Next Article in Journal
Quality of Commercial and Manipulated Food Supplements Containing Ora-Pro-Nóbis Using an In Vitro Microbiological Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a New Molecular Approach for Detecting Genetic Variants Predisposing to Thiopurine Toxicity in Pediatric ALL
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Medical Polymers with the Help of Statistical Models: A Systematic Review †

1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78000, Turkey
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bursa Technical University, Bursa 16000, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science, 19–21 November 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCPS2025.
Proceedings 2026, 136(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136085
Published: 14 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science)
The mechanical strength, as well as the responsiveness to stimuli, of photosensitive polymers makes these materials exceptionally useful in the reconstruction of hard tissues, although their clinical effectiveness over extended periods of cyclic loading remains unclear. This work systematically reviews 86 research articles that estimate the fatigue life of medical-grade photosensitive polymers using three different techniques: adaptation of the Weibull distribution, Paris–Erdogan crack propagation models, and hybrid statistical–machine learning methods. Data collection comprised standardized bending and tensile fatigue tests performed under physiologically relevant loading conditions. Throughout 2010 to 2024, I found and screened 1247 records while adhering to PRISMA guidelines, eventually yielding 86 studies from sources like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Erdogan models reached accuracy rates of 83–86% (R2 range: 0.80–0.84), while the highest performing hybrid statistical–machine learning methods achieved 91–94% accuracy (R2 range: 0.88–0.91). These hybrid approaches outshone other models in capturing nonlinear degradation trends in high-cycle fatigue (>10−5 cycles) where traditional models overestimated fatigue life by 12–18%. Regardless of the model used, fatigue resistance was observed to strongly correlate crosslinking density (Pearson’s r = 0.79) and filler composition (r = 0.74). While statistical models have merit, especially during the preliminary stages of design, their predictive accuracy is often limited. In contrast, the machine learning component in hybrid models improved performance under varying load conditions and material complexity, resulting in more clinically reliable estimates of the device lifetime. Key limitations of the study included absent standardized protocols for fatigue testing and difficulties simulating in vivo degradation conditions. Supporting the conclusions of this study are the interdisciplinary efforts required to improve photosensitive polymer fatigue life testing that are guided by real-time clinical predictions and test standardization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A. and N.F.; methodology, E.A.; software, E.A.; validation, E.A. and N.F.; anformal analysis, E.A.; investigation, E.A.; resources, E.A.; data curation, E.A.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A.; writing—review and editing, E.A.; visualization, E.A.; supervision, N.F.; project administration, N.F.; funding acquisition, N.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abedini, E.; Feizlou, N. Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Medical Polymers with the Help of Statistical Models: A Systematic Review. Proceedings 2026, 136, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136085

AMA Style

Abedini E, Feizlou N. Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Medical Polymers with the Help of Statistical Models: A Systematic Review. Proceedings. 2026; 136(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abedini, Elnaz, and Nima Feizlou. 2026. "Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Medical Polymers with the Help of Statistical Models: A Systematic Review" Proceedings 136, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136085

APA Style

Abedini, E., & Feizlou, N. (2026). Prediction of the Fatigue Life of Medical Polymers with the Help of Statistical Models: A Systematic Review. Proceedings, 136(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136085

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop