Next Article in Journal
Amphidinolides and Iriomoteolides, Potent Anticancer Macrolides
Previous Article in Journal
Design of New Probes for Oxidized Amino Acids Localization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Why Does the Type of Halogen Atom Matter for Radiosensitizing Properties of 5-Substituted 4-Thio-2′-Deoxyuridines? †

1
Laboratory of Biological Sensitizers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Centre of Radiation Research and Technology, Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd Molecules Medicinal Chemistry Symposium (MMCS): Facing Novel Challenges in Drug Discovery, Barcelona, Spain, 15–17 May 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 22(1), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019022040
Published: 8 August 2019
In order to explain the unexpected difference between radiosensitizing properties of the two studied derivatives, an experimentally-theoretical study combining stationary and pulse radiolysis with quantum-mechanical calculations was carried out. Thus, the extent of radiolysis as well as the identity and amount of stable products were assayed with the HPLC and LC-MS methods. Furthermore, pulse radiolysis experiments enabled the kinetics and spectra characteristics of transients to be characterized. The experimental results were complemented with density functional theory (DFT) calculations on the thermodynamics and kinetics of dissociative electron attachment (DEA) to the studied compounds and possible secondary reactions.
Our results indicate that the difference observed in the cellular experiments can be attributed to different activation barriers of the DEA process. Indeed, the dissociation of the 5-iodo-4-thio-2′-deoxyuridine anion is a swift process leading to the reactive 4-thio-5-uridyl radical which, if formed in DNA, may lead to serious damage. On the other hand, a larger activation barrier for DEA to 5-bromo-4-thio-2′-deoxyuridine prevents the release of the bromide anion due to competing processes, such as electron autodetachment, protonation, etc.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spisz, P.; Zdrowowicz, M.; Makurat, S.; Kozak, W.; Skotnicki, K.; Bobrowski, K.; Rak, J. Why Does the Type of Halogen Atom Matter for Radiosensitizing Properties of 5-Substituted 4-Thio-2′-Deoxyuridines? Proceedings 2019, 22, 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019022040

AMA Style

Spisz P, Zdrowowicz M, Makurat S, Kozak W, Skotnicki K, Bobrowski K, Rak J. Why Does the Type of Halogen Atom Matter for Radiosensitizing Properties of 5-Substituted 4-Thio-2′-Deoxyuridines? Proceedings. 2019; 22(1):40. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019022040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spisz, Paulina, Magdalena Zdrowowicz, Samanta Makurat, Witold Kozak, Konrad Skotnicki, Krzysztof Bobrowski, and Janusz Rak. 2019. "Why Does the Type of Halogen Atom Matter for Radiosensitizing Properties of 5-Substituted 4-Thio-2′-Deoxyuridines?" Proceedings 22, no. 1: 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019022040

APA Style

Spisz, P., Zdrowowicz, M., Makurat, S., Kozak, W., Skotnicki, K., Bobrowski, K., & Rak, J. (2019). Why Does the Type of Halogen Atom Matter for Radiosensitizing Properties of 5-Substituted 4-Thio-2′-Deoxyuridines? Proceedings, 22(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019022040

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop