Next Article in Journal
Valorization of Pecan Nutshell for the Design of Sustainable Polymeric Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Biomass-Derived Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Multiple Recycling Cycle Analysis of 3D-Printed Recycled Polycarbonate Using Fused Granulate Fabrication †

by
Phan Quoc Khang Nguyen
1,
Richard (Chunhui) Yang
1,*,
Y. X. Zhang
2,
Jojibabu Panta
1 and
Tosin Famakinwa
1
1
School of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Centre for Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NWS 2751, Australia
2
School of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, 81 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science, 19–21 November 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCPS2025.
Proceedings 2026, 136(1), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136075
Published: 14 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd International Online Conference on Polymer Science)
This study explores the degradation behaviours and mechanical performance of 3D-printed recycled polycarbonate (rPC) over multiple recycling cycles using fused granulate fabrication (FGF), a sustainable and scalable 3D printing technique. rPC flakes were subjected to ten recycling cycles, and their thermal, chemical, and mechanical properties were characterised using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and mechanical testing. The results reveal that their thermal stability gradually decreases with repeated processing; the glass transition temperature dropped from 110.2 °C to 96.4 °C after ten cycles, while the degradation onset temperature reduced slightly, indicating progressive thermal degradation. FTIR analysis showed transient structural improvements in early cycles, followed by a loss of key functional groups due to chain scission and oxidative degradation. Mechanical testing demonstrated a temporary enhancement in tensile strength and flexural strength—peaking at 68.59 MPa and 76.4 MPa, respectively—linked to improved chain alignment. However, these gains were reversed after the fifth cycle, with significant declines in strength, modulus, and impact strength. Fractography confirmed a transition from ductile to brittle failure beyond five cycles. FGF printing also reduced manufacturing time by up to 84% compared to fused filament fabrication, emphasising its viability for circular manufacturing. The findings offer critical insights into the recyclability feasibility of engineering polymers and support the broader application of FGF in polymer sustainability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Q.K.N., R.Y. and J.P.; methodology, P.Q.K.N. and J.P.; software, R.Y.; validation, R.Y. and T.F.; formal analysis, P.Q.K.N. and J.P.; investigation, P.Q.K.N. and J.P.; resources, R.Y., Y.X.Z. and T.F.; data curation, J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Q.K.N. and J.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.Z., R.Y. and T.F.; visualization, P.Q.K.N. and J.P.; supervision, R.Y., T.F. and Y.X.Z.; project administration, R.Y. and T.F.; funding acquisition, R.Y., Y.X.Z. and T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to show their gratitude for funding support from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia and the National Science Foundation, United States of America (USA), through the NSF Convergence Accelerator Program. P.N. would like to show his gratitude for funding support via the Postgraduate Scholarship Award from the Graduate Research School, Western Sydney University, during his PhD study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, P.Q.K.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Y.X.; Panta, J.; Famakinwa, T. Multiple Recycling Cycle Analysis of 3D-Printed Recycled Polycarbonate Using Fused Granulate Fabrication. Proceedings 2026, 136, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136075

AMA Style

Nguyen PQK, Yang R, Zhang YX, Panta J, Famakinwa T. Multiple Recycling Cycle Analysis of 3D-Printed Recycled Polycarbonate Using Fused Granulate Fabrication. Proceedings. 2026; 136(1):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Phan Quoc Khang, Richard (Chunhui) Yang, Y. X. Zhang, Jojibabu Panta, and Tosin Famakinwa. 2026. "Multiple Recycling Cycle Analysis of 3D-Printed Recycled Polycarbonate Using Fused Granulate Fabrication" Proceedings 136, no. 1: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136075

APA Style

Nguyen, P. Q. K., Yang, R., Zhang, Y. X., Panta, J., & Famakinwa, T. (2026). Multiple Recycling Cycle Analysis of 3D-Printed Recycled Polycarbonate Using Fused Granulate Fabrication. Proceedings, 136(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2026136075

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop