Next Article in Journal
Preface of the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025
Previous Article in Journal
Temporal Anchors and Cognitive Scaffolding: A Content Analysis of Complex Narrative Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Visual Education and Educational Innovation. An Exploratory Study in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Laboratories for the Training of Support Teachers in Nursery Schools †

Department of Education Sciences, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70100 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Learning and Teaching Strategies Mediated by Visual Education: Horizons of Research and Action (ASTERA 2025), Bari, Italy, 2 October 2025.
Proceedings 2026, 139(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139012
Published: 3 April 2026

Abstract

This paper presents the results of exploratory research conducted as part of a university specialisation course for future support teachers in nursery schools during ICT (Information and Communication Technology) workshops. The main objective of the study was to investigate the role and potential of visual education in teaching–learning processes in academia, particularly in educational contexts aimed at building inclusive and innovative skills. In line with the studies by and, the research analysed how the integration of digital visual tools, multimedia narratives and gamification practices can affect motivation, engagement and the development of digital, communication and pedagogical skills. The results confirm the educational value of visual education as a lever for building inclusive and reflective skills. The methodological approach adopted is inspired by the learning by doing paradigm and active learning, promoting participatory and innovative teaching, consistent with the latest reflections on academic innovation.

1. Introduction

In recent years, pedagogical thinking has progressively recognised the heuristic and educational value of visual methods and iconic artefacts [1]. Within an epistemological and methodological framework, these tools highlight the multimodal dimension of knowledge and the plurality of languages that characterise contemporary educational processes. Despite the interest in the literature towards the use of visual methods and iconic artefacts in empirical research [2,3], their systematic use in university-level teacher education remains limited [4].

2. Theoretical Framework

Visual education, understood as an approach that integrates images, symbols and multimedia narratives, is part of a multimodal learning paradigm. This perspective, in line with the principles of learning by doing and active learning [5,6], frames teaching as a reflective and participatory process, in which visual experience and storytelling become tools for the co-construction of knowledge. Recent literature [7,8] also emphasises how gamification and digital storytelling enhance student engagement, motivation, and participation, fostering experiential and inclusive learning. Play has always aroused the interest of scholars from different fields of study, attracting the attention of anthropologists [9], sociologists [10], psychologists [11,12], pedagogues, and philosophers both in terms of its social and cognitive function and in terms of the surprising generative motivational drive it gives learners [7]. Theoretical and practical research, at national and international level, has been enriched by numerous contributions to the application of the playful dimension in the field of education, which increasingly refer to play-centred learning models [13,14].

3. Methodology

This contribution explores the role and potential of visual education as a tool in teaching–learning processes to promote inclusive training courses and innovative skills. The collaborative research was conducted according to a phenomenological self-study methodological protocol (Figure 1).
It was conducted at an ICT laboratory at the University of Bari A. Moro, aimed at students on the specialisation course for support in the nursery school segment. To make the research design more explicit, the study was structured as a pre–post exploratory study aimed at identifying possible changes in participants’ perceptions and self-reported competences following the training intervention.
The research was developed based on a number of key questions:
How can the integration of visual digital tools affect the motivation and engagement of university students in support training? Is it possible to outline a training model that integrates these tools to support reflective, participatory and inclusion-oriented teaching?
The survey was divided into three main phases:
Ø Design and implementation of an ICT (Information and Communication Technology) workshop aimed at students enrolled in the specialisation course for support.
Ø Experimentation with digital tools geared towards visual education, digital storytelling and gamification [4], through activities that involved the use of applications such as Book Creator and Vocaroo for the creation of multimedia narratives, and LearningApps and Panquiz for the design of educational games (visual quizzes, associations, memory and narrative sequences).
Ø Data collection and analysis, through the administration of an initial and final questionnaire with multiple-choice questions. The Computer Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) questionnaires, constructed using Google Forms consisting of 14 close-ended questions, complied with ethics and privacy regulations: Compliance with EU Regulation 679/2016, Legislative Decree 196/2003 and 101/2018. In addition, students were asked for their consent for the collection and anonymous use of research data.

Context, Participants

The survey targeted a sample of students enrolled in the specialisation course for support in the nursery school segment attending the ICT laboratory. The sample consisted of 70 students aged between 30 and 60. The student population involved was almost entirely female, aged between 30 and 60 (average); 65 students with secondary school qualifications (teaching diploma for access to teaching in nursery schools) and 5 students with degrees in Primary Education Sciences. The questionnaire consisted of 14 close-ended questions and was built around three analytical dimensions derived from the theoretical framework: (1) digital competences, (2) motivation and engagement in the use of educational technologies, and (3) pedagogical awareness regarding the use of visual and narrative tools in designing inclusive activities.

4. Results

The Table 1 shows the data from the answers to the questions on which this study focuses. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical procedures, specifically frequency counts and percentages. The comparison between pre-intervention and post-intervention responses allowed for the identification of trends and changes in participants’ perceptions and self-reported competences
The results of the analysis conducted on the questions administered before the workshop are reported below.
In terms of digital competence, the data show that most participants are at an intermediate level (71%, or 50 students), followed by a group of beginners (21%, or 15 students) and a minority who claim to be at an advanced level (7%, or 5 students). No participant indicated an expert level, suggesting a need to strengthen more complex and reflective digital skills. Regarding initial perceptions of ICT training, 60% of participants expressed positive expectations, while a further 10% said they were confident about the effectiveness of the training programme. No respondents expressed doubts or mistrust, a sign of a favourable attitude towards learning and an overall positive perception of the educational potential of technology. The section dedicated to knowledge of specific digital applications reveals a varied picture: the Book Creator app is known “fairly well” by 60 students and “poorly” by 10; the Vocaroo app is known “fairly well” by 5 students, “poorly” by 50 and “not at all” by 10; the LearningApps app is known “fairly well” by 5 students, “a little” by 50 and “not at all” by 15;s and the PanQuiz app is indicated as known “fairly well” by 15 students, “a little” by 50 and “not at all” by 5. Overall, the data outline a predominantly intermediate level of competence, accompanied by positive attitudes towards digital training, but also by uneven knowledge of the operational tools. This suggests the need for targeted training interventions aimed at promoting a more conscious, creative and pedagogically oriented use of digital technologies in teaching practice.
The Table 2 below shows the results after the workshop intervention.
The analysis of data relating to perceptions of the training programme paints an overall positive picture, consistent with the objectives of the course. With regard to the clarity of the training objectives, almost all participants expressed fully favourable assessments: 60 students (86%) considered them very clear, while 10 students (14%) considered them fairly clear. No one reported difficulties in understanding or perceptions of uncertainty. With regard to the duration of the course and the workload, 50 students (71%) considered them entirely adequate and 15 (21%) fairly adequate; only 5 students (7%) perceived the course as a little too demanding, and no one as definitely excessive. With regard to the effectiveness of the visual materials used to support learning, the responses indicate a high level of satisfaction: 60 students (86%) said that these materials helped them greatly in understanding the topics, and 10 (14%) considered them quite useful. Similarly, the digital applications presented in the course were rated as very interesting by 60 students (86%) and quite interesting by 9 (13%), while only 1 participant (1%) expressed limited interest. The recreational activities proposed showed strong potential for engagement: 60 students (86%) found them very engaging, 9 (13%) found them quite engaging and 1 (1%) found them not very engaging. With regard to the perceived improvement in digital skills, 60 course participants (86%) believe they have significantly improved their skills, while 10 (14%) report a partial improvement; no one stated that they had not benefited from the training. When asked about their intention to use what they had learned in their teaching practice, 50 participants (71%) answered yes, definitely and 20 (29%) answered yes, partly. No one showed resistance or lack of interest in applying the skills acquired. Finally, the data on overall satisfaction show a high level of appreciation: 60 participants (86%) said they were very satisfied and 10 (14%) were fairly satisfied. No negative responses were recorded. Overall, the results suggest a high degree of satisfaction and active participation, with general recognition of the clarity, consistency and usefulness of the training course, as well as the pedagogical value of the methodologies adopted, in particular those based on play and the conscious use of digital technologies.

5. Discussion

Analysis of the questionnaires revealed a significant increase in student motivation and engagement. The integration of visual tools and multimedia narratives fostered reflection on educational practices and the development of transversal skills, particularly digital and communication skills. Students also demonstrated a greater ability to design inclusive activities and improved critical and reflective use of technology. As shown in Figure 2, these results translate into increased learning motivation, strengthened digital skills, and greater pedagogical awareness in the use of visual and narrative languages to support inclusive teaching. Although the study was conducted in a specific university context, the laboratory model described may represent an approach transferable to similar programs, particularly those focused on inclusive teaching and the pedagogical integration of digital technologies.

6. Conclusions

The survey revealed a significant increase in students’ motivation to learn, a strengthening of digital and communication skills, and greater pedagogical awareness in the use of visual and narrative languages to support school inclusion. However, some limitations should be acknowledged: the study relies mainly on self-reported data and a limited sample within a specific university training context. Additionally, the exploratory nature of the research and the absence of inferential statistical analyses limit the generalisability of the results. Future research could expand the sample and integrate methodological triangulation, for example through classroom observations or analysis of student-produced learning artefacts. The training model that emerges from the study highlights the validity of a teaching approach that integrates visual education, storytelling, and play as levers to promote active, experiential, reflective, and inclusive learning, consistent with the learning by doing paradigm [5,7], and highlights the potential of this model to support the development of inclusive, creative educational figures who are adaptable to the constant changes in professional contexts [1,8]. As illustrated in Figure 3, the training model is based on gamification and storytelling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A. and V.A.; methodology, I.A. and V.A.; software, I.A. and V.A.; validation, I.A. and V.A.; formal analysis, I.A. and V.A.; investigation, I.A. and V.A.; resources, I.A. and V.A.; data curation, I.A. and V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, I.A. and V.A.; writing—review and editing, I.A. and V.A.; visualization, I.A. and V.A.; supervision, I.A. and V.A.; I.A. and V.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as it involved a non-clinical educational research design and the analysis of anonymized data.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived for this study as it involved anonymized data and a non-clinical educational research design.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Perla, L.; Vinci, V. Didattica, Riconoscimento Professionale e Innovazione in Università; Francoangeli: Milano, Italy, 2022. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Sartori, R.; Gatti, M. Game-Based Learning: Il Ruolo del Gioco Nella Progettazione di Percorsi Formativi; Led: Milano, Italy, 2013. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Walkington, H.; Griffin, A.L.; Keys-Mathews, L.; Metoyer, S.K.; Miller, W.E.; Baker, R.; France, D. Embedding Research-Based Learning Early in the Undergraduate Geography Curriculum. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 2011, 35, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Occhini, L.; Bosco, N. Students as Visual Thinkers: Didattica e Apprendimento Image-Based in Higher Education. In Transformative Teaching in Higher Education; Fabbri, L., Romano, A., Eds.; Pensa Multimedia: Lecce, Italy, 2023; pp. 215–229. [Google Scholar]
  5. Perla, L. Didattica e Pratiche Dell’active Learning. In Apprendere a Insegnare; Crescenza, G., Volpicella, A., Eds.; Edizioni Conoscenza: Roma, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Perla, L. DocumentAZIONE = ProfessionalizzAZIONE? Scritture per la co-formazione in servizio degli insegnanti. In La Professionalità Degli Insegnanti. La Ricerca e le Pratiche; PensaMultimedia: Lecce, Italy, 2017; pp. 69–88. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Gabbi, E.; Gaggioli, C.; Ranieri, M. Active Learning and Academic Teaching: A Gamification Experience Between Game and Inclusion. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. Stud. 2023, 25, 160–176. [Google Scholar]
  8. Watt, S.; Wakefield, C. Teaching Visual Methods in the Social Sciences; Routledge: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture; Routledge: London, UK, 1938. [Google Scholar]
  10. Caillis, R. I Giochi e Gli Uomini; Bompiani: Milano, Italy, 1967. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Piaget, J. De la Logique de L’enfant à la Logique de L’adolescent; Puf: Paris, France, 1955. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  12. Wiggins, B.E. An Overview and Study on the Use of Games, Simulations, and Gamification in Higher Education. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 2016, 6, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Frison, D.; Menichetti, L. Metodi Ludici. Tendenze e Didattiche Innovative 0-11; Pensa Multimedia: Lecce, Italy, 2020. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Winnicott, D.W. Playing and Reality; Routledge: London, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Methodological map of the research.
Figure 1. Methodological map of the research.
Proceedings 139 00012 g001
Figure 2. Map of results and pedagogical implications.
Figure 2. Map of results and pedagogical implications.
Proceedings 139 00012 g002
Figure 3. Training model map.
Figure 3. Training model map.
Proceedings 139 00012 g003
Table 1. Pre-training intervention.
Table 1. Pre-training intervention.
QuestionsType of Responses No (Total 70)% (Total 100%)
Current level of
competence in using digital technologies
Beginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
15
50
5
0
21.5%
71.5%
7%
Initial perception of ICT trainingBeginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
60
10
0
0
85.5%
14.5%
0
Knowledge of Book CreatorBeginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
60
10
0
0
85.5%
14.5%
0
Knowledge of VocaroBeginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
5
50
15
0
7%
71.5%
21.4%
Knowledge of
Learning App
Beginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
5
50
15
0
7%
71.5%
21.5%
Knowledge of
PanQuiz
Beginner
Intermediate
Advanced
Expert
0
15
50
5
0
21.5%
71.5%
7%
Table 2. Post-training intervention.
Table 2. Post-training intervention.
QuestionsType of ResponsesN. (Tot. 70)% (Tot. 100%)
Post-Intervention Questionnaire
The objectives were clearYes, very clear
Quite clear
A little confusing
Not at all clear
0
60
10
0
85.5%
14.5%
0%
0%
The duration and the adequate loadYes, completely adequate
Quite adequate
A little too demanding
Definitely demanding
0
50
15
5
0
71.5%
21.5%
7%
Visual materials helped in understanding the topicsYes, very much
Quite a bit
A little
Not at all
0
60
10
0
0
85.5%
14.5%
0
The apps presented were interestingYes, very much
Quite a bit
A little
Not at all
0
60
9
1
0
85.5%
13%
1.5%
The apps presented were interestingYes, very much
Quite a bit
A little
Not at all
0
60
9
1
0
85.5%
13%
1.5%
Improving skills through trainingYes, significantly
Yes, a little
A little
Not at all
0
60
10
0
0
85.5%
14.5%
0
Use what you have learned in your teachingYes, definitely
Yes, partly
Not much
Not at all
0
50
20
0
0
71.5%
28.5%
0
Training satisfactionVery much
Quite a bit
A little
Not at all
0
60
10
0
0
855%
14.5%
0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amati, I.; Albano, V. Visual Education and Educational Innovation. An Exploratory Study in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Laboratories for the Training of Support Teachers in Nursery Schools. Proceedings 2026, 139, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139012

AMA Style

Amati I, Albano V. Visual Education and Educational Innovation. An Exploratory Study in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Laboratories for the Training of Support Teachers in Nursery Schools. Proceedings. 2026; 139(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amati, Ilenia, and Vincenza Albano. 2026. "Visual Education and Educational Innovation. An Exploratory Study in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Laboratories for the Training of Support Teachers in Nursery Schools" Proceedings 139, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139012

APA Style

Amati, I., & Albano, V. (2026). Visual Education and Educational Innovation. An Exploratory Study in Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Laboratories for the Training of Support Teachers in Nursery Schools. Proceedings, 139(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026139012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop