Next Article in Journal
Sensing-Assisted UAV-BS Recovery for Invisible Evacuee Demand Along Predefined Evacuation Corridors
Previous Article in Journal
Temporally-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance in UAVs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances

1
College of Aviation Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 46 Nanchang Road, Guanghan 618307, China
2
Low Altitude Economy Industry Innovation Research Center, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 46 Nanchang Road, Guanghan 618307, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drones 2026, 10(7), 506; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10070506
Submission received: 11 May 2026 / Revised: 24 June 2026 / Accepted: 30 June 2026 / Published: 3 July 2026

Abstract

Typhoon-eye sensing places unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms in a setting where the wind field that carries the target signal also displaces aircraft, drains energy, weakens links, and increases failure risk. A rule that improves only routing or only motion can therefore move the swarm into another failure mode. This paper proposes a risk-driven cross-layer coordination scheme for such missions. A bounded risk index, computed from isolation, connectivity loss, and wind intensity, acts as a supervisory variable for multi-hop reachability maintenance, isolated-node recovery, and layered altitude adaptation. For evaluation, graph reachability is separated from useful data return through a degraded multi-hop aggregation model that includes distance loss, wind-dependent reliability, rain-induced packet loss, relay forwarding loss, and mothership collection capacity. The simulator combines a bounded Holland-type storm field, stochastic turbulence, nonlinear propulsion energy consumption, and wind-dependent structural failure. Against three literature-inspired baselines, two AI-inspired comparators, and six ablation variants, the method keeps a balanced profile across connectivity, isolation, wind exposure, data collection, and survival. In 30-run steady-state robustness tests under heavy-rain attenuation, the full strategy showed clear gains over routing-only and multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)-routing comparators in connectivity and isolation, but did not uniformly dominate topology reconstruction or the multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient–artificial potential field (MADDPG-APF) recovery comparator. The results indicate that, in storm-dominated swarm sensing, resilience comes mainly from coordinating exposure reduction with topology stabilization, rather than from optimizing a single layer.
Keywords: extreme wind disturbances; UAV swarm resilience; risk-aware coordination; multi-hop reachability; adaptive cross-layer control extreme wind disturbances; UAV swarm resilience; risk-aware coordination; multi-hop reachability; adaptive cross-layer control

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, T.; Yan, Y.; Hao, R.; Wang, Y. Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances. Drones 2026, 10, 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10070506

AMA Style

Liu S, Zhu X, Zhu T, Yan Y, Hao R, Wang Y. Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances. Drones. 2026; 10(7):506. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10070506

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Songlin, Xinyu Zhu, Tingyu Zhu, Yuehao Yan, Rui Hao, and Yuanfan Wang. 2026. "Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances" Drones 10, no. 7: 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10070506

APA Style

Liu, S., Zhu, X., Zhu, T., Yan, Y., Hao, R., & Wang, Y. (2026). Risk-Driven Cross-Layer Resilience Architecture for UAV Swarms Under Extreme Wind Disturbances. Drones, 10(7), 506. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones10070506

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop