Next Article in Journal
Metal–Organic Framework (MOF) through the Lens of Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Current Status and Future Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Modelling and Experimental Investigation of Hexagonal Nacre-Like Structure Stiffness
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Manufacturing Composite Carbon Nanofiber-Based Aerogels
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Machine Learning Model to Detect Flow Disturbances during Manufacturing of Composites by Liquid Moulding
Article

Developing an Equivalent Solid Material Model for BCC Lattice Cell Structures Involving Vertical and Horizontal Struts

Department of Mechanical and Material Engineering, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4(2), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020074
Received: 4 May 2020 / Revised: 14 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Characterization and Modelling of Composites)
In this study, a body-centered cubic (BCC) lattice unit cell occupied inside a frame structure to create a so-called “InsideBCC” is considered. The equivalent quasi-isotropic properties required to describe the material behavior of the InsideBCC unit cell are equivalent Young’s modulus ( E e ) , equivalent shear modulus ( G e ) , and equivalent Poisson’s ratio ( ν e ) . The finite element analysis (FEA) based computational approach is used to simulate and calculate the mechanical responses of InsideBCC unit cell, which are the mechanical responses of the equivalent solid. Two separates finite element models are then developed for samples under compression: one with a 6 × 6 × 4 cell InsideBCC lattice cell structure (LCS) and one completely solid with equivalent solid properties obtained from a unit cell model. In addition, 6 × 6 × 4 cell specimens are fabricated on a fused deposition modeling (FDM) uPrint SEplus 3D printer using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material and tested experimentally under quasi-static compression load. Then, the results extracted from the finite element simulation of both the entire lattice and the equivalent solid models are compared with the experimental data. A good agreement between the experimental stress–strain behavior and that obtained from the FEA models is observed within the linear elastic limit. View Full-Text
Keywords: lattice cell structures; InsideBCC; equivalent solid properties; three-dimensional printing lattice cell structures; InsideBCC; equivalent solid properties; three-dimensional printing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Alwattar, T.A.; Mian, A. Developing an Equivalent Solid Material Model for BCC Lattice Cell Structures Involving Vertical and Horizontal Struts. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020074

AMA Style

Alwattar TA, Mian A. Developing an Equivalent Solid Material Model for BCC Lattice Cell Structures Involving Vertical and Horizontal Struts. Journal of Composites Science. 2020; 4(2):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alwattar, Tahseen A., and Ahsan Mian. 2020. "Developing an Equivalent Solid Material Model for BCC Lattice Cell Structures Involving Vertical and Horizontal Struts" Journal of Composites Science 4, no. 2: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020074

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop