Next Article in Journal
Advancing Coffee Genetic Resource Conservation and Exchange: Global Perspectives and Strategies from the ICC 2024 Satellite Workshop
Previous Article in Journal
Mass Transfer of Dichloromethane from EU Retail Roast and Ground Decaffeinated Coffee into Prepared Beverages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Caffeine Crystal Growth on Roasted Coffee Beans Misidentified as Biological Spoilage †

by
Francisco Velazquez Escobar
*,
Reem Alrushidan
and
Amer Ba Shuaib
Camel Step Co., Abi Bakr As Siddiq Branch Rd., Al Tawwun District, Riyadh 12475, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the International Coffee Convention 2024, Mannheim, Germany, 17–18 October 2024.
Proceedings 2024, 109(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/ICC2024-18171
Published: 8 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of ICC 2024)

Abstract

:
The spoilage of roasted coffee products is largely suppressed through industry standards regarding storage and packaging. Conversely, biological contamination can be attributed to cross-contamination. Meanwhile, the increasing trend at the upper end of the specialty coffee industry consisting of more complex (e.g., yeast inoculation and fruit infusion) and longer post-harvest processing (e.g., extended anaerobic fermentation) methods might be considered at risk for potential spoilage. Here, we report the first case of a mistakenly confused accumulation of mold mycelium on high-end roasted Coffea arabica beans (Gesha variety from Barú, Panama; natural anaerobic process and greenhouse-dried), ultimately identified through UV/Vis spectroscopy (against a caffeine solution) as a conglomerate of needle-like caffeine crystals growing over the beans’ surface. Biological spoilage was unambiguously discarded due to negligible microbial activity, as shown through colony counting and a mycotoxin analysis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the roast degree (development time after the first crack) had a significant effect on the growth of the crystals upon storage (RT and moderate light exposure). Darker roasts (70 s after the first crack) showed a higher accumulation of caffeine crystals than lighter roasts (20 s after the first crack), most likely promoted by coffee oil secretion. However, micro-crystal growth had already been detected in lighter roasts. While uncommon in roasted beans and, so far, poorly documented, crystal formation relates to increased caffeine availability at the surface through initial seed germination. Through the migration towards the endosperm surface, the xanthophyll antibacterial function is activated. A similar confusion of spoilage can be observed in soluble coffee granules. Yet, here, crystals growth was solely related to the high caffeine concentration. In addition, apparent spoilage in soluble coffee does not have the same economic burden as in high-end roasted coffee, and it also remains unrelated to any physiological process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.V.E. and A.B.S.; methodology, F.V.E. and R.A.; software, F.V.E.; validation, F.V.E. and R.A.; formal analysis, F.V.E. and R.A.; investigation, R.A.; resources, A.B.S.; data curation, F.V.E.; writing—original draft preparation, F.V.E.; writing—review and editing, A.B.S.; visualization, F.V.E.; supervision, A.B.S.; project administration, A.B.S.; and funding acquisition, A.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Reem Rushidan and Amer Ba Shuaib were employed by the company Camel Step Co, Khotwat Jamal Trading LTD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Velazquez Escobar, F.; Alrushidan, R.; Ba Shuaib, A. Caffeine Crystal Growth on Roasted Coffee Beans Misidentified as Biological Spoilage. Proceedings 2024, 109, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICC2024-18171

AMA Style

Velazquez Escobar F, Alrushidan R, Ba Shuaib A. Caffeine Crystal Growth on Roasted Coffee Beans Misidentified as Biological Spoilage. Proceedings. 2024; 109(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICC2024-18171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Velazquez Escobar, Francisco, Reem Alrushidan, and Amer Ba Shuaib. 2024. "Caffeine Crystal Growth on Roasted Coffee Beans Misidentified as Biological Spoilage" Proceedings 109, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICC2024-18171

APA Style

Velazquez Escobar, F., Alrushidan, R., & Ba Shuaib, A. (2024). Caffeine Crystal Growth on Roasted Coffee Beans Misidentified as Biological Spoilage. Proceedings, 109(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICC2024-18171

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop