Study of the Thermal Conductivity of Different Geothermal Grouting Materials with a Homemade Apparatus †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sáez Blázquez, C.; Farfán Martín, C.; Martín Nieto, A.; Carrasco García, P.; Sánchez Pérez, D.; González-Aguilera, D. Analysis and study of different grouting materials in vertical geothermal closed-loop systems. Renew. Energy 2017, 114, 1189–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indacoechea Vega, I.; Pascual Muñoz, P.; Castro Fresno, D.; Calzada Pérez, M.A. Experimental characterization and performance evaluation of geothermal grouting materials subjected to heating–cooling cycles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montes, J.M.; Cuevas, F.G.; Cintas, J. Ciencia e Ingeniería de los Materiales, 1st ed.; Ediciones Paraninfo S.A.: Madrid, Spain, 2014; pp. 675–676. [Google Scholar]
- Dos Santos, W.N.; Gregório, R. Numerical and experimental determination of minimum and maximum measuring times for the hot wire parallel technique. Cerâmica 2003, 49, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample | Cement | Silica Sand | Bentonite | Water | Superplasticizer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | x | x | |||
M2 | x | x | x | ||
M3 | x | x | x | x | |
M4 | x | x | x | x |
Sample | s/c | b/c | w/c | w/b | r/c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | 4 | ||||
M2 | 0.25 | 0.02 | |||
M3 | 2 | 0.42 | 0.02 | ||
M4 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.02 |
Literature | Shotherm QTM-F1 | MCT | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | λLiterature | λShotherm QTM-F1 | λMCT | Deviation to | Deviation to |
[W/m∙K] | [W/m∙K] | [W/m∙K] | λLiteratura | λShotherm QTM-F1 | |
M1 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | +0.00 | −1.41 |
M2 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.82 | +2.50 | +3.80 |
M3 | 1.50 | 1.63 | 1.58 | +5.33 | −3.07 |
M4 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.81 | +1.25 | −3.57 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Castán-Fernández, C.; Marcos-Robredo, G.; Rey-Ronco, M.Á.; Alonso-Sánchez, T. Study of the Thermal Conductivity of Different Geothermal Grouting Materials with a Homemade Apparatus. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231497
Castán-Fernández C, Marcos-Robredo G, Rey-Ronco MÁ, Alonso-Sánchez T. Study of the Thermal Conductivity of Different Geothermal Grouting Materials with a Homemade Apparatus. Proceedings. 2018; 2(23):1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231497
Chicago/Turabian StyleCastán-Fernández, Carlos, Germán Marcos-Robredo, Miguel Ángel Rey-Ronco, and Teresa Alonso-Sánchez. 2018. "Study of the Thermal Conductivity of Different Geothermal Grouting Materials with a Homemade Apparatus" Proceedings 2, no. 23: 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231497
APA StyleCastán-Fernández, C., Marcos-Robredo, G., Rey-Ronco, M. Á., & Alonso-Sánchez, T. (2018). Study of the Thermal Conductivity of Different Geothermal Grouting Materials with a Homemade Apparatus. Proceedings, 2(23), 1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231497