Next Article in Journal
Effects of Carbon Nanotubes on Thermal Behavior of Epoxy Resin Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Review on Characterization of Biochar Derived from Biomass Pyrolysis via Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Previous Article in Journal
Deep Learning Techniques for Predicting Stress Fields in Composite Materials: A Superior Alternative to Finite Element Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Efficient Method for Simulating the Temperature Distribution in Regions Containing YAG:Ce3+ Luminescence Composites of White LED
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Mechanical Properties of Uncured Thermoset Tow Prepreg: Experiment and Finite Element Analysis

J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(8), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7080312
by Mina Derakhshani Dastjerdi *, Massimo Carboni and Mehdi Hojjati
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(8), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7080312
Submission received: 23 June 2023 / Revised: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characterization and Modelling of Composites, Volume III)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Please proof read the paper once again and correct the Errors from Latex compilation, e.g page no. 3 line 122.

I would be happy to read the corrected version of the paper. 

Author Response

Thanks for your comment. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Very good work that deserves to be published. However it needs minor corrections before publication, as follows:

 

1.      In line 120 to correct (Error! Reference source not found ) ?

2.      According to which standard you have prepared your tensile samples?

3.      Why the choice of gauge length between 100 to 350 mm?

4.      In line 183 and 189 to correct (Error! Reference source not found ) ?

5.      Figure 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9, add unit on x axis

6.      For the representation of the RVE on Abaqus, did you use Python or work directly on the Abaqus software?

it is acceptable but it can improve it is if possible

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The paper has been significantly improved. However there is one issue that should be changed:

1. The stiffness tensor C_ij given in line 278 page 9 is a fourth order tensor and therefore it should be written as C_ijkl. The form C_ij represents a second order tensor.

Please consider to change the nottation.

Besides the above the Reviewer suggest to publish the paper. 

Reviewer 3 Report

I appreciate your clarifications on these matters. I have carefully reviewed the revised version of the paper and have observed the changes you pointed out. In my opinion, the authors have addressed the issues in a coherent, logical, and persuasive manner. Moreover, I couldn't find any errors in these aspects. Thank you for providing the necessary context and for the thorough revisions.

Back to TopTop