Previous Article in Journal
Reproductive Strategies of the European Catfish at Its Southern Invasion Front: Insights from the Tagus River
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Commercial Fishing as a Complementary Action for Invasive Fish Management in the Cedillo Reservoir †

1
MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre/ARNET—Aquatic Research Network, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
2
cE3c—Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XI Iberian Congress of Ichthyology, Vila Real, Portugal, 23–27 June 2026.
Presenting author (Oral Presentation).
Proceedings 2026, 146(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026146003 (registering DOI)
Published: 16 June 2026

Abstract

Introduction: The most common method for controlling invasive fishes is mechanical removal, although it is time-consuming and operationally demanding. In Portugal, commercial inland fisheries are permitted, but the extent to which they could represent a complementary tool for invasive species control remains unknown. Objective: We compared fish assemblages in two sections of a branch of the Cedillo Reservoir where commercial fishing is allowed (i.e., downstream the Lentiscais bridge) and where it is prohibited under the regulations of the International Tagus Natural Park (i.e., upstream). Methodology: Fish were sampled in 2023 and 2024, using a total of 116 gillnets: 72 downstream and 44 upstream. The proportion of blank nets between sections was compared using Fisher’s exact test. Variations in community composition were assessed using NMDS and PERMANOVA, while homogeneity of multivariate dispersion was evaluated with PERMDISP. Total CPUE was compared between sections using Mann–Whitney tests. At the species level, CPUE were assessed using permutation-based Mann–Whitney U tests adjusted for multiple comparisons using the FDR procedure. The direction and magnitude of between-section differences were quantified using the rank-biserial correlation, and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by section-stratified bootstrap resampling. Results: In total, 20 gillnets yielded no fish, and there was no significant difference in their proportions between sections. Total CPUE per gillnet was significantly higher upstream than in the commercially fished section. Fish assemblage composition differed significantly between sections, and there were no dissimilarities in multivariate dispersion, indicating a genuine, although partial, separation between assemblages. The species contributing most to the dissimilarity between the two sections were Silurus glanis, Cyprinus carpio, Sander lucioperca, and Luciobarbus bocagei, which are also among the main target species for national inland commercial fisheries. Among these species, L. bocagei and S. glanis showed significantly lower CPUE in the commercially fished section, while S. lucioperca showed higher CPUE. Variations in C. carpio CPUE were barely significant. Conclusions: These results suggest that commercial fishing may at least partially influence fish catches and assemblage structure in this reservoir branch. Future studies should partition the influence of commercial fishing from other drivers of assemblage variation to further evaluate whether it may represent a complementary tool for managing fish invasions under specific management strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R., F.R. and F.M.; methodology, R.R., F.R. and F.M.; formal analysis, R.R.; investigation, R.R., C.G., D.D., B.C., M.M., D.R. and F.R.; data curation, R.R., C.G., D.D., B.C., M.M., D.R. and F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.R.; writing—review and editing, R.R., C.G., D.D., B.C., M.M., D.R., F.M. and F.R.; supervision, F.R.; project administration, F.R.; funding acquisition, F.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the LIFE PREDATOR project (ref: 101074458; LIFE21-NAT-IT-PREDATOR). MARE was financed by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. (UID/04292/2025, https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04292/2025) and the PRR (UID/PRR/04292/2025, https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/PRR/04292/2025). ARNET (LA/P/0069/2020, https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0069/2020), cE3c (UID/00329/2025), and CHANGE (https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0121/2020) were supported by Portuguese National Funds through FCT. DD was supported by FCT with a PhD grant (2023.01409.BD, https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.01409.BD). RR was supported by national funds through FCT under the Scientific Employment Stimulus—Individual Call (2024.09047.CEECIND).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rivaes, R.; Gkenas, C.; Dias, D.; Castro, B.; Moncada, M.; Ribeiro, D.; Magalhães, F.; Ribeiro, F. Commercial Fishing as a Complementary Action for Invasive Fish Management in the Cedillo Reservoir. Proceedings 2026, 146, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026146003

AMA Style

Rivaes R, Gkenas C, Dias D, Castro B, Moncada M, Ribeiro D, Magalhães F, Ribeiro F. Commercial Fishing as a Complementary Action for Invasive Fish Management in the Cedillo Reservoir. Proceedings. 2026; 146(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026146003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rivaes, Rui, Christos Gkenas, Diogo Dias, Beatriz Castro, Mafalda Moncada, Diogo Ribeiro, Filomena Magalhães, and Filipe Ribeiro. 2026. "Commercial Fishing as a Complementary Action for Invasive Fish Management in the Cedillo Reservoir" Proceedings 146, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026146003

APA Style

Rivaes, R., Gkenas, C., Dias, D., Castro, B., Moncada, M., Ribeiro, D., Magalhães, F., & Ribeiro, F. (2026). Commercial Fishing as a Complementary Action for Invasive Fish Management in the Cedillo Reservoir. Proceedings, 146(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026146003

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop