Next Article in Journal
Sparse Semi-Functional Partial Linear Single-Index Regression
Previous Article in Journal
Computationally Efficient Bootstrap Expressions for Bandwidth Selection in Nonparametric Curve Estimation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Extended Abstract

Guidelines to Support Graphical User Interface Design for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Interdisciplinary Approach †

by
Betania Groba
1,2,*,
Nereida Canosa
1,2 and
Patricia Concheiro-Moscoso
1,2
1
Research group Artificial Neural Networks and Adaptive Systems-Centre of Medical Informatics and Radiological Diagnosis (RNASA-IMEDIR), Research Center on Information and Communication Technologies (CITIC), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
2
Institute for Biomedical Research (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XoveTIC Congress, A Coruña, Spain, 27–28 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(18), 1177; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2181177
Published: 17 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of XoveTIC Congress 2018)

Abstract

:
The study aims to describe the guidelines to support user interface design for develop technology centered in the specific learning style, abilities and needs of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This research study describes the conclusions drawn following a process of interactive design of software, ASD Module, In-TIC PC. Four groups of participants were involved in the process: specialists with experience in the intervention with people with ASD, specialists with experience in the development and design of technology for people with disability, children with ASD and their families (n = 39). The techniques used to formalize the collection of information from different groups of participants were observation, interview, group discussions and a questionnaire. The results of the study target the development of a design guide that includes the evidence, the basic ideas and suggestions deduced from the design and development process of the ASD Module. This translates into a list of rules with suggestions to consider in the design and adaptation of technology for children with ASD. These guidelines of interface design provide useful information for researchers, developers, social and healthcare professionals and families, with the aim of offering alternatives for children with ASD and facilitating the understanding of daily life.

1. Introduction

The type of technology used in interventions with people with ASD is varied: computers, mobile devices, video recordings, robots and virtual reality. In the last two decades, software developed in this field has increased in numbers [1]. In this regard, a clear example is the free or low-cost initiatives that offer technological solutions for people with ASD.
Technology developers expressed a clear interest to design programs that met the needs of this population [2,3,4]. Therefore, at present, not much evidence describes the developmental and design procedure that allows generating technology centered in the specific learning style, abilities and needs of children with ASD.

2. Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study design was employed. The Autonomous Ethics Committee of Research in Galicia approved the protocol (code: 2014/558).

2.1. Participants and Settings

Four groups of respondents were participated in the study (n = 39): Professionals with experience in the intervention with people with ASD (first group); Professionals with experience in the development and design of technology for people with disability (second group); Family members of people with ASD (third group) and children with ASD (fourth group).

2.2. Procedure

Research has been based on user-centered design and has followed an iterative procedure. This is a cyclical process, divided into the following phases:
  • Study and analysis of the recent scientific evidence on the design of technology for people with ASD. Participants: 2nd Group.
  • Study and analysis of the recent scientific evidence on the skills and ways of processing information by people with ASD. Participants: 2nd Group.
  • Observation, analysis and discussion on the skills and ways of processing of this population and their influence on the design of technology. Participants: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Groups.
  • Design and development of the application. Participants: 2nd Group.
  • Software testing by professionals and family members of people with ASD. Participants: 1st and 3rd Groups.
  • Software quality improvement. Participants: 2nd Group.
  • After this iterative process, the resulting application was tested by the 4th Group, that is, children with ASD.

3. Results

The result of the study targets the development of a design guide that includes the evidence, the basic ideas and suggestions deduced from the design and development process of the ASD Module. This translates into a list of rules with suggestions to consider in the customization and adaptation of technology for people with ASD. The rules extracted from the process are listed below:
  • The Software and its Contents Are Based on a Person’s Abilities, Desires and Interests
  • The Design of the Interface is Simple and the Information Displayed is Simplified
  • Use of Images to Display Information
  • The Images Convey the Meaning of the Actual Element
  • The Use of Images Allows Users to Adapt According to their Level of Visual Cognition
  • The Image is Accompanied by the Written Word
  • Speech Synthesis is Used to Facilitate Communication or as Reinforcement to the Command
  • The Information is Displayed in a Multimodal Way (Visual and Auditory) and it is Adapted According to the Sensory Style Preferred by each Child
  • The Background Color is Used to Facilitate the Information Processing
  • The User has the Possibility to Customize all Relevant Aspects

4. Discussion

Some of the most complex decisions are related to the differences in the perception of people with ASD. In connection with this, it is explained that people with ASD process visual information more easily [3,5,6,7,8,9], although it is generally assumed that it is increasingly necessary to evaluate the sensory style of each person. Similarly, it is understood that the simultaneous display of auditory and visual stimuli help to learn, but in some cases, people with ASD need to be provided with information through their preferred sensory channel [3,10].
Finally, one of the premises supported by almost all the literature is the need for customization of technology.

5. Conclusions

This list of rules for technology design and customization provides useful information for researchers, developers, social and healthcare professionals and families, with the aim of offering alternatives for children with ASD and facilitating the understanding of daily life.

Author Contributions

B.G. and, N.C. conceived and designed the experiment; B.G. performed the experiment; N.C. and P.C.-M. analyzed the data; B.G., N.C. and P.C.-M. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank participants in the project for their contributions, knowledge and time. We would also like to thank families, professionals and children of aÚPa (children’s and baby’s clinic of Psychology and Physiotherapy of A Coruña). This study was supported by the Orange Foundation in Spain and the Spanish Ministry for Industry, Commerce and Tourism through Avanza Program. This work was partially supported by Galician Innovation Agency (GAIN) through Conecta-PEME Program-3rd edition (GERIA-TIC Project: IN852A 2016/10); the Carlos III Health Institute from the Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation 2013–2016 (CICLOGEN: PI17/01826) and the European Regional Development Funds (FEDER)—“A way to build Europe”. In addition, this work has received financial support from the Xunta de Galicia (Centro singular de investigación de Galicia accreditation 2016–2019) and the European Union (ED431G/01; GRC2014/049), the Galician Network of Drugs R+D REGID (ED431D 2017/16), and the Galician Network for Colorectal Cancer Research-REGICC (ED431D 2017/23), funded by Xunta de Galicia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bölte, S. Computer-based intervention in autism spectrum disorders. In Focus on Autism Research; Ryaskin, O.T., Ed.; Nova Biomedical: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 247–260. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, M.; Pitt, I. Interaction design: A multidimensional approach for learners with autism. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference for Interacting Design and Children [Internet], Tampere, Finland, 7–9 June 2006; pp. 33–36. Available online: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1139086 (accessed on 7 September 2018).
  3. Bogdashina, O. Percepción Sensorial en Autismo y Asperger; Autismo Ávila: Ávila, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moore, M.; Calvert, S. Brief report: vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: Teacher or computer instruction. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2000, 30, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gaffrey, M.S.; Kleinhans, N.M.; Haist, F.; Akshoomoff, N.; Campbell, A.; Courchesne, E.; Müller, R.A. Atypical [corrected] participation of visual cortex during word processing in autism: An fMRI study of semantic decision. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45, 1672–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Grandin, T. Pensar con Imágenes: Mi Vida Con el Autismo; Alba: Barcelona, Spain, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kana, R.K.; Keller, T.A.; Cherkassky, V.L.; Minshew, N.J.; Just, M.A. Sentence comprehension in autism: Thinking in pictures with decreased functional connectivity. Brain 2006, 129, 2484–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mesibov, G.; Howley, M. El Acceso al Currículo Para Alumnos Con TEA; TEACCH Program; Autismo Ávila: Ávila, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Stromer, R.; Kimball, J.W.; Kinney, E.M.; Taylor, B.A. Activity schedules, computer technology, and teaching children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 2006, 21, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tomchek, S.D.; Dunn, W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2007, 61, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Groba, B.; Canosa, N.; Concheiro-Moscoso, P. Guidelines to Support Graphical User Interface Design for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2181177

AMA Style

Groba B, Canosa N, Concheiro-Moscoso P. Guidelines to Support Graphical User Interface Design for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Proceedings. 2018; 2(18):1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2181177

Chicago/Turabian Style

Groba, Betania, Nereida Canosa, and Patricia Concheiro-Moscoso. 2018. "Guidelines to Support Graphical User Interface Design for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Interdisciplinary Approach" Proceedings 2, no. 18: 1177. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2181177

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop