Next Article in Journal
Study of the Stress–Strain State of the Structure of the GP-50 Support Bushing Manufactured by 3D Printing from PLA Plastic
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Mechanical Development of Alkali Coral Cementitious Materials Excited by Weak Alkali and the Formation, Development and Evolution of Gel Structure
Previous Article in Journal
Reuse of Activated Carbon Filter Waste as Filler in Vulcanized Rubber Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correction: Abdulmajid et al. Feasibility of the Maturity Concept for Strength Prediction in Geopolymer Based Materials. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 329
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bond Behavior Between Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Composites and Different Substrates: An Experimental Investigation

College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(8), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080407
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 26 July 2025 / Accepted: 30 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the bond behavior of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites with three common masonry substrates—solid clay bricks (SBs), perforated bricks (PBs), and concrete hollow blocks (HBs)—using knitted polyester grille (KPG) fabric. Through uniaxial tensile tests of the KPG fabric and FRCM system, along with single-lap and double-lap shear tests, the interfacial debonding modes, load-slip responses, and composite utilization ratio were evaluated. Key findings reveal that (i) SB and HB substrates predominantly exhibited fabric slippage (FS) or matrix–fabric (MF) debonding, while PB substrates consistently failed at the matrix–substrate (MS) interface, due to their smooth surface texture. (ii) Prism specimens with mortar joints showed enhanced interfacial friction, leading to higher load fluctuations compared to brick units. PB substrates demonstrated the lowest peak stress (69.64–74.33 MPa), while SB and HB achieved comparable peak stresses (133.91–155.95 MPa). (iii) The FRCM system only achieved a utilization rate of 12–30% in fabric and reinforcement systems. The debonding failure at the matrix–substrate interface is one of the reasons that cannot be ignored, and exploring methods to improve the bonding performance between the matrix–substrate interface is the next research direction. HB bricks have excellent bonding properties, and it is recommended to prioritize their use in retrofit applications, followed by SB bricks. These findings provide insights into optimizing the application of FRCM reinforcement systems in masonry structures.
Keywords: fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM); masonry retrofitting; interfacial bond behavior; debonding failure modes; knitted polyester grille (KPG) fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM); masonry retrofitting; interfacial bond behavior; debonding failure modes; knitted polyester grille (KPG)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, P.; Yuan, S.; Jia, S. Bond Behavior Between Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Composites and Different Substrates: An Experimental Investigation. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080407

AMA Style

Ma P, Yuan S, Jia S. Bond Behavior Between Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Composites and Different Substrates: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Composites Science. 2025; 9(8):407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080407

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Pengfei, Shangke Yuan, and Shuming Jia. 2025. "Bond Behavior Between Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Composites and Different Substrates: An Experimental Investigation" Journal of Composites Science 9, no. 8: 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080407

APA Style

Ma, P., Yuan, S., & Jia, S. (2025). Bond Behavior Between Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Composites and Different Substrates: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Composites Science, 9(8), 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9080407

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop