Next Article in Journal
Arylthienyl-vinyl-benzothiazoles as Efficient Second Harmonic Generators (SHG) for Nonlinear Optics
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Occupational Stress Index and Lipid Profile among Professional Drivers in Ismailia City, Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Determining the Validity And Reproducibility of A Feeding Assessment Tool to Assess Nutrient Intake in New Zealand Infants Aged 9 to 12 Months †

1
School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
2
School of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
3
Liggins Institute and Department of Paediatrics, Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2018 Nutrition Society of New Zealand Annual Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 28–30 November 2018.
Proceedings 2019, 8(1), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019008053
Published: 14 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 2018 Annual Meeting of the Nutrition Society of New Zealand)
Background: Dietary assessment in infants is challenging but necessary to understand the relationship between nutrition and growth and development. However there are currently no simple, validated dietary assessment methods that assess nutrient intake in New Zealand infants. Our objective was to assess the relative validity and reproducibility of a complementary feeding questionnaire (CFQ) to determine nutrient intakes of New Zealand infants aged 9–12 months.
Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. Ninety-five parent-infant pairs (infant age 10 ± 1 months) completed the CFQ twice (CFQ-1 and CFQ-2), approximately 4 weeks apart. A four-day weighed food record (4dWFR) was collected on non-consecutive days between CFQ administrations. Validity and reproducibility were assessed for intakes of energy and 18 nutrients using paired t-tests, Pearson’s correlation coefficients, cross-classification and Bland-Altman analysis.
Results: Most nutrient intakes from the CFQ were comparable to the 4dWFR (range <1% to 28.2% different). Correlation coefficients ranged from r = 0.18 (saturated fat) to r = 0.81 (iron; mean r = 0.52). The majority of nutrients showed good cross-classification (>50% correctly classified and <10% grossly misclassified). Over half (53.9%) of participants were correctly classified by both methods (range 39.0% to 67.4%). Between 2.1% and 14.7% of participants (mean 7.1%) were grossly misclassified. Most nutrients showed acceptable agreement between methods (κ = 0.20–0.60). For reproducibility, all nutrients showed acceptable to good correlations (r ≥ 0.20), good cross-classification apart from fat and saturated fat (40.9% and 47.3%, respectively) and all had less than 10% grossly misclassified. All nutrients showed acceptable to good agreement (κ > 0.20).
Conclusions: The CFQ appears to have acceptable validity and good reproducibility for assessing nutrient intake in infants aged 9–12 months, making it a useful tool for use in future research.

Supplementary Material

The poster is available online atwww.mdpi.com/2504-3900/8/1/53/s1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Judd, A.; Beck, K.; McKinlay, C.; Conlon, C. Determining the Validity And Reproducibility of A Feeding Assessment Tool to Assess Nutrient Intake in New Zealand Infants Aged 9 to 12 Months. Proceedings 2019, 8, 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019008053

AMA Style

Judd A, Beck K, McKinlay C, Conlon C. Determining the Validity And Reproducibility of A Feeding Assessment Tool to Assess Nutrient Intake in New Zealand Infants Aged 9 to 12 Months. Proceedings. 2019; 8(1):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019008053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Judd, Amy, Kathryn Beck, Chris McKinlay, and Cathryn Conlon. 2019. "Determining the Validity And Reproducibility of A Feeding Assessment Tool to Assess Nutrient Intake in New Zealand Infants Aged 9 to 12 Months" Proceedings 8, no. 1: 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019008053

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop