Next Article in Journal
Unveiling the Secrets of Embeddings: Does the Importance of Agricultural Terms Relate to the Context They Occur In?
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Laboratory Testing of a Bucket Milking Machine with Flow-Controlled Vacuum, Based on an NI Data Acquisition System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Honey Cost: An Experimental Approach for Determining the Production Costs of Honey †

by
Concetta Cardillo
1,*,
Antonio Giampaolo
2 and
Milena Verrascina
1
1
Centre for Policies and Bioeconomy, CREA—Council for Research in Agriculture and Economics, Via Barberini, 36, 00187 Rome, Italy
2
Centre for Policies and Bioeconomy, CREA—Council for Research in Agriculture and Economics, Via Lombardia, c.da Bucceri, c/o MOF, Centro Agroalimentare Val Pescara, 65012 Cepagatti, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food & Environment, Samos, Greece, 17–20 October 2024.
Proceedings 2025, 117(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117002
Published: 17 April 2025

Abstract

:
The Honey Cost project, conceived and developed by the CREA Policies and Bioeconomics research center (CREA PB), will develop a methodology and tools for ad hoc data collection and evaluation of the bee and honey sector and sets up a sample survey on it. The determination of the cost of honey production is carried out through a questionnaire, submitted to a sample of 434 farms with an economic size of at least EUR 8,000 of Standard Output. In the methodology adopted, three cost levels are envisaged, with the first level referring only to current expenses, the second level adding other general expenses, and, finally, the third level also adding the cost of family labor. The first survey, carried out in 2023, covered the two-year period of 2021–2022. It emerged that among the variable costs, those incurred for packaging and marketing represent, in percentage, the most important item, followed by nutrition costs, and their incidence varies depending on the farm type and on the economic size. Even among the components of general costs (depreciation and other non-direct expenses), a strong variability was found, and this attenuates when moving from small to large farms. The total production cost stands, as a sample average, at around EUR 9 per kilogram of honey produced. For many farms, this value is well above the price that is recognized by the market for their product.

1. Introduction

For some years the Council for Research in Agriculture and Agricultural Economics Analysis–Centre for Policies and Bioeconomy (CREA-PB) has been studying the environmental, social, and economic dynamics of the bee and honey sector [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. In the analysis of the supply chain, the lack of accurate and reliable information on the determining factors of the production processes emerges, which is due to estimates or approximations, which are not always systematic and supportive of robust analysis. In particular, a difficulty emerges in estimating production costs, which are essential for understanding the economic sustainability of a beekeeping company. The Honey Cost project, conceived and developed by the CREA-PB research center, develops a methodology and tools for ad hoc data collection and evaluation of the bee and honey sector and sets up a sample survey on the sector. The Honey Cost statistical survey on honey production costs aims to deepen our knowledge on economic [10,11,12] and production dynamics and challenges and opportunities related to beekeeping and to determine elements that can help ensure the economic sustainability of a beekeeping company. The survey also aims to respond to the research needs of the institutional, scientific, and economic system, defining in an original and rigorous way a reference information base for a sector that is becoming increasingly important from an economic and environmental point of view [13,14,15,16].
This is useful work for the system as a whole, for farms to better define their strategies, for political decision makers to better design support tools, and for researchers to have the correct information to determine the consistency of and trends in the sector and to build analyses of its evolution and future scenarios.

2. Materials and Methods

The determination of the cost of honey production was carried out through a questionnaire, submitted to a sample of farms that were appropriately chosen from all those listed in the National Beekeeping Database. The theoretical sample consisted of 434 farms, representing the group of approximately 6100 beekeepers that have an economic size of at least EUR 8000 of Standard Output, and the representativeness of the sample was based on region and the economic size class [17,18,19,20].
The data collection takes place through a specific web application (https://honeycost.crea.gov.it/ accessed on 1 April 2025), data entry is facilitated by an online support system, and the technical assistance is provided by CREA. Furthermore, data collection and the processing and dissemination of results take place in full compliance with the rules on the protection of personal data (GDPR) and statistical confidentiality.
The questionnaire is made up of 8 sections: general information on the farm; structural data; forms of marketing; composition of the workforce; size of the farm; production, expenses, and costs of the farm; use of labor; and travel.
In the methodology adopted, 3 cost levels are envisaged: a first level referring only to current expenses; a second level, in which other general expenses are added; and, finally, a third level, to which the cost of family labor is added.
The cost of unpaid labor is determined on the basis of the hours that are worked by the individual members of the family or relatives of the farm manager, the level of professionalism, and the gross hourly rate envisaged for each level (equivalent to general worker or specialized worker) in the national contracts of the agricultural sector.

3. Results

The first Honey Cost survey was carried out in 2023, and data relating to the two-year period of 2021–2022 were collected. The number of respondent farms was 223, about 50% of the sample, but the low coverage in many regions did not allow for an analysis including territorial details. However, the high number of questionnaires that were collected and completed at a national level allowed us to produce a series of analyses of the results by farm type and farming method. In particular, farms were divided into three economic classes (Table 1) and two farm types: nomadic (farms who move their hives throughout the year in search of more productive locations) and permanent (farms who always keep their hives on the farm).
From the first analysis, it emerges that the honey yields per hive do not differ greatly depending on the economic size but, above all, depending on the farming method. In fact, for farms that practice nomadism, the average yield is around 22 kg of honey per hive and varies between 11 and 52 kg, while for permanent farms, the average honey yield is significantly lower, standing at around 12 kg.
The price of honey does not vary significantly depending on the farming methods: for the two years considered, the average price collected suggests a range of EUR 8.9 to EUR 9.7. Large farms have an average price of around 7.6 EUR/kg, with a variability ranging from 6 to 9 EUR/kg and with peaks of up to 13 EUR/kg in the retail trade.
The production costs of honey are strongly influenced by factors that are external to the management of the farm (climate, parasites, pesticides, air pollution, etc.), and therefore, it is difficult to identify an overall average unit cost which can cover all beekeepers.
Among the variable costs (Table 2) (just over 4 EUR/kg), excluding those for transportation, the costs incurred for packaging and marketing represent, in terms of percentage, the most important item (between 25% and 45%), followed by rescue nutrition costs (between 15% and 40%). The importance of these categories of variable costs varies depending on the type of farming and above all on the economic dimension. Large farms have less variability and lower costs than those with less than 120 hives, which is due to the so-called economies of scale. On average, for 8% of farms, the selling price does not cover their variable costs, and the situation varies depending on the type and size.
Even among the components of general costs (Table 3) (depreciation and other non-direct expenses), a strong variability was found, which attenuates when moving from small to large farms (with more than 240 hives). The depreciation item even reaches, in some types of farms, 50% of the fixed costs that are incurred by the farm, especially in medium–small ones. In this case, on average, for 31% of farms, the sales price does not cover the second-level costs. The situation varies depending on the type and size.
The cost of honey production, which also takes into account family work, is on average EUR 13 per kg of honey that is produced (Table 4). This cost varies depending on the typological class.
Even when considering the market conditions and adverse climatic events that occurred in the period to which the collected data refer (2021 and 2022), good economic performance can still be seen. The level of unit productivity of the hives, expressed in terms of the honey yield, compared to the price paid to beekeepers for their product is positioned above the minimum threshold of unit yields that allow for the production costs to be covered.
During 2024, the collection of data relating to the 2023 and 2024 production years will be completed. Honey Cost, in fact, aims to represent a fundamental point of analysis of the sector, ensuring the scientific methodology and punctuality of the collection and offering, even in the years to come, a medium-term reference for the national and international market, examining the determining factors in the formation of costs and identifying a series of variables and risks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C., A.G. and M.V.; methodology, C.C., A.G. and M.V.; software, A.G.; validation, C.C., A.G. and M.V.; data curation, C.C. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and M.V.; writing—review and editing, C.C.; project administration, C.C. and M.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is unavailable due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CREACouncil for Research in Agriculture and Economics
PBCentre for Policies and Bioeconomics
GDPRGeneral Data Protection Regulation

References

  1. Cavlin, M.; Prdic, N.; Ignijatijevic, S.; Tankosic, J.; Lekic, N.; Kostic, S. Research on the Determination of the Factors Affecting Business Performance in Beekeeping Production. Agriculture 2023, 13, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAO. Why Bees Matter: The Importance of Bees and Other Pollinators for Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fissore, A. Economia Dell’azienda Apistica. 2002. Quaderno n. 3. Available online: https://www.calameo.com/books/002493353926e81a8f6fa (accessed on 12 March 2024).
  4. Foote, N. Struggling Beekeepers Undercut by Cheap Honey Imports, Says New Report. 2020. Available online: https://www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/news/struggling-beekeepers-undercut-by-cheap-honey-imports-says-new-report/ (accessed on 10 March 2024).
  5. Hoover, S.E.; Ovinge, L.P. Pollen collection, honey production, and pollination services: Managing honey bees in an agricultural setting. J. Econ. Èntomol. 2018, 111, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Majewski, J. Beekeeping Support in the European Union Countries, Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 2017, Volume 17, pp. 193–197. Available online: http://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.17_4/volume_17_4_2017.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2024).
  7. Rossi, R. The EU’s Beekeeping Sector (PE). 2017. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2017/608786/EPRS_ATA%282017%29608786_EN.pdf (accessed on 13 February 2024).
  8. Winfree, R.; Gross, B.J.; Kremen, C. Valuing pollination services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 71, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pocol, C.B.; Ignjatijević, S.; Cavicchioli, D. Production and Trade of Honey in Selected European Countries: Serbia, Romania and Italy; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Blanc, S.; Brun, F.; Mosso, A. Valutazioni Economiche Dell’attività Apicola in Area Montana. 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318876997_Valutazioni_economiche_dell%27attivita_apicola_in_area_montana (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  11. Saner, G.; Engindeniz, S.; Tolon, B.; Cukur, F. The Economic Analysis of Beekeeping Enterprise in Sustainable Development: The Case Study of Turkey. 2004. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237673962_THE_ECONOMIC_ANALYSIS_OF_BEEKEEPING_ENTERPRISE_IN_SUSTAINABLE_DEVELOPMENT_A_CASE_STUDY_OF_TURKEY (accessed on 2 March 2024).
  12. Vercelli, M.; Croce, L.; Mancuso, T. An Economic Approach to Assess the Annual Stock in Beekeeping Farms: The Honey Bee Colony Inventory Tool. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beltrán, J.I.Z.; Santiago, M.A.L.; Alcalá, R.V.; Batalla, B.M. Analysis of beekeeping profitability by strata in Aguascalientes, Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias 2020, 12, 453–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Al-Ghamdi, A.; Adgaba, N.; Herab, A.H.; Ansari, M.J. Comparative analysis of profitability of honey production using traditional and box hives. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yildirim, I.; Agar, S. The Influence of Scale on the Profitability of Honey Beekeeping Enterprises in Eastern Part of Turkey. Asian J. Anim. Veter-Adv. 2008, 3, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pacheco, M.A.G.; Ocaña, A.B. Sustainability and Innovation in the Beekeeping Sector: A First Approach. In Digital and Sustainable Transformations in a Post-COVID World; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brini, A.; Giovannini, E.; Smaniotto, E. A machine learning approach to forecasting honey production with tree-based methods. arXiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheryl, D.; White, B. A survey dataset to better understand the honey bee industry, use and value of natural resources and challenges for beekeepers in Western Australia: A beekeepers’ perspective. Data Brief 2022, 45, 108639. [Google Scholar]
  19. Djurabaev, O.D. Features of Management and Clustering of Beekeeping Farms. IJSSIR 2022, 11. Available online: https://gejournal.net/index.php/IJSSIR/article/view/549/512 (accessed on 1 March 2024).
  20. Kostyukova, E.I.; Manzhosova, I.B.; Frolov, A.V. Features of cost accounting and calculation of the cost of production of honey-pollinating direction of beekeeping. Buhuchet V Sel Skom Hozjajstve (Account. Agric.) 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Composition of economic classes of beekeeping farms.
Table 1. Composition of economic classes of beekeeping farms.
Economic SizeStandard OutputNumber of BeehivesAverage Number of Beehives in the Sample
SMALL≤EUR 25,000Less than 12065
MEDIUMEUR 25,000–50,000120–240162
LARGE>EUR 50,000More than 240490
Table 2. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–first level.
Table 2. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–first level.
Variable CostsNomadicPermanent
(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large
Travel1.851.430.810.000.000.00
Drugs0.130.160.110.270.110.26
Nutrition0.660.580.570.620.650.94
Insurance and Certification0.070.090.030.150.120.02
Packaging and Marketing1.090.990.571.540.760.67
Other Expenses0.320.190.210.350.390.18
Variable Expenses
(production costs, 1st level)
4.443.732.483.392.452.26
Maximum (third quartile)8.506.254.225.153.813.91
Minimum (first quartile)2.532.461.652.141.451.34
Table 3. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–second level.
Table 3. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–second level.
Variable CostsNomadicPermanent
(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large
Workforce and social changes1.670.841.021.030.751.01
Rents and general expenses1.100.570.461.220.810.40
Depreciation1.951.000.832.481.271.10
Ordinary maintenance0.120.120.180.220.160.20
Total fixed costs4.842.532.494.952.992.72
Total variable costs (1st level)4.443.732.483.392.452.26
Total costs of production (2nd level)9.296.264.978.355.434.98
Table 4. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–third level.
Table 4. Production costs of honey (EUR/kg)–third level.
Variable CostsNomadismPermanent
(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large(1) Small(2) Medium(3) Large
Total costs of production, 2nd level9.296.264.978.355.434.98
Family labor costs9.896.153.939.098.487.36
Total costs of production (3rd level)19.1812.418.9017.4413.9112.34
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardillo, C.; Giampaolo, A.; Verrascina, M. Honey Cost: An Experimental Approach for Determining the Production Costs of Honey. Proceedings 2025, 117, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117002

AMA Style

Cardillo C, Giampaolo A, Verrascina M. Honey Cost: An Experimental Approach for Determining the Production Costs of Honey. Proceedings. 2025; 117(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardillo, Concetta, Antonio Giampaolo, and Milena Verrascina. 2025. "Honey Cost: An Experimental Approach for Determining the Production Costs of Honey" Proceedings 117, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117002

APA Style

Cardillo, C., Giampaolo, A., & Verrascina, M. (2025). Honey Cost: An Experimental Approach for Determining the Production Costs of Honey. Proceedings, 117(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2025117002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop