Next Article in Journal
Do GAP Practices Improve Market Access for Vegetable Farmers? A Case Study from Vientiane Capital, Laos
Previous Article in Journal
The BaSE Study: A Grounded Theory of Constructing Success for Bariatric Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Comparison of the Ionic Conductivity of Pure Imidazolium Nitrate and That Doped with a Lithium Nitrate Salt in Liquid and Gel Forms as Potential Electrolytes †

1
NAFOMAT Group, Departamentos de Física Aplicada y Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
MESTURAS Group, Departamento de Física y Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
3
Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, CIQUP-Centro de Investigaçao em Química da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, P-4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 23rd International Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 15 November–15 December 2019; Available online: https://ecsoc-23.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2019, 41(1), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-23-06520
Published: 14 November 2019

Abstract

:
Current electrolytes for electrochemical energy storage devices are made of solvents, which often present problems of flammability, corrosion and high toxicity. Ionic liquids and mixtures with metal salts are proposed as a good selection for safer electrolytes due to their properties such as, among others, non-flammability, negligible vapor pressure, high ionic conductivity and wide electrochemical window. In this work, the electrical conductivity of solutions of the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate ([EIm][NO3]) with lithium nitrate salt in three different concentrations is analyzed for liquid and gel states. The temperature and salt concentration dependences of electrical conductivity are studied for liquid and gel states. As expected, an increase in conductivity with temperature and a decrease with salt concentration were observed, except for the case of gel [EIm][NO3] with a salt concentration of 0.5 m, which shows a small increase in conductivity compared to the pure gel. Comparison of the conductivity of the liquid and gel states shows a significant increase for the gel state at low concentrations of the added salt.

1. Introduction

The increasing demand for batteries has led industry and academia to focus on improving the performance, safety and cost of lithium battery technology. Replacing the flammable electrolytes used in current batteries with non-flammable compounds, for example ionic liquids (ILs) doped with inorganic salts containing relevant metals for this electrochemical application [1,2], can be an important step to achieve these improvements.
ILs are nanostructured green compounds considered as a new class of solvents, whose properties can be appropriately tuned (designer solvents) by choosing combinations of cations and anions from the large number of currently known IL moieties.
Recent studies suggest the possibility of using sol–gel electrolytes [3] in electrochemical devices to improve the safety of the electrolyte and facilitate its manipulation, although the behavior of some key properties such as ionic conductivity after gelation have not been studied in depth, with some contradictory results found in the literature.
In this work, the effect of gelation and the influence of lithium salt doping of the ionogel of ethylimidazolium nitrate ionic liquid are analyzed in terms of ionic conductivity against temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Solutions of IL [EIm][NO3] with lithium salt (LiNO3) were prepared via stirring/mixing at three different concentrations (0.5, 1 and 3 mol·kg−1). Chemical structures and further identification of chemical compounds (CAS registry number, molecular weight, etc.) can be found in Table 1. Furthermore, detailed information on the mixtures can be found in Table 2.
[EIm][NO3]–lithium salt mixtures were dried via a vacuum procedure for 24–48 h in order to remove water content. The residual quantity of water was measured using a Karl Fischer titrator, and quantities of water lower than 100 ppm were obtained.

2.2. Gelation Routes

A main procedure for the sol–gel route in order to prepare gel samples was carried out, using an adaptation of the method described by Garaga et al. [4]. A brief description of the selected method is the following:
  • The volume proportions of the sample mixtures were 3 parts of EtOH, 0.428 of TEOS and 1 of [EIm][NO3] (or mixture), and then these mixtures were stirred in a round flask for at least 60 min.
  • After that, they were transferred to a vial, where the mixture was stored in a furnace at 40 °C until ethanol was completely evaporated (7–8 days).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Electrical Conductivity

With the purpose of obtaining electrical conductivity (σ), a conductimeter GLP31 from CRISON was used at a constant frequency of 500 Hz. The resolution of this conductivity meter is better than 1% of the measured value; the minimum and maximum values registered by CRISON GLP31 are 0.2 µS·cm−1 and 100 mS·cm−1, respectively. The probe is formed by two parallel flat platinum plates, which can take measurements in the case of liquid or gel samples in a temperature range from 243 to 323 K. A calibrated Julabo F25 thermostat was used to control the temperature of the sample; the error in the temperature was lower than 0.1 K. These measurements need to be taken in an isothermal regime, so the time spent on each measurement was at least 15 min while there was no phase transition. When phase transition took place, the time spent on the measurement was more than 30 min.

4. Results

Figure 1 shows the ionic conductivity of IL–salt mixtures versus temperature for (a) liquid form and (b) gel form. An increase in conductivity with temperature can be seen for all samples. The temperature dependence of the ionic conductivity of all the samples was found to be well described by the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) equation [5]. On the other hand, a clear decrease in conductivity with the salt concentration in liquid state is also observed, and different behavior can be observed for gel form (Figure 1b), characterized by an increase in conductivity until a maximum value around 0.5 molsalt/kg, followed by a decrease with further salt addition.
An increase in conductivity for the lowest studied concentration of salt addition in gel state can be clearly seen in Figure 2, which shows the conductivity vs. molality curves for different temperatures.
This behavior agrees with Garaga et al. [4], who found an enhancement of ionic mobility after gelation using silica micro-particles, although to our knowledge, studies about the behavior of conductivity with salt addition in gel form have not been previously performed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the FEDER Program through the project MAT2017-89239-C2-1-P, and by the Xunta de Galicia through the GRC ED431C 2016/001 project and the Galician Network of Ionic Liquids (ReGaLIs) ED431D 2017/06. P. Vallet and J. J. Parajó thank funding support from the FPI Program of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Education and Universities and the I2C postdoctoral Program of the Xunta de Galicia, respectively.

References

  1. Salgado, J.; Parajó, J.J.; Villanueva, M.; Rodríguez, J.R.; Cabeza, O.; Varela, L.M. Liquid range of ionic liquid—Metal salt mixtures for electrochemical applications. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019, 134, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. MacFarlane, D.R.; Tachikawa, N.; Forsyth, M.; Pringle, J.M.; Howlett, P.C.; Elliott, G.D.; Davis, J.H.; Watanabe, M.; Simon, P.; Angell, C.A. Energy applications of ionic liquids. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nègre, L.; Daffos, B.; Turq, V.; Taberna, P.L.; Simon, P. Ionogel-based solid-state supercapacitor operating over a wide range of temperature. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 206, 490–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Garaga, M.N.; Aguilera, L.; Yaghini, N.; Matic, A.; Persson, M.; Martinelli, A. Achieving enhanced ionic mobility in nanoporous silica by controlled surface interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 5727–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Timachova, K.; Chintapalli, M.; Olson, K.R.; Mecham, S.J.; DeSimone, J.M.; Balsara, N.P. Mechanism of ion transport in perfluoropolyether electrolytes with a lithium salt. Soft Matter 2017, 13, 5389–5396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Electrical conductivity vs. temperature measured in a cooling ramp for (a) liquid and (b) gel forms. Lines in the figure correspond to Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) fitting curves in liquid and gel forms.
Figure 1. Electrical conductivity vs. temperature measured in a cooling ramp for (a) liquid and (b) gel forms. Lines in the figure correspond to Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann (VFT) fitting curves in liquid and gel forms.
Proceedings 41 00056 g001
Figure 2. Electrical conductivity vs. temperature in a cooling ramp for (a) liquid and (b) gel states.
Figure 2. Electrical conductivity vs. temperature in a cooling ramp for (a) liquid and (b) gel states.
Proceedings 41 00056 g002
Table 1. Identification of the chemicals used in this work.
Table 1. Identification of the chemicals used in this work.
NameMolecular Weight (g·mol−1)StructureCAS NumberProvenance
Ethyl Imidazolium Nitrate159.14Proceedings 41 00056 i001[EIm][NO3] 501693-38-5Iolitec
Lithium Nitrate68.946Proceedings 41 00056 i002LiNO3 7790-69-4Sigma Aldrich
Tetraethoxysilane208.33Proceedings 41 00056 i003TEOS 78-10-4Sigma Aldrich
Table 2. Molality of the studied samples and mass of pure metal salts per 100 g of pure ionic liquid (IL).
Table 2. Molality of the studied samples and mass of pure metal salts per 100 g of pure ionic liquid (IL).
[EIm][NO3] + LiNO3Molality/moltsalt·kg−1[EIm][NO3]Pure Salt Mass/g (100 g of IL)−1
Pure--
Li 0.5 m0.53.5
Li 1 m16.89
Li 3 m320.68
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vallet, P.; Parajó, J.J.; Sotuela, F.; López, M.V.; Cabeza, Ó.; Varela, L.M.; Salgado, J. Comparison of the Ionic Conductivity of Pure Imidazolium Nitrate and That Doped with a Lithium Nitrate Salt in Liquid and Gel Forms as Potential Electrolytes. Proceedings 2019, 41, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-23-06520

AMA Style

Vallet P, Parajó JJ, Sotuela F, López MV, Cabeza Ó, Varela LM, Salgado J. Comparison of the Ionic Conductivity of Pure Imidazolium Nitrate and That Doped with a Lithium Nitrate Salt in Liquid and Gel Forms as Potential Electrolytes. Proceedings. 2019; 41(1):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-23-06520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vallet, Pablo, Juan José Parajó, Félix Sotuela, María Villanueva López, Óscar Cabeza, Luis Miguel Varela, and Josefa Salgado. 2019. "Comparison of the Ionic Conductivity of Pure Imidazolium Nitrate and That Doped with a Lithium Nitrate Salt in Liquid and Gel Forms as Potential Electrolytes" Proceedings 41, no. 1: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-23-06520

APA Style

Vallet, P., Parajó, J. J., Sotuela, F., López, M. V., Cabeza, Ó., Varela, L. M., & Salgado, J. (2019). Comparison of the Ionic Conductivity of Pure Imidazolium Nitrate and That Doped with a Lithium Nitrate Salt in Liquid and Gel Forms as Potential Electrolytes. Proceedings, 41(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-23-06520

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop