as refrigerants, which to this day represents the single greatest story on how environmental science can correct harmful industrial actions and restore damage made inadvertently to the planet by anthropogenic activities. Because Antarctica, despite being the largest desert on Earth, holds over 60% of the Earth’s fresh water in the solid form and is also the fastest warming continent, it presents a site necessary to monitor for ice sheet disintegration to ensure that catastrophic scenarios entailing the melting of this polar cap are averted. It has been estimated that the complete melting of the ice in Antarctica, which, on average covers the 14.2 million km2 continent with a 1.2 mile thick ice sheet, would raise the sea level by around 60 meters [7], which would necessitate the displacement of one quarter of the Earth’s human population. Some of the global temperature increase induced by the melting of this ice and the consequent intensification of the greenhouse effect will be mitigated by the enhanced precipitation rate—predominantly around the coastal areas because their orographic obstruction would force the incoming winds to liberate the moisture concentrated around the most quickly warmed periphery of the continent—but this compensation effect is expected to be only partial [8].
On top of this, importantly, the Antarctic ice cap contains the most stable record of the Earth’s climatological past. The ice sheet reaching thicknesses of nearly 3 miles in some areas of the continent traps gases present in the geological eras in which the ice was deposited, acting as the most reliable climate change record of all. This record extends 800,000 years into the past [9], roughly a thousand years for the first 100 meters into the depth, before beginning to gradually lessen the slope and partially plateau [10]. The European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) has managed to deduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations for the last 800,000 years based on the concentrations of this gas trapped at different depths of the ice cap and, importantly, show that atmospheric CO2 levels of today are higher than they have ever been in the last 800,000 years [11].
It is widely known that variations in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere have caused the periodic retreat and expansion of the Antarctic ice cap [12]. However, it has been seldom, if at all, inquired as to how changes in the environmental concentrations of CO2 can affect the microstructural characteristics of ice. Critically, any weakening of ice caused by the disruption of its microstructural integrity can increase its propensity for melting and for the collapse of glaciers. As ice sheets fracture and split into multiple chunks, the greater degree of their volume becomes exposed to water, speeding up the retreat of the polar cap, raising the sea water level, reducing the reflectiveness of sunlight back into space and further contributing to global warming. The relationship between the alteration of the surface ice on Antarctica and the change in the CO2 atmospheric levels in the last century, to this author’s knowledge, has not been studied nor confirmed yet. This is where we arrive at the objective of this study, which is to assess and quantify ice crystal characteristics such as grain size, grain anisotropy, grain morphology irregularity and grain solidity as a function of the date when the samples were collected and compare them with the annual meteorological data on the atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases over Antarctica in the past 70 years, as reported by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition and the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Monitoring Laboratory, searching for a possible correlation.
We, as the scientific community, have reached a stage where new data generation has far exceeded the ability to analyze and make sense of the given data, especially when it comes to infinitely numerous correlations that could be potentially established within such rapidly expanding datasets. This is why meta-studies, in which analyses of data collected by different research groups at different locations and different times are carried out, are now more important than ever [13,14,15]. In this study, one such meta approach was pursued, as data acquired by different research teams in the last 70 years were compared against data produced by three of the many continuously operating international measurement stations scattered across Antarctica. Eventually, it is shown that there is a direct correlation between the microstructural characteristics of ice in the shallow layers of the Antarctic ice cap and the rapidly increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, primarily CO2, across Antarctica in the given period of time.

2. Methods

Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere over Antarctica were obtained from the publicly available results of the CO2 measurement station at the South Pole (90°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W) and reported by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography [16] (Figure 1a). The data points correspond to monthly averages and date back to 1957. Meanwhile, concentrations of carbon monoxide (Figure 1b) and methane (Figure 1c) in the air over Antarctica have been measured since 1993 and 1986, respectively, at the Syowa station (69°0′15′′ S 39°34′55′′ E) by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition. Lastly, monthly averages of nitrous oxide (Figure 1d), yet another greenhouse gas, have been measured since 1997 at the South Pole by the US NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. The trends measured in Antarctica since 1957 mirror the global trends with respect to all the greenhouse gases considered here.
Four distinct determinants of the microstructure of surface and near-surface ice in Antarctica were chosen for the analysis: grain size, grain anisotropy, morphological irregularity and solidity. According to the Hall-Petch relationship, grain size is an essential factor defining the strength of ice and solid materials in general [17]. Reduced grain size, for example, leads to increased concentration of dislocations, which in the ductile regime act as obstacles to the movement of crystallites, resisting plastic deformation or fracture, whereas in the brittle regime they hinder the propagation path of cracks and cleavages, increasing, as a result, both the compressive [18] and the tensile [19] strength of ice. In addition, grain size affects the optical properties of ice, which determine how much sunlight the ice will trap and/or reflect. For example, by exerting an effect on the ratio between absorption and scattering, grain growth has been directly associated with reduced albedo, especially at near-infrared wavelengths [20,21]. Moreover, enlargement of the grains of ice decreases the spectral extinction coefficient and increases the shortwave radiation penetration [22], explaining why sunlight penetration is greater in coarse-grained ice and firn than in fine-grained snow [23]. At the same time, because of the greater exposed surface, finer grains generally tend to exhibit a greater solubility. Permeability to water, the inflow of which is intimately associated with melting, for example, is inversely proportional to the grain size of ice [24].
The aspect ratio as the measure of geometric anisotropy and the degree of elongation of grains is another important factor, first because it determines the density of packing [25] and, thus, the strength of ice, but also because it has an intrinsic effect on the optical properties. Namely, the optically effective grain radius is proportional to 3V/S, where V/S is the volume-to-surface ratio, the reason being that the ratio of absorption to scattering is a function of the average distance the photons must traverse through the ice between successive opportunities for scattering at the air-crystal interface [26], which is markedly different for two samples with an identical average grain size but different grain aspect ratios. This effectively means that a sample of ice determined to have the grain size of, say, 5 mm as its longest dimension during microscopic analyses or by sieving might have the optically effective grain diameter of a fraction of a millimeter if it only happened that the grains are plate-shaped.
The third morphological characteristic analyzed is shape irregularity, which is expressed here as the inverse of circularity. This irregularity, correspondingly, expresses the degree to which the elementary unit of snow, namely an ice crystallite, deviates from circle as the perfect geometric shape. Grains possessing uneven edges, indentations or protrusions would, according to this measure, have a high level of morphological irregularity. For the fourth and the final microstructural characteristic analyzed, triple junction angle was the first candidate, given that this structural feature has been shown to influence climate signal preservation in polar ice [27]. Moreover, many impurities, such as sulfuric acid, were shown to segregate at triple junctions of Antarctic ice [28], potentially affecting its solubility. However, since it was imperative that the focus here be on recent icy precipitates, for which dense packing of grains is a rare phenomenon, this parameter had to be discarded. Instead, solidity of grains, as another morphological metric, was instated. Unlike extent, which is defined as the area occupied by the grain divided by the smallest rectangle fitting it, solidity, also known as compactness, equals the area occupied by the grain divided by the convex hull area. Solidity can be perceived as one of many possible geometric measures of structural order embodied by a particle.
The literature sources from which the information on one or more of these four characteristics was reported or where data were reported, such as optical or electron micrographs, from which these four characteristics could be calculated are listed in Table 1. To deduce parameters such as grain aspect ratio, circularity or solidity, image processing was carried out in ImageJ 1.53k (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). In some cases, other physical properties were used to derive the grain size, two of which were air permeability and specific surface area, which can be used to deduce the particle diameter given the known porosity, P, and particle sphericity, φ, using the following equations [29]:
k   =   1 150 P 3 ( 1 P ) 2 ( Φ d ) 2 μ
S = 6 ( 1 P ) ρ d
k = 1 4.17 μ P 3 ( S ρ ) 2
where k is the air permeability [(m/s)/(Pa/m)], S the specific surface area (m2/kg), ρ the snow density (kg/m3), d the particle diameter [m], and μ the viscosity of air (1.67 × 10−5 N·s/m2 at −10 °C). Plotting of the microstructural data points as the function of the time of sampling was performed in Origin Pro 8.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA). Linear regression fits and corresponding ANOVA statistical analyses were performed in the same software package. To calculate p-values, GraphPad 10.6.1 software (Dotmatics, San Diego, CA, USA) was used in conjunction with Microsoft Excel 2016.
The search for literature sources proceeded manually, using various combinations of keywords such as “ice”, “snow”, “crystal”, “grain”, and “Antarctica”. The keywords were inputted in scientific paper databases including Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Every journal article, preprint, technical report and academic thesis that satisfied these keywords was downloaded, read by the author and manually extracted for relevant parameters descriptive of the microstructure of ice. Every source reporting directly or indirectly on any of the four microstructural characteristics of interest at acceptable locations and depths of the ice cap was ascribed an equal level of reliability and used as such. No assistance by any computational algorithms in detection and extraction of relevant data was used. Neither was any assistance of this kind utilized in the data processing, interpretation or presentation phases of this purely curiosity-driven project. Concretely, no computer models, including generative AI algorithms, were used as an aid in conceptualization, data mining, collection, analysis, interpretation, visualization or writing stages of this study.

3. Results

According to the global trends in concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases, the levels of CO2, CH4 and N2O have been continuously on the rise since the mid-20th century [88]. In contrast, the concentration of CO has been spiking sporadically, but also regionally, being tied to local sources of pollution, explaining four orders of magnitude lower concentrations of this gas compared to CO2 over Antarctica (Figure 1). Unlike CO2, which is atmospherically stable, CO is significantly more short-lived, as it tends to recombine with hydroxyl radicals abundant in regions of high water vapor and form CO2, having lifespan of 1 to 3 months on average, as compared to the order of hundreds of years for a single CO2 molecule [89]. In addition to this, CO2 is also 50 times more soluble in water than CO (1.3 mg/g vs. 0.027 mg/g at 20 °C), which is another reason why the effect of CO2 on crystallization of ice is expected to be significantly higher than that of CO, even at hypothetically identical exposures. Overall, out of these four correlations established between concentrations of greenhouse gases over Antarctica and time, three demonstrate a definite monotonous trend (CO2, CH4, N2O), while one represents a completely random scatter (CO). When searching for trends at the level of grain microstructure, these two disparate categories of cases present guidance as to how an ideal correlation and a complete lack thereof would look like.
Changes in microstructural parameters descriptive of the size and morphology of ice crystals over the past 70 years, as established through the analysis reported here, are shown in Figure 2. The strongest correlation among the four parameters analyzed was for the grain size of surface or near-surface ice as the function of time of its sampling between 1961 and 2020. The grain size, namely, is shown to have been steadily increasing throughout the given period of time (Figure 2a). Averaging at around 0.22, 0.50 and 0.90 mm in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, respectively, it rose to 1.27, 1.08 and 1.46 mm in the 1990s, 2000s and 2010s (Figure 2b). Or, put differently, the grain size rose from an average of 0.57 mm in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s combined to 1.29 mm in the period extending from 1990 to date. In contrast to the grain size, which increased over time, the grain aspect ratio (Figure 2c) and the grain solidity (Figure 2g) decreased. The magnitude of these changes was similar for the grain size and the aspect ratio, as illustrated by similar slopes of these values as functions of time, namely 0.024 ± 0.008 and −0.015 ± 0.006, respectively. Or, more specifically, the grain aspect ratio decreased from 2.27 in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s combined to 2.00 in the 1990s to 1.72 in the 21st century (Figure 2d). The change of the grain solidity, on the other hand, was much less pronounced, given an order of magnitude lower slope of −0.001700 ± 0.000007. Meanwhile, the inverse of circularity as a measure of grain irregularity preserved near constancy throughout the six decades analyzed, decreasing to an insignificant extent (Figure 2e), with the slope of −3.079 × 10−4 ± 0.003 × 10−4 and the caveat that two notable waves were discerned, one peaking in the 1960s and another in the 1990s (Figure 2f), both of which were followed by two decades long periods when the circularity of detected grains was significantly higher. In all, although nothing can be concluded about causation in the relationship between (i) the steady rise of atmospheric CO2 (Figure 1a) and two other greenhouse gases analyzed, namely methane (Figure 1c) and nitric oxide (Figure 1d), and (ii) the changes in primarily the grain size (Figure 2a) and the aspect ratio (Figure 2c), but also to some extent the grain solidity (Figure 2g), there exists a clear correlation between them.
From the statistical standpoint, the linear regressions of the four trends analyzed yielded distinct significance regimes, with the Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.34657 and adjusted R-square value of 0.10402 measured for the grain size fit; −0.32448 and 0.08398 for the aspect ratio fit; −0.01666 and −0.02829 for the inverse circularity fit; and −0.3474 and 0.09556 for the solidity fit. These weak to moderate levels of strength and direction of the linear relationship between the variables, however, become offset by the comparatively large sample sizes. Correspondingly, given the F value of 7.50806, DFn (number of predictors) of 1 and DFd (residual degrees of freedom) of 55, the p value, derived from the ANOVA F-test, for the grain size linear regression fit was calculated to be 0.0083, which is in the range of considerable statistical significance. As for the aspect ratio linear regression, with the F value of 4.94241, DFn of 1 and DFd of 42, the p value, derived from the ANOVA F-test, was calculated to be 0.0316, which is in the range of conventional statistical significance. As for the inverse circularity linear regression, with the F value of 0.00972, DFn of 1 and DFd of 35, the p value, derived from the ANOVA F-test, was calculated to be 0.9920, which is considered not to be statistically significant. And lastly, for the solidity linear regression, with the F value of 4.80365, DFn of 1 and DFd of 35, the p value, derived from the ANOVA F-test, was calculated to be 0.0351, which is, as in the case of the trend in the grain aspect ratio, in the range of conventional statistical significance. These results attest to the statistical reliability of the trends observed here, especially for the grain size (p < 0.01), but also for the grain solidity (p < 0.05) and the grain aspect ratio (p < 0.05). In contrast, no change in the inverse of circularity (p = 0.99) can be pinpointed, neither by naked eye observations nor the ensuing statistics.

4. Discussion

4.1. Mechanism and Implications

If the correlation between (i) the steadily rising atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, both globally and over Antarctica (Figure 1), and (ii) the increase in the grain size (Figure 2a,b) and the decrease in the aspect ratio (Figure 2c,d) and solidity (Figure 2g,h) of surface and near-surface ice in Antarctica during the six decades analyzed here does amount to causation, it is worth discussing the possible mechanistic aspects of it and environmental consequences. The results presented in this study stem from an unbiased quantitative analysis of data extracted from a variety of literature reports; however, to provide a deeper exploration of potential mechanisms underlying the observed correlations, it is imperative that the discussion delves sporadically into speculative territories. This speculative aspect is an intentional effort to stimulate further investigation and enrich the understanding of evidently complex relationships at work, even as these interpretations remain subject to additional validation.
Initially, it was hypothesized that if increased levels of CO2 are able to affect the crystallinity of ice, the effect should be destructive. From the materials chemistry standpoint, CO2 can disrupt the crystallization of ice by weakening the hydrogen bonds between water molecules within the ice crystal structure, leading to a less robust ice with increased susceptibility to fracture and melting. Essentially, CO2 may be expected to make ice weaker and more prone to breaking apart, especially when present in significant quantities within the ice matrix. Simulations, for example, have shown that ice that has been infiltrated with CO2 to the point when the gas occupies 2% of its volume is roughly 38% less strong than CO2-free ice [90]. Also, when CO2 is trapped as gas bubbles within ice, these bubbles can act as nucleation sites for further ice crystal formation, potentially affecting the crystal morphology. Segregating along triple junctions and other grain boundary regions, bubbles, moreover, act as pinning points [91], impeding the propagation of dislocations and hindering the grain growth during crystallization. Hence, one of the starting hypotheses was that more CO2 in the atmosphere would cause ice grains to be smaller and also more disordered. Carbon dioxide gas inclusion during freezing of water [92] and a range of different aqueous systems [93,94,95], further, has been shown to reduce supercooling required for nucleation to occur, presumably because of the ability of the bubbles or the gas–liquid interface to act as a surface promoting heterogeneous nucleation [96]. As a result of this, it has become a regular practice in the food industry to add CO2 gas bubbles to promote freezing of a range of items, including, most notably, ice cream [97]. Given the inverse relationship between the nucleation rate and the grain size [98], this nucleation-promoting effect of CO2, as it was initially hypothesized, should further contribute to the diminishment of the crystallinity of ice.
An additional factor is the effect of CO2 dissolved in the form of carbonate, HxCO3x−2 (x = 0 or 1) ions. Although ocean waters bordering Antarctica have exhibited stable alkalinity and concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon, both averaging at around 2100 ppm [99], since 1993, crystallization of water that gets deposited in the solid form over the ice caps begins in the air, which does not have the buffering capacity of oceans. Even though crystallization of ice proceeds via condensation [100], not precipitation, the effects of CO2 in the air and carbonate species present within the pockets of liquid water trapped on the surface and in the interior of the snowflakes, the firn and the ice on their crystallization and metamorphism must be pronounced. In general, by altering speciation, interfacial layer composition and intermolecular bonding, reduction in the pH of a solution containing crystal growth units can have a dramatic effect on the crystallization reaction. Morphology and other microstructural parameters of a range of different materials oftentimes dramatically change in response to changes in the pH of the solution during their synthesis [101,102,103,104]. Properties of materials fabricated under such different pH conditions can also be subject to considerable changes, as exemplified by the case where pH was able to control the diameter of heterostructured Pd/PdO nanowires [105] and, in consequence, their capacity for the electroreduction of CO2. As for pure water, increasing the ionic strength of water suppresses its freezing point, making such ice, conversely, more prone to melting relative to pure water. All these arguments suggest that the elevated global concentrations of CO2 should have a definite effect on the crystallization of ice in Antarctica. Even at moderate concentration changes as those observed in the past 100 years atmospherically, amounting to circa 130 ppm [106], the effect of these changes on the microstructure of ice and its physicochemical stability might be significant.
The idea that CO2 might make ice grains smaller by interfering with hydrogen bonding, however, is not supported given the evidenced increase in the size of ice grains paralleling the increase in the atmospheric concentration of CO2 and two other greenhouse gases over Antarctica. Moreover, the fact that the increase in the grain size was paralleled by a drop in the solidity of the grains and in their aspect ratio suggests that the crystal growth proceeded more hastily than normally. A speedier growth at a steady nucleation rate typically produces larger crystals with a less refined morphology, which in this case corresponds to more isotropic, rounded shapes in lieu of elongated ones. Simultaneously, the solidity of shapes becomes sacrificed due to the greater degree of stochastics governing crystal growth and transformations. This accelerated growth effect is supposed to be exhibited in the formative stages in the lifetime of a snow crystal, in the air, although the possibility of metamorphic effects on the icy Antarctic floor cannot be discarded either.
Because of the comparatively dry air in which they form, snow crystals in Antarctica grow slower and into lower sizes than elsewhere on the globe [107]. Snow crystals forming under such conditions are typically prismatic, whereas an accelerated growth promotes dendritic branching and the rise of more isotropic or even plate-like morphologies. The latter type of crystals is usually found in climates more humid and hospitable than in Antarctica, and can have as much as a couple of millimeters in length. If CO2 does affect ice crystal growth, the effect can be direct or indirect. For example, CO2 has warmed the atmosphere, but higher temperatures typically slow down the ice crystal growth and may be expected to lead to a more controlled, uniaxial growth and a lesser degree of branching. Water, however, is anomalous at innumerable levels and its crystallization by condensation partly disobeys these common principles. In fact, according to the snowflake morphology diagram first constructed in the 1930s by Nakaya [108], prismatic crystals forming at very low temperatures and low humidities, such as those typifying the air over Antarctica may transition to flatter and larger prisms or platelets as temperature increases, only at even higher temperatures to revert to extreme uniaxial morphologies [109]. Further, if dislocations and other lattice defects pose a critical limit with regard to how large crystals can grow, then even slightly elevated temperatures may lead to a more controlled growth, producing a lesser concentration of defects and allowing the crystals to grow to effectively larger sizes. Higher temperatures, moreover, can promote partial melting of snowflakes as they fall through the air, which would round the icy particles and make them more prone to metamorphosis and sintering on the ground. CO2 can also affect the airborne moisture by trapping heat and increasing water evaporation, which is another means by which this gas can accelerate the growth of ice crystals in the air. As for direct effects, they are less likely, especially given the generally detrimental effect of CO2 on formation of particles via condensation [110]. CO2, specifically, introduces stochastic disorder in the supersaturation distribution of water vapor by altering thermal and mass diffusivities of the molecular growth units. This effect can explain the rounding and loss of solidity of particles, but not the enhanced growth of crystalline grains, which is why indirect effects are most likely to be responsible for the observed changes in the grain size and other morphological parameters.
The environmental repercussions of the microstructural effects reported here can be considerable. If CO2 induces the enlargement of the ice crystals, it also renders them less soluble, simply because solubility of ice and materials in general—like many forms of their physicochemical reactivity as well—is proportional to their surface-to-volume ratio. If so, then elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2 may halt the melting of the Antarctic ice cap and achieve a similar mitigation of Earth’s climatic imbalances as that seen at work when excess CO2 in the air is consumed by plants, fostering their growth and producing, via photosynthesis, more oxygen.
The opposite scenario, however, is more probable if the effect of the enlargement of crystalline grains of ice on the optical properties of polar snow is considered. Coarser ice grains, namely, exhibit reduced albedo and are more prone to absorb sunlight radiation and undergo melting. If the optical effects prove to be more decisive than the solubility effects, then the destabilization of the system may occur, where the increased concentrations of CO2 would make ice more prone to melting due to its indirect effect on the microstructure of ice, whereas the melting of this coarser snow would expose the underlying firn and ice with an even lower albedo and even coarser grains, leading to a potential runaway effect and even faster disappearance of the polar ice cap than that evident today [111]. Additionally, some element of disorder introduced to the microstructure of ice, evident from the reductions in solidity and morphological anisotropy, may also be a factor facilitating the weakening of ice and its propensity for melting. As it frequently happens during analyses of environmental effects, the nonlinear, autopoietic, feedback-looped complexity of the biosphere ensures that any conclusions pertaining to the global effects of certain chemicals, procedures or events remain ambiguous.

4.2. Study Justification and Limitations

Crystallization of water in even the most controlled laboratory environments presents an extraordinarily complex physicochemical phenomenon from which a number of anomalies emanate [112]. When this phase transition occurs via condensation of water vapor in the troposphere and crystallization and recrystallization continue as the snowflakes fall through the air and for years after they touch the ground, transitioning to loose firn first and then to increasingly compact and pore-free ice, then a number of chemical and environmental factors come to influence the outcome of this process, complicating any effort to establish a correlation between the final product and any given parameters affecting this process. Because of this interplay of a variety of factors determining the morphology of surface and near-surface ice crystals, it is logical that the correlations applying to this morphology and shown in Figure 2 are nowhere as clean as those applying to greenhouse gases over Antarctica and presented in Figure 1. Still, the assumption underscoring this study was that if a large enough dataset was collected from all the possible literature sources since the microstructural parameters of snow and ice had begun to be measured with a sophisticated level of precision, some correlation might be possible to obtain. To minimize this rather large range of variability, a number of prerequisites were implemented in the data selection stage, including, most critically, the depth from which ice samples were retrieved, which was limited in all but seven cases—in which it was either indicated that the morphology was highly similar to that of the near-surface deposits or data were extrapolated with a reasonable degree of confidence to the surface level—to less than 60 cm. The grain size of ice increases steadily with depth due to sintering [113], at the reported rate of ~3 mm per year [114], while the microstructure of ice grains at different depths of the Antarctic ice cap reflects the climatological characteristics of the geological eras in which they formed. For example, the size of grains comprising glacial ice is lower than that comprising interglacial ice [115,116], possibly because of the effects impurities and soluble shape modifiers exerted by dragging and pinning at the grain boundaries during crystal growth [117,118]. To reduce this depth effect, the only information used in the data collection stage was that on crystals of snow or firn sampled from depths lower than 60 cm or those whose size could be confidently extrapolated down to the surface value.
Sampling out surface or near-surface Antarctic ice, however, comes with challenges that extend beyond the logistical and operational and into the basic scientific. First, it is known that Antarctic glaciochemistry exhibits a very broad seasonal variability [119,120,121], for which reason it is recommended that any analyses utilize annual or multi-year averages, if not specifically and systematically dated for seasonal investigations. Also, the distance from the ocean is a pronounced determinant of the ionic content in the ice, which itself is a strong determinant of the ice crystal forms, but so is the elevation. Hence, as one moves inland across the Antarctic Peninsula towards the Ronne Ice Shelf in West Antarctica or from the coast of Mirnyy in East Antarctica deeper into the Wilhelm II Land, the concentrations of sodium and chloride in ice decrease and increase, respectively, within the rather broad, 5 to 15,000 ppb range [122]. At the same time, as elevation from which the surface snow is sampled increases, the concentration of both of these ions drop, unlike that of species such as sulfate, sulfonate or nitrate, simply because the deposition of the ice crystals at low elevations, near the sea level, occurs in the presence of sea salt, with insignificant aerosol loss or accretion in the post-depositional stage. Because of this interplay of mutually dependent variables, the net result of the two effects is difficult to predict. Multi-year analyses, like the one employed here, while challenging, can help mitigate these complexities by averaging out seasonal and spatial variations, providing conditions for a more robust assessment of long-term trends.
Literature sources in this meta-analysis were broadly distributed, covering all relevant reports published in the period from the mid-1950s to today. Additionally, climate conditions represent the key determinants of the size and shape of the initially formed snow crystals [123]. Therefore, to minimize seasonal variability, mostly samples collected during the austral summers were considered and only occasionally those acquired at springtime. Although one study concluded that the difference between precipitation and evaporation is between 100 and 200 mm for every month in Antarctica [124], and another study found that there is twice more precipitation in the snowiest month of June than in the least snowy month of December, there is still over 15 mm/month precipitation in the latter month [125,126], meaning that there is snow falling on Antarctica all year around, despite the fact that the net annual amount of precipitation is still within the domain of deserts on Earth. Still, the average air temperature changes with season, and temperature at the time of snow formation is usually determined by measuring the isotope ratios of HD16O and H218O relative to H216O as proxies. The effect of the temperature gradient on snow fabric evolution is considerable [127,128] and can affect the distribution between the growths along the basal plane and along the prismatic plane, where the former drives the grains toward plate-shaped forms while the latter fosters the formation of columnar crystals. How significant these morphological differences are for the mechanical strength of ice is probably best illustrated by the fact that non-basal deformation of ice crystals, paralleling the prismatic or the pyramidal faces, requires a stress at least 60 times greater than that needed to induce a basal slip at the same strain rate [129], exemplifying a case of extreme mechanical anisotropy. The evidence that ground temperature changes responsible for crystal transformations commencing as soon as snowflakes touch the ground are not trivial comes from the fact that the snow temperature at the depth of 0.1 m is more or less constant from the beginning of May to mid-October, averaging at around −65 °C, but then increasing to reach its peak of circa −35 °C in mid to late January, after which it begins to drop again [130]. The approach pursued here is supported by prior studies performed in Antarctica [29], which have shown that neither density nor specific surface area of snow change consistently with temperature, meaning that the change in these properties with the first meter of depth is minimal and negligible. In addition, the strong winds over Antarctica ensure that diffusive mixing prevails over temperature effects on the microstructural parameters of snow [131], given that some snowflakes can cross vast distances from the point of their nucleation until they deposit on the ground [132], whereas vertical or even nearly vertical precipitation is very rare. Nevertheless, mostly samples of snow from depths lower than 60 cm were considered in the analyses, which can be higher [133] or within [134] the range of the measured thickness of snow in Antarctica, below which layers of firn and the glacial ice reside.
Humidity is another factor that can greatly influence the morphology of ice crystals, especially because these crystals are produced via condensation of water moisture, not precipitation from supersaturated and/or supercooled aqueous solutions. The higher moisture over the Arctic than over Antarctica explains the considerably larger size of crystallites forming snow and, eventually, ice in the Arctic than in Antarctica. In fact, when the first polar ice crystal size analyses were conducted, in the 1950s and the early 1960s, this discrepancy was obvious and compared to 0.902 mm obtained for the average grain size of the surface ice by, for example, Schwarzacher between 1955 and 1958 in the Arctic Ocean [135], Paige obtained a little over twice less, 0.4 mm, in McMurdo Sound in Antarctica in 1965 and 1966 [86]. On the other hand, because of the extreme drought and overall desert-like conditions present in Antarctica, the moisture demonstrates minimal seasonal or month-to-month variations, in the range between 61 and 67% for every month of the year [136,137], which is a positive factor facilitating the validity of the approach pursued in this study.
The fluffy crystals of ice, as they get deposited as snowfall onto the Antarctic permafrost, undergo various forms of metamorphism. One of them is equithermal, typically driven by wind that rolls the crystalline grains, smoothens and rounds them into a wind slab (hence also called destructive metamorphism), building the bonding and increasing the strength of the material. Another type of metamorphism is temperature-gradient, where the insulating effect of the snow cover creates a positive temperature gradient proportional to the depth [138] and drives the upward convection of water vapor through the snowpack. Notably, this gradient is present only in the winter, when the ice caps grow, whereas in the summer, the gradient is negative, and in spring and autumn it can be absent [131]. Another factor driving this upward transport of water vapor may come from the theory distilled by Jožef Stefan as he studied phase transitions with moving boundaries in the context of crystallization of ice and remarked that the heat released by the exothermic recrystallization of ice in deep columns is being conducted completely through the ice and to the atmosphere [139], given the inability of ice to store heat [140]. These conditions favor crystal enlargement—hence also called constructive metamorphism—and the formation of more angular and faceted crystals. Here, pressure sintering and dislocation creep act as two dominant mechanisms of densification [141], which is also facilitated by the presence of quasi-liquid water lining up grain boundaries even in the densest and purest ice, explaining its perpetual slipperiness and stemming from the reduced hydrogen bonding by molecules at this interface, which induces molecular anharmonicity [142]. Thus, crystal anisotropy and overall morphology can significantly vary depending on the time of sampling, even for recent, relatively fresh snow. In addition, five out of six different types of snow in a single sample, namely new snow, recent snow, soft-moderate slab, hard slab and melt-grain clusters, usually have identical or nearly identical grain sizes—that is, all except depth hoar [64]. Additionally, for most ice columns, the average grain size remains more or less constant, in the 1—4 mm2 range for the first kilometer of depth, after which it gradually increases, reaching values higher than 50 mm2 at depths greater than 3 km [143]. Altitude, interestingly, does not present a critical factor, given that the mean thickness of unit layers within the upper 100 cm depth of surface snow is the same [144] at every altitude between 1000 and 4000 m, with no trend in this function being delineable.
Despite this, only surface and near-surface icy deposits were included in the analyses. Inclusion of ice core data would be impractical as such data would be difficult to relate to crystals precipitated in the past 60 years because of the considerable age discrepancy. For example, as one moves from moister west Antarctica to drier east Antarctica, the depth at which firn transforms to glacier ice shifts from two and three orders of magnitude in age, that is, from 10 to nearly 100 meters, which corresponds to deposition events within the window of between 100 and up to 2000 years. As for firn, the layer sandwiched between the surface snow and the deep ice, representing solid water with a slightly higher porosity than that of ice (20–30% vs. 20%, respectively), the structural changes it undergoes over time are also dependent on the local weather patterns, latitude and altitude. Effectively, this has left only the surface and subsurface snow, the least rigorously studied of all forms of solid water in Antarctica, with the porosity of typically 90%, to be assessed. For this reason, studies with multiple drilling sites were considered ideal as they allowed for averages to be derived and geographical location as a variable be minimized.
Another source of error must have come from the variability of methods used to measure the grain dimensions. Very often, especially in studies predating the use of low-temperature scanning electron microscopes [145], first used in the mid-1980s to analyze ice from Antarctica [146], the resolving power of the magnifying devices was insufficient to cover the entire distribution of grains and some grain sizes are likely to have been left undetected. Such was the case, for example, with a study where a videocassette recorder device coupled to a 640 × 480 pixel camera was used to measure the particle size [73]. One would expect that the advent of techniques for visualization of microscopic matter with an ever finer resolution during the six decades encompassed by this study would create an obvious artifice in terms of a consistent reduction in the grain size detected over time, and yet the fact that the exact opposite was the case implicitly supports the validity of the findings presented here. In addition, early observations of Antarctic snow crystals conducted in the 1960s and early 1970s primarily focused on intriguingly long crystals of bullet-like and prism-like shapes, which would be another factor pushing the grain sizes to the higher end at the earliest time points covered by this study. In spite of this, these early temporal segments were characterized by the lowest grain sizes detected, indirectly validating the observed trends. In addition, global air pollution caused by the airborne particulate matter has been mostly on the rise throughout the last century [147] and is expected to have led to an increasing concentration of impurities in the Antarctic snow. These impurities are known to be present in polar ice [148], where they act as impediments to the grain boundary propagation during crystal growth [149], thus reducing the crystallinity of the material. However, as with the progress in analytics, the expected effect, namely the reduced grain size over time, is opposite from the observed, suggesting that it may not be present, let alone be decisive.
In the end, it cannot be overstated how the correlations derived here are subject to massive amounts of uncertainty. Given the immense variability of environmental conditions under which ice forms, observing the effects of comparatively subtle physical and chemical changes in the gaseous content of the atmosphere from which ice crystallizes and of metamorphic transformations it undergoes when brought into contact with the permafrost requires rigorous statistical analyses of very large sets of data. With the aid of more advanced computational methods and perhaps even artificial neural networks for processing, far larger datasets, possibly including the totality of all available publicly presented scientific information on snow and ice in Antarctica and in other arctic zones to date, could be analyzed, yielding more statistically reliable inferences than those of comparatively modest reliability reported here.

5. Conclusions

The present study set out to investigate whether global warming and elevated concentration of CO2 and other greenhouse gases over the past 70 years have left the trace on the microstructure of ice deposited in Antarctica during this time. A systematic analysis of relevant data published in literature revealed a strong correlation between atmospheric CO2 levels and changes in the microstructural characteristics of Antarctic surface ice from 1961 to 2020. The most pronounced trend was a steady increase in the grain size over time, rising from an average of 0.57 mm in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s combined to 1.29 mm in the period from 1990 to date. In contrast, the grain aspect ratio and solidity exhibited a gradual decline, with the aspect ratio showing a change rate comparable to that of grain size, decreasing from 2.27 in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s combined to 2.00 in the 1990s to 1.72 in the 21st century. While such trends provide a robust observation grounded in literature data, the underlying mechanisms driving these changes remain speculative owing to a lack of direct experimental evidence linking atmospheric compositional changes to the structural characteristics of polar ice.
This study has significant limitations, stemming from the inherent variability of environmental, spatial, and seasonal factors that influence snow and ice crystal morphology in Antarctica. Factors such as sampling depth, elevation, distance from the ocean, seasonal precipitation cycles, and atmospheric ion composition introduce substantial variabilities, making it difficult to isolate the direct effects of atmospheric CO2. While stringent criteria for data selection were implemented to mitigate some of these confounding factors, the overall variability in sampling methods, geographical distribution and observational techniques employed across studies mitigate the precision of the correlations. Furthermore, the methods used to measure the grain dimensions varied substantially over time, potentially introducing biases related to technological advancements in analytical techniques of relevance.
The findings of this study should therefore be viewed as a proof-of-concept rather than definitive conclusions. The combination of modest sample sizes, variability between datasets and reliance on indirect connections between greenhouse gas concentrations and ice morphology makes it imperative to distinguish robust observations from speculative interpretations. Future research should employ advanced computational tools, such as machine learning algorithms or artificial neural networks, to analyze far larger and more comprehensive datasets. Additionally, controlled experiments simulating CO2 levels and their influence on snow crystal formation could help clarify the hypothesized mechanisms. Incorporating multi-year, geographically diverse datasets while employing methods to address spatial and seasonal variability will improve the reliability of observed correlations. Despite the inherent uncertainty in attributing microstructural changes directly to atmospheric greenhouse gas levels, the findings presented here offer a valuable framework for understanding long-term trends in ice morphology, which may contribute to systemic outcomes ranging from diminished ice stability to accelerated ice sheet disintegration to rising sea levels.
The findings reported here indicate a clear correlation between the rising levels of greenhouse gases and the evolution of ice microstructure. In the long term, these structural changes may provide a balancing mechanism for the planetary climate homeostasis, but may also contribute to the weakening of ice integrity. This would increase the susceptibility of ice to melting and fracturing, thus accelerating ice sheet disintegration and sea level rise. Given these potentially dire outcomes of physicochemical events starting at the atomic scale, the findings presented here stress out the need for further and more empirically and computationally elaborate investigation into the impact of atmospheric composition on ice stability. Antarctica currently houses the world’s most advanced facilities for detecting neutrinos and other cosmic rays, and if similarly sophisticated infrastructure for studying the climatic changes occurring in ice caps on the atomic scale were to be established, answers to the questions raised by this study could potentially be answered in foreseeable future.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Gratitude is extended to Christopher Persichilli of Fullerton College for sharing his Antarctic research experience and inspiring the author to discover the scientific significance of this abandoned continent.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nicklin, G. The colonial and extracolonial bordering of Antarctica. In Colonialism and Antarctica: Attitudes, Logics, and Practices; Roberts, P., Mancilla, A., Eds.; Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nicklin, G. The implied border mechanisms of Antarctica: Arguing the case for an Antarctic borderscape. Borderl. J. 2020, 19, 27–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dodds, K. What is Antarctica? Geography 2024, 109, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jackson, A. Antarctica without Borders. Issues 2012, 100, 12. [Google Scholar]
  5. Karacan, D.B.; Ozsoy, B.; Okay, D.Z. Scientific research and collaboration in Antarctica: Türkiye’s engagement from a science diplomacy perspective. Polar Sci. 2024, 39, 101035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farman, J.C.; Gardiner, B.G.; Shanklin, J.D. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 1985, 315, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morlighem, M.; Rignot, E.; Binder, T.; Blankenship, D.; Drews, R.; Eagles, G.; Eisen, O.; Ferraccioli, F.; Forsberg, R.; Fretwell, P.; et al. Deep glacial troughs and stabilizing ridges unveiled beneath the margins of the Antarctic ice sheet. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Turner, J.; Phillips, T.; Hosking, J.S.; Marshall, G.J.; Bracegirdle, T.J. Future projections of temperature and precipitation for Antarctica. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 014029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bauska, T.K. Ice core records of atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, D.; Prior, D.J.; Han, Y.; Qi, C.; Han, H.; Ju, H.T. Microstructures and Fabric Transitions of Natural Ice from the Styx Glacier, Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Minerals 2020, 10, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lüthi, D.; Le Floch, M.; Bereiter, B.; Blunier, T.; Barnola, J.-M.; Siegenthaler, U.; Raynaud, D.; Jouzel, J.; Fischer, H.; Kawamura, K.; et al. High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present. Nature 2008, 453, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Levy, R.; Harwood, D.; Florindo, F.; Sangiorgi, F.; Tripati, R.; von Eynatten, H.; Gasson, E.; Kuhn, G.; Tripati, A.; DeConto, R.; et al. Antarctic ice sheet sensitivity to atmospheric CO2 variations in the early to mid-Miocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3453–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uskoković, V. Ion-Doped Hydroxyapatite: An Impasse or the Road to Follow? Ceramics International 2020, 46, 11443–11465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Uskoković, V. An Odyssey at the Interface—A Study in the Stream of Consciousness. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2022, 12, 5150–5160. [Google Scholar]
  15. Uskoković, V. The Samsonov Configurational Model: Instructive Historical Remarks and Extension of Its Application to Substituted Hydroxyapatite. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2023, 43, 106–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Keeling, C.D.; Piper, S.C.; Bacastow, R.B.; Wahlen, M.; Whorf, T.P.; Heimann, M.; Meijer, H.A.I. Global aspects. In Exchanges of Atmospheric CO2 and 13CO2 with the Terrestrial Biosphere and Oceans from 1978 to 2000; SIO Reference Series, No. 01–06; Scripps Institution of Oceanography: San Diego, CA, USA, 2001; 88p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Uskoković, V. Entering the Era of Nanoscience: Time to Be So Small. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 9, 1441–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Qian, Z.; Huang, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, J. Effect of Grain Size on the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Ice Forming with Different Wind Speeds in a Cold Laboratory. Water 2024, 16, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Currier, J.H.; Schulson, E.M. The tensile strength of ice as a function of grain size. Acta Metall. 1982, 30, 1511–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiscombe, W.J.; Warren, S.G. A model for the spectral albedo of snow, 1. Pure snow. J. Atmos. Sci. 1980, 37, 2712–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grenfell, T.C.; Warren, S.G.; Mullen, P.C. Reflection of solar radiation by the Antarctic snow surface at ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared wavelengths. J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 18669–18684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maykut, G.A. The surface heat and mass balance. In The Geophysics of Sea Ice; Untersteiner, N., Ed.; NATO ASI Ser., Ser. B.; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 146, pp. 395–463. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khuller, A.R.; Warren, S.G.; Christensen, P.R.; Clow, G.D. Potential for photosynthesis on Mars within snow and ice. Commun Earth Env. 2024, 5, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fowler, J.R.; Iverson, N.R. A permeameter for temperate ice: First results on permeability sensitivity to grain size. J. Glaciol. 2022, 68, 764–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hettiarachchi, C.; Mampearachchi, W.K. Effect of surface texture, size ratio and large particle volume fraction on packing density of binary spherical mixtures. Granul. Matter 2020, 22, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grenfell, T.C.; Warren, S.G. Representation of a nonspherical ice particle by a collection of independent spheres for scattering and absorption of radiation. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104, 31697–31709. [Google Scholar]
  27. Beers, T.M.; Sneed, S.B.; Mayewski, P.A.; Kurbatov, A.V.; Handley, M.J. Triple Junction and Grain Boundary Influences on Climate Signals in Polar Ice. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.14268v1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wolff, E.W.; Mulvaney, R.; Oates, K. The location of impurities in Antarctic ice. Ann. Glaciol. 1988, 11, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nishimura, H.; Maeno, N. Studies on structures and physical properties of snow on Mizuho Plateau, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 1985, 6, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, S.; Zhang, N.; Wang, D.; Shi, G.; Ma, T.; Ma, H.; An, C.; Li, Y. Spatial Variations of Fabric and Microstructure of Blue Ice Cores at the Shear Margin of Dalk Glacier, Antarctica. Water 2023, 15, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. MacDonell, S.; Fernandoy, F.; Villar, P.; Hammann, A. Stratigraphic Analysis of Firn Cores from an Antarctic Ice Shelf Firn Aquifer. Water 2021, 13, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Skatulla, S.; Audh, R.R.; Cook, A.; Hepworth, E.; Johnson, S.; Lupascu, D.C.; MacHutchon, K.; Marquart, R.; Mielke, T.; Omatuku, E.; et al. Physical and mechanical properties of winter first-year ice in the Antarctic marginal ice zone along the Good Hope Line. Cryosphere 2022, 16, 2899–2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, P.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z. Flexural and compressive strength of the landfast sea ice in the Prydz Bay, East Antarctic. Cryosphere 2022, 16, 1941–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Johnson, S.; Audh, R.R.; de Jager, W.; Matlakala, B.; Vichi, M.; Womack, A.; Rampai, T. Physical and morphological properties of first-year Antarctic sea ice in the spring marginal ice zone of the Atlantic-Indian sector. J. Glaciol. 2023, 69, 1351–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Thomas, R.E.; Negrini, M.; Prior, D.J.; Mulvaney, R.; Still, H.; Bowman, M.H.; Craw, L.; Fan, S.; Hubbard, B.; Hulbe, C.; et al. Microstructure and Crystallographic Preferred Orientations of an Azimuthally Oriented Ice Core from a Lateral Shear Margin: Priestley Glacier, Antarctica. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 9, 702213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Inoue, R.; Fujita, S.; Kawamura, K.; Oyabu, I.; Nakazawa, F.; Motoyama, H.; Aoki, T. Spatial distribution of vertical density and microstructure profiles in near-surface firn around Dome Fuji, Antarctica. Cryosphere 2024, 18, 425–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moser, D.E.; Hörhold, M.; Kipfstuhl, S.; Freitag, J. Microstructure of Snow and Its Link to Trace Elements and Isotopic Composition at Kohnen Station, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Front. Earth Sci. 2020, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bolshunov, A.V.; Vasilev, D.A.; Dmitriev, A.N.; Ignatev, S.A.; Kadochnikov, V.G.; Krikun, N.S.; Serbin, D.V.; Shadrin, V.S. Results of complex experimental studies at Vostok station in Antarctica. J. Min. Inst. 2023, 263, 724–741. [Google Scholar]
  39. Carlsen, T.; Birnbaum, G.; Ehrlich, A.; Freitag, J.; Heygster, G.; Istomina, L.; Kipfstuhl, S.; Orsi, A.; Schäfer, M.; Wendisch, M. Comparison of different methods to retrieve optical-equivalent snow grain size in central Antarctica. Cryosphere 2017, 11, 2727–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Calonne, N.; Montagnat, M.; Matzl, M.; Schneebeli, M. The layered evolution of fabric and microstructure of snow at Point Barnola, Central East Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2017, 460, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Proksch, M.; Löwe, H.; Schneebeli, M. Density, specific surface area, and correlation length of snow measured by high-resolution penetrometry. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2015, 120, 346–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dadic, R.; Schneebeli, M.; Bertler, N.A.N.; Schwikowski, M.; Matzl, M. Extreme snow metamorphism in the Allan Hills, Antarctica, as an analogue for glacial conditions with implications for stable isotope composition. J. Glaciol. 2015, 61, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pirazzini, R.; Räisänen, P.; Vihma, T.; Johansson, M.; Tastula, E.-M. Measurements and modelling of snow particle size and shortwave infrared albedo over a melting Antarctic ice sheet. Cryosphere 2015, 9, 2357–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lebedev, G.A.; Fedotov, V.I.; Cherepanov, N.V. Some features of sea ice formation in Antarctic coastal waters. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 2013, 38, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mahoney, A.R.; Gough, A.J.; Langhorne, P.J.; Robinson, N.J.; Stevens, C.L.; Williams, M.M.J.; Haskell, T.G. The seasonal appearance of ice shelf water in coastal Antarctica and its effect on sea ice growth. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2011, 116, C11032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gallet, J.-C.; Domine, F.; Savarino, J.; Dumont, M.; Brun, E. The growth of sublimation crystals and surface hoar on the Antarctic plateau. Cryosphere 2014, 8, 1205–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gallet, J.-C.; Domine, F.; Arnaud, L.; Picard, G.; Savarino, J. Vertical profiles of the specific surface area of the snow at Dome C, Antarctica. Cryosphere Discuss. 2010, 4, 1647–1708. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fujita, S.; Okuyama, J.; Hori Hondoh, T. Metamorphism of stratified firn at Dome Fuji, Antarctica: A mechanism for local insolation modulation of gas transport conditions during bubble close off. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114, F03023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dempsey, D.E.; Langhorne, P.J.; Robinson, N.J.; Haskell, T.G.; Frew, R. Observation and modeling of platelet ice fabric in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2010, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saruya, T.; Fujita, S.; Iizuka, Y.; Miyamoto, A.; Ohno, H.; Hori, A.; Shigeyama, W.; Hirabayashi, M.; Goto-Azuma, K. Development of crystal orientation fabric in the Dome Fuji ice core in East Antarctica: Implications for the deformation regime in ice sheets. Cryosphere 2022, 16, 2985–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Freitag, J.; Kipfstuhl, S.; Faria, S.H. The connectivity of crystallite agglomerates in low-density firn at Kohnen station, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 2008, 49, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brucker, L.; Picard, G.; Arnaud, L.; Barnola, J.-M.; Schneebeli, M.; Brunjail, H.; Lefebvre, E.; Fily, M. Modeling time series of microwave brightness temperature at Dome C, Antarctica, using vertically resolved snow temperature and microstructure measurements. J. Glaciol. 2011, 57, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Alencar, A.S.; Evangelista, H., Jr.; Simões, J.C.; Felzenszwalb, I.; Setzer, A.; Passos, H.R. On the potential of glaciochemical analysis of Joinville Island firn core for the sea ice reconstruction around the northern Antarctic Peninsula. An. Da Acad. Bras. De Cienc. 2024, 96 (Suppl. S2), e20230751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tang, S.; Qin, D.; Ren, J.; Kang, J.; Li, Z. Structure, salinity and isotopic composition of multi-year landfast sea ice in Nella Fjord, Antarctica. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2007, 49, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kärkäs, E.; Martma, T.; Sonninen, E. Physical properties and stratigraphy of surface snow in western Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Polar Res. 2005, 24, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rasmus, K.; Granberg, H.; Kanto, K.; Kärkäs, E.; Lavoie, C.; Leppäranta, M. Seasonal Snow in Antarctica Data Report; Report Series in Geophysics No. 47; University of Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gow, A.J.; Meese, D.A.; Bialas, R.W. Accumulation variability, density profiles and crystal growth trends in ITASE firn and ice cores from West Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 2004, 39, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Albert, M.R.; Shultz, E.F.; Perron, F.E., Jr. Snow and firm permeability at Siple Dome, Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 2000, 31, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gay, M.; Fily, M.; Frezzotti, M.; Genthon, C.; Oerter, H.; Winther, J.G. Snow grain-size measurements in Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 2002, 48, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Haas, C.; Thomas, D.N.; Bareiss, J. Surface properties and processes of perennial Antarctic sea ice in summer. J. Glaciol. 2001, 47, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Massom, R.A.; Lytle, V.I.; Worby, A.P.; Allison, I. Winter snow cover variability on East Antarctic sea ice. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 24837–24855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cagnati, A. Some observations on snowpack features in Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 1997, 20, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  63. Haas, C. The seasonal cycle of ERS scatterometer signatures over perennial Antarctic sea ice and associated surface ice properties and processes. Ann. Glaciol. 2001, 33, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sturm, M.; Morris, K.; Massom, R. The winter snow cover of the West Antarctic pack ice: Its spatial and temporal variability. In Antarctic Sea Ice: Physical Processes, Interactions and Variability; Jeffries, M.O., Ed.; Antarctic Research Set: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Volume 74, pp. 19–40. [Google Scholar]
  65. Watanabe, O.; Shimada, W.; Narita, H.; Miyamoto, A.; Tayuki, K.; Hondoh, T.; Kawamura, T.; Fujita, S.; Shoji, H.; Enomoto, H.; et al. Preliminary discussion of physical properties of the Dome Fuji shallow ice core in 1993, Antarctica. In Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Meteorology and Glaciology, Tokyo, Japan, 13–14 October 1997; Volume 11, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  66. Worby, A.P.; Massom, R.A. The Structure and Properties of Sea Ice and Snow Covering East Antarctic Pack Ice; Research Report No. 7; Antarctic CRC: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 1995; 191p. [Google Scholar]
  67. Massom, R.A.; Drinkwater, M.R.; Haas, C. Winter snow cover on sea ice in the Weddell Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 1997, 102, 1101–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jeffries, M.O.; Shaw, R.A.; Veazey, K.M.A.L.; Krouse, H.R. Crystal structure, stable isotopes and development of sea ice in the Ross, Amundsen, and Bellingshausen seas, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 985–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Walden, V.P.; Warren, S.G.; Tuttle, E. Atmospheric Ice Crystals over the Antarctic Plateau in Winter. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 2003, 42, 1391–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Veazey, A.L.; Jeffries, M.O.; Morris, K. Small-scale variability of physical properties and structural characteristics of Antarctic fast ice. Ann. Glaciol. 1994, 20, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Iwai, K. Three dimensional fine structures of bullet-type snow crystals and their growth conditions observed at Syowa Station, Antarctica. J. Jpn. Soc. Snow Ice 1999, 61, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jeffries, M.O.; Weeks, W.F. Structural characteristics and development of sea ice in the western Ross Sea. Antarct. Sci. 1992, 5, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Konishi, H.; Muramoto, K.; Shiina, T.; Endoh, T.; Kitano, K. Z-R relation for graupels and aggregates observed at Syowa Station, Antarctica. Proc. NIPR Symp. Polar Meteorol. Glaciol. 1992, 5, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hatanaka, M.; Ohta, Y.; Nishitsuji, A.; Sakaguchi, T.; Wada, M. A method of measuring snow particle size from video images for meteorological radar observations. Proc. NIPR Symp. Polar Meteorol. Glaciol. 1995, 9, 110–117. [Google Scholar]
  75. Tison, J.L.; Haren, J. Isotopic, chemical and crystallographic characteristics of first-year sea ice from Breid Bay (Princess Ragnhild Coast-Antarctica). Antarct. Sci. 1989, 1, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Alley, R.B.; Bentley, C.R. Ice-core analysis on the Siple Coast of West Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 1988, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dahe, Q.; Young, N.W.; Thwaites, R.J. Growth rate of crystals within the surface-snow/firn layer in Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 1988, 11, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Urabe, N.; Inoue, M. Mechanical properties of Antarctic Sea ice. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 1988, 110, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lange, M.A. Basic properties of Antarctic sea ice as revealed by textural analysis of ice cores. Ann. Glaciol. 1988, 10, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wada, M.; Gonda, T. Snow crystals of hollow-prism type observed at Mizuho Station, Antarctica. Antarct. Rec. 1985, 86, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  81. Duval, P.; Lorius, C. Crystal size and climatic records down to the last Ice Age from Antarctic ice. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1980, 48, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ohtake, T. Atmospheric ice crystals at the South Pole in summer. Antarct. J. 1978, 13, 174–175. [Google Scholar]
  83. Iwai, K. Morphological features of combination of bullet-type snow crystals observed at Syowa Station, Antarctica. Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res. 1986, 45, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kikuchi, K.; Hogan, A.W. Properties of diamond dust type ice crystals observed in summer season at Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, Antarctica. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 1978, 57, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hogan, A.W. Summer ice crystal precipitation at the South Pole. J. Appl. Meteorol. 1974, 14, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Paige, R.A. Crystallographic Studies of Sea Ice in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica; Technical Report R-494; US Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory: Port Hueneme, CA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  87. Shimizu, H. “Long prism” crystals observed in the precipitation in Antarctica. J. Meteor. Soc. Jpn. Ser II. 1963, 41, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jones, M.W.; Peters, G.P.; Gasser, T.; Andrew, R.M.; Schwingshackl, C.; Gütschow, J.; Houghton, R.A.; Friedlingstein, P.; Pongratz, J.; Le Quéré, C. National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Inman, M. Carbon is forever. Nat. Clim. Change 2008, 1, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qin, Z.; Buehler, M.J. Carbon dioxide enhances fragility of ice crystals. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2012, 45, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fan, S.; Prior, D.J.; Pooley, B.; Bowman, H.; Davidson, L.; Wallis, D.; Piazolo, S.; Qi, C.; Goldsby, D.L.; Hager, T.F. Grain growth of natural and synthetic ice at 0 °C. Cryosphere 2023, 17, 3443–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mushbrain. Freezing Carbonated Sparkling Water vs. Distilled Water. Science Buddies. 31 January 2005. Available online: www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/ask-an-expert/viewtopic.php?t=392 (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  93. Zhu, Z.W.; Sun, D.W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.F.; Cheng, L.N. Effects of micro-nano bubbles on the nucleation and crystal growth of sucrose and maltodextrin solutions during ultrasound-assisted freezing process. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 92, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yu, D.; Liu, B. Effect of ultrasound on the nucleation temperature of water with varied air contents. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019, 207, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Xu, B.G.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Sun, J.; Gao, Z. Infusion of CO2 in a solid food: A novel method to enhance the low-frequency ultrasound effect on immersion freezing process. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cui, W.; Jia, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Mo, S. Supercooling of water controlled by nanoparticles and ultrasound. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Adhikari, B.M.; Truong, T.; Prakash, S.; Bansal, N.; Bhandari, B. Impact of incorporation of CO2 on the melting, texture and sensory attributes of soft-serve ice cream. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 109, 104789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Uskoković, V. Revisiting the Fundamentals in the Design and Control of Nanoparticulate Colloids in the Frame of Soft Chemistry. Rev. J. Chem. 2013, 3, 271–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Palmer Station Antarctica LTER; Ducklow, H.; Karl, D. Dissolved Inorganic Carbon and Alkalinity of Discrete Water Column Samples, Collected Aboard PALMER LTER Annual Cruises of the Western Antarctic Peninsula, 1993–2019; ver 8; Environmental Data Initiative: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Libbrecht, K. The Formation of Snow Crystals. Am. Sci. 2007, 95, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Phillips, V.A.; Kolbe, J.L.; Opperhauser, H. Effect of pH on the growth of Mg(OH)2 crystals in an aqueous environment at 60 °C. J. Cryst. Growth 1977, 41, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Uskoković, V.; Wu, L.; Habelitz, S. Biomimetic Precipitation of Uniaxially Grown Calcium Phosphate Crystals from Full-Length Human Amelogenin Sols. J. Bionic Eng. 2011, 8, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Uskoković, V.; Batarni, S.S.; Schweicher, J.; King, A.; Desai, T.A. Effect of Calcium Phosphate Particle Shape and Size on their Antibacterial and Osteogenic Activity in the Delivery of Antibiotics in vitro. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 2422–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Sugimoto, T.; Matijević, E. Formation of uniform spherical magnetite particles by crystallization from ferrous hydroxide gels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 74, 227–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, T.-J.; Fang, W.-S.; Liu, Y.-M.; Li, F.-M.; Chen, P.; Chen, Y. Heterostructured Pd/PdO nanowires for selective and efficient CO2 electroreduction to CO. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 70, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lindsey, R. Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Climate.gov (9 April 2024). Available online: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  107. Libbrecht, K.G. Morphogenesis on Ice: The Physics of Snow Crystals. Eng. Sci. 2001, 1, 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  108. Nakaya, U. Formation of snow-crystals in the mountains and in the laboratory in Japan (A sound film). Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1940, 21, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  109. Libbrecht, K.G. Toward a Comprehensive Model of Snow Crystal Growth Dynamics: 1. Overarching Features and Physical Origins. arXiv 2012, arXiv:1211.5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yin, J.; Zhang, J.; Lv, L.; Zhong, H. Effect of CO2 on the heterogeneous condensation of water vapor on insoluble fine particles. Powder Technol. 2022, 408, 117728. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kurniawan, E.A.D.; Fatmawati; Miswanto. Modeling of global warming effect on the melting of polar ice caps with optimal control analysis. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2329, 040006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Uskoković, E.; Uskoković, T.; Wu, V.M.; Uskoković, V. …And All the World a Dream: Memory Effects Outlining the Path to Explaining the Strange Temperature-Dependency of Crystallization of Water, a.k.a. the Mpemba Effect. Subst. Int. J. Hist. Chem. 2020, 4, 59–117. [Google Scholar]
  113. Gow, A.J.; Williamson, T. Rheological implications of the internal structure and crystal fabrics of the West Antarctic ice sheet as revealed by deep core drilling at Byrd Station. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1976, 87, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Koerner, R.M.; Fisher, D.A. Discontinuous Flow, Ice Texture, and Dirt Content in the Basal Layers of the Devon Island Ice Cap. J. Glaciol. 1979, 23, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cuffey, K.M.; Paterson, W.S.B. The Physics of Glaciers, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  116. Thorsteinsson, T.; Kipfstuhl, J.; Eicken, H.; Johnsen, S.J.; Fuhrer, K. Crystal size variations in Eemian-age ice from the GRIP ice core, central Greenland. Earth Planet. Sc. Lett. 1995, 131, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Alley, R.B.; Woods, G.A. Impurity influence on normal grain growth in the GISP2 ice core, Greenland. J. Glaciol. 1996, 42, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Durand, G.; Weiss, J.; Lipenkov, V.; Barnola, J.; Krinner, G.; Parrenin, F.; Delmonte, B.; Ritz, C.; Duval, P.; Röthlisberger, R. Effect of impurities on grain growth in cold ice sheets. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, F01015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wolff, E.W.; Legrand, M.R.; Wagenbach, D. Coastal Antarctic aerosol and snowfall chemistry. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 10927–10934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bertler, N.A.N.; Mayewski, P.A.; Barrett, P.J.; Sneed, S.B.; Handley, M.J.; Kreutz, K.J. Monsoonal circulation of the McMurdo Dry Valleys, Ross Sea region: Signal from the snow chemistry. Ann. Glaciol. 2004, 39, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Solomon, S.; Keys, J.G. Seasonal variations in Antarctic NO x chemistry. J. Geophys. Res. 1992, 97, 7971–7978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bertler, N.; Mayewski, P.; Aristarain, A.; Barrett, P.; Becagli, S.; Bernardo, R.; Bo, S.; Xiao, C.; Curran, M.; Qin, D.; et al. Snow chemistry across Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 2005, 41, 167–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Faria, S.H.; Kipfstuhl, S.; Azuma, N.; Freitag, J.; Weikusat, I.; Murshed, M.M.; Kuhs, W.F. The Multiscale Structure of Antarctica Part I: Inland Ice. In The Physics of Ice Core Records; Hondoh, T., Ed.; Yoshioka Publishing, Co., Ltd.: Kyoto, Japan, 2009; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  124. Oshima, K.; Yamazaki, K. Seasonal variation of moisture transport in polar regions and the relation with annular modes. Polar Meteorol. Glaciol 2004, 18, 30–53. [Google Scholar]
  125. Reid, P.A.; Budd, W.F. Calculation of Antarctic surface ice mass accumulation through atmospheric parameters. In Proceedings of the APOC and AMOS Joint Conference, Lorne, Victoria, Australia, 20–22 February 1995. [Google Scholar]
  126. Budd, W.F.; Reid, P.A.; Minty, L.J. Antarctic moisture flux and net accumulation from global atmospheric analyses. Ann. Glaciol. 1995, 21, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Furukawa, Y. Snow and Ice Crystal Growth. In Handbook of Crystal Growth, 2nd ed.; Nishinaga, T., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1061–1112. [Google Scholar]
  128. Riche, F.; Montagnat, M.; Scheebeli, M. Evolution of crystal orientation in snow during temperature gradient metamorphism. J. Glaciol. 2013, 59, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Duval, P.; Ashby, M.F.; Anderman, I. Rate-controlling processes in the creep of polycrystalline ice. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4066–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chen, B.; Zhang, R.; Sun, S.; Bian, L.; Xiao, C.; Zhang, T. A one-dimensional heat transfer model of the Antarctic Ice Sheet and modeling of snow temperatures at Dome A, the summit of Antarctic Plateau. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2010, 53, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cuffey, K.M.; Steig, E.J. Isotopic diffusion in polar firn: Implications for interpretation of seasonal climate parameters in ice-core records, with emphasis on central Greenland. J. Glaciol. 1998, 44, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Frezzotti, M.; Gandolfi, S.; Urbini, S. Snow megadunes in Antarctica: Sedimentary structure and genesis. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107, 4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Massom, R.A.; Eicken, H.; Haas, C.; Jeffries, M.O.; Drinkwater, M.R.; Sturm, M.; Worby, A.P.; Wu, X.; Lytle, V.I.; Ushio, S.; et al. Snow on Antarctic sea ice. Rev. Geophys. 2001, 39, 413–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhao, J.; Cheng, B.; Vihma, T.; Yang, Q.; Hui, F.; Zhao, B.; Hao, G.; Shen, H.; Zhang, L. Observation and thermodynamic modeling of the influence of snow cover on landfast sea ice thickness in Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 2019, 168, 102869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Schwarzacher, W. Pack-ice studies in the Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 1959, 64, 2357–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Anonymous. Average Humidity in Vostok Station. Weather & Climate. 2025. Available online: https://weather-and-climate.com/average-monthly-Humidity-perc,Vostok+Station-AQ,antarctica (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  137. Anonymous. Climate and Monthly Weather Forecast McMurdo, Antarctica. Weather Atlas. 2025. Available online: https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/antarctica/mcmurdo-climate (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  138. Treverrow, A.; Warner, R.C.; Budd, W.F.; Craven, M. Meteoric and marine ice crystal orientation fabrics from the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 2010, 56, 877–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Crook, J. Ice Growth and Platelet Crystals in Antarctica. Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  140. Leppäranta, M. A review of analytical models of sea-ice growth. Atmos.-Ocean 1993, 31, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Norikazu, M.; Ebinuma, T. Pressure sintering of ice and its implication to the densification of snow at polar glaciers and ice sheets. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4103–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Knepp, T.N.; Renkens, T.L.; Shepson, P.B. Gas phase acetic acid and its qualitative effects on snow crystal morphology and the quasi-liquid layer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 7679–7690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Obbard, R.; Baker, I. The microstructure of meteoric ice from Vostok, Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 2007, 53, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shiraiwa, T.; Shoji, H.; Saito, T.; Yokoyama, K.; Watanabe, O. Structure and dielectric properties of surface snow along the traverse route from coast to Dome Fuji station, Queen Maud Land, Victoria. Proc. NIPR Symp. Polar Meteorol. Glaciol. 1996, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  145. Erbe, E.F.; Rango, A.; Foster, J.; Josberger, E.G.; Pooley, C.; Wergin, W.P. Collecting, shipping, storing, and imaging snow crystals and ice grains with low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2003, 62, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mulvaney, R.; Wolff, E.; Oates, K. Sulphuric acid at grain boundaries in Antarctic ice. Nature 1988, 331, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Li, C.; van Donkelaar, A.; Hammer, M.S.; McDuffie, E.E.; Burnett, R.T.; Spadaro, J.V.; Chatterjee, D.; Cohen, A.J.; Apte, J.S.; Southerland, V.A.; et al. Reversal of trends in global fine particulate matter air pollution. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Stoll, N.; Bohleber, P.; Dallmayr, R.; Wilhelms, F.; Barbante, C.; Weikusat, I. The new frontier of microstructural impurity research in polar ice. Ann. Glaciol. 2023, 64, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Stoll, N.; Eichler, J.; Hörhold, M.; Shigeyama, W.; Weikusat, I. A Review of the Microstructural Location of Impurities in Polar Ice and Their Impacts on Deformation. Front. Earth Sci. 2021, 8, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Merged in situ and flask data for averaged monthly atmospheric CO2 concentrations measured since 1957 by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography station at the South Pole (90°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W). Data retrieved from https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric_co2/spo.html (accessed on 12 February 2025). Monthly averages of flask atmospheric concentrations of (b) CO and (c) CH4 in the Antarctic air, as measured by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition at the Syowa station (69°0′15′′ S 39°34′55′′ E). Data retrieved from https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=syo-co-flask-month and https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=syo-ch4-flask-month (accessed on 18 February 2025). (d) Monthly averages of N2O flask measurements at the South Pole (90°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W), as reported by the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. Data retrieved from https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=spo-n2o-flask-month (accessed on 18 February 2025).
Figure 1. (a) Merged in situ and flask data for averaged monthly atmospheric CO2 concentrations measured since 1957 by the Scripps Institute of Oceanography station at the South Pole (90°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W). Data retrieved from https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/data/atmospheric_co2/spo.html (accessed on 12 February 2025). Monthly averages of flask atmospheric concentrations of (b) CO and (c) CH4 in the Antarctic air, as measured by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition at the Syowa station (69°0′15′′ S 39°34′55′′ E). Data retrieved from https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=syo-co-flask-month and https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=syo-ch4-flask-month (accessed on 18 February 2025). (d) Monthly averages of N2O flask measurements at the South Pole (90°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W), as reported by the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. Data retrieved from https://gml.noaa.gov/data/dataset.php?item=spo-n2o-flask-month (accessed on 18 February 2025).
Quaternary 08 00057 g001
Figure 2. Average grain size (a,b), grain aspect ratio (c,d), grain irregularity expressed as the inverse of circularity (e,f), and grain solidity (g,h) of surface or near-surface Antarctic snow or firn as a function of the year (a,c,e,g) or decade (b,d,f,h) of their sampling. Each data point in (a,c,e,g) corresponds to an average extracted from an individual literature source referred to in Table 1. Linear fits reflect the overall trends followed by the respective microstructure parameters over time. Data normalized to decades on which the surface or near-surface Antarctic snow or firn were sampled are represented as averages of no less than 2 (1960s) and no more than 15 (1990s), 14 (2010s), 12 (2010s) and 12 (2010s) measurements in (b), (d), (f) and (h), respectively. Error bars in (b), (d), (f) and (h) represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 2. Average grain size (a,b), grain aspect ratio (c,d), grain irregularity expressed as the inverse of circularity (e,f), and grain solidity (g,h) of surface or near-surface Antarctic snow or firn as a function of the year (a,c,e,g) or decade (b,d,f,h) of their sampling. Each data point in (a,c,e,g) corresponds to an average extracted from an individual literature source referred to in Table 1. Linear fits reflect the overall trends followed by the respective microstructure parameters over time. Data normalized to decades on which the surface or near-surface Antarctic snow or firn were sampled are represented as averages of no less than 2 (1960s) and no more than 15 (1990s), 14 (2010s), 12 (2010s) and 12 (2010s) measurements in (b), (d), (f) and (h), respectively. Error bars in (b), (d), (f) and (h) represent standard errors of the mean.
Quaternary 08 00057 g002
Table 1. Literature sources of the micrographs and/or other microstructural parameters of Antarctic surface ice analyzed and the accompanying information pertaining to the original sampling sites, dates and depths. Superscripted asterisk denotes extrapolated depth.
Table 1. Literature sources of the micrographs and/or other microstructural parameters of Antarctic surface ice analyzed and the accompanying information pertaining to the original sampling sites, dates and depths. Superscripted asterisk denotes extrapolated depth.
Year of SamplingAuthors [Ref.]LocationCoordinatesAltitude (masl)Depth (m)
2020Lu et al. [30]Dålk Glacier, East Antarctica69°24′0′′ S 76°20′0′′ E139–1610.035
2019MacDonell et al. [31]Müller Ice Shelf67°14′0′′ S 66°52′0′′ W190.6
2019Skatulla et al. [32]Good Hope Line Transect58°8′16′′ S 0°0′16′′ W00.05
2019Wang et al. [33]Prydz Bay69°12′0′′ S 76°18′0′′ E00.15
2019Johnson et al. [34]Southern Ocean50°0′0′′ S 0°0′0′′ W–90°0′0′′ S 360°0′0′′ W00.55
2018Thomas et al. [35]Priestley Glacier, Terra Nova Bay74°20′0′′ S 163°22′0′′ E80–22002.4
2017Inoue et al. [36]Dome Fuji, Queen Maud Land77°47′17′′ S 39°3′14′′ E37640.1
2015Moser et al. [37]Kohnen Station, Dronning Maud Land75°0′0′′ S 0°4′0′′ E28920.1
2015Bolshunov et al. [38]Vostok Station Area78°27′50′′ S 106°50′ E34880.5
2014Carlsen et al. [39]Kohnen Station75°0′0′′ S 0°4′0′′ E28920
2012Calonne et al. [40]Point Barnola, Central East Antarctica75°42′0′′ S 123°15′0′′ E32360.2
2012Proksch et al. [41]Kohnen Station75°0′0′′ S 0°7′0′′ E28920.015
2011Dadic et al. [42]Allan Hills76°40′12′′ S 159°13′48′′ E1600–21000.2
2010Pirazzini et al. [43]Aboa Station, Dronning Maud Land73°3′0′′ S 13°25′0′′ W2000.2
2010Lebedev et al. [44]Alasheev Gulf67°30′0′′ S 46°0′0′′ E00.25
2009Mahoney et al. [45]McMurdo Sound77°39′30′′ S 165°0′0′′ E100.05
2009Gallet et al. [46]Dome C75°6′0′′ S 123°21′0′′ E32330.01
2008Gallet et al. [47]Dome C75°6′0′′ S 123°21′0′′ E32330.02
2007Fujita et al. [48]Dome Fuji77°19′0′′ S 39°40′0′′ E38000–12.4
2007Dempsey et al. [49]McMurdo Sound77°39′30′′ S 165°0′0′′ E100.55
2007Saruya et al. [50]Dome Fuji77°19′0′′ S 39°42′0′′ E38000.5
2006Freitag et al. [51]Kohnen Station75°0′0′′ S 0°8′0′′ E28921
2006Brucker et al. [52]Dome C75°6′0′′ S 123°21′0′′ E32400.1
2005Alencar et al. [53]Joinville Island63°15′18” S 55°38′21” W565 & 4540.02
2003Tang et al. [54]Nella Fjord69°22′0′′ S 76°20′0′′ E 0.1
2002Kärkäs et al. [55]Riiser-Larsen ice shelf, Dronning Maud Land72°32′0′′ S 16°34′0′′ W–74°59′54′′ S 10°0′30′′ W30–25501.5
2000Rasmus et al. [56]Amundsenisen, Högisen and Kvitkuven72°32′0′′ S 16°34′0′′ W–74°59′54′′ S 10°0′30′′ W40–25501.5
2000Gow et al. [57]Byrd Station Area80°0′0′′ S 120°0′0′′ W935–18431–5
1999Albert et al. [58]Siple Dome81°39′0′′ S 148°48′36′′ W7300.1
1997Gay et al. [59]Terra Nova Bay, Dumont d’Urville and Talos Dome68°36′0′′ S 137°43′12′′ E–75°9′36′′ S 123°13′48′′ E600–34700.08
1995Haas et al. [60]Bellingshausen, Amundsen & Weddell Seas68°0′0′′ S 20°0′0′′ W–78°0′0′′ S 125°0′0′′ W00.05
1995Massom et al. [61]Indian & Western Pacific Oceans60°0′0′′ S 138°0′0′′ E–90°0′0′′ 142°0′0′′ E00
1994Cagnati [62]Terra Nova Bay Region74°42′ S 164°8′ E0–29600.05
1994Haas et al. [63]Weddell Sea70°0′0′′ S 60°0′0′′ W–78°0′0′′ S 20°0′0′′ W00
1994Sturm et al. [64]Bellingshausen, Amundsen & Ross Seas68°0′0′′ S 109°0′0′′ W–78°0′0′′ S 171°0′0′′ W00
1993Watanabe et al. [65]Dome Fiji77°19′0′′ S 39°40′0′′ E38100.8
1993Worby & Massom [66]Indian & Western Pacific Oceans60°0′0′′ S 139°0′0′′90°0′0′′ S 141°0′0′′ E &
60°0′0′′ S 144°0′0′′90°0′0′′ S 150°0′0′′ E &
00
1992Massom et al. [67]Weddell Sea70°0′0′′ S 60°0′0′′ W–78°0′0′′ S 20°0′0′′ W00
1992Jeffries et al. [68]Ross Sea, Amundsen Sea and Bellingshausen Sea68°0′0′′ S 57°0′0′′ W–78°0′0′′ S 160°0′0′′ W00.19
1992Walden et al. [69]Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station90°0′0′′ S 45°0′0′′ E28040
1992Veazey et al. [70]McMurdo Sound and Pine Island Bay77°52′35′′ S 166°45′47′′ E
&
74°38′45′′ S 102°17′46′′ W
≤100.18 and 0.27
1992Iwai [71]Syowa Station69°00′15″ S 39°34′55″ E180
1991Jeffries & Weeks [72]Ross Sea (Balleny Islands to Terra Nova Bay)71°17′0′′ S 170°14′0′′ E00.027
1989Konishi et al. [73]Syowa Station69°00′15″ S 39°34′55′′ E180
1988Hatanaka et al. [74]Syowa Station69°00′15′′ S 39°34′55′′ E
1986Tison et al. [75]Breid Bay70°13′0′′ S 23′47′0′′ E00.28
1985Alley & Bentley [76]Siple Coast83°28′4′′ S 138°5′49” W3350.1
1984Nishimura & Maeno [29]Mizuho Plateau, East Antarctica71°30′0′′ S 39°0′0′′ E22300.5
1984Dahe et al. [77]Law Dome & Casey Station, Wilkes Land 66°16′5′′ S 110°31′3′′ E3590.1
1984Urabe & Inoue [78]Ongul Strait, Lutzow-Holm Bay69°1′0′′ S 39°35′0′′ E00.15
1983Lange [79]Weddell Sea70°0′0′′ S 172°0′0′′ E–78°0′0′′ S 60°0′0′′ W 00.4
1979Wada & Gonda [80]Mizuho Station, East Antarctica70°41′57″ S 44°16′45″ E22300
1978Duval & Lorius [81]Dome C74°39′0′′ S 124°10′0′′ E32400*
1978Ohtake [82]Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station90°0′0′′ S 45°0′0′′ E28040
1977Iwai [83]Syowa Station69°00′15″ S 39°34′55′′ E180
1975Kikuchi & Hogan [84]Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station90°0′0′′ S 45°0′0′′ E28040
1974Hogan [85]Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station90°0′0′′ S 45°0′0′′ E28040.003
1966Paige [86]Hut Point Peninsula, McMurdo Sound77°47′0′′ S 166°51′0′′ E1430.50
1961Shimizu [87]Byrd Station80°0′0′′ S 120°0′0′′ W15530
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uskoković, V. Microstructural Evolution of Antarctic Ice with the Rising Atmospheric CO2: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis. Quaternary 2025, 8, 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8040057

AMA Style

Uskoković V. Microstructural Evolution of Antarctic Ice with the Rising Atmospheric CO2: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis. Quaternary. 2025; 8(4):57. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8040057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uskoković, Vuk. 2025. "Microstructural Evolution of Antarctic Ice with the Rising Atmospheric CO2: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis" Quaternary 8, no. 4: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8040057

APA Style

Uskoković, V. (2025). Microstructural Evolution of Antarctic Ice with the Rising Atmospheric CO2: A Longitudinal Meta-Analysis. Quaternary, 8(4), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/quat8040057

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop