Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: From Innovation to Clinical Impact—A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Antifungal and Antioxidant Activities of Guava (Psidium guajava), Peppermint (Mentha piperita), and Patchouli (Pogostemon cablin) Essential Oils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Diagnostic Innovation vs. Sustainable Disposal: The Waste Dilemma in RT-qPCR Testing and Its Ecological and Financial Costs to Public Health †

by
Luan A. A. Santos
1,*,
Edejan H. Paula
2,
Farah C. Murtadha
1,
Fernanda Y. G. O. Andrade
2,
Fabiano J. Q. Costa
2,
Grasiela A. Silva
2 and
Tânia P. Costa
1
1
Multidisciplinary Residency Program in Health Surveillance, Fiocruz Brasília, PRMVS, Avenida L3 Norte, s/n, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Gleba A, Brasília 70.904-130, Brazil
2
Virology Center (Nvir) and Medical Biology Management (GBM), Central Public Health Laboratory of the Federal District, LACEN-DF, Brasília 70.830-010, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025, Hybrid, 21–23 November 2025.
Proceedings 2026, 137(1), 142; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137142
Published: 7 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 6th International Congress on Health Innovation—INOVATEC 2025)
Introduction: RT-qPCR represents a crucial diagnostic innovation in the epidemiological surveillance of respiratory viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and influenza. However, this technology generates a significant volume of residues, with socio-environmental and economic implications. This study analyzed the dilemma between diagnostic innovation and sustainable disposal, focusing on the physical, chemical, and biological waste generated by screening, amplification, and, mainly, by the genomic extraction step for RT-qPCR at the Central Public Health Laboratory of the Federal District (LACEN-DF). Methodology: The methodology included quantifying the mass of disposable supplies per 96-well assay and projecting for different periods, in addition to estimating incineration costs. Results: The results showed that each sample well processed (including screening, aliquoting, and extraction) generates approximately 32.75 g of waste. With an average of two extractions per day during periods without seasonal outbreaks, LACEN-DF generates approximately 6288.70 g of waste per day, totaling more than 2.2 tons annually. This waste, predominantly polypropylene, is single-use, infectious, and requires incineration, at an approximate annual cost of R$ 8000.00. The low recyclability of polypropylene (only 1%), its slow degradation, and the release of toxins during incineration highlight the ecological costs. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the diagnostic innovation by RT-qPCR poses a substantial challenge to sustainable disposal in the public health system, requiring more effective strategies to mitigate environmental and financial impacts.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.A.S.; methodology, E.H.P.; software, L.A.A.S.; validation, E.H.P., F.C.M. and L.A.A.S.; formal analysis, L.A.A.S.; investigation, F.C.M. and L.A.A.S.; data curation, T.P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.A.S.; writing—review and editing, E.H.P.; visualization, G.A.S.; supervision, E.H.P., F.Y.G.O.A. and F.J.Q.C. Costa; project administration, L.A.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, L.A.A.; Paula, E.H.; Murtadha, F.C.; Andrade, F.Y.G.O.; Costa, F.J.Q.; Silva, G.A.; Costa, T.P. Diagnostic Innovation vs. Sustainable Disposal: The Waste Dilemma in RT-qPCR Testing and Its Ecological and Financial Costs to Public Health. Proceedings 2026, 137, 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137142

AMA Style

Santos LAA, Paula EH, Murtadha FC, Andrade FYGO, Costa FJQ, Silva GA, Costa TP. Diagnostic Innovation vs. Sustainable Disposal: The Waste Dilemma in RT-qPCR Testing and Its Ecological and Financial Costs to Public Health. Proceedings. 2026; 137(1):142. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137142

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Luan A. A., Edejan H. Paula, Farah C. Murtadha, Fernanda Y. G. O. Andrade, Fabiano J. Q. Costa, Grasiela A. Silva, and Tânia P. Costa. 2026. "Diagnostic Innovation vs. Sustainable Disposal: The Waste Dilemma in RT-qPCR Testing and Its Ecological and Financial Costs to Public Health" Proceedings 137, no. 1: 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137142

APA Style

Santos, L. A. A., Paula, E. H., Murtadha, F. C., Andrade, F. Y. G. O., Costa, F. J. Q., Silva, G. A., & Costa, T. P. (2026). Diagnostic Innovation vs. Sustainable Disposal: The Waste Dilemma in RT-qPCR Testing and Its Ecological and Financial Costs to Public Health. Proceedings, 137(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026137142

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop