Next Article in Journal
Radical Scavenging and Ion-Reducing Capacity of Fumaria officinalis Extracts Obtained by Traditional and Assisted Extraction Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Postharvest Handling Practices of Sweet Orange Marketers in Benue State, Nigeria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Novel Functional Food Products †

by
Panagiota Alvanoudi
1,
Chrysanthi Charatsari
2,
Fotios Chatzitheodoridis
3,
Evgenia Karamouzi
4,
Dimitra Lazaridou
5,
Paraskevi Liakopoulou
4,
Evagelos Lioutas
6,
Efstratios Loizou
3,
Maria Loizou
2,
Fani Mantzouridou
1,
Anastasios Michailidis
2,*,
Anna Michailidou
2,
Evangelia Michailidou
2,
Stefanos Nastis
2,
Smaragda Nikouli
2,
Aikaterini Paltaki
2,
Panagiotis Panopoulos
4,
Dimitrios Tsolis
4 and
Antanina Valoshyna
2
1
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, School of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Department of Regional Development and Cross Border Studies, School of Economic Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, Koila Campus, 50100 Kozani, Greece
4
REZOS Brands, Patras Industrial Area, 25200 Patras, Greece
5
Department of Forestry and Natural Environment Management, Agricultural University of Athens, 36100 Karpenisi, Greece
6
Department of Supply Chain Management, International Hellenic University, 60100 Katerini, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food & Environment, Samos, Greece, 17–20 October 2024.
Proceedings 2025, 117(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117027
Published: 13 May 2025

Abstract

:
Functional foods are products that have clinically evidenced health benefits for consumers due to one or more of their ingredients. While research indicates that consumers are highly interested in these products and are often willing to pay premium prices to buy them, stories of market failure are frequent for the specific category. Hence, a critical question is what determines consumers’ willingness to purchase functional food products. A hypothesis confirmed by many studies is that health concerns are positively associated with purchasing intentions. Nevertheless, other factors may also positively or negatively affect consumers’ willingness to buy functional foods. Our work examines this contention by focusing on a novel functional food product: yogurt enriched with sea buckthorn. The product, which is developing in the framework of an ongoing project, is expected to combine the health benefits of yogurt with the medicinal properties of sea buckthorn.

1. Introduction

Our daily diet influences our nutrition, just as it does our overall health and wellness. In this respect, there is a wide range of food products designed to offer benefits beyond just simply energy, minerals, or vitamins, the so-called functional foods [1]. Functional foods, by their definition, are foods offering health benefits beyond their intrinsic nutrient value. Because of their nutritional and nutraceutical values, functional foods can prevent various chronic conditions and contribute to health [2]. Functional foods can be defined as dietary supplements that in addition to their nutritional values, can positively influence body functions towards enhancing physiological responses or reduce the risk of certain diseases [3]. Active components of functional foods can have beneficial effects on metabolic disorders, such as hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity/overweight, hypercholesterolemia, and inflammation [4]. As public awareness of health benefits grows, the functional foods industry is emerging rapidly [5,6].
Sea buckthorn or Hippophae is a deciduous shrub of the family sea buckthorn. Textual research indicates that it has existed on Earth for approximately 200 million years. The ancient Greeks discovered it around 5000 BC and since then it has been employed as a medicinal remedy or a sacred food for both healing and nourishment [7]. At present, more than 20 countries all over the world are promoting and utilizing sea buckthorn. Sea buckthorn ranks first among the top ten raw materials of health products, as announced by the World Health Organization [8].
Sea buckthorn is endemic to Asia and Europe, mainly distributed in the temperate and cold temperate zones of Eurasia. Approximately 150 species, subspecies, and varieties of sea buckthorn have been identified within Eurasia; they differed in the habitat of the shrub, the appearance of berries, and their use value [9]. Among them, Hippophae rhamnoides is the most important and widespread in Europe [10]. This plant has attracted the interest of researchers for centuries due to its many properties and numerous economic benefits. It has been utilized in daily life for various purposes, including as a raw material for food products, cosmetics, and nutraceuticals, as well as for environmental protection. Additionally, this plant has a rich history in natural medicine that continues to this day [11].
The two most common products derived from the fruit are juice from the fleshy tissue of berries, and oil produced from the seeds of berries [11]. The plant contains a diverse range of nutrients and bioactive components, including minerals, vitamins, polysaccharides, unsaturated fatty acids, terpenoids, polyphenolic compounds, nonsteroidal compounds, flavonoids, organic acids, and volatile components [12]. Due to this remarkable chemical composition, sea buckthorn exhibits a diverse array of beneficial biological, physiological, and medicinal effects, which were extensively described, such as antioxidative and immunomodulating, cardioprotective and antiatherogenic, antibacterial and antiviral effects, healing effects on acute and chronic wounds, antiradiation, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, anticarcinogenic, hepatoprotective, and dermatological effects, etc [9,13,14,15,16,17,18].
The fruit of Sea buckthorn has been used for treating cardiovascular and respiratory diseases for a long history [5]. Numerous studies have connected the role of dietary lipids to the prevention and treatment of various diseases. These functional lipids, including omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, conjugated linoleic acids, medium chain triglycerides, and phytosterols, offer numerous benefits for human health, particularly regarding chronic conditions such as in obesity, bone health, and in treating and managing depression, blood pressure, cardiovascular health, etc. [19]. The berries are nutritious, despite their high acidity. They are rich in proteins and essential amino acids, and they also contain mineral elements such as calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), iron (Fe), and especially potassium (K), which is the most abundant among them. Additionally, fruits include high levels of vitamins, like C (695 mg/100 g, which is comparatively more than lemons and oranges) [20].
Food industry develops many products from the berries, leaves, and bark extracts of sea buckthorn [21,22]. The different parts of the plant can be processed into oil, juice, dried food, alcoholic beverages, candies, ice cream, tea, jam, biscuits, vitamin C tablets, food colors, medicines, cosmetics, and shampoos [23]. This plant holds a significant economic value, as not only the berries, but also the roots, leaves, and seed can be utilized to produce a variety of products. Over the past decades, there has been an enormous increase in the production of products based on Hippophae sp., and its cultivation is expected to grow even more in the near future in certain countries (e.g., Greece) [24].
In this research, a novel functional food product, yogurt enriched with sea buckthorn is produced. This product, which is developing in the framework of an ongoing project, is expected to combine the health benefits of yogurt with the medicinal properties of sea buckthorn. Hence, a critical question is what determines consumers’ willingness to purchase functional food products. The aim of the work is to assess consumer behavior, attitudes, and opinions towards the development of these new products involving the use of sea buckthorn.

2. Methods

This study is being conducted, from May to August 2024, within the framework of the SYMP.E.G.A. research project, which aims to develop novel agricultural products, specifically functional yoghurt enhanced with sea buckthorn fruits. Precision Agriculture will be used to improve the cultivation process of this innovative, nutritious, and value-added product. Its steps include: (a) researching and developing a novel Precision Agriculture business model for targeted cultivations, (b) applying Precision Agriculture technologies to sea buckthorn crops, (c) evaluating the effectiveness of five crop varieties, (d) harvesting sea buckthorn berries, producing high-nutrient yoghurt enhanced with sea buckthorn (both on a pilot and laboratory scale), and (e) taking steps to mediate and support innovation.
The same questionnaire (same dates, same sample) was used in the joint survey for the two sister projects (SAKAMI and SYMP.E.G.A.) [25]. Additionally, there were particular questions for the two projects’ products (high nutritional value yoghurt enriched with sea buckthorn and cereal bars enriched with sea buckthorn, respectively). Specifically for the SYMP.E.G.A project the second part of the questionnaire was designed to investigate the influence of five categories of factors on consumers’ willingness to buy the novel product: (a) Perceived health benefits of functional foods; (b) Expected sensory attributes of the product; (c) Sustainability performance of the product, involving an environmental and a social dimension; (d) Social acceptability of similar products; (e) Ease of finding the product.

3. Results

The results of the investigation showed that the examined parameters had an impact on consumers’ willingness to buy yoghurt that has been enriched with sea buckthorn. Knowledge of the (bio)functional action (72.4%), health reasons (68.9%), support of small-scale farmers (69.6%), taste (14.9%), and price (23.7%) are the most important characteristics that can be proposed as predictors of consumer behavior.
Comparing the products of the 2 projects, we observe that younger consumers prefer to consume cereal bars enriched with sea buckthorn while older consumers prefer to consume high nutritional value yoghurt enriched with sea buckthorn. However, there is a special category of young consumers, mainly women, who are careful about their diet and are aware of healthy eating issues and who would be willing to pay even 50% more than conventional yogurt. This consumer group constitutes 12.5% of the sample and is the main target group of the SYMP.E.G.A. project.

4. Conclusions

This research has provided valuable insights into consumer behaviour toward a yoghurt product enriched with sea buckthorn, highlighting key factors that influence purchasing decisions, awareness levels, and consumption patterns. The findings indicate that while sea buckthorn is recognized for its health benefits—such as its high antioxidant content, immune support, and nutritional value—consumer awareness and familiarity with the product remain relatively limited in many markets.
Knowledge of the (bio)functional action, health reasons, support of small-scale farmers, taste, and price emerged as significant drivers in consumer decision-making. Moreover, demographic variables such as sex and age, education, and health-consciousness significantly affect interest and purchasing behaviour. Marketing strategies emphasizing education, transparency about health benefits, and appealing product forms (e.g., juices, supplements, skincare) can enhance consumer engagement and trust.
In conclusion, increasing consumer education and targeted marketing efforts are essential for expanding the market for sea buckthorn products. Future research could further explore regional differences, long-term consumption trends, and the impact of sustainable sourcing on consumer perception.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N. (Stefanos Nastis) and A.M. (Anastasios Michailidis); methodology, E.L. (Efstratios Loizou) and P.P.; software, E.M. and P.L.; validation, S.N. (Stefanos Nastis), A.M. (Anastasios Michailidis) and D.L.; formal analysis, C.C. and M.L.; investigation, E.K. and P.A.; resources, D.T. and A.V.; data curation, A.M. (Anna Michailidou) and S.N. (Smaragda Nikouli); writing—original draft preparation, F.M. and A.P.; writing—review and editing, E.L. (Evagelos Lioutas); visualization, A.M. (Anna Michailidou); supervision, S.N. (Stefanos Nastis); project administration, A.M. (Anastasios Michailidis); funding acquisition, F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was co-funded by (a) the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), (b) the Agricultural Development Program (RAP) 2014–2022, (c) the Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework (PA) 2014–2020, and (d) the Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food. Project Number: Μ16ΣΥΝ2-00163.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is part of an ongoing project titled “Pilot cultivation of five (5) varieties of sea buckthorn, using Precision Agriculture techniques, in purpose the development of high nutrition value yogurt, as healthy diet standard”.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Evgenia Karamouzi, Panagiotis Panopoulos, Dimitrios Tsolis and Paraskevi Liakopoulou were employed by the company REZOS Brands. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farag, M.A.; Abdelwareth, A.; Sallam, I.E.; el Shorbagi, M.; Jehmlich, N.; Fritz-Wallace, K.; Schäpe, S.S.; Rolle-Kampczyk, U.; Ehrlich, A.; Wessjohann, L.A.; et al. Metabolomics reveals impact of seven functional foods on metabolic pathways in a gut microbiota model. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 23, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zannou, O.; Oussou, K.F.; Chabi, I.B.; Alamou, F.; Awad, N.M.H.; Miassi, Y.E.; Loké, F.C.V.; Abdoulaye, A.; Pashazadeh, H.; Redha, A.A.; et al. Phytochemical and nutritional properties of sumac (Rhus coriaria): A potential ingredient for developing functional foods. J. Future Foods 2025, 5, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nicoletti, M. Nutraceuticals and botanicals: Overview; perspectives. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khalil, M.; Hayek, S.; Khalil, N.; Serale, N.; Vergani, L.; Calasso, M.; De Angelis, M.; Portincasa, P. Role of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) in the management of metabolic syndrome and related disorders: Focus NAFLD-Atheroscler. Interplay. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, B.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Luo, L.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, C. Targeted metabolite and molecular profiling of carotenoids in rose petals: A step forward towards functional food applications. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takahashi, J.A.; Rezende, F.A.G.G.; Moura, M.A.F.; Dominguete, L.C.B.; Sande, D. Edible flowers: Bioactive profile and its potential to be used in food development. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pundir, S.; Garg, P.; Dviwedi, A.; Ali, A.; Kapoor, V.K.; Kapoor, D.; Kulshrestha, S.; Lal, U.R.; Negi, P. Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry and dermatological effects of Hippophae rhamnoides L.: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 266, 113434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, A.; Feng, X.; Dorjsuren, B.; Chimedtseren, C.; Damda, T.A.; Zhang, C. Traditional food, modern food and nutritional value of Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.): A review. J. Future Foods 2023, 3, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ciesarová, Z.; Murkovic, M.; Cejpek, K.; Kreps, F.; Tobolková, B.; Koplík, R.; Belajová, E.; Kukurová, K.; Daško, Ľ.; Panovská, Z.; et al. Why is sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) so exceptional? A Review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, B.; Kallio, H.P. Fatty acid composition of lipids in sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) berries of different origins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1939–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gâtlan, A.M.; Gutt, G. Sea Buckthorn in Plant Based Diets. An Analytical Approach of Sea Buckthorn Fruits Composition: Nutritional Value, Applications, and Health Benefits. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ji, M.; Gong, X.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Li, M. Advanced Research on the Antioxidant Activity and Mechanism of Polyphenols from Hippophae Species—A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guo, R.; Guo, X.; Li, T.; Fu, X.; Liu, R.H. Comparative assessment of phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of Sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) berries. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamułka, J.; Górnicka, M.; Sulich, A.; Frąckiewicz, J. Weight loss program is associated with decrease α-tocopherol status in obese adults. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 1861–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hao, W.; He, Z.; Zhu, H.; Liu, J.; Kwek, E.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, K.Y.; He, W.S.; Chen, Z.Y. Sea buckthorn seed oil reduces blood cholesterol and modulates gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 5669–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Olas, B. Sea buckthorn as a source of important bioactive compounds in cardiovascular diseases. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 97, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olas, B.; Skalski, B.; Ulanowska, K. The anticancer activity of sea buckthorn [Elaeagnus rhamnoides (L.) A. Nelson]. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 355084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ranard, K.M.; Erdman, J.W. Effects of dietary RRR α-tocopherol vs all-racemic α-tocopherol on health outcomes. Nutr. Rev. 2018, 76, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zakynthinos, G.; Varzakas, T.; Petsios, D. Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) lipids and their functionality on health aspects. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 4, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Christaki, E. Hippophae rhamnoides L. (Sea Buckthorn): A Potential Source Nutraceuticals. Food Public Health 2012, 3, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, X.; Moilanen, J.; Laaksonen, O.; Yang, W.; Tenhu, E.; Yang, B. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of tea-type infusions processed from sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides) leaves. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tzachristas, A.; Pasvanka, K.; Liouni, M.; Calokerinos, A.C.; Tataridis, P.; Proestos, C. Effect of Hippophae rhamnoides L. Leaves Treatment on the Antioxidant Capacity, Total Phenol Content and Sensory Profile of Moschofilero Wines Vinified with and without Added Sulphites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kyriakopoulou, K.; Pappa, A.; Krokida, M.; Detsi, A.; Kefalas, P. Effects of Drying and Extraction Methods on the Quality and Antioxidant Activity of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) Berries and Leaves. Dry. Technol. 2013, 31, 1063–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Papavasileiou, P.; Zervou, M.E.; Tsigkou, K.; Koutra, E.; Birbas, E.; Kornaros, M. Dilute acid pretreatment of Hippophae rhamnoeides prunings towards their biotechnological exploitation through anaerobic digestion. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2022, 12, 4585–4597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nastis, S.A.; Michailidis, A.; Charatsari, C.; Karamouzi, E.; Lazaridou, D.; Lioutas, E.D.; Loizou, E.; Chatzitheodoridis, F.; Loizou, M.; Michailidou, A.; et al. Consumers’ Attitudes Towards Novel Products: The Case of Cereal Bars with Sea Buckthorn. Proceedings 2025, 117, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alvanoudi, P.; Charatsari, C.; Chatzitheodoridis, F.; Karamouzi, E.; Lazaridou, D.; Liakopoulou, P.; Lioutas, E.; Loizou, E.; Loizou, M.; Mantzouridou, F.; et al. Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Novel Functional Food Products. Proceedings 2025, 117, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117027

AMA Style

Alvanoudi P, Charatsari C, Chatzitheodoridis F, Karamouzi E, Lazaridou D, Liakopoulou P, Lioutas E, Loizou E, Loizou M, Mantzouridou F, et al. Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Novel Functional Food Products. Proceedings. 2025; 117(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alvanoudi, Panagiota, Chrysanthi Charatsari, Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, Evgenia Karamouzi, Dimitra Lazaridou, Paraskevi Liakopoulou, Evagelos Lioutas, Efstratios Loizou, Maria Loizou, Fani Mantzouridou, and et al. 2025. "Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Novel Functional Food Products" Proceedings 117, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117027

APA Style

Alvanoudi, P., Charatsari, C., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Karamouzi, E., Lazaridou, D., Liakopoulou, P., Lioutas, E., Loizou, E., Loizou, M., Mantzouridou, F., Michailidis, A., Michailidou, A., Michailidou, E., Nastis, S., Nikouli, S., Paltaki, A., Panopoulos, P., Tsolis, D., & Valoshyna, A. (2025). Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Novel Functional Food Products. Proceedings, 117(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop