Next Article in Journal
Language Policies as an Integral Part of Public Administration in Greece: A Potential Framework Enabling Language Reinforcement and Language Tourism
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress on Conjecture O and Its Variants: A Survey
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review

by
G. Esaïe Kpadonou
1,*,
Kyky Komla Ganyo
1,
Ayoni Ogunbayo
1,
Emmanuel Njukwe
1,
Niéyidouba Lamien
1 and
Aissatou Drame Yaye
2
1
West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development (CORAF), Dakar BP 48, Senegal
2
Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni, Niamey BP 10896, Niger
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Proceedings 2025, 118(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025118019
Published: 30 July 2025
In submitting conference proceedings to Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: The single-blind style was used at the first level of the review process. Full papers were evaluated by the scientific committee of CORAF. Successful papers were then sent to independent reviewers using the double-anonymized peer review style.
  • Conference submission management system: Institutional email.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 265 abstracts were received, out of which 31 papers were accepted as full research papers for the first stage.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 18 papers were accepted for publication after the peer-review process.
  • Number of submission published: 17 papers were finally published online.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 54%.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 39 reviewers.
  • Review process and criteria:
    Clarity of the research problem and objectives as presented in the manuscript.
    Clarity and rigor of the methodology adopted with respect to the type of research.
    Shows evidence in advancing knowledge related to the topics.
    Quality of writing.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the independent reviewers for their time and invaluable support in reviewing the symposium papers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kpadonou, G.E.; Ganyo, K.K.; Ogunbayo, A.; Njukwe, E.; Lamien, N.; Yaye, A.D. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings 2025, 118, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025118019

AMA Style

Kpadonou GE, Ganyo KK, Ogunbayo A, Njukwe E, Lamien N, Yaye AD. Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings. 2025; 118(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025118019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kpadonou, G. Esaïe, Kyky Komla Ganyo, Ayoni Ogunbayo, Emmanuel Njukwe, Niéyidouba Lamien, and Aissatou Drame Yaye. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Proceedings 118, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025118019

APA Style

Kpadonou, G. E., Ganyo, K. K., Ogunbayo, A., Njukwe, E., Lamien, N., & Yaye, A. D. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Proceedings, 118(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025118019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop