1. Introduction
This work is focused on the study and analysis of planetary nebulae (PNe), the stellar objects that are generated when stars of low and intermediate mass, reaching their final phase of evolution, ionize the envelope that surrounds them. For this task, we have used the Gaia Data Release 2 (GDR2) database, which contains astrometric and photometric parameters of around 1.7 billion stellar objects, so its mining requires the use of big-data techniques. Gaia is an ESA satellite that was put into orbit in late 2013 with the aim of making a star map of the Milky Way.
The initial objective of our study was to generate a catalog of PNe, starting from different bibliographic sources and identifying their corresponding central stars (CSs) in Gaia DR2. To carry out this data mining process, we performed a cross-match between the known coordinates of the PNe and the coordinates of the sources in the Gaia DR2 database. As a result, a total of 1571 CSs with known parallaxes (angle of variation in the sky when observing an object between two opposite times of the year) were identified. From the parallaxes we can derive the distances at which the objects are. To do this, we use a Bayesian statistical approximation method, which assumes an exponentially decreasing probability density space for distances. Knowing the distance to the PNe has a great importance, since it allows us to calculate the intrinsic parameters of its CS from the observational ones. For a more detailed study, we selected those objects with the best astrometric accuracy, we called this sample the Golden Astrometry Planetary Nebulae (GAPN).
The Gaia archive also allows to search for stars gravitationally linked to the CSs of these PNe, which would form a binary star system. The presence of binary stars in PNe allow us to better understand the formation and evolution of this late stellar evolutionary phase, Boffin [
1]. It can also shed some light on its relationship with the aspherical morphologies of PNe.
2. Materials and Methods
The extremely precise measurements of parallaxes and proper motions (velocities in the plane of the sky) in Gaia DR2 has allowed us to search for co-moving stars in a region around each CS of the GAPN sample. Thus, we analyzed all the objects around each CS, and we selected those with coincidence in the astrometric parameters (parallaxes and proper motions) within their measurement errors, which would allow them to be classified as co-moving stars. To discard random coincidences, the probability density of the astrometric values in each field around the CSs was calculated, and the probability of finding an object with such coincident values with those of the CS was calculated, obtaining very low, practically negligible probabilities.
In addition, we also did an analysis about how the number of false matches increases as a function of the increase in the separation distance between both stars. To estimate this number of false matches, we analyzed an adjacent region to that of the CS with the same searching radius as the original region, and we obtained the number of co-moving objects to the CS in this area. By plotting the distribution of these false matches against the separation distance between the two stars, we were able to determine a maximum separation value for our selection of binary systems.
3. Results
By applying this searching procedure, we have been able to find eight binary systems as CSs of the PNe in our sample, with projected separations of less than 15,000 AU. One of them could even be a triple system. We have determined some astrometric parameters of these binary systems, as positions, proper motions or angular and physical separations. All these values can be consulted in
Table 1.
In addition, by obtaining the photometry of the companion stars, we were able to adjust their spectral energy distributions (SED) to theoretical models and then estimate their temperatures and luminosities. Moreover, by locating the companion stars in a color-magnitude diagram together with the PARSEC isochrones in Gaia DR2 passbands (Evans [
2]), we could estimate some of their evolutionary ages and masses. Thus, we had the possibility to compare all these parameters with the CSs ones, obtained in our previous work, González-Santamaría [
3].
4. Discussion
By using data mining methods and the accurate astrometry of Gaia, we have been able to select a small sample of CSPNe, with known and precise parallaxes, among a total of around 1.7 billion sources in Gaia DR2 database. Then, we have had the possibility to estimate their distances, and this knowledge has enabled us to derive their intrinsic properties from the observational ones.
Furthermore, the combination of the parallaxes with the proper motions has allowed us to search for companion stars to the CSs. We have applied quite strict selection criteria in order to avoid selecting any false co-moving object. We also have used a big-data method to estimate the probability of having select by chance any of the companion stars, by analysing the probability distribution of the astrometric parameters in the field around each of the CSs.
In the near future, with the launching of Gaia DR3, it is expected to be more quantity of astrometric data and with more accuracy. This will allow us to detect more binary systems associated to PNe.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.M. and A.M.; methodology, M.M., A.M. and I.G.-S.; software, I.G.-S.; investigation, I.G.-S., M.M. and A.M; writing–original draft preparation, I.G.-S. and M.M.; writing–review and editing, I.G.-S., M.M, C.D., A.M. and A.U.; supervision, M.M. and C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Funding from Spanish Ministry projects ESP2016-80079-C2-2-R, RTI2018-095076-BC22, Xunta de Galicia ED431B 2018/42, and AYA-2017-88254-P is acknowledged by the authors. M.M. thanks the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias for a visiting stay funded by the Severo Ochoa Excellence programme. IGS acknowledges financial support from the Spanish National Programme for the Promotion of Talent and its Employability grant BES-2017-083126 cofunded by the European Social Fund.
Acknowledgments
This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) Gaia mission and processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC). This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, HASH database, and the ALADIN applet.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Boffin, H.M.J.; Jones, D. The Importance of Binaries in the Formation and Evolution of Planetary Nebulae; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, D.W.; Riello, M.; De Angeli, F. Gaia Data Release 2. Photometric content and validation. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 616, A4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Santamaría, I.; Manteiga, M.; Manchado, A.; Ulla, A.; Dafonte, C. Properties of central stars of planetary nebulae with distances in Gaia DR2. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 630, A150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Astrometric data of the central and companion stars of each system.
Table 1.
Astrometric data of the central and companion stars of each system.
Object | RA | Dec | Parallax | Distance | Sep. | | |
---|
| (°) | (°) | (mas) | (pc) | (AU) | (mas/yr) | (mas/yr) |
---|
Abell 24 (CS) | 117.9065 | 3.0059 | 1.40 ± 0.15 | | - | | |
Abell 24 (B) | 117.9067 | 3.0021 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | | 9912 | | |
Abell 33 (CS) | 144.788 | −2.8084 | 1.01 ± 0.10 | | - | | |
Abell 33 (B) | 144.7878 | −2.8089 | 1.11 ± 0.09 | | 1542 | | |
Abell 34 (CS) | 146.3973 | −13.1711 | 0.83 ± 0.12 | | - | | |
Abell 34 (B) | 146.3954 | −13.1693 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | | 10,472 | | |
NGC 246 (CS) | 11.7639 | −11.872 | 1.92 ± 0.11 | | - | | |
NGC 246 (B) | 11.7647 | −11.8727 | 1.77 ± 0.06 | | 2118 | | |
NGC 3699 (CS) | 171.991 | −59.9579 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | | − | | |
NGC 3699 (B) | 171.9922 | −59.9585 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | | 5036 | | |
NGC 6853 (CS) | 299.9016 | 22.7212 | 2.63 ± 0.06 | | - | | |
NGC 6853 (B) | 299.9005 | 22.7197 | 2.56 ± 0.06 | | 2453 | | |
NGC 6853 (C) | 299.8997 | 22.7202 | 2.30 ± 0.52 | | 3322 | | |
PHR J1129-6012 (CS) | 172.4594 | −60.2022 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | | - | | |
PHR J1129-6012 (B) | 172.4573 | −60.2022 | 0.35 ± 0.09 | | 9551 | | |
PN SB 36 (CS) | 268.5868 | −39.1772 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | | - | | |
PN SB 36 (B) | 268.5831 | −39.1761 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | | 14,880 | | |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).